the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

# Mode-1 N_{2} internal tides observed by satellite altimetry

Satellite altimetry provides a unique technique for observing the sea surface height (SSH) signature of internal tides from space. Previous studies have constructed empirical internal tide models for the four largest constituents M_{2}, S_{2}, K_{1}, and O_{1} by satellite altimetry. Yet no empirical models have been constructed for minor tidal constituents. In this study, we observe mode-1 N_{2} internal tides (the fifth largest constituent) using about 100 satellite years of SSH data from 1993 to 2019. We employ a recently developed mapping procedure that includes two rounds of plane wave analysis and a two-dimensional bandpass filter in between. The results show that mode-1 N_{2} internal tides have millimeter-scale SSH amplitudes. Model errors are estimated from background internal tides that are mapped using the same altimetry data but with a tidal period of 12.6074 h (N_{2} minus 3 min). The global mean error variance is about 25 % that of N_{2}, suggesting that the mode-1 N_{2} internal tides can overcome model errors in some regions. We find that the N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides have similar spatial patterns and that the N_{2} amplitudes are about 20 % of the M_{2} amplitudes. Both features are determined by the N_{2} and M_{2} barotropic tides. The mode-1 N_{2} internal tides are observed to propagate hundreds to thousands of kilometers in the open ocean. The globally integrated N_{2} and M_{2} internal tide energies are 1.8 and 30.9 PJ, respectively. Their ratio of 5.8 % is larger than the theoretical value of 4 % because the N_{2} internal tides contain relatively larger model errors. Our mode-1 N_{2} internal tide model is evaluated using independent satellite altimetry data in 2020 and 2021. The results suggest that the model can make internal tide correction in regions where the model variance is greater than twice the error variance. This work demonstrates that minor internal tidal constituents can be observed using multiyear multi-satellite altimetry data and dedicated mapping techniques.

- Article
(15176 KB) - Full-text XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote

_{2}internal tides observed by satellite altimetry, Ocean Sci., 19, 1067–1082, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1067-2023, 2023.

The Moon's elliptical orbit around the Earth has an eccentricity of ≈ 0.055, with its perigean and apogean distances being about 3.63 × 10^{5} and 4.06 × 10^{5} km, respectively. The Moon completes one revolution every 27.5546 d (1 anomalistic month). The tidal constituents L_{2} and N_{2} are induced by the Moon's elliptical orbit (Doodson, 1921). They are named the smaller and larger lunar elliptical semidiurnal constituents. The L_{2} and N_{2} periods are 12.1916 and 12.6583 h, respectively (Doodson, 1921; Pawlowicz et al., 2002). M_{2} (12.4206 h) is based on the mean distance between the Earth and the Moon (3.84 × 10^{5} km). The L_{2} and N_{2} superposition gives the 27.5546 d perturbation because the Moon–Earth distance changes along the elliptic orbit. On a global average, the amplitudes of M_{2}, N_{2}, and L_{2} have a respective ratio of $\mathrm{1}:\mathrm{0.2}:\mathrm{0.05}$. N_{2} is the fifth largest tidal constituent; therefore, its impact on the ocean environment is significant. For example, in waters around New Zealand, the N_{2} barotropic tide has larger amplitudes than S_{2} (Byun and Hart, 2020, Fig. 4 therein). The superposition of N_{2}, M_{2}, L_{2}, and S_{2} can cause perigean spring tides (king tides) and apogean neap tides, which significantly affect harbors, coastal regions, and estuaries (Wood, 1978). Including N_{2} internal tides can simulate the temporal variation in internal tide energetics with the Moon's elliptical motion. Theoretically, N_{2} may modulate M_{2} internal tides by ± 20 % in amplitude and by ± 40 % in energy (i.e., (1 ± 0.2)^{2}). On average, N_{2} will enhance the M_{2}-induced ocean mixing by 4 % (i.e., 0.2^{2}).

Internal tides are widespread in the ocean and affect numerous ocean processes such as diapycnal mixing, tracer transport, and acoustic transmission (Wunsch, 1975; Dushaw et al., 1995; Whalen et al., 2020). Internal tides may provide about half of the power for diapycnal mixing in the ocean interior (Munk and Wunsch, 1998; Egbert and Ray, 2000; MacKinnon et al., 2017; Kelly et al., 2021). The magnitude and geography of diapycnal mixing may modulate the large-scale ocean circulation and global climate change; therefore, it is important to study their generation, propagation, and dissipation in the global ocean (Jayne and St Laurent, 2001; Melet et al., 2016; Pollmann et al., 2019; Vic et al., 2019; de Lavergne et al., 2020; Arbic, 2022). Internal tides are annoying noise in the study of mesoscale and sub-mesoscale dynamics. In particular, it will be necessary to make internal tide correction to the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) data, so that one can better study the sub-mesoscale dynamic processes (Fu and Ubelmann, 2014; Qiu et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2018; Morrow et al., 2019). Empirical internal tide models can be constructed using past satellite altimetry sea surface height (SSH) measurements. However, previous satellite observations focus mainly on the four largest tidal constituents: M_{2}, S_{2}, K_{1}, and O_{1} (Dushaw, 2015; Ray and Zaron, 2016; Zhao et al., 2016; Zaron, 2019; Ubelmann et al., 2022). Dushaw (2015) attempts to map N_{2} internal tides using the TOPEX/Poseidon data from 1992 to 2008 but fails to obtain an empirical model because the resulting N_{2} internal tides are too noisy (see his Figs. 38 and 52). That work is mainly limited by the short data set available then. In this study, we will construct a reliable empirical N_{2} internal tide model using a larger data set and a recently developed mapping method.

The challenge of observing N_{2} internal tides by satellite altimetry lies in their small SSH displacements (Dushaw, 2015). Given that M_{2} internal tides have SSH amplitudes of 1–2 cm, N_{2} internal tides have only sub-centimeter SSH amplitudes. In this paper, the observation of N_{2} internal tides is made possible by two improvements. First, a larger SSH data set is available, thanks to almost 3 decades of multiple satellite observations since 1993. The merged data set from 1993 to 2019 is about 100 satellite years long; therefore, non-tidal errors can be significantly suppressed. Second, a recently developed mapping procedure is employed. This mapping technique extracts N_{2} internal tides utilizing their known frequency and theoretical wavelengths. Non-tidal errors can be significantly suppressed by both temporal and spatial filters. The resulting N_{2} internal tides reveal their basic features in the global ocean, although they are still noisy (compared to the much larger M_{2} internal tides). It is challenging (though possible) to extract L_{2} internal tides in some regions, which are estimated to have 1 mm SSH signals at most (5 % of M_{2}).

