Articles | Volume 22, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-3185-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
An ensemble of regional CMIP3/CMIP5 wind wave scenarios for the North Sea and the Baltic Sea: a revisit
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 16 Oct 2026)
- Preprint (discussion started on 20 Nov 2025)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5715', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jan 2026
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Nikolaus Groll, 23 Apr 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-5715', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Feb 2026
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Nikolaus Groll, 23 Apr 2026
Peer review completion
AR – Author's response | RR – Referee report | ED – Editor decision | EF – Editorial file upload
AR by Nikolaus Groll on behalf of the Authors (11 May 2026)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (12 May 2026) by Matjaz Licer
RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (08 Jun 2026)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (12 Jun 2026)
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (15 Jun 2026) by Matjaz Licer
AR by Nikolaus Groll on behalf of the Authors (16 Jul 2026)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (20 Jul 2026) by Matjaz Licer
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (16 Sep 2026)
ED: Publish as is (04 Oct 2026) by Matjaz Licer
AR by Nikolaus Groll on behalf of the Authors (06 Oct 2026)
Manuscript
1. General comments:
- Concise review of regional wind wave scenarios in the North and Baltic Sea areas, focusing on the range of potential future changes.
- Uses state-of-the-art analysis methods, e.g. the ensemble approach and statistical significance tests.
- Analysis and results for average and higher wave events, considering spatial and temporal variability.
- Discusses the role of uncertainty in future projections.
The scientific methods and assumptions are clearly outlined, and the experiments and calculations are well described. It would be helpful to mention the sources of the regional climate model data, e.g. where the data was provided/downloaded from. This would facilitate reproduction by fellow scientists.
The author gives proper credit to related work in the field and indicates new contributions (see general comments).
The title accurately reflects the contents of the paper (see specific comments).
The abstract provides a concise and complete summary of the paper.
The overall presentation is well structured and clear, and the language is fluent and mostly correct (see technical corrections).
Abbreviations and units are used correctly.
Some minor aspects of the paper could be improved (see the specific comments).
The number and quality of references are appropriate.
The supplementary materials provided are appropriate.
2. Specific comments:
The changes in significant wave height are analysed and discussed. Changes in wave periods and directions are not analysed or discussed, even though these can also have important implications, e.g. for coastal erosion and flooding.
The limitation of the study to significant wave height should be clearer outlined, e.g. in the title or introduction.
The authors show that patterns of change may diverge depending on the statistical variable under consideration. The implications of climate change signals could be discussed in the 'Discussion' section. For example, a relative change in the ensemble median or the 99th percentile, or the maximum and with the same magnitude can have different implications.
3. Technical corrections:
L134: Replace the plural 'areas' with the singular.
L279: the word 'is' is missing before 'evident'.