<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \hack{\sloppy}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">OSD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Ocean Science Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">OSD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ocean Sci. Discuss.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1812-0822</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/osd-12-1711-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Technical Note: Medium-term morphodynamics in <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> an unprotected sandy beach of <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> the Adriatic Sea</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Technical Note: Medium-term morphodynamics in an unprotected beach}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M.~Postacchini et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Postacchini</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          <email>m.postacchini@univpm.it</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3208-9922</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Soldini</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lorenzoni</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Mancinelli</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Civil and Building Engineering, and Architecture, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">M. Postacchini (m.postacchini@univpm.it)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>10</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>1711</fpage><lpage>1728</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>7</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1711/2015/osd-12-1711-2015.html">This article is available from https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1711/2015/osd-12-1711-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1711/2015/osd-12-1711-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1711/2015/osd-12-1711-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>In the recent years attention has been paid to the beach protection by means
of soft and hard defenses. Along the Italian coasts of the Adriatic Sea,
sandy beaches are the most common landscapes and around 70 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
Marche-Region coasts (central Adriatic), is protected by defense structures.
The longest free-from-obstacle nearshore area in the Region includes the
beach of Senigallia, characterized by a multiple barred beach, frequently
monitored during the last decades. The bathymetries surveyed in 2006, 2010,
2011, 2012 and 2013 show a good adaptation of the beach to the Dean-type
equilibrium profile, though a strong short-/medium-term variability of the
wave climate has been observed during the monitored periods. This suggests a
slight influence of wave forcing on the long-term profiles, which seems to
only depend on the sediment size. Further, the medium-term dynamics of the
submerged bars and their geometric features have been related to the wave
climate collected by a wave buoy located <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>40</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> off Senigallia
during the analyzed temporal windows. An overall interpretation of the
complete dynamics, i.e. hydrodynamics (buoy data), sediment characteristics
(equilibrium-profile <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter) and morphodynamics (bathymetric surveys),
suggests that the wave climate is fundamental for the morphodynamic changes
of the beach in the medium term: waves coming from NNE/ESE are characterized
by a larger/smaller steepness and induce seaward/shoreward bar migration, as
well as bar smoothing/steepening. Moving southward, the bar dimension
increases, while the equilibrium profile suggests a decrease of the sediment
size in the submerged beach, this probably due to the presence of both harbor
jetty and river mouth North of the investigated area.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Some important issues concerning the present society deal with the inundation
risk in the coastal areas, the protection of nearshore regions, the use of
beaches for tourist and recreational activities. In the last decade, such
topics have been of great importance due to short- and long-term predictions
associated with the climate change, which is representing a significant
threat for what concerns the flooding issue in the present and future years
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g., see</named-content></xref>. These changes are associated with both the
mean sea-level rise and the more frequent sea storms, also occurring during
the summer time. The understanding of the main physical processes driven by
such changes is fundamental for (i) the modeling of the nearshore dynamics
(e.g., in terms of rapid morphological changes of the beach), (ii) the
correct prediction of coastal flooding, and (iii) the proper design of
protection solutions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.2"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g., see</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p>Several studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> showed that a proper
representation of the local bathymetry is fundamental to both correctly
predict the seabed changes induced by wave/current forcing and support
studies aimed at designing efficient solutions for the coastal protection. It
has been demonstrated that the use of the equilibrium beach profile
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> properly describes the long-term equilibrium of
a natural beach, as demonstrated (i) by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.5"/>, who investigated the
main features of the equilibrium beach profile at several cross-shore
locations of a nourished beach and after a sea storm, and (ii) by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.6"/>, who numerically confirmed the feasibility of using an
equilibrium beach profile to represent the coastal inundation/flooding of
a natural barred beach. The equilibrium profile of a beach represents the
balance between erosive and accretive forcing, and is represented by the law:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the water depth and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the distance to shoreline. The features
of the equilibrium profile depend on a dimensional shape parameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and on
the exponent, which is usually <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.7"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.8"/> proposed
an empirical correlation between the parameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the median grain diameter
