Articles | Volume 16, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-831-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-831-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
An approach to the verification of high-resolution ocean models using spatial methods
Ric Crocker
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Verification, Impacts and Post-Processing, Weather Science, Met
Office, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Jan Maksymczuk
Ocean Forecasting Research & Development, Weather Science, Met
Office, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Marion Mittermaier
Verification, Impacts and Post-Processing, Weather Science, Met
Office, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Marina Tonani
Ocean Forecasting Research & Development, Weather Science, Met
Office, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Christine Pequignet
Ocean Forecasting Research & Development, Weather Science, Met
Office, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Related authors
No articles found.
Mike Bush, David L. A. Flack, Huw W. Lewis, Sylvia I. Bohnenstengel, Chris J. Short, Charmaine Franklin, Adrian P. Lock, Martin Best, Paul Field, Anne McCabe, Kwinten Van Weverberg, Segolene Berthou, Ian Boutle, Jennifer K. Brooke, Seb Cole, Shaun Cooper, Gareth Dow, John Edwards, Anke Finnenkoetter, Kalli Furtado, Kate Halladay, Kirsty Hanley, Margaret A. Hendry, Adrian Hill, Aravindakshan Jayakumar, Richard W. Jones, Humphrey Lean, Joshua C. K. Lee, Andy Malcolm, Marion Mittermaier, Saji Mohandas, Stuart Moore, Cyril Morcrette, Rachel North, Aurore Porson, Susan Rennie, Nigel Roberts, Belinda Roux, Claudio Sanchez, Chun-Hsu Su, Simon Tucker, Simon Vosper, David Walters, James Warner, Stuart Webster, Mark Weeks, Jonathan Wilkinson, Michael Whitall, Keith D. Williams, and Hugh Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-201, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2024-201, 2024
Preprint under review for GMD
Short summary
Short summary
RAL configurations define settings for the Unified Model atmosphere and Joint UK Land Environment Simulator. The third version of the Regional Atmosphere and Land (RAL3) science configuration for kilometre and sub-km scale modelling represents a major advance compared to previous versions (RAL2) by delivering a common science definition for applications in tropical and mid-latitude regions. RAL3 has more realistic precipitation distributions and improved representation of clouds and visibility.
Nieves G. Valiente, Andrew Saulter, Breogan Gomez, Christopher Bunney, Jian-Guo Li, Tamzin Palmer, and Christine Pequignet
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2515–2538, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2515-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2515-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We document the Met Office operational global and regional wave models which provide wave forecasts up to 7 d ahead. Our models present coarser resolution offshore to higher resolution near the coastline. The increased resolution led to replication of the extremes but to some overestimation during modal conditions. If currents are included, wave directions and long period swells near the coast are significantly improved. New developments focus on the optimisation of the models with resolution.
Mike Bush, Ian Boutle, John Edwards, Anke Finnenkoetter, Charmaine Franklin, Kirsty Hanley, Aravindakshan Jayakumar, Huw Lewis, Adrian Lock, Marion Mittermaier, Saji Mohandas, Rachel North, Aurore Porson, Belinda Roux, Stuart Webster, and Mark Weeks
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1713–1734, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1713-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1713-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Building on the baseline of RAL1, the RAL2 science configuration is used for regional modelling around the UM partnership and in operations at the Met Office. RAL2 has been tested in different parts of the world including Australia, India and the UK. RAL2 increases medium and low cloud amounts in the mid-latitudes compared to RAL1, leading to improved cloud forecasts and a reduced diurnal cycle of screen temperature. There is also a reduction in the frequency of heavier precipitation rates.
