Articles | Volume 14, issue 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-1057-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-1057-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Radiational tides: their double-counting in storm surge forecasts and contribution to the Highest Astronomical Tide
National Oceanography Centre, Joseph Proudman Building, 6 Brownlow
St, Liverpool, UK
Maialen Irazoqui Apecechea
Deltares, Boussinesqweg 1, Delft, the Netherlands
Andrew Saulter
Met Office, Fitzroy Road, Exeter, UK
Kevin J. Horsburgh
National Oceanography Centre, Joseph Proudman Building, 6 Brownlow
St, Liverpool, UK
Related authors
David Byrne, Jeff Polton, Enda O'Dea, and Joanne Williams
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3749–3764, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3749-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3749-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Validation is a crucial step during the development of models for ocean simulation. The purpose of validation is to assess how accurate a model is. It is most commonly done by comparing output from a model to actual observations. In this paper, we introduce and demonstrate usage of the COAsT Python package to standardise the validation process for physical ocean models. We also discuss our five guiding principles for standardised validation.
Ed Hawkins, Philip Brohan, Samantha N. Burgess, Stephen Burt, Gilbert P. Compo, Suzanne L. Gray, Ivan D. Haigh, Hans Hersbach, Kiki Kuijjer, Oscar Martínez-Alvarado, Chesley McColl, Andrew P. Schurer, Laura Slivinski, and Joanne Williams
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1465–1482, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1465-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1465-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We examine a severe windstorm that occurred in February 1903 and caused significant damage in the UK and Ireland. Using newly digitized weather observations from the time of the storm, combined with a modern weather forecast model, allows us to determine why this storm caused so much damage. We demonstrate that the event is one of the most severe windstorms to affect this region since detailed records began. The approach establishes a new tool to improve assessments of risk from extreme weather.
Joanne Williams, C. W. Hughes, M. E. Tamisiea, and S. D. P. Williams
Ocean Sci., 10, 701–718, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-701-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-701-2014, 2014
C. W. Hughes, Joanne Williams, A. C. Coward, and B. A. de Cuevas
Ocean Sci., 10, 215–225, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-215-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-215-2014, 2014
Joanne Williams and Chris W. Hughes
Ocean Sci., 9, 111–119, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-111-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-111-2013, 2013
David Byrne, Jeff Polton, Enda O'Dea, and Joanne Williams
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3749–3764, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3749-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3749-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Validation is a crucial step during the development of models for ocean simulation. The purpose of validation is to assess how accurate a model is. It is most commonly done by comparing output from a model to actual observations. In this paper, we introduce and demonstrate usage of the COAsT Python package to standardise the validation process for physical ocean models. We also discuss our five guiding principles for standardised validation.
Nieves G. Valiente, Andrew Saulter, Breogan Gomez, Christopher Bunney, Jian-Guo Li, Tamzin Palmer, and Christine Pequignet
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2515–2538, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2515-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2515-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We document the Met Office operational global and regional wave models which provide wave forecasts up to 7 d ahead. Our models present coarser resolution offshore to higher resolution near the coastline. The increased resolution led to replication of the extremes but to some overestimation during modal conditions. If currents are included, wave directions and long period swells near the coast are significantly improved. New developments focus on the optimisation of the models with resolution.
Ed Hawkins, Philip Brohan, Samantha N. Burgess, Stephen Burt, Gilbert P. Compo, Suzanne L. Gray, Ivan D. Haigh, Hans Hersbach, Kiki Kuijjer, Oscar Martínez-Alvarado, Chesley McColl, Andrew P. Schurer, Laura Slivinski, and Joanne Williams
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 1465–1482, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1465-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-1465-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We examine a severe windstorm that occurred in February 1903 and caused significant damage in the UK and Ireland. Using newly digitized weather observations from the time of the storm, combined with a modern weather forecast model, allows us to determine why this storm caused so much damage. We demonstrate that the event is one of the most severe windstorms to affect this region since detailed records began. The approach establishes a new tool to improve assessments of risk from extreme weather.
