<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \hack{\sloppy}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">OSD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Ocean Science Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">OSD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ocean Sci. Discuss.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1812-0822</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/osd-12-2683-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>The relationship between Arabian Sea upwelling and Indian
monsoon revisited</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{The relationship between Arabian Sea upwelling and Indian
monsoon revisited}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{X.~Yi et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yi</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name>
          <email>xing.yi@hzg.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0380-6910</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hünicke</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tim</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6336-5897</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zorita</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7264-5743</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Institute of Coastal Research,
Max-Planck-Str.1, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>  21502 Geesthacht, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">X. Yi (xing.yi@hzg.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>6</day><month>November</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>2683</fpage><lpage>2704</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>10</day><month>September</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day><month>October</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/2683/2015/osd-12-2683-2015.html">This article is available from https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/2683/2015/osd-12-2683-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/2683/2015/osd-12-2683-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/2683/2015/osd-12-2683-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Studies based on upwelling indices (sediment records, sea-surface
temperature and wind) suggest that upwelling along the western coast
of Arabian Sea is strongly affected by the Indian summer monsoon
(ISM). In order to examine this relationship directly, we employ the
vertical water mass transport produced by the eddy-resolving global
ocean simulation STORM driven by meteorological reanalysis over the
last 61 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. With its very high spatial resolution
(10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), STORM allows us to identify characteristics of the
upwelling system. We analyze the co-variability between upwelling
and meteorological and oceanic variables from 1950 to 2010. The
analyses reveal high interannual correlations between coastal
upwelling and along-shore wind-stress (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as well as with
sea-surface temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.83).  However, the correlation
between the upwelling and the ISM is small and other factors might
contribute to the upwelling variability. In addition, no long-term
trend is detected in our modeled upwelling time series.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Coastal upwelling is important as the upwelled nutrient-rich water
supports coastal fisheries. It is hypothesized that coastal upwelling
will strengthen in the major upwelling regions under the influence of
global warming (Bakun, 1990). In support of this hypothesis, Narayan
et al. (2010) detected positive trends in upwelling intensity in the
four major eastern boundary upwelling systems (EBUSs) and more
recently Wang et al. (2015) projects the intensification of upwelling
in three of the four EBUSs under a strong increase of anthropogenic
greenhouse gas emissions. Beside the EBUSs, the Arabian Sea also has
attracted numerous scientific studies due to its connection to the
Asian Monsoon. The wind related to the Indian monsoon reverses its
direction semiannually. During summer, the southwest monsoon causes
upwelling favorable wind that induces upwelling along the west coast
of the Arabian Sea (Findlater, 1969). The Arabian Sea upwelling and
its relationship with the Indian summer monsoon (ISM) have been
broadly investigated. Studies based on the abundance of the
foraminifera <italic>G.  bulloides</italic> from the sediment records intimately
connect the Arabian Sea upwelling and the ISM (Anderson et al., 2002;
Curry et al., 1992; Kroon et al., 1991; Prell and Vancampo,
1986). More recently, Godad et al. (2011) reconstructed the
sea-surface temperature (SST) from planktonic foraminifera and
suggested that the peak upwelling season was shifting over the last 22
ka in the western Arabian Sea. A comparison between the foraminifera
measured from sediment traps in the western and the eastern Arabian
Sea showed that the measurements were significantly correlated to the