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the sediment fall velocity <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.9"/>
stated that an easier correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be properly
used.</p>
      <p>Recently, further models have been developed in order to account for: (i) the
beach slope at the swash zone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.10"/>, (ii) the sediment size variation
along the cross-shore profile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.11"/>, (iii) the seasonal changes of
the profiles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.12"/>, (iv) the generation of submerged bars due to wave
breaking <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.13"/>. However, the application of such models, which better
represent the real equilibrium profile of a beach, is often very difficult,
because they require several field data, which are not always available. On
the other hand, the simple model (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) can be easily used for
prediction/design purposes and well represents the long-term natural beach
profile <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.14"/>. The estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be accomplished by
applying, on both natural and theoretical profiles, either a least-square
method or an integration of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) up to a reference depth.</p>
      <p>Submerged subtidal bars are typical of unprotected sandy beaches. They
usually generate on bottom slopes within <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>0.005</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>0.03</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and their height
ranges between some centimeters to meters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.15"/>. In semi-protected
and open coasts, two-dimensional longshore bars are quite common and have
been extensively studied, though the complex mechanisms of generation and
migration are not yet completely understood. Generation of submerged bars can
be ascribed to three different mechanisms, i.e. wave breaking, infragravity
waves and self arrangement <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.16"/>. Further, the bar migration mainly
depends on the ratio between wave height <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and water depth over the bar
crest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>cr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with values smaller than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or larger than
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>0.6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> promoting, respectively, landward or seaward migration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.17"/>.
Field observations confirmed a cyclic behavior of multiple bars, mainly
characterized by three stages, i.e. initial generation, seaward migration and
final degradation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.18"/>. Conversely, other authors observed
a continuous landward motion, until bar-shore welding, even during storm
events <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.19"/>. The offshore migration is probably promoted by the
undertow dominance in the net transport balance (e.g., in the Northern Dutch
coast), while the onshore migration is enhanced by storm surges, these both
(i) increasing skewness and phase coupling, and (ii) reducing the undertow
contribution, which depends on the relative wave height <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>cr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.20"/>.</p>
      <p>The novelty of the paper is represented by the detailed analysis of the
seabed evolution of a natural unprotected beach of the Italian Middle
Adriatic, i.e. that of the touristic town of Senigallia (Marche Region,
Italy). The available bathymetries, covering the last decade, and the wave
climate, enable us to analyze in detail the medium-term morphological
evolution of the beach, including the geometry and migration of the submerged
bars, as function of the wave forcing. To the authors' knowledge, this is the
first study which analyzes the medium-term beach evolution and bar migration
occurring in the sandy beaches of the Adriatic Sea.</p>
      <p>The manuscript is divided as follows.
Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> illustrates the available data, while Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> describes the investigated site.
Results are presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> and discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental data</title>
      <p>The natural beach South of the harbor of Senigallia was characterized by
a number of bathymetric surveys since the 80s. More recently, due to
a specific requirement of the Marche Region, a detailed survey of the
nearshore region of Senigallia was undertaken in June 2006, both North and
South of the harbor, such areas being respectively characterized by
a protected and an unprotected beach. The surveys interested the nearshore
region up to a depth of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a total length of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
most of which (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.9</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the Southern natural unprotected
beach (the final DTM is illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/>a).</p>
      <p>Between 2010 and 2013, after the modification of the harbor entrance, annual
bathymetric surveys up to a depth of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were carried out by the
municipality of Senigallia on a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-long area covering part of
the protected and part of the unprotected beaches (example of cross-shore
profiles are illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/>c).</p>
      <p>The analysis of all surveys enabled us to extract 18 cross-shore profiles
which characterize the unprotected beach for about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is
used for the analysis of the morphological changes induced by the wave
climate throughout years, in terms of both bar migration and geometry.</p>
      <p>From the analysis of both surveys and satellite data, the submerged bars
remain for a stretch of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Further, moving southeastward,
the sediment size changes, with a transition from sand to gravel occurring
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> South of the harbor <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.21"/>. Hence, the initially
two-dimensional longshore bars of the investigated area get closer to the
shoreline, thus switching to three-dimensional (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/>d).
