References

OSD

Ocean Science Discussions

OSD

Ocean Sci. Discuss.

1812-0822

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/osd-4-571-2007

Altimetric sampling and mapping procedures induce spatial and temporal aliasing of the signal – characteristics of these aliasing effects in the Mediterranean Sea

Pujol

M.-I.

¹ Larnicol

² Dibarboure

² Briol

INGV, Via Donato Creti 12, 40128 Bologna, Italy

CLS Space Oceanography Division, 8–10 Rue Hermès, 31526 Ramonville St. Agne, France

17 07 2007

4 4 571 622

2007

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Generic License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/

This article is available from https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/4/571/2007/osd-4-571-2007.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/4/571/2007/osd-4-571-2007.pdf

This study deals with spatial and temporal aliasing of the sea surface signal and its restitution with altimetric maps of Sea Level Anomalies (SLA) in the Mediterranean Sea. Spatial and temporal altimetry sampling, combined with a mapping process, are unable to restore high-frequency (HF) surface variability. In the Mediterranean Sea, it has been shown that signals whose intervals are less than 30–40 days are largely underestimated, and the residual HF restitution signal contains characteristic errors which make it possible to identify the spatial and temporal sampling of each satellite. The origin of these errors is relatively complex. Three main effects are involved: the sampling of the HF long-wavelength (LW) signal, the correction of this signal's aliasing and the mapping procedure. – The sampling depends on the characteristics of the satellites considered, but generally induces inter-track bias that needs to be corrected before the mapping procedure is applied. – Correcting the aliasing of the HF LW signal, carried out using a barotropic model output and/or an empirical method, is not perfect. In fact, the baroclinic part of the HF LW signal is neglected and the numerical model's capabilities are limited by the spatial resolution of the model and the forcing. The empirical method cannot precisely control the corrected signal. – The mapping process, which is optimised to improve restitution of mesoscale activity, does not propagate the LW signal far from the satellite tracks. Even though these residual errors are very low with respect to the total signal, their signature may be visible on maps of SLAs. However, these errors can be corrected by more careful consideration of their characteristics in terms of spatial distribution induced by altimetric along-track sampling. They can also be attenuated by increasing the altimetric spatial coverage through the merging of different satellites. Ultimately, the HF signal, which is missing in maps of SLA, can be completed using a numerical model in order to estimate the total surface signal. The barotropic HF (<30 days) component accounts for nearly 10% of the total variability. Locally, it contributes nearly 25% of the total variance.

References 1

Carrère, L.: Etude et modelisation de la réponse haute fréquence de l'océan global aux forçages météorologiques, these de l'université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III, 2003.

Carrère, L. and Lyard, F.: Modeling the barotropic response of the global ocean to atmospheric wind and pressure forcing – comparison with observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(6), 1275, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016473, 2003.

Ducet, N., Le Traon, P.-Y., and Reverdun, G.: Global high-resolution mapping of the ocean circulation from TOPEX/Poseidon and ERS-1 and -2, J. Geophys. Res., 105(C8), 19 477–19 498, 2000.

ECMWF: European Centre for Medium-Range Forecasts Model, ECMWF research manual, 1991.

Fukumori, I., Raghunath, R., and Fu, L.-L.: Nature of large-scale sea level variability in relation to atmospheric forcing: A modeling study, J. Geophys. Res., 103(C3), 5493–5512, 1998.

Fukumori, I., Menemenlis, D., and Lee, T.: A Near-Uniform Basin Wide Sea Level Fluctuation of the Mediterranean Sea, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 37(2), 338–358, 2007.

Larnicol, G., Ayoub, N., and Le Traon, P.-Y.: Major changes in the Mediterranean Sea level variabilità from 7 years of Topex/Poseidon and ERS-1/2 data., J. Mar. Syst., 33–34, 63–89, 2002.

Le Traon, P.-Y. and Gauzelin, P.: Response of the Mediterranean mean sea level to atmospheric pressure forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 102(C1), 973–984, 1997.

Le Traon, P.-Y. and Ogor, F.: ERS-1/2 orbit improvement using TOPEX/POSEIDON: the 2 cm challenge, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 8045–8057, 1998.

Le Traon, P.-Y., Nadal, F., and Ducet, N.: An improved mapping method of multisatellite altimeter data, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 15, 522–534, 1998.

Lyard, F. and Roblou, L.: Prévision de produit combine du niveau de la mer en Méditerranée – comparaisons avec des observations, La letter trimestrielle de MERCATOR, 10, 17–27, 2003.

Mangiarotti, S. and Lyard, F.: Surface Pressure and Wind Stress Effect on Sea Level Change Estimations From TOPEX-POSEIDON Satellite Altimetry in the Mediterranean Sea, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., accepted, 2007.

Pujol, M.-I. and Larnicol, G.: Mediterranean Sea eddy kinetic energy variability from 11 years of altimetric data, J. Mar. Syst., 58, 121–142, 2005.