Articles | Volume 21, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-2125-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Currents and their drivers in the Archipelago Sea: insights from ADCP measurements
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 30 Sep 2025)
- Preprint (discussion started on 14 Mar 2025)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor
| : Report abuse
-
RC1: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1101', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Apr 2025
- AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Hedi Kanarik, 16 Jun 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on egusphere-2025-1101', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 May 2025
- AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Hedi Kanarik, 16 Jun 2025
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by Hedi Kanarik on behalf of the Authors (16 Jun 2025)
Author's response
Author's tracked changes
Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (23 Jun 2025) by Mario Hoppema

AR by Hedi Kanarik on behalf of the Authors (23 Jul 2025)
Author's response
Manuscript
This is a manuscript describing current measurements in the Archipelago Sea in the northern Baltic Sea. Observations time series from various times and locations are analyzed and related to forcing from winds, sea levels and air pressure, and it is found that winds are the main forcing component, but that sea levels can weaken or strengthen currents under certain conditions, mainly when the sea level in the Bothnian Bay is low and that in the Gulf of Finland is high due to seiching motions. Genrally it is a well written and well performed study that deserves publication.
One issue is that it makes little sense to compare the maximum value between different observation series since it is a function of record length as well as ensemble length. It would be better to present a percentile value, e.g. 99% or 99.9% or something like that, e.g. of hourly mean current speeds, in order to make the numbers more comparable.
Detailed comments:
Line 14: basing -> basins, current -> currents
Line 15: dirction -> directions, related -> relative
Line 66: published -> unpublished ?
Line 90-91: move “bottom mounted” to before “Teledyne” since Teledyne do probably not sell bottom mounted instruments 😉
Line 103: Unclear what this means. Was the instrument compass calibrated for magnetic variation or how was it taken into account?
Lines 142- 143: Unclear what is meant here. Winds are weakened between NNE and S but E (which is within this interval) is overestimated??
Lines 157 - 159: Unclear text. Please clarify.
Line 190: “Halocline” -> “The halocline”. Please also check similar issues other places in the text.
Lines 236-240: This is interesting, since it must mean that water is added along the length of the channel. Any speculations about where this water is taken from?
Line 267: This -> these