However, the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-long area South of the harbor can be taken as
representative of the sandy beaches characterizing the Middle Adriatic Sea
and will be analyzed in the next sections.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Description of the site</title>
      <p>The studied coast is part of the longest unprotected beach of the Marche
Region, which extends from the Senigallia harbor to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
North of the Esino River estuary, hence for a total length of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>12</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/>d). The investigated site is
characterized by a swash zone with slope in the range <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, an
array of submerged bars in a water depth between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
a mild slope of about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for depths larger than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
emerged beach is characterized by fine (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and medium (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) sands, while fine sand was found
in the submerged part.</p>
      <p>The wave climate in the investigated area was obtained from a waverider of
the Italian wave measurement network (RON), located <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>23</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
East-North-East of Senigallia. It worked between March 1999 and March 2006
and between December 2009 and November 2013, the data between 2006 and 2010
surveys thus missing. During the 11 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">years</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> recordings, the waves
mainly came from ESE and NNE (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/>b), the main events hence
induced by Bora (coming from NNE) and Levante-Scirocco (from ESE) winds. The
wave frequency (empty area) is better distributed throughout the directions,
with smooth peaks in correspondence of the main directions ESE and NNE, with
respect to the wave energy (full area), characterized by sharper peaks.</p>
      <p>The analysis of the beach morphology using the concept of the equilibrium
beach profile leads to the estimate of both a fitting depth
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.22"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> and the shape parameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which strictly depends on
the median grain diameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Using either the least-square approach or
the continuity of volume, i.e. integration of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), the results
are similar. From the DTM of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/>a, referring to June 2006,
66 profiles have been extracted. It is important to notice that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
similarly <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, decreases moving southward. The largest values occur
close to the Senigallia harbor (profile 1 of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/>),
i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>≅</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.069</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.23"/>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≅</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.15</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the smallest occur <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.9</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> South of the
harbor (profile 66), where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>≅</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.060</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≅</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.13</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Such values are in agreement with the fine sand characterizing the submerged
beach <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.24"/>. A good adaptation to the equilibrium beach profiles,
with similar values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, has also been found throughout the coast for the
2010–2013 surveys, from which 18 profiles have been extracted. Further, the
fitting depth increases North and decreases South of the “Rotonda”,
i.e. the pile-mounted permeable structure within profiles 11 and 12, this
suggesting a sediment motion occurring at larger depths in correspondence of
such a structure.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p>The following sections illustrate the analysis of the seabed variation using
the available bathymetric surveys and wave climate. Both migration and
geometry of the submerged bars are also discussed.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Bathymetric surveys</title>
      <p>The available bathymetries refer to June 2006, February 2010, February 2011,
April 2012 and May 2013. They all have been overlapped using ArcGIS software
and the difference in the bed depth have been estimated between each pair of
consecutive surveys. Hence, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F2"/> illustrates the
difference between the bed depth measured in 2010 and that measured in 2006
(a), 2011 and 2010 (b), 2012 and 2011 (c), 2013 and 2012 (d). Each case shows
seabed variations which are mostly parallel to the coast. Such parallel
patterns illustrate the different location of the submerged bars and their
migration through years. In each panel, positive/negative values mean that
a seabed accretion/erosion occurred during the considered time period. Large
positive values indicate either the filling of the bar trough or the new
location of the bar crest at the end of the time period (e.g., see the
longshore distribution of positive values in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F2"/>a, b, and
d, these representing the crest location in, respectively, 2010, 2011, 2013).