The rest of this paper is arranged as follows. Section 2 describes the data and methods used in this paper. Section 3 presents and discusses the new N_{2} internal tides, mainly by comparing them with the well-studied M_{2} internal tides. Section 4 is a summary.

## 2.1 Data

The satellite altimetry SSH data used in this paper are collected by multiple altimetry missions from 1993 to 2021. In the order of launch time, they are TOPEX/Poseidon, ERS-1, ERS-2, Geosat Follow-On, Jason-1, Envisat, Jason-2, CryoSat-2, SARAL/AltiKa, Haiyang-2A, Jason-3, Sentinel-3A, Sentinel-3B, Haiyang-2B, and Jason-CS/Sentinel-6 (Fig. 1). The combined data set from 1993 to 2019 is about 100 satellite years long. We use the satellite along-track SSH data downloaded from the Copernicus Marine Service (https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00146). The SSH measurements have been processed by standard corrections for atmospheric effects, surface wave bias, and geophysical effects (Pujol et al., 2016; Taburet et al., 2019). The ocean barotropic tide, polar tide, solid Earth tide, and loading tide are corrected using theoretical or empirical models (Pujol et al., 2016). Mesoscale correction (Ray and Byrne, 2010; Zhao, 2022a) is made using the gridded SSH fields downloaded from the Copernicus Marine Service (https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00148). The satellite along-track SSH data in 2020 and 2021 are used to evaluate the new N_{2} internal tide model as independent data (Sect. 2.6). Extracted from the 27-year-long data, our N_{2} internal tide model contains only the 27-year coherent component. Their temporal variation (or incoherent component) is not addressed in this paper.

The observation of internal tides by satellite altimetry may be affected by an issue called tidal aliasing because the satellite repeat cycles are much longer than the semidiurnal and diurnal tidal periods. Here we examine possible tidal aliasing issues with N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides. In one 160 km by 160 km fitting window (Sect. 2.2), there are typically about 7.84 × 10^{4} SSH data from multiyear multi-satellite measurements. Using their observation times, we can calculate their phase lags with respect to the N_{2} tidal cycle (12.6583 h). Figure 2a gives the histogram of their phase lags over one N_{2} tidal cycle. For comparison, Fig. 2b shows the histogram with respect to the M_{2} tidal cycle (12.4206 h). The results show that the SSH data overall evenly distribute over one N_{2} or M_{2} tidal cycle, without extreme biases. In particular, their distribution on M_{2} is smooth, suggesting that there is no tidal aliasing issues for M_{2}. Their distribution over N_{2} is a little bumpy, suggesting that the resulting N_{2} internal tides may have larger errors. The uneven distribution stems from the orbital configurations of the satellite missions. Fortunately, as shown in this study, the new mode-1 N_{2} internal tides can overcome background noise in some regions.

## 2.2 Plane wave analysis

The core technique of our mapping procedure is plane wave analysis. By this method, internal tides are determined by fitting horizontal plane waves in one given fitting window (160 km by 160 km in this study), in contrast to harmonic analysis at one single site. This method has been described in detail in our previous studies (Zhao and Alford, 2009; Zhao, 2014; Zhao et al., 2016). For each tidal constituent, there may be multiple internal tides of arbitrary propagation directions at each site, due to their multiple source regions and long-range propagation. Plane wave analysis can resolve these internal tides by propagation direction. We will fit five mode-1 N_{2} internal tidal waves at each site. Our five-wave representor follows

where *x* and *y* are the east and north Cartesian coordinates, *t* is time, and *ω* and *k* are the frequency and horizontal wavenumber of the target internal tides, respectively. Three parameters need to be determined for each internal tidal wave: amplitude *A*, phase *ϕ*, and direction *θ*. To determine one wave, the amplitude and phase of a single plane wave are determined by the least-squares fit in each compass direction (with 1^{∘} increment). When the resulting amplitudes are plotted as a function of direction in polar coordinates, an internal tidal wave appears to be a lobe. The direction of the first wave is thus determined from the biggest lobe. Thus, the amplitude *A*, phase *ϕ*, and propagation direction *θ* of one internal tidal wave are determined. Afterward, its signal is predicted and subtracted from the original data, which removes the wave itself and its side lobes. This procedure can be repeated to extract an arbitrary number of waves one by one. The resulting internal tidal waves are sorted with descending amplitudes.

The frequency (*ω*) and horizontal wavenumber (*k*) of the target internal tides are needed in plane wave analysis. The M_{2} and N_{2} tidal periods (equivalent to frequencies) are from the Moon's orbital motion around the Earth (Doodson, 1921; Pawlowicz et al., 2002). They are 12.4206 and 12.6583 h, respectively. The local phase speed (equivalent to wavenumber) of the target internal tides is theoretically determined from the World Ocean Atlas 2018 (WOA18) (Boyer et al., 2018). The WOA18 provides climatological hydrographic profiles on a spatial grid of 0.25^{∘} latitude by 0.25^{∘} longitude. Ocean depth is based on the 1 arcmin topography database constructed using in situ and satellite measurements (Smith and Sandwell, 1997). For a given ocean depth and stratification profile, the vertical structures and eigenvalue speeds of internal tides are obtained by solving the Sturm–Liouville equation (Gill, 1982; Chelton et al., 1998; Kelly, 2016):

subject to free-surface and rigid-bottom boundary conditions, where *N*(*z*) is the buoyancy frequency profile and *c* is the eigenvalue speed. The phase speed *c*_{p} can be calculated from the eigenvalue speed following

where *ω* and *f* are the tidal and inertial frequencies, respectively. Note that the phase speed is a function of longitude and latitude (Zhao et al., 2016).

## 2.3 Mapping procedure

Our three-step mapping procedure consists of two rounds of plane wave analysis and a spatial two-dimensional (2D) bandpass filter in between (Zhao, 2020, 2021, 2022a, b). In this paper, the mapping process is illustrated by showing intermediate results in Fig. 3. An interested reader is referred to the above papers for more details.

