the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Controls on dense-water formation along the path of the North Atlantic subpolar gyre
Oliver J. Tooth
Helen L. Johnson
Chris Wilson
The North Atlantic subpolar gyre (SPG) plays a fundamental role in the global climate system through the formation of dense North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) as part of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Observations show pronounced decadal variability in SPG water mass properties; however, it remains unclear to what extent such thermohaline changes impact the formation of dense water. Here, we explore the mechanisms governing dense-water formation along the path of the SPG using Lagrangian water parcel trajectories in an eddy-rich ocean sea ice hindcast. We show that neither the rate of transformation of water parcels across density surfaces nor their thermohaline properties on arrival into the eastern SPG are rate-limiting factors governing dense-water formation. Instead, the total amount of dense water formed during transit around the SPG can be skilfully predicted based solely on the volume transport of light, upper-limb waters arriving into the eastern SPG via the branches of the North Atlantic Current. This relationship between upper-limb volume transport and dense-water formation emerges since the SPG boundary current is long enough for all upper-limb thermal anomalies to be damped during transit. Our findings emphasise the close relationship between the strength of the SPG and subpolar dense-water formation on multi-decadal timescales, such that a stronger SPG circulation following persistent positive phases of the North Atlantic Oscillation results in greater NADW formation along-stream. This underscores the importance of monitoring the state of the SPG for both decadal and longer-term climate predictions.
- Article
(10200 KB) - Full-text XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Observations and ocean reanalyses indicate that the upper subpolar North Atlantic Ocean (SPNA) exhibits pronounced thermohaline variability on decadal timescales (Curry et al., 1998; Bersch, 2002; Bersch et al., 2007; Lozier and Stewart, 2008; Holliday et al., 2018, 2020; Fu et al., 2020), with significant implications for both regional and global climate (e.g. Zhang et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2020). On a regional scale, the northward propagation of upper-ocean thermohaline anomalies from the SPNA into the Nordic Seas yields predictable climate impacts on surface air temperatures over northwestern Europe (Collins and Sinha, 2003; Keenlyside et al., 2008; Li et al., 2013; Årthun et al., 2017), Arctic sea ice extent (Zhang, 2015; Yeager et al., 2015), and the rates of Greenland glacial melting (Straneo and Heimbach, 2013). The impacts of North Atlantic multi-decadal sea surface temperature (SST) variability also extend far beyond the regional scale, including through hemispheric teleconnections which contribute to changes in West African and Indian summer monsoon rainfall (Feng and Hu, 2008; Goswami et al., 2006; Luo et al., 2011; Martin and Thorncroft, 2014; Martin et al., 2014) and Pacific decadal climate variability (Zhang et al., 2007; d'Orgeville and Peltier, 2007; Zhang et al., 2019).
Both observational and numerical modelling studies have repeatedly identified low-frequency subpolar ocean dynamics as the principal source of high-latitude upper-ocean thermohaline variability (Årthun and Eldevik, 2016; Desbruyères et al., 2015; Grist et al., 2010; Robson et al., 2016; Yeager and Robson, 2017; Chafik et al., 2023). In particular, multi-decadal changes in the subpolar gyre (SPG) and overturning circulations (Yeager et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2024), excited by fluctuations in the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO; Hurrell, 1995; Marshall et al., 2001), have been shown to modulate the poleward heat transport by warm and saline subtropical waters into the eastern SPNA (Jacobs et al., 2019; Desbruyères et al., 2013). Two important examples are the 1990s and 2010s, when persistent positive phases of the NAO induced a delayed warming and salinification of the upper eastern SPG (Desbruyères et al., 2021; Fu et al., 2020; Chafik et al., 2023), which propagated downstream into the Nordic Seas (Fan et al., 2023; Passos et al., 2024). This potentially predictable influence of subpolar ocean dynamics on the North Atlantic climate system is further underscored by initialised decadal predictions (Marotzke et al., 2016; Smith et al., 2019; Boer et al., 2016), which show a strong sensitivity in retrospective forecast skill to the initialised subpolar ocean state (e.g. Robson et al., 2012; Msadek et al., 2014; Hermanson et al., 2014; Yeager and Robson, 2017).
To date, very few studies (e.g. Passos et al., 2024) have investigated the extent to which the arrival of such anomalies persist to impact the formation of dense-water masses downstream. On the one hand, we might expect that upper-ocean thermohaline anomalies will feed back onto the production of North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW) by impacting the efficiency of diapycnal water mass transformation. Indeed, this view forms the basis of the salt advection feedback (Stommel, 1961; Rahmstorf, 1996; de Vries and Weber, 2005), in which a weakened Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) transports less salt into the SPNA, thereby reducing NADW formation through increasing stratification, which further weakens the AMOC. However, this view is at odds with a number of recent observational studies (Fu et al., 2020; Fraser and Cunningham, 2021; Mercier et al., 2024; Koman et al., 2024), which show that the strength of subpolar overturning has remained relatively stable in spite of the large-scale thermohaline variability observed throughout the SPNA during recent decades. Fu et al. (2020) reconcile this by suggesting that only a weak coupling exists between upper-limb thermohaline anomalies and the magnitude of subpolar dense-water formation on multi-decadal timescales. However, precisely what controls the amount of dense water formed along the path of the SPG and its relationship to subpolar overturning variability on multi-decadal timescales remains poorly understood.
When exploring the downstream evolution of upper-ocean thermohaline anomalies in the SPNA, studies adopting the traditional Eulerian frame of reference typically use lagged correlation analysis (Holliday et al., 2008; Årthun and Eldevik, 2016; Årthun et al., 2017; Fan et al., 2023), which relies upon the coherent propagation of signals downstream. In reality, however, thermohaline anomalies are communicated over a diverse range of advective timescales owing to the dispersive nature of subpolar circulation pathways (e.g. Yashayaev and Seidov, 2015), which often convolve water masses from many different sources. In this study, we overcome this challenge by adopting a Lagrangian approach to investigate the controls on dense-water formation along the path of the SPG. By evaluating Lagrangian water parcel trajectories in an eddy-rich ocean sea ice hindcast, we are able to trace the evolution of upper-limb thermohaline anomalies arriving into the eastern SPNA and directly assess their influence on the formation of NADW during their transit of the SPG.
This study is organised as follows. In Sect. 2, we introduce the eddy-rich ocean sea ice hindcast, the Lagrangian particle tracking experiments, and both the Eulerian and Lagrangian diagnostics used in our analysis. Section 3.1 explores the nature of dense-water formation along the path of the SPG, including validation against Overturning in the Subpolar North Atlantic Program (OSNAP) observations. We investigate the sources of variability in along-stream dense-water formation in Sect. 3.2. In Sect. 3.3, we propose a linear model to skilfully predict along-stream dense-water formation. Section 3.4 explores the two dense-water formation pathways circulating cyclonically around the SPG. Finally, in Sect. 3.5, we assess the role of remote buoyancy forcing in driving decadal variations in dense-water formation along the path of the SPG. The study concludes with a critical discussion and summary of our main findings and their wider implications for observing subpolar AMOC variability in Sect. 4.
2.1 Ocean general circulation model
To investigate the variability of dense-water formation along the path of the subpolar gyre, we use output from the eddy-rich, global ORCA0083-GO8p7 numerical ocean model configuration (Megann et al., 2022; Archibald et al., 2025). This uses the Nucleus for European Modelling of the Ocean (NEMO) ocean circulation model version 4.0.4 (Madec et al., 2019) implemented in the UK Global Ocean (GO) version 8 configuration. This is a pre-release configuration of the Global Ocean and Sea Ice (GOSI) version 9 (Guiavarc'h et al., 2025) developed by the UK Joint Marine Modelling Programme in preparation for CMIP7.

Figure 1Time mean (2014–2020) Eulerian diapycnal overturning stream functions at (a) OSNAP East and (b) OSNAP West, calculated using the ORCA0083-GO8p7 hindcast (black) and OSNAP observations (purple). The shaded regions represent ±1 (monthly) standard deviation in the Eulerian overturning stream function. Time series of maximum Eulerian diapycnal overturning at (c) OSNAP East and (d) OSNAP West, calculated using the ORCA0083-GO8p7 hindcast (black) and OSNAP observations (purple).
The NEMO ocean model is discretised on an Arakawa C grid with a nominal ° resolution (equivalent to ∼8 km in the subtropical North Atlantic and ∼4 km in the Arctic). The extended version of the quasi-isotropic ORCA12 orthogonal tri-polar grid (eORCA12) is used, with poles located on land in Canada, Siberia, and Antarctica. In the vertical, the model uses 75 unevenly spaced z*-partial-step coordinate levels with unperturbed depth increments ranging from 1 to 250 m. The depth increment of the grid cells at each vertical level varies through time due to the implementation of a non-linear free surface (Madec et al., 2019). Within the NEMO framework, the NEMO Ocean Engine (NEMO-OCE) is coupled to the SI3 sea ice model (Vancoppenolle et al., 2023; Blockley et al., 2024). For a comprehensive description of the ORCA0083-GO8p7 model configuration, users are referred to Guiavarc'h et al. (2025).
The ORCA0083-GO8p7 integration is initialised from rest with temperature and salinity from the climatology of an Argo-based observational objective analysis (EN4; Good et al., 2013) covering 1995–2014. The model is forced by the Japanese 55-year atmospheric reanalysis (JRA55-do; Tsujino et al., 2018) for the period 1958–2021. We disregard the initial 18 years of the integration when model adjustment is largest and make use of the monthly mean velocity and tracer field output between 1975–2021.
To assess the fidelity of the subpolar ocean circulation in the ORCA0083-GO8p7 hindcast, we compare the simulated diapycnal overturning to OSNAP observations between 2014–2020. Figure 1a and b shows the time mean Eulerian diapycnal overturning stream functions at the OSNAP East and OSNAP West sections calculated using both the model and observations. Overall, we find good agreement between the modelled and observed overturning stream functions in density space at the OSNAP array. At OSNAP East, the maximum of the time mean diapycnal overturning stream function in the model (13.5±2.3 Sv at 27.51 kg m−3) is slightly weaker than observed (14.5±3.0 Sv at 27.55 kg m−3). However, this is primarily due to the weaker time mean net northward transport across the section in the model (0.8±1.1 Sv) compared to the 1.6 Sv imposed in the OSNAP observational calculation. Figure 1b shows that there is also close agreement between both the magnitude and isopycnal of maximum diapycnal overturning in the model (2.1±2.8 Sv at 27.70 kg m−3) and observations (2.2±1.8 Sv at 27.69 kg m−3) at OSNAP West. This is particularly encouraging, given that many eddy-rich models considerably overestimate the time mean strength of diapycnal overturning in the Labrador Sea (e.g. Petit et al., 2023; Markina et al., 2024). Once we account for the larger net southward flow across the OSNAP West section in the model ( Sv) compared with that imposed in the OSNAP observational calculation (−1.6 Sv), we do find that the modelled diapycnal overturning is slightly stronger than observed.
Figure 1c and d show the time series of diapycnal overturning strength at OSNAP East and OSNAP West as determined by calculating the maximum of each monthly overturning stream function. Although we find a significant correlation (r=0.55, p<0.01) between the modelled and observed diapycnal overturning strength at OSNAP East, it is clear that the model (monthly SD = 2.6 Sv) underestimates the monthly overturning variability captured in observations (monthly SD = 3.0 Sv). In contrast, at OSNAP West, we find a much weaker correlation (r=0.27, p<0.05) since the observed diapycnal overturning strength is less variable than that found in the model, especially on seasonal timescales. The stronger overturning seasonality in the model is due to the presence of warmer (+0.14 °C) and saltier (+0.1 g kg−1) waters in the western Labrador Sea compared with OSNAP observations, which experience less density compensation between wintertime cooling and year-round freshening (Zou et al., 2020; Bebieva and Lozier, 2023).
In addition to reproducing much of the observed strength of and monthly variability in overturning along the OSNAP array, we also find reasonably good agreement between the modelled (6.5±1.0 Sv) and observed (5.8±0.7 Sv; Østerhus et al., 2019) overturning strength at the Greenland–Scotland Ridge (1995–2015). Given our focus on the formation of dense water along the boundary current of the SPG in this study, we also highlight the close agreement between the time mean top-to-bottom strength of the East Greenland Current ( Sv) in the model and that observed by Daniault et al. (2016) ( Sv) between 2002–2012 along the OVIDE section. However, in the Labrador Sea, the model ( Sv) slightly underestimates the time mean (1997–2014) strength of the Deep Western Boundary Current (DWBC) at 53° N as, reported by Zantopp et al. (2017) ( Sv, where σθ≥27.68 kg m−3).
