Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/osd-9-499-2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/osd-9-499-2012
09 Feb 2012
 | 09 Feb 2012
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal OS but the revision was not accepted.

NEMO on the shelf: assessment of the Iberia–Biscay–Ireland configuration

C. Maraldi, J. Chanut, B. Levier, G. Reffray, N. Ayoub, P. De Mey, F. Lyard, S. Cailleau, M. Drévillon, E. A. Fanjul, M. G. Sotillo, P. Marsaleix, and the Mercator Team

Abstract. A high resolution simulation covering the Iberia–Biscay–Ireland (IBI) region is set-up over July 2007–February 2009. The NEMO model is used with a 1/36° horizontal resolution on 50 z-levels in the vertical. It is forced by the astronomical potential and atmospheric forcing fields which consist of 3-hourly ECMWF analyses. Initial hydrographic conditions are derived from an Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea analyse at 1/12° from Mercator Ocean (PSY2V3 model). At the open boundaries, IBI is forced with PSY2V3 temperature and salinity fields. It is also forced with tidal currents and elevations and inverse barometer elevations. In this study we evaluate the realism of the simulation through comparisons with an extensive observational dataset including climatology, temperature and salinity profiles, satellite SST data, sea surface buoys, tide gauges, altimeter data and HF radar data. A specific interest is given to the procedure used for the validation. General aspects of the simulation and its quality are analysed and particular attention is given to the validation of high frequency processes including the diurnal cycle, barotropic and internal tides, and surges. Finally, we focus on specific aspects of the circulation on the European sea shelves and give a qualitative assessment by studying tidal fronts, and specially the Ushant front, and the winter extension of the Iberian Poleward Current along the Northern Spanish coast during winter 2007–2008.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
C. Maraldi, J. Chanut, B. Levier, G. Reffray, N. Ayoub, P. De Mey, F. Lyard, S. Cailleau, M. Drévillon, E. A. Fanjul, M. G. Sotillo, P. Marsaleix, and the Mercator Team
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
C. Maraldi, J. Chanut, B. Levier, G. Reffray, N. Ayoub, P. De Mey, F. Lyard, S. Cailleau, M. Drévillon, E. A. Fanjul, M. G. Sotillo, P. Marsaleix, and the Mercator Team
C. Maraldi, J. Chanut, B. Levier, G. Reffray, N. Ayoub, P. De Mey, F. Lyard, S. Cailleau, M. Drévillon, E. A. Fanjul, M. G. Sotillo, P. Marsaleix, and the Mercator Team

Viewed

Total article views: 1,768 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,044 621 103 1,768 99 115
  • HTML: 1,044
  • PDF: 621
  • XML: 103
  • Total: 1,768
  • BibTeX: 99
  • EndNote: 115
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Latest update: 18 Nov 2024