<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \hack{\sloppy}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">OSD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Ocean Science Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">OSD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ocean Sci. Discuss.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1812-0822</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/osd-12-1263-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Multi-objective entropy evolutionary algorithm for marine oil spill detection using cosmo-skymed satellite data</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Multi-objective entropy evolutionary algorithm for marine oil spill detection}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M.~Marghany}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Marghany</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          <email>magedupm@hotmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Geoscience &amp; Digital Earth Center, Research Institute for
Sustainability &amp; Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,
81310 Skudai, UTM, Johor, Malaysia</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">M. Marghany (magedupm@hotmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>25</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>1263</fpage><lpage>1289</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>25</day><month>April</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>1</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1263/2015/osd-12-1263-2015.html">This article is available from https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1263/2015/osd-12-1263-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1263/2015/osd-12-1263-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1263/2015/osd-12-1263-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Oil spill pollution has a substantial role in damaging the marine
ecosystem.  Oil spill that floats on top of water, as well as
decreasing the fauna populations, affects the food chain in the
ecosystem. In fact, oil spill is reducing the sunlight penetrates
the water, limiting the photosynthesis of marine plants and
phytoplankton. Moreover, marine mammals for instance, disclosed to
oil spills their insulating capacities are reduced, and so making
them more vulnerable to temperature variations and much less buoyant
in the seawater. This study has demonstrated a design tool for oil
spill detection in SAR satellite data using optimization of Entropy
based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (E-MMGA) which based on
Pareto optimal solutions. The study also shows that optimization
entropy based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm provides an
accurate pattern of oil slick in SAR data. This shown by 85 %
for oil spill, 10 % look-alike and 5 % for sea roughness
using the receiver-operational characteristics (ROC) curve. The
E-MMGA also shows excellent performance in SAR data. In conclusion,
E-MMGA can be used as optimization for entropy to perform an
automatic detection of oil spill in SAR satellite data.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Lately, oil spills in coastal zones have received much critical
anxiety for its great damages on the coastal ecological
system. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has proved as appropriate
sensor for oil spill surveying for its wide-area and all-day
all-weather surveillance potentials. Owing to its extraordinary
imaging mechanism, conversely, the accuracy of oil spill detection is
challenged by multiplicative speckle noise and dark patches instigated
by other physical phenomena. In this perspective, dark patches do not
be related to oil spills are known as look-alikes. They can be
acclaimed to zones of low wind speed, internal waves, biogenic films,
grease ice, wind front areas, areas sheltered by land, rain cells,
current shear zones and up-welling zones (Lombardini et al., 1989;
Teivero et al., 1998; Marghany, 2001). Consequently, three steps are
expected to automatically detect oil spills in SAR images: (i) dark
spot detection, (ii) dark spot feature extraction, and (iii) dark spot
classification. Various classification algorithms for oil spill
detection have been utilized, including pattern recognition algorithms
(Teivero et al., 1998), spatial frequency spectrum gradient algorithms
(Lombardini et al., 1989; Nirchio et al., 2005) and algorithms based
on fuzzy and neural networks (Barni et al., 1995; Calabresi et al.,
1999; Garcia-Pineda et al., 2013). Consequently, the oil spill
automatic detection from SAR data are requested standard algorithm to
overwhelm the multiplicative speckle noise and look-alike phenomena
appearances. Marghany (2001) introduced entropy algorithm which is
based on texture coocurrenace matrix for oil spill automatic detection
from RADARSAT-1 SAR data. He found that entropy algorithm is able to
discriminate between oil spill and look-alike phenomena. Indeed, the
entropy algorithm can support the automatic detection of oil spill by
reducing the uncertainty on the basis of information produced by
multiplicative speckle noise and look-alike phenomena
effects. Further, Shi et al. (2008) have implemented entropy texture
algorithm for oil spill detection from SAR and optical remote sensing
data. They found that the oil spill pixels are smoother than the
surrounding environment. Shi et al. (2008) confirmed the work done by
Marghany (2001). Besides, Minchew et al. (2012) declared the
variability of the entropy is consistent with the variability of the
oil properties suggesting that the entropy is providing a qualitative