In spite of these differences, we consider the broad overall agreement between the strength of both the SPG and the diapycnal overturning circulations simulated in the ORCA0083-GO8p7 hindcast and that observed along trans-basin arrays to be sufficient justification for using this model to investigate the nature of dense-water formation along the path of the SPG.
2.2 Lagrangian particle tracking
We evaluate the Lagrangian trajectories of virtual water parcels advected by the time-evolving velocity fields of the ORCA0083-GO8p7 hindcast using TRACMASS version 7.1 (Aldama-Campino et al., 2020). TRACMASS belongs to the inaugural family of Lagrangian particle tracking tools, which allow users to quantify the volume transport pathways of a steady, incompressible flow field by modelling water parcel trajectories as individual stream tubes (e.g. Blanke and Delecluse, 1993; Döös, 1995). Here, we use the stepwise stationary scheme, which divides the duration between successive monthly mean velocity fields into 100 intermediate time steps during which volume transports are assumed to be constant. We calculate purely advective water parcel trajectories without attempting to parameterise the effects of vertical convective mixing in the surface mixed layer. This is because Tooth et al. (2023b) showed that introducing random vertical displacements along water parcel trajectories inside the surface mixed layer did not influence the strength and variability of along-stream diapycnal transformation.
To investigate the extent to which thermohaline anomalies arriving in the eastern SPG influence the formation of dense water along-stream, we evaluate the forward-in-time trajectories of water parcels sampling the full-depth northward transport across a subsection of the OSNAP East array extending from the Reykjanes Ridge (RR, 30° W) to the Scottish Shelf (SS). This approach differs from previous studies (e.g. MacGilchrist et al., 2020; Georgiou et al., 2021; Fröhle et al., 2022), which employ backward-in-time trajectories to identify the sources and export pathways of NADW flowing southward in the lower limb.
We consider only a subsection of the OSNAP array to focus our analysis on the waters which flow northward across OSNAP East in the northern, central, and southern branches of the North Atlantic Current (NAC) and to avoid sampling the recirculating upper-limb waters which return northward in the Irminger Current (see Fig. 2). One limitation resulting from this decision is that we do not quantify the contribution of upper-limb water parcels which flow directly into the Irminger Sea via the northernmost NAC branch (e.g. Daniault et al., 2016; Chafik et al., 2022) to NADW formation along the path of the SPG.

Figure 2Schematic of the North Atlantic subpolar gyre (SPG) circulation and Lagrangian experiment domain (solid black lines). Water parcels are initialised northward across the subsection of the OSNAP East array extending from the Reykjanes Ridge (∼31° W) to the Scottish Shelf (NAC, dashed black line with orange markers). The SPG pathway (orange) contains all water parcels which flow southward across the OSNAP West array between the Labrador Coast and the basin interior (53° N, solid black line) once initialised across OSNAP East and within the 9-year maximum advection period. Purple arrows represent the pathways of water parcels which are terminated on reaching the boundaries of the Lagrangian experiment domain. Water parcels remaining in the Lagrangian experiment domain are represented by the pathway terminating with an orange circle. The time mean (1975–2012) volume transports conveyed by each pathway are shown in bold.
Water parcels are initialised every month for 456 consecutive months between 1975–2012. Water parcels are assigned to each grid cell along the model-defined OSNAP East array in proportion to the northward volume transport across the grid cell face. Each water parcel represents a volume transport ≤ 2.5 mSv to ensure that a sufficiently large number of water parcels are initialised to calculate robust Lagrangian diagnostics (Jones et al., 2016).
In total, more than 12.5 million water parcels are advected forward in time using monthly mean velocity fields for a maximum of 9 years to determine their future trajectories. Water parcel trajectories are terminated on reaching the maximum advection time (τmax) or upon meeting any one of the following geographical criteria (Fig. 2): (i) crossing (southward) a subsection of the OSNAP West array (53° N), (ii) crossing the Greenland–Scotland Ridge, (iii) crossing the Davis or Hudson straits, or (iv) crossing 51° N. Figure 3a and b show that the 9-year maximum advection time is sufficient to capture the SPG circulation because the accumulated volume transports reaching OSNAP West and the Greenland–Scotland Ridge have stabilised within this period. The location, conservative temperature, and absolute salinity along each water parcel trajectory are calculated through linear interpolation using the monthly mean model tracer fields. The potential density referenced to the sea surface (σθ) is calculated along each trajectory using the TEOS-10 equation of state (McDougall et al., 2012) as implemented in the ORCA0083-GO8p7 hindcast (Megann et al., 2022).

Figure 3(a, b) Volume transport distributions of (a) SPG and (b) Nordic Sea inflow water parcels as a function of the time taken to reach either (a) OSNAP West at 53° N or (b) the Greenland–Scotland Ridge after initialisation across OSNAP East in the NAC. The solid black lines represent the accumulated volume transport as a function of water parcel transit time. (c, d) Water parcel release locations in the NAC along OSNAP East between the Reykjanes Ridge and the Scottish Shelf for the SPG pathway (c, red) and the inflows into the Nordic Seas (d, purple). The dashed black line at −18.875° E is used to distinguish between the northward volume transport arriving in the Iceland Basin and that arriving in the Rockall Trough and Plateau. The time mean volume transport distributions for each pathway are calculated by summing the absolute volume transports conveyed by water parcels in discrete longitude–depth bins, where the bin widths are Δx=0.25° E and Δz=20 m. The solid black lines show the time mean (1975–2012) position of the 27.3 kg m−3 and kg m−3 isopycnals.
2.3 Lagrangian diagnostics
To quantify the amount of dense water formed along the path of the North Atlantic SPG, we calculate the Lagrangian diapycnal overturning stream function (Tooth et al., 2023a) F(σθ,t) in density coordinates using only the subset of water parcel trajectories initialised at time t which transit from OSNAP East (NAC) to OSNAP West (53° N) within the τmax = 9-year maximum advection period (i.e. , where τout is the transit time for each water parcel). We focus on this particular subset of water parcels since the overwhelming majority of water parcels which exit via the southern boundary at 51° N or remain inside the domain following 9 years of advection are already contained within the lower limb on flowing northward across the OSNAP East section and therefore are not involved in dense-water formation. The Lagrangian diapycnal overturning stream function for each monthly ensemble of N(t) water parcels initialised across the OSNAP East section at time t is calculated following Tooth et al. (2023a, b):
where and represent the absolute volume transport distributions of SPG water parcels in density coordinates on their initial northward (NAC) and final southward (53° N) crossings of the OSNAP array.
In order to investigate the downstream evolution of thermohaline anomalies, we additionally define the volume-weighted mean of a specified quantity q (e.g. potential density) for each monthly ensemble of N(t) water parcels at some time τ following their initialisation:
where Vn is the volume transport conveyed by an individual water parcel with index n, and qn(τ) represents the value of q recorded along its trajectory at time τ following initialisation, where .
2.4 Eulerian diagnostics
2.4.1 Surface-forced water mass transformation
A major advantage of quantifying the strength of subpolar overturning in terms of density rather than traditional depth coordinates is that it can be directly related to surface buoyancy fluxes and diapycnal mixing through the water mass transformation framework (Walin, 1982; Marsh, 2000; Speer and Tziperman, 1992; Evans et al., 2023). To quantify the amount of dense water formed by surface buoyancy loss over our Lagrangian experiment domain, we first compute the surface density flux due to the fluxes of heat (QH, W m−2) and freshwater (QFW, kg m−2 s−1) at the sea surface following Speer and Tziperman (1992):
where α is the thermal expansion coefficient, β is the haline contraction coefficient, Cp is the specific heat capacity of seawater, and S is the sea surface salinity. To calculate the surface-forced diapycnal water mass transformation H(σ2,t) across an outcropping isopycnal surface, we then integrate the surface density flux over the area of each surface density outcrop :
where
We use the potential density referenced to 2000 m, σ2 in our Eulerian water mass transformation analysis to better identify Labrador Sea Water formation in this model, motivated by previous studies (e.g. Yashayaev, 2007; Yashayaev et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2018; Yeager et al., 2021). We compute the potential density σ2 at the sea surface using model monthly mean sea surface temperature and salinity fields. The density bin size is given by Δσ2= 0.02 kg m−3 following Yeager et al. (2021).
2.4.2 Definition of Labrador Sea Water
We define Labrador Sea Water (LSW) from the long-term average surface-forced diapycnal water mass transformation calculated over our Lagrangian experiment domain following the methodology of Yeager et al. (2021). The potential density range of LSW at OSNAP West is determined as the interval over which a positive annual mean formation of LSW occurs in the 1975–2012 climatology of H(σ2,t) over the region north of OSNAP West in our Lagrangian experiment domain. In this study, LSW is defined by the density range σ2=37.01–37.11 kg m−3. To account for the lighter composition of LSW in the eastern SPG, we use a modified potential density range σ2=36.95–37.11 kg m−3 to define LSW in the Irminger Sea. We quantify the interior LSW thickness ΔzLSW in the Labrador and Irminger seas by calculating the average layer thickness of LSW defined by the potential density ranges along both OSNAP West and OSNAP East where the ocean depth exceeds 2000 m.
3.1 Characterising dense-water formation along the path of the subpolar gyre
To characterise the nature of dense-water formation along the path of the SPG, we begin by describing the circulation pathways of water parcels flowing northward into the eastern SPG between 1975–2012 (Fig. 2).
On average, 52.7±9.0 Sv flows northward across the OSNAP East array between the Reykjanes Ridge and the Scottish Shelf via the branches of the NAC. Of this total northward transport, 24.8±4.2 Sv (47.0±3.1 %; Fig. 2) circulates around the SPG before flowing southward across the OSNAP West array at 53° N (between the Labrador coast and basin interior), which we shall herein refer to as the SPG pathway. The remaining northward transport across OSNAP East is distributed between pathways crossing the Greenland–Scotland Ridge (27.0±4.5 %) and the Davis and Hudson straits (0.5±0.4 %) and 51° N (12.4±4.2 %), with a small fraction remaining within the SPG interior following 9 years of advection (11.4±2.0 %).
Figure 3d shows that the 14.5±2.3 Sv flowing northward into the Nordic Seas is dominated by relatively light (σθ≤27.3 kg m−3) water parcels, sourced almost equally from the upper 500 m of the central and southern NAC branches, which typically reach the Greenland–Scotland Ridge in less than a year. Interestingly, although this inflow is larger than the observed Atlantic inflow into the Nordic Seas (Chafik and Rossby, 2019; Østerhus et al., 2019), we find reasonable agreement between the modelled (6.5±1.0 Sv) and observed (5.8±0.7 Sv; Østerhus et al., 2019) Eulerian diapycnal overturning strength at the Greenland–Scotland Ridge (1995–2015), suggesting that a substantial fraction of northward transport across the ridge is recirculated within the upper limb in the model.
As a typical water parcel flows cyclonically around the SPG, it forms dense NADW by cooling ( °C) and freshening ( g kg−1) along-stream (Fig. 4). Figure 4b shows that, on average, the total light-to-dense transformation of SPG water parcels peaks across the σθ=27.66 kg m−3 isopycnal, which we herein refer to as . We hence define the along-stream dense-water formation (DWF) as the total volume flux of water parcels across this constant isopycnal between their initial release along OSNAP East and their final southward crossing of OSNAP West (i.e. DWF). Notably, agrees closely with the isopycnal of maximum overturning recorded in OSNAP observations ( kg m−3 during 2014–2020 in Fu et al., 2023a), although we acknowledge that this lies outside of our study period. We herein refer to water parcels with a potential density less than or greater than as being found in, respectively, the upper or lower limb of the AMOC. Furthermore, we refer to lower-limb water parcels collectively as NADW throughout the study since constitutes the time mean upper isopycnal limit of NADW.

