Articles | Volume 18, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-587-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-587-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
03 May 2022
Research article |
| 03 May 2022
| 03 May 2022
Ocean bubbles under high wind conditions – Part 2: Bubble size distributions and implications for models of bubble dynamics
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London,
London, WC1E 7BT, UK
Ian M. Brooks
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT,
UK
Steve Gunn
Department of Electronics and Computer Science, University of
Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
Robin Pascal
National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK
Adrian Matei
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London,
London, WC1E 7BT, UK
Byron Blomquist
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences,
University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
Related authors
Helen Czerski, Ian M. Brooks, Steve Gunn, Robin Pascal, Adrian Matei, and Byron Blomquist
Ocean Sci., 18, 565–586, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-565-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-565-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The bubbles formed by breaking waves speed up the movement of gases like carbon dioxide and oxygen between the atmosphere and the ocean. Understanding where these gases go is an important part of understanding Earth's climate. In this paper we describe measurements of the bubbles close to the ocean surface during big storms in the North Atlantic. We observed small bubbles collecting in distinctive patterns which help us to understand the contribution they make to the ocean breathing.
Heather Guy, Andrew S. Martin, Erik Olson, Ian M. Brooks, and Ryan R. Neely III
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-733, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-733, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol particles impact cloud properties which influence Greenland Ice Sheet melt. Understanding the aerosol population that interacts with clouds is important for constraining future melt. Measurements of aerosols at cloud height over Greenland are rare, and surface measurements are often used to investigate cloud-aerosol interactions. We use a tethered balloon to measure aerosols up to cloud base and show that surface measurements are often not equivalent to those just below the cloud.
Gillian Young McCusker, Jutta Vüllers, Peggy Achtert, Paul Field, Jonathan J. Day, Richard Forbes, Ruth Price, Ewan O'Connor, Michael Tjernström, John Prytherch, Ryan Neely III, and Ian M. Brooks
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4819–4847, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4819-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we show that recent versions of two atmospheric models – the Unified Model and Integrated Forecasting System – overestimate Arctic cloud fraction within the lower troposphere by comparison with recent remote-sensing measurements made during the Arctic Ocean 2018 expedition. The overabundance of cloud is interlinked with the modelled thermodynamic structure, with strong negative temperature biases coincident with these overestimated cloud layers.
Ruth Price, Andrea Baccarini, Julia Schmale, Paul Zieger, Ian M. Brooks, Paul Field, and Ken S. Carslaw
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2927–2961, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2927-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2927-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Arctic clouds can control how much energy is absorbed by the surface or reflected back to space. Using a computer model of the atmosphere we investigated the formation of atmospheric particles that allow cloud droplets to form. We found that particles formed aloft are transported to the lowest part of the Arctic atmosphere and that this is a key source of particles. Our results have implications for the way Arctic clouds will behave in the future as climate change continues to impact the region.
Heather Guy, David D. Turner, Von P. Walden, Ian M. Brooks, and Ryan R. Neely
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 5095–5115, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5095-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-5095-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Fog formation is highly sensitive to near-surface temperatures and humidity profiles. Passive remote sensing instruments can provide continuous measurements of the vertical temperature and humidity profiles and liquid water content, which can improve fog forecasts. Here we compare the performance of collocated infrared and microwave remote sensing instruments and demonstrate that the infrared instrument is especially sensitive to the onset of thin radiation fog.
Helen Czerski, Ian M. Brooks, Steve Gunn, Robin Pascal, Adrian Matei, and Byron Blomquist
Ocean Sci., 18, 565–586, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-565-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-565-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The bubbles formed by breaking waves speed up the movement of gases like carbon dioxide and oxygen between the atmosphere and the ocean. Understanding where these gases go is an important part of understanding Earth's climate. In this paper we describe measurements of the bubbles close to the ocean surface during big storms in the North Atlantic. We observed small bubbles collecting in distinctive patterns which help us to understand the contribution they make to the ocean breathing.
