the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Evaluation of Peaks-Over-Threshold Method
Abstract. Two extreme wave analysis models, namely Peaks-Over-Threshold (POT) and Generalized Pareto Distribution (GPD), were developed in order to improve the POT model and highlight merits and limitations of the two models. Studies have shown that the POT model was not equipped with a suitable approach to determine a true threshold value. This paper proposed an approach to specify the most suitable threshold value for the POT model, which is called Hybrid method. In addition, until now the MIR (minimum ratio of residual correlation coefficient) criterion has been used as a goodness-of-fit method in the POT model. However, the examinations on the method represented that MIR is not always a stable approach in determining true distribution function. This paper proposed an alternative approach instead of the MIR criterion method, it is called Norm of Residuals, and its credibility was examined by the Chi-Square test. The results drawn from this study also demonstrated that the Hybrid method completely matched with the POT model, and the threshold obtained by this method is credible, moreover, the Norm of Residuals method is completely stable in determining the best fitting distribution for the POT model.
- Preprint
(10677 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
-
RC1: 'comments on Evaluation of Peaks-Over-Threshold Method', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Aug 2016
- AC1: 'Response to the comments', Soheil Saeed Far, 05 Aug 2016
-
RC2: 'Evaluation of Peaks-Over-Threshold Method by Soheil Saeed Far and Ahmad Khairi Abd. Wahab', Anonymous Referee #2, 15 Aug 2016
- AC2: 'Response to the comments', Soheil Saeed Far, 21 Aug 2016
-
EC1: 'Decission', Andreas Sterl, 31 Aug 2016
- SC1: 'Response to the Topic Editor, Dr. Sterl', Soheil Saeed Far, 01 Sep 2016
-
RC1: 'comments on Evaluation of Peaks-Over-Threshold Method', Anonymous Referee #1, 02 Aug 2016
- AC1: 'Response to the comments', Soheil Saeed Far, 05 Aug 2016
-
RC2: 'Evaluation of Peaks-Over-Threshold Method by Soheil Saeed Far and Ahmad Khairi Abd. Wahab', Anonymous Referee #2, 15 Aug 2016
- AC2: 'Response to the comments', Soheil Saeed Far, 21 Aug 2016
-
EC1: 'Decission', Andreas Sterl, 31 Aug 2016
- SC1: 'Response to the Topic Editor, Dr. Sterl', Soheil Saeed Far, 01 Sep 2016
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,394 | 3,076 | 123 | 4,593 | 134 | 151 |
- HTML: 1,394
- PDF: 3,076
- XML: 123
- Total: 4,593
- BibTeX: 134
- EndNote: 151
Cited
5 citations as recorded by crossref.
- How extreme was the October 2015 flood in the Carolinas? An assessment of flood frequency analysis and distribution tails R. Phillips et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.035
- An integrated 1D–2D hydraulic modelling approach to assess the sensitivity of a coastal region to compound flooding hazard under climate change U. Pasquier et al. 10.1007/s11069-018-3462-1
- Probability Analysis of Crane Load and Load Combination Actions J. Yao et al. 10.1155/2018/6527307
- A peak-over-threshold approach for the numerical modeling of 26 December 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami at the Kalpakkam coast, Tamil Nadu, India D. Herrick et al. 10.1080/09715010.2018.1498752
- Performance of rainfall–runoff models in reproducing hydrological extremes: a case of the River Malaba sub-catchment A. Mubialiwo et al. 10.1007/s42452-021-04514-7