measure of the oil characteristics. Specifically, when there is open
water and a thin sheen, the entropy is close to 0, but in the presence
thicker oil (e.g. emulsion) the entropy has values that are close to
1.</p>
      <p>Conversely, Skrunes et al. (2012) reported several disadvantages
associated with oil spill detection using the current SAR sensors and
stated that SAR sensors cannot detect the thickness distribution,
volume, oil/water emulsion ratio or chemical properties of an oil
slick. Instead, that group recommended the use of multi-polarization
observations, i.e., the data acquired by the RADARSAT-2 and TerraSAR-X
satellites. In addition, quad-pol RADARSAT-2 SAR (Zhang et al., 2011)
can provide information about oil spill thickness compared to other
SAR single channel such as RADARSAT-1 SAR, ERS-1/2 and Terra SAR. In
this reagrd, range of theoretical polarimetric SAR developments has
gradually qualified the accurate distinction between mineral oil
slicks and biogenic slicks (Liu et al., 2011; Minchew et al., 2012;
Skrunes et al., 2012). Recently, Minchew et al. (2012) used
Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Synthetic Aperture Radar (UAVSAR) L-band
polarimetric for retrieving the oil volumetric concentration in
a thick slick that is based on Cloude-Pottier entropy algorithm
(Cloude and Pottier, 1996). The work of Liu et al. (2011); Minchew
et al. (2012); Skrunes et al. (2012) the Cloude-Pottier entropy
algorithm (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can provide a measure of the amount
of mixing between scattering mechanisms. For a wind-roughened ocean
surface, the scattering is dominated by a single dominant scattering
mechanisms, namely Bragg scattering (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In the presence of an
oil slick, however, the entropy increases (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) which is due to
the number independent scattering mechanisms increasing due to damping
of the small-scale Bragg waves. Nevertheless, in the region between
imaging slick-free water and an oil slick, the entropy varied as
a function of the properties of the oil (e.g. sheen, emulsion) (Liu
et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2011; Minchew et al., 2012; Skrunes
et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>Newly, Staples and Rodrigues (2013) stated that entropy cannot be
obtained from single co-polarized radar data, but requires quad-polarized data.  Quad-polarized data means that the radar acquires two
co-polarized channels (HH and VV) and two cross-polarized channels (HV
and VH), but equally as important, quad-polarized data are
phase-preserving meaning that the inter-channel phase difference
(e.g. phase difference between HH and VV) is available. In contrast,
Marghany (2001) and Marghany and van Genderen (2014) entropy texture
algorithm provides excellent performance for oil spill automatic
detection from different single SAR data.</p>
      <p>Recently, Marghany (2014) utilized the Genetic algorithm (GA) as
automatic detection algorithm for oil spill in RADARSAT-2 SAR
data. Marghany (2014a) confirmed the work of Topouzelis
et al. (2009). Both studies have agreed that the genetic algorithm is
able to extract oil spill footprint boundaries automatically from the
surrounding pixels without using a separate segmentation algorithm, as
was done by Skrunes et al. (2012). Consistent with Marghany (2014),
the genetic algorithm has the ability to determine the optimal number
of regions of oil spill segmentation or to choose certain features,
i.e., the size of the analysis window or selected heuristic
thresholds. Further, The GA is shown to be able to identify and remove
pixels that do not significantly contribute to oil slick footprint in
SAR data. This conclusion has approved the findings of Mohanta and
Sethi (2012).</p>
      <p>The novelty of this work is designing optimization tool for the real
time oil spill automatic detection using Entropy-Based Multi-objective
Evolutionary Algorithm without involving others tool such as neural
network or any image processing classification tools. Indeed, previous
studies have executed artificial neural networks (Topouzelis et al.,
2009; Mohanta and Sethi, 2012) or post-classification techniques
(Barni et al., 1995; Calabresi et al., 1999), which are considered to
be semi-automatic techniques (Marghany, 2001). Furthermore, both
artificial neural networks and post-classification techniques are
time-consuming and the probability of misclassification does not
always decrease as the number of features increases, especially when
sample data are insufficient.</p>
      <p>Incidentally, the main objective of this work is to minimalize the
look-alike dark pixels for accurate oil spill automatic detection in
COSMO-SkyMed SAR satellite data which could be involved with oil spill
footprint was detected by entropy and genetic algorithm. The
Entropy-Based Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm uses both basic
and advanced operators. For illustrative purposes, the method has been
operated to oil spill footprint boundaries shape optimization which
allows local and global optimizations. Indeed, global optimization
which involves finding the optimal oil spill boundary shapes in
COSMO-SkyMed data. Look-alike pixels can be removed to reach the
optimal oil spill automatic shape detection.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Entropy algorithms</title>
      <p>This section describes the main equations of entropy algorithm and
entropy-based multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm (E-MMGA). These
two algorithms are used for detection of oil spill from observed SAR
