<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">OS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Ocean Science</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">OS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ocean Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1812-0792</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/os-21-2727-2025</article-id><title-group><article-title>Cold lenses in the Amundsen Sea: impacts of sea ice formation  on subsurface pH and carbon</article-title><alt-title>Cold lenses in the Amundsen Sea</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Pickup</surname><given-names>Daisy D.</given-names></name>
          <email>d.pickup@uea.ac.uk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0003-7607</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bakker</surname><given-names>Dorothee C. E.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9234-5337</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Heywood</surname><given-names>Karen J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9859-0026</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Glassup</surname><given-names>Francis</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Hammermeister</surname><given-names>Emily M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1739-761X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Stammerjohn</surname><given-names>Sharon E.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1697-8244</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>Gareth A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Loucaides</surname><given-names>Socratis</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Queste</surname><given-names>Bastien Y.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3786-2275</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Webber</surname><given-names>Benjamin G. M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8812-5929</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Yager</surname><given-names>Patricia L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Centre for Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>School of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Ocean Technology and Engineering, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Department of Marine Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Daisy D. Pickup (d.pickup@uea.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>30</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>21</volume>
      <issue>6</issue>
      <fpage>2727</fpage><lpage>2741</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>May</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>3</day><month>June</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11</day><month>September</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day><month>September</month><year>2025</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2025 Daisy D. Pickup et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/21/2727/2025/os-21-2727-2025.html">This article is available from https://os.copernicus.org/articles/21/2727/2025/os-21-2727-2025.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/21/2727/2025/os-21-2727-2025.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://os.copernicus.org/articles/21/2727/2025/os-21-2727-2025.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e208">The Amundsen Sea polynya hosts intense sea ice formation, but, due to the presence of relatively warm and salty modified Circumpolar Deep Water, the cold, brine-enriched water is not typically dense enough to sink to the deep ocean. A hydrographic survey of the Dotson Ice Shelf region in the Amundsen Sea using two ocean gliders identified and characterised subsurface lenses containing water with temperatures less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.70 °C. These lenses, located at depths between 240 to 500 m, were colder, saltier and denser than the overlying Winter Water (WW) layer. The pH of the lenses was 7.99, lower than WW by 0.02 and the dissolved inorganic carbon concentration was higher in the lenses than WW by approximately 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<sup>−1</sup>. The lenses were associated with a dissolved oxygen concentration greater than surrounding water at the same depth and density due to the cold temperatures increasing O<sub>2</sub> solubility. We hypothesise that these lenses are a product of wintertime surface cooling and brine rejection in areas with intense sea ice formation. They may form in shallow regions, potentially around the Martin Peninsula and Bear Island, where intense upper ocean heat loss occurs, and then spill off into the deeper Dotson-Getz Trough to reach their neutrally-buoyant depth. This is supported by wintertime temperature and salinity observations. This study highlights the importance of shallow parts of shelf seas for generating cold dense water masses in the warm sector of Antarctica. These lenses are widespread in the region of the Dotson-Getz Trough and have the potential to sequester carbon deeper than typical in the region, alongside cooling the water impinging on the Dotson ice shelf base.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Natural Environment Research Council</funding-source>
<award-id>NE/S006419/1</award-id>
<award-id>NE/J005703/1</award-id>
<award-id>NE/JOO5649/1</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>National Science Foundation</funding-source>
<award-id>1738992</award-id>
<award-id>1941483</award-id>
<award-id>1941327</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e258">Polynyas are referred to as “sea ice factories”, as 10 % of Southern Ocean sea ice is formed within major coastal polynyas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.1"/>. Coastal polynyas are formed by katabatic winds that push sea ice away from the coast; the newly exposed surface water cools and refreezes before being blown offshore, continually generating open areas for new ice formation during winter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.2"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. When sea ice forms, it releases salt into the surrounding water through brine rejection. Alongside intense surface heat loss, sea ice formation leads to dense water that will sink once it reaches a sufficient density. During sea ice formation, dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) is rejected alongside salt <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.3"/>, so the remaining dense brine is CO<sub>2</sub>-rich. When this dense brine sinks, it removes DIC from the surface ocean and sequesters carbon in the deep ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.4"/>. This has been observed in tank experiments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.5"/> and in situ in the Weddell Sea <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.6"/>, where the partial pressure of CO<sub>2</sub> in brine was oversaturated relative to the atmosphere.</p>
      <p id="d2e300">The Amundsen Sea polynya is the fourth largest annual cumulative producer of sea ice among Antarctic polynyas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.7"/>. This sea ice formation primarily occurs in the Dotson Ice Shelf (DIS) region in shallower water (approximately 300–400 m) to the east of the eastern branch of the Dotson-Getz Trough <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.8"><named-content content-type="post">Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/></named-content></xref>. In summer, the region is highly stratified with lighter Antarctic Surface Water (AASW) and Winter Water (WW) overlying dense modified Circumpolar Deep Water (mCDW). Typical properties of WW are a minimum conservative temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.8  to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.6 °C and absolute salinities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ranging from 34.05 to 34.15 g kg<sup>−1</sup>. WW is identified as the temperature-minimum layer and is the remnant of the winter mixed layer. The surface water mass, AASW, is warmed by solar heating and freshened by sea ice melt in summer with temperatures above those of the WW layer and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> less than 34 g kg<sup>−1</sup>. The mCDW (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than 0 °C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than 34.8 g kg<sup>−1</sup>) intrudes onto the continental shelf of the Amundsen Sea from the open Southern Ocean, following the troughs to the ice shelves where it contributes to basal melting <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.9"><named-content content-type="post">Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/></named-content></xref>. The presence of this mCDW, along with the insufficiently dense water in the Amundsen Sea polynya, inhibits the full-depth convection seen in other polynyas that leads to the formation of Dense Shelf Water <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.10"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. This has been suggested to make the Amundsen Sea inefficient in contributing to carbon sequestration through the biological and sea ice carbon pumps which aim to transfer dissolved organic and inorganic carbon to the deep ocean. Instead carbon in the Amundsen Sea remains above the mCDW where it is subject to transportation with mid-depth currents <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.11"/>. While the absence of Antarctic Bottom Water formation in the Amundsen Sea is understood, the impact and fate of the dense water generated by persistent sea ice formation in the polynya during winter are not. A recent review on Antarctic polynyas by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.12"/> highlighted that many gaps in understanding processes in polynyas –  including the role of long-term carbon sequestration in the Amundsen Sea – stem from limited observations.</p>
      <p id="d2e428">Studies in the Amundsen Sea polynya have been limited in the past due to its remoteness and lack of access as a result of extensive sea ice. The highest spatial resolution study of the Amundsen Sea polynya to date was the Amundsen Sea Polynya International Research Expedition (ASPIRE) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.13"/> in which the stratified water mass structure was described <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.14"/>. From a carbonate chemistry perspective, the main focus of ASPIRE was the surface ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.15"/> and biological carbon export <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.16"/>. Other campaigns in the region focused on the circulation of water towards and under the ice shelves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.17"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g</named-content></xref> and meltwater transport from the basally-melting ice shelves <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.18"/>. There is a clear gap in our understanding of subsurface water column dynamics concerning carbonate chemistry in the Amundsen Sea polynya. Currently, no studies investigate the fate of WW or examine the water masses above mCDW beyond the front of DIS.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e455">Map of the study region within the Amundsen Sea polynya. Arrows indicate the pathway of mCDW following the Dotson-Getz Trough <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.19"/>. Contours show BedMachine v3 bathymetry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.20"/>. The purple box indicates the boundaries of the glider transect map in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>c. The dashed blue line represents the area of sea ice production and the dashed green line shows the location of permanent fast ice, both shown in Fig. 3 of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.21"/>.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/21/2727/2025/os-21-2727-2025-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e475">Higher resolution studies for both physical and biogeochemical properties can be achieved using autonomous underwater vehicles, such as gliders. Unlike most ship-based surveys, the high horizontal spatial resolution of glider observations allows the characterisation of subsurface features on the mesoscale. The Rossby radius in this region is less than 10 km <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.22"/>, so mesoscale features, such as eddies and meanders, are only a few kilometres in radius. Gliders have been used previously on the West Antarctic Peninsula to detect eddies on the order of 10 km in diameter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.23"/>. With biogeochemical sensors, including a novel pH sensor, we identify the properties of observed mesoscale features in the Amundsen Sea, and discuss their formation. Supporting data include temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen (O<sub>2</sub>), the ratio of oxygen-18 to oxygen-16 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O) and DIC measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Seagliders</title>