Figure 4Water mass transformation along the path of the North Atlantic SPG. (a) Example evolution of potential density along the SPG pathway for the subset of water parcels which form NADW after flowing northward across OSNAP East in January 1995. The potential density sampled along each trajectory transiting from the NAC inflows across OSNAP East to 53° N along OSNAP West is binned in discrete latitude–longitude space (Δx, Δy=0.1°) before calculating the average in each bin. The white contour superimposed shows the location of the 27.66 kg m−3 isopycnal used to define the AMOC upper and lower limbs. The potential density values south of OSNAP East are due to water parcels recirculating south of the array en route to 53° N. (b) Time mean (1975–2012) Lagrangian overturning stream functions in density coordinates for the SPG pathway. The total diapycnal overturning along the full path of the SPG (black) is decomposed into the contributions of water mass transformation in the eastern (orange) and western SPG (blue). The dashed black line indicates the isopycnal of the maximum of the time mean Lagrangian overturning stream function denoted as . (c, d) Time mean (1975–2012) volume transport distributions of water parcels along the path of the SPG in conservative temperature and absolute salinity coordinates. The three distributions shown in each panel correspond to the water parcel properties at their initial location along OSNAP East (NAC, red), their subsequent northward crossing of OSNAP West (WGC, orange), and their final southward crossing of OSNAP West (53° N, blue).
Of the 24.8±4.2 Sv circulating around the SPG, Fig. 4b indicates that 12.7±1.9 Sv forms dense NADW (i.e. ) prior to crossing OSNAP West. However, 5.6±1.4 Sv of the water flowing northward across OSNAP East is already in the lower limb, and this 12.7±1.9 Sv of NADW formation represents a significant fraction of the 19.2±3.0 Sv flowing northward across OSNAP East in the upper limb.
We additionally decompose the total DWF along-stream into the separate contributions made in the eastern and western SPG by calculating partial Lagrangian overturning stream functions using the properties of water parcels during their northward crossing of the OSNAP West array via the West Greenland Current (WGC; Fig. 4a). In agreement with OSNAP observations (Lozier et al., 2019; Li et al., 2021), we find that the time mean DWFSPG is dominated by NADW formation in the eastern SPG (9.0±1.7 Sv; Fig. 4b). In contrast, DWF is much weaker in the Labrador Sea (3.7±0.9 Sv) since there is greater density compensation between cooling and freshening along-stream (Fig. 4c and d). The mean strength of along-stream DWF in the Labrador Sea agrees well with the magnitude of diapycnal overturning observed along OSNAP West (3.0±1.5 Sv during 2014–2020 in Fu et al., 2023a). An equivalent comparison of DWF with observations in the eastern SPG is impeded by the contribution of the Nordic Sea overflows in the Eulerian diapycnal overturning stream function calculated at OSNAP East. However, we note that our finding that the eastern SPG accounts for 9.0±1.7 Sv of the total along-stream DWF agrees closely with both the results presented in Tooth et al. (2023a) and previous estimates from observations and ocean reanalyses, which suggest that between 9–10 Sv of diapycnal transformation takes place in the Iceland and Irminger basins (e.g. Sarafanov et al., 2012; Chafik and Rossby, 2019; Koman et al., 2022; Buckley et al., 2023; Fu et al., 2024).
3.2 What governs dense-water formation along the path of the subpolar gyre?
Figure 5a shows that the amount of dense NADW formed along the path of the SPG varies substantially across seasonal to decadal timescales. We next explore whether the initial properties of an upper-limb water parcel on release across OSNAP East have any influence on the likelihood of forming dense NADW downstream.

Figure 5Controls on dense-water formation along the path of the North Atlantic SPG. (a) Dense-water formation (i.e. total volume flux of water parcels across ) along the path of the SPG (NAC to 53° N) plotted according to the common inflow time when water parcels flow northward across OSNAP East. The bold line is obtained by applying a 12-month running-mean filter to the monthly dense-water formation (light-grey line) coloured by the volume-weighted mean potential density of the SPG upper-limb (i.e. ) water parcels. (b) Monthly dense-water formation plotted against the volume-weighted mean potential density of SPG upper-limb water parcels coloured by their month of release across OSNAP East in the NAC. (c) Monthly dense-water formation plotted against the total volume transport of SPG upper-limb water parcels coloured by their volume-weighted mean potential density on release across OSNAP East.
Consistently with Tooth et al. (2023b), we find that variability in the composition of the upper limb at OSNAP East is dominated by seasonality (Fig. 5b); upper-limb water parcels are, on average, lighter when crossing OSNAP East northward during autumn and denser when crossing during spring. However, Fig. 5b shows that DWFSPG is not significantly correlated (p>0.05) with the volume-weighted average potential density (or with the conservative temperature or absolute salinity) of water parcels flowing northward across OSNAP East in the upper limb. Furthermore, we find no statistically significant relationship between annual means of DWFSPG and upper-limb potential density (buoyancy), suggesting that along-stream DWF is not influenced by the arrival of upper-limb buoyancy anomalies into the eastern SPG on either seasonal or interannual timescales. In contrast, we find a strong positive correlation (r=0.86, p<0.01) between DWFSPG and the total northward upper-limb transport flowing cyclonically from OSNAP East to OSNAP West (53° N), such that a larger volume transport of upper-limb waters into the eastern SPG results in greater NADW formation along-stream (Fig. 5c).
There are several important reasons why this enhanced DWF along the path of the SPG may not necessarily project onto Eulerian diapycnal overturning variability diagnosed along the full OSNAP array. Firstly, as we shall later see in Sect. 3.4, the formation of dense water occurs at many different locations around the SPG, meaning that there is a wide range of transit times for newly formed NADW to reach 53° N (Fig. 3a). Second, when calculating the Eulerian overturning along the full OSNAP array, the properties and volume fluxes of water parcels whose histories include dense-water formation in the Nordic Seas and the Arctic Ocean are convolved with those transformed within SPG. The thermohaline properties of water parcels enter this Eulerian overturning calculation because it involves integration within density classes.
To better understand the relationship between upper-limb volume transport and along-stream diapycnal transformation, we can express the total DWF along the path of the SPG as follows:
where VSPG[UL](t) represents the SPG upper-limb volume transport arriving at OSNAP East, and κ(t) represents the fraction of this upper-limb volume transport that will form NADW prior to reaching OSNAP West. We recall that the time t refers to the shared time when water parcels flow northward across OSNAP East and not the time at which they subsequently form NADW downstream. Furthermore, by decomposing each term into its steady and fluctuating components (i.e. and ), we can clearly see that variations in DWFSPG are potentially due to a complex combination of changes in the amount of upper-limb water flowing northward across OSNAP East () and changes in the efficiency with which water parcels are transferred from the upper to the lower limb along-stream( κ′(t)):
Surprisingly, Fig. 5c suggests that the efficiency of along-stream diapycnal transformation κ′(t) is not the rate-limiting factor governing DWF along the path of the SPG. Instead, variations in DWFSPG are proportional to the amount of upper-limb water imported into the eastern SPG via the branches of the NAC (i.e. DWF). This implies that along-stream diapycnal transformation is sufficient to transfer a steady fraction of upper-limb water parcels into the lower limb, irrespective of their initial thermohaline properties on their northward crossing of OSNAP East. Furthermore, the SPG upper-limb volume transport is also strongly correlated with the total volume transport along the path of the SPG (r=0.97, p<0.01), indicating that DWFSPG is closely related to the overall strength of the SPG circulation.
3.3 How predictable is subpolar gyre dense-water formation?
Since we have shown that DWF along the path of the SPG is proportional to the upper-limb volume transport imported into the eastern SPNA, next, we develop a simple linear model to predict the amount of dense NADW formed along-stream. By assuming that the efficiency of water mass transformation from the upper to the lower limb is time-independent (i.e. ), we can formulate a linear model for DWFSPG as follows:
where is the constant fraction of the upper-limb volume transport which forms NADW along-stream, and ϵ(t) represents the residual error, which is given by
We find that , implying that, on average, 66 % of upper-limb waters flowing northward across OSNAP East are transferred into the lower limb prior to their southward crossing of OSNAP West (53° N). Figure 6a shows the strong predictive skill of the linear model on both monthly (RMSE = 1.1 Sv) and interannual (RMSE = 0.8 Sv) timescales, accounting for 74% and 68% of the variance in monthly and interannual (12-month running-mean filtered) DWF, respectively.

Figure 6A linear model for dense-water formation (DWF) along the path of the North Atlantic SPG. (a) Monthly DWF along the path of the SPG (NAC to 53° N, black) and estimated DWF using a simple linear model (pink). (b) The residual DWF ϵ(t) which is not included in the simple linear model is decomposed into the contributions made by the fluctuations in the efficiency of diapycnal transformation from the upper to the lower limb acting on the time mean transport of the upper limb and a non-linear term representing the correlation between fluctuations in the efficiency of diapycnal transformation and in the upper-limb volume transport. The bold lines are obtained by applying a 12-month running-mean filter to the monthly values.
To better understand the sources of error in our linear model, we decompose the residual DWF ϵ(t) into its two components in Fig. 6b. We find that the residual DWF is almost exclusively explained by fluctuations in the efficiency of along-stream diapycnal transformation from the upper to the lower limb acting on the time mean volume transport of the SPG upper limb (). More specifically, the linear model overestimates the amount of dense NADW formed during the late 1970s and mid-1980s, indicating that the time-independent efficiency of diapycnal transformation of the linear model is too large during these periods (i.e. ). In contrast, during the early and late 2000s, the efficiency of transformation is slightly underestimated (i.e. ), resulting in an underestimation of the DWF downstream. Despite these differences, the high predictive skill of the linear model, especially on interannual to decadal timescales, suggests that changes in diapycnal transformation efficiency play a secondary role in governing variations in DWF when compared to variability in the upper-limb transport imported into the eastern SPG.
Given that % of the upper-limb waters arriving across OSNAP form dense NADW along the path of the SPG, we next consider what happens to the remaining % of upper-limb waters which do not form dense NADW before crossing OSNAP West at 53° N. Of the 6.4±1.7 Sv of upper-limb water which does not form dense NADW along the path of the SPG, we find that 1.5±0.5 Sv becomes lighter through entrainment into the fresh Labrador Coastal Current. Meanwhile, the majority of outstanding upper-limb transport (5.0±1.4 Sv) becomes denser but not dense enough to be transferred into the lower limb on crossing OSNAP West via the Labrador Current. To determine the fate of these denser water parcels remaining in the upper limb at 53° N, we extend our original Lagrangian experiment by continuing to track upper-limb water parcels after they cross the OSNAP West section. We find that almost all of the denser upper-limb water parcels (94 %) are either transformed into dense NADW south of the OSNAP West section or return to OSNAP East via the NAC to continue circulating around the SPG. Thus, of the total upper-limb transport imported into the eastern SPG, we would expect that, on average, almost 92.5 % will form dense NADW during one or more additional circuits of the SPG, whereas 7.5 % will join the fresh, estuarine circulation confined to the shelves of the SPNA.
3.4 Two dense-water formation pathways around the subpolar gyre
We have demonstrated that the total DWF along the path of the SPG can be skilfully predicted with knowledge of only the northward upper-limb transport, which flows cyclonically around the SPG, and a time-independent parameter , representing the efficiency of diapycnal transformation along-stream.
Figure 7 reveals that there are, in fact, two distinct pathways by which dense water is formed along the path of the SPG. By decomposing DWF into the separate contributions made by the NAC branches flowing northward in the Iceland Basin and in the Rockall Trough (Fig. 7a), we find that upper-limb water parcels sourced from the Iceland Basin (DWF) account for almost three-quarters (9.3±1.8 Sv) of the time mean DWF and 88 % of its variance on interannual timescales (Fig. 7b). This contrasts with upper-limb water parcels flowing northward in the Rockall Trough, which account for 3.4±0.7 Sv (DWF) of along-stream DWF and around 31 % of the interannual variability in DWF. These differences in along-stream DWF are partly explained by the larger northward transport entering the Iceland Basin across OSNAP East (21.2±4.0 Sv) compared with the Rockall Trough (3.9±0.8 Sv in Fig. 3c). However, this is far from the complete picture, given that these two dense-water pathways are also characterised by distinct modes of diapycnal transformation (Fig. 7c and d), resulting in markedly different efficiencies in the transformation of water parcels from the upper to the lower limb.

