Ocean Science
Ocean Science
OS
Articles | Volume 15, issue 6
Articles | Volume 15, issue 6
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1801-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1801-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 15, issue 6
Research article
 | 
20 Dec 2019
Research article |  | 20 Dec 2019

Evaluation of nonidentical versus identical twin approaches for observation impact assessments: an ensemble-Kalman-filter-based ocean assimilation application for the Gulf of Mexico

Liuqian Yu, Katja Fennel, Bin Wang, Arnaud Laurent, Keith R. Thompson, and Lynn K. Shay

Viewed

Total article views: 2,654 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,751 819 84 2,654 90 79
  • HTML: 1,751
  • PDF: 819
  • XML: 84
  • Total: 2,654
  • BibTeX: 90
  • EndNote: 79
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Aug 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Aug 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,654 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,133 with geography defined and 521 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
We present a first direct comparison of nonidentical versus identical twin approaches for an ocean data assimilation system. We show that the identical twin approach overestimates the value of assimilating satellite observations and undervalues the benefit of assimilating temperature and salinity profiles. Misleading assessments such as undervaluing the impact of observational assets are problematic and can lead to misguided decisions on balancing investments among different observing assets.
Read more