Articles | Volume 17, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-651-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-651-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
06 May 2021
Research article |
| 06 May 2021
| 06 May 2021
The mesoscale eddy field in the Lofoten Basin from high-resolution Lagrangian simulations
Johannes S. Dugstad
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research,
Bergen, Norway
Pål Erik Isachsen
Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
Ilker Fer
Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research,
Bergen, Norway
Related authors
Ilker Fer, Anthony Bosse, and Johannes Dugstad
Ocean Sci., 16, 685–701, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-685-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-685-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed 14-month-long observations from moored instruments to describe the average features and the variability of the Norwegian Atlantic Slope Current at the Lofoten Escarpment (13°E, 69°N). The slope current varies strongly with depth and in time. Pulses of strong current occur, lasting for 1 to 2 weeks, and extend as deep as 600 m. The average volume transport is 2 x 106 m3 s-1.
Kjersti Kalhagen, Ragnheid Skogseth, Till M. Baumann, Eva Falck, and Ilker Fer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3080, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-3080, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Atlantic Water (AW) is a key driver of change in the Barents Sea. We have studied an emerging pathway of AW into the Barents Sea through the Svalbard Archipelago. We found that the Atlantic sector near the study site has warmed in the recent two decades, that Atlantic-origin waters intermittently enter the Barents Sea through this pathway, and that the heat transport is driven by tides, wind events, and variations in the current system upstream.
Eivind Hugaas Kolås, Ilker Fer, and Till Martin Baumann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2864, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2864, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In the northwestern Barents Sea, we study the Barents Sea Polar Front formed by Atlantic Water meeting Polar Water. Analysis of ship and glider data between October 2020 and February 2021 show a density front with warm, salty water intruding beneath cold, fresh. Short-term variability is linked to tidal currents and mesoscale eddies, influencing front position, density slopes, and water mass transformation. Despite seasonal changes in the upper layers, the front remains stable below 100 m depth.
Håvard Espenes, Pål Erik Isachsen, and Ole Anders Nøst
Ocean Sci., 19, 1633–1648, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1633-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-1633-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We show that tidally generated eddies generated near the constriction of a channel can drive a strong and fluctuating flow field far downstream of the channel constriction itself. The velocity signal has been observed in other studies, but this is the first study linking it to a physical process. Eddies such as those we found are generated because of complex coastal geometry, suggesting that, for example, land-reclamation projects in channels may enhance current shear over a large area.
Ivan Kuznetsov, Benjamin Rabe, Alexey Androsov, Ying-Chih Fang, Mario Hoppmann, Alejandra Quintanilla-Zurita, Sven Harig, Sandra Tippenhauer, Kirstin Schulz, Volker Mohrholz, Ilker Fer, Vera Fofonova, and Markus Janout
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1353, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-1353, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Multidisciplinary Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate project has collected a rich data set in the central Arctic. This paper presents ocean model reanalyses of the part of the MOSAiC. More than 630,000 single data points and over a thousand profiles were used by the model. The results allow for analyzing the distribution of temperature, salinity, and velocity. The model provides insights into the eddies dynamics that would not be possible by analyzing the observations alone.
Eivind H. Kolås, Tore Mo-Bjørkelund, and Ilker Fer
Ocean Sci., 18, 389–400, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-389-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-18-389-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A turbulence instrument was installed on a light autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) and deployed in the Barents Sea in February 2021. We present the data quality and discuss limitations when measuring turbulence from the AUV. AUV vibrations contaminate the turbulence measurements, yet the measurements were sufficiently cleaned when the AUV operated in turbulent environments. In quiescent environments the noise from the AUV became relatively large, making the turbulence measurements unreliable.
Eli Børve, Pål Erik Isachsen, and Ole Anders Nøst
Ocean Sci., 17, 1753–1773, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-1753-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-1753-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Non-linear tidal dynamics can produce prominent time-mean transport in coastal regions where strong tidal currents interact with topography. We investigate tidal-induced transport using a tidally driven ocean model for Lofoten–Vesterålen in northern Norway and find that both tidal pumping and tidal rectification can play an important role for time-mean transport in the region. The study emphasizes the importance of non-linear tidal dynamics for time-mean transport in complex coastal regions.