monsoon but not to the SST and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Naik et al., 2013). SST is
suggested to be the most reliable indicator of the coastal upwelling
in the Arabian Sea (Prell and Curry, 1981) and it is applied as
a traditional upwelling index by various studies. Emeis et al. (1995)
used SST reconstructed from sediment records and Manghnani
et al. (1998) processed SST from remote sensing data, while Izumo
et al. (2008) combined modeled, in situ and satellite SST data, to
derive an upwelling index. In addition, other previous studies have
used along-shore upwelling favorable wind-stress as another
traditional upwelling index, as originally described by Bakun (1973).</p>
      <p>These upwelling indices have been profusely used but they are not
a direct measure of upwelling velocities. It is difficult to monitor
vertical velocities over a long time span and therefore other studies
have resorted to ocean simulations to study the variability of
upwelling analyzing directly the vertical velocity. Recently, Jacox
et al. (2014) analyzed the vertical velocity from a four-dimensional
regional ocean model to investigate the upwelling in the California
current system. In the Arabian Sea, Shi et al. (2000) estimated the
upwelling velocity off Oman from 1993 to 1995 through the combination
of hydrographic and altimetry data. Anderson et al. (1992) employed
a simple one-dimensional model to calculate the vertical upwelling
velocity off Oman. Rao et al. (2008) used a three-dimensional model to
compute the vertical velocity along the west coast of India. Studies
applying ocean general circulation models also gave hints on the
interaction of upwelling and SST (Ma et al., 2014) and the impact of
Kelvin waves at the eastern boundary on the western Arabian Sea
upwelling region (Tozuka et al., 2014). However, a study focused on
the western Arabian Sea based on long-term four dimensional upwelling
data is not yet available. In this study we fill this gap by employing
the direct upwelling velocity data modeled from a high-resolution
global ocean simulation over the period 1950 to 2010. We compare the
upwelling velocity with traditional upwelling indices (SST and
wind-stress) and examine the relationship between the upwelling and
the ISM as well as other potential factors that might affect the
upwelling. An unexpected finding is that the correlations between the
simulated upwelling and three different Monsoon indices are low and
insignificant, which indicates that over the past 61 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the
impact of the ISM on the coastal upwelling in the western Arabian Sea
could have been weaker than thought previously and that other
large-scale atmospheric forcing is a more efficient drive of upwelling
in this region.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Model and data</title>
      <p>The German consortium project STORM aimed at developing
high-resolution global climate change simulations. The ocean model
simulation used in this study is hereinafter referred to as the STORM
simulation, is based on the Max-Planck Institute Ocean Model
(MPI-OM). It is forced by the 6 hourly National Centers for
Environmental Prediction (NCEP)/National Center for Atmospheric
Research (NCAR) reanalysis (Kalnay et al., 1996) for the period from
1948 to 2010. The model original bipolar grid is replaced by
a tripolar grid to obtain an isotropic horizontal
resolution. Comprising <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3602</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>2394</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal grid points in
total, the STORM simulation has a horizontal resolution of
0.1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> around the equator and higher towards the poles. The
model has 80 levels, separated in the first 200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by 10 to
15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (von Storch et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>Upwelling velocity is derived from the vertical water mass transport
in the STORM simulation output. The high spatial resolution of the
STORM simulation contributes to capture the upwelling variability on
small scales. We compare the upwelling velocity derived from the STORM
simulation with SST and wind-stress derived from different
sources. SST data are obtained from the Advanced Very High Resolution
Radiometer (AVHRR) Pathfinder Version 5.0 (Casey et al., 2010). Wind
data are provided by the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis and the Cross-Calibrated
Multi-Platform (CCMP) project (Atlas et al., 2011). The along-shore
upwelling favorable wind-stress is calculated as:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SW</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the air density which is assumed as
1.22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the drag coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
computed using the formulation of Yelland and Taylor (1996); <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the zonal (eastward) and meridional (northward) wind speed