Piyush Srivastava, Ian M. Brooks, John Prytherch, Dominic J. Salisbury, Andrew D. Elvidge, Ian A. Renfrew, and Margaret J. Yelland
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4763–4778, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4763-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4763-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The parameterization of surface turbulent fluxes over sea ice remains a weak point in weather forecast and climate models. Recent theoretical developments have introduced more extensive physics but these descriptions are poorly constrained due to a lack of observation data. Here we utilize a large dataset of measurements of turbulent fluxes over sea ice to tune the state-of-the-art parameterization of wind stress, and compare it with a previous scheme.
Heather Guy, Ian M. Brooks, Ken S. Carslaw, Benjamin J. Murray, Von P. Walden, Matthew D. Shupe, Claire Pettersen, David D. Turner, Christopher J. Cox, William D. Neff, Ralf Bennartz, and Ryan R. Neely III
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15351–15374, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15351-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15351-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present the first full year of surface aerosol number concentration measurements from the central Greenland Ice Sheet. Aerosol concentrations here have a distinct seasonal cycle from those at lower-altitude Arctic sites, which is driven by large-scale atmospheric circulation. Our results can be used to help understand the role aerosols might play in Greenland surface melt through the modification of cloud properties. This is crucial in a rapidly changing region where observations are sparse.
Jutta Vüllers, Peggy Achtert, Ian M. Brooks, Michael Tjernström, John Prytherch, Annika Burzik, and Ryan Neely III
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 289–314, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-289-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-289-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper provides interesting new results on the thermodynamic structure of the boundary layer, cloud conditions, and fog characteristics in the Arctic during the Arctic Ocean 2018 campaign. It provides information for interpreting further process studies on aerosol–cloud interactions and shows substantial differences in thermodynamic conditions and cloud characteristics based on comparison with previous campaigns. This certainly raises the question of whether it is just an exceptional year.
Peggy Achtert, Ewan J. O'Connor, Ian M. Brooks, Georgia Sotiropoulou, Matthew D. Shupe, Bernhard Pospichal, Barbara J. Brooks, and Michael Tjernström
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14983–15002, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14983-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14983-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We present observations of precipitating and non-precipitating Arctic liquid and mixed-phase clouds during a research cruise along the Russian shelf in summer and autumn of 2014. Active remote-sensing observations, radiosondes, and auxiliary measurements are combined in the synergistic Cloudnet retrieval. Cloud properties are analysed with respect to cloud-top temperature and boundary layer structure. About 8 % of all liquid clouds show a liquid water path below the infrared black body limit.
Grace C. E. Porter, Sebastien N. F. Sikora, Michael P. Adams, Ulrike Proske, Alexander D. Harrison, Mark D. Tarn, Ian M. Brooks, and Benjamin J. Murray
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2905–2921, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2905-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2905-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Ice-nucleating particles affect cloud development, lifetime, and radiative properties. Hence it is important to know the abundance of INPs throughout the atmosphere. Here we present the development and application of a radio-controlled payload capable of collecting size-resolved aerosol from a tethered balloon for the primary purpose of offline INP analysis. Test data are presented from four locations: southern Finland, northern England, Svalbard, and southern England.
Markus M. Frey, Sarah J. Norris, Ian M. Brooks, Philip S. Anderson, Kouichi Nishimura, Xin Yang, Anna E. Jones, Michelle G. Nerentorp Mastromonaco, David H. Jones, and Eric W. Wolff
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2549–2578, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2549-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2549-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
A winter sea ice expedition to Antarctica provided the first direct observations of sea salt aerosol (SSA) production during snow storms above sea ice, thereby validating a model hypothesis to account for winter time SSA maxima in Antarctica not explained otherwise. Defining SSA sources is important given the critical roles that aerosol plays for climate, for air quality and as a potential ice core proxy for sea ice conditions in the past.
Mingxi Yang, Sarah J. Norris, Thomas G. Bell, and Ian M. Brooks
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15271–15284, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15271-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15271-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This work reports direct measurements of sea spray fluxes from a coastal site in the UK, which are relevant for atmospheric chemistry as well as coastal air quality. Sea spray fluxes from this location are roughly an order of magnitude greater than over the open ocean at similar wind conditions, comparable to previous coastal measurements. Unlike previous open ocean measurements that are largely wind speed dependent, we find that sea spray fluxes near the coast depend more strongly on waves.