Zoe Koenig, Eivind H. Kolås, and Ilker Fer
Ocean Sci., 17, 365–381, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-365-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-365-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The Arctic Ocean is a major sink for heat and salt for the global ocean. Ocean mixing contributes to this sink by mixing the Atlantic and Pacific waters with surrounding waters. We investigate the drivers of ocean mixing north of Svalbard based on observations collected during two research cruises in 2018 as part of the Nansen Legacy project. We found that wind and tidal forcing are the main drivers and that 1 % of the Atlantic Water heat loss can be attributed to vertical turbulent mixing.
Ilker Fer, Anthony Bosse, and Johannes Dugstad
Ocean Sci., 16, 685–701, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-685-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-685-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We analyzed 14-month-long observations from moored instruments to describe the average features and the variability of the Norwegian Atlantic Slope Current at the Lofoten Escarpment (13°E, 69°N). The slope current varies strongly with depth and in time. Pulses of strong current occur, lasting for 1 to 2 weeks, and extend as deep as 600 m. The average volume transport is 2 x 106 m3 s-1.
Erik M. Bruvik, Ilker Fer, Kjetil Våge, and Peter M. Haugan
Ocean Sci., 16, 291–305, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-291-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-291-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
A concept of small and slow ocean gliders or profiling floats with wings is explored. These robots or drones measure the ocean temperature and currents. Even if the speed is very slow, only 13 cm s1, it is possible to navigate the (simulated) ocean using a navigation method called Eulerian roaming. The slow speed and size conserve a lot of energy and enable scientific missions of years at sea.
Eivind Kolås and Ilker Fer
Ocean Sci., 14, 1603–1618, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-1603-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-1603-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
Measurements of ocean currents, stratification and microstructure collected northwest of Svalbard are used to characterize the evolution of the warm Atlantic current. The measured turbulent heat flux is too small to account for the observed cooling rate of the current. The estimated contribution of diffusion by eddies could be limited to one half of the observed heat loss. Mixing in the bottom boundary layer, driven by cross-slope flow of buoyant water, can be important.
Jenny E. Ullgren, Elin Darelius, and Ilker Fer
Ocean Sci., 12, 451–470, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-451-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-451-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
One-year long moored measurements of currents and hydrographic properties in the overflow region of the Faroe Bank Channel have provided a more accurate observational-based estimate of the volume transport, entrainment, and eddy diffusivities associated with the overflow plume. The data set resolves the temporal variability and covers the entire lateral and vertical extent of the plume.
E. Darelius, I. Fer, T. Rasmussen, C. Guo, and K. M. H. Larsen
Ocean Sci., 11, 855–871, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-855-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-855-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Quasi-regular eddies are known to be generated in the outflow of dense water through the Faroe Bank Channel. One year long mooring records from the plume region show that (1) the energy associated with the eddies varies by a factor of 10 throughout the year and (2) the frequency of the eddies shifts between 3 and 6 days and is related to the strength of the outflow. Similar variability is shown by a high-resolution regional model and the observations agree with theory on baroclinic instability.
I. Fer, M. Müller, and A. K. Peterson
Ocean Sci., 11, 287–304, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-287-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-287-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
Over the Yermak Plateau northwest of Svalbard there is substantial energy conversion from barotropic to internal tides. Internal tides are trapped along the topography. An approximate local conversion-to-dissipation balance is found over
shallows and also in the deep part of the sloping flanks. Dissipation of
tidal energy can be a significant contributor to turbulent mixing and cooling of the Atlantic layer in the Arctic Ocean.