Figure 7Dense-water formation along the two circulation pathways of the North Atlantic SPG. (a) Time mean (1975–2012) volume transport of SPG water parcels originating from the Iceland Basin (IB, red) and the Rockall Trough (RT, purple) across OSNAP East. Water parcel volume transports are binned into discrete longitude–depth space (Δx=0.25° E, Δz=20 m) according to their initial release locations along OSNAP East. The solid black line shows the time mean (1975–2012) position of the isopycnal used to define along-stream dense-water formation and hence delimits the upper and lower limbs of the AMOC in this study. (b) Anomalies in the total DWF along the path of the SPG (DWF, black) decomposed into the contributions made by upper-limb water parcels sourced from the Iceland Basin (DWF, red) and the Rockall Trough (DWF, purple). We apply a 12-month running-mean filter to the monthly DWF anomalies in order to highlight interannual to decadal variability. (c, d) Volume-weighted mean potential density evolution of upper-limb water parcels, sourced from the IB (c) and the RT (d), which experience a net positive diapycnal transformation along-stream (Δσ>0 kg m−3). The bold lines are obtained by applying a 12-month running-mean filter to the monthly mean potential density values recorded on initialisation across OSNAP East (IB/RT) and on crossing OSNAP West via both the West Greenland Current (WGC) and the Labrador Current (53° N). Note that values are plotted according to the time when water parcels flow northward across the OSNAP East section in panels (b)–(d).
We find that 59 % (, Fig. 8) of upper-limb waters entering the Iceland Basin via the northern and central branches of the NAC form upper NADW downstream ( kg m−3). Consistently with the dominant Lagrangian overturning pathway identified in Tooth et al. (2023a), we find that upper-limb water parcels undergo progressive diapycnal transformation along-stream (Figs. 4a and 7c). In contrast, practically all (, Fig. 8) of the upper-limb waters arriving in the subsurface in the Rockall Trough form dense lower NADW ( kg m−3) by intense, localised diapycnal transformation near the exit of the Faroe-Bank Channel (Fig. 7d). This finding is consistent with previous studies (e.g. Sarafanov et al., 2012; Devana et al., 2021; Chafik and Holliday, 2022), which identify a “short-cut” pathway for subtropical-origin waters to penetrate the deep ocean on sub-decadal timescales by diapycnal mixing with overflow waters south of the Iceland–Faroe Ridge. The clear distinction between the character of dense water formed along these two pathways is evident from the two peaks in the conservative temperature distribution of SPG water parcels on their northward crossing of OSNAP West via the WGC in Fig. 4c.

Figure 8Dense-water formation and the total volume transport of SPG upper-limb water parcels sourced from the Iceland Basin (IB, red) and the Rockall Trough (RT, purple) inflows across OSNAP East. The values of overlaid represent the fraction of upper-limb waters sourced from the IB and RT, which form dense NADW before reaching 53° N at OSNAP West. We include only the SPG upper-limb water parcels experiencing a net positive diapycnal transformation (i.e. Δσ>0 kg m−3) along-stream to exclude those entrained into the fresh estuarine circulation in the Labrador Sea.
Concordant with our earlier analysis in Sect. 3.2, Fig. 7c and d show that potential density (buoyancy) anomalies conveyed by upper-limb water parcels arriving in both the Iceland Basin and the Rockall Trough are strongly damped along-stream. This increasing homogeneity of water parcel properties on reaching 53° N is particularly evident in the Iceland Basin (Fig. 7c), where we find that variations in the average potential density of upper-limb water parcels can only explain around 30 % of their downstream variability at 53∘N (i.e. , p<0.01).
3.5 What drives decadal variability in subpolar gyre dense-water formation?
We have seen that the amount of dense water formed along the path of the SPG exhibits substantial variations on decadal timescales (Fig. 5a), which principally result from changes in the transport of upper-limb water arriving across OSNAP East via the branches of the NAC. More specifically, we find that DWFSPG transitions from a relatively strong period between 1975–1987 (13.7±2.0 Sv) to a weaker, less variable period extending from 2000 to 2012 (12.1±1.5 Sv; see Fig. 7b). Since the amount of upper-limb water flowing northward in the NAC is also strongly correlated with the total volume transport circulating around the SPG, next, we investigate the mechanisms responsible for generating variability in the strength of the SPG and, hence, DWF on decadal to multi-decadal timescales.
Previous numerical modelling studies have highlighted the important role of localised surface buoyancy forcing, driven by low-frequency changes in the NAO, in modulating decadal variability in the subpolar ocean circulation (Jackson et al., 2022; Yeager and Danabasoglu, 2014; Yeager et al., 2015; Yeager, 2020; Böning et al., 2006; Robson et al., 2012; Delworth and Zeng, 2016; Kim et al., 2018; Khatri et al., 2022). Consistently with the mechanisms proposed in these studies, we find that the generation of subsurface density anomalies and the densification of the AMOC lower limb are both important precursors to sustained positive anomalies in DWF along the path of the SPG. In particular, Fig. 9a and b show that persistent positive phases of the NAO during the mid-1980s and early 1990s were responsible for enhanced surface heat loss and, therefore, an intensification in deep convection in the SPG interior. This resulted in anomalously strong surface-forced water mass transformation in the LSW density range (i.e. σ2>37.0 kg m−3 in Fig. 9b), which increased the thickness of the LSW layer in the central Labrador and western Irminger seas (Fig. 9c). The densification of the SPG interior also manifests at the surface through a depression in the sea surface height (SSH) field (see Fig. 9d), which induces a delayed spin-up of the SPG circulation by steepening the SSH gradient across the basin (Eden and Willebrand, 2001; Yeager, 2020; Kostov et al., 2023). In agreement with recent studies (Chafik et al., 2022; Roussenov et al., 2022; Mercier et al., 2024), we find that SSH (density) anomalies in the Irminger Sea interior play an important role in determining the northward geostrophic transport of the upper limb by modulating the pressure gradient across the NAC. Specifically, Fig. 9e shows that the stronger upper-limb transport arriving in the Iceland Basin between 1975–1987 is associated with a period of anomalously low sea surface heights in the Irminger Sea interior, whereas elevated sea surface heights are concomitant with the weaker upper-limb transport recorded during 2000–2012 (Fig. 9d).

Figure 9Mechanisms governing decadal variability in dense-water formation along the path of the North Atlantic SPG. (a) Winter (DJFM) station-based North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index. (b) Winter (DJFM) surface-forced water mass transformation (WMT) anomalies relative to the 1975–2012 winter climatology calculated over the Lagrangian experiment domain (see Fig. 1a) in σ2 potential density coordinates (referenced to 2000 m). (c) Layer thickness anomalies of Labrador Sea Water (ΔzLSW) in the basin interior (where bathymetry exceeds 2000 m) along the OSNAP West (blue) and OSNAP East (orange) arrays. (d) Basin interior (where bathymetry exceeds 2000 m) sea surface height (SSH) anomaly relative to the section-wide mean SSH along the OSNAP West (blue) and OSNAP East (orange) arrays. (e) Variations in the total volume transport of SPG upper-limb water parcels (VSPG[UL], black) decomposed into contributions from water parcels sourced from the Iceland Basin (VIB[UL], red) and the Rockall Trough (VRT[UL], purple). (f) Dense-water formation along the path of the SPG (black) and the volume-weighted mean transit time of upper-limb water parcels circulating around the SPG (teal). Note that values in panels (e) and (f) are plotted according to the time when water parcels flow northward across the OSNAP East section. All anomalies are determined by removing the long-term time mean (1975–2012) from monthly values before applying a 36-month running-mean filter.
To further demonstrate that multi-decadal variations in the upper-limb transport entering the Iceland Basin are concordant with low-frequency changes in SPG dynamics, Fig. 9f shows the average transit times taken for upper-limb water parcels to circulate around the SPG. We can clearly see that the greater upper-limb volume transport across OSNAP East during 1975–1987 coincides with a faster SPG circulation. Meanwhile, during 2000–2012, the slower SPG circulation is responsible for the weaker upper-limb transport arriving in the NAC. Finally, since we have already shown that DWF along the path of the SPG depends linearly on the upper-limb transport flowing northward across OSNAP East, Fig. 9f shows that multi-decadal changes in SPG DWF are largely determined by the response of the gyre circulation to remote (i.e. Labrador Sea) surface buoyancy forcing. The strong interannual variability superimposed on this multi-decadal variability in DWF likely reflects the faster wind-driven response of the SPG circulation to changes in the NAO (e.g. Eden and Willebrand, 2001; Khatri et al., 2022). For example, Wang et al. (2021) show that wind-stress-curl-induced variations in the transport of the NAC branches arriving in the Iceland Basin and the Rockall Trough play an important role in driving interannual variability in the upper-limb transport across OSNAP East.
In summary, we have shown that decadal surface buoyancy forcing anomalies in the central Labrador and Irminger seas can remotely influence NADW formation taking place along the path of the SPG by modulating the strength of the SPG circulation and hence the availability of upper-limb waters in an eddy-rich ocean hindcast.
Despite substantial multi-decadal variability in the water mass properties of the subpolar North Atlantic Ocean, the extent to which large-scale thermohaline changes impact the formation of NADW in the SPG remains poorly understood. Here, we have investigated the physical mechanisms governing DWF along the boundary current of the SPG by adopting a Lagrangian perspective to determining how much dense water is formed as water parcels circulate around the SPG in an eddy-rich ocean model. Our analysis has revealed three important insights into the nature of dense-water formation along the path of the SPG: (a) the coupling between the subpolar gyre and overturning circulations, (b) the decoupling between upper-limb thermohaline anomalies and dense-water formation, and (c) the influence of remote surface buoyancy forcing on decadal subpolar dense-water formation variability.
4.1 Coupling between the subpolar gyre and overturning circulation components
In Sect. 3.3, we demonstrated that DWF along the boundary current of the SPG can be skilfully predicted using a simple linear model in which a constant fraction % of the available upper-limb volume transport is transformed into NADW during each circuit of the SPG. We have seen that one interpretation of is a measure of the efficiency of diapycnal transformation from the upper to the lower limb. However, this can also be conceptualised as a measure of the relative alignment between the gyre and diapycnal overturning circulations at subpolar latitudes. To illustrate this, we can consider the idealised case in which the SPG and overturning circulations are perfectly aligned (i.e. %), such that all of the upper-limb waters flowing northward in the NAC are transformed into lower-limb waters on returning southward in the Labrador Current. In this case, the volume transport flowing around the SPG would be equivalent to the DWF along-stream, and we could quantify the subpolar overturning by simply measuring the strength of the SPG circulation via the total volume transport advected in the branches of the NAC. However, we know from observations that the Labrador Current transports both upper- and lower-limb waters southward (see Fig. 4 in Zantopp et al., 2017), indicating that, in reality, the SPG circulation projects onto a diapycnal overturning cell (and thus the formation of NADW) with a time-evolving efficiency characterised by κ(t)<100 %.
Since dense water is also formed via progressive diapycnal transformation along the boundary current encircling the Nordic Seas (e.g. Eldevik et al., 2009; Isachsen et al., 2007; Mauritzen, 1996), it would be interesting to extend the Lagrangian methodology introduced in this study to establish if a similar linear relationship can be found between the northward transport of Atlantic Waters across the Greenland–Scotland Ridge and the along-stream formation of lower NADW (i.e. DWF). Previous studies have estimated that approximately 70 %–75 % of the Atlantic Water inflow to the Nordic Seas participates in the thermohaline circulation to form dense overflow waters (Østerhus et al., 2019; Le Bras et al., 2021), suggesting that –0.75.
4.2 Decoupling between upper-limb thermohaline anomalies and subpolar dense-water formation
We have also seen that the likelihood of downstream transformation into the lower limb is strongly dependent on where upper-limb waters arrive in the eastern SPG. In particular, we showed that upper-limb waters arriving in the subsurface in the Rockall Trough are almost guaranteed ( %) to form dense lower NADW via vigorous mixing with ISOW, whereas only % of upper-limb waters arriving in the Iceland Basin will form upper NADW along-stream. In agreement with the conclusion of Fu et al. (2020), we found that the amount of dense water formed along each pathway is independent of the initial properties of water parcels arriving in the NAC on seasonal to interannual timescales, indicating that upper-limb potential density anomalies do not feed back onto the strength of DWF in this eddy-rich ocean model.