Xin Yang, Markus M. Frey, Rachael H. Rhodes, Sarah J. Norris, Ian M. Brooks, Philip S. Anderson, Kouichi Nishimura, Anna E. Jones, and Eric W. Wolff
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8407–8424, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8407-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8407-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
This is a comprehensive model–data comparison aiming to evaluate the proposed mechanism of sea salt aerosol (SSA) production from blowing snow on sea ice. Some key parameters such as snow salinity and blowing-snow size distribution were constrained by data collected in the Weddell Sea. The good agreement between modelled SSA and the cruise data strongly indicates that sea ice surface is a large SSA source in polar regions, a process which has not been considered in current climate models.
Angela Benedetti, Jeffrey S. Reid, Peter Knippertz, John H. Marsham, Francesca Di Giuseppe, Samuel Rémy, Sara Basart, Olivier Boucher, Ian M. Brooks, Laurent Menut, Lucia Mona, Paolo Laj, Gelsomina Pappalardo, Alfred Wiedensohler, Alexander Baklanov, Malcolm Brooks, Peter R. Colarco, Emilio Cuevas, Arlindo da Silva, Jeronimo Escribano, Johannes Flemming, Nicolas Huneeus, Oriol Jorba, Stelios Kazadzis, Stefan Kinne, Thomas Popp, Patricia K. Quinn, Thomas T. Sekiyama, Taichu Tanaka, and Enric Terradellas
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10615–10643, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10615-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10615-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Numerical prediction of aerosol particle properties has become an important activity at many research and operational weather centers. This development is due to growing interest from a diverse set of stakeholders, such as air quality regulatory bodies, aviation authorities, solar energy plant managers, climate service providers, and health professionals. This paper describes the advances in the field and sets out requirements for observations for the sustainability of these activities.
Mingxi Yang, Thomas G. Bell, Frances E. Hopkins, Vassilis Kitidis, Pierre W. Cazenave, Philip D. Nightingale, Margaret J. Yelland, Robin W. Pascal, John Prytherch, Ian M. Brooks, and Timothy J. Smyth
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5745–5761, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5745-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5745-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Coastal seas are sources of methane in the atmosphere and can fluctuate from emitting to absorbing carbon dioxide. Direct air–sea transport measurements of these two greenhouse gases in near shore regions remain scarce. From a recently established coastal atmospheric station on the south-west coast of the UK, we observed that the oceanic absorption of carbon dioxide peaked during the phytoplankton bloom, while methane emission varied with the tidal cycle, likely due to an estuary influence.
Michelle J. Kim, Matthew C. Zoerb, Nicole R. Campbell, Kathryn J. Zimmermann, Byron W. Blomquist, Barry J. Huebert, and Timothy H. Bertram
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1473–1484, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1473-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1473-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Benzene cluster cations were revisited as a sensitive and selective reagent ion for the chemical ionization of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and a select group of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Laboratory and field measurements were used to assess the sensitivity of the ionization scheme under a wide array of operating condition. Underway measurements of DMS in the North Atlantic were validated against an atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometer.
P. Achtert, I. M. Brooks, B. J. Brooks, B. I. Moat, J. Prytherch, P. O. G. Persson, and M. Tjernström
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4993–5007, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4993-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4993-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Doppler lidar wind measurements were obtained during a 3-month Arctic cruise in summer 2014. Ship-motion effects were compensated by combining a commercial Doppler lidar with a custom-made motion-stabilisation platform. This enables the retrieval of wind profiles in the Arctic boundary layer with uncertainties comparable to land-based lidar measurements and standard radiosondes. The presented set-up has the potential to facilitate continuous ship-based wind profile measurements over the oceans.