Juan Manuel Castillo, Huw W. Lewis, Akhilesh Mishra, Ashis Mitra, Jeff Polton, Ashley Brereton, Andrew Saulter, Alex Arnold, Segolene Berthou, Douglas Clark, Julia Crook, Ananda Das, John Edwards, Xiangbo Feng, Ankur Gupta, Sudheer Joseph, Nicholas Klingaman, Imranali Momin, Christine Pequignet, Claudio Sanchez, Jennifer Saxby, and Maria Valdivieso da Costa
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4193–4223, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4193-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4193-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A new environmental modelling system has been developed to represent the effect of feedbacks between atmosphere, land, and ocean in the Indian region. Different approaches to simulating tropical cyclones Titli and Fani are demonstrated. It is shown that results are sensitive to the way in which the ocean response to cyclone evolution is captured in the system. Notably, we show how a more rigorous formulation for the near-surface energy budget can be included when air–sea coupling is included.
Marion Mittermaier, Rachel North, Jan Maksymczuk, Christine Pequignet, and David Ford
Ocean Sci., 17, 1527–1543, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-1527-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-1527-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Regions of enhanced chlorophyll-a concentrations can be identified by applying a threshold to the concentration value to a forecast and observed field (or analysis). These regions can then be treated and analysed as features using diagnostic techniques to consider of the evolution of the chlorophyll-a blooms in space and time. This allows us to understand whether the biogeochemistry in the model has any skill in predicting these blooms, their location, intensity, onset, duration and demise.
Chiara Marsigli, Elizabeth Ebert, Raghavendra Ashrit, Barbara Casati, Jing Chen, Caio A. S. Coelho, Manfred Dorninger, Eric Gilleland, Thomas Haiden, Stephanie Landman, and Marion Mittermaier
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 21, 1297–1312, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1297-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-21-1297-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper reviews new observations for the verification of high-impact weather and provides advice for their usage in objective verification. New observations include remote sensing datasets, products developed for nowcasting, datasets derived from telecommunication systems, data collected from citizens, reports of impacts and reports from insurance companies. This work has been performed in the framework of the Joint Working Group on Forecast Verification Research (JWGFVR) of the WMO.
Mike Bush, Tom Allen, Caroline Bain, Ian Boutle, John Edwards, Anke Finnenkoetter, Charmaine Franklin, Kirsty Hanley, Humphrey Lean, Adrian Lock, James Manners, Marion Mittermaier, Cyril Morcrette, Rachel North, Jon Petch, Chris Short, Simon Vosper, David Walters, Stuart Webster, Mark Weeks, Jonathan Wilkinson, Nigel Wood, and Mohamed Zerroukat
Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1999–2029, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1999-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1999-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper we define the first Regional Atmosphere and Land (RAL) science configuration for kilometre-scale modelling using the Unified Model (UM) as the basis for the atmosphere and the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES) for the land. RAL1 defines the science configuration of the dynamics and physics schemes of the atmosphere and land. This configuration will provide a model baseline for any future weather or climate model developments to be described against.
Marina Tonani, Peter Sykes, Robert R. King, Niall McConnell, Anne-Christine Péquignet, Enda O'Dea, Jennifer A. Graham, Jeff Polton, and John Siddorn
Ocean Sci., 15, 1133–1158, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1133-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1133-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
A new high-resolution ocean model at 1.5 km has replaced the 7 km system for delivering short-term forecasts of the North-West European Shelf seas. The products (temperature, salinity, currents, and sea surface height) are available on the Copernicus Marine Service catalogue. This study focuses on the high-resolution impact on the quality of the products delivered to the users. Results show that the high-resolution model is better at resolving the variability of the physical variables.
Huw W. Lewis, Juan Manuel Castillo Sanchez, John Siddorn, Robert R. King, Marina Tonani, Andrew Saulter, Peter Sykes, Anne-Christine Pequignet, Graham P. Weedon, Tamzin Palmer, Joanna Staneva, and Lucy Bricheno
Ocean Sci., 15, 669–690, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-669-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-669-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasts of ocean temperature, salinity, currents, and sea height can be improved by linking state-of-the-art ocean and wave models, so that they can interact to better represent the real world. We test this approach in an ocean model of north-west Europe which can simulate small-scale details of the ocean state. The intention is to implement the system described in this study for operational use so that improved information can be provided to users of ocean forecast data.