Further, large negative values may also indicate a bar-crest smoothing and
a general beach flattening, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F2"/>c.</p>
      <p>The shoreline is fairly stable and move in the cross-shore direction less
than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>20</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the largest motions occurring within 2006–2010
(advance) and 2011–2012 (retreat). The bar crest locations are overlapped to
the color maps of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F2"/>, in order to reconstruct their
migration. A shoreward migration of the bars occurred within 2006–2010,
2010–2011 and 2012–2013, while a seaward motion only occurred between 2011
and 2012, when the bars were partially destroyed. After 2012, a partial bar
regeneration occurred. The location of the “Rotonda” also affects the bar
generation/existence, e.g. in 2010 the offshore bar only exists South of the
structure, in 2011 only North.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Wave climate</title>
      <p>The wave climate is illustrated at the top right angle of each panel of
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F2"/>, except for the period 2006–2010, during which wave
data were not available. This shows that the most frequent and energetic
waves are those coming from either ESE, i.e. forced by Levante-Scirocco winds
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F2"/>b and d), or NNE, i.e. forced by Bora winds
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F2"/>c). While the wave frequency is fairly well
distributed throughout the rose, though the NNE and ESE peaks, the wave
energy is characterized by sharper peaks in correspondence of the dominant
directions and a reduced distribution elsewhere.</p>
      <p>With reference to both frequency and energy flux, a statistic analysis of the
main sectors has been undertaken for each time period, i.e. ESE sector
(105–135<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for 2010–2011 and 2012–2013 and NNE sector
(15–45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for 2011–2012. During the former time periods, the largest
energetic contribution is ascribed to significant wave heights in the range
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2010–2011) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2012–2013). The most frequent
waves falling in such ranges are characterized by mean periods
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2010–2011) and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2012–2013). In the same years, peak
periods are respectively <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>6.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>8.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>8.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the NNE period, the largest
energetic contribution belongs to a narrower wave-height range,
i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which corresponds to most
frequent waves falling within the ranges
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>With the purpose of characterizing each time period with specific wave features, the most energetic direction (ESE/NNE), associated with the most probable wave-height range <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, gives the most probable wave-period range <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
This results in the following mean values, which represent the most probable combinations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), related to the most energetic waves.
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>2010–2011: ESE, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.75</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>5.25</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.25</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></p></list-item><list-item><p>2011–2012: NNE, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.25</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>5.25</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>6.75</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></p></list-item><list-item><p>2012–2013: ESE, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.75</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>5.25</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.25</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></p></list-item></list>
As expected, a larger wave steepness occurs during the NNE period than during the ESE ones.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Bar characterization</title>
      <p>The previous data have been used to introduce a detailed analysis of the
morphodynamics of the submerged beach, especially the bar geometry and
migration. Each of the 18 cross-shore profiles have been characterized by
means of: (i) the shoreline position from a fixed point (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sh</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
(ii) the distance of each bar crest from both fixed point (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>cr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and shoreline (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mtext>cr</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>cr</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sh</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and (iii) the
bar geometry, i.e. crest (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>cr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and trough (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
depths.</p>
      <p>Dimensionless parameters are introduced to analyze the bar geometry.
In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F3"/> (top panel) the dimensionless bar height, i.e. the ratio between bar height (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bar</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tr</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>cr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and crest depth <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>cr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is plotted against the dimensionless bar width, i.e. the ratio between bar width (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bar</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>cr</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>tr</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and shoreline-crest distance <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mtext>cr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
In general, the bar height seems to increase with the bar width, this occurring for both inner (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>), middle (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">□</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and outer (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>) bars.
In particular, a best-fit polynomial curve can be found coupling data referring to outer and middle bars of 2010 (blue dashed line) and 2013 (orange dashed line), in both cases giving determination coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The analysis of the longshore distribution of the bar geometry can be undertaken accounting for the bar cross-shore area (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bar</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bar</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is made dimensionless using both depth and distance to shore of the bar crest.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F3"/> (bottom panel) illustrates that, in general, all bars increase in dimension quite regularly moving southward.
Focusing on years 2010, 2011 and 2013, the middle bars increase regularly between profiles 1 and 10, while South of the “Rotonda” (profiles 11–12), the trend is not clear.
The outer bars seem not to be affected by the permeable structure and keep increasing moving southward.
In 2006 the middle bar generates and starts increasing from profile 10, while in 2012 the trend is unclear, due to the reduced number of sections at which bars occur.
Best-fit curves well reproduce the increasing trend of the outer bars (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 2010 and 2013, dashed lines), more than that of the middle bars (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussion and conclusions</title>
      <p>The bathymetric surveys of the area South of the Senigallia harbor enabled us to analyze a multiple-bar array typical of the sandy beaches of the Middle Adriatic.