In step 1, mode-1 N_{2} internal tides are mapped by plane wave analysis as described above. The N_{2} internal tides are mapped from along-track SSH data onto a spatially regular grid. In this paper, our fitting window is chosen to be 160 km by 160 km, consistent with wavelengths of mode-1 N_{2} internal tides. The resulting N_{2} internal tides are at a 0.2^{∘} longitude by 0.2^{∘} latitude grid. At each grid point, five mode-1 N_{2} internal tidal waves of arbitrary propagation directions are determined. The vector sum of these five waves gives the internal tide solution. Figure 3a shows the mode-1 N_{2} internal tide field obtained in this step. It gives obvious internal tide signals (e.g., around the Hawaiian Ridge) but the non-tidal noise is high. In step 2, the spatially regular N_{2} internal tide field is cleaned by a 2D bandpass filter in overlapping 850 km by 850 km windows. The N_{2} internal tide field is first converted to the 2D wavenumber spectrum by Fourier transform. The spectrum is truncated to [0.8, 1.25] times the local wavenumber. The truncated spectrum is converted back to the internal tide field by inverse Fourier transform. Figure 3b shows the cleaned N_{2} internal tide field. Now the N_{2} internal tide signals are much cleaner. However, Fig. 3b cannot resolve multiple internal tidal waves yet. In step 3, plane wave analysis is called again to decompose the filtered internal tide field into five internal waves of arbitrary propagation directions. The second-round plane wave analysis is the same as the first-round plane wave analysis, except that the input is the filtered internal tide field in step 2. In the end, the resulting five waves are saved with their respective amplitudes, phases, and directions. Figure 3c shows the five-wave superimposed internal tide field. It is very similar to Fig. 3b because this step only
decompose the internal tide field. The five-wave decomposition allows us to separate internal tides of different propagation directions. They will be used to extract long-range internal tidal beams in the ocean (Sect. 3).

## 2.4 N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides

We map both the mode-1 N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides following the same three-step procedure. They are constructed from the same satellite altimetry data but using their respective wave parameters (frequency and wavenumber). Figure 4 shows the resulting N_{2} and M_{2} internal tide fields. Internal tides in shallow waters (< 1000 m) are discarded. The new M_{2} internal tides are almost identical to those obtained in previous studies using slightly different satellite data (Zhao, 2022b). Here we find that the N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides have similar spatial patterns and that the N_{2} amplitudes are about 20 % of the M_{2} amplitudes. The largest N_{2} amplitudes are about 5 mm, compared to 20–30 mm for M_{2} internal tides. To account for this factor, their color map ranges are different by a factor of 5. Figure 4 gives SWOT ground tracks in its 1 d fast-repeating phase (green lines). It shows that strong mode-1 N_{2} internal tides occur under some SWOT swaths, for example, those off the California coast, in the New Caledonia region, in the western North Pacific, and on the Amazon continental shelf. In these regions, the N_{2} internal tides cannot be neglected in the study of sub-mesoscale dynamics. Conversely, the upcoming SWOT data also offer a great opportunity to explore N_{2} internal tides.

We have examined the possible cross talk between the N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides in our mapping procedure. We map N_{2} internal tides using two different data sets. The first is the original satellite altimetry SSH data set (Sect. 2.1). The second is the M_{2}-corrected data set. In other words, the M_{2} internal tides are predicted using our empirical model and subtracted from the original data. We find that the resulting N_{2} internal tides from the two data sets are almost the same. The variance of their differences is < 1 % that of the N_{2} internal tides. Likewise, we map M_{2} internal tides using both the original and N_{2}-corrected data sets and find that the impact of N_{2} on M_{2} is negligible. Our analysis reveals that the N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides do not cross talk in our mapping method. This is because the 27-year-long satellite data from 1993 to 2019 are sufficient long to unambiguously separate the N_{2} and M_{2} tidal constituents (about 14 min apart).

## 2.5 Model errors

Model errors in our N_{2} and M_{2} internal tide models are estimated using background internal tides. In contrast to N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides, which are mapped using tidal periods of 12.6583 and 12.4206 h, respectively, background internal tides are mapped using the same satellite altimetry data but for tidal periods between N_{2} and M_{2}. Specifically, we map 13 sets of background internal tides using 13 different tidal periods that are linearly interpolated between N_{2} and M_{2} (Fig. 5). The other mapping parameter, wavenumber (equivalently phase speed), can be obtained using Eq. (3). The same strategy has previously been employed to estimate barotropic tide errors. For example, Ray and Susanto (2016) study the fortnightly tidal cycles (MS_{f} and M_{f}) of tidal mixing using satellite sea surface temperature data. Zaron et al. (2023) study the fortnightly variability in Chl *a* using satellite sea surface color data. In both studies, tidal errors are estimated using signals at fake or false tidal frequencies near the real tidal constituents.

We thus obtain 13 background internal tides in the central Pacific (Fig. 4c, box). Their regional mean SSH amplitudes in this region are 0.8 ± 0.1 mm, compared to 1.66 and 7.75 mm for N_{2} and M_{2} (Fig. 5). Note that the SSH amplitudes of the 13 background internal tides are almost the same,
showing no significant tidal cusps around the N_{2} or M_{2} internal tides. In addition, we have calculated the correlation coefficients among these 15 sets of internal tides (including N_{2} and M_{2}). All correlation coefficients are < 0.05, suggesting that these background internal tides are independent of each other and of the N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides. In other words, background internal tides are signals we obtain where there are no tidal constituents. We suggest that the model errors in N_{2} and M_{2} can be represented by background internal tides. In this study, we pick one tidal period (12.6074 h) for a global run to obtain background internal tides (model errors), considering that a global run is time-consuming. Figure 4c gives the resulting background internal tides (model errors). It reveals that model errors are large in regions of strong mesoscale motions because model errors are mainly leaked mesoscale signals. Figure 4 shows that the N_{2} internal tides are noisier than M_{2} because the small-amplitude N_{2} internal tides are easily affected by model errors. On a global average, the error variance is about 25 % of the N_{2} variance, and only 1 % of the M_{2} variance.

## 2.6 Model evaluation

Our N_{2} and M_{2} internal tide models are evaluated using independent satellite SSH data collected in 2020 and 2021. For each SSH measurement of known time and location, the internal tide signal is predicted using the model under evaluation and subtracted from the SSH measurement. Variance reduction is the variance difference before and after the internal tide correction. The variance reductions for all SSH measurements are binned into 2^{∘} by 2^{∘} boxes. The global map of N_{2} variance reduction is shown in Fig. 6a. The M_{2} internal tide model is evaluated in the same way and shown in Fig. 6b. Note that the color map ranges for N_{2} and M_{2} differ by a factor of 25, that is, the square of the factor of their amplitudes.