J. Prytherch, M. J. Yelland, I. M. Brooks, D. J. Tupman, R. W. Pascal, B. I. Moat, and S. J. Norris
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10619–10629, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10619-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10619-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Signals at scales associated with wave and platform motion are often apparent in ship-based turbulent flux measurements, but it has been uncertain whether this is due to measurement error or to wind-wave interactions. We show that the signal has a dependence on horizontal ship velocity and that removing the signal reduces the dependence of the momentum flux on the orientation of the ship to the wind. We conclude that the signal is a bias due to time-varying motion-dependent flow distortion.
G. Sotiropoulou, J. Sedlar, M. Tjernström, M. D. Shupe, I. M. Brooks, and P. O. G. Persson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12573–12592, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12573-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12573-2014, 2014
Short summary
Short summary
During ASCOS, clouds are more frequently decoupled from the surface than coupled to it; when coupling occurs it is primary driven by the cloud. Decoupled clouds have a bimodal structure; they are either weakly or strongly decoupled from the surface; the enhancement of the decoupling is possibly due to sublimation of precipitation. Stable clouds (no cloud-driven mixing) are also observed; those are optically thin, often single-phase liquid, with no or negligible precipitation (e.g. fog).
S. Coburn, I. Ortega, R. Thalman, B. Blomquist, C. W. Fairall, and R. Volkamer
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3579–3595, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3579-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3579-2014, 2014
M. Yang, R. Beale, P. Liss, M. Johnson, B. Blomquist, and P. Nightingale
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7499–7517, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7499-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7499-2014, 2014
M. Tjernström, C. Leck, C. E. Birch, J. W. Bottenheim, B. J. Brooks, I. M. Brooks, L. Bäcklin, R. Y.-W. Chang, G. de Leeuw, L. Di Liberto, S. de la Rosa, E. Granath, M. Graus, A. Hansel, J. Heintzenberg, A. Held, A. Hind, P. Johnston, J. Knulst, M. Martin, P. A. Matrai, T. Mauritsen, M. Müller, S. J. Norris, M. V. Orellana, D. A. Orsini, J. Paatero, P. O. G. Persson, Q. Gao, C. Rauschenberg, Z. Ristovski, J. Sedlar, M. D. Shupe, B. Sierau, A. Sirevaag, S. Sjogren, O. Stetzer, E. Swietlicki, M. Szczodrak, P. Vaattovaara, N. Wahlberg, M. Westberg, and C. R. Wheeler
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2823–2869, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2823-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2823-2014, 2014
M. D. Shupe, P. O. G. Persson, I. M. Brooks, M. Tjernström, J. Sedlar, T. Mauritsen, S. Sjogren, and C. Leck
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9379–9399, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9379-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9379-2013, 2013
M. Yang, R. Beale, T. Smyth, and B. Blomquist
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6165–6184, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6165-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6165-2013, 2013
S. J. Norris, I. M. Brooks, B. I. Moat, M. J. Yelland, G. de Leeuw, R. W. Pascal, and B. Brooks
Ocean Sci., 9, 133–145, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-133-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-133-2013, 2013
D. A. J. Sproson, I. M. Brooks, and S. J. Norris
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 323–335, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-323-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-323-2013, 2013
B. W. Blomquist, C. W. Fairall, B. J. Huebert, and S. T. Wilson
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 3069–3075, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-3069-2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-3069-2012, 2012
Related subject area
Approach: In situ Observations | Properties and processes: Air-sea fluxes | Depth range: Surface | Geographical range: Deep Seas: North Atlantic | Challenges: Oceans and climate
Ocean bubbles under high wind conditions – Part 1: Bubble distribution and development
Role of air–sea fluxes and ocean surface density in the production of deep waters in the eastern subpolar gyre of the North Atlantic
Helen Czerski, Ian M. Brooks, Steve Gunn, Robin Pascal, Adrian Matei, and Byron Blomquist
Ocean Sci., 18, 565–586, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-565-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-565-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The bubbles formed by breaking waves speed up the movement of gases like carbon dioxide and oxygen between the atmosphere and the ocean. Understanding where these gases go is an important part of understanding Earth's climate. In this paper we describe measurements of the bubbles close to the ocean surface during big storms in the North Atlantic. We observed small bubbles collecting in distinctive patterns which help us to understand the contribution they make to the ocean breathing.