Such a part of the basin is subject to sea storms mainly due to NNE (Bora) and ESE (Levante-Scirocco) winds, which are characterized by significantly different surges.</p>
      <p>The seabed-depth variation and the wave climate between contiguous surveys, as well as the bar features (height, width, location) analyzed for each survey, enabled us to couple the beach/bar dynamics with the wave forcing.</p>
      <p>In the studied area the tidal excursion (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>40</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is small and only subtidal bars exist.
Since the analyzed beach slope ranges between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>35</mml:mn><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (swash zone) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn>200</mml:mn><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (offshore area), such bars fall into the group of two-dimensional longshore bars <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.25"/>.
Further, the wave energy in such a microtidal environment is quite high.</p>
      <p>From the results illustrated in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>, the bar dynamics in
this area may be influenced by either a breakpoint-related or an infragravity
wave-related mechanism, while the self-organisational mechanism is
negligible, as it can be observed from the partial bar destruction in
2011–2012 and the following re-generation in 2012–2013 (see
Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/>c and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F2"/>c and d). Such a destructive
nature of some storms in the short/medium term suggests that the bar dynamics
characterizing the Adriatic sandy beaches are mainly governed by breakpoint
mechanisms.</p>
      <p>In the analyzed region and during the investigated time periods, the beach
experienced many sea storms that enabled us to give an overall interpretation
to the bar migration process as a function of the wave climate. During the
time periods dominated by ESE forcing, waves are characterized by a reduced
steepness <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.213</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (exactly the same in
2010–2011 and 2012–2013), while this is about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> larger during the
NNE-forcing-dominated period (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.316</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Such
a behavior is also confirmed if we do not account for the most energetic
waves (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>), but directly estimate the most
frequent combination (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Hence, an
increase of the bar steepness <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bar</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bar</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is associated
to a decrease of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Further, steep NNE waves are associated with reduced storm surges, while
gentle ESE waves are characterized by large surges, due to the larger fetch
generating in the Adriatic Sea. As an example, two consecutive intense storms
occurred in December 2010, the former coming from ESE, the latter from NNE,
were characterized by maximum surges of, respectively, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>80</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>43</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, measured at the Ancona harbor (data from Rete Mareografica
Nazionale, ISPRA, <uri>http://www.mareografico.it</uri>). This leads to larger
water depths over the crest <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>cr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during ESE than during NNE waves.
Hence, the relative wave height <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mtext>cr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is smaller during ESE waves
and larger during NNE forcing, this probably promoting <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.26"/>
a shoreward migration of the bars in the former case, and a seaward migration
in the latter case, which also causes a partial bar destruction. Further,
waves coming from ESE are characterized by a significant longshore component,
due to the large angle between the coast and the approaching wave fronts.
Differently, waves coming from NNE reach the shore with an almost
perpendicular incidence, this improving the intense smoothing of the bars.</p>
      <p>While the correlation between bar width and height is clear only for some
cases, the former increasing with the latter, the cross-shore bar area
clearly increases moving southward, especially from the Senigallia harbor to
the “Rotonda”, this disturbing the middle bar growth. A similar trend has
also been found from inspection of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter of the equilibrium
profile, which suggests a slight decrease of the sand size moving southward,