Giovanni Coppini, Palmalisa Marra, Rita Lecci, Nadia Pinardi, Sergio Cretì, Mario Scalas, Luca Tedesco, Alessandro D'Anca, Leopoldo Fazioli, Antonio Olita, Giuseppe Turrisi, Cosimo Palazzo, Giovanni Aloisio, Sandro Fiore, Antonio Bonaduce, Yogesh Vittal Kumkar, Stefania Angela Ciliberti, Ivan Federico, Gianandrea Mannarini, Paola Agostini, Roberto Bonarelli, Sara Martinelli, Giorgia Verri, Letizia Lusito, Davide Rollo, Arturo Cavallo, Antonio Tumolo, Tony Monacizzo, Marco Spagnulo, Rorberto Sorgente, Andrea Cucco, Giovanni Quattrocchi, Marina Tonani, Massimiliano Drudi, Paola Nassisi, Laura Conte, Laura Panzera, Antonio Navarra, and Giancarlo Negro
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 533–547, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-533-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-533-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
SeaConditions aims to support the users by providing the environmental information in due time and with adequate accuracy in the marine and coastal environments, enforcing users' sea situational awareness. SeaConditions consists of a web and mobile application for the provision of meteorological and oceanographic observation and forecasting products. The iOS/Android apps were downloaded by more than 105 000 users and more than 100 000 users have visited the web version (www.sea-conditions.com).
David Walters, Ian Boutle, Malcolm Brooks, Thomas Melvin, Rachel Stratton, Simon Vosper, Helen Wells, Keith Williams, Nigel Wood, Thomas Allen, Andrew Bushell, Dan Copsey, Paul Earnshaw, John Edwards, Markus Gross, Steven Hardiman, Chris Harris, Julian Heming, Nicholas Klingaman, Richard Levine, James Manners, Gill Martin, Sean Milton, Marion Mittermaier, Cyril Morcrette, Thomas Riddick, Malcolm Roberts, Claudio Sanchez, Paul Selwood, Alison Stirling, Chris Smith, Dan Suri, Warren Tennant, Pier Luigi Vidale, Jonathan Wilkinson, Martin Willett, Steve Woolnough, and Prince Xavier
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1487–1520, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1487-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1487-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Global Atmosphere (GA) configurations of the Unified Model (UM) and Global Land (GL) configurations of JULES are developed for use in any global atmospheric modelling application.
We describe a recent iteration of these configurations: GA6/GL6. This includes ENDGame: a new dynamical core designed to improve the model's accuracy, stability and scalability. GA6 is now operational in a variety of Met Office and UM collaborators applications and hence its documentation is important.
We describe a recent iteration of these configurations: GA6/GL6. This includes ENDGame: a new dynamical core designed to improve the model's accuracy, stability and scalability. GA6 is now operational in a variety of Met Office and UM collaborators applications and hence its documentation is important.
J. R. Siddorn, S. A. Good, C. M. Harris, H. W. Lewis, J. Maksymczuk, M. J. Martin, and A. Saulter
Ocean Sci., 12, 217–231, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-217-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-217-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The Met Office provides a range of services in the marine environment. To support these services, and to ensure they evolve to meet the demands of users and are based on the best available science, a number of scientific challenges need to be addressed. The paper summarises the key challenges, and highlights some priorities for the ocean monitoring and forecasting research group at the Met Office.
Cited articles
Aznar, R., Sotillo, M., Cailleau, S., Lorente, P., Levier, B.,
Amo-Baladrón, A., Reffray, G., and Alvarez Fanjul, E.: Strengths and
weaknesses of the CMEMS forecasted and reanalyzed solutions for the
Iberia-Biscay-Ireland (IBI) waters, J. Marine. Syst., 159, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.02.007, 2016.
Brassington, G.: Forecast Errors, Goodness, and Verification in Ocean
Forecasting, J. Marine Res., 75, 403–433, https://doi.org/10.1357/002224017821836851, 2017.
Brier, G. W.: Verification of Forecasts Expressed in Terms of Probability,
Mon. Weather Rev., 78, 1–3, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:VOFEIT>2.0.CO;2, 1950.