Tillys Petit, M. Susan Lozier, Simon A. Josey, and Stuart A. Cunningham
Ocean Sci., 17, 1353–1365, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-1353-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-1353-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Recent work has highlighted the dominant role of the Irminger and Iceland basins in the production of North Atlantic Deep Water. From our analysis, we find that air–sea fluxes and the ocean surface density field are both key determinants of the buoyancy-driven transformation in the Iceland Basin. However, the spatial distribution of the subpolar mode water (SPMW) transformation is most sensitive to surface density changes as opposed to the direct influence of the air–sea fluxes.
Cited articles
Al-Lashi, R. S., Gunn, S. R., and Czerski, H.: Automated Processing of
Oceanic Bubble Images for Measuring Bubble Size Distributions underneath
Breaking Waves, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 33,
1701–1714, https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-15-0222.1, 2016.
Al-Lashi, R. S., Gunn, S. R., Webb, E. G., and Czerski, H.: A Novel
High-Resolution Optical Instrument for Imaging Oceanic Bubbles, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 43, 72–82, https://doi.org/10.1109/joe.2017.2660099, 2018.
Anguelova, M. D. and Huq, P.: Characteristics of bubble clouds at various
wind speeds, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 117, C03036,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jc007442, 2012.
Atamanchuk, D., Koelling, J., Send, U., and Wallace, D. W. R.: Rapid
transfer of oxygen to the deep ocean mediated by bubbles, Nat. Geosci.,
13, 232–237, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0532-2, 2020.
Blenkinsopp, C. E. and Chaplin, J. R.: Void fraction measurements in
breaking waves, P. Roy. Soc. A-Math. Phy., 463, 3151–3170, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2007.1901, 2007.
Blenkinsopp, C. E. and Chaplin, J. R.: Void fraction measurements and scale
effects in breaking waves in freshwater and seawater, Coast. Eng.,
58, 417–428, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2010.12.006, 2011.
Blomquist, B. W., Brumer, S. E., Fairall, C. W., Huebert, B. J., Zappa, C.
J., Brooks, I. M., Yang, M., Bariteau, L., Prytherch, J., Hare, J. E.,
Czerski, H., Matei, A., and Pascal, R. W.: Wind Speed and Sea State
Dependencies of Air-Sea Gas Transfer: Results From the High Wind Speed Gas
Exchange Study (HiWinGS), J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122,
8034–8062, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017jc013181, 2017.
Bowyer, P. A.: Video measurements of near-surface bubble spectra, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 106, 14179–14190, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jc000208, 2001.
Brooks, I.: Wave spectra and statistics measured in 1D and 2D in the North Atlantic, October–November 2013, NERC EDS British Oceanographic Data Centre NOC, [data set], https://doi.org/10.5285/c9ae04d6-32d2-73f1-e053-6c86abc0c833, 2021.
Callaghan, A. H., Deane, G. B., and Stokes, M. D.: Laboratory air-entraining
breaking waves: Imaging visible foam signatures to estimate energy
dissipation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 11320–11328,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl071226, 2016.
Callaghan, A. H., Deane, G. B., and Stokes, M. D.: On the imprint of
surfactant-driven stabilization of laboratory breaking wave foam with
comparison to oceanic whitecaps, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans,
122, 6110–6128, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017jc012809, 2017.
Chiba, D. and Baschek, B.: Effect of Langmuir cells on bubble dissolution
and air-sea gas exchange, J. Geophys. Res., 115, C10046,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jc006203, 2010.
Chua, G., Chitre, M., and Deane, G. B.: Long-Lived Bubbles and Their Impact
on Underwater Acoustic Communication, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng.,
46, 1008–1023, https://doi.org/10.1109/joe.2020.3028396, 2021.
Crawford, G. B. and Farmer, D. M.: On the spatial distribution of ocean
bubbles, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 8231–8243, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC092iC08p08231, 1987.