satellite images.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Entropy co-occurrence algorithm</title>
      <p>Be a consequence of Harmancioglu (1981), entropy is a quantitative
compute of the information content of a series of data since reduction
of uncertainty, by making observations, equals the same amount of gain
in information. Therefore, Marghany (2001) and Marghany and van
Genderen, (2014) stated that entropy is a measure of the degree of
uncertainty of random oil spill footprint discrimination. In
a definition adopted from information theory (Cloude and Pottier,
1996), entropy is the numerical expression of oil spill footprint
boundaries in SAR images. In using this concept, oil spill footprint
can be measured indirectly based on the degree of the reduction of
multiplicative speckle noises and uncertainty of look-alike
effects. The main hypothesis is the oil spill footprint boundaries
have larger entropy compared to surrounding environment. Hence, in
order to quantitatively assess the cumulative effect of uncertainty in
oil spill footprint, entropy can be used as a metric for population
diversity of oil spill footprint boundaries which are stored at each
intersection of the column <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and row <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the various slick
areas. At the rear of Amorocho and Espildora, (1973) and Harmancioglu
(1981); Magrghany and van Genderen (2014), the uncertainty (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
associated with the oil spill pixel value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a random
variable <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is then written as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the probability distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is represented raw. The expected value of all of the entropy
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is adapted from Harmancioglu (1981) which can correlated with
the random variable <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by the following expression:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Equations (1) and (2) are expressed the probability of oil spill footprint
boundaries and its entropy in raw <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, Eq. (2) can be given
in two directions of raw <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and column <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, then the two dimensional
entropy <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Equation (3), in other words, represents the joint uncertainty associated
with oil spill footprint boundaries in two dimensional of SAR
images. It is assumed that the random variables of oil spill and
look-alikes footprint boundaries are independent then Eq. (3) can
extend as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Equation (4) can be extended to an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dimensional vector of independently
distributed of oil spill and look-alikes footprint boundaries random
variables in SAR data. Hence, in this case, the entropy <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is sum
of all of the individual SAR pixel entropies <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and can be
expressed as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          In the case of a uniform distribution of given oil spill or
look-alikes footprint boundaries, the entropy of given probability
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the number (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of homogenous clustering of the
features can be calculated (Chapman, 1986) as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The number of features (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the solution SAR image space can be
estimated based on the upper bound on the joint entropy <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
oil spill or look-alikes footprint boundary population as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Based on Eqs. (6) and (7) the entropy metric is bounded by

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Based on Eq. (8), the final entropy metric expression can by written
by combination of Eqs. (6) and (7) as follows:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is probability distribution for oil spill
footprint backscatter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in raw and column of SAR
data. If <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is stated as the continuous oil spill
backscatter variations that stick to the probability density function
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the conditional entropy can be expressed in the
form of conditional probability density function <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of two given continuous random variants of radar
backscatter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus the concept of
conditional probability density function <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Chapman, 1986) can be estimated by

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the interval change of
oil spill and look-alikes footprint backscatter, respectively.</p>
      <p>Marghany (2001); Staples and Rodrigues (2013); and Marghany and van
Genderen (2014) have proved the efficiency and validity of the entropy
on oil spill detection in SAR data. Nonetheless, this approach is
required range of threshold procedures to discriminate between oil
spill footprint quantities and surrounding environment. As a result,
the multiplicative speckle noises are not totally vanished around the
boundary of oil spill footprints. In this prospective, multi-objective