Brown, T. A.: Admissible scoring systems for continuous distributions, Santa
Monica, CA, RAND Corporation, available at:
https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P5235.html (last access: March 2020), 1974.
Casati, B., Ross, G., and Stephenson, D. B.: A new intensity-scale approach
for the verification of spatial precipitation forecasts, Met. Apps., 11,
141–154, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482704001239, 2004.
Davis, C., Brown, B., and Bullock, R.: Object-Based Verification of
Precipitation Forecasts. Part I: Methodology and Application to Mesoscale
Rain Areas, Mon. Weather Rev., 134, 1772–1784, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3145.1, 2006.
Dorninger, M., Gilleland, E., Casati, B., Mittermaier, M. P., Ebert, E. E.,
Brown, B. G., and Wilson, L. J.: The Setup of the MesoVICT Project, B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 1887–1906, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0164.1, 2018.
Ebert, E. E.: Fuzzy verification of high-resolution gridded forecasts: a
review and proposed framework, Met. Apps, 15, 51–64, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.25, 2008.
Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R.: Bootstrap methods for standard errors,
confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy,
Stat. Sci., 1, 54–77, 1986.
Epstein, E. S.: A Scoring System for Probability Forecasts of Ranked
Categories, J. Appl. Meteorol., 8, 985–987, 1969.
Gilleland, E., Ahijevych, D., Brown, B. G., Casati, B., and Ebert, E. E.:
Intercomparison of Spatial Forecast Verification Methods, Weather Forecast.,
24, 1416–1430, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009WAF2222269.1, 2009.
Goessling, H. F., Tietsche, S., Day, J. J., Hawkins, E., and Jung, T. :
Predictability of the Arctic sea ice edge, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 1642–1650, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067232, 2016.
Graham, J. A., O'Dea, E., Holt, J., Polton, J., Hewitt, H. T., Furner, R., Guihou, K., Brereton, A., Arnold, A., Wakelin, S., Castillo Sanchez, J. M., and Mayorga Adame, C. G.: AMM15: a new high-resolution NEMO configuration for operational simulation of the European north-west shelf, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 681–696, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-681-2018, 2018.
Hernandez, F., Blockley, E., Brassington, G. B., Davidson, F., Divakaran,
P., Drévillon, M., Ishizaki, S., Garcia-Sotillo, M., Hogan, P. J.,
Lagemaa, P., Levier, B., Martin, M., Mehra, A., Mooers, C., Ferry, N., Ryan,
A., Regnier, C., Sellar, A., Smith, G. C., Sofianos, S., Spindler, T.,
Volpe, G., Wilkin, J., Zaron, E. D., and Zhang, A.: Recent progress in
performance evaluations and near real-time assessment of operational ocean
products, J. Oper. Oceanogr., 8, 221–238, https://doi.org/10.1080/1755876X.2015.1050282, 2015.
Hernandez, F., Smith, G., Baetens, K., Cossarini, G., Garcia-Hermosa, I.,
Drevillon, M., Maksymczuk, J., Melet, A., Regnier, C., and von Schuckmann,
K.: Measuring Performances, Skill and Accuracy in Operational Oceanography:
New Challenges and Approaches, in: New Frontiers in Operational
Oceanography, edited by: Chassignet, E., Pascual, A., Tintore, J., and Verron, J.,
GODAE OceanView, 759–796, https://doi.org/10.17125/gov2018.ch29, 2018.
Hersbach, H.: Decomposition of the Continuous Ranked Probability Score for
Ensemble Prediction Systems, Weather Forecast., 15, 559–570, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(2000)015<0559:DOTCRP>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Holt, J., Hyder, P., Ashworth, M., Harle, J., Hewitt, H. T., Liu, H., New, A. L., Pickles, S., Porter, A., Popova, E., Allen, J. I., Siddorn, J., and Wood, R.: Prospects for improving the representation of coastal and shelf seas in global ocean models, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 499–523, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-499-2017, 2017.
Howarth, M. and Pugh, D.: Chapter 4 Observations of Tides Over the
Continental Shelf of North-West Europe, Elsevier Oceanography Series, 35,
135–188, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0422-9894(08)70502-6, 1983.