components respectively; <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the angles between
the along-shore direction and the wind speed components and in this
case both of them are assumed to 45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> because in our study the
upwelling favorable wind-stress is from the direction of southwest
(SW).</p>
      <p>In order to estimate the relationship between upwelling and the
monsoon, we employ the Indian monsoon index (IMI) defined by Wang and
Fan (1999) and the all India monsoon rainfall index (IMR) from the
Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology (Parthasarathy et al., 1994)
as well as the Webster and Yang monsoon index (WYM) defined by Webster
and Yang (1992). We calculate the IMI and WYM based on wind speed from
NCEP/NCAR reanalysis while the IMR is obtained from station rainfall
records in India. Besides, several other meteorological and oceanic
variables are also investigated. Air temperature data produced by
University of Delaware (Willmott and Matsuura, 2012) and sea level
pressure (SLP) data from the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis are investigated to
provide further understanding. Because of a continuity issue in the
STORM simulation output (missing data in 1949), we limit the study
period from 1950 to 2010. All data share the same temporal coverage
except the period covered by SST data from AVHRR from 1985 to 2009,
the wind from CCMP covers from 1988 to 2010, and the IMR is from 1950
to 2000.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Coastal upwelling in the western Arabian Sea</title>
      <p>Upwelling along the west coast of the Arabian Sea usually starts in
May and ends in September (Brock et al., 1991). This is well
reproduced in the modeled annual cycle of the upwelling velocity
(Fig. 1a), which is converted from the original model output of upward
water mass transport. Thus, positive values indicate upwelling whereas
negative values indicate downwelling. The upwelling velocity annual
cycle shows that the significant positive values start from May, peak
in July and end in September. As one of the traditional upwelling
indices, the SW wind-stress (Fig. 1b) is in good consistency with the
upwelling velocity with a peak in July as well. Another traditional
upwelling index is the observed coastal SST and our modeled SST
(Fig. 1c) also reveals good correlation with the upwelling velocity
with a lag of approximately one month. This lag can be explained by
the time needed to transport deeper and cooler water to the surface
and it matches a similar lag between wind-stress and SST found in the
observations by Rixen et al. (2000). It is obvious that the ranges of
these three annual cycles tend to get larger when the upwelling
becomes stronger. Therefore, unless indicated otherwise, we average
the values from June to August (JJA) for upwelling velocity and SW
wind-stress in the following analyses and we select July to September
(JAS) for SST due to the mentioned lag.</p>
      <p>The coastal upwelling domain in this study (Fig. 1d) is chosen from
15.2 to 22.3<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N along the coast of Yemen and Oman with an
expansion of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Rixen et al., 2000). According to
Brock and Mcclain (1992), we average the upwelling velocity over the
upper 200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of water. This selected coastal band is very
narrow but with the advantage from the high resolution of the STORM
simulation we are able to observe the spatial patterns of the
upwelling in the study domain. The simulated mean upwelling velocity
averaged over this domain in JJA from 1950 to 2010 is about
1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">day</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Upwelling is less intense in the area north
to Ras Madrakah and much stronger at regions near the capes such as
Sawqirah and Nishtun where the velocity can exceed
6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">day</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Upwelling variability</title>
      <p>For an understanding about the spatial variability of upwelling in
this region, we calculate the standard deviation (SD) and perform an
Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) analysis (von Storch and Zwiers,
2001) of the upwelling velocity. The SD map (Fig. 2a) shows that
higher intensity of upwelling comes with higher variance, that is, in
the regions where the upwelling velocity is higher (Fig. 1d), the SD
of the upwelling velocity is also higher The mean SD over the entire
study area is about 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">day</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is nearly half of
the mean upwelling velocity. The EOF analysis is a method that
identifies the main spatial patterns of coherent variation. This
method identifies spatial patterns, uncorrelated, in time, that
describe most of the data variance. The first EOF mode explains most
of the variance, which represents the most apparent variation in the