optimization algorithm can involve in entropy metric (Gunawan et al.,
2004) to preserve the diversity among different solution to minimize
the influence of the look-alikes and multiplicative speckle noise
(Lathi, 1968; Marghany, 2001; Zhang et al., 2013).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Entropy-Based Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm
(E-MMGA)</title>
      <p>Take the advantage of E-MMGA of preserving the diversity of solution
set (Gunawan et al., 2004) and solving the multidisciplinary of
uncertainty of random oil spill footprint discrimination in SAR
data. The uniqueness of this study is to deal with entropy of oil
spill detection as multi-objective Genetic Algorithm
(GA). Comprehending Coello et al. (2002), the multi-objective
optimization (MOP) has already been successfully adopted to solve
uncertainty of object detection in SAR images (Marghany, 2014a). In
general, MOP consists of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decision variable parameters, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
objective functions and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> constraints (Gunawan et al.,
2004). Multi-objective Optimization (Marghany, 2014b; Gunawan et al.,
2004) aims at conducting optimization for a range of functions as
follows

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E11"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>minimize </mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E12"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Subject to</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is SAR data and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the definition domain of
functions or the feasible region in decision space. In this research,
two objectives are considered. One is oil spill backscatter and the
other is sea surface, ship, lookalikes, and land backscatters. The
definitions of entropy of oil spill and non-oil spill footprint
boundaries are given as follows:
<list list-type="order"><list-item><p>Entropy of oil spill footprint boundaries (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
the variation of maximum entropy <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which contain oil
spill footprint boundaries
i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mfenced open="{" close="}"><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Where
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the entropy of oil spill boundaries in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> directions <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>∀</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Total of entropy of oil spill footprint boundaries is (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: the sum of entropy of the surrounding oil spill
environment in SAR data. Then the Pareto optimal solutions are
applied to retain the discrimination of oil spills entropy diversity
and surrounding entropy environment.</p></list-item></list>
Let <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SAR</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SAR</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a feasible entropy in whole SAR image. And <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is called the Pareto optimal solution in the minimization problem for
identification of oil spill pixels. if the following conditions are
satisfied (Marghany, 2014b).
<list list-type="order"><list-item><p>If <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is said to be partially greater than
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>∀</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn> 2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>∃</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn> 2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Then <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is said to be dominated by (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></list-item><list-item><p>If there is no <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>SAR</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
s.t. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dominates <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
Pareto optimal solutions for identifying entropy of oil spill
footprint boundaries <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item></list>
Following Marghany (2014b), the optimization of oil spill detection
from SAR data using entropy based MOEA E-MOEA, the entropy of oil
spill footprint boundaries must be coded into a Genetic Algorithm
syntax form i.e. the chromosome form. In this problem, the chromosome
consists of a number of genes where every gene corresponds to
a coefficient in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th-order surface fitting polynomial as given
by

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the entropy parameter coefficients
that will be estimated by the genetic algorithm to approximate the
minimum error for entropy of oil spill discrimination from surrounding
environment. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are indices of the pixel location in the
image respectively, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of coefficients (Fig. 1).</p>
      <p>Then the weighted sum to combine entropy of multiple objectives into
single objective is given by Zhou et al. (2006).

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">⋯</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
the objective functions and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the weights
of corresponding objectives that satisfy the following conditions.