To better understand this decoupling between the strength of dense-water formation and upper-ocean properties in the SPNA, we consider the length scales on which upper-limb thermohaline anomalies evolve along their path from the Iceland Basin to the western subpolar North Atlantic. For an idealised boundary current which exchanges buoyancy with both the overlying atmosphere and the basin interior (Fig. 10a), temperature and salinity adjust exponentially along-stream toward equilibrium values (Wåhlin and Johnson, 2009). The cyclonic boundary current will therefore reach an equilibrium density provided that its length exceeds the adjustment length scales with respect to both temperature and salinity. Following Wåhlin and Johnson (2009) and assuming that the inflow into the Iceland Basin is ∼200 km wide, with a temperature relaxation coefficient of 80 W m−2 and an exchange rate between the boundary current and basin interior of M=2.0 m2 s−1, we estimate the adjustment length scales for the upper-limb waters sourced from the Iceland Basin to be approximately 2400 and 7100 km for temperature and salinity, respectively. Note that, in the case of salinity, this estimate is an upper limit because we have assumed that the along-stream addition of freshwater F is small compared with the freshwater exchanged with the basin interior. Comparing these length scales with the typical path length of upper-limb water parcel trajectories travelling from the Iceland Basin to OSNAP West at 53° N (approximately 6000 km), we expect that the boundary current is fully adjusted in terms of temperature but not in terms of salinity.

Figure 10(a) Schematic of an idealised boundary current circulating cyclonically around a subpolar basin. (b) Decomposition of the volume-weighted mean potential density anomaly of upper-limb waters flowing northward across OSNAP East in the Iceland Basin. Potential density anomalies from the time mean (, black) are decomposed into their respective diathermal (, red) and diahaline (, blue) components using a linearised equation of state for seawater. Note that the potential density anomaly (solid black line) of upper-limb waters is entirely reconstructed by the sum of diathermal () and diahaline () components (underlying dashed black line).
The temperature of water reaching 53° N is therefore virtually independent of both the volume transport and initial temperature of upper-limb waters flowing northward across OSNAP East, whereas some signature of salinity anomalies arriving in the Iceland Basin may persist. Figure 10b shows that upper-limb potential density anomalies arriving in the Iceland Basin are dominated by temperature rather than salinity fluctuations on monthly to decadal timescales (i.e. , p<0.01). This dominance of thermal anomalies in the upper limb, combined with their efficient damping by air–sea fluxes and mixing during their transit of the gyre, explains both the strong decoupling between decadal changes in upper-ocean properties and SPG DWF (e.g. Fu et al., 2020) and the narrow potential density range of upper NADW in observations (27.68–27.74 kg m−3; Rhein et al., 2011; Kieke et al., 2007). On longer, centennial timescales, it is possible that the persistence of salinity anomalies will become the dominant control on NADW formation (via the salt advection feedback) as highlighted in previous coupled climate modelling studies (e.g. Delworth and Zeng, 2012; Menary et al., 2012).
The use of monthly mean model velocity and tracer fields to evaluate Lagrangian water parcel trajectories is an important limitation of this study, albeit one that is necessary to make our calculations tractable. This is because we are likely to underestimate the dispersive nature of Lagrangian trajectories and, hence, the volume exchanges between the boundary current and the interior of the Labrador and Irminger seas (Georgiou et al., 2020, 2021). By using daily or 5 d mean velocity and tracer fields, we would expect shorter circulation times (Blanke et al., 2012) and greater boundary–interior exchanges along the path of the SPG (Roach and Speer, 2019). However, the effects of eddy exchange between the boundary current and the basin interior are implicitly captured in the tracer fields, sampled along water parcel trajectories (Chenillat et al., 2015), and are therefore included in our estimates of along-stream DWF.
4.3 Influence of remote surface buoyancy forcing on decadal NADW formation variability
A further implication of the strong decoupling between the properties of upper-limb waters arriving in the eastern SPG and the strength of NADW formation is that potential density anomalies advected along the path of the SPG do not play an active role in driving subpolar overturning variability on seasonal to decadal timescales since they are unable to persist downstream. This supports the conclusion of Buckley et al. (2012) that, although decadal AMOC variability can generate upper-ocean thermohaline anomalies, these anomalies are not responsible for generating decadal subpolar overturning variability themselves. Instead, decadal variations in the DWF along the path of the SPG are driven remotely by surface buoyancy forcing localised in the central Labrador and Irminger seas in this model.
Concordant with recent studies (e.g. Roussenov et al., 2022; Kostov et al., 2023, 2024), we find that enhanced surface buoyancy loss during persistent positive phases of the NAO drives a geostrophic increase in the northward upper-limb transport into the Iceland Basin, which is consistent with an intensification of the cyclonic SPG circulation in response to the densification of the Irminger Sea interior. Since along-stream DWF is proportional to the amount of upper-limb water flowing northward across OSNAP East, we might anticipate that this spin-up of the SPG circulation would directly translate into an increase in the strength of the basin-scale diapycnal overturning circulation. However, in order for DWF to imprint onto the Eulerian overturning at lower latitudes, lower-limb waters must also be exported out of the SPG and into the subtropical North Atlantic (Buckley et al., 2023; Zou and Lozier, 2016). By comparing the long-term mean subpolar AMOC strength (∼16 Sv) to the typical southward transport of NADW at 53° N (∼30 Sv; Fröhle et al., 2022; Zantopp et al., 2017), Buckley et al. (2023) estimate that only around half of all NADW is exported to the subtropics, whilst the remainder recirculates in the SPG. Although it is beyond the scope of this study, it would be interesting to investigate whether decadal changes in DWF can influence the rate at which NADW is exported to the subtropical North Atlantic and, hence, act to modulate the advective propagation of overturning anomalies downstream.
We also recognise that model biases may play a role in amplifying the relationship between remote surface buoyancy forcing and DWF along the path of the SPG in this ocean model. For example, the larger-than-observed lower NADW formation (>27.75 kg m−3 in Fig. 1b) north of OSNAP West in this hindcast is indicative of excessive Labrador Sea deep convection (a well-established bias in eddy-rich models; Petit et al., 2023; Jackson and Petit, 2023), which would enable the deeper penetration and greater persistence of density anomalies originating from surface buoyancy forcing (Reintges et al., 2024).
In this study, we have identified the controls on the formation of NADW along the boundary current of the SPG by tracing the evolution of upper-limb waters from their arrival in the eastern SPNA to their southward return along the western boundary of the Labrador Sea. We have shown that neither the efficiency of along-stream diapycnal transformation nor the arrival of thermohaline anomalies in the NAC is the rate-limiting factor governing DWF. Instead, the amount of dense water formed along-stream can be skilfully predicted based solely on the volume transport of upper-limb waters circulating cyclonically around the SPG, which is modulated by remote surface buoyancy forcing in the interior Labrador and Irminger seas on decadal timescales. This central finding suggests that low-frequency changes in subpolar overturning must also manifest in the SPG circulation, thereby underscoring the importance of monitoring the state of the SPG for both decadal and longer-term climate predictions, as previously highlighted by Bingham et al. (2007) and Buckley et al. (2012).
More broadly, our findings imply that the projected decline in the AMOC over the 21st century will be closely related to the evolution of the SPG circulation and its representation in coupled climate models (Hirschi et al., 2020). On the one hand, the robust weakening and contraction of the SPG circulation in response to external anthropogenic forcing in coupled climate models (Sgubin et al., 2017; Swingedouw et al., 2021, 2020; Born and Stocker, 2014) are entirely consistent with a decline in along-stream NADW formation. However, this is undermined by the substantial biases exhibited by current-generation coupled climate models, which favour NADW formation through excessive deep convection in the basin interior (Heuzé, 2017, 2021) rather than via continuous diapycnal transformation along the boundary current of the SPG (Hirschi et al., 2020). Moving forward, diagnosing precursor quantities of low-frequency subpolar dense-water formation, such as Labrador Sea subsurface density (Ortega et al., 2017, 2021) or SPG transport indices (Curry and McCartney, 2001; Koul et al., 2020), may prove to be an effective means of quantifying future AMOC weakening alongside monitoring the state of the circulation itself.
Monthly mean outputs from the ORCA0083-GO8p7 ocean sea ice hindcast (Megann et al., 2022) are available from https://doi.org/10.5285/399B0F762A004657A411A9EA7203493A. Overturning in the Subpolar North Atlantic Program (OSNAP) data were collected and made freely available at https://doi.org/10.35090/gatech/70342 (Fu et al., 2023b) by the OSNAP project and all the national programmes that contribute to it (https://www.o-snap.org/ (last access: 8 July 2025). The Lagrangian trajectory code TRACMASS was originally developed by Aldama-Campino et al. (2020) (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4337926) and adapted for this study by Tooth et al. (2025a) (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17105628). The Lagrangian trajectory crossings of the OSNAP arrays can be obtained from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14870254 (Tooth, 2025b). The analysis of Lagrangian trajectories was performed using the Lagrangian Trajectories Toolbox, an open-source Python library developed by Tooth (2025c) (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15838857)
OJT, HLJ, and CW conceptualised the study. OJT designed and performed the Lagrangian experiments and developed the Lagrangian Trajectories Toolbox analysis software. OJT prepared the original paper draft. OJT, HLJ, and CW contributed to the interpretation of results and reviewed and edited the paper.
The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.
We would like to thank Alex Megann for performing the ORCA0083-GO8p7 simulation as part of the North Atlantic Climate System Integrated Study (ACSIS) programme. We are also grateful to Laura Jackson, who kindly provided the original code to extract the coordinates of OSNAP arrays from the NEMO model grid.
Oliver J. Tooth received financial support from the UK Natural Environment Research Council (grant no. NE/S007474/1) and the Atlantic Climate and Environment Strategic Science (AtlantiS) grant (no. NE/Y005589/1). Helen L. Johnson was supported by the NERC-NSF SNAP-DRAGON project (grant no. NE/T013494/1). Chris Wilson was supported by the CANARI project (grant no. NE/W004984/1).
This paper was edited by Erik van Sebille and reviewed by two anonymous referees.