Juza, M., Mourre, B., Lellouche, J. M., Tonani M., and Tintoré, J.: From
basin to sub-basin scale assessment and intercomparison of numerical
simulations in the western Mediterranean Sea, J. Mar. Syst., 149, 36–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2015.04.010, 2015.
Keil, C. and Craig, G. C.: A Displacement-Based Error Measure Applied in a
Regional Ensemble Forecasting System, Mon. Weather Rev., 135, 3248–3259,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3457.1, 2007.
King, R., While, J., Martin, M. J., Lea, D. J., Lemieux-Dudon, B., Waters,
J., and O'Dea, E.: Improving the initialisation of the Met Office operational
shelf-seas model, Ocean Model., 130, 1–14, 2018.
Le Traon, P. Y., Reppucci, A., Alvarez Fanjul, E., Aouf, L., Behrens, A., Belmonte, M.,
Bentamy, A., Bertino, L., Brando, V. E., Kreiner, M. B., Benkiran, M., Carval, T., Ciliberti,
S. A., Claustre, H., Clementi, E., Coppini, G., Cossarini, G., De Alfonso
Alonso-Muñoyerro, M., Delamarche, A., Dibarboure, G., Dinessen, F., Drevillon, M.,
Drillet, Y., Faugere, Y., Fernández, V., Fleming, A., Garcia-Hermosa, M. I., Sotillo,
M. G., Garric, G., Gasparin, F., Giordan, C., Gehlen, M., Gregoire, M. L., Guinehut, S.,
Hamon, M., Harris, C., Hernandez, F., Hinkler, J. B., Hoyer, J., Karvonen, J., Kay, S., King,
R., Lavergne, T., Lemieux-Dudon, B., Lima, L., Mao, C., Martin, M. J., Masina, S., Melet, A.,
Buongiorno Nardelli, B., Nolan, G., Pascual, A., Pistoia, J., Palazov, A., Piolle, J. F.,
Pujol, M. I., Pequignet, A. C., Peneva, E., Pérez Gómez, B., Petit de la Villeon,
L., Pinardi, N., Pisano, A., Pouliquen, S., Reid, R., Remy, E., Santoleri, R., Siddorn, J.,
She, J., Staneva, J., Stoffelen, A., Tonani, M., Vandenbulcke, L., von Schuckmann, K.,
Volpe, G., Wettre, C., and Zacharioudaki, A.: From Observation to Information and
Users: The Copernicus Marine Service Perspective, Front. Mar. Sci., 6, 234, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00234, 2019.
Lorente, P., García-Sotillo, M., Amo-Baladrón, A., Aznar, R., Levier, B., Sánchez-Garrido, J. C., Sammartino, S., de Pascual-Collar, Á., Reffray, G., Toledano, C., and Álvarez-Fanjul, E.: Skill assessment of global, regional, and coastal circulation forecast models: evaluating the benefits of dynamical downscaling in IBI (Iberia–Biscay–Ireland) surface waters, Ocean Sci., 15, 967–996, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-967-2019, 2019a.
Lorente, P., Sotillo, M., Amo-Baladrón, A., Aznar, R., Levier, B., Aouf,
L., Dabrowski, T., Pascual, Á., Reffray, G., Dalphinet, A., Toledano
Lozano, C., Rainaud, R., and Alvarez Fanjul, E. : The NARVAL Software
Toolbox in Support of Ocean Models Skill Assessment at Regional and Coastal
Scales, doi10.1007/978-3-030-22747-0_25, 2019b.
Madec, G. and the NEMO team: NEMO ocean engine, Note du Pôle de
modélisation, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL), France, No 27 ISSN
1288-1619, 2016.
Mason, E., Ruiz, S., Bourdalle-Badie, R., Reffray, G., García-Sotillo, M., and Pascual, A.: New insight into 3-D mesoscale eddy properties from CMEMS operational models in the western Mediterranean, Ocean Sci., 15, 1111–1131, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1111-2019, 2019.