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>∀</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Once the weights are determined, the searching direction is fixed. To
search Pareto optimal solutions as much as possible, the searching
directions should be changed again and again to sweep over the whole
solution space.  Therefore the weights have to be changed again and
again. The weights consist of random numbers and they are generated as
the following way (Marghany, 2014b):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E16" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>∀</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are random numbers within (0,
1). Solutions searched through changing directions are collected in
a set. Then the definition of Pareto optimal solution is applied to
determine which solutions in the set are Pareto optimal. The step
repeats in every generation in E-MOGA.</p>
      <p>To determine the diversity of entropy of multi-objectives which is
mostly more than two objectives for instance, oil spill, look-alikes,
rough sea, and low wind zone, compute the distance from a given
footprint centre to its nearest neighbour boundaries. This can be
computed by following equation adopted from Zhou et al. (2006) and
Zhang et al. (2013).

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E17" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ψ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          There are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> solutions <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sorted by
an objective in SAR space data, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the edge
distances between adjacent different oil spill and look-alike
footprint boundaries and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is set of solutions regarding oil
spill or look-alikes footprint boundaries, and

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E18"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="∥" open="∥"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E19"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            E-MMGA is run until there is no further improvement in the entropy
value (i.e., entropy is maximum), and then it is stopped. The solution
of the overall problem is obtained by taking the nondominated frontier
of the points in the grand pool of the last E-MMGA (Marghany, 2014b)
iteration (Zhang et al., 2013).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p>In this study, COSMO-SkyMed image is acquired on 29 July 2010 at
11:23:33 UTC which is implemented for oil spill detection in the Koh
Samet island, Thailand. This data covered
12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>31<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>48<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to
12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>37<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>48<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N latitude and
101<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>24<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to
101<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>33<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>37<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E longitude
(Fig. 2). According to Marghany (2014b), the oil spill has moved away
from the mainland and has started to disperse to an extent. However,
what is worrying now is that it seems to have reached a group of
islands dominated by Koh Kudee.  The stag-horn and giant clam coral
reef is dominated natural features of Koh Samet island (Fig. 2b) with
water depth less than 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depth.</p>
      <p>The Satellite has a Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) with multiple
polarization modes, including a fully polarimetric mode in which HH,
HV, VV and VH polarized data are acquired. Its meduim resolution is
5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Stripmap with the maximum coverage is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>40</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>40</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, geometric resolution is 25 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pixel
spacing is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the incident
angle is between 20 to 59<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with VV polarization
(Table 1). Figure 3 shows the COSMO-SkyMed data where the oil spill is
heading by 16.5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> towards inland within 6.59 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> length
of the island to inland (Fig. 3).</p>
      <p>Figure 4 shows the variation in the average backscatter intensity
along the oil slick footprint. The average backscatter intensity was
damped by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dB</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and decreased over time as the oil
slick footprint gradually increased (Fig. 4). Besides, the sea surface
roughness has highest backscatter values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dB</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> than oil
spill footprint pixels. Consistent with and Trivero et al. (2007) and
Marghany (2014b), oil spill changes the roughness of the ocean surface
to smoothness surface in which appears as dark footprint as compared
to the surrounding ocean (Lombardini et al., 1989; Trivero
et al., 1998; Nirchio et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2011).