data. In our case the leading mode arising from the EOF analysis
(Fig. 2b) reveals apparent coastal-offshore pattern and accounts for
10 % of the total variance. The first principal component (PC1)
time series is highly consistent with the spatially averaged upwelling
velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, shown in Fig. 3b). However, the high SD with
respect to the mean value of upwelling velocity and the low explained
variance from the first mode of the EOF analysis together indicate
that the upwelling in this region is affected by various and complex
processes.</p>
      <p>Beside the spatial variability, the temporal variability of upwelling
is studied as well. The primary attempt is to detect a trend in the
upwelling time series referring to the Bakun hypothesis (Bakun, 1990)
that upwelling intensification appears at global scale. However, only
a negligible increasing trend is revealed over the last
61 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 3a). This trend has a slope of
0.0035 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">day</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">year</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is only 0.2 % of the
mean coastal upwelling velocity in the domain. Hence, it is concluded
that no detectable trend can be found in our upwelling velocity and
thus we do not further discuss about trends in the following text. To
make sure all the variables are comparable with each other, we remove
the trends in all of them for further analyses.</p>
      <p>We compare the time series of the upwelling velocity with SST and the
SW wind-stress to validate our modeled upwelling data since they are
generally applied as coastal upwelling indices (Fig. 3b–d). The time
series of upwelling and SST are generated using data within the
upwelling domain shown in Fig. 1d while the SW wind-stress time series
contains data from a broader area due to the low resolution of the
wind data. In Fig. 3b, the upwelling velocity and the PC1 time series
from the EOF analysis are compared with SST from the STORM simulation
and the SW wind-stress from the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis. The comparison
reveals that the upwelling is strongly negatively correlated to the
SST (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.83) as well as positively to the SW wind-stress
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>Since the SST and the upwelling velocity are both outputs from the
STORM simulation and the NCEP wind data is the forcing used in this
simulation, these high correlations are to some extent expected and
less persuasive without the support from extra sources. Therefore, we
employ wind data from CCMP and SST data from AVHRR (Fig. 3c and d) as
they are independent of the STORM simulation, although their temporal
coverages are shorter than STORM.  The correlations between simulated
upwelling and these two observed variables are lower (wind <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and SST <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.45) but they remain significant at the 95 % level
or higher as in the previous analysis. These results suggest that the
upwelling velocity derived from the STORM simulation is significantly
consistent with the traditional upwelling indices so it is reasonable
to use it for further studies such as investigating the responsible
processes affecting the upwelling.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Link to the Monsoon</title>
      <p>As the ISM has been suggested to be strongly linked to the western
Arabian Sea upwelling, we examine the relationship between the
simulated upwelling velocity and the monsoon indices Indian monsoon
index (IMI), all India monsoon rainfall index (IMR) and the Webster
and Yang monsoon index (WYM) in Fig. 4. Note that the IMR is computed
by integrating the total rainfall records of numerous stations from
June to September (JJAS) and the data source is not available for
single months. Thus, we calculate the IMI and the WYM and also the
upwelling velocity for the extended JJAS season. All of the three
comparisons show low and negative correlations in the northern part of
the domain. Higher correlations are found along the coast and to the
south especially the regions with more intense upwelling and larger
variance, but only a few areas show correlations that pass the
significance level of 95 %.</p>
      <p>One interesting finding is that the correlation patterns obtained with
IMI (Fig. 4a) and with IMR (Fig. 4b) are quite similar. The
correlations start to become positive at Ras Madrakah and the highest
and the most significant correlations are located between Sawqirah and
Nishtun. Besides, the areas with stronger correlation and higher
significance highly overlap.  Considering the fact that IMI is
calculated from the difference of two SLP fields whereas IMR is
obtained from the rainfall records, this similarity indicates that the
upwelling has very similar link to the variation of the SLP and the
rainfall. However, the WYM correlation pattern (Fig. 4c) shows
a different case where the positive values begin to appear from the