Diego Bruciaferri, Marina Tonani, Isabella Ascione, Fahad Al Senafi, Enda O'Dea, Helene T. Hewitt, and Andrew Saulter
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8705–8730, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8705-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8705-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
More accurate predictions of the Gulf's ocean dynamics are needed. We investigate the impact on the predictive skills of a numerical shelf sea model of the Gulf after changing a few key aspects. Increasing the lateral and vertical resolution and optimising the vertical coordinate system to best represent the leading physical processes at stake significantly improve the accuracy of the simulated dynamics. Additional work may be needed to get real benefit from using a more realistic bathymetry.
Juan Manuel Castillo, Huw W. Lewis, Akhilesh Mishra, Ashis Mitra, Jeff Polton, Ashley Brereton, Andrew Saulter, Alex Arnold, Segolene Berthou, Douglas Clark, Julia Crook, Ananda Das, John Edwards, Xiangbo Feng, Ankur Gupta, Sudheer Joseph, Nicholas Klingaman, Imranali Momin, Christine Pequignet, Claudio Sanchez, Jennifer Saxby, and Maria Valdivieso da Costa
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4193–4223, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4193-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4193-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A new environmental modelling system has been developed to represent the effect of feedbacks between atmosphere, land, and ocean in the Indian region. Different approaches to simulating tropical cyclones Titli and Fani are demonstrated. It is shown that results are sensitive to the way in which the ocean response to cyclone evolution is captured in the system. Notably, we show how a more rigorous formulation for the near-surface energy budget can be included when air–sea coupling is included.
Huw W. Lewis, Juan Manuel Castillo Sanchez, Alex Arnold, Joachim Fallmann, Andrew Saulter, Jennifer Graham, Mike Bush, John Siddorn, Tamzin Palmer, Adrian Lock, John Edwards, Lucy Bricheno, Alberto Martínez-de la Torre, and James Clark
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 2357–2400, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2357-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2357-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
In the real world the atmosphere, oceans and land surface are closely interconnected, and yet the prediction systems used for weather and ocean forecasting tend to treat them in isolation. This paper describes the third version of a regional modelling system which aims to represent the feedback processes between sky, sea and land. The main innovation introduced in this version enables waves to affect the underlying ocean. Coupled results from four different month-long simulations are analysed.
Huw W. Lewis, Juan Manuel Castillo Sanchez, John Siddorn, Robert R. King, Marina Tonani, Andrew Saulter, Peter Sykes, Anne-Christine Pequignet, Graham P. Weedon, Tamzin Palmer, Joanna Staneva, and Lucy Bricheno
Ocean Sci., 15, 669–690, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-669-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-669-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Forecasts of ocean temperature, salinity, currents, and sea height can be improved by linking state-of-the-art ocean and wave models, so that they can interact to better represent the real world. We test this approach in an ocean model of north-west Europe which can simulate small-scale details of the ocean state. The intention is to implement the system described in this study for operational use so that improved information can be provided to users of ocean forecast data.
Huw W. Lewis, Juan Manuel Castillo Sanchez, Jennifer Graham, Andrew Saulter, Jorge Bornemann, Alex Arnold, Joachim Fallmann, Chris Harris, David Pearson, Steven Ramsdale, Alberto Martínez-de la Torre, Lucy Bricheno, Eleanor Blyth, Victoria A. Bell, Helen Davies, Toby R. Marthews, Clare O'Neill, Heather Rumbold, Enda O'Dea, Ashley Brereton, Karen Guihou, Adrian Hines, Momme Butenschon, Simon J. Dadson, Tamzin Palmer, Jason Holt, Nick Reynard, Martin Best, John Edwards, and John Siddorn
Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1–42, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
In the real world the atmosphere, oceans and land surface are closely interconnected, and yet prediction systems tend to treat them in isolation. Those feedbacks are often illustrated in natural hazards, such as when strong winds lead to large waves and coastal damage, or when prolonged rainfall leads to saturated ground and high flowing rivers. For the first time, we have attempted to represent some of the feedbacks between sky, sea and land within a high-resolution forecast system for the UK.