In the evaluation, the true N_{2} internal tides (variance ${\mathit{\sigma}}_{{\mathrm{N}}_{\mathrm{2}}}^{\mathrm{2}}$) in the model will remove the N_{2} internal tides in the independent data, leading to positive variance reduction, while the model errors (variance ${\mathit{\sigma}}_{\mathit{\u03f5}}^{\mathrm{2}}$) will increase the variance of the independent data, leading to negative variance reduction. Together, we obtain positive variance reduction where ${\mathit{\sigma}}_{{\mathrm{N}}_{\mathrm{2}}}^{\mathrm{2}}>{\mathit{\sigma}}_{\mathit{\u03f5}}^{\mathrm{2}}$, and negative variance reduction where ${\mathit{\sigma}}_{{\mathrm{N}}_{\mathrm{2}}}^{\mathrm{2}}<{\mathit{\sigma}}_{\mathit{\u03f5}}^{\mathrm{2}}$. Figure 6a shows positive variance reduction in the global ocean, suggesting that the true N_{2} internal tides are greater than model errors. In particular, in regions of strong N_{2} internal tides such as the Hawaiian Ridge and the Amazon continental shelf, patches of positive variance reduction are observed because the strong N_{2} internal tides can overcome model errors, while negative variance reduction usually occurs in regions of weak N_{2} internal tides such as the eastern equatorial Pacific and the Southern Ocean. The regions of strong mesoscale motions are dominated by negative variance reduction, where weak N_{2} internal tides are overwhelmed by large model errors (Fig. 4c). For comparison, Fig. 6b shows that the M_{2} internal tide model causes positive variance reduction throughout the global ocean, except for regions of strong mesoscale motions or strong temporal variation (Zhao, 2021). This is because the strong M_{2} internal tides are almost always greater than the model errors ${\mathit{\sigma}}_{{\mathrm{M}}_{\mathrm{2}}}^{\mathrm{2}}>{\mathit{\sigma}}_{\mathit{\u03f5}}^{\mathrm{2}}$. In summary, our N_{2} internal tide model can reduce variance in some regions, although the N_{2} SSH amplitudes are just a few millimeters.

We further examine the relation between the N_{2} variance reduction shown in Fig. 6a and the variance difference between the N_{2} model and the model error. Figure 6c and d give the N_{2} model variance and the error variance that are computed from Fig. 4a and c, respectively. Note that the N_{2} model variance *σ*^{2} contains both true N_{2} internal tides and errors ${\mathit{\sigma}}^{\mathrm{2}}={\mathit{\sigma}}_{{\mathrm{N}}_{\mathrm{2}}}^{\mathrm{2}}+{\mathit{\sigma}}_{\mathit{\u03f5}}^{\mathrm{2}}$. Under the condition that the N_{2} variance is greater ${\mathit{\sigma}}_{{\mathrm{N}}_{\mathrm{2}}}^{\mathrm{2}}>{\mathit{\sigma}}_{\mathit{\u03f5}}^{\mathrm{2}}$, we should have ${\mathit{\sigma}}^{\mathrm{2}}>\mathrm{2}{\mathit{\sigma}}_{\mathit{\u03f5}}^{\mathrm{2}}$. We thus calculate the variance difference ${\mathit{\sigma}}^{\mathrm{2}}-\mathrm{2}{\mathit{\sigma}}_{\mathit{\u03f5}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ and show the global map in Fig. 6e. To test this relation, we calculate the variance difference ${\mathit{\sigma}}^{\mathrm{2}}-m\cdot {\mathit{\sigma}}_{\mathit{\u03f5}}^{\mathrm{2}}$ for *m* ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 with a step of 0.1. For each resulting variance difference map (e.g., Fig. 6e), we calculate its correlation coefficient with the N_{2} variance reduction (Fig. 6a). We get the best spatial correlation when the factor *m* is 2, consistent with our theoretical analysis. Note that all the above analyses are based on the 2^{∘} by 2^{∘} binned values. Figure 6f shows the mask region where the N_{2} model variance is greater than twice the error variance, indicating regions where the N_{2} model can be used to make internal tide correction. The mask covers regions of strong N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides such as the Hawaiian Ridge, the area off the California coast, the Amazon continental shelf, the western North Pacific, and New Caledonia.

We next examine the performance of the N_{2} and M_{2} internal tide models in making internal tide correction for SWOT. In Fig. 6, the green lines denote the SWOT ground tracks in its daily fast-repeating phase. We interpolate the N_{2} and M_{2} variance reductions onto the SWOT ground tracks (neglecting its swath) and calculate the along-track mean variance reductions. For N_{2}, the mean variance reductions in and outside the mask region are 0.73 and −0.25 mm^{2}, respectively. The negative variance reduction suggests that the N_{2} model does not work well outside the mask region. Fortunately, the N_{2} model can make internal tide correction in the mask region where the N_{2} internal tides can overcome model errors. The variance reductions caused by the N_{2} model seem small, but keep in mind that (1) internal tides and sub-mesoscale motions both have millimeter-scale SSH amplitudes and (2) internal tides are much stronger in their source regions. For M_{2}, the along-track mean variance reductions in and outside the mask region are 25.6 and 2.5 mm^{2}, respectively. They suggest that the M_{2} model performs well both in and outside the mask region because the M_{2} internal tides dominate errors throughout the global ocean.

## 3.1 Global distribution

Our mode-1 N_{2} model reveals that N_{2} internal tides are widespread in the global ocean (Fig. 4a). In the Indian Ocean, they are observed in the Arabian Sea, the Bay of Bengal, and the Madagascar–Mascarene region. In the Pacific Ocean, N_{2} internal tides occur in regions such as the French Polynesian Ridge, the Hawaiian Ridge, the Indonesian seas, the western South Pacific, and the western North Pacific. In the Atlantic Ocean, N_{2} internal tides appear in regions including the Azores region, the Amazon shelf, the Bay of Biscay, and the Vitória–Trindade Ridge. Our M_{2} model reveals that mode-1 M_{2} internal tides are observed in the same regions (Fig. 4b). The N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides have similar spatial patterns, but the N_{2} amplitudes are about 20 % of the M_{2} amplitudes. To further quantify their relation, we give in Fig. 7a the scatterplot of the N_{2} and M_{2} SSH amplitudes. It shows that the N_{2} and M_{2} amplitudes largely follow the diagonal line with a ratio of 5. Their correlation coefficient is 0.69 (*R* in MATLAB function *corrcoef*).

We extract the N_{2} and M_{2} barotropic tides from TPXO.8 (Egbert and Erofeeva, 2002) and show them in Fig. 8. We find that the N_{2} and M_{2} barotropic tides have similar spatial patterns and that the N_{2} amplitudes are about 20 % of the M_{2} amplitudes. We examine the relation between the N_{2} and M_{2} barotropic tides as well. Figure 7b shows the scatterplot of the N_{2} and M_{2} barotropic amplitudes. It shows that N_{2} and M_{2} have a very tight relation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.96. Egbert and Ray (2003) show that the M_{2} and N_{2} barotropic-to-baroclinic energy conversion maps have similar spatial patterns and that their amplitudes differ by a factor of 25 (see their Fig. 1). The N_{2} and M_{2} relation (spatial pattern and amplitude ratio) is the same for both barotropic and baroclinic tides. Because N_{2} and M_{2} have close tidal periods (12.6583 and 12.4206 h), their generations over the same topographic features should be the same (distinguishing their slight differences may improve our understanding of internal tide dynamics in the future). In addition, it is reasonable that the N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides have a relatively weak relation (Fig. 7a) because the long-range propagation of internal tides is affected by an inhomogeneous ocean environment.