north of Ras Madrakah and the strongest and most significant
correlation lies between Ras Madrakah and Nishtun. Although WYM is
also calculated from the difference of two SLP fields, the strategies
for selecting the SLP fields are not the same and this is causing the
difference between the patterns of IMI and WYM. Additionally, as the
SLP-based indices, IMI and WYM patterns capture reduced correlations
near Salalah but IMR does not.</p>
      <p>The spatially heterogeneous correlations indicate that the upwelling
velocities in different regions along the western Arabian Sea coast
are sensitive to different forcing mechanisms. Furthermore, it is
surprising that the overall correlations of upwelling with all monsoon
indices are rather low and insignificant. This analysis, therefore,
indicates that the impact of the ISM on western Arabian Sea coastal
upwelling is weak and limited to areas with upwelling of higher
intensity (Fig. 1d) and variability (Fig. 2a).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>SLP and Monsoon</title>
      <p>In order to determine the other possible forcings that could influence
the variability of upwelling, we correlate the PC1 time series of
upwelling to SLP and air temperature in the broader Asian (Indian
Ocean) region. As the first principal component time series from the
EOF analysis, PC1 captures the major variation of the upwelling
velocity. In Fig. 5a, the correlation between PC1 and SLP is shown in
the background contour, while the two-dimensional correlation with
wind is superimposed on it. Positive correlation to SLP is found in
the Arabian Sea and negative correlation over the Himalayas. The areas
with the strongest positive and negative correlations are within the
regions used for calculating the IMI. We take one box from the highest
positive correlation area and one box from the highest negative
correlation area. The SLP gradient between these two areas boxes
presents a strong correlation with averaged upwelling PC1
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This is also evidenced in the correlation between the
upwelling PC1 and the wind speed vectors. It is obvious that the
upwelling PC1 is significantly correlated to the southwestern wind in
the Arabian Sea as a result of the gradient of SLP. Furthermore, along
the western coast where the upwelling exists, the connection with the
southwestern wind is the strongest.</p>
      <p>Also importantly, Fig. 5b reveals a link between the upwelling PC1 and
the surface air temperature. The upwelling PC1 is positively
correlated to the air temperature over the Tibetan Plateau and
negatively correlated to that over northern India. Both correlations
are significant and similar to the study with the SLP field we select
two boxes from the air temperature field as well. The correlation
between the upwelling PC1 and the gradient of these two regions is
also not negligible (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The links between the upwelling PC1
and SLP as well as the air temperature imply that other factors also
affect upwelling.</p>
      <p>Finally, we correlate the monsoon indices with the SLP field to gain
a better understanding about their different influences on the
upwelling. Same as the analysis of the correlation between upwelling
and the monsoon indices, we extend the selected period of SLP to JJAS
before the calculation. The IMI (Fig. 6a) and IMR (Fig. 6b) again show
similar patterns. They both have positive correlations with the SLP
over the Tibetan Plateau and strong negative correlations in the
Arabian Sea. Some minor differences are that the strong negatively
correlated region with IMR is larger than that with IMI and the IMI
shows more positive correlated areas over North Africa. The positive
correlations over the Tibetan Plateau and the negative correlations in
the Arabian Sea explains the similar correlation patterns between
these two monsoon indices and the upwelling velocity shown in
Fig. 4. The WYM (Fig. 6c), however, does not present significant
correlation gradient with the SLP over the Tibetan Plateau and in the
Arabian Sea. It reveals concentrated negative correlations along the
coastal area and shares a similar positive correlation pattern over
the North Africa as shown in IMI. Considering the significant
correlation between the upwelling velocity and the SLP revealed in
Fig. 5, it is possible to conclude that the upwelling is related to
the monsoon, however the driving forces of the upwelling and the
monsoon are different.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussion and conclusions</title>
      <p>In this study we use the vertical water mass transport data provided
by a high-resolution global ocean simulation over the past decades to
identify the atmospheric drivers of upwelling along the west coast of
the Arabian Sea. With significantly improved spatial resolution, our
modeled upwelling velocity presents consistent annual cycle with the
traditional upwelling indices.</p>
      <p>One limitation of our study that has to be borne in mind is the degree
of realism of the ocean model used. Another possible limitation is the
