Ocean Science
Ocean Science
OS
Articles | Volume 16, issue 1
Articles | Volume 16, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-45-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-45-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Articles | Volume 16, issue 1
Research article
 | 
08 Jan 2020
Research article |  | 08 Jan 2020

Implications of different nitrogen input sources for potential production and carbon flux estimates in the coastal Gulf of Mexico (GOM) and Korean Peninsula coastal waters

Jongsun Kim, Piers Chapman, Gilbert Rowe, Steven F. DiMarco, and Daniel C. O. Thornton

Viewed

Total article views: 2,807 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,799 899 109 2,807 144 158
  • HTML: 1,799
  • PDF: 899
  • XML: 109
  • Total: 2,807
  • BibTeX: 144
  • EndNote: 158
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 May 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 May 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,807 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,473 with geography defined and 334 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 08 Nov 2025
Download
Short summary
We used a simple nitrogen-based box model to estimate production in the coastal northern Gulf of Mexico and off the west of the Korean Peninsula, which receive nitrogen in different forms. The Gulf of Mexico gets almost all its nitrogen from rivers, while atmosphere and groundwater discharges are also contributed in Korea. Production in both areas decreased away from river mouths, and we identified three zones with different productivity that vary in size as river flow and other factors change.
Read more
Share