## 3.2 Long-range beams

In this section, we study the long-range mode-1 N_{2} internal tidal beams. We have fitted five mode-1 N_{2} internal tidal waves at each grid point by plane wave analysis. Taking advantage of the five-wave fits, we can decompose the N_{2} internal tide field into the northward (0–180^{∘} counterclockwise from due east) and southward (180–360^{∘}) components by propagation direction. Each component contains internal tidal waves with propagation directions falling in the given range (Fig. 9). The decomposed components clearly show well-defined long-range N_{2} internal tidal beams, which are characterized by larger amplitudes and cross-beam co-phase lines (not shown here for clarity; see Figs. 10 and 11). There are numerous long-range N_{2} internal tidal beams, which radiate from the strong generation sites mentioned above. For example, northward N_{2} beams are observed to originate from the French Polynesian Ridge, the Macquarie Ridge, and the Amazon shelf. Southward N_{2} beams are observed to originate from the Andaman Islands, the Lombok Strait, the Hawaiian Ridge, the French Polynesian Ridge, the Mendocino Ridge, and the Azores, among others. Note that the M_{2} long-range internal tidal beams have been well studied in previous studies (Zhao et al., 2016, Fig. 5 therein). To avoid repetition, the M_{2} internal tidal beams are not shown here. Together, we observe that the N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides have similar long-range beams. In this study, we examine two long-range internal tidal beams as examples.

First, we examine the southward internal tides from the Amukta Pass, Alaska. The M_{2} long-range beam from Amukta Pass has been studied recently (Zhao, 2022b). Figure 10a shows the southward N_{2} internal tides in the central North Pacific (Fig. 9b, blue box). For comparison, the southward M_{2} internal tides are shown in Fig. 10b. Both tidal constituents can travel from the Aleutian island chain to the Hawaiian Ridge over 3000 km away. Their propagation directions are about −78^{∘} from due east. The black lines in Fig. 10 show the 0 and 180^{∘} co-phase charts. Figure 10c shows their phase difference, which increases with propagation because N_{2} internal tides travel faster than M_{2} internal tides according to Eq. (3). In the propagation, their phase difference increases with propagation. Along the dashed line from source (52.6^{∘} N, 189^{∘} E) to far field (26^{∘} N, 195^{∘} E), their phase difference increases from 65 to 305^{∘}. The overall phase change is 240^{∘}. It takes about 18 tidal cycles for the N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides to travel along the path.

Figure 11 shows southward internals tides in the region off the California coast (Fig. 9b, cyan box). This region is chosen for a detailed investigation because it contains one site for the SWOT calibration/validation field campaign. The green lines in this figure indicate the SWOT swaths in its fast-repeating phase (Wang et al., 2022). The crossover region of the ascending and descending swaths is the SWOT calibration/validation site. This region is dominated by the southward internal tides from the Mendocino Ridge. Note that this region is also affected by internal tides in other propagation directions (Zhao et al., 2019). Additionally, there are southwestward internal tides from the Monterey Bay. The two internal tidal beams intersect around the SWOT campaign site. As explained earlier, our N_{2} model can make internal tide correction for SWOT. Figure 11 shows that N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides are very similar, although the N_{2} fluxes are much weaker. Both N_{2} and M_{2} beams can be tracked from 40 to 20^{∘} N for > 2000 km. They both bifurcate around 32^{∘} N near Fieberling seamounts (32.5^{∘} N, 232.3^{∘} E) for unknown reasons. The dashed line delineates the beam from 40.3 to 22^{∘} N along 128^{∘} W. This line is about 2000 km long. Along this line, the N_{2} and M_{2} phase difference increases from 40 to 160^{∘} over about 14 M_{2} or N_{2} tidal cycles.

## 3.3 Energy and energy flux

We calculate the depth-integrated energy flux of mode-1 N_{2} internal tide from their SSH amplitudes and a transfer function (*F*_{n}). The transfer function is calculated using the WOA18 climatological hydrography and the Sturm–Liouville equation (Zhao and Alford, 2009; Zhao et al., 2016). The same calculation method has also been derived by Geoffroy and Nycander (2022). In this study, we follow our method (previously for mode-1 M_{2} internal tides) to obtain the transfer function for mode-1 N_{2} internal tides. It is a function of ocean depth, tidal frequency, mode number, latitude, and stratification. The transfer functions for N_{2} and M_{2} are very close because their tidal periods are close. At each grid point, we thus obtain five energy fluxes for the five internal tidal waves following $F=\frac{\mathrm{1}}{\mathrm{2}}{F}_{n}{A}^{\mathrm{2}}$, where *A* is the SSH amplitude. The vector sum of the five energy fluxes gives the final energy flux at this site. In this study, we compare the N_{2} and M_{2} internal tide energy fluxes in two regions. An interested reader can examine other ocean regions. We show that their energy fluxes have similar spatial patterns. The results show that the mode-1 N_{2} internal tides can be observed by satellite altimetry, although they are much weaker than the M_{2} internal tides. Following the same procedure, we have computed the depth-integrated internal tide energies from SSH amplitudes. The globally integrated area-weighted energies for the N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides are 1.8 and 30.9 PJ, respectively. The N_{2}-to-M_{2} ratio is about 5.8 %, larger than the theoretical value of 4 % because N_{2} contains larger error variance. As explained earlier, the error variance is about 25 % of the N_{2} variance but only 1 % of the M_{2} variance.

Figure 12 shows the N_{2} and M_{2} energy fluxes in the western South Pacific. In this study, it is trimmed to 30^{∘} S–0^{∘}, 145^{∘} E–125^{∘} W. Colors show flux magnitudes, and black arrows show flux vectors. This region is chosen because (1) it features various topographic obstacles such as mid-ocean ridges and island chains and (2) the New Caledonia region is one site for SWOT calibration/validation field experiments (Bendinger et al., 2023). There are numerous N_{2} and M_{2} internal tidal beams in this region. They are dominantly generated over topographic features. For example, N_{2} and M_{2} internal tidal beams radiate from many straits surrounding the Coral Sea (Tchilibou et al., 2020). The internal tidal beams can be in any horizontal propagation direction. From the French Polynesian Ridge, internal tides mainly propagate southward and northward. From the Kermadec Arc and New Caledonia, the outgoing internal tidal beams usually travel eastward or westward. The energy fluxes of N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides have similar spatial patterns. Figure 12 shows seven SWOT swaths in this region (green lines). Among them, the two swaths in the New Caledonia region (black box) overlap with strong N_{2} internal tides whose contribution cannot be neglected. In addition, the two swaths cross the French Polynesian Ridge, where one should pay an attention to N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides in the study of mesoscale and sub-mesoscale processes.