realism of the atmospheric forcing (NCEP/NCAR meteorological
reanalysis) used to drive the ocean model. It is difficult to validate
the simulated upwelling against direct observations of vertical
velocities, and thus we have to rely on indirect analysis. Here, we
showed that the link between simulated upwelling and SSTs, and the
correlation between simulated upwelling and independent wind-stress
data suggest a reasonable degree of realism of the ocean simulation.</p>
      <p>One main conclusion of our study is that in general, no significant
long-term trend is detected in the upwelling time series.</p>
      <p>The upwelling intensity and variability are found to be higher along
the southern coast than along the northern coast and this tendency is
revealed in the upwelling variability as well. This result suggests
that upwelling along the southern coast is more intense. In addition,
the southern coast is also the region where upwelling is most
significantly connected to the ISM but the correlation between them is
not as high as expected from previous studies. Therefore, this
simulation does not reveal a strong impact of the Indian Monsoon on
the western Arabian Sea coastal upwelling.</p>
      <p>This low correlation points to other processes that might contribute
to the upwelling variability. Both SLP and surface air temperature are
considered and are compared with the upwelling PC1. The comparisons
indicate that the upwelling is strongly affected by the SLP gradient
between the Himalayas and the Arabian Sea as well as the air
temperature gradient between the Tibetan Plateau and northern
India. These two gradients, however, also affect the ISM (Feng and Hu,
2005; Krishnamurthy and Ajayamohan, 2010) so caution should be taken
when distinguishing the sources that influence the upwelling. On one
hand, the upwelling is weakly correlated to the ISM but significantly
correlated to the SLP and the air temperature gradients; on the other
hand, both of the SLP and the air temperature gradients are associated
with the ISM. Nevertheless, due to the significant correlation between
this SLP gradient and the upwelling, it is possible to derive a new
upwelling index based on this gradient to describe the western Arabian
Sea coastal upwelling.</p>
      <p>The lack of long-term observational data restricts the validation of
the results and the data from satellite ocean-color observations are
heavily blocked during the upwelling season in the Arabian
Sea. Methods such as the one described by Banzon et al. (2004) will
help to recover the gaps in the satellite data and thus the recovered
data might be possible to further inspect the results in this study.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work is funded by the Cluster of Excellence Integrated Climate
System Analysis and Prediction (CliSAP) Project B3. We thank the
Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology for providing the model
data. All the other publicly available data used in this study are
gratefully acknowledged.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>  The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> by a Research Centre of the Helmholtz Association.</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, D. M., Brock, J. C., and Prell, W. L.: Physical upwelling processes, upper ocean environment and the sediment
record of the southwest monsoon, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 64, 121–129, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, D. M., Overpeck, J. T., and Gupta, A. K.: Increase in the Asian southwest monsoon during the past four centuries, Science, 297, 596–599, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Atlas, R., Hoffman, R. N., Ardizzone, J., Leidner, S. M., Jusem, J. C., Smith, D. K., and Gombos, D.: A cross-calibrated multiplatform ocean surface wind velocity product for meteorological and oceanographic applications, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 157–174, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bakun, A.: Coastal Upwelling Indices, West Coast of North America, 1946–71, NOAA Tech. Rep., 1973, 103, US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bakun, A.: Global climate change and intensification of coastal ocean upwelling, Science, 247, 198–201, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Banzon, V. F., Evans, R. E., Gordon, H. R., and Chomko, R. M.: SeaWiFS observations of the Arabian Sea southwest monsoon bloom for the year 2000, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 51, 189–208, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Brock, J. C. and Mcclain, C. R.: Interannual variability in phytoplankton blooms observed in the northwestern Arabian Sea during the Southwest Monsoon, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 97, 733–750, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Brock, J. C., Mcclain, C. R., Luther, M. E., and Hay, W. W.: The phytoplankton bloom in the northwestern Arabian Sea during the Southwest Monsoon of 1979, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 96, 20623–20642, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Casey, K. S., Brandon, T. B., Cornillon, P., and Evans, R.: The past, present, and future of the AVHRR Pathfinder