this being in agreement with the sediment-size distribution observed in 1989
and 1990 by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.27"/>. A physical explanation of such a sediment
distribution is the presence of the harbor jetty, which induces a complex
flow field, i.e. a mix of refraction, diffraction and reflection, that
generates a cross sea <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.28"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g., see</named-content></xref>, especially during sea
storms coming from ESE (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.F1"/>a). Such a dynamics promotes
a mobilization of finer sands and their transport far from the jetty.</p>
      <p>Finally, the present work illustrates a preliminary analysis of the
medium-term dynamics of an unprotected sandy barred beach of the Middle
Adriatic Sea. A more detailed analysis can be achieved through use of either
data collected by another waverider (e.g., that of Cesenatico, FC, which is
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>80</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> North of Senigallia) or a reconstructed climate
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.29"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> to characterize the wave forcing in the period
2006–2010. Further, the dynamics of the nearshore area before, during and
after storm events could also be inspected by means of novel devices like:
Lagrangian drifters, able at measuring both three-dimensional hydrodynamics
and seabed depth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.30"/>, or video-monitoring of the nearshore area,
available since July–August 2015 in the framework of the EsCoSed Project
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.31"/>.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Aagaard et al.(2004)Aagaard, Davidson-Arnott, Greenwood, and
Nielsen</label><mixed-citation>
Aagaard, T., Davidson-Arnott, R., Greenwood, B., and Nielsen, J.: Sediment supply from shoreface to dunes: linking sediment transport measurements and long-term morphological evolution, Geomorphology, 60, 205–224, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Benavente et al.(2006)Benavente, Río, Gracia, and del Pozo</label><mixed-citation>
Benavente, J., Río, L. D., Gracia, F., and del Pozo, J. M.: Coastal flooding hazard related to storms and coastal evolution in Valdelagrana spit (Cadiz Bay Natural Park, SW Spain), Cont. Shelf Res.,  26, 1061–1076, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Brocchini et al.(2015)Brocchini, Calantoni, Reed, Postacchini, Lorenzoni, Russo, Mancinelli, Corvaro, Moriconi, and Soldini</label><mixed-citation>
Brocchini, M., Calantoni, J., Reed, A. H., Postacchini, M., Lorenzoni, C.,
Russo, A., Mancinelli, A., Corvaro, S., Moriconi, G., and Soldini, L.:
Summertime conditions of a muddy estuarine environment: the EsCoSed project
contribution, Water Sci. Technol., 71, 1451–1457, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Dean(1987)</label><mixed-citation>
Dean, R. G.: Coastal sediment processes: toward engineering solutions, in:
Coastal Sediments (1987), ASCE, New York, USA, 1–24, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Dean(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Dean, R. G.: Equilibrium beach profiles: characteristics and applications, J. Coastal Res.,  7, 53–84,  1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Dean and Dalrymple(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Dean, R. G. and Dalrymple, R. A.: Coastal Processes with Engineering Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,  UK ,  2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Hanson and Kraus(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Hanson, H. and Kraus, N. C.: GENESIS: Generalized Model for Simulating Shoreline Change, Report 1, Technical Reference, Tech. rep., Coastal Engineering Research Center, Vicksburg, MS, USA,  DTIC Document, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Holman et al.(2014)Holman, Lalejini, Edwards, and Veeramony</label><mixed-citation>
Holman, R. A., Lalejini, D. M., Edwards, K., and Veeramony, J.: A parametric model for barred equilibrium beach profiles, Coast. Eng.,  90, 85–94, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Houghton et al.(2010)Houghton, Vafeidis, Neumann, and Proelss</label><mixed-citation>
Houghton, K., Vafeidis, A., Neumann, B., and Proelss, A.: Maritime boundaries in a rising sea, Nat. Geosci.,  3, 813–816, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Houser and Greenwood(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Houser, C. and Greenwood, B.: Profile response of a lacustrine multiple barred nearshore to a sequence of storm events, Geomorphology, 69, 118–137, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Inman et al.(1993)Inman, Elwany, and Jenkins</label><mixed-citation>