Czerski, H.: An Inversion of Acoustical Attenuation Measurements to Deduce
Bubble Populations, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 29,
1139–1148, https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-11-00170.1, 2012.
Czerski, H. and Blomquist, B. W.: HiWinGS expedition (North Atlantic, October–November 2013) 10 minute meteorological data, NERC EDS British Oceanographic Data Centre NOC [data set], https://doi.org/10.5285/dd2837f0-b721-7b13-e053-6c86abc0cee7, 2022.
Czerski, H., Twardowski, M., Zhang, X., and Vagle, S.: Resolving size
distributions of bubbles with radii less than 30 µm with optical and
acoustical methods, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 116, C00H11,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jc007177, 2011a.
Czerski, H., Vagle, S., Farmer, D. M., and Hall-Patch, N.: Improvements to
the methods used to measure bubble attenuation using an underwater
acoustical resonator, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 130, 3421–3430, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3569723,
2011b.
Czerski, H., Brooks, I., Gunn, S. R., Matei, A., and Al-Lashi, R.: Near-surface bubble size distributions and co-located upward-pointing sonar data collected in high wind conditions in the North Atlantic, October–November 2013, NERC EDS British Oceanographic Data Centre NOC, [data set], https://doi.org/10.5285/c972e316-2b93-1b4e-e053-6c86abc02285, 2021.
Czerski, H., Brooks, I. M., Gunn, S., Pascal, R., Matei, A., and Blomquist, B.: Ocean bubbles under high wind conditions – Part 1:
Bubble distribution and development, Ocean Sci., 18, 565–586, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-565-2022, 2022.
Dahl, P. H., Choi, J. W., Williams, N. J., and Graber, H. C.: Field
measurements and modeling of attenuation from near-surface bubbles for
frequencies 1–20 kHz, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 124, 163–169, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2963096,
2008.
de Leeuw, G. D. and Cohen, L. H.: Bubble Size Distributions on the North
Atlantic and North Sea, Gas Transf. Water Surf., 127, 271–277,
https://doi.org/10.1029/GM127p0271, 2002.
de Leeuw, G., Andreas, E. L., Anguelova, M. D., Fairall, C. W., Lewis, E.
R., O'Dowd, C., Schulz, M., and Schwartz, S. E.: Production flux of sea
spray aerosol, Rev. Geophys., 49, RG2001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010rg000349, 2011.
Deane, G. B.: The Performance of High-Frequency Doppler Sonars in Actively
Breaking Wave Crests, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 41, 1028–1034,
https://doi.org/10.1109/joe.2016.2521247, 2016.
Deane, G. B. and Stokes, D. M.: Scale dependence of bubble creation
mechanisms in breaking waves, Nature, 418, 839–844, 2002.
Deane, G. B., Preisig, J. C., and Lavery, A. C.: The Suspension of Large
Bubbles Near the Sea Surface by Turbulence and Their Role in Absorbing
Forward-Scattered Sound, IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 38, 632–641,
https://doi.org/10.1109/joe.2013.2257573, 2013.
Deane, G. B., Stokes, M. D., and Callaghan, A. H.: The Saturation of Fluid
Turbulence in Breaking Laboratory Waves and Implications for Whitecaps,
J. Phys. Ocean., 46, 975–992, https://doi.org/10.1175/jpo-d-14-0187.1,
2016.
Deike, L.: Mass Transfer at the Ocean–Atmosphere Interface: The Role of
Wave Breaking, Droplets, and Bubbles, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 54,
191–224, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-030121-014132, 2022.
Deike, L., Melville, W. K., and Popinet, S.: Air entrainment and bubble
statistics in breaking waves, J. Fluid Mech., 801, 91–129,
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.372, 2016.
Farmer, D. M. and Li, M.: Patterns of Bubble Clouds Organised by Langmuir
Circulation, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 25, 1426–1440, 1994.
Farmer, D. M., McNeil, C. L., and Johnson, B. D.: Evidence for the
importance of bubbles in increasing gas flux, Nature, 361, 620–623, 1993.
