Articles | Volume 8, issue 4
Ocean Sci., 8, 525–543, 2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-525-2012
Ocean Sci., 8, 525–543, 2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-525-2012

Research article 19 Jul 2012

Research article | 19 Jul 2012

Propagation and dissipation of internal tides in the Oslofjord

A. Staalstrøm1,2, E. Aas2, and B. Liljebladh3 A. Staalstrøm et al.
  • 1Section for Oceanography, Remote Sensing and Marine Modelling, Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, Norway
  • 2Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 3Department of Earth Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Abstract. Observations of velocity, pressure, temperature and salinity in the inner Oslofjord have been analysed to provide new information about the relationships between internal tides generated by tidal currents across the Drøbak Sill and dissipation and diffusivity in the fjord.

The most energetic vertical displacement of density surfaces inside the sill is associated with the first internal mode that has maximum amplitude around sill depth. The amplitude of the vertical displacement around sill depth correlates with the amplitude of the surface elevation, and, at a distance of 1 km inside the sill, the ratio between the amplitudes is 38, decreasing to 11 at a distance of 10 km. The greatest vertical displacements inside the sill, however, are found at 40 m depth. These latter internal waves are not associated with a first-mode internal tide, but are rather associated with higher internal modes controlled by stratification.

The energy flux of the internal wave propagating from the Drøbak Sill into the inner fjord on the east side of the Håøya Island is estimated to vary in the range 155–430 kW. This is the same order of magnitude as the estimated barotropic energy loss over the Drøbak Sill (250 kW), but only 4–10% of the total barotropic flux. Approximately 40–70% of the internal energy flux is lost within a distance of 10 km from the sill. The mean diffusivity below 90 m depth in this area (~20 cm2 s−1) is more than four times higher than in the rest of the fjord (~5 cm2 s−1 or less).

Download