39 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Zooplankton size composition and production just after drastic ice coverage changes in the northern Bering Sea assessed via ZooScan S. Kumagai et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1233492
2. Plankton productivity of the Benguela Current Large Marine Ecosystem (BCLME) H. Verheye et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.07.011
3. Spatial variability and size structure of particles and plankton in the Fram Strait E. Trudnowska et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2018.09.005
4. Water column distribution of zooplanktonic size classes derived from in-situ plankton profilers: Potential use to contextualize contaminant loads in plankton B. Espinasse et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115573
5. Comparing biological traits of anchovy and sardine in the Bay of Biscay: A modelling approach with the Dynamic Energy Budget P. Gatti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.12.018
6. Surface zooplankton size and taxonomic composition in Bowdoin Fjord, north-western Greenland: A comparison of ZooScan, OPC and microscopic analyses A. Naito et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2019.01.001
7. The PELGAS survey: Ship-based integrated monitoring of the Bay of Biscay pelagic ecosystem M. Doray et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2017.09.015
8. The spring mesozooplankton variability and its relationship with hydrobiological structure over year-to-year changes (2003–2013) in the southern Bay of Biscay (Northeast Atlantic) A. Dessier et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2018.04.011
9. Zooplankton abundance, biovolume and size spectra at western boundary currents in the subtropical North Pacific during winter 2012 L. Dai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2015.11.004
10. Comparative analysis of mesozooplankton size fraction structure in bivalve aquaculture embayments in Atlantic and Pacific Canadian coastal regions R. Cordero et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100562
11. Trophic niche characterization of zooplankton and planktivorous fish: a comparative approach using stable isotopes in bulk and amino acid samples N. Mondéjar et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1718402
12. Ecosystem spatial structure revealed by integrated survey data P. Petitgas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2017.09.012
13. Frontal eddies provide an oceanographic triad for favorable larval fish habitat I. Suthers et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.12326
14. Mesozooplankton community distribution on the Agulhas Bank in autumn: Size structure and production M. Noyon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2021.105015
15. Estimating zooplankton vertical distribution from combined LOPC and ZooScan observations on the Brazilian Coast C. Marcolin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-015-2753-2
16. Seasonal and Interannual Variations (2019–2023) in the Zooplankton Community and Its Size Composition in Funka Bay, Southwestern Hokkaido H. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/oceans6030049
17. Seasonal changes in taxonomic, size composition, and Normalised Biomass Size Spectra (NBSS) of mesozooplankton communities in the Funka Bay, southwestern Hokkaido: Insights from ZooScan analysis T. Teraoka et al. https://doi.org/10.3800/pbr.17.369
18. Modeling What We Sample and Sampling What We Model: Challenges for Zooplankton Model Assessment J. Everett et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00077
19. Influence of ocean acidification on plankton community structure during a winter-to-summer succession: An imaging approach indicates that copepods can benefit from elevated CO2 via indirect food web effects J. Taucher et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169737
20. Spatial, seasonal, and climatic variability in mesozooplankton size spectra along a coastal-to-open ocean transect in the subarctic Northeast Pacific L. Kwong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2021.102728
21. Multiple island effects shape oceanographic processes and zooplankton size spectra off an oceanic archipelago in the Tropical Atlantic S. Lira et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2023.103942
22. Seasonal variability of zooplankton size spectra at Mombetsu Harbour in the southern Okhotsk Sea during 2011: An analysis using an optical plankton counter H. Hikichi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2018.03.011
23. Modeled larval fish prey fields and growth rates help predict recruitment success of cod and anchovy in the North Sea K. Huebert et al. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12615
24. Vertically Resolved Pelagic Particle Biomass and Size Structure Across a Continental Shelf Under the Influence of a Western Boundary Current H. Schilling et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018689
25. Contrasting structural patterns of the mesozooplankton community result from the development of a frontal system in San José Gulf, Patagonia R. Hernández-Moresino et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2017.05.012
26. Conditions for assessing zooplankton abundance with LOPC in coastal waters B. Espinasse et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2017.10.012
27. Temporal fluctuations in zooplankton size, abundance, and taxonomic composition since 1995 in the North Western Mediterranean Sea G. Feuilloley et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab190
28. Benthic food resources and the condition of bentho-demersal fish: spatial trends and relationships in the northern shelf of the Bay of Biscay T. Outrequin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2025.109593
29. Seasonal variation of zooplankton community structure and trophic position in the Celtic Sea: A stable isotope and biovolume spectrum approach S. Giering et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2018.03.012
30. Significant shifts in coastal zooplankton populations through the 2015/16 Tasman Sea marine heatwave R. Evans et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106538
31. WITHDRAWN: Structural patterns of the mesozooplankton community during the frontal system development in a semi-enclosed gulf of Argentine Patagonia R. Hernández-Moresino et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2017.06.042
32. Metazoan zooplankton in the Bay of Biscay: a 16-year record of individual sizes and abundances obtained using the ZooScan and ZooCAM imaging systems N. Grandremy et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1265-2024
33. Hydrology and small pelagic fish drive the spatio–temporal dynamics of springtime zooplankton assemblages over the Bay of Biscay continental shelf N. Grandremy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102949
34. Mesoscale assemblages of fish and megainvertebrates as evidence of benthiscapes on continental shelves T. Outrequin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2025.104088
35. Zooplankton size spectra and production assessed by two different nets in the subarctic Northeast Pacific L. Kwong & E. Pakhomov https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbab039
36. High frequency mesozooplankton monitoring: Can imaging systems and automated sample analysis help us describe and interpret changes in zooplankton community composition and size structure — An example from a coastal site J. Romagnan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.03.013
37. Decadal stability in top predator habitat preferences in the Bay of Biscay C. Lambert et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2018.03.007
38. Size Spectra Modeling of Mesozooplankton over a Tropical Continental Shelf C. de Souza et al. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-19-00102.1
39. Size-niche specific processes between mero- and holoplankton stabilize the continuum in size spectra of tropical estuarine and marine ecosystems D. Schwamborn et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2025.104152