Mass, C. F., Ovens, D., Westrick, K., and Colle, B. A.: DOES INCREASING
HORIZONTAL RESOLUTION PRODUCE MORE SKILLFUL FORECASTS?, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 83, 407–430, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083<0407:DIHRPM>2.3.CO;2, 2002.
Mirouze, I., Blockley, E. W., Lea, D. J., Martin, M. J., and Bell, M. J.: A
multiple length scale correlation operator for ocean data assimilation,
Tellus A, 68, 29744, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v68.29744,
2016.
Mittermaier, M., Roberts, N., and Thompson, S. A.: A long-term assessment of
precipitation forecast skill using the Fractions Skill Score, Met. Apps, 20,
176–186, https://doi.org/10.1002/met.296, 2013.
Mittermaier, M. P.: A Strategy for Verifying Near-Convection-Resolving Model
Forecasts at Observing Sites, Weather Forecast., 29, 185–204, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-12-00075.1, 2014.
Mittermaier, M. P. and Csima, G.: Ensemble versus Deterministic Performance
at the Kilometer Scale, Weather Forecast., 32, 1697–1709, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0164.1, 2017.
Mogensen, K., Balmaseda, M. A., and Weaver, A.: The NEMOVAR ocean data
assimilation system as implemented in the ECMWF ocean analysis for System 4,
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK, 2012.
Mourre, B., Aguiar, E., Juza, M., Hernandez-Lasheras, J., Reyes, E., Heslop, E., Escudier,
R., Cutolo, E., Ruiz, S., Mason, E., Pascual, A., and Tintoré, J.:
Assessment of high-resolution regional ocean prediction systems using
muli-platform observations: illustrations in the Western Mediterranean Sea,
in: New Frontiers in Operational Oceanography, edited by: Chassignet, E., Pascual, A., Tintoré,
J., and Verron, J., GODAE Ocean View, 663–694, https://doi.org/10.17125/gov2018.ch24, 2018.
O'Dea, E. J., Arnold, A. K., Edwards, K. P., Furner, R., Hyder, P., Martin,
M. J., Siddorn, J. R., Storkey, D., While, J., Holt, J. T., and Liu, H.: An
operational ocean forecast system incorporating NEMO and SST data
assimilation for the tidally driven European North-West shelf, J. Oper.
Oceanogr., 5, 3–17, https://doi.org/10.1080/1755876X.2012.11020128, 2012.
O'Dea, E., Furner, R., Wakelin, S., Siddorn, J., While, J., Sykes, P., King, R., Holt, J., and Hewitt, H.: The CO5 configuration of the 7 km Atlantic Margin Model: large-scale biases and sensitivity to forcing, physics options and vertical resolution, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 2947–2969, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2947-2017, 2017.
Rossa, A., Nurmi, P., and Ebert, E.: Overview of methods for the verification of
quantitative precipitation forecasts, in: Precipitation: Advances in
Measurement, Estimation and Prediction, edited by: Michaelides, S.,
Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 419–452, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77655-0_16, 2008.
Tonani, M., Sykes, P., King, R. R., McConnell, N., Péquignet, A.-C., O'Dea, E., Graham, J. A., Polton, J., and Siddorn, J.: The impact of a new high-resolution ocean model on the Met Office North-West European Shelf forecasting system, Ocean Sci., 15, 1133–1158, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1133-2019, 2019.
World Meteorological Organisation: Guide to Meteorological Instruments and
Methods of Observation (WMO-No. 8, the CIMO Guide), available at: https://library.wmo.int/opac/doc_num.php?explnum_id=4147 (last access: June 2019), 2017.
Short summary
We assessed the potential benefit of a new verification metric, developed by the atmospheric community, to assess high-resolution ocean models against coarser-resolution configurations. Typical verification metrics often do not show any benefit when high-resolution models are compared to lower-resolution configurations. The new metric showed improvements in higher-resolution models away from the grid scale. The technique can be applied to both deterministic and ensemble forecasts.
We assessed the potential benefit of a new verification metric, developed by the atmospheric...