References

Ocean Science

Ocean Sci.

1812-0792

Copernicus Publications

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/os-3-321-2007

On the assimilation of ice velocity and concentration data into large-scale sea ice models

Dulière

¹ Fichefet

Université Catholique de Louvain, Institut d'Astronomie et de Géophysique Georges Lemaître, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

08 06 2007

3 2 321 335

2007

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 Generic License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/

This article is available from https://os.copernicus.org/articles/3/321/2007/os-3-321-2007.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://os.copernicus.org/articles/3/321/2007/os-3-321-2007.pdf

Data assimilation into sea ice models designed for climate studies has started about 15 years ago. In most of the studies conducted so far, it is assumed that the improvement brought by the assimilation is straightforward. However, some studies suggest this might not be true. In order to elucidate this question and to find an appropriate way to further assimilate sea ice concentration and velocity observations into a global sea ice-ocean model, we analyze here results from a number of twin experiments (i.e. experiments in which the assimilated data are model outputs) carried out with a simplified model of the Arctic sea ice pack. Our objective is to determine to what degree the assimilation of ice velocity and/or concentration data improves the global performance of the model and, more specifically, reduces the error in the computed ice thickness. A simple optimal interpolation scheme is used, and outputs from a control run and from perturbed experiments without and with data assimilation are thoroughly compared. Our results indicate that, under certain conditions depending on the assimilation weights and the type of model error, the assimilation of ice velocity data enhances the model performance. The assimilation of ice concentration data can also help in improving the model behavior, but it has to be handled with care because of the strong connection between ice concentration and ice thickness. This study is first step towards real data assimilation into NEMO-LIM, a global sea ice-ocean model.

References 1

Arbetter, T., Lynch, A., Maslanik, J., and Meier, W.: Effects of data assimilation of ice motion in a basin-scale sea ice model, Ice in the Environment: Proceedings of the 16th IAHR International Symposium on Ice, Dunedin, New Zealand, 2–6 December 2002, International Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Research, edited by: Squire, V. and Langhore, P., 3, 186–193, 2002.

Bj\orgo, E., Johannessen, O., and Miles, M.: Analysis of merged SMMR/SSMI time series of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice parameters, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 413–416, 1997.

Bourke, R. and Garrett, R.: Sea ice thickness distribution in the Arctic Ocean, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 13, 259–280, 1987.

Cavalieri, D., Gloersen, P., Parkinson, J., Comiso, J., and Zwally, H.: Observed hemispheric asymmetry in global sea ice changes, Science, 278, 1104–1106, 1997.

Cavalieri, D., Parkinson, C., and Vinnikov, K.: 30-Year satellite record reveals contrasting Arctic and Antarctic decadal sea ice variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018031, 2003.

Comiso, J.: Bootstrap sea ice concentrations for NIMBUS-7 SMMR and DMSP SSM/I, National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, CO, USA, digital media, 1999.

Comiso, J.: A rapidly declining perennial sea ice cover in the Arctic, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 1956, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015650, 2002.

Comiso, J. and Steffen, J.: Studies of Antarctic sea ice concentrations from satellite data and their applications, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 31 361–31 385, 2001.

Dai, M., Arbetter, T., and Meier, W.: Data assimilation of sea-ice motion vectors: Sensitivity to the parameterization of sea-ice strength, Ann. Glaciol., 44, 357–360, 2006.

Emery, W., Fowler, C., and Maslanik, J.: Satellite-derived maps of Arctic and Antarctic sea ice motion: 1988 to 1994, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 897–900, 1997.

Fichefet, T., Tartinville, B., and Goosse, H.: Antarctic sea ice variability during 1958–1999 : A simulation with a global ice-ocean model, J. Geophys. Res., 108(C3), 3102, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001148-12, 2003.

Fowler, C. and Emery, W. and Maslanik, J.: Satellite-derived evolution of Arctic sea ice ages: October 1978 to March 2003, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensor Letters, 1, 2, 71–74,2004.

Fox, A., Haines, K., de~Cuevas, B., and Webb, D.: Altimeter assimilation in the OCCAM global model, Part I : A twin experiment, J. Mar. Syst., 26, 303–320., 2000.

Ghil, M. and Malanotte-Rizzoli, P.: Data assimilation in meteorology and oceanography, Adv. Geophys., 33, 141–266, 1991.

Goosse, H.: Modelling the large-scale behaviour of the coupled ocean-sea ice system, Ph.D. thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 1997.

Hibler: A dynamic thermodynamic sea ice model, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 9, 815–846, 1979.

Holloway, G. and Sou, T.: Has Arctic sea ice rapidly thinned?, J. Climate, 15, 1691–1701, 2002.

Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Jenne, R., and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 77(3), 437–471, 1996.

Köberle, C. and Gerdes, R.: Mechanisms determining the variability of the Arctic sea ice conditions and export, J. Climate, 16, 2843–2858, 2003.

Kreyscher, M., Harder, M., Lemke, P., and Flato, G.: Results of the Sea Ice Model Intercomparison Project : Evaluation of sea ice rheology schemes for use in climate simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 11 299–11 320, 2000.

Kwok, R., Zwally, H., and Yi, D.: ICEsat observations of Arctic sea ice: a first look, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, 16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020309, 2004.

Laxon, S., Peacock, N., and Smith, D.: High interannual variability of sea ice thickness in the Arctic region, Nature, 425, 947–950, 2003.

Lin, C.-L., Chai, T., and Sun, J.: Retrieval of flow structures in a convective boundary layer using an adjoint model : identical twin experiments, J. Atmos. Sci., 58, 1767–1783, 2001.

Lindsay, R. and Zhang, J.: The thinning of Arctic sea ice, 1988–2003: have we passed a tipping point?, J. Climate, 18, 4879–4894, 2005.

Lindsay, R. and Zhang, J.: Assimilation of ice concentration in an ice-ocean model, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 23, 742–749, 2006.

Lindsay, R., Zhang, J., and Rothrock, D.: Sea ice deformation rates from measurements and in a model, Atmos.-Oceans, 40, 35–47, 2003.

Lisaeter, K., Rosanova, J., and Evensen, G.: Assimilation of ice concentration in a coupled ice-ocean model, using the Ensemble Kalman Filter, Ocean Dyn., 53, 368–388, 2003.

Maslowski, W., Newton, B., Schlosser, P., Semtner, A., and Martinson, D.: Modeling recent climate variability in the Arctic Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3743–3746, 2000.

McPhee, M.: An analysis of pack ice drift in summer, in: Sea Ice Processes and Models, edited by: Pritchard, R. S., Univ. Wash. Press, Seattle, pp 62–75, 1980.

Meier, W. and Maslanik, J.: Synoptic-scale ice-motion case-studies using assimilated motion fields, Ann. Glaciol., 33, 145–150, 2001a.

Meier, W. and Maslanik, J.: Improved sea ice parcel trajectories in the Arctic via data assimilation, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 42, 506–512, 2001b.

Meier, W. and Maslanik, J.: Effect of environmental conditions on observed, modeled, and assimilated sea ice motion errors, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 21.1–21.11, 2003.

Meier, W., Maslanik, J., and Fowler, C.: Error analysis and assimilation of remotely sensed ice motion within an Arctic sea ice model, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 3339–3356, 2000.

Parkinson, C. and Washington, W.: A large-scale numerical model of sea ice, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 311–337, 1979.

Parkinson, C., Cavalieri, D., Gloersen, P., Zwally, H., and Comiso, J.: Arctic sea ice extents, areas, and trends, 1978–1996, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 20 837–20 856, 1999.

Perovich, D. and Grenfell, T. and Richter-Menge, J. and Light, B. and Tucker III, W. and Eicken, H.: Thin and thinner: sea ice mass balance measurements during SHEBA, J. Geophys. Res., 108(C3), 8050, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001079, 2003.

Rigor, I. and Wallace, J.: Variations in the age of Arctic seaice and summer seaice extent, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L09401, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019492, 2004.

Rothrock, D. and Zhang, J.: Arctic Ocean sea ice volume: What explains its recent depletion?, J. Geophys. Res., 110(C1), C01002, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002282, 2005.

Rothrock, D. and Zhang, J. and Yu, Y.: The Arctic ice thickness anomaly of the 1990s: A consistent view from observations and models, J. Geophys. Res., 108(C3), 3083, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001208, 2003.

Rothrock, D., Yu, Y., and Maykut, G.: Thinning of the arctic sea-ice cover, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 3469–3472, 1999.

Semtner, A.: A model of the thermodynamic growth of sea ice in numerical investigations of climate, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 6, 379–389, 1976.

Smolarkiewicz, P.: A simple positive definite advection scheme with small implicit diffusion, Mon. Wea. Rev., 111, 479–486, 1983.

Steele, M., Morley, R., and Ermold, W.: PHC: A global ocean hydrography with a high quality Arctic Ocean, J. Climate, 14, 2079–2087, 2001.

Steffen, H. and Schweiger, A.: Nasa team algorithm for sea ice concentration retrieval from Defense Meteorological Satellite Program Special Sensor Microwave Imager: Comparison with Landsat Imagery, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 21 971–21 987, 1991.

Thomas, D. and Rothrock, D.: Blending Sequential Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer and buoy data into a sea ice model, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 10 907–10 920, 1989.

Thomas, D. and Rothrock, D.: The Arctic ocean ice balance : a Kalman smoother estimate, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 10 053–10 067, 1993.

Thomas, D., Martin, S., Rothrock, D., and Steele, M.: Assimilating satellite concentration data into an Arctic sea ice mass balance model, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 20 849–20 868, 1996.

Thorndike, A.: A naive zero-dimensional sea ice model, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 5 093–5 099, 1975.

Timmermann, R., Goosse, H., Madec, G., Fichefet, T., Ethe, C., and Duliere, V.: On the representation of high latitude processes in the ORCALIM global coupled sea ice-ocean model, Ocean Model., 8, 175–201, 2005.

Trenberth, K., Olson, J., and Large, W.: A global ocean wind stress climatology based on the ECMWF analyses, Tech. rep., National Center for Atmospheric Research Technical Note 338, 1989.

Tucker, W., Weatherly, J., Eppler, D., Farmer, D., and Bentley, D.: Evidence for rapid thinning of sea ice in the western Arctic Ocean at the end of the 1980s, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 2851–2854, 2001.

Weaver, R., Steffen, K., Heinrichs, J., Maslanik, J., and Flato, G.: Data assimilation in sea-ice monitoring, International Glaciology Society, 31, 327–332, 2000.

Winsor, P.: Arctic sea ice thickness remained constant during the 1990s, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1039–1041, 2001.

Yu, Y. and Maykut, G. and Rothrock, D.: Changes in the thickness distribution of the Arctic sea ice between 1958–1970 and 1993–1997, J. Geophys. Res., 109, C08004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001982, 2004.

Yu, Y. and Lindsay, R.: Comparisons of thin ice fractions estimated from RGPS and AVHRR, J. Geophys. Res., 108(C12), 3387, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001319, 2003.

Zhang, J., Thomas, D., Rothrock, D., Lindsay, R., and Yu, Y.: Assimilation of ice motion observations and comparisons with submarine ice thickness data, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 1–18, 2003.