Figure 13 shows the N_{2} and M_{2} energy fluxes in the North Atlantic Ocean (2^{∘}S–53^{∘} N, 58–3^{∘} W). Figure 13 is in the same format as Fig. 12. Internal tides in this region have attracted much attention in recent years (Vic et al., 2018; Köhler et al., 2019; Löb et al., 2020). In particular, internal tides on the Amazon continental shelf have been intensively studied recently, partly because of the co-existence of internal tides and internal solitary waves (Egbert and Erofeeva, 2021; Tchilibou et al., 2022; Assene et al., 2023). Our satellite observation reveals that strong N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides occur around notable topographic features including the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, the Amazon continental shelf, the Azores region, the Bay of Biscay, the Canary Islands, and the Cabo Verde islands. The longest internal tidal beams for both N_{2} and M_{2} are the southward internal tidal beams from the Azores (Zhao, 2016; Köhler et al., 2019). The two beams can be tracked over 2000 km. In this region, there are four SWOT swaths in its fast-repeating phase, which overlap remarkable N_{2} and M_{2} internal tidal beams.

In this study, we constructed empirical models for mode-1 N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides from satellite altimetry. Among them, N_{2} is the larger lunar elliptical semidiurnal constituent and the fifth largest oceanic tidal constituent. It is induced by the Moon's elliptical orbit. Its amplitudes are about 20 % of the M_{2} amplitudes. The mode-1 N_{2} internal tides have sub-centimeter-scale SSH amplitudes. We can extract weak N_{2} internal tides because we use a larger altimetry data set and a newly developed mapping procedure. First, we use the multiyear multi-satellite altimetry data from 1993 to 2019. The combined data are about 100 satellite years long, which can significantly suppress non-tidal errors. Second, we extract mode-1 N_{2} internal tides by a three-step mapping procedure, which cleans internal tides using known frequency and wavenumbers of the target internal tide. In consequence, satellite altimetry can observe mode-1 N_{2} internal tides with millimeter-scale SSH amplitudes. Our N_{2} internal tide model is still noisy. Future improvements can be made with more and more satellite altimetry data becoming available.

We estimated errors in the N_{2} and M_{2} internal tide models using background internal tides. Specifically, background internal tides are mapped using the same altimetry data but for tidal periods between N_{2} and M_{2}. In this study, we construct a global map of model errors using a tidal period of 12.6074 (N_{2} minus 3 min). The model errors are usually < 1 mm in the global ocean, with the global mean error being about 0.7 mm. Large errors usually occur in regions of strong mesoscale motions, since the model errors mainly come from the leaked mesoscale signals. On a global average, the error variance is about 25 % of the N_{2} model variance but only 1 % of the M_{2} model variance.

Our satellite observations revealed some basic features of the global N_{2} internal tides. We found that the N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides have similar spatial patterns and that the N_{2} amplitudes are about 20 % of the M_{2} amplitudes. Both features are determined by their barotropic counterparts. We found that both N_{2} and M_{2} internal tides can propagate hundreds to thousands of kilometers in the open ocean but at different phase speeds. We examined regional N_{2} internal tides and revealed rich information on their generation and propagation. We suggest that including N_{2} internal tides can better simulate the temporal variation in internal tide energetics with the lunar elliptical orbit.

Our N_{2} and M_{2} internal tide models have been evaluated using independent altimetry data in 2020 and 2021. The M_{2} model can cause variance reduction throughout the global ocean because the M_{2} internal tides dominate the model errors. In contrast, the N_{2} model can cause variance reduction in regions of strong N_{2} internal tides where they can overcome errors. We found that the N_{2} model performs well in regions where the N_{2} model variance is greater than twice the error variance, which means that the true N_{2} variance is greater than the error variance. We showed that the N_{2} and M_{2} models work well in the mask region along the SWOT fast-repeating tracks, which suggests that they can make internal tide correction for SWOT.

Last but not least, we demonstrated that our mapping technique can construct a reliable mode-1 N_{2} internal tide model using 100 satellite years of altimetry data. We have applied our mapping technique to the first baroclinic mode of other minor tidal constituents and higher baroclinic mode of other major tidal constituents and obtained clear internal tide signals. We have tried mapping mode-2 N_{2} internal tides around the Hawaiian Ridge (18–28^{∘} N, 185–205^{∘} E). However, the resulting model is noisy, as expected. In this region, the mean amplitude of mode-1 N_{2} internal tides is about 2.5 mm. The mean mode-2 N_{2} amplitude is estimated to be 1 mm, using a ratio of 2.5 from mode-1 and mode-2 M_{2} internal tides. The ∼ 1 mm mode-2 N_{2} internal tides cannot overcome the ∼ 0.7 mm noise. It is expected that the low-noise SWOT data along 120 km wide swaths will improve the observation of minor tidal constituents and higher baroclinic modes.

The satellite altimetry along-track data are from the Copernicus Marine Service (https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00146, Satellite observations, 2020a). The satellite altimetry gridded data are from the Copernicus Marine Service (https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00148, Satellite observations, 2020b). The SWOT orbit data are from the AVISO website (https://www.aviso.altimetry.fr/en/missions/current-missions/swot, last access: 18 September 2015). The World Ocean Atlas 2018 is produced and made available by NOAA National Oceanographic Data Center (https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/woa18/, last access: 1 May 2020). The mode-1 N_{2} internal tide model developed in this study is freely available (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23243633.v1, Zhao, 2023).

The author has declared that there are no competing interests.

Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The author thanks Katsuro Katsumata, Clément Vic, and two anonymous referees for their constructive suggestions that have greatly improved this paper.

This research has been supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (grant nos. NNX17AH57G and 80NSSC18K0771).

This paper was edited by Katsuro Katsumata and reviewed by Clément Vic and two anonymous referees.