T. Vihma, R. Pirazzini, I. Fer, I. A. Renfrew, J. Sedlar, M. Tjernström, C. Lüpkes, T. Nygård, D. Notz, J. Weiss, D. Marsan, B. Cheng, G. Birnbaum, S. Gerland, D. Chechin, and J. C. Gascard
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9403–9450, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9403-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9403-2014, 2014
M. Bakhoday Paskyabi and I. Fer
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 21, 713–733, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-21-713-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-21-713-2014, 2014
E. Støylen and I. Fer
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 21, 87–100, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-21-87-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-21-87-2014, 2014
Cited articles
Andersson, M., Orvik, K. A., Lacasce, J. H., Koszalka, I., and Mauritzen, C.: Variability of the Norwegian Atlantic Current and associated eddy field from surface drifters, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 116, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007078, 2011. a
Bashmachnikov, I. L., Belonenko, T. V., Kuibin, P., Volkov, D. L., and Foux, V.: Pattern of vertical velocity in the Lofoten vortex (the Norwegian Sea), Ocean Dynam., 68, 1711–1725, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-018-1213-1, 2018. a, b
Bosse, A., Fer, I., Lilly, J., and Søiland, H.: Dynamical controls on the longevity of a non-linear vortex: The case of the Lofoten Basin Eddy, Sci. Rep., 9, 13448, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49599-8, 2019. a
Broomé, S., Chafik, L., and Nilsson, J.: Mechanisms of decadal changes in sea surface height and heat content in the eastern Nordic Seas, Ocean Sci., 16, 715–728, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-715-2020, 2020. a
Dagestad, K.-F., Röhrs, J., Breivik, Ø., and Ådlandsvik, B.: OpenDrift v1.0: a generic framework for trajectory modelling, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1405–1420, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1405-2018, 2018. a
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C., van de Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., Mcnally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J. J., Park, B. K., Peubey, C., de Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J. N., and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 137, 553–597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011. a
Dugstad, J. S., Koszalka, I. M., Isachsen, P. E., Dagestad, K. F., and Fer, I.: Vertical Structure and Seasonal Variability of the Inflow to the Lofoten Basin Inferred From High-Resolution Lagrangian Simulations, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 124, 9384–9403, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015474, 2019b. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Fer, I., Bosse, A., and Dugstad, J.: Norwegian Atlantic Slope Current along the Lofoten Escarpment, Ocean Sci., 16, 685–701, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-685-2020, 2020. a, b, c
Gelderloos, R., Haine, T. W. N., Koszalka, I., and Magaldi, M.: Seasonal variability in warm-water inflow towards Kangerdlugssuaq Fjord, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 7, 1685–1699, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-16-0202.1, 2017. a
Haidvogel, D. B., Arango, H., Budgell, W. P., Cornuelle, B. D., Curchitser, E., Di Lorenzo, E., Fennel, K., Geyer, W. R., Hermann, A. J., Lanerolle, L., Levin, J., McWilliams, J. C., Miller, A. J., Moore, A. M., Powell, T. M., Shchepetkin, A. F., Sherwood, C. R., Signell, R. P., Warner, J. C., and Wilkin, J.: Ocean forecasting in terrain-following coordinates: Formulation and skill assessment of the Regional Ocean Modeling System, J. Comput. Phys., 227, 3595–3624, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.06.016, 2008. a
Isachsen, P. E.: Baroclinic instability and the mesoscale eddy field around the Lofoten Basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120, 2884–2903, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010448, 2015. a, b, c
Isachsen, P. E., Koszalka, I., and LaCasce, J. H.: Observed and modeled surface eddy heat fluxes in the eastern Nordic Seas, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 117, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC007935, 2012. a, b
Lilly, J. M. and Olhede, S. C.: Higher-Order Properties of Analytic Wavelets, IEEE T. Signal Proces., 57, 146–160, 2009. a
Lilly, J. M. and Olhede, S. C.: Wavelet ridge estimation of jointly modulated
multivariate oscillations, in: 2009 Conference Record of the Forty-Third
Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, Pacific Grove, CA, 1–4 November 2009, IEEE, 452–456,
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.2009.5469858, 2009. a, b, c
MacLachlan, C., Arribas, A., Peterson, K. A., Maidens, A., Fereday, D., Scaife, A. A., Gordon, M., Vellinga, M., Williams, A., Comer, R. E., Camp, J., Xavier, P., and Madec, G.: Global Seasonal forecast system version 5 (GloSea5): a high-resolution seasonal forecast system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 1072–1084, 2015. a
Mauritzen, C.: Production of dense overflow waters feeding the North Atlantic across the Greenland-Scotland Ridge. Part 1: Evidence for a revised circulation scheme, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. 1, 43, 769–806, https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(96)00037-4, 1996. a, b
Nilsen, J. E. Ø. and Falck, E.: Progress in Oceanography Variations of mixed layer properties in the Norwegian Sea for the period 1948–1999, Prog. Oceanogr., 70, 58–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2006.03.014, 2006. a
Orvik, K. A. and Niiler, P.: Major pathways of Atlantic water in the northern North Atlantic and Nordic Seas toward Arctic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 2–1, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015002, 2002. a
Penven, P., Echevin, V., Pasapera, J., Colas, F., and Tam, J.: Average circulation, seasonal cycle, and mesoscale dynamics of the Peru Current System: A modeling approach, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 110, C10021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC002945, 2005. a, b
Poulain, P.-M., Warn-Varnas, A., and Niiler, P. P.: Near-surface circulation of the Nordic seas as measured by Lagrangian drifters, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 18237, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC00506, 1996.