Consequently, the speckle caused obstacles in dark footprint
identifications in SAR data (Marghany, 2001; Skrunes
et al., 2012). Additional, the wind speed is recorded in 29 July 2013
was ranged between 1 to 7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Besides, the measured
reductions of backscattered radar power at X-band could be impacted by
instrumental limitations, i.e. by the fact that the backscattered
radar power reaches the noise floor (Trivero et al., 2007; Marghany,
2014b).</p>
      <p>Figure 5 shows the entropy algorithm result. Clearly, the oil spill
footprint has lower entropy value of 1.5 as compared to sea roughness
and land. The land has highest entropy value of 3.5 entropy and sea
roughness has entropy value of 2.7. Indeed, non-Bragg scattering is
existing on land as backscatter becomes depolarized (Shi et al., 2008;
Skrunes et al., 2012).  Additionally, entropy algorithm has identified
oil spill footprint boundaries by entropy value of 3.3. However, land
entropy and oil spill footprint boundary having close entropy. In
fact, entropy represents the randomness of scattering mechanism (Shi
et al., 2008). According to Marghany (2001); Fukunaga (2013); and
Marghany and van Genderen (2014) entropy is measure of uniformity in
SAR image. In general, the entropy is a measure of variability or
randomness because the concentration of the backscatter changes in
relatively few locations would be non-random essentially. This
confirms the study done by Shi et al. (2008).</p>
      <p>Figure 6 shows the output result of E-MMGA. Clearly, E-MMGA is able to
produce four different segmentation boundaries. Besides Fig. 7 shows
that the thick oil spill footprint has highest E-MMGA value of 2 than
medium and light oil spill. This is mainly because each
multi-objective function in E-MMGA tends to bias its population
towards the extreme edges of the Pareto frontier. This is confirms the
work was done by Gunawan et al. (2004). Compared to entropy algorithm,
E-MMGA is able to identify the look-alike footprint boundaries and
discriminate accurately between, oil spill and look-alike, and
surrounding sea surface. E-MMGA can accurately identify the
morphological boundary of oil spill and assigned by different
segmentation layer in COSMO-SkyMed satellite data. In fact, the
Entropy-Multi-Objective Evolutionary Genetic Algorithm (E-MMGA)
provides a set of compromised solutions called Pareto optimal solution
since no single solution can optimize each of the objectives
separately. The decision maker is provided with the set of Pareto
optimal solutions in order to choose solution based on the decision
maker's criteria. This sort of E-MMGA solution technique is called
a posteriori method since decision is taken after searching is
finished. This confirms the work done by Coello et al. (2002). In this
context, the Pareto-optimization approach does not require any
a priori preference decisions between the conflicting of oil spill,
look-alike, land, and surrounding sea footprint boundaries. Further,
Pareto-optimal points have form Pareto-front as shown in Fig. 6 in the
multi-objectives function of the COSMO-SkyMed data space.</p>
      <p>Entropy-Multi-Objectives Evaluation Genetic Algorithm (E-MMGA) which
based on the Pareto optimal solutions provides excellent
discrimination of oil spill footprint boundaries. This can be
confirmed by the receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curve
(Fig. 8). In this regard, the existing of weight sum of objective
function converts a conflicting multiobjective problem of oil spill
and surrounding sea feature objectives. This can be seen in ROC curve
where oil spill has an area difference of 85 % which is larger
than look-alike and sea surface areas. Further, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> probability of
0.0005 another proof for excellent of E-MMGA for oil spill
detection. This study shows a great performance as compared to
previous work done by Marghany (2001) Shi et al. (2008); Marghany
(2014a and b). This because of Pareto-front contains the
Pareto-optimal solutions and in case of continuous front, it divides
the pixels objective function space into two parts, which are
non-optimal solutions and infeasible solutions. In this regard, it
improved the robustness of pattern search and improved the convergence
speed of MOEA.  This confirms the work of Zhang et al. (2013).</p>
      <p>On the word of Gunawan et al.,(2004), E-MMGA is able to preserve
diversity and converge as fast as most of the single-level approaches
(which are expected to be more efficient but less practical for
large-scale problems of multidisciplinary nature). Besides, it
improves overall quality of solutions by explicitly optimizing the
entropy index at every system-level iteration, and then using this
information to bias the search process toward obtaining a solution set
with maximum diversity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>This study has demonstrated work to optimize the oil spill footprint
detection in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data. Therefore,
Entropy-based Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithm (E-MMGA) has