Arbic, B. K.: Incorporating tides and internal gravity waves within global ocean general circulation models: A review, Prog. Oceanogr., 206, 102824, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102824, 2022. a

Assene, F., Koch-Larrouy, A., Dadou, I., Tchilibou, M., Morvan, G., Chanut, J., Vantrepotte, V., Allain, D., and Tran, T.-K.: Internal tides off the Amazon shelf Part I : importance for the structuring of ocean temperature during two contrasted seasons, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-418, 2023. a

Bendinger, A., Cravatte, S., Gourdeau, L., Brodeau, L., Albert, A., Tchilibou, M., Lyard, F., and Vic, C.: Regional modeling of internal tide dynamics around New Caledonia: energetics and sea surface height signature, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-361, 2023. a

Boyer, T. P., García, H. E., Locarnini, R. A., Zweng, M. M., Mishonov, A. V., Reagan, J. R., Weathers, K. A., Baranova, O. K., Paver, C. R., Seidov, D., and Smolyar, I. V.: World Ocean Atlas 2018, Tech. Rep., NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/archive/accession/NCEI-WOA18 (last access: 1 May 2020), 2018. a

Byun, D.-S. and Hart, D. E.: A monthly tidal envelope classification for
semidiurnal regimes in terms of the relative proportions of the S_{2},
N_{2}, and M_{2} constituents, Ocean Sci., 16, 965–977,
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-965-2020, 2020. a

Chelton, D. B., deSzoeke, R. A., Schlax, M. G., El Naggar, K., and Siwertz, N.: Geographical variability of the first baroclinic Rossby radius of deformation, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 433–460, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028<0433:GVOTFB>2.0.CO;2, 1998. a

de Lavergne, C., Vic, C., Madec, G., Roquet, F., Waterhouse, A. F., Whalen, C. B., Cuypers, Y., Bouruet-Aubertot, P., Ferron, B., and Hibiya, T.: A parameterization of local and remote tidal mixing, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, e2020MS002065, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002065, 2020. a

Doodson, A. T.: The harmonic development of the tide-generating potential, Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 100, 305–329, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1921.0088, 1921. a, b, c

Dushaw, B. D.: An empirical model for mode-1 internal tides derived from satellite altimetry: Computing accurate tidal predictions at arbitrary points over the world oceans, Tech. Rep., Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, 2015. a, b, c

Dushaw, B. D., Howe, B. M., Cornuelle, B. D., Worcester, P. F., and Luther, D. S.: Barotropic and Baroclinic Tides in the Central North Pacific Ocean Determined from Long-Range Reciprocal Acoustic Transmissions, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 25, 631–647, 1995. a

Egbert, G. D. and Erofeeva, S. Y.: Efficient inverse modeling of barotropic ocean tides, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 19, 183–204, 2002. a

Egbert, G. D. and Erofeeva, S. Y.: An approach to empirical mapping of incoherent internal tides with altimetry data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL095863, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095863, 2021. a

Egbert, G. D. and Ray, R. D.: Significant dissipation of tidal energy in the deep ocean inferred from satellite altimeter data, Nature, 405, 775–778, https://doi.org/10.1038/35015531, 2000. a

Egbert, G. D. and Ray, R. D.: Semi-diurnal and diurnal tidal dissipation from TOPEX/Poseidon altimetry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1907, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017676, 2003. a

Fu, L.-L. and Ubelmann, C.: On the transition from profile altimeter to swath altimeter for observing global ocean surface topography, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 31, 560–568, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00109.1, 2014. a

Geoffroy, G. and Nycander, J.: Global mapping of the nonstationary semidiurnal internal tide using Argo data, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 127, e2021JC018283, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JC018283, 2022. a

Gill, A. E.: Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics, Academic Press, ISBN 9780122835223, 662 pp., 1982. a

Jayne, S. R. and St Laurent, L. C.: Parameterizing tidal dissipation over rough topography, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 811–814, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012044, 2001. a

Kelly, S. M.: The vertical mode decomposition of surface and internal tides in the presence of a free surface and arbitrary topography, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 46, 3777–3788, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-16-0131.1, 2016. a

Kelly, S. M., Waterhouse, A. F., and Savage, A. C.: Global dynamics of the
stationary M_{2} mode-1 internal tide, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48,
e2020GL091692, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091692, 2021. a

Köhler, J., Walter, M., Mertens, C., Stiehler, J., Li, Z., Zhao, Z., von Storch, J.-S., and Rhein, M.: Energy flux observations in an internal tide beam in the eastern North Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 124, 5747–5764, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015156, 2019. a, b

Löb, J., Köhler, J., Mertens, C., Walter, M., Li, Z., von Storch, J.-S., Zhao, Z., and Rhein, M.: Observations of the low-mode internal tide and its interaction with mesoscale flow south of the Azores, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 125, e2019JC015879, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015879, 2020. a

MacKinnon, J. A., Zhao, Z., Whalen, C. B., Waterhouse, A. F., Trossman, D. S., Sun, O. M., Laurent, L. C. S., Simmons, H. L., Polzin, K., Pinkel, R., Pickering, A., Norton, N. J., Nash, J. D., Musgrave, R., Merchant, L. M., Melet, A. V., Mater, B., Legg, S., Large, W. G., Kunze, E., Klymak, J. M., Jochum, M., Jayne, S. R., Hallberg, R. W., Griffies, S. M., Diggs, S., Danabasoglu, G., Chassignet, E. P., Buijsman, M. C., Bryan, F. O., Briegleb, B. P., Barna, A., Arbic, B. K., Ansong, J. K., and Alford, M. H.: Climate process team on internal wave-driven ocean mixing, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 2429–2454, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0030.1, 2017. a

Melet, A., Legg, S., and Hallberg, R.: Climatic impacts of parameterized local and remote tidal mixing, J. Clim., 29, 3473–3500, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0153.1, 2016. a

Morrow, R., Fu, L.-L., Ardhuin, F., Benkiran, M., Chapron, B., Cosme, E., d'Ovidio, F., Farrar, J. T., Gille, S. T., Lapeyre, G., Le Traon, P.-Y., Pascual, A., Ponte, A., Qiu, B., Rascle, N., Ubelmann, C., Wang, J., and Zaron, E. D.: Global observations of fine-scale ocean surface topography with the surface water and ocean topography (SWOT) mission, Front. Mar. Sci., 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00232, 2019. a

Munk, W. H. and Wunsch, C.: Abyssal recipes II: Energetics of tidal and wind mixing, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 45, 1977–2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(98)00070-3, 1998. a

Pawlowicz, R., Beardsley, B., and Lentz, S.: Classical tidal harmonic analysis including error estimates in MATLAB using T_TIDE, Comput. Geosci., 28, 929–937, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(02)00013-4, 2002. a, b

Pollmann, F., Nycander, J., Eden, C., and Olbers, D.: Resolving the horizontal direction of internal tide generation, J. Fluid Mech., 864, 381–407, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.9, 2019. a

Pujol, M.-I., Faugère, Y., Taburet, G., Dupuy, S., Pelloquin, C., Ablain, M., and Picot, N.: DUACS DT2014: the new multi-mission altimeter data set reprocessed over 20 years, Ocean Sci., 12, 1067–1090, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-1067-2016, 2016. a, b

Qiu, B., Chen, S., Klein, P., Wang, J., Torres, H., Fu, L.-L., and Menemenlis, D.: Seasonality in transition scale from balanced to unbalanced motions in the world ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 48, 591–605, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0169.1, 2018. a