Aldama-Campino, A., Döös, K., Kjellsson, J., and Jönsson, B.: TRACMASS: Formal Release of Version 7.0, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4337926, 2020. a, b
Archibald, A. T., Sinha, B., Russo, M. R., Matthews, E., Squires, F. A., Abraham, N. L., Bauguitte, S. J.-B., Bannan, T. J., Bell, T. G., Berry, D., Carpenter, L. J., Coe, H., Coward, A., Edwards, P., Feltham, D., Heard, D., Hopkins, J., Keeble, J., Kent, E. C., King, B. A., Lawrence, I. R., Lee, J., Macintosh, C. R., Megann, A., Moat, B. I., Read, K., Reed, C., Roberts, M. J., Schiemann, R., Schroeder, D., Smyth, T. J., Temple, L., Thamban, N., Whalley, L., Williams, S., Wu, H., and Yang, M.: Data Supporting the North Atlantic Climate System Integrated Study (ACSIS) Programme, Including Atmospheric Composition; Oceanographic and Sea-Ice Observations (2016–2022); and Output from Ocean, Atmosphere, Land, and Sea-Ice Models (1950–2050), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 135–164, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-135-2025, 2025. a
Årthun, M. and Eldevik, T.: On Anomalous Ocean Heat Transport toward the Arctic and Associated Climate Predictability, J. Climate, 29, 689–704, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0448.1, 2016. a, b
Årthun, M., Eldevik, T., Viste, E., Drange, H., Furevik, T., Johnson, H. L., and Keenlyside, N. S.: Skillful Prediction of Northern Climate Provided by the Ocean, Nat. Commun., 8, 15875, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15875, 2017. a, b
Bebieva, Y. and Lozier, M. S.: Fresh Water and Atmospheric Cooling Control on Density-Compensated Overturning in the Labrador Sea, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 53, 2575–2589, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-22-0238.1, 2023. a
Bersch, M.: North Atlantic Oscillation–Induced Changes of the Upper Layer Circulation in the Northern North Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 107, 3156, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC000901, 2002. a
Bersch, M., Yashayaev, I., and Koltermann, K. P.: Recent Changes of the Thermohaline Circulation in the Subpolar North Atlantic, Ocean Dynam., 57, 223–235, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-007-0104-7, 2007. a
Bingham, R. J., Hughes, C. W., Roussenov, V., and Williams, R. G.: Meridional Coherence of the North Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, 2007GL031731, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031731, 2007. a
Blanke, B. and Delecluse, P.: Variability of the Tropical Atlantic Ocean Simulated by a General Circulation Model with Two Different Mixed-Layer Physics, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 23, 1363–1388, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1993)023<1363:VOTTAO>2.0.CO;2, 1993. a
Blanke, B., Bonhommeau, S., Grima, N., and Drillet, Y.: Sensitivity of Advective Transfer Times across the North Atlantic Ocean to the Temporal and Spatial Resolution of Model Velocity Data: Implication for European Eel Larval Transport, Dynam. Atmos. Oceans, 55–56, 22–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2012.04.003, 2012. a
Blockley, E., Fiedler, E., Ridley, J., Roberts, L., West, A., Copsey, D., Feltham, D., Graham, T., Livings, D., Rousset, C., Schroeder, D., and Vancoppenolle, M.: The Sea Ice Component of GC5: Coupling SI3 to HadGEM3 Using Conductive Fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 6799–6817, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-6799-2024, 2024. a
Boer, G. J., Smith, D. M., Cassou, C., Doblas-Reyes, F., Danabasoglu, G., Kirtman, B., Kushnir, Y., Kimoto, M., Meehl, G. A., Msadek, R., Mueller, W. A., Taylor, K. E., Zwiers, F., Rixen, M., Ruprich-Robert, Y., and Eade, R.: The Decadal Climate Prediction Project (DCPP) Contribution to CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3751–3777, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3751-2016, 2016. a
Böning, C. W., Scheinert, M., Dengg, J., Biastoch, A., and Funk, A.: Decadal Variability of Subpolar Gyre Transport and Its Reverberation in the North Atlantic Overturning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, 2006GL026906, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026906, 2006. a
Born, A. and Stocker, T. F.: Two Stable Equilibria of the Atlantic Subpolar Gyre, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 44, 246–264, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-13-073.1, 2014. a
Buckley, M. W., Ferreira, D., Campin, J.-M., Marshall, J., and Tulloch, R.: On the Relationship between Decadal Buoyancy Anomalies and Variability of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, J. Climate, 25, 8009–8030, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00505.1, 2012. a, b
Buckley, M. W., Lozier, M. S., Desbruyères, D., and Evans, D. G.: Buoyancy Forcing and the Subpolar Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 381, 20220181, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2022.0181, 2023. a, b, c
Chafik, L. and Holliday, N. P.: Rapid Communication of Upper-Ocean Salinity Anomaly to Deep Waters of the Iceland Basin Indicates an AMOC Short-Cut, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL097570, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL097570, 2022. a
Chafik, L. and Rossby, T.: Volume, Heat, and Freshwater Divergences in the Subpolar North Atlantic Suggest the Nordic Seas as Key to the State of the Meridional Overturning Circulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 4799–4808, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082110, 2019. a, b
Chafik, L., Holliday, N. P., Bacon, S., and Rossby, T.: Irminger Sea Is the Center of Action for Subpolar AMOC Variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL099133, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099133, 2022. a, b
Chafik, L., Penny Holliday, N., Bacon, S., Baker, J. A., Desbruyères, D., Frajka-Williams, E., and Jackson, L. C.: Observed Mechanisms Activating the Recent Subpolar North Atlantic Warming since 2016, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 381, 20220183, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2022.0183, 2023. a, b
Chenillat, F., Blanke, B., Grima, N., Franks, P. J. S., Capet, X., and Rivière, P.: Quantifying Tracer Dynamics in Moving Fluids: A Combined Eulerian-Lagrangian Approach, Front. Environ. Sci., 3, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2015.00043, 2015. a
Collins, M. and Sinha, B.: Predictability of Decadal Variations in the Thermohaline Circulation and Climate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 2002GL016504, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016504, 2003. a
Curry, R. G. and McCartney, M. S.: Ocean Gyre Circulation Changes Associated with the North Atlantic Oscillation, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 31, 3374–3400, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2001)031<3374:OGCCAW>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Curry, R. G., McCartney, M. S., and Joyce, T. M.: Oceanic Transport of Subpolar Climate Signals to Mid-Depth Subtropical Waters, Nature, 391, 575–577, https://doi.org/10.1038/35356, 1998. a
Daniault, N., Mercier, H., Lherminier, P., Sarafanov, A., Falina, A., Zunino, P., Pérez, F. F., Ríos, A. F., Ferron, B., Huck, T., Thierry, V., and Gladyshev, S.: The Northern North Atlantic Ocean Mean Circulation in the Early 21st Century, Prog. Oceanogr., 146, 142–158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2016.06.007, 2016. a, b
Delworth, T. L. and Zeng, F.: Multicentennial Variability of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation and Its Climatic Influence in a 4000 Year Simulation of the GFDL CM2.1 Climate Model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, 2012GL052107, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052107, 2012. a
Delworth, T. L. and Zeng, F.: The Impact of the North Atlantic Oscillation on Climate through Its Influence on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, J. Climate, 29, 941–962, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0396.1, 2016. a
Desbruyères, D., Thierry, V., and Mercier, H.: Simulated Decadal Variability of the Meridional Overturning Circulation across the A25-Ovide Section, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118, 462–475, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008342, 2013. a
Desbruyères, D., Mercier, H., and Thierry, V.: On the Mechanisms behind Decadal Heat Content Changes in the Eastern Subpolar Gyre, Prog. Oceanogr., 132, 262–272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.02.005, 2015. a
Desbruyères, D., Chafik, L., and Maze, G.: A Shift in the Ocean Circulation Has Warmed the Subpolar North Atlantic Ocean since 2016, Commun. Earth Environ., 2, 48, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00120-y, 2021. a
Devana, M. S., Johns, W. E., Houk, A., and Zou, S.: Rapid Freshening of Iceland Scotland Overflow Water Driven by Entrainment of a Major Upper Ocean Salinity Anomaly, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL094396 , https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094396, 2021. a
de Vries, P. and Weber, S. L.: The Atlantic Freshwater Budget as a Diagnostic for the Existence of a Stable Shut down of the Meridional Overturning Circulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, 2004GL021450, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021450, 2005. a
Döös, K.: Interocean Exchange of Water Masses, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 100, 13499–13514, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JC00337, 1995. a
d'Orgeville, M. and Peltier, W. R.: On the Pacific Decadal Oscillation and the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation: Might They Be Related?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, 2007GL031584, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031584, 2007. a
Eden, C. and Willebrand, J.: Mechanism of Interannual to Decadal Variability of the North Atlantic Circulation, J. Climate, 14, 2266–2280, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<2266:MOITDV>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a, b
Eldevik, T., Nilsen, J. E. Ø., Iovino, D., Anders Olsson, K., Sandø, A. B., and Drange, H.: Observed Sources and Variability of Nordic Seas Overflow, Nat. Geosci., 2, 406–410, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo518, 2009. a
Evans, D. G., Holliday, N. P., Bacon, S., and Le Bras, I.: Mixing and Air–Sea Buoyancy Fluxes Set the Time-Mean Overturning Circulation in the Subpolar North Atlantic and Nordic Seas, Ocean Sci., 19, 745–768, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-745-2023, 2023. a
Fan, H., Borchert, L. F., Brune, S., Koul, V., and Baehr, J.: North Atlantic Subpolar Gyre Provides Downstream Ocean Predictability, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 6, 145, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00469-1, 2023. a, b
Feng, S. and Hu, Q.: How the North Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation May Have Influenced the Indian Summer Monsoon during the Past Two Millennia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, 2007GL032 484, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032484, 2008. a
Fraser, N. J. and Cunningham, S. A.: 120 Years of AMOC Variability Reconstructed From Observations Using the Bernoulli Inverse, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL093893, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093893, 2021. a
Fröhle, J., Handmann, P. V. K., and Biastoch, A.: Major Sources of North Atlantic Deep Water in the Subpolar North Atlantic from Lagrangian Analyses in an Eddy-Rich Ocean Model, Ocean Sci., 18, 1431–1450, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-1431-2022, 2022. a, b
Fu, Y., Li, F., Karstensen, J., and Wang, C.: A Stable Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in a Changing North Atlantic Ocean since the 1990s, Sci. Adv., 6, eabc7836, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc7836, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f
Fu, Y., Lozier, M. S., Biló, T. C., Bower, A. S., Cunningham, S. A., Cyr, F., de Jong, M. F., de Young, B., Drysdale, L., Fraser, N., Fried, N., Furey, H. H., Han, G., Handmann, P., Holliday, N. P., Holte, J., Inall, M. E., Johns, W. E., Jones, S., Karstensen, J., Li, F., Pacini, A., Pickart, R. S., Rayner, D., Straneo, F., and Yashayaev, I.: Seasonality of the Meridional Overturning Circulation in the Subpolar North Atlantic, Commun. Earth Environ., 4, 181, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00848-9, 2023a. a, b
Fu, Y, Lozier, M. S, Biló, T. C., Bower, A. S., Cunningham, S. A., Cyr, F., de Jong, M. F., deYoung, B., Drysdale, L., Fraser, N., Fried, N., Furey, H. H., Han, G., Handmann, P., Holliday, N. P., Holte, J., Inall, M. E., Johns, W. E., Jones, S., and Karstensen, J.: Meridional Overturning Circulation Observed by the Overturning in the Subpolar North Atlantic Program (OSNAP) Array from August 2014 to June 2020, Georgia Tech Digital Repository [data set], https://doi.org/10.35090/gatech/70342, 2023b. a
Fu, Y., Lozier, M. S., Majumder, S., and Petit, T.: Water Mass Transformation and Its Relationship With the Overturning Circulation in the Eastern Subpolar North Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 129, e2024JC021222, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JC021222, 2024. a
Georgiou, S., Ypma, S. L., Brüggemann, N., Sayol, J.-M., Pietrzak, J. D., and Katsman, C. A.: Pathways of the Water Masses Exiting the Labrador Sea: The Importance of Boundary–Interior Exchanges, Ocean Model., 150, 101623, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2020.101623, 2020. a