implemented with COSMO-SkyMed data during the oil spill event along
the coastal water of along Koh Samet island, Thailand. Besides, Pareto
optimal solution is implemented with E-MMGA to minimize the
difficulties of oil spill footprint boundary detection because of the
existence of look-alike in SAR data. The study shows that the
implementation of Pareto optimal solution and weight sum in E-MMGA
generated accurate pattern of oil slick. Furthermore, thick oil spill
has highest value of 2 E-MMGA than thin and medium spills. The E-MMGA,
is able to preserve the morphology of oil spill footprint boundaries
i.e. thick, medium, and light. In addition, the receive-operational
characteristics (ROC) curve confirmed accurately performance of E-MMGA
with 85 % oil spill detection, 10 % for look-alike and 5 %
for surrounding sea surface boundary identification. In conclusion,
E-MMGA is considered as excellent algorithm to discriminate oil spill
from look-alikes and also to identify thick oil spill from thin one.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The author would like to thank Geo-informatics and Space Technology
Development Agency (GISTDA) of Thailand for providing COSMO-SkyMed data</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation> Amorocho, J. and Espildora, B.: Entropy in the assessment
of uncertainty in hydrologic systems and models, Water Resour. Res.,
9, 1511–1522, 1973.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation> Barni, M., Betti, M., and Mecocci, A.: A fuzzy approach to
oil spill detection an SAR images, International Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Symposium, 1995, IGARSS'95, “Quantitative Remote Sensing for
Science and Applications”,  157–159,
1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation> Calabresi, G., Del Frate, F., Lichtenegger, J.,
Petrocchi, A., and Trivero, P.: Neural networks for the oil spill
detection using ERS-SAR data, IEEE 1999 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Symposium, 1999, IGARSS'99 Proceedings,
215–217, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation> Chapman, T. G.: Entropy as a measure of hydrologic data
uncertainty and model performance, J. Hydrol., 85, 111–126,
1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation> Cloude, S. R. and Pottier, E.: A review of target
decomposition theorems in radar polarimetry, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote,
34, 498–518, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation> Coello, C. A. C., Van Veldhuizen, D. A., and
Lamont, G. B.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective
Problems, Springer, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation> Fukunaga, K.: Introduction to Statistical Pattern
Recognition, Academic Press, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation> Garcia-Pineda, O., MacDonald, I. R., Li, X.,
Jackson, C. R., and Pichel, W. G.: Oil spill mapping and measurement
in the Gulf of Mexico with Textural Classifier Neural Network
Algorithm (TCNNA), IEEE J. Sel.  Top. Appl., 6, 2517–2525,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation> Gunawan, S., Farhang-Mehr, A., and Azarm, S.: On
maximizing solution diversity in a multiobjective multidisciplinary
genetic algorithm for design optimization, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation> Harmancioglu, N.: Measuring the information content of
hydrological processes by the entropy concept, Centennial of
Ataturk's Birth, Journal of the Civil Engineering Faculty of Ege
University, 12, 13–88,
1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation> Lathi, B. P.: An introduction to random signals and
communication theory, 1968.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation> Liu, P., Li, X., Qu, J. J., Wang, W., Zhao, C., and
Pichel, W.: Oil spill detection with fully polarimetric UAVSAR data,
Mar. Pollut. Bull., 62, 2611–2618, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation> Lombardini, P., Fiscella, B., Trivero, P., Cappa, C., and
Garrett, W.: Modulation of the spectra of short gravity waves by sea
surface films: slick detection and characterization with a microwave
probe, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 6, 882–890, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation> Marghany, M.: Utilization of a genetic algorithm for the
automatic detection of oil spill from RADARSAT-2 SAR satellite data,
Mar. Pollut. Bull., 89, 20–29, 2014a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation> Marghany, M.: Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for
oil spill detection from COSMO-SkeyMed satellite, in: Computational
Science and Its Applications–ICCSA 2014, Springer, 355–371,
2014b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation> Marghany, M. and van Genderen, J.: Entropy algorithm for
automatic detection of oil spill from radarsat-2 SAR data, IOP
Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 012051,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation> Minchew, B., Jones, C. E., and Holt, B.: Polarimetric
analysis of backscatter from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill using