Ray, R. D. and Byrne, D. A.: Bottom pressure tides along a line in the southeast Atlantic Ocean and comparisons with satellite altimetry, Ocean Dynam., 60, 1167–1176, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-010-0316-0, 2010. a

Ray, R. D. and Susanto, R. D.: Tidal mixing signatures in the Indonesian Seas from high-resolution sea surface temperature data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 8115–8123, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069485, 2016. a

Ray, R. D. and Zaron, E.: M_{2} internal tides and their observed wavenumber
spectra from satellite altimetry, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 46,
3–22, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-15-0065.1, 2016. a

Satellite observations: Global Ocean Along Track L 3 Sea Surface Heights Reprocessed 1993 Ongoing Tailored For Data Assimilation, Coperncius Marine Service [data set], https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00146, 2020a. a

Satellite observations: Global Ocean Gridded L 4 Sea Surface Heights And Derived Variables Reprocessed 1993 Ongoing, Coperncius Marine Service [data set], https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00148, 2020b. a

Smith, W. H. F. and Sandwell, D. T.: Global sea floor topography from satellite altimetry and ship depth soundings, Science, 277, 1956–1962, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5334.1956, 1997. a

Taburet, G., Sanchez-Roman, A., Ballarotta, M., Pujol, M.-I., Legeais, J.-F., Fournier, F., Faugere, Y., and Dibarboure, G.: DUACS DT2018: 25 years of reprocessed sea level altimetry products, Ocean Sci., 15, 1207–1224, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1207-2019, 2019. a

Tchilibou, M., Gourdeau, L., Lyard, F., Morrow, R., Koch Larrouy, A., Allain, D., and Djath, B.: Internal tides in the Solomon Sea in contrasted ENSO conditions, Ocean Sci., 16, 615–635, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-615-2020, 2020. a

Tchilibou, M., Koch-Larrouy, A., Barbot, S., Lyard, F., Morel, Y., Jouanno, J., and Morrow, R.: Internal tides off the Amazon shelf during two contrasted seasons: interactions with background circulation and SSH imprints, Ocean Sci., 18, 1591–1618, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1591-2022, 2022. a

Ubelmann, C., Carrere, L., Durand, C., Dibarboure, G., Faugère, Y., Ballarotta, M., Briol, F., and Lyard, F.: Simultaneous estimation of ocean mesoscale and coherent internal tide sea surface height signatures from the global altimetry record, Ocean Sci., 18, 469–481, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-469-2022, 2022. a

Vic, C., Naveira Garabato, A. C., Green, J. A. M., Spingys, C., Forryan, A., Zhao, Z., and Sharples, J.: The lifecycle of semidiurnal internal tides over the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 48, 61–80, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0121.1, 2018. a

Vic, C., Naveira Garabato, A. C., Green, J. A. M., Waterhouse, A. F., Zhao, Z., Melet, A., de Lavergne, C., Buijsman, M. C., and Stephenson, G. R.: Deep-ocean mixing driven by small-scale internal tides, Nat. Commun., 10, 2099, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10149-5, 2019. a

Wang, J., Fu, L.-L., Qiu, B., Menemenlis, D., Farrar, J. T., Chao, Y., Thompson, A. F., and Flexas, M. M.: An observing system simulation experiment for the calibration and validation of the surface water ocean topography sea surface height measurement using in situ platforms, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 35, 281–297, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-17-0076.1, 2018. a

Wang, J., Fu, L.-L., Haines, B., Lankhorst, M., Lucas, A. J., Farrar, J. T., Send, U., Meinig, C., Schofield, O., Ray, R., Archer, M., Aragon, D., Bigorre, S., Chao, Y., Kerfoot, J., Pinkel, R., Sandwell, D., and Stalin, S.: On the development of SWOT in situ calibration/validation for short-wavelength ocean topography, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 39, 595–617, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-21-0039.1, 2022. a

Whalen, C. B., de Lavergne, C., Naveira Garabato, A. C., Klymak, J. M., MacKinnon, J. A., and Sheen, K. L.: Internal wave-driven mixing: governing processes and consequences for climate, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1, 606–621, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0097-z, 2020. a

Wood, F. J.: The strategic role of perigean spring tides: In nautical history and North American coastal flooding, 1635–1976, Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Survey, https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/16922/noaa_16922_DS1.pdf (last access: 5 July 2023), 1978. a

Wunsch, C.: Internal tides in the ocean, Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 13, 167–182, 1975. a

Zaron, E. D.: Baroclinic tidal sea level from exact-repeating mission altimetry, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 49, 193–210, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-18-0127.1, 2019. a

Zaron, E. D., Capuano, T. A., and Koch-Larrouy, A.: Fortnightly variability of
Chl *a* in the Indonesian Seas, Ocean Sci., 19, 43–55,
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-43-2023, 2023. a

Zhao, Z.: Internal tide radiation from the Luzon Strait, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 119, 5434–5448, https://doi.org/10.1024/2014JC010014, 2014. a

Zhao, Z.: Internal tide oceanic tomography, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 9157–9164, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070567, 2016. a

Zhao, Z.: Southward internal tides in the northeastern South China Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean., 125, e2020JC01654, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016554, 2020. a

Zhao, Z.: Seasonal mode-1 M_{2} internal tides from satellite altimetry,
J. Phys. Oceanogr., 51, 3015–3035,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-21-0001.1, 2021. a, b

Zhao, Z.: Satellite estimates of mode-1 M_{2} internal tides uisng nonrepeat
altimetry missions, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 52, 3065–3076,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-21-0287.1, 2022a. a, b

Zhao, Z.: Development of the yearly mode-1 M_{2} internal tide model in 2019,
J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 39, 463–478,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-21-0116.1, 2022b. a, b, c

Zhao, Z.: The global mode-1 N_{2} internal tide model, Figshare [data set], https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23243633.v1, 2023.
a

Zhao, Z. and Alford, M. H.: New altimetric estimates of mode-1 M_{2} internal
tides in the central North Pacific Ocean, J. Phys.
Oceanogr., 39, 1669–1684, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JPO3922.1, 2009. a, b

Zhao, Z., Alford, M. H., Girton, J. B., Rainville, L., and Simmons, H. L.:
Global observations of open-ocean mode-1 M_{2} internal tides, J.
Phys. Oceanogr., 46, 1657–1684, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-15-0105.1, 2016. a, b, c, d, e

Zhao, Z., Wang, J., Menemenlis, D., Fu, L.-L., Chen, S., and Qiu, B.:
Decomposition of the multimodal multidirectional M_{2} internal tide field,
J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 36, 1157–1173,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-19-0022.1, 2019. a

_{2}internal tides, the fifth largest tidal constituent, are observed using 100 satellite years of SSH data from 1993 to 2019 by a new mapping procedure.