Heather Cannaby, Matthew D. Palmer, Tom Howard, Lucy Bricheno, Daley Calvert, Justin Krijnen, Richard Wood, Jonathan Tinker, Chris Bunney, James Harle, Andrew Saulter, Clare O'Neill, Clare Bellingham, and Jason Lowe
Ocean Sci., 12, 613–632, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-613-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-613-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The Singapore government commissioned a modelling study of regional projections of changes in (i) long-term mean sea level and (ii) the frequency of extreme storm surge and wave events. We find that changes to long-term mean sea level constitute the dominant signal of change to the projected inundation risk for Singapore during the 21st century, these being 0.52 m(0.74 m) under the RCP 4.5(8.5) scenario.
J. R. Siddorn, S. A. Good, C. M. Harris, H. W. Lewis, J. Maksymczuk, M. J. Martin, and A. Saulter
Ocean Sci., 12, 217–231, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-217-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-217-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The Met Office provides a range of services in the marine environment. To support these services, and to ensure they evolve to meet the demands of users and are based on the best available science, a number of scientific challenges need to be addressed. The paper summarises the key challenges, and highlights some priorities for the ocean monitoring and forecasting research group at the Met Office.
Joanne Williams, C. W. Hughes, M. E. Tamisiea, and S. D. P. Williams
Ocean Sci., 10, 701–718, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-701-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-701-2014, 2014
C. W. Hughes, Joanne Williams, A. C. Coward, and B. A. de Cuevas
Ocean Sci., 10, 215–225, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-215-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-215-2014, 2014
Joanne Williams and Chris W. Hughes
Ocean Sci., 9, 111–119, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-111-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-111-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Approach: Numerical Models | Depth range: All Depths | Geographical range: All Geographic Regions | Phenomena: Tides
A practical scheme to introduce explicit tidal forcing into an OGCM
K. Sakamoto, H. Tsujino, H. Nakano, M. Hirabara, and G. Yamanaka
Ocean Sci., 9, 1089–1108, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-1089-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-1089-2013, 2013
Cited articles
Arbic, B. K.: Atmospheric forcing of the oceanic semidiurnal tide, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 32, L02610, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021668, 2005. a
BSH: The operational model system at BSH,
available at: http://www.bsh.de/en/Marine_data/Forecasts/Prediction_models/index.jsp,
last access: 18 May 2018. a
Byrne, D., Robbins, G., Counsell, N., How, A., Saulter, A., O'Neill, C., and
Pope, J.: Improving Sea Level Forecasting at Newport, Internal report,
2017. a
Chen, G., Qian, C., and Zhang, C.: New Insights into Annual and Semiannual
Cycles of Sea Level Pressure, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 1347–1355,
https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00187.1, 2012. a
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi,
S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P.,
Beljaars, A. C. M., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C.,
Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B.,
Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M.,
Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park,
B.-K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and Vitart,
F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data
assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
137, 553–597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011. a
Dobslaw, H. and Thomas, M.: Atmospheric induced oceanic tides from ECMWF
forecasts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, l10615, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022990, 2005. a, b, c
Flowerdew, J., Horsburgh, K., Wilson, C., and Mylne, K.: Development and
evaluation of an ensemble forecasting system for coastal storm surges,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 136, 1444–1456,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.648, 2010. a, b, c
Flowerdew, J., Mylne, K., Jones, C., and Titley, H.: Extending the forecast
range of the UK storm surge ensemble, Q. J. Roy.