SST program, in: Oceanography from Space, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, the Netherlands,  273–287, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Curry, W., Ostermann, D., Guptha, M., and Ittekkot, V.: Foraminiferal production and monsoonal upwelling in the Arabian Sea:
evidence from sediment traps, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 64, 93–106, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Emeis, K. C., Anderson, D. M., Doose, H., Kroon, D., and Schulzbull, D.: Sea-surface temperatures and the history of monsoon upwelling in the northwest Arabian Sea during the last 500,000 years, Quaternary Res., 43, 355–361, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Feng, S. and Hu, Q.: Regulation of Tibetan Plateau heating on variation of Indian summer monsoon in the last two millennia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L02702, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021246" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL021246</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Findlater, J.: A major low-level air current near Indian Ocean during northern summer, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 95, 362–380, 1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Godad, S. P., Naidu, P. D., and Malmgren, B. A.: Sea surface temperature changes during May and August in the western Arabian Sea over the last 22 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kyr</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: implications as to shifting of the upwelling season, Mar. Micropaleontol., 78, 25–29, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Izumo, T., Montegut, C. D., Luo, J. J., Behera, S. K., Masson, S., and Yamagata, T.: The role of the western Arabian Sea upwelling in Indian Monsoon rainfall variability, J. Climate, 21, 5603–5623, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Jacox, M. G., Moore, A. M., Edwards, C. A., and Fiechter, J.: Spatially resolved upwelling in the California Current System and its connections to climate variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 3189–3196, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K. C., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77, 437–471, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Krishnamurthy, V. and Ajayamohan, R. S.: Composite structure of Monsoon low pressure systems and its relation to Indian rainfall, J. Climate, 23, 4285–4305, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Kroon, D., Steens, T., and Troelstra, S. R.: Onset of monsoonal related upwelling in the western Arabian
Sea as revealed by planktonic foraminifers, Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, 117, 257–263, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, J. F., Liu, H. L., Lin, P. F., and Zhan, H. G.: Seasonality of biological feedbacks on sea surface temperature variations in the Arabian Sea: the role of mixing and upwelling, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119, 7592–7604, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Manghnani, V., Morrison, J. M., Hopkins, T. S., and Bohm, E.: Advection of upwelled waters in the form of plumes off Oman during the Southwest Monsoon, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 45, 2027–2052, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Naik, S. S., Godad, S. P., Naidu, P. D., and Ramaswamy, V.: A comparison of Globigerinoides ruber calcification between upwelling and non-upwelling regions in the Arabian Sea, J. Earth Syst. Sci., 122, 1153–1159, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Narayan, N., Paul, A., Mulitza, S., and Schulz, M.: Trends in coastal upwelling intensity during the late 20th century, Ocean Sci., 6, 815–823,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/os-6-815-2010">10.5194/os-6-815-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Parthasarathy, B., Munot, A. A., and Kothawale, D. R.: All-India
monthly and seasonal rainfall series – 1871–1993, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 49, 217–224, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Prell, W. L. and Curry, W. B.: Faunal and isotopic indexes of monsoonal upwelling – western Arabian Sea, Oceanol. Acta, 4, 91–98, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Prell, W. L. and Vancampo, E.: Coherent response of Arabian Sea upwelling and pollen transport to Late Quaternary Monsoonal winds, Nature, 323, 526–528, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Rao, A. D., Joshi, M., and Ravichandran, M.: Oceanic upwelling and downwelling processes in waters off the west coast of India, Ocean Dynam., 58, 213–226, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Rixen, T., Haake, B., and Ittekkot, V.: Sedimentation in the western Arabian Sea the role of coastal and open-ocean upwelling, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 47, 2155–2178, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Shi, W., Morrison, J. M., Bohm, E., and Manghnani, V.: The Oman upwelling zone during 1993, 1994 and 1995, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 47, 1227–1247, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Tozuka, T., Nagura, M., and Yamagata, T.: Influence of the reflected Rossby waves on the western Arabian Sea upwelling region, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 44, 1424–1438, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