a
Raj, R., Chafik, L., Nilsen, J. E. ø., Eldevik, T., and Halo, I.: The Lofoten Vortex of the Nordic Seas, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 96, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2014.10.011, 2015. a, b
Richards, C. G. and Straneo, F.: Observations of Water Mass Transformation and Eddies in the Lofoten Basin of the Nordic Seas, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 45, 1735–1756, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-14-0238.1, 2015. a
Rossby, T., Ozhigin, V., Ivshin, V., and Bacon, S.: An isopycnal view of the Nordic Seas hydrography with focus on properties of the Lofoten Basin, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 56, 1955–1971, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2009.07.005, 2009a. a, b, c
Rossby, T., Prater, M. D., and Søiland, H.: Pathways of inflow and dispersion of warm waters in the Nordic Seas, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 114, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC005073, 2009b. a, b
Sandalyuk, N. V., Bosse, A., and Belonenko, T. V.: The 3-D Structure of Mesoscale Eddies in the Lofoten Basin of the Norwegian Sea: A Composite Analysis From Altimetry and In Situ Data, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 125, e2020JC016331, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016331, 2020. a
Segtnan, O. H., Furevik, T., and Jenkins, A. D.: Heat and freshwater budgets of the Nordic Seas computed from atmospheric reanalysis and ocean observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 116, 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC006939, 2011. a
Shchepetkin, A. F. and McWilliams, J. C.: Correction and commentary for “Ocean forecasting in terrain-following coordinates: Formulation and skill assessment of the regional ocean modeling system” by Haidvogel et al., J. Comp. Phys. 227, pp. 3595–3624, J. Comput. Phys., 228, 8985–9000, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2009.09.002, 2009. a
Søiland, H. and Rossby, T.: On the structure of the Lofoten Basin Eddy, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118, 4201–4212, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20301, 2013. a, b, c, d
Trodahl, M. and Isachsen, P. E.: Topographic Influence on Baroclinic Instability and the Mesoscale Eddy Field in the Northern North Atlantic Ocean and the Nordic Seas, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 48, 2593–2607, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0220.1, 2018. a, b, c, d
Trodahl, M., Isachsen, P. E., Lilly, J. M., Nilsson, J., and Kristensen, N. M.: The Regeneration of the Lofoten Vortex through Vertical Alignment, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 50, 2689–2711, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-20-0029.1, 2020. a
Umlauf, L. and Burchard, H.: A generic length-scale equation for geophysical turbulence models, J. Mar. Res., 61, 235–265, 2003. a
Volkov, D. L., Belonenko, T. V., and Foux, V. R.: Puzzling over the dynamics of the Lofoten Basin – a sub-Arctic hot spot of ocean variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 738–743, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50126, 2013. a, b
Volkov, D. L., Kubryakov, A. A., and Lumpkin, R.: Formation and variability of the Lofoten Basin vortex in a high-resolution ocean model, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 105, 142–157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2015.09.001, 2015. a, b, c, d
Wagner, P., Rühs, S., Schwarzkopf, F. U., Koszalka, I., and Biastoch, A.: Can Lagrangian tracking simulate tracer spreading in a high-resolution Ocean General Circulation Model?, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 49, 1141–1157, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-18-0152.1, 2019.
a
Warner, J. C., Sherwood, C. R., Arango, H. G., and Signell, R. P.: Performance of four turbulence closure models implemented using a generic length scale method, Ocean Model., 8, 81–113, 2005. a
Short summary
We quantify the mesoscale eddy field in the Lofoten Basin using Lagrangian model trajectories and aim to estimate the relative importance of eddies compared to the ambient flow in transporting warm Atlantic Water to the Lofoten Basin as well as modifying it. Water properties are largely changed in eddies compared to the ambient flow. However, only a relatively small fraction of eddies is detected in the basin. The ambient flow therefore dominates the heat transport to the Lofoten Basin.
We quantify the mesoscale eddy field in the Lofoten Basin using Lagrangian model trajectories...