Georgiou, S., Ypma, S. L., Brüggemann, N., Sayol, J.-M., Van Der Boog, C. G., Spence, P., Pietrzak, J. D., and Katsman, C. A.: Direct and Indirect Pathways of Convected Water Masses and Their Impacts on the Overturning Dynamics of the Labrador Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 126, e2020JC016654, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016654, 2021. a, b
Good, S. A., Martin, M. J., and Rayner, N. A.: EN4: Quality Controlled Ocean Temperature and Salinity Profiles and Monthly Objective Analyses with Uncertainty Estimates, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118, 6704–6716, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009067, 2013. a
Goswami, B. N., Madhusoodanan, M. S., Neema, C. P., and Sengupta, D.: A Physical Mechanism for North Atlantic SST Influence on the Indian Summer Monsoon, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, 2005GL024803, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024803, 2006. a
Grist, J. P., Josey, S. A., Marsh, R., Good, S. A., Coward, A. C., De Cuevas, B. A., Alderson, S. G., New, A. L., and Madec, G.: The Roles of Surface Heat Flux and Ocean Heat Transport Convergence in Determining Atlantic Ocean Temperature Variability, Ocean Dynam., 60, 771–790, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-010-0292-4, 2010. a
Guiavarc'h, C., Storkey, D., Blaker, A. T., Blockley, E., Megann, A., Hewitt, H., Bell, M. J., Calvert, D., Copsey, D., Sinha, B., Moreton, S., Mathiot, P., and An, B.: GOSI9: UK Global Ocean and Sea Ice Configurations, Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 377–403, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-377-2025, 2025. a, b
Hermanson, L., Dunstone, N., Haines, K., Robson, J., Smith, D., and Sutton, R.: A Novel Transport Assimilation Method for the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation at 26° N, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 140, 2563–2572, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2321, 2014. a
Heuzé, C.: North Atlantic Deep Water Formation and AMOC in CMIP5 Models, Ocean Sci., 13, 609–622, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-13-609-2017, 2017. a
Heuzé, C.: Antarctic Bottom Water and North Atlantic Deep Water in CMIP6 Models, Ocean Sci., 17, 59–90, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-59-2021, 2021. a
Hirschi, J. J.-M., Barnier, B., Böning, C., Biastoch, A., Blaker, A. T., Coward, A., Danilov, S., Drijfhout, S., Getzlaff, K., Griffies, S. M., Hasumi, H., Hewitt, H., Iovino, D., Kawasaki, T., Kiss, A. E., Koldunov, N., Marzocchi, A., Mecking, J. V., Moat, B., Molines, J.-M., Myers, P. G., Penduff, T., Roberts, M., Treguier, A.-M., Sein, D. V., Sidorenko, D., Small, J., Spence, P., Thompson, L., Weijer, W., and Xu, X.: The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in High-Resolution Models, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2019JC015522, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015522, 2020. a, b
Holliday, N. P., Hughes, S. L., Bacon, S., Beszczynska-Möller, A., Hansen, B., Lavín, A., Loeng, H., Mork, K. A., Østerhus, S., Sherwin, T., and Walczowski, W.: Reversal of the 1960s to 1990s Freshening Trend in the Northeast North Atlantic and Nordic Seas, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, 2007GL032675, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032675, 2008. a
Holliday, N. P., Bacon, S., Cunningham, S. A., Gary, S. F., Karstensen, J., King, B. A., Li, F., and Mcdonagh, E. L.: Subpolar North Atlantic Overturning and Gyre-Scale Circulation in the Summers of 2014 and 2016, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 4538–4559, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC013841, 2018. a
Holliday, N. P., Bersch, M., Berx, B., Chafik, L., Cunningham, S., Florindo-López, C., Hátún, H., Johns, W., Josey, S. A., Larsen, K. M. H., Mulet, S., Oltmanns, M., Reverdin, G., Rossby, T., Thierry, V., Valdimarsson, H., and Yashayaev, I.: Ocean Circulation Causes the Largest Freshening Event for 120 Years in Eastern Subpolar North Atlantic, Nat. Commun., 11, 585, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14474-y, 2020. a
Hurrell, J. W.: Decadal Trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation: Regional Temperatures and Precipitation, Science, 269, 676–679, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.269.5224.676, 1995. a
Isachsen, P. E., Mauritzen, C., and Svendsen, H.: Dense Water Formation in the Nordic Seas Diagnosed from Sea Surface Buoyancy Fluxes, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 54, 22–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2006.09.008, 2007. a
Jackson, L. C. and Petit, T.: North Atlantic Overturning and Water Mass Transformation in CMIP6 Models, Clim. Dynam., 60, 2871–2891, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06448-1, 2023. a
Jackson, L. C., Biastoch, A., Buckley, M. W., Desbruyères, D. G., Frajka-Williams, E., Moat, B., and Robson, J.: The Evolution of the North Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation since 1980, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 3, 241–254, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00263-2, 2022. a
Jacobs, Z. L., Grist, J. P., Marsh, R., and Josey, S. A.: A Subannual Subsurface Pathway From the Gulf Stream to the Subpolar Gyre and Its Role in Warming and Salinification in the 1990s, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 7518–7526, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083021, 2019. a
Jones, B. T., Solow, A., and Ji, R.: Resource Allocation for Lagrangian Tracking, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 33, 1225–1235, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0115.1, 2016. a
Keenlyside, N. S., Latif, M., Jungclaus, J., Kornblueh, L., and Roeckner, E.: Advancing Decadal-Scale Climate Prediction in the North Atlantic Sector, Nature, 453, 84–88, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06921, 2008. a
Khatri, H., Williams, R. G., Woollings, T., and Smith, D. M.: Fast and Slow Subpolar Ocean Responses to the North Atlantic Oscillation: Thermal and Dynamical Changes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL101480, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL101480, 2022. a, b
Kieke, D., Rhein, M., Stramma, L., Smethie, W. M., Bullister, J. L., and LeBel, D. A.: Changes in the Pool of Labrador Sea Water in the Subpolar North Atlantic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L06605, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028959, 2007. a
Kim, W. M., Yeager, S., Chang, P., and Danabasoglu, G.: Low-Frequency North Atlantic Climate Variability in the Community Earth System Model Large Ensemble, J. Climate, 31, 787–813, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0193.1, 2018. a
Kim, W. M., Yeager, S., and Danabasoglu, G.: Atlantic Multidecadal Variability and Associated Climate Impacts Initiated by Ocean Thermohaline Dynamics, J. Climate, 33, 1317–1334, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0530.1, 2020. a
Kim, W. M., Ruprich-Robert, Y., Zhao, A., Yeager, S., and Robson, J.: North Atlantic Response to Observed North Atlantic Oscillation Surface Heat Flux in Three Climate Models, J. Climate, 37, 1777–1796, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0301.1, 2024. a
Koman, G., Johns, W., Houk, A., Houpert, L., and Li, F.: Circulation and Overturning in the Eastern North Atlantic Subpolar Gyre, Prog. Oceanogr., 208, 102884, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102884, 2022. a
Koman, G., Bower, A. S., Holliday, N. P., Furey, H. H., Fu, Y., and Biló, T. C.: Observed Decrease in Deep Western Boundary Current Transport in Subpolar North Atlantic, Nat. Geosci., 17, 1148–1153, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01555-6, 2024. a
Kostov, Y., Messias, M.-J., Mercier, H., Johnson, H. L., and Marshall, D. P.: Fast Mechanisms Linking the Labrador Sea with Subtropical Atlantic Overturning, Clim. Dynam., 60, 2687–2712, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06459-y, 2023. a, b
Kostov, Y., Messias, M.-J., Mercier, H., Marshall, D. P., and Johnson, H. L.: Surface Factors Controlling the Volume of Accumulated Labrador Sea Water, Ocean Sci., 20, 521–547, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-521-2024, 2024. a
Koul, V., Tesdal, J.-E., Bersch, M., Hátún, H., Brune, S., Borchert, L., Haak, H., Schrum, C., and Baehr, J.: Unraveling the Choice of the North Atlantic Subpolar Gyre Index, Sci. Rep., 10, 1005, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-57790-5, 2020. a
Le Bras, I., Straneo, F., Muilwijk, M., Smedsrud, L. H., Li, F., Lozier, M. S., and Holliday, N. P.: How Much Arctic Fresh Water Participates in the Subpolar Overturning Circulation?, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 51, 955–973, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-20-0240.1, 2021. a
Li, F., Lozier, M. S., Bacon, S., Bower, A. S., Cunningham, S. A., de Jong, M. F., de Young, B., Fraser, N., Fried, N., Han, G., Holliday, N. P., Holte, J., Houpert, L., Inall, M. E., Johns, W. E., Jones, S., Johnson, C., Karstensen, J., Le Bras, I. A., Lherminier, P., Lin, X., Mercier, H., Oltmanns, M., Pacini, A., Petit, T., Pickart, R. S., Rayner, D., Straneo, F., Thierry, V., Visbeck, M., Yashayaev, I., and Zhou, C.: Subpolar North Atlantic Western Boundary Density Anomalies and the Meridional Overturning Circulation, Nat. Commun., 12, 3002, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23350-2, 2021. a
Li, J., Sun, C., and Jin, F.-F.: NAO Implicated as a Predictor of Northern Hemisphere Mean Temperature Multidecadal Variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 5497–5502, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL057877, 2013. a
Lozier, M. S. and Stewart, N. M.: On the Temporally Varying Northward Penetration of Mediterranean Overflow Water and Eastward Penetration of Labrador Sea Water, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 38, 2097–2103, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JPO3908.1, 2008. a
Lozier, M. S., Li, F., Bacon, S., Bahr, F., Bower, A. S., Cunningham, S. A., de Jong, M. F., de Steur, L., deYoung, B., Fischer, J., Gary, S. F., Greenan, B. J. W., Holliday, N. P., Houk, A., Houpert, L., Inall, M. E., Johns, W. E., Johnson, H. L., Johnson, C., Karstensen, J., Koman, G., Le Bras, I. A., Lin, X., Mackay, N., Marshall, D. P., Mercier, H., Oltmanns, M., Pickart, R. S., Ramsey, A. L., Rayner, D., Straneo, F., Thierry, V., Torres, D. J., Williams, R. G., Wilson, C., Yang, J., Yashayaev, I., and Zhao, J.: A Sea Change in Our View of Overturning in the Subpolar North Atlantic, Science, 363, 516–521, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6592, 2019. a
Luo, F., Li, S., and Furevik, T.: The Connection between the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation and the Indian Summer Monsoon in Bergen Climate Model Version 2.0, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D19117, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015848, 2011. a
MacGilchrist, G. A., Johnson, H. L., Marshall, D. P., Lique, C., Thomas, M., Jackson, L. C., and Wood, R. A.: Locations and Mechanisms of Ocean Ventilation in the High-Latitude North Atlantic in an Eddy-Permitting Ocean Model, J. Climate, 33, 10113–10131, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0191.1, 2020. a
Madec, G., Bourdallé-Badie, R., Chanut, J., Clementi, E., Coward, A., Ethé, C., Iovino, D., Lea, D., Lévy, C., Lovato, T., Martin, N., Masson, S., Mocavero, S., Rousset, C., Storkey, D., Vancoppenolle, M., Müeller, S., Nurser, G., Bell, M., and Samson, G.: NEMO Ocean Engine, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3878122, 2019. a, b
Markina, M. Y., Johnson, H. L., and Marshall, D. P.: Response of Subpolar North Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation to Variability in Surface Winds on Different Timescales, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 54, 1871–1887, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-23-0236.1, 2024. a
Marotzke, J., Müller, W. A., Vamborg, F. S. E., Becker, P., Cubasch, U., Feldmann, H., Kaspar, F., Kottmeier, C., Marini, C., Polkova, I., Prömmel, K., Rust, H. W., Stammer, D., Ulbrich, U., Kadow, C., Köhl, A., Kröger, J., Kruschke, T., Pinto, J. G., Pohlmann, H., Reyers, M., Schröder, M., Sienz, F., Timmreck, C., and Ziese, M.: MiKlip: A National Research Project on Decadal Climate Prediction, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 2379–2394, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00184.1, 2016. a
Marsh, R.: Recent Variability of the North Atlantic Thermohaline Circulation Inferred from Surface Heat and Freshwater Fluxes, J. Climate, 13, 3239–3260, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<3239:RVOTNA>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a
Marshall, J., Johnson, H., and Goodman, J.: A Study of the Interaction of the North Atlantic Oscillation with Ocean Circulation, J. Climate, 14, 1399–1421, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<1399:ASOTIO>2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Martin, E. R. and Thorncroft, C. D.: The Impact of the AMO on the West African Monsoon Annual Cycle, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 140, 31–46, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2107, 2014. a
Martin, E. R., Thorncroft, C., and Booth, B. B. B.: The Multidecadal Atlantic SST – Sahel Rainfall Teleconnection in CMIP5 Simulations, J. Climate, 27, 784–806, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00242.1, 2014. a
Mauritzen, C.: Production of Dense Overflow Waters Feeding the North Atlantic across the Greenland-Scotland Ridge. Part 1: Evidence for a Revised Circulation Scheme, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 43, 769–806, https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(96)00037-4, 1996. a