Fraga, B. and Stoesser, T.: Influence of bubble size, diffuser width, and
flow rate on the integral behavior of bubble plumes, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121, 3887–3904, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jc011381, 2016.
Garrett, C., Li, M., and Farmer, D. M.: The connection between bubble size
spectra and energy dissipation rates in the upper ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30, 2163–2171, 2000.
Gemmrich, J.: Bubble-induced turbulence suppression in Langmuir circulation,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L10604, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl051691, 2012.
Graham, A., Woolf, D. K., and Hall, A. J.: Aeration Due to Breaking Waves,
Part I: Bubble Populations, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 34, 989–1007,
2004.
Johnson, B. D. and Wangersky, P. J.: Microbubbles: Stabilization by
Monolayers of Adsorbed Particles, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 14641–14647, 1987.
Kolaini, A. R.: Sound radiation by various types of laboratory breaking
waves in fresh and salt water, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,
103, 300–308, 1997.
Lamarre, E. and Melville, W. K.: Air entrainment and dissipation in breaking
waves, Nature, 351, 469–472, 1991.
Leifer, I. and de Leeuw, G.: Bubbles generated from wind-steepened breaking
waves: 1. Bubble plume bubbles, J. Geophys. Res., 111, C06020,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jc002673, 2006.
Liang, J.-H., McWilliams, J. C., Sullivan, P. P., and Baschek, B.: Modeling
bubbles and dissolved gases in the ocean, J. Geophys. Res.,
116, C03015, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jc006579, 2011.
Liang, J.-H., McWilliams, J. C., Sullivan, P. P., and Baschek, B.: Large
eddy simulation of the bubbly ocean: New insights on subsurface bubble
distribution and bubble-mediated gas transfer, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 117, C04002, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jc007766, 2012.
Liang, J.-H., Emerson, S. R., D'Asaro, E. A., McNeil, C. L., Harcourt, R.
R., Sullivan, P. P., Yang, B., and Cronin, M. F.: On the role of sea-state
in bubble-mediated air-sea gas flux during a winter storm, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 2671–2685, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jc012408, 2017.
Lim, H.-J., Chang, K.-A., Huang, Z.-C., and Na, B.: Experimental study on
plunging breaking waves in deep water, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120, 2007–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jc010269, 2015.
Masuk, A. U. M., Salibindla, A. K. R., and Ni, R.: Simultaneous measurements
of deforming Hinze-scale bubbles with surrounding turbulence, J. Fluid Mech., 910, 1–24, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.933, 2021.
Medwin, H. and Breitz, N. D.: Ambient and Transient Bubble Spectral
Densities in Quiescent Seas and Under Spilling Breakers, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 12751–12759, 1989.
Norris, S. J., Brooks, I. M., Moat, B. I., Yelland, M. J., de Leeuw, G., Pascal, R. W., and Brooks, B.: Near-surface measurements of sea spray aerosol production over whitecaps in the open ocean, Ocean Sci., 9, 133–145, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-133-2013, 2013.
Norton, G. V., Novarini, J. C., and Keiffer, R. S.: Modeling the propagation
from a horizontally directed high-frequency source in shallow water in the
presence of bubble clouds and sea surface roughness, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 103, 3256–3267, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.423042, 1998.
Pascal, R., Yelland, M., Srokosz, M., Moat, B. I., Waugh, E., Comben, D.,
Coles, D. G. H., Chang Hsueh, P., and Leighton, T. G.: A Spar Buoy for
High-Frequency Wave Measurements and Detection of Wave Breaking in the Open
Ocean, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 28, 590–605,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jtecho764.1, 2011.
Poulichet, V. and Garbin, V.: Cooling Particle-Coated Bubbles:
Destabilization beyond Dissolution Arrest, Langmuir, 31, 12035–12042,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03480, 2015.
Randolph, K., Dierssen, H. M., Twardowski, M., Cifuentes-Lorenzen, A., and
Zappa, C. J.: Optical measurements of small deeply penetrating bubble
populations generated by breaking waves in the Southern Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119, 757–776, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jc009227, 2014.