Inman, D. L., Elwany, M. H. S., and Jenkins, S. A.: Shorerise and bar-berm profiles on ocean beaches, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans,  98, 18181–18199, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Komar and McDougal(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Komar, P. D. and McDougal, W. G.: The analysis of exponential beach profiles, J. Coastal Res.,  10, 59–69,  1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Leont'ev(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Leont'ev, I.: Submarine bars on sandy coasts, Oceanology+, 51, 141–147, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Lorenzoni et al.(1998a)Lorenzoni, Mancinelli, and Soldini</label><mixed-citation>
Lorenzoni, C., Mancinelli, A., and Soldini, L.: Caratteristiche
sedimentologiche del litorale a Nord di Ancona. Analisi del movimento delle
ghiaie (in Italian), in: Atti dell'Istituto di Idraulica dell'Università
di Ancona, Università di Ancona, Ancona, p. 54, 1998a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Lorenzoni et al.(1998b)Lorenzoni, Mancinelli, and Soldini</label><mixed-citation>
Lorenzoni, C., Mancinelli, A., and Soldini, L.: Evoluzione batimetrica del
litorale a nord di Ancona. Analisi del trasporto solido trasversale (in
Italian), in: Atti dell'Istituto di Idraulica dell'Università di Ancona,
Università di Ancona, Ancona, p. 46, 1998b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Mentaschi et al.(2015)Mentaschi, Besio, Cassola, and Mazzino</label><mixed-citation>
Mentaschi, L., Besio, G., Cassola, F., and Mazzino, A.: Performance
evaluation of Wavewatch III in the Mediterranean Sea, Ocean Model., 90,
82–94, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Postacchini et al.(2014)Postacchini, Brocchini, and Soldini</label><mixed-citation>
Postacchini, M., Brocchini, M., and Soldini, L.: Vorticity generation due to cross-sea, J. Fluid Mech.,  744, 286–309, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Postacchini et al.(2015a)Postacchini, Centurioni, Braasch, Brocchini, and Vicinanza</label><mixed-citation>Postacchini, M., Centurioni, L. R., Braasch, L., Brocchini, M., and Vicinanza, D.: Lagrangian Observations of Waves and Currents From the River Drifter, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2015.2418171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/JOE.2015.2418171</ext-link>,  2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Postacchini et al.(2015b)Postacchini, Russo, Carniel, and Brocchini</label><mixed-citation>
Postacchini, M., Russo, A., Carniel, S., and Brocchini, M.: Assessing the hydro-morphodynamic response of a beach
protected by detached, impermeable, submerged breakwaters: a numerical approach, J. Coastal Res., in press,  2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Ranasinghe et al.(2013)Ranasinghe, Duong, Uhlenbrook, Roelvink, and Stive</label><mixed-citation>
Ranasinghe, R., Duong, T., Uhlenbrook, S., Roelvink, D., and Stive, M.:
Climate-change impact assessment for inlet-interrupted coastlines, Nat. Clim. Chang.,  3, 83–87, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Ruessink and Terwindt(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Ruessink, B. and Terwindt, J.: The behaviour of nearshore bars on the time scale of years: a conceptual model, Mar. Geol.,  163, 289–302, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Soldini et al.(2013)Soldini, Antuono, and Brocchini</label><mixed-citation>
Soldini, L., Antuono, M., and Brocchini, M.: Numerical modeling of the influence of the beach profile on wave run-up, J. Waterw. Port C.-ASCE,  139, 61–71, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Walton and Dean(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Walton, T. and Dean, R.: Temporal and spatial change in equilibrium beach profiles from the Florida Panhandle, J. Waterw. Port C.-ASCE,  133, 364–376, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Wijnberg and Kroon(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Wijnberg, K. M. and Kroon, A.: Barred beaches, Geomorphology, 48, 103–120, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Natural beach of Senigallia: <bold>(a)</bold> bathymetry with isobaths and
position of cross-shore profiles referring to June 2006, <bold>(b)</bold> wave
climate referring to the time periods 1999–2006 and 2009–2013, <bold>(c)</bold>
example of cross-shore profile evolution during 2010–2013, <bold>(d)</bold>
satellite view of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> south of the harbor.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1711/2015/osd-12-1711-2015-f01.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Sea bottom variation (color map) and wind rose (top right of each panel) of
wave energy and frequency referring to the periods: <bold>(a)</bold> 2006–2010,
<bold>(b)</bold> 2010–2011, <bold>(c)</bold> 2011–2012 and
<bold>(d)</bold> 2012–2013.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1711/2015/osd-12-1711-2015-f02.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Dimensionless features: bar height against bar width (top), longshore
distribution of bar cross-shore area (bottom). Dashed and solid lines
represent best-fit curves.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=327.206693pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1711/2015/osd-12-1711-2015-f03.png"/>

    </fig>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
