Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/osd-10-2461-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/osd-10-2461-2013

  20 Dec 2013

20 Dec 2013

Review status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Reconciling the north–south density difference scaling for the Meridional Overturning Circulation strength with geostrophy

A. A. Cimatoribus1,*, S. Drijfhout1,2, and H. A. Dijkstra3 A. A. Cimatoribus et al.
  • 1Global Climate Division, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, the Netherlands
  • 2National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK
  • 3Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • *now at: Department of Physical Oceanography, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Den Burg, the Netherlands

Abstract. Since the formulation of the Stommel two-box model for the meridional overturning circulation (MOC), various theoretical and conceptual models for the MOC emerged based on scaling the MOC strength with the north south density difference. At the same time the MOC should obey geostrophic balance with an east-west density difference. Scaling with the north south density gradient seems to violate the common assumption of geostrophic balance for the large-scale circulation, which implies that the pressure gradient is orthogonal to the flow. In this brief report, we report on the results of a series of numerical simulations in an idealized ocean basin (with a zonally periodic channel at its southern end). The simulations performed with different surface forcing conditions indicate that the meridional and zonal density gradients, important for the MOC strength, are in fact related to each other through the stratification located at the northern end of the periodic channel. The results suggest that the water properties at the northern end of the periodic channel play a crucial role in setting the MOC strength, possibly explaining the sensitivity of climate models to the conditions in this area.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

A. A. Cimatoribus et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

A. A. Cimatoribus et al.

A. A. Cimatoribus et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,115 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
726 341 48 1,115 79 69
  • HTML: 726
  • PDF: 341
  • XML: 48
  • Total: 1,115
  • BibTeX: 79
  • EndNote: 69
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Dec 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Dec 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 23 Oct 2021
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.