Rivière, A., Mostert, W., Perrard, S., and Deike, L.: Sub-Hinze scale
bubble production in turbulent bubble break-up, J. Fluid Mech.,
917, A40, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2021.243, 2021.
Rojas, G. and Loewen, M. R.: Void fraction measurements beneath plunging and
spilling breaking waves, J. Geophys. Res., 115, C08001,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jc005614, 2010.
Sabbaghzadeh, B., Upstill-Goddard, R. C., Beale, R., Pereira, R., and
Nightingale, P. D.: The Atlantic Ocean surface microlayer from 50∘ N to 50∘ S is ubiquitously enriched in surfactants at wind speeds
up to 13 m s−1, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2852–2858,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl072988, 2017.
Slauenwhite, D. E. and Johnson, B. D.: Bubble shattering: Differences in
bubble formation in fresh and salt water, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 3265–3275, https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JC900064, 1999.
Stramski, D. and Tegowski, J.: Effects of intermettent entrainment of air
bubbles by breaking wind waves on ocean reflectance and underwater light
field, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 31345–31360, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000461, 2001.
Terrill, E. J., Melville, W. K., and Stramski, D.: Bubble entrainment by
breaking waves and their influence on optical scattering in the upper ocean,
J. Geophys. Res., 106, 213–231,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033<2013:BCALCO>2.0.CO;2,
2001.
Thorpe, S. A.: On the clouds of bubbles formed by breaking wind-waves in
deep water and their role in air-sea gas transfer, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. Lond., 304, 155–210, 1982.
Thorpe, S. A., Osborn, T. R., Farmer, D. M., and Vagle, S.: Bubble clouds
and Langmuir Circulation: Observations and Models, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 33, C12054, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005990, 2003.
Trevorrow, M. V.: Measurements of near-surface bubble plumes in the open
ocean with implications for high-frequency sonar performance, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 114, 2672–2684, https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1621008, 2003.
Vagle, S., McNeil, C., and Steiner, N.: Upper ocean bubble measurements from
the NE Pacific and estimates of their role in air-sea gas transfer of the
weakly soluble gases nitrogen and oxygen, J. Geophys. Res.,
115, C12054, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005990, 2010.
Vagle, S., Gemmrich, J., and Czerski, H.: Reduced upper ocean turbulence and
changes to bubble size distributions during large downward heat flux events,
J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 117, C00H16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007308,
2012.
van Vossen, R. and Ainslie, M. A.: The effect of wind-generated bubbles on
sea-surface backscattering at 940 Hz, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 130, 3413–3420,
https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3626125, 2011.
Wanninkhof, R.: Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the
ocean revisited, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 12, 351–362,
https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2014.12.351, 2014.
Woolf, D. K., Leifer, I. S., Nightingale, P. D., Rhee, T. S., Bowyer, P.,
Caulliez, G., de Leeuw, G., Larsen, S. E., Liddicoat, M., Baker, J., and
Andreae, M. O.: Modelling of bubble-mediated gas transfer: Fundamental
principles and a laboratory test, J. Mar. Syst., 66, 71–91,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2006.02.011, 2007.
Wurl, O., Wurl, E., Miller, L., Johnson, K., and Vagle, S.: Formation and global distribution of sea-surface microlayers, Biogeosciences, 8, 121–135, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-121-2011, 2011.
Zedel, L. and Farmer, D.: Organized structures in subsurface bubble clouds:
Langmuir circulation in the open ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 8889–8900,
https://doi.org/10.1029/91jc00189, 1991.
Short summary
The bubbles formed by breaking waves at the ocean surface are important because they are thought to speed up the movement of gases like carbon dioxide and oxygen between the atmosphere and ocean. We collected data on the bubbles in the top few metres of the ocean which were created by storms in the North Atlantic. The focus in this paper is the bubble sizes and their position in the water. We saw that there are very predictable patterns and set out what happens to bubbles after a wave breaks.
The bubbles formed by breaking waves at the ocean surface are important because they are thought...