McDougall, T. J., Jackett, D. R., Millero, F. J., Pawlowicz, R., and Barker, P. M.: A Global Algorithm for Estimating Absolute Salinity, Ocean Sci., 8, 1123–1134, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-1123-2012, 2012. a
Megann, A., Blaker, A., Coward, A., Guiavarc'h, C., and Storkey, D.: Model Output from ° Global JRA55-forced Integration of GO8p7 Global Ocean-Sea Ice Model from 1958 to 2021, CEDA Archive [data set], https://doi.org/10.5285/399B0F762A004657A411A9EA7203493A, 2022. a, b, c
Menary, M. B., Park, W., Lohmann, K., Vellinga, M., Palmer, M. D., Latif, M., and Jungclaus, J. H.: A Multimodel Comparison of Centennial Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation Variability, Clim. Dynam., 38, 2377–2388, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1172-4, 2012. a
Mercier, H., Desbruyères, D., Lherminier, P., Velo, A., Carracedo, L., Fontela, M., and Pérez, F. F.: New Insights into the Eastern Subpolar North Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation from OVIDE, Ocean Sci., 20, 779–797, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-20-779-2024, 2024. a, b
Msadek, R., Delworth, T. L., Rosati, A., Anderson, W., Vecchi, G., Chang, Y.-S., Dixon, K., Gudgel, R. G., Stern, W., Wittenberg, A., Yang, X., Zeng, F., Zhang, R., and Zhang, S.: Predicting a Decadal Shift in North Atlantic Climate Variability Using the GFDL Forecast System, J. Climate, 27, 6472–6496, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00476.1, 2014. a
Ortega, P., Robson, J., Sutton, R. T., and Andrews, M. B.: Mechanisms of Decadal Variability in the Labrador Sea and the Wider North Atlantic in a High-Resolution Climate Model, Clim. Dynam., 49, 2625–2647, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3467-y, 2017. a
Ortega, P., Robson, J. I., Menary, M., Sutton, R. T., Blaker, A., Germe, A., Hirschi, J. J.-M., Sinha, B., Hermanson, L., and Yeager, S.: Labrador Sea Subsurface Density as a Precursor of Multidecadal Variability in the North Atlantic: A Multi-Model Study, Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 419–438, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-419-2021, 2021. a
Østerhus, S., Woodgate, R., Valdimarsson, H., Turrell, B., De Steur, L., Quadfasel, D., Olsen, S. M., Moritz, M., Lee, C. M., Larsen, K. M. H., Jónsson, S., Johnson, C., Jochumsen, K., Hansen, B., Curry, B., Cunningham, S., and Berx, B.: Arctic Mediterranean Exchanges: A Consistent Volume Budget and Trends in Transports from Two Decades of Observations, Ocean Sci., 15, 379–399, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-379-2019, 2019. a, b, c, d
Passos, L., Langehaug, H. R., Årthun, M., and Straneo, F.: On the Relation between Thermohaline Anomalies and Water Mass Transformation in the Eastern Subpolar North Atlantic, J. Climate, 37, 4821–4834, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0379.1, 2024. a, b
Petit, T., Robson, J., Ferreira, D., and Jackson, L. C.: Understanding the Sensitivity of the North Atlantic Subpolar Overturning in Different Resolution Versions of HadGEM3-GC3.1, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 128, e2023JC019672, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JC019672, 2023. a, b
Rahmstorf, S.: On the Freshwater Forcing and Transport of the Atlantic Thermohaline Circulation:, Clim. Dynam., 12, 799–811, https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050144, 1996. a
Reintges, A., Robson, J. I., Sutton, R., and Yeager, S. G.: Subpolar North Atlantic Mean State Affects the Response of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation to the North Atlantic Oscillation in CMIP6 Models, J. Climate, 37, 5543–5559, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0470.1, 2024. a
Rhein, M., Kieke, D., Hüttl-Kabus, S., Roessler, A., Mertens, C., Meissner, R., Klein, B., Böning, C. W., and Yashayaev, I.: Deep Water Formation, the Subpolar Gyre, and the Meridional Overturning Circulation in the Subpolar North Atlantic, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 58, 1819–1832, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.10.061, 2011. a
Roach, C. J. and Speer, K.: Exchange of Water Between the Ross Gyre and ACC Assessed by Lagrangian Particle Tracking, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 124, 4631–4643, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014845, 2019. a
Robson, J., Sutton, R., Lohmann, K., Smith, D., and Palmer, M. D.: Causes of the Rapid Warming of the North Atlantic Ocean in the Mid-1990s, J. Climate, 25, 4116–4134, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00443.1, 2012. a, b
Robson, J., Ortega, P., and Sutton, R.: A Reversal of Climatic Trends in the North Atlantic since 2005, Nat. Geosci., 9, 513–517, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2727, 2016. a
Roussenov, V. M., Williams, R. G., Lozier, M. S., Holliday, N. P., and Smith, D. M.: Historical Reconstruction of Subpolar North Atlantic Overturning and Its Relationship to Density, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 127, e2021JC017732, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JC017732, 2022. a, b
Sarafanov, A., Falina, A., Mercier, H., Sokov, A., Lherminier, P., Gourcuff, C., Gladyshev, S., Gaillard, F., and Daniault, N.: Mean Full-Depth Summer Circulation and Transports at the Northern Periphery of the Atlantic Ocean in the 2000s, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 117, C01014, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007572, 2012. a, b
Sgubin, G., Swingedouw, D., Drijfhout, S., Mary, Y., and Bennabi, A.: Abrupt Cooling over the North Atlantic in Modern Climate Models, Nat. Commun., 8, 14375, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14375, 2017. a
Smith, D. M., Eade, R., Scaife, A. A., Caron, L.-P., Danabasoglu, G., DelSole, T. M., Delworth, T., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Dunstone, N. J., Hermanson, L., Kharin, V., Kimoto, M., Merryfield, W. J., Mochizuki, T., Müller, W. A., Pohlmann, H., Yeager, S., and Yang, X.: Robust Skill of Decadal Climate Predictions, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 2, 13, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0071-y, 2019. a
Speer, K. and Tziperman, E.: Rates of Water Mass Formation in the North Atlantic Ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 22, 93–104, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1992)022<0093:ROWMFI>2.0.CO;2, 1992. a, b
Stommel, H.: Thermohaline Convection with Two Stable Regimes of Flow, Tellus, 13, 224–230, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1961.tb00079.x, 1961. a
Straneo, F. and Heimbach, P.: North Atlantic Warming and the Retreat of Greenland's Outlet Glaciers, Nature, 504, 36–43, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12854, 2013. a
Swingedouw, D., Ifejika Speranza, C., Bartsch, A., Durand, G., Jamet, C., Beaugrand, G., and Conversi, A.: Early Warning from Space for a Few Key Tipping Points in Physical, Biological, and Social-Ecological Systems, Surv. Geophys., 41, 1237–1284, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-020-09604-6, 2020. a
Swingedouw, D., Bily, A., Esquerdo, C., Borchert, L. F., Sgubin, G., Mignot, J., and Menary, M.: On the Risk of Abrupt Changes in the North Atlantic Subpolar Gyre in CMIP6 Models, Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 1504, 187–201, https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14659, 2021. a
Tooth, O. J., Johnson, H. L., and Wilson, C.: Lagrangian Overturning Pathways in the Eastern Subpolar North Atlantic, J. Climate, 36, 823–844, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0985.1, 2023a. a, b, c, d
Tooth, O. J., Johnson, H. L., Wilson, C., and Evans, D. G.: Seasonal Overturning Variability in the Eastern North Atlantic Subpolar Gyre: A Lagrangian Perspective, Ocean Sci., 19, 769–791, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-769-2023, 2023b. a, b, c
Tooth, O., Aitor Aldama-Campino, and Döös, K.: oj-tooth/Tracmass_v7.1: v0.1.0 (v0.1.0), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17105628, 2025a. a
Tooth, O.: Controls on Dense Water Formation along the path of the North Atlantic Subpolar Gyre – Water Parcel Crossings of the OSNAP Array (Version v1), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14870254, 2025b. a
Tooth, O.: oj-tooth/lt_toolbox: v0.1.0 (v0.1), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15838857, 2025c. a
Tsujino, H., Urakawa, S., Nakano, H., Small, R. J., Kim, W. M., Yeager, S. G., Danabasoglu, G., Suzuki, T., Bamber, J. L., Bentsen, M., Böning, C. W., Bozec, A., Chassignet, E. P., Curchitser, E., Boeira Dias, F., Durack, P. J., Griffies, S. M., Harada, Y., Ilicak, M., Josey, S. A., Kobayashi, C., Kobayashi, S., Komuro, Y., Large, W. G., Le Sommer, J., Marsland, S. J., Masina, S., Scheinert, M., Tomita, H., Valdivieso, M., and Yamazaki, D.: JRA-55 Based Surface Dataset for Driving Ocean–Sea-Ice Models (JRA55-do), Ocean Model., 130, 79–139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2018.07.002, 2018. a
Vancoppenolle, M., Rousset, C., Blockley, E., Aksenov, Y., Feltham, D., Fichefet, T., Garric, G., Guémas, V., Iovino, D., Keeley, S., Madec, G., Massonnet, F., Ridley, J., Schroeder, D., and Tietsche, S.: SI3, the NEMO Sea Ice Engine, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7534900, 2023. a
Wåhlin, A. K. and Johnson, H. L.: The Salinity, Heat, and Buoyancy Budgets of a Coastal Current in a Marginal Sea, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 39, 2562–2580, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JPO4090.1, 2009. a, b
Walin, G.: On the Relation between Sea-Surface Heat Flow and Thermal Circulation in the Ocean, Tellus A, 34, 187–195, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v34i2.10801, 1982. a
Wang, H., Zhao, J., Li, F., and Lin, X.: Seasonal and Interannual Variability of the Meridional Overturning Circulation in the Subpolar North Atlantic Diagnosed From a High Resolution Reanalysis Data Set, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 126, e2020JC017130, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC017130, 2021. a
Xu, X., Rhines, P. B., and Chassignet, E. P.: On Mapping the Diapycnal Water Mass Transformation of the Upper North Atlantic Ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 48, 2233–2258, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0223.1, 2018. a
Yashayaev, I.: Hydrographic Changes in the Labrador Sea, 1960–2005, Prog. Oceanogr., 73, 242–276, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2007.04.015, 2007. a
Yashayaev, I. and Seidov, D.: The Role of the Atlantic Water in Multidecadal Ocean Variability in the Nordic and Barents Seas, Prog. Oceanogr., 132, 68–127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.11.009, 2015. a
Yashayaev, I., Bersch, M., and Van Aken, H. M.: Spreading of the Labrador Sea Water to the Irminger and Iceland Basins, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, 2006GL028999, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028999, 2007. a
Yeager, S.: The Abyssal Origins of North Atlantic Decadal Predictability, Clim. Dynam., 55, 2253–2271, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05382-4, 2020. a, b
Yeager, S. and Danabasoglu, G.: The Origins of Late-Twentieth-Century Variations in the Large-Scale North Atlantic Circulation, J. Climate, 27, 3222–3247, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00125.1, 2014. a
Yeager, S., Castruccio, F., Chang, P., Danabasoglu, G., Maroon, E., Small, J., Wang, H., Wu, L., and Zhang, S.: An Outsized Role for the Labrador Sea in the Multidecadal Variability of the Atlantic Overturning Circulation, Sci. Adv., 7, eabh3592, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abh3592, 2021. a, b, c, d
Yeager, S. G. and Robson, J. I.: Recent Progress in Understanding and Predicting Atlantic Decadal Climate Variability, Curr. Clim. Change Rep., 3, 112–127, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0064-z, 2017. a, b
Yeager, S. G., Karspeck, A. R., and Danabasoglu, G.: Predicted Slowdown in the Rate of Atlantic Sea Ice Loss, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 10704–10713, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065364, 2015. a, b
Zantopp, R., Fischer, J., Visbeck, M., and Karstensen, J.: From Interannual to Decadal: 17 Years of Boundary Current Transports at the Exit of the Labrador Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 1724–1748, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012271, 2017. a, b, c
Zhang, R.: Mechanisms for Low-Frequency Variability of Summer Arctic Sea Ice Extent, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 4570–4575, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422296112, 2015. a
Zhang, R., Delworth, T. L., and Held, I. M.: Can the Atlantic Ocean Drive the Observed Multidecadal Variability in Northern Hemisphere Mean Temperature?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, 2006GL028683, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028683, 2007. a
Zhang, R., Sutton, R., Danabasoglu, G., Kwon, Y.-O., Marsh, R., Yeager, S. G., Amrhein, D. E., and Little, C. M.: A Review of the Role of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in Atlantic Multidecadal Variability and Associated Climate Impacts, Rev. Geophys., 57, 316–375, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000644, 2019. a, b
Zou, S. and Lozier, M. S.: Breaking the Linkage Between Labrador Sea Water Production and Its Advective Export to the Subtropical Gyre, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 46, 2169–2182, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-15-0210.1, 2016. a
Zou, S., Lozier, M. S., Li, F., Abernathey, R., and Jackson, L.: Density-Compensated Overturning in the Labrador Sea, Nat. Geosci., 13, 121–126, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0517-1, 2020. a