Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2017-49
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-2017-49
09 Aug 2017
 | 09 Aug 2017
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Wave energy dissipation in the mangrove vegetation off Mumbai, India

Samiksha S. Volvaiker, Ponnumony Vethamony, Prasad K. Bhaskaran, Premanand Pednekar, MHamsa Jishad, and Arthur James

Abstract. Coastal regions of India are prone to sea level rise, cyclones, storm surges and human induced activities, resulting in flood, erosion, and inundation. The primary aim of the study is to estimate wave attenuation by mangrove vegetation using SWAN model in standalone mode, as well as SWAN nested with WW3 model for the Mumbai coastal region. To substantiate the model results, wave measurements were carried out during 5–8 August 2015 at 3 locations in a transect normal to the coast using surface mounted pressure level sensors under spring tide conditions. The measured data presents wave height attenuation of the order of 52 %. The study shows a linear relationship between wave height attenuation and gradual changes in water level in the nearshore region, in phase with the tides. Model set-up and sensitivity analyses were conducted to understand the model performance to vegetation parameters. It was observed that wave attenuation increased with an increase in drag coefficient (Cd), vegetation density, and stem diameter. For a typical set-up for Mumbai coastal region having vegetation density of 0.175 per m2, stem diameter of 0.3 m and drag coefficient varying from 0.4 to 1.5, the model reproduced attenuation, ranging from 49 to 55 %, which matches well with the measured data. Spectral analysis performed for the cases with and without vegetation very clearly portrays energy dissipation in the vegetation area as well as spectral changes. This study has the potential of improving the quality of wave prediction in vegetation areas, especially during monsoon season and extreme weather events.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Samiksha S. Volvaiker, Ponnumony Vethamony, Prasad K. Bhaskaran, Premanand Pednekar, MHamsa Jishad, and Arthur James

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Samiksha S. Volvaiker, Ponnumony Vethamony, Prasad K. Bhaskaran, Premanand Pednekar, MHamsa Jishad, and Arthur James
Samiksha S. Volvaiker, Ponnumony Vethamony, Prasad K. Bhaskaran, Premanand Pednekar, MHamsa Jishad, and Arthur James

Viewed

Total article views: 1,463 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
827 540 96 1,463 92 105
  • HTML: 827
  • PDF: 540
  • XML: 96
  • Total: 1,463
  • BibTeX: 92
  • EndNote: 105
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Aug 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Aug 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,363 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,356 with geography defined and 7 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 29 Dec 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.