Meteor. Soc., 139, 184–197, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1950, 2013. a
Haigh, I. D., Wadey, M. P., Gallop, S. L., Loehr, H., Nicholls, R. J.,
Horsburgh, K., Brown, J. M., and Bradshaw, E.: A user-friendly database of
coastal flooding in the United Kingdom from 1915–2014, Scientific Data, 2,
150021, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.21, 2015. a
Hibbert, A., Royston, S. J., Horsburgh, K. J., Leach, H., and Hisscott, A.: An
empirical approach to improving tidal predictions using recent real-time tide
gauge data, J. Oper. Oceanogr., 8, 40–51,
https://doi.org/10.1080/1755876X.2015.1014641, 2015. a
IHO: Regulations for International (INT) Charts and Chart Specifications of the
IHO, International Hydrographic Organization,
available at:
https://www.iho.int/iho_pubs/standard/S-4/S-4 Ed 4.7.0 July 2017 EN.pdf
(last access: September 2018), 2017. a
National Weather Service: Extra-tropical storm surge 2.2,
available at: http://slosh.nws.noaa.gov/etsurge, last access: 14 March
2018. a
O'Neill, C. and Saulter, A.: NEMO-Surge: Forecast performance during
2016–2017 winter trial, Tech. Rep. 622, Met Office, 2017. a
Proudman, J.: The propagation of tide and surge in an estuary, P. Roy. Soc. A-Math. Phy., 231, 8–24, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1955.0153,
1955. a
Ray, R. D. and Egbert, G. D.: The Global S1 Tide, J. Phys.
Oceanogr., 34, 1922–1935,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2004)034<1922:TGST>2.0.CO;2, 2004. a, b
Schindelegger, M. and Dobslaw, H.: A global ground truth view of the lunar air
pressure tide L2, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 95–110,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024243, 2016. a
Taylor, A. and Brassington, G. B.: Sea Level Forecasts Aggregated from
Established Operational Systems, J. Mar. Sci. Eng.,
5, 33, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse5030033, 2017. a
Verlaan, M., De Kleermaeker, S., and Buckman, L. GLOSSIS: Global storm surge
forecasting and information system, in: Australasian Coasts & Ports
Conference 2015: 22nd Australasian Coastal and Ocean Engineering Conference
and the 15th Australasian Port and Harbour Conference, Auckland, New Zealand:
Engineers Australia and IPENZ, 2015, 229–234, available at:
https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=703696922952912;res=IELENG
(last access: September 2018), 2015. a
Wessel, P. and Smith, W. H. F.: A global, self-consistent, hierarchical,
high-resolution shoreline database, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol.
Ea., 101, 8741–8743, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JB00104, 1996. a
Williams, J., Saulter, A., O'Neill, C., Brown, J., and Horsburgh, K.: A
reassessment of the UK operational surge forecasting procedure, Research &
Consultancy Report 62, National Oceanography Centre, 2018. a
Woodworth, P. L., Hunter, J. R. Marcos, M., Caldwell, P., Menendez, M., and
Haigh, I.: Towards a global higher-frequency sea level data set, Geosci. Data
J., 3, 50–59, https://doi.org/10.1002/gdj3.42, 2017.
a
Yotsukuri, M., Tamura, M.,
Kumano, N., Masunaga, E., and Yokoki, H.:
Global Impact Assessment of Sea Level Rise Based
on Rcp/ssp Scenarios, Global Environ. Eng.
Res., 73, I_369–I_376, https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejer.73.I_369, 2017. a
Zijl, F., Verlaan, M., and Gerritsen, H.: Improved water-level forecasting for
the Northwest European Shelf and North Sea through direct modelling of tide,
surge and non-linear interaction, Ocean Dynam., 63, 823–847,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-013-0624-2, 2013. a
Short summary
Tide predictions based on tide-gauge observations are not just astronomical tides; they also contain periodic sea level changes due to the weather. Forecasts of total water level during storm surges add the immediate effects of the weather to the astronomical tide prediction and thus risk double-counting these effects. We use a global model to see how much double-counting may affect these forecasts and also how much of the Highest Astronomical Tide may be due to recurrent weather patterns.
Tide predictions based on tide-gauge observations are not just astronomical tides; they also...