von Storch, H. and Zwiers, F. W.: Statistical Analysis in Climatic Research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 484 pp., 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
von Storch, J.-S., Eden, C., Fast, I., Haak, H., Hernández-Deckers, D., Maier-Reimer, E., Marotzke, J., and Stammer, D.: An estimate of the Lorenz energy cycle for the world ocean based on the STORM/NCEP simulation, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 42, 2185–2205, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, B. and Fan, Z.: Choice of south Asian summer monsoon indices, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 629–638, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, D. W., Gouhier, T. C., Menge, B. A., and Ganguly, A. R.: Intensification and spatial homogenization of coastal upwelling under climate change, Nature, 518, 390–394, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Webster, P. J. and Yang, S.: Monsoon and Enso – selectively interactive systems, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 118, 877–926, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Willmott, C. and Matsuura, K.: Terrestrial Air Temperature: 1900–2010
Gridded Monthly Time Series, Version 3.01, Center for Climatic
Research, Dep. of Geography, University of Delaware, Newark, available
at: <uri>http://climate.geog.udel.edu/~climate</uri> (last access: 1 September  2014), 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Yelland, M. and Taylor, P. K.: Wind-stress measurements from the open ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 26, 541–558, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Annual cycle of <bold>(a)</bold> upwelling velocity, <bold>(b)</bold>
SW wind-stress and <bold>(c)</bold> sea-surface temperature averaged for
the study area. Color shaded areas are the ranges of the annual
cycles and grey shaded months are the study periods selected for
each variable. <bold>(d)</bold> JJA mean upwelling velocity from 1950 to
2010. The red contour demonstrates the study area.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/2683/2015/osd-12-2683-2015-f01.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F2"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Standard deviation of JJA upwelling velocity
from 1950 to 2010. <bold>(b)</bold> First mode of the EOF analysis with
its explained variance in parentheses.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/2683/2015/osd-12-2683-2015-f02.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F3"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Time series of upwelling velocity and its long
term trend. <bold>(b)</bold> Comparison of upwelling velocity, upwelling
PC1, SW wind-stress from NCEP and SST from STORM. <bold>(c)</bold>
Upwelling velocity and SW wind-stress from CCMP. <bold>(d)</bold>
Upwelling velocity and SST from AVHRR. All the time series in
<bold>(b)</bold>, <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> are detrended and
normalized.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/2683/2015/osd-12-2683-2015-f03.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Correlation between upwelling velocity and <bold>(a)</bold> IMI,
<bold>(b)</bold> IMR as well as <bold>(c)</bold> WYM indices. Within the
green contours are the areas where the significant levels are
95 % or higher. The plots on the right column are the meridional
mean correlation coefficient between upwelling velocity and each
monsoon index averaged within the study area. The upper dashed line
indicates the general starting points of the positive
correlation. Between the middle and the lower dashed lines are the
areas where the correlations are the highest.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/2683/2015/osd-12-2683-2015-f04.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F5"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Correlation between upwelling PC1 and SLP is
represented by the background color contour. Green arrows are the
two-dimensional correlation between upwelling velocity and the wind
speed. <bold>(b)</bold> Background color contour is the correlation
between upwelling PC1 and the air temperature. The lower plots are
the time series of the PC1 and the corresponding time series of the
gradient between the two selected boxes in the upper maps. The two
plots are detrended and normalized.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/2683/2015/osd-12-2683-2015-f05.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Correlations between SLP and the monsoon indices:
<bold>(a)</bold> IMI, <bold>(b)</bold> IMR and <bold>(c)</bold> WYM.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/2683/2015/osd-12-2683-2015-f06.png"/>

    </fig>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