      <p id="d2e519">Two University of East Anglia Seagliders were used in the southern Amundsen Sea polynya in January and February 2022 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>). They were deployed from the Research Vessel Icebreaker <italic>Nathaniel B. Palmer</italic> (NBP). This campaign (NBP22-02) was part of the International Thwaites Glacier Collaboration: Thwaites-Amundsen Regional Survey and Network (ITGC: TARSAN) and Accelerating Thwaites Ecosystem Impacts for the Southern Ocean (ARTEMIS) projects. Seaglider 579 (SG579) was deployed approximately 10 km north of DIS on 21 January 2022, completing three circuits of a box (approximately 40 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 km) in front of DIS, before heading north to 73.41° S  114.24° W, where it was recovered on 21 February 2022. SG579 carried out 247 dives to the seabed, or a maximum depth of 1000 m. Seaglider 510 (SG510) was deployed in open water on 17 January 2022 at 73.81° S 112.61° W and headed south, following the eastern branch of the Dotson-Getz Trough (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>), in a straight transect to 74.17° S before following the trough northwest to 73.23° S 114.34° W, then south towards Martin Peninsula, crossing the Dotson-Getz Trough, where data collection ceased on 4 February 2022. Prior to communication loss, SG510 transmitted a total of 143 dives to the seabed (up to 1000 m).</p>
      <p id="d2e536">Temperature and conductivity sensors (Sea-Bird CT Sail) were integrated on both Seagliders with sampling intervals of 5 s which corresponded to a measurement approximately every 0.5–1 m (dependent upon glider vertical speed). The raw outputs were processed using the UEA Seaglider Toolbox <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.24"/> which incorporates corrections for the thermal lag of the un-pumped conductivity cell that can produce artificial salinity spikes following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.25"/>. The mean difference and root mean squared difference between the processed and raw versions of salinity measurements were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0011 and 0.0075, respectively for SG579 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.0012 and 0.0123, respectively for SG510. In situ temperature and practical salinity were converted to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, using TEOS-10 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.26"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e581">An Aanderaa O<sub>2</sub> optode was integrated on SG510 and was lag-corrected using the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.27"/>. The raw measurements were calibrated against an O<sub>2</sub> SBE 43 sensor mounted on the ship's Conductivity-Temperature-Depth (CTD) rosette which itself had been calibrated against discrete water samples for O<sub>2</sub> (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>). To calibrate the glider-measured O<sub>2</sub>, six dives were compared with eight CTD casts that were taken within 3 km of the glider profiles. Only measurements at depths greater than 500 m were compared, so that upper ocean influence of biological activity was excluded. The glider O<sub>2</sub> measurements were on average 7.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L<sup>−1</sup> lower than the CTD O<sub>2</sub> sensor measurements, so this offset was applied. This correction is small relative to the magnitude of the O<sub>2</sub> differences observed between the features discussed in this paper and the surrounding waters. The saturation concentration (DO<sub>sat</sub>) of O<sub>2</sub> was first calculated following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.28"/> using in situ temperature and salinity. This was then converted to percent saturation: O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> DO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>(DO<sub>sat</sub>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100, where DO is the in situ O<sub>2</sub> concentration measured by the optode. For temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen measurements from the gliders, both ascent and descent profiles are utilised.</p>
      <p id="d2e745">A Lab-on-Chip pH sensor developed by the National Oceanography Centre Southampton <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.29"/>, was additionally integrated into SG579. It had a sampling interval of approximately 10 min and determined pH on the total hydrogen scale  spectrophotometrically <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.30"/>. For pH, only measurements taken during the ascent are reported in this study due to the nature of the glider flight which was programmed to travel relatively slowly during the ascent at a vertical speed of 0.09 m s<sup>−1</sup>, yielding a higher vertical resolution of pH measurements. Final pH values were corrected using in situ temperature, salinity and pressure after calculating the temperature difference between inside the sensor and in situ water following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.31"/>. The pH measurements are reported with an accuracy better than 0.014 and a precision of 0.001 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.32"/>. The pH sensor stopped recording data on 8 February 2022, after 146 dives of successful data collection.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>CTD casts and discrete samples</title>
      <p id="d2e780">The CTD sensor on the RVIB <italic>Nathaniel B. Palmer</italic> is a Seabird SBE 911+ that takes continuous measurements. The CTD was calibrated post-cruise and the corrections were negligible, within the reported accuracy of the sensors (0.001 °C and 0.0003 S m<sup>−1</sup>). Also mounted on the CTD rosette was a dissolved O<sub>2</sub> sensor (SBE43) which was post processed in SeaSoft with time lag and hysteresis corrections applied. It was corrected for an offset of 3.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L<sup>−1</sup> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L<sup>−1</sup>) based on comparisons between the sensor and Winkler titrated bottle data at depths greater than 500 m <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.33"/>. Water samples for DIC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O were collected from Niskin bottles mounted on the CTD rosette. Samples for DIC were collected in 500 mL borosilicate bottles following SOP1 from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.34"/>. They were analysed at the University of Georgia using a Single Operator Multi-parameter Metabolic Analyser attached to a UIC CM5011 CO<sub>2</sub> Coulometer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.35"/>. Accuracy is based on calibration to two daily certified reference material (CRM) runs, with the average adjustment being 0.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05  %. Precision based on duplicate runs of CRMs was 0.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<sup>−1</sup>. Precision based on duplicate samples (repeatability) was 0.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<sup>−1</sup>. Water samples for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O were collected from Niskin bottles mounted on the CTD rosette in 20 mL glass scintillation vials, sealed with poly-seal caps and secured with electrical tape to prevent loosening during storage and shipping. Samples were analysed at the British Geological Survey in the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Stable Isotope Facility using the CO<sub>2</sub> equilibration method with an Isoprime 100 mass spectrometer plus Aquaprep device. Isotope measurements were calibrated against internal and international standards including VSMOW2 and VSLAP2. Based on duplicate analysis, analytical reproducibility was better than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for all samples.</p>
      <p id="d2e978">Measurements for DIC from the ASPIRE campaign are those presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.36"/>. The samples were collected between December 2010 and January 2011 and calibrated against CRMs. For further information on collection and analysis see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.37"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Stable oxygen isotopes and estimating Meteoric and Sea-Ice Melt Fractions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">met</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sim</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d2e1018">The depth-discrete oxygen isotope values (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O), along with CTD-observed absolute salinity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), were used to estimate vertical profiles of meteoric and sea-ice melt fractions. To do this, the net freshwater balance is partitioned between the total inputs from all meteoric sources (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">met</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, precipitation and glacial discharge in the form of melting ice shelves and icebergs) and the input/extraction due to sea ice melt/formation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sim</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.38"/>, we use a three end member mass balance approach <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.39"/>, employing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O as tracers. This approach assumes that the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O values in the water column have resulted from a mixture of sea ice melt, meteoric inputs, and the source water mCDW, all three of which have well-separated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O values in pure “end member” form. Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.40"/>, end members for mCDW and meteoric water were empirically determined based on the mCDW–glacial meltwater mixing line, also known as the Gade line <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.41"/>, using all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O observations below the winter mixed layer (Winter Water core, identified by the temperature minimum); the extrapolated salinity maximum defined the mCDW end member (34.83 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O), while the zero-salinity intercept defined the meteoric end member (0.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O). The sea ice end member (7.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O) is based on field observations reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.42"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Seal tags</title>
      <p id="d2e1274">This study makes use of a combined austral wintertime (April to September) temperature and salinity dataset (3457 vertical profiles) obtained from 15 seal-borne conductivity-temperature-depth-satellite relayed data loggers (CTD-SRDLs) deployed in the Amundsen Sea in 2014 and 2022. This combined hydrographic dataset was collected by 9 Southern Elephant seals (Mirounga leonina) and 7 Weddell seals (Leptonychotes weddellii). The 2014 hydrographic dataset (1906 profiles) was collected by CTD-SRDLs deployed as part of the UK’s Ice Sheet Stability Programme (iSTAR) Ocean2Ice JR294 cruise in February 2014 onboard the RRS James Clark Ross <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.43"/>. The 2022 hydrographic dataset (9 tagged seals; 1551 profiles) was collected from CTD-SRDLs deployed during the NBP22-02 cruise onboard the RVIB <italic>Nathaniel B. Palmer</italic>, as part of TARSAN.</p>
      <p id="d2e1283">Due to the limited transmission bandwidth of the Argos satellite system, CTD-SRDLs only send measurements from 17 to 18 pre-defined depths, transmitting only the deepest ascent in every 4 to 6 h window <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.44"/>. This study accesses the seal-borne CTD-SRDLs profiles via the Marine Mammals Exploring the Oceans Pole to Pole (MEOP) server which applies standard delayed-mode quality control and vertically interpolates profiles to 1 m (for details see: <uri>https://www.meop.net/database/data-processing-and-validation.html</uri>, last access: 1 December 2024). Before use in this study, profiles were further calibrated against concurrent summertime ship-based hydrography and historical (1994–2020) profiles from the MIPkit-A dataset  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.45"/>. Calibration offsets for temperature and salinity were calculated manually for each CTD-SRDL following comparisons with regional observations of mCDW properties, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than 0 °C at depths greater than 700 m. CTD-SRDL GPS coordinates were adjusted using standard repositioning algorithms derived using a Kalman smoother <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.46"/>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Location of lenses</title>