L-band synthetic aperture radar, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 50,
3812–3830, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation> Mohanta, R. K. and Sethi, B.: A review of genetic
algorithm application for image segmentation, International Journal
of Computer Technology &amp; Applications, 3, 720–723, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation> Nirchio, F., Sorgente, M., Giancaspro, A., Biamino, W.,
Parisato, E., Ravera, R., and Trivero, P.: Automatic detection of
oil spills from SAR images, Int. J. Remote Sens., 26, 1157–1174,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation> Shi, L., Zhao, C., Fan, K., Shi, Y., and Liu, P.: Texture
feature application in oil spill detection by satellite data,
Congress on Image and Signal Processing, 2008, CISP'08, 784–788,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation> Skrunes, S., Brekke, C., and Eltoft, T.: An experimental
study on oil spill characterization by multi-polarization SAR, 9th
European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, 2012, EUSAR,
139–142, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Staples, G. and Rodrigues, D. F.: Maritime environmental
surveillance with RADARSAT-2, Anais XVI Simpósio Brasileiro de
Sensoriamento Remoto – SBSR, Foz do Iguaçu, PR, Brasil, 13–18
april 2013, INPE, available at:
<uri>http://www.dsr.inpe.br/sbsr2013/files/p1061.pdf</uri>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation> Topouzelis, K., Stathakis, D., and Karathanassi, V.:
Investigation of genetic algorithms contribution to feature
selection for oil spill detection, Int. J. Remote Sens., 30,
611–625, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Trivero, P., Fiscella, B., Gomez, F., and Pavese, P.: SAR detection
and characterization of sea surface slicks, Int. J. Remote Sens.,
19, 543–548, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation> Trivero, P., Biamino, W., and Nirchio, F.: High
resolution COSMO-SkyMed SAR images for oil spills automatic
detection, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Symposium, 2007, IGARSS 2007, 2–5, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, B., Perrie, W., Li, X., and Pichel, W. G.: Mapping sea surface oil slicks using RADARSAT-2 quad-polarization SAR image, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 1–5,
doi:10.1029/2011GL047013, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation> Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Ji, G., and Dong, Z.: Genetic pattern search and its
application to brain image classification, Math. Probl. Eng., 1–8, doi:10.1155/2013/580876, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation> Zhou, A., Jin, Y., Zhang, Q., Sendhoff, B., and
Tsang, E.: Combining model-based and genetics-based offspring
generation for multi-objective optimization using a convergence
criterion, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2006, CEC
2006, 892–899, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

<table-wrap id="App1.Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Characteristics of COSMO-SkyMed used.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mode</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Resolution (m)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Polarization</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Stripmap</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">VV</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Coding scheme of the coefficients of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th-order surface
fitting polynomial into the chromosome syntax form.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1263/2015/osd-12-1263-2015-f01.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Oil spill covers beach of <bold>(a)</bold> Koh Samet Island and
<bold>(b)</bold> Google map of Koh Samet Island.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1263/2015/osd-12-1263-2015-f02.jpg"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F3"><caption><p>COSMO-SkyMed data along Koh Samet island, Thailand.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1263/2015/osd-12-1263-2015-f03.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Average backscatter variations in COSMO-SkyMed.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1263/2015/osd-12-1263-2015-f04.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Entropy result for oil spill footprint.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1263/2015/osd-12-1263-2015-f05.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F6"><caption><p>E-MMGA solution for oil spill discrimination in COSMO-SkyMed.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1263/2015/osd-12-1263-2015-f06.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Oil spill footprint Category by E-MMGA. </p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1263/2015/osd-12-1263-2015-f07.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App1.Ch1.F8"><caption><p>ROC for oil spill discrimination using E-MMGA.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/preprints/12/1263/2015/osd-12-1263-2015-f08.png"/>

    </fig>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
