Articles | Volume 21, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-2305-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Mesoscale dynamics of an intrathermocline eddy in the Canary Eddy Corridor
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 08 Oct 2025)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 28 Jan 2025)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-99', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Feb 2025
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Feb 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1/RC2: Acknowledgment of Review for egusphere-2025-99', Luis P. Valencia, 27 Feb 2025
- AC2: 'Reply on RC3: Acknowledgment of review for manuscript EGUSPHERE-2025-99', Luis P. Valencia, 11 Mar 2025
- AC3: 'Reply on RC1/RC2: Author Response to Referee #1 – End of Discussion Phase', Luis P. Valencia, 03 Apr 2025
-
RC2: 'Reply on RC1', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Feb 2025
-
RC3: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-99', Anonymous Referee #2, 11 Mar 2025
- AC2: 'Reply on RC3: Acknowledgment of review for manuscript EGUSPHERE-2025-99', Luis P. Valencia, 11 Mar 2025
- AC4: 'Reply on RC3: Analysis of Sampling Bias and Eddy Structure (with Technical Supplement).', Luis P. Valencia, 03 Apr 2025
- AC5: 'Reply on RC3: Additional Response (Ongoing Revisions)', Luis P. Valencia, 03 Apr 2025
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Luis P. Valencia on behalf of the Authors (18 Jun 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (18 Jun 2025) by Ilker Fer
RR by Anthony Bosse (24 Jun 2025)

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (06 Jul 2025) by Ilker Fer

AR by Luis P. Valencia on behalf of the Authors (15 Jul 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (20 Jul 2025) by Ilker Fer

AR by Luis P. Valencia on behalf of the Authors (24 Jul 2025)
Author's response
Manuscript
In this paper entitled «Mesoscale dynamics of an intrathermocline eddy in the Canary Eddy Corridor», Valencia et al. analyse remote sensing data from satellite and high esolution data from a cruise to characterise an intrathermocline eddy in great details. Several aspects of the eddy dynamics and history are considered and discussed.
The topic of the paper is relevant to the comprehension of the mesoscale in the region. The figures illustrates well the findings of the paper. The method is well applied and justified. The text and structure of the paper is of good quality.
I congratulate the authors for their serious and thorough work for this initial submission.
I hence recommend this paper to be accepted in Ocean Science journal after minor, but still important, revisions.
Here are my specific comments:
- l60: Bosse et al. (Scientific Reports, 2019 : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49599-8) coud be considered to describe the role of PV as a barrier for horizontal exchanges.
- l68-74 : More boradly speaking subthermocline or intrathermocline eddies have been long known to form via a mechanism of diapycnal mixing (causing the low stratification) identified in two main scenarios : diapycnal mixing followed by restratificationa and gesotrophic adjustment (McWilliams, 1988 : https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1988)018<1178:VGTBA>2.0.CO;2) and friction in the bottom boundary layer along continental slope (D'Asaro, 1988 : https://doi.org/10.1029/JC093iC06p06685). When a prexisting eddy merges with a surface mesoscale eddy, can lead to the . Similarly, history of winter mixing can lead to the formation of isolated deep core. Since the described eddy is living for one year, it experiences winter mixing and restratification. Are they any Argo float in the eddy that could be used to describe the vertical structure of the eddy?
- l138 : Please jusrify the scales chosen for filtering (12km seems to be the spacing between stations? what does 8m correspond to?).
- l145 : Could you please justify the choice of NRT product versus DT? (it seems not to be available for the period, but it could be important to mention).
- l204-207 : What does "r" represent in the equation here? and if it is the radial extension in cylindrical coordinate system, how can it provide values of fluxes?
- l215 : Bentaya could be written in italic throughout the manuscript.
- Figure 2 : This figure is very heavy, please consider using transparency and better choice of marker in order to improve its readiness.
- l229, 244 and Fig 3: It might be more instructive to describe omega in terms of Rossby number (ie normalised by f).
- l287 : This could be the sign of increasing relative importance of high freuency wave compared to mesoscale signal. Do you have means to check this?
- l307 : lens?-like
- l349 : was likely not well resolved.
- Figure 8 : Please find a way to better highlight the section.
- l361 : It looks to me that the radius is actually increasing with depth... Could be maybe hightlight the position of velocity maximum?
- Fig 9: Please add labels for SA. The thicker contours are not visible enough... one label per sigma value is enough.
- l413 : The location of sign change in vorticity does not usually match with the position of maximum velocity. For instance, a Gaussian eddy with a velocity maximum at R would have a change in sign of vorticity at sqrt(2)R.
- l415 : I understand that the "shell" is defined by the zero vorticity contour, am I right?
- l417 An Eulerian way to look at the ability for the eddy to trap water would be to look at the strain rate (which should be near zero in the eddy center and increase ouside the solid-body core). Did you have a look at this diagnostics?
- The definition of radius should be clarified. I see at least three definition : location of solid body rotation core, of velocity maximum, and of zero vorticity. It might be usefull to introduce specific notation of each of these for sake of clarity.
- l430 : The inherent property of PV to be conserved in absence of forcing and dissipation makes it also an important parameter to caracterise the trapping of water.
- Figure 13 : A log scale for PV might show more clearly the two orders of magnitude described in the text.
- Figure 15 : Same remarks as Figure 2.
- l445 : Are they any location of negative PV near the surface? This could be linked to symmetric instability described by Brannigan et al 2017 (see also Thomas et al., 2013 : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2013.02.025).
- l576 : About Biogeochemical impacts : since the Seasoar was carrying an oxygen sensor, how does its distribution look like across the eddy? It could be informative to discuss the possible biogeochemical impact in the light of these measurements.
- l603 : quantities of water