      <p id="d2e1321">Analysis of the water masses in temperature-salinity space reveals two distinct salinity ranges  where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.60 °C (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). The more saline water mass (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than 34.2 g kg<sup>−1</sup>) is denser with temperatures closer to the freezing line (as calculated using TEOS-10 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.47"/>). The less saline water mass (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> less than 34.2 g kg<sup>−1</sup>) is the WW layer that lies immediately below the AASW (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a and b), with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 34.05 and 34.15 g kg<sup>−1</sup> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). The colder and more saline water appears as isolated patches within the subsurface water column, below the WW layer (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a and b). Such localised subsurface bodies of water with distinct physical and chemical properties are commonly referred to as lenses, for example meddies found in the Northeast Atlantic emanating from the Mediterranean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx1" id="paren.48"/>. For the purpose of this study, this terminology will be adopted to describe these isolated, cold features. The lenses are located in the stratified layer at approximate depths of 200 to 500 m between the warmer of the two temperature minima of WW and the warmer deeper mCDW, the deepest water mass (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a and b). The mCDW has <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> above 0.35 °C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than 34.72 g kg<sup>−1</sup> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>), which agrees well with previous in situ observations in the Dotson region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx47" id="paren.49"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1461">In total, ten lenses are identified from the glider transects (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>). The lenses vary in apparent size, with the largest horizontal extent, as captured by the glider, reaching a maximum of 25 km and the smallest being approximately 5 km. All of the lenses are in locations where the total water column depth is greater than 500 m and, with the exception of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, all of the lenses are located in water with depths greater than 600 m. Two of the lenses (A and B) are located at approximately 73.9° S, within 25 km from each other and were captured 8 d apart (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a and b). We argue that A and B are the same lens and the differences in size could be due to the glider crossing either the centre of the lens, or an edge. This is supported by the comparison of the core lens properties to the extremities. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of lens A increases towards the edges to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.60 °C, similar to the core (coldest) value of lens B. Thus, the core <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of lens A is better representative of the properties of the lenses than that of B, which is also supported by the properties of the other identified lenses shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1506">As the gliders only surveyed the eastern branch of the Dotson-Getz Trough (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>c), CTD casts covering a wider area (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>) were also investigated for the presence of lenses, allowing further biogeochemical analysis of the lens water masses. The CTD casts with lenses were identified as water masses with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.70 °C at a depth greater than 200 m. These thresholds were chosen as all of the glider lens water masses had temperatures less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.70 °C (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>), apart from lens B which will be explored later. The CTD casts with lenses detected were: 8, 10, 16, 18, 231, 279 and 294 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>). The casts were located in similar regions to the lenses identified by the gliders, in the proximity of the eastern branch of the Dotson-Getz Trough (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>). No lenses were found either near the Dotson or Getz ice shelf fronts, or along the shallow bank north of Bear Island where there were CTD casts. This suggests that the formation of lenses observed in this campaign was through a mechanism local to the area around the eastern branch of the Dotson-Getz Trough. The CTD casts show that the lenses also appear further north in the trough (between 73.0 and 73.5° S), where the two Seagliders did not survey. Despite being constrained to the trough area, the location of the lenses varies, from the deepest part where the water depth is 900 m to the shallower trough edge with a water depth of 550 m (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>c and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e1545">Three lenses (D, J and CTD 279) are located at approximately 73.43° S, within 5 km from each other, within a 19 d period (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>). This suggests that it is the same lens, although there is a significant difference in size between D and J (approximately 20 km). Lens D was surveyed by SG579 just before recovery and therefore the coverage of lens D was cut short. Additionally, the two gliders were not following the same path, which means different parts of the lens were likely captured. The lens identified in CTD 18 is in approximately the same location as lens E, three hours later. Since the CTD is a single profile, it is not possible to determine the size or shape of the lens captured. The occurrence of these repeatedly surveyed lenses indicates that lenses are not short-lived features on the timescale of hours or days. The comparison between lenses in similar locations suggests that the size variation between surveys of the same lenses is an artefact of how the lens was surveyed.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1555">Temperature-salinity diagram for measurements in the study area from the gliders and CTD casts coloured by depth. Local water masses are labelled and the freezing line was calculated using TEOS-10 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.50"/>. End members are shown with a cross and grey dashed lines indicate water mass mixing lines. Black sloping lines depict potential density (kg m<sup>−3</sup>). The black dashed line depicts the location and properties of the lenses.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/21/2727/2025/os-21-2727-2025-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1581">Lenses identified in glider transects. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown for depth and distance travelled by <bold>(a)</bold> SG579 and <bold>(b)</bold> SG510. Black  contours show potential density (kg m<sup>−3</sup>). Cold lenses (A–J) are outlined in white dashes. <bold>(c)</bold> The location of the glider transects (blue for SG579 and black for SG510) and the lenses (green). The purple crosses depict where each respective glider transect starts. Bathymetry is from BedMachine v3 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.51"/> and isobaths are plotted in white.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/21/2727/2025/os-21-2727-2025-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1625">Properties of the main water masses and lenses identified in the Amundsen Sea Polynya determined from glider and CTD measurements. For WW this was determined by identifying the temperature minimum and for mCDW the temperature maxima and then selecting the associated values for the other properties, or those closest depending on sampling resolution. The core properties of the cold lenses in the Dotson Ice Shelf region from the Seagliders are labelled A–J corresponding to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> and CTD casts numbers correspond to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>. The core lens properties were identified by finding values associated with the temperature minimum, or closest value.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (° C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (g kg<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (kg m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">pH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">O<sub>2</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">DIC (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">O<sub>2sat</sub> (%)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Water masses</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">281</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2212</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">74</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">mCDW</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">195</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2258</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">55</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Lenses</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">289</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">76</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">281</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">74</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">281</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">74</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">282</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">74</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">I</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">282</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">74</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">J</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">278</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">74</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTD 8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">293</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2222</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">77</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTD 10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.81</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">292</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">77</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTD 16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">293</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">77</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTD 18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.82</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">291</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2221</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.51</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">77</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTD 231</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">291</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">77</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTD 279</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">288</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2222</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">76</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTD 294</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">291</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">77</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2544">Location of CTD casts during NBP22-02 ship-based campaign. CTD casts that did not capture a lens are shown as black crosses. CTD casts with a lens are shown as blue markers and identified with their cast numbers, with blue circles for profiles with sampling for DIC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and  blue crosses for those without such sampling. The colours of CTDs 8, 18 and 279 correspond to those in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>. Comparison CTD 194 (filled white circle) for temperature, salinity, O<sub>2</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O is at the same location as CTD 18. Grey markers show locations of comparison CTD casts from ASPIRE for DIC. Purple lines indicate the two glider tracks.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/21/2727/2025/os-21-2727-2025-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Core properties of the lenses</title>
      <p id="d2e2594">The end members of WW and mCDW and the core properties of each identified lens are shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>. These have been determined using both the glider and CTD measurements, where measurements of a variable exist for each. For mCDW and WW, the associated biogeochemical properties are those that align with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> end members. For the lenses the core is defined as the temperature minimum. This was checked using the standard deviations for the properties in all of the lenses (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA1"/>) which were all small. With the exception of lens B, all of the identified lenses have a core <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.70 °C. The mean core <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of all of the lenses (excluding B) is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.80 °C which is 0.05 °C lower than the end member of the overlying WW and 2.51 °C lower than the mCDW end member. The core of the lenses are also more saline and denser than WW, with a maximum difference of 0.23 g kg<sup>−1</sup> and 0.16 kg m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively. Conversely, mCDW is up to 0.51 g kg<sup>−1</sup> saltier and 0.30 kg m<sup>−3</sup> denser than the core of the lenses.</p>
      <p id="d2e2697">Measurements of pH show that the core of lens A had a pH 0.01 less than overlying WW (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>) and greater than deeper mCDW by 0.08. The lowest pH is found in mCDW as it is an old water mass that has remained isolated from the surface for an extended period of time, so DIC has accumulated in it through remineralisation. In WW, pH is higher than in mCDW as there has been recent surface exchange with the atmosphere, during a recent winter. As the lenses exhibit a pH more closely resembling that of WW it could be assumed that they have been at the ocean surface at a similar time. Concentrations of O<sub>2</sub> in the core of the lenses range between 278–293 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L<sup>−1</sup> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>) with a mean of 291 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2. They are similar to, or slightly higher than, O<sub>2</sub> concentrations in WW (281 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L<sup>−1</sup>) and much higher than in mCDW (195 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L<sup>−1</sup>) as O<sub>2</sub> has been consumed in mCDW through remineralisation and there has been no exchange with the surface to replenish depleted O<sub>2</sub>. As with pH, the similarity between O<sub>2</sub> in the lenses and WW suggests recent interaction with the atmosphere. The slight increase from WW to the lenses could be a result of colder water being able to absorb more O<sub>2</sub> from the atmosphere during ventilation, however, the O<sub>2</sub> saturation is only 2 %–3 % higher than WW in more than half of the lenses that have O<sub>2</sub> measurements.</p>
      <p id="d2e2851">The differences between the lenses captured by both CTD casts and gliders (i.e. D, J and 279 as well as 18 and E) could be due to the fact the CTD casts are a single profile and do not extend horizontally. The temperature minimum in each single CTD profile is considered the core temperature of the lens, whereas the glider profiles reveal that the lenses can be as large as 25 km horizontally. The glider profiles also show that the lens properties can vary between the core and extremities. This highlights a limitation of lower resolution CTD sampling.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e2857">Depth profiles with lenses in blue and a comparison profile(s) in grey. <bold>(a–e)</bold> Data from the 3 CTD casts with a lens and biogeochemical sampling. <bold>(f)</bold> Data from SG579, lens A. See Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> for location of the comparison profiles. Horizontal lines depict the location of the lens in the water column and the colour of this line corresponds to the CTD cast/glider profile. </p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/21/2727/2025/os-21-2727-2025-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Comparison with surrounding water</title>
      <p id="d2e2882">Lenses observed in each CTD cast are located at different depths, with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> minimum found within the range of 240 and 405 m (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>). The varying profile shapes within the lenses possibly reflect the same feature observed by the glider transects, where the difference in lens shape and size depends on which part of the lens was captured by the single profile. Three of the CTDs with lenses (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>) were additionally sampled for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and DIC as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>d and e. For CTD 8 the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O decreases from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 200 m in WW to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 300 m within the lens. For CTD 18 the decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O is from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 200 m (WW) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> within the lens at 400 m. For CTD 279 the decrease is from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 245 m (WW) to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at 345 m, just below the lens. In the WW (depths between 100–200 m) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O is approximately 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> more depleted than in mCDW (depths greater than 450 m). Although there are only seven data points of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O within the lenses and sample distribution with depth is sparse, these results suggest that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O values of the lens cores are more depleted than those of WW (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e3061">The effect of sea ice formation and melt on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O is small compared with meteoric inputs, whereas the effect on salinity is large. The derived freshwater contributions of meteoric input and sea ice formation, calculated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, allow us to identify the processes affecting the lenses. The freshwater fractions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>) reveal a negative sea ice contribution to the lenses which indicates net sea ice formation, greatest for CTD 18 and least for CTD 8. There is no <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O measurement at the depth within the lens from CTD 279, but the measurement just below the lens also shows a negative sea ice melt contribution. Water above the lenses, especially close to the surface, has a positive sea ice meltwater contribution, indicating net sea ice melt which has occurred locally in the spring.</p>
      <p id="d2e3099">DIC concentrations in the lenses are slightly higher than in WW, by up to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<sup>−1</sup> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>). Similar to pH and O<sub>2</sub>, mCDW has the highest DIC concentration (2261 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<sup>−1</sup>) as it has spent the longest time isolated from the atmosphere. Additionally, DIC accumulates in the water column due to the breakdown of organic matter which produces DIC.</p>
      <p id="d2e3158">The CTD casts with a lens are compared with a CTD profile where a lens was not observed (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>). For temperature, salinity, O<sub>2</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, the comparison CTD cast (CTD 194) was in the same location as the lens CTD cast (CTD 18), 20 d later (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>). No additional CTD casts were sampled for DIC in the region of the Dotson Trough during the TARSAN-ARTEMIS campaign. Instead, two CTD casts were sourced for comparison from the ASPIRE campaign in December 2010–January 2011 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.52"/>, within 25 km of CTD 18 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>). Three consecutive SG579 dives immediately after the glider exited lens A were selected for a comparison of pH profiles in the lens with pH profiles in surrounding water.</p>
      <p id="d2e3192">Temperature and salinity are lower in the lenses than in nearby water at the same depth (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>) by up to 1.50 °C and 0.16 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The dissolved O<sub>2</sub> concentration and O<sub>2</sub> saturation is higher in the lenses than in surrounding water (by approximately 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L<sup>−1</sup> and 11 %, respectively) indicating the ability of cold water to dissolve more O<sub>2</sub>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O in the lenses is approximately 0.18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">‰</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than surrounding water. The lens has DIC concentrations very similar to one of the ASPIRE CTD casts (CTD 9) but approximately 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg<sup>−1</sup> lower than the other (CTD 72, collected about 2 weeks later in the season and over a deeper part of the trough). The lower DIC concentration is consistent with pH which is 0.02 higher in the lens than in surrounding water at the same depth.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e3301">Vertical profiles of freshwater fractions from meteoric (blue) and sea ice melt (green) sources derived from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements for the three CTD casts with lenses. The horizontal blue dashed lines indicate the locations of the lenses with colours corresponding to CTD profile following Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>. </p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/21/2727/2025/os-21-2727-2025-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3336">Evidence of deep convection from the surface to depths less than 400 m or to the seabed (if shallower than 400 m), as indicated by seal profiles, was observed on the shallow shelf around Martin Peninsula and to the east of the Dotson-Getz Trough (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a), plus very occasionally in deeper water across the trough. Temperatures within these profiles reach a minimum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.85 °C at depths of approximately 300–400 m (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>b). These temperatures are associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than 34.25 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, consistent with the properties of the lenses.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e3375">Seal tag CTD profiles in austral autumn/winter from 2014 and 2022. <bold>(a)</bold> Locations of seal tag profiles from 2014 and 2022, coloured by month. Circles outlined in black are those that meet criteria for deep convection from the surface to depths less than 400 m or to the sea bed if shallower, and have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.7° C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 34.25 and 34.35 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, and potential density anomaly between 27.45 and 27.55 kg m<sup>−3</sup>. The criteria for deep convection was defined by a surface to deepest value difference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> less than 0.05 °C and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> less than 0.0250 g kg<sup>−1</sup>. <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of seal tag profiles within region, coloured points in the foreground correspond to the profiles outlined in black in <bold>(a)</bold>. Curved dotted lines represent potential density (kg m<sup>−3</sup>) contours and the freezing line is the black dashed line. </p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/21/2727/2025/os-21-2727-2025-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e3513">The low temperature, relatively high salinity and relatively high density of the lenses compared with WW suggest that the lenses are formed by a mechanism similar to that of WW, but more intense. The 2014 seal tag profiles discussed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.53"/> in the area north of Bear Peninsula revealed intense heat loss in the surface ocean alongside deepening of the mixed layer and salinification from brine rejection. Heat and salt budgets suggested a sea ice formation rate of approximately 3 cm d<sup>−1</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.54"/>. Therefore, we are confident that sea ice formation and cooling play a role in lens development. The water surrounding the lenses at the same depth is a mixture of local WW and mCDW. This mixing would lead to higher temperatures and salinities than WW due to the mCDW properties. The mCDW contribution would also have a low O<sub>2</sub> concentration, less depleted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O values, high DIC concentration and low pH content. The properties of the lenses indicate that they have not mixed with mCDW. The notable difference between the properties of the lenses and nearby water indicates that the lenses may not have formed locally. We hypothesise that dense water in the lenses is produced during winter by cooling and sea ice formation. Increased cooling would increase brine rejection, through sea ice formation, and both would increase density. The lens properties sit just warmer than the freezing line, much closer to it than WW (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). The greater density mCDW prevents the lenses from sinking to the bottom of the water column and contributing to overturning, unlike polynyas in the cold sectors of Antarctica. Water as cold as our observations at these depths has been seen in similar locations by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.55"/> in 2010/2011 and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.56"/> in 2014. This suggests that the lenses are recurring features, and supports the theory that they could form annually through sea ice formation. The findings from this study suggest that the formation mechanism is particularly prevalent around the Dotson region, in comparison to nearby Getz which was also surveyed. The higher DIC concentration within the lenses than the overlying WW also suggests the importance of sea ice formation as DIC is rejected alongside salt during the freezing of seawater <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.57"/>. The increased O<sub>2</sub> and DIC in the lenses relative to WW could indicate that stronger surface cooling was present, increasing the solubility of O<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> and leading to more uptake and a higher O<sub>2</sub> saturation. Further support for the role of sea ice formation in lens development comes from the estimated freshwater fractions. The negative contribution of sea ice melt and subsequent indication of sea ice formation at only the depth of the lenses indicates sea ice formation plays a role in their creation. The values of sea ice melt in WW are less negative than in the lenses, despite sea ice formation also taking place in WW. Properties of WW vary depending on the circumstances when it formed (not necessarily the previous winter), such as the extent of sea ice formation, wind strength and direction, and net surface heat loss.</p>

      <fig id="F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e3605">Schematic depicting (left hand side) the two hypothesised formation mechanisms of the lenses and their properties. The numbers reference the formation mechanism with (1) formation in shallow water due to sea ice formation and spilling into deeper water and (2) local chimneys of convective mixing. The right hand side depicts the properties of the overlying WW relative to the lenses.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/21/2727/2025/os-21-2727-2025-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e3614">We propose two possible mechanisms for lens formation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>). The first is that they are formed in shallow waters where there is strong surface heat loss and little ability to gain heat by mixing warm water from below. We suggest that this could partly occur nearby in the 300–400 m water to the east of the Dotson-Getz Trough, where studies have highlighted a key area of sea ice formation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.58"><named-content content-type="post">and highlighted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/></named-content></xref> due to the presence of the persistent polynya. Winter sea ice concentrations six months prior to our field campaign show a persistent wintertime polynya there, with intense sea ice formation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>). This area also exhibits seal tag profiles in winter that show deep convection (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a). Intense heat loss could also occur in the shallow region surrounding Martin Peninsula to the west of the Dotson-Getz Trough, where there is also sea ice production <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.59"/>. It is possible that the lenses then spill off the shallow regions and follow isopycnals to become neutrally buoyant at approximately 400 m depth in deeper areas, in a similar mechanism to meddies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.60"/>, and sit above the dense mCDW. The WW above the lenses has different properties as it may be formed locally in deeper regions, with less intense cooling and sea ice formation.</p>
      <p id="d2e3637">The second postulated mechanism is local formation through intense deep convection in winter, in a similar form to convective chimneys observed in the Arctic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.61"/>. Deep convection requires intense surface cooling and brine rejection. We suggest that as the surface ocean warms and re-stratifies in spring, the chimneys break down <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.62"/> and the water formed by this deep convection remains at depth. As these are localised features, surrounding water at the same depth has different properties. Further hydrographic profiles, particularly during autumn and winter, both in the trough and on the surrounding shallow regions, would help to determine whether one or both of the hypothesised mechanisms commonly occur. For example, deployments of profiling/grounding biogeochemical Argo floats would enable observations under the sea ice in winter.</p>
      <p id="d2e3646">Whilst previous studies have seen water masses with these lens properties in the Amundsen Sea region during summer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.63"/>, this is the first time that these lenses have been investigated. There remains unanswered questions that merit further research, such as the impacts of the lenses. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="text.64"/> found that the deep WW layers located at the nearby Getz Ice Shelf reduce the ocean heat transport into the Getz Ice Shelf cavity. In a similar process, the lenses reduce heat content and could act to reduce the transport of heat under DIS. Another potential effect is that if the lenses at the depth of the base of the DIS were to advect under it, they may act as a barrier to basal melting. We did not observe lenses at the ice front or in the cavity, but high resolution measurements of water masses and currents beneath the ice shelf would be needed to confirm this. The fate of the lenses is not determined in this study. Whilst the Amundsen Sea has been identified as a region of minimal carbon sequestration due to the presence of mCDW preventing the formation of deep water masses with a high carbon content <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.65"/>, the lenses do provide a mechanism for transporting carbon deeper than typical WW can achieve (approximately 200 m). Further studies are required to understand the fate of this carbon in the lenses and its ultimate fate.</p>
      <p id="d2e3658">Surveys carried out by the autonomous underwater gliders allowed the identification of the size, shape and properties of the lenses. In our study, glider profiles were spaced 1–2 km apart, comparable to the spacing used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.66"/>, who successfully resolved eddy features with scales of 10 km. Given that the lenses we observed were up to 2–3 times larger than those eddies, we are confident that our glider resolution was sufficient to capture the full and representative distribution of lenses present in the study area. This suggests that surveys in the Amundsen Sea with novel, high resolution sensors can improve our understanding of subsurface features. There was no signature of the lenses in dynamic height, calculated using in situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pressure and a reference pressure of 500 m, indicating that the lenses would not be identifiable using satellite altimetry.</p>

      <fig id="F9"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e3684">Sea ice cover from AMSR2 (%) for 18 July 2021 in the southern Amundsen Sea. The light blue areas within the black lines have less than 15 % sea ice cover. White areas indicate a lack of data.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/21/2727/2025/os-21-2727-2025-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e3702">In the southern Amundsen Sea, isolated subsurface lenses at depths of 240 to 500 m have been identified in the area of the eastern branch of the Dotson-Getz Trough. To our knowledge, this is the first study to analyse these lenses in detail. The lenses are colder, saltier and denser than overlying WW and are associated with a higher DIC concentration, lower pH and an enhanced fraction of net sea-ice formation (as determined from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O-derived freshwater fractions). We hypothesis that the lenses are a denser, colder variety of WW, formed under different conditions. Evidence from the lens features, the estimated sea ice melt and wintertime seal tag profiles suggests that the lenses are formed by a combination of intense cooling and brine rejection. These processes are possibly aligned with regions of strong sea ice production and/or shallower waters, which cause the lenses to have different properties from overlying WW. The lenses sit above mCDW as they are not dense enough to sink below it. Further studies are needed to understand how the lenses move and lose their characteristics, how their volume and properties vary, where else in the region they may be located and where they form. Depending on their movement, the lenses could have implications for the transfer of heat underneath regional ice shelves, such as DIS, and could act as a buffer to basal melting. They may also provide a mechanism for sequestering carbon to deeper depths than typical WW can achieve. The identification and characterisation of these lenses highlight the ability of autonomous vehicles to capture features that are not easily detectable using single ship-based profiles. The detection of these lenses not only deepens our understanding of regional oceanographic processes, but also demonstrates the role of autonomous observations in revealing smaller, yet potentially impactful, features.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title/>

<table-wrap id="TA1"><label>Table A1</label><caption><p id="d2e3729">Standard deviations of the properties within the identified lenses. For the CTDs this was defined as the heterogenous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> layer. For the glider measurements this was defined as the heterogenous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> layer in the dive that contained the core <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> minimum.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">pH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">O<sub>2</sub></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(° C)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(g kg<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(kg m<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> L<sup>−1</sup>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.031</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.024</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.015</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.032</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">F</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">G</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.024</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.019</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.007</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">I</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.018</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">J</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.025</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTD 8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTD 10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTD 16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTD 18</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.021</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.027</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.022</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTD 231</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.041</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.004</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.002</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTD 279</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CTD 294</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.006</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.005</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>


</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e4256">The glider datasets are publicly available on the British Oceanographic Database Centre (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5285/35b7832c-2432-fb41-e063-7086abc0c610" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5285/35b7832c-2432-fb41-e063-7086abc0c610</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="altparen.67"/>). The pH dataset from SG579 is available separately at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5285/33d1f143-47b5-a7d1-e063-7086abc03081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5285/33d1f143-47b5-a7d1-e063-7086abc03081</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.68"/>. The 2022 CTD measurements are publicly available on the United States Antarctic Program Data Center: <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.15784/601785" ext-link-type="DOI">10.15784/601785</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.69"/>. The seal data are available at MEOP: <uri>https://www.meop.net/database/meop-databases/index.html</uri> (last access: 1 December 2024).</p>

      <p id="d2e4281">Auxiliary data utilised in figures can be found at <uri>https://data.seaice.uni-bremen.de</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.70"/>.  BedMachinev3 is available from the National Snow and Ice Centre Database (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/FPSU0V1MWUB6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/FPSU0V1MWUB6</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="altparen.71"/>).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e4299">DDP conducted processing and analysis of glider measurements with input from DCEB, KJH and BYQ. GAL was responsible for the glider preparation, deployment and recovery. SL provided the pH sensor and delivered technical support. EMH processed the pH sensor output and supported analysis. SES was responsible for processing the CTD measurements, Winkler titrations for O<sub>2</sub> and calculated the freshwater fractions. PLY was Chief-scientist of the 2010-11 expedition, Co-chief scientist of the NBP22-02 expedition, and collected and processed DIC measurements from 2010/2011 and 2022. FG processed and plotted seal tag measurements and contributed to interpretation alongside BGMW and KJH. DDP wrote the paper with input and revisions from all authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e4314">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Ocean Science</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e4323">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d2e4329">This article is part of the special issue “Advances in ocean science from underwater gliders”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e4335">Logistics for this research were provided by NSF-U.S and the NERC-British Antarctic Survey. We thank the United States Antarctic Program (USAP), including the captain, crew, and science team onboard the Nathaniel B. Palmer (NBP) 22-02 for field support. We also thank the UEA glider group for piloting the gliders during this campaign and the Ocean Technology and Engineering Group at the National Oceanography Centre for providing the Lab-On-Chip pH sensor.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e4340">Funding from the Faculty of Science at the University of East Anglia supported DDP. This work is from the TARSAN project, a component of the International Thwaites Glacier Collaboration (ITGC) with funding from the National Science Foundation (NSF: Grant 1738992) and Natural Environment Research Council (NERC: Grant NE/S006419/1). This research has the ITGC Contribution No.: ITGC-154. We also acknowledge funding from NERC (Grant: ARTEMIS NE/W007045/1) to KH and NSF (Grant: 1941483 and 1941327 – NSFGEO-NERC: ARTEMIS) to PLY and SES. Funding to UEA (NERC: Grant NE/J005703/1 and University of St Andrews (NERC: Grant NE/JOO5649/1) facilitated seal tag observations.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e4346">This paper was edited by Ilker Fer and reviewed by Travis Miles and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Armi et al.(1988)Armi, Hebert, Oakey, Price, Richardson, Rossby, and Ruddick</label><mixed-citation>Armi, L., Hebert, D., Oakey, N., Price, J., Richardson, P. L., Rossby, T., and Ruddick, B.: The history and decay of a Mediterranean salt lens, Nature, 333, 649–651, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/333649a0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/333649a0</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Boehme et al.(2009)Boehme, Lovell, Biuw, Roquet, Nicholson, Thorpe, Meredith, and Fedak</label><mixed-citation>Boehme, L., Lovell, P., Biuw, M., Roquet, F., Nicholson, J., Thorpe, S. E., Meredith, M. P., and Fedak, M.: Technical Note: Animal-borne CTD-Satellite Relay Data Loggers for real-time oceanographic data collection, Ocean Sci., 5, 685–695, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-5-685-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-5-685-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Chelton et al.(1998)Chelton, deSzoeke, Schlax, Naggar, and Siwertz</label><mixed-citation>Chelton, D. B., deSzoeke, R. A., Schlax, M. G., Naggar, K. E., and Siwertz, N.: Geographical variability of the first baroclinic Rossby radius of deformation, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 28, 433–460, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0433:GVOTFB&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0433:GVOTFB&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Couto et al.(2017)Couto, Martinson, Kohut, and Schofield</label><mixed-citation>Couto, N., Martinson, D. G., Kohut, J., and Schofield, O.: Distribution of Upper Circumpolar Deep Water on the warming continental shelf of the West Antarctic Peninsula, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 122, 5306–5315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC012840" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JC012840</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Delille et al.(2014)Delille, Vancoppenolle, Geilfus, Tilbrook, Lannuzel, Schoemann, Becquevort, Carnat, Delille, Lancelot, Chou, Dieckmann, and Tison</label><mixed-citation>Delille, B., Vancoppenolle, M., Geilfus, N.-X., Tilbrook, B., Lannuzel, D., Schoemann, V., Becquevort, S., Carnat, G., Delille, D., Lancelot, C., Chou, L., Dieckmann, G. S., and Tison, J.-L.: Southern Ocean CO<sub>2</sub> sink: The contribution of the sea ice, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119, 6340–6355, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC009941" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JC009941</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Dickson et al.(2007)Dickson, Sabine, Christian, and Organization.</label><mixed-citation>Dickson, A. G. A. G., Sabine, C. L., Christian, J. R., and Organization., N. P. M. S.: Guide to best practices for ocean CO<sub>2</sub> measurements, North Pacific Marine Science Organization, ISBN 1897176074, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Gade(1979)</label><mixed-citation> Gade, H. G.: Melting of Ice in Sea Water: A Primitive Model with Application to the Antarctic Ice Shelf and Icebergs, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 9, 189–198, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Garau et al.(2011)Garau, Ruiz, Zhang, Pascual, Heslop, Kerfoot, and Tintoré</label><mixed-citation>Garau, B., Ruiz, S., Zhang, W. G., Pascual, A., Heslop, E., Kerfoot, J., and Tintoré, J.: Thermal lag correction on Slocum CTD glider data, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 28, 1065–1071, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-10-05030.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JTECH-D-10-05030.1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Garcia amd Gordon(1992)</label><mixed-citation>Garcia, H. E. and Gordon, L. I.: Oxygen solubility in seawater: Better fitting equations, Limnology and Oceanography, 37, 1307–1312, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1992.37.6.1307" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1992.37.6.1307</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Golledge et al.(2025)Golledge, Keller, Gossart, Malyarenko, Bahamondes-Dominguez, Krapp, Jendersie, Lowry, Alevropoulos-Borrill, and Notz</label><mixed-citation>Golledge, N. R., Keller, E. D., Gossart, A., Malyarenko, A., Bahamondes-Dominguez, A., Krapp, M., Jendersie, S., Lowry, D. P., Alevropoulos-Borrill, A., and Notz, D.: Antarctic coastal polynyas in the global climate system, Nature Reviews Earth &amp; Environment, 6, 126–139, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00634-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43017-024-00634-x</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Ha et al.(2014)Ha, Wåhlin, Kim, Lee, Lee, Lee, Hong, Arneborg, Björk, and Kalén</label><mixed-citation>Ha, H. K., Wåhlin, A. K., Kim, T. W., Lee, S. H., Lee, J. H., Lee, H. J., Hong, C. S., Arneborg, L., Björk, G., and Kalén, O.: Circulation and modification of Warm Deep Water on the central Amundsen Shelf, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 44, 1493–1501, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-13-0240.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-13-0240.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Hahn(2013)</label><mixed-citation> Hahn, J.: Oxygen variability and eddy-driven meridional oxygen supply in the tropical North East Atlantic oxygen minimum zone, Ph.D. thesis, Christian-Albrechts Universität Kiel,  URN: urn:nbn:de:gbv:8-diss-120325, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Hennig et al.(2024)Hennig, Mucciarone, Jacobs, Mortlock, and Dunbar</label><mixed-citation>Hennig, A. N., Mucciarone, D. A., Jacobs, S. S., Mortlock, R. A., and Dunbar, R. B.: Meteoric water and glacial melt in the southeastern Amundsen Sea: a time series from 1994 to 2020, The Cryosphere, 18, 791–818, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-791-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-18-791-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Heywood et al.(2016)Heywood, Biddle, Boehme, Dutrieux, Fedak, Jenkins, Jones, Kaiser, Mallett, Garabato, Renfrew, Stevens, and Webber</label><mixed-citation>Heywood, K. J., Biddle, L. C., Boehme, L., Dutrieux, P., Fedak, M., Jenkins, A., Jones, R. W., Kaiser, J., Mallett, H., Garabato, A. C. N., Renfrew, I. A., Stevens, D. P., and Webber, B. G.: Between the devil and the deep blue sea: The role of the Amundsen Sea continental shelf in exchanges between ocean and ice shelves, Oceanography, 29, 118–129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2016.104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5670/oceanog.2016.104</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Heywood et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Heywood, K. J., Hall, R. A., Lee, G. A., Zheng, Y., Leadbitter, P., Rollo, C., Azaneu, M. D. C., Damerell, G., Mustafa, J. M., Oelerich, R., Queste, B. Y., Sheehan, P. M. F., Siddle, E., and Webber, B. G. M.: Temperature and salinity seaglider observations in the Amundsen Sea, Antarctica, January – February 2022, NERC EDS British Oceanographic Data Centre NOC [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5285/35b7832c-2432-fb41-e063-7086abc0c610" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5285/35b7832c-2432-fb41-e063-7086abc0c610</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Lee et al.(2017)Lee, Hwang, Ducklow, Hahm, Lee, Kim, Hyun, Park, Ha, Kim, Yang, and Shin</label><mixed-citation>Lee, S., Hwang, J., Ducklow, H. W., Hahm, D., Lee, S. H., Kim, D., Hyun, J.-H., Park, J., Ha, H. K., Kim, T.-W., Yang, E. J., and Shin, H. C.: Evidence of minimal carbon sequestration in the productive Amundsen Sea polynya, Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 7892–7899, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074646" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL074646</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Lopez et al.(2015)Lopez, Malardé, Danès, and Gaspar</label><mixed-citation> Lopez, R., Malardé, J.-P., Danès, P., and Gaspar, P.: Improving Argos Doppler location using multiple-model smoothing, Animal Biotelemetry, 3, 1–9, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Marshall and Schott(1999)</label><mixed-citation>Marshall, J. and Schott, F.: Open-ocean convection: Observations, theory, and models, Reviews of Geophysics, 37, 1–64, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98RG02739" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98RG02739</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>McDougall et al.(2010)McDougall, Feistel, Millero, Jackett, Wright, King, Marion, Chen, and Spitzer</label><mixed-citation> McDougall, T., Feistel, R., Millero, F., Jackett, D. R., Wright, D., King, B., Marion, G., Chen, C.-T. A., and Spitzer, P.: The International Thermodynamic Equation of Seawater 2010 (TEOS-10): Calculation and use of thermodynamic properties, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>McDowell and Rossby(1978)</label><mixed-citation>McDowell, S. E. and Rossby, H. T.: Mediterranean water: An intense mesoscale eddy off the Bahamas, Science, 202, 1085–1087, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.202.4372.1085" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.202.4372.1085</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Meredith et al.(2008)Meredith, Brandon, Wallace, Clarke, Leng, Renfrew, van Lipzig, and King</label><mixed-citation>Meredith, M. P., Brandon, M. A., Wallace, M. I., Clarke, A., Leng, M. J., Renfrew, I. A., van Lipzig, N. P., and King, J. C.: Variability in the freshwater balance of northern Marguerite Bay, Antarctic Peninsula: Results from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 55, 309–322, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.11.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.11.005</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Miles et al.(2016)Miles, Lee, Wåhlin, Ha, Kim, Assmann, and Schofield</label><mixed-citation>Miles, T., Lee, S. H., Wåhlin, A., Ha, H. K., Kim, T. W., Assmann, K. M., and Schofield, O.: Glider observations of the Dotson Ice Shelf outflow, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 123, 16–29, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DSR2.2015.08.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/J.DSR2.2015.08.008</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Millero(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Millero, F. J.: The marine inorganic carbon cycle, Chemical Reviews, 107, 308–341, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0503557" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr0503557</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Morlighem(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Morlighem, M.: MEaSUREs BedMachine Antarctica, Version 3,  NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/FPSU0V1MWUB6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/FPSU0V1MWUB6</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Mu et al.(2014)Mu, Stammerjohn, Lowry, and Yager</label><mixed-citation>Mu, L., Stammerjohn, S. E., Lowry, K. E., and Yager, P. L.: Spatial variability of surface pCO<sub>2</sub> and air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux in the Amundsen Sea Polynya, Antarctica, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 3, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.12952/journal.elementa.000036</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Nakayama et al.(2024)Nakayama, Jourdain, van Caspel, Timmermann, and De Rydt</label><mixed-citation>Nakayama, Y., Jourdain, N., van Caspel, M., Timmermann, R., and De Rydt, J.: MIPkit-A (MISOMIP2), Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10474700" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.10474700</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Nomura and Yoshikawa-Inoue(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Nomura, D. and Yoshikawa-Inoue, H.: The effect of sea-ice growth on air–sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux in a tank experiment, Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00204.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00204.x</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>NSF/NERC ARTEMIS and ITGC TARSAN(2024)</label><mixed-citation>NSF/NERC ARTEMIS and ITGC TARSAN: Vertical ocean profiles collected by a Conductivity-Temperature-Depth (CTD) package in the Amundsen Sea, U.S. Antarctic Program (USAP) Data Center [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.15784/601785" ext-link-type="DOI">10.15784/601785</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Ohshima et al.(2013)Ohshima, Fukamachi, Williams, Nihashi, Roquet, Kitade, Tamura, Hirano, Herraiz-Borreguero, Field, Hindell, Aoki, and Wakatsuchi</label><mixed-citation>Ohshima, K. I., Fukamachi, Y., Williams, G. D., Nihashi, S., Roquet, F., Kitade, Y., Tamura, T., Hirano, D., Herraiz-Borreguero, L., Field, I., Hindell, M., Aoki, S., and Wakatsuchi, M.: Antarctic Bottom Water production by intense sea-ice formation in the Cape Darnley polynya, Nature Geoscience, 6, 235–240, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1738" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1738</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Ohshima et al.(2016)Ohshima, Nihashi, and Iwamoto</label><mixed-citation>Ohshima, K. I., Nihashi, S., and Iwamoto, K.: Global view of sea-ice production in polynyas and its linkage to dense/bottom water formation, Geoscience Letters, 3, 1–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-016-0045-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40562-016-0045-4</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Östlund and Hut(1984)</label><mixed-citation>Östlund, H. G. and Hut, G.: Arctic Ocean water mass balance from isotope data, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 89, 6373–6381, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC089iC04p06373" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JC089iC04p06373</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Pickup et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Pickup D. D., Hammermeister, E., Loucaides, S., Lee, G. A., Bakker, D. C. E., Heywood, K. J., Hall, R. A., Yager, P. L., and Queste, B. Y.: pH measurements using a Lab-on-Chip sensor on a Seaglider in the Amundsen Sea, Antarctica, January – February 2022, version 2, NERC EDS British Oceanographic Data Centre NOC [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5285/33d1f143-47b5-a7d1-e063-7086abc03081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5285/33d1f143-47b5-a7d1-e063-7086abc03081</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Queste et al.(2012)Queste, Heywood, Kaiser, Lee, Matthews, Schmidtko, Walker-Brown, and Woodward</label><mixed-citation>Queste, B. Y., Heywood, K. J., Kaiser, J., Lee, G. A., Matthews, A., Schmidtko, S., Walker-Brown, C., and Woodward, S. W.: Deployments in extreme conditions: Pushing the boundaries of Seaglider capabilities, ISBN 9781457720567, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/AUV.2012.6380740" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/AUV.2012.6380740</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Randall-Goodwin et al.(2015)Randall-Goodwin, Meredith, Jenkins, Yager, Sherrell, Abrahamsen, Gurero, Yuan, Mortlock, Gavahan, Alderkamp, Ducklow, Robertson, and Stammerjohn</label><mixed-citation>Randall-Goodwin, E., Meredith, M. P., Jenkins, A., Yager, P. L., Sherrell, R. M., Abrahamsen, E. P., Gurero, R., Yuan, X., Mortlock, R. A., Gavahan, K., Alderkamp, A. C., Ducklow, H., Robertson, R., and Stammerjohn, S. E.: Freshwater distributions and water mass structure in the Amundsen Sea Polynya region, Antarctica, Elementa, 3, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000065" ext-link-type="DOI">10.12952/journal.elementa.000065</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Rysgaard et al.(2007)Rysgaard, Glud, Sejr, Bendtsen, and Christensen</label><mixed-citation>Rysgaard, S., Glud, R. N., Sejr, M. K., Bendtsen, J., and Christensen, P. B.: Inorganic carbon transport during sea ice growth and decay: A carbon pump in polar seas, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003572" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JC003572</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Rysgaard et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Rysgaard, S., Bendtsen, J., Delille, B., Dieckmann, G. S., Glud, R. N.,  Kennedy, H., Mortensen, J., Papadimitriou, S., Thomas, D. N., and Tison,  J.-L.: Sea ice contribution to the air–sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange in the Arctic and  Southern Oceans, Tellus B, 63, 823–830, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00571.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00571.x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Savidge et al.(2023)Savidge, Snow, Siegfried, Zheng, Bôas, Bortolotto, Boehme, and Alley</label><mixed-citation>Savidge, E., Snow, T., Siegfried, M. R., Zheng, Y., Bôas, A. B. V.,   Bortolotto, G. A., Boehme, L., and Alley, K. E.: Wintertime polynya structure  and variability from thermal remote sensing and seal-borne observations at  Pine Island Glacier, West Antarctica, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and  Remote Sensing, 61, 1–13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3271453" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2023.3271453</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Spreen et al.(2008)Spreen, Kaleschke, and Heygster</label><mixed-citation>Spreen, G., Kaleschke, L., and Heygster, G.: Sea ice remote sensing using AMSR-E 89 GHz channels, J. Geophys. Res., 113, C02S03, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003384" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JC003384</ext-link>, 2008 (data available at: <uri>https://data.seaice.uni-bremen.de</uri>, last access: 5 March 2025).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Stammerjohn(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Stammerjohn, S.: Vertical ocean profiles collected by a Conductivity-Temperature-Depth (CTD) package in the Amundsen Sea, U.S. Antarctic Program (USAP) Data Center [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.15784/601785" ext-link-type="DOI">10.15784/601785</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Steiger et al.(2021)Steiger, Darelius, Wåhlin, and Assmann</label><mixed-citation>Steiger, N., Darelius, E., Wåhlin, A. K., and Assmann, K. M.: Intermittent reduction in ocean heat transport into the Getz Ice Shelf cavity during strong wind events, Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2021GL093599, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093599" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL093599</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Tamura et al.(2008)Tamura, Ohshima, and Nihashi</label><mixed-citation>Tamura, T., Ohshima, K. I., and Nihashi, S.: Mapping of sea ice production for Antarctic coastal polynyas, Geophysical Research Letters, 35, 7606, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032903" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL032903</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Wadhams et al.(2002)Wadhams, Holfort, Hansen, and Wilkinson</label><mixed-citation>Wadhams, P., Holfort, J., Hansen, E., and Wilkinson, J. P.: A deep convective   chimney in the winter Greenland Sea, Geophysical Research Letters, 29, 76-1–76-4,  2002.  </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Wåhlin et al.(2010)Wåhlin, Yuan, Björk, and Nohr</label><mixed-citation>Wåhlin, A. K., Yuan, X., Björk, G., and Nohr, C.: Inflow of warm Circumpolar Deep Water in the central Amundsen shelf, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 40, 1427–1434, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JPO4431.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2010JPO4431.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Williams et al.(2008)Williams, Bindoff, Marsland, and Rintoul</label><mixed-citation>Williams, G. D., Bindoff, N. L., Marsland, S. J., and Rintoul, S. R.: Formation and export of dense shelf water from the Adélie Depression, East Antarctica, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004346" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JC004346</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Yager et al.(2012)Yager, Sherrell, Stammerjohn, Alderkamp, Schofield, Abrahamsen, Arrigo, Bertilsson, Garay, Guerrero, Lowry, Moksnes, Ndungo, Post, Randall-Goodwin, Riemann, Severmann, Thatje, van Dijken, and Wilson</label><mixed-citation>Yager, P., Sherrell, R., Stammerjohn, S., Alderkamp, A.-C., Schofield, O., Abrahamsen, P., Arrigo, K., Bertilsson, S., Garay, L., Guerrero, R., Lowry, K., Moksnes, P.-O., Ndungo, K., Post, A., Randall-Goodwin, E., Riemann, L., Severmann, S., Thatje, S., van Dijken, G., and Wilson, S.: ASPIRE: The Amundsen Sea Polynya International Research Expedition, Oceanography, 25, 40–53, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2012.73" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5670/oceanog.2012.73</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Yager et al.(2016)Yager, Sherrell, Stammerjohn, Ducklow, Schofield, Ingall, Wilson, Lowry, Williams, Riemann, Bertilsson, Alderkamp, Dinasquet, Logares, Richert, Sipler, Melara, Mu, Newstead, Post, Swalethorp, and van Dijken</label><mixed-citation>Yager, P., Sherrell, R., Stammerjohn, S., Ducklow, H., Schofield, O., Ingall, E., Wilson, S., Lowry, K., Williams, C., Riemann, L., Bertilsson, S., Alderkamp, A.-C., Dinasquet, J., Logares, R., Richert, I., Sipler, R., Melara, A., Mu, L., Newstead, R., Post, A., Swalethorp, R., and van Dijken, G.: A carbon budget for the Amundsen Sea Polynya, Antarctica: Estimating net community production and export in a highly productive polar ecosystem, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 4, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000140" ext-link-type="DOI">10.12952/journal.elementa.000140</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Yang et al.(2022)Yang, Kim, Dutrieux, Wåhlin, Jenkins, Ha, Kim, Cho, Park, Lee, and Cho</label><mixed-citation>Yang, H. W., Kim, T. W., Dutrieux, P., Wåhlin, A. K., Jenkins, A., Ha, H. K., Kim, C. S., Cho, K. H., Park, T., Lee, S. H., and Cho, Y. K.: Seasonal variability of ocean circulation near the Dotson Ice Shelf, Antarctica, Nature Communications, 13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28751-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-022-28751-5</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Yin et al.(2021)Yin, Papadimitriou, Rérolle, Arundell, Cardwell, Walk, Palmer, Fowell, Schaap, Mowlem, and Loucaides</label><mixed-citation>Yin, T., Papadimitriou, S., Rérolle, V. M. C., Arundell, M., Cardwell, C. L., Walk, J., Palmer, M. R., Fowell, S. E., Schaap, A., Mowlem, M. C., and Loucaides, S.: A novel Lab-on-Chip Spectrophotometric pH sensor for autonomous in situ seawater measurements to 6000 m depth on stationary and moving observing platforms, Environmental Science &amp; Technology, 55, 14968–14978, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03517" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.1c03517</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Zheng et al.(2025)Zheng, Webber, Heywood, Stevens, Stammerjohn, and Hall</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, Y., Webber, B. G. M., Heywood, K. J., Stevens, D. P., Stammerjohn, S. E., and Hall, R. A.: Upper-ocean processes and sea ice Production in the southeastern Amundsen Sea polynya in austral autumn, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 55, 43–58, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-24-0006.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-24-0006.1</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Cold lenses in the Amundsen Sea: impacts of sea ice formation  on subsurface pH and carbon</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Armi et al.(1988)Armi, Hebert, Oakey, Price, Richardson, Rossby, and
Ruddick</label><mixed-citation>
      
Armi, L., Hebert, D., Oakey, N., Price, J., Richardson, P. L., Rossby, T., and
Ruddick, B.: The history and decay of a Mediterranean salt lens, Nature, 333,
649–651, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/333649a0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/333649a0</a>, 1988.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Boehme et al.(2009)Boehme, Lovell, Biuw, Roquet, Nicholson, Thorpe,
Meredith, and Fedak</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boehme, L., Lovell, P., Biuw, M., Roquet, F., Nicholson, J., Thorpe, S. E., Meredith, M. P., and Fedak, M.: Technical Note: Animal-borne CTD-Satellite Relay Data Loggers for real-time oceanographic data collection, Ocean Sci., 5, 685–695, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-5-685-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-5-685-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Chelton et al.(1998)Chelton, deSzoeke, Schlax, Naggar, and
Siwertz</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chelton, D. B., deSzoeke, R. A., Schlax, M. G., Naggar, K. E., and Siwertz, N.:
Geographical variability of the first baroclinic Rossby radius of
deformation, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 28, 433–460,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0433:GVOTFB&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0433:GVOTFB&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Couto et al.(2017)Couto, Martinson, Kohut, and Schofield</label><mixed-citation>
      
Couto, N., Martinson, D. G., Kohut, J., and Schofield, O.: Distribution of
Upper Circumpolar Deep Water on the warming continental shelf of the West
Antarctic Peninsula, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 122,
5306–5315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC012840" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC012840</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Delille et al.(2014)Delille, Vancoppenolle, Geilfus, Tilbrook,
Lannuzel, Schoemann, Becquevort, Carnat, Delille, Lancelot, Chou, Dieckmann,
and Tison</label><mixed-citation>
      
Delille, B., Vancoppenolle, M., Geilfus, N.-X., Tilbrook, B., Lannuzel, D.,
Schoemann, V., Becquevort, S., Carnat, G., Delille, D., Lancelot, C., Chou,
L., Dieckmann, G. S., and Tison, J.-L.: Southern Ocean CO<sub>2</sub> sink: The
contribution of the sea ice, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119,
6340–6355, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC009941" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC009941</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Dickson et al.(2007)Dickson, Sabine, Christian, and
Organization.</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dickson, A. G. A. G., Sabine, C. L., Christian, J. R., and Organization., N. P.
M. S.: Guide to best practices for ocean CO<sub>2</sub> measurements, North Pacific
Marine Science Organization, ISBN 1897176074, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Gade(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gade, H. G.: Melting of Ice in Sea Water: A Primitive Model with Application to
the Antarctic Ice Shelf and Icebergs, Journal of Physical Oceanography, 9,
189–198,
1979.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Garau et al.(2011)Garau, Ruiz, Zhang, Pascual, Heslop, Kerfoot, and
Tintoré</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garau, B., Ruiz, S., Zhang, W. G., Pascual, A., Heslop, E., Kerfoot, J., and
Tintoré, J.: Thermal lag correction on Slocum CTD glider data, Journal
of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 28, 1065–1071,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-10-05030.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-10-05030.1</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Garcia amd Gordon(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garcia, H. E. and Gordon, L. I.: Oxygen solubility in seawater: Better fitting equations, Limnology and Oceanography, 37, 1307–1312,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1992.37.6.1307" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1992.37.6.1307</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Golledge et al.(2025)Golledge, Keller, Gossart, Malyarenko,
Bahamondes-Dominguez, Krapp, Jendersie, Lowry, Alevropoulos-Borrill, and
Notz</label><mixed-citation>
      
Golledge, N. R., Keller, E. D., Gossart, A., Malyarenko, A.,
Bahamondes-Dominguez, A., Krapp, M., Jendersie, S., Lowry, D. P.,
Alevropoulos-Borrill, A., and Notz, D.: Antarctic coastal polynyas in the
global climate system, Nature Reviews Earth &amp; Environment, 6, 126–139,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00634-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00634-x</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Ha et al.(2014)Ha, Wåhlin, Kim, Lee, Lee, Lee, Hong, Arneborg,
Björk, and Kalén</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ha, H. K., Wåhlin, A. K., Kim, T. W., Lee, S. H., Lee, J. H., Lee, H. J.,
Hong, C. S., Arneborg, L., Björk, G., and Kalén, O.: Circulation and
modification of Warm Deep Water on the central Amundsen Shelf, Journal of
Physical Oceanography, 44, 1493–1501, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-13-0240.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-13-0240.1</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Hahn(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hahn, J.: Oxygen variability and eddy-driven meridional oxygen supply in the
tropical North East Atlantic oxygen minimum zone, Ph.D. thesis,
Christian-Albrechts Universität Kiel,  URN: urn:nbn:de:gbv:8-diss-120325, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Hennig et al.(2024)Hennig, Mucciarone, Jacobs, Mortlock, and
Dunbar</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hennig, A. N., Mucciarone, D. A., Jacobs, S. S., Mortlock, R. A., and Dunbar, R. B.: Meteoric water and glacial melt in the southeastern Amundsen Sea: a time series from 1994 to 2020, The Cryosphere, 18, 791–818, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-791-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-791-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Heywood et al.(2016)Heywood, Biddle, Boehme, Dutrieux, Fedak,
Jenkins, Jones, Kaiser, Mallett, Garabato, Renfrew, Stevens, and
Webber</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heywood, K. J., Biddle, L. C., Boehme, L., Dutrieux, P., Fedak, M., Jenkins,
A., Jones, R. W., Kaiser, J., Mallett, H., Garabato, A. C. N., Renfrew,
I. A., Stevens, D. P., and Webber, B. G.: Between the devil and the deep blue
sea: The role of the Amundsen Sea continental shelf in exchanges between
ocean and ice shelves, Oceanography, 29, 118–129,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2016.104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2016.104</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Heywood et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heywood, K. J., Hall, R. A., Lee, G. A., Zheng, Y., Leadbitter, P., Rollo, C., Azaneu, M. D. C., Damerell, G., Mustafa, J. M., Oelerich, R., Queste, B. Y., Sheehan, P. M. F., Siddle, E., and Webber, B. G. M.: Temperature and salinity seaglider observations in the Amundsen Sea, Antarctica, January – February 2022, NERC EDS British Oceanographic Data Centre NOC [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5285/35b7832c-2432-fb41-e063-7086abc0c610" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5285/35b7832c-2432-fb41-e063-7086abc0c610</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Lee et al.(2017)Lee, Hwang, Ducklow, Hahm, Lee, Kim, Hyun, Park, Ha,
Kim, Yang, and Shin</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lee, S., Hwang, J., Ducklow, H. W., Hahm, D., Lee, S. H., Kim, D., Hyun, J.-H.,
Park, J., Ha, H. K., Kim, T.-W., Yang, E. J., and Shin, H. C.: Evidence of
minimal carbon sequestration in the productive Amundsen Sea polynya,
Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 7892–7899, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074646" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074646</a>,
2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Lopez et al.(2015)Lopez, Malardé, Danès, and
Gaspar</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lopez, R., Malardé, J.-P., Danès, P., and Gaspar, P.: Improving Argos
Doppler location using multiple-model smoothing, Animal Biotelemetry, 3,
1–9, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Marshall and Schott(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Marshall, J. and Schott, F.: Open-ocean convection: Observations, theory, and
models, Reviews of Geophysics, 37, 1–64, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98RG02739" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98RG02739</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>McDougall et al.(2010)McDougall, Feistel, Millero, Jackett, Wright,
King, Marion, Chen, and Spitzer</label><mixed-citation>
      
McDougall, T., Feistel, R., Millero, F., Jackett, D. R., Wright, D., King, B.,
Marion, G., Chen, C.-T. A., and Spitzer, P.: The International Thermodynamic
Equation of Seawater 2010 (TEOS-10): Calculation and use of thermodynamic
properties, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>McDowell and Rossby(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
      
McDowell, S. E. and Rossby, H. T.: Mediterranean water: An intense mesoscale
eddy off the Bahamas, Science, 202, 1085–1087,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.202.4372.1085" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.202.4372.1085</a>, 1978.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Meredith et al.(2008)Meredith, Brandon, Wallace, Clarke, Leng,
Renfrew, van Lipzig, and King</label><mixed-citation>
      
Meredith, M. P., Brandon, M. A., Wallace, M. I., Clarke, A., Leng, M. J.,
Renfrew, I. A., van Lipzig, N. P., and King, J. C.: Variability in the
freshwater balance of northern Marguerite Bay, Antarctic Peninsula: Results
from <i>δ</i><sup>18</sup>O, Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in
Oceanography, 55, 309–322, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.11.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.11.005</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Miles et al.(2016)Miles, Lee, Wåhlin, Ha, Kim, Assmann, and
Schofield</label><mixed-citation>
      
Miles, T., Lee, S. H., Wåhlin, A., Ha, H. K., Kim, T. W., Assmann, K. M., and
Schofield, O.: Glider observations of the Dotson Ice Shelf outflow,
Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 123, 16–29,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DSR2.2015.08.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DSR2.2015.08.008</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Millero(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Millero, F. J.: The marine inorganic carbon cycle, Chemical Reviews, 107,
308–341, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0503557" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0503557</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Morlighem(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Morlighem, M.: MEaSUREs BedMachine Antarctica, Version 3,  NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/FPSU0V1MWUB6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/FPSU0V1MWUB6</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Mu et al.(2014)Mu, Stammerjohn, Lowry, and Yager</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mu, L., Stammerjohn, S. E., Lowry, K. E., and Yager, P. L.: Spatial variability
of surface pCO<sub>2</sub> and air-sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux in the Amundsen Sea
Polynya, Antarctica, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 3,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000036</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Nakayama et al.(2024)Nakayama, Jourdain, van Caspel, Timmermann, and
De Rydt</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nakayama, Y., Jourdain, N., van Caspel, M., Timmermann, R., and De Rydt, J.:
MIPkit-A (MISOMIP2), Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10474700" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10474700</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Nomura and Yoshikawa-Inoue(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nomura, D. and Yoshikawa-Inoue, H.: The effect of sea-ice growth on air–sea
CO<sub>2</sub> flux in a tank experiment, Tellus B: Chemical and Physical
Meteorology, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00204.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00204.x</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>NSF/NERC ARTEMIS and ITGC TARSAN(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
NSF/NERC ARTEMIS and ITGC TARSAN: Vertical ocean profiles collected by a Conductivity-Temperature-Depth (CTD) package in the Amundsen Sea, U.S. Antarctic Program (USAP) Data Center [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.15784/601785" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.15784/601785</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Ohshima et al.(2013)Ohshima, Fukamachi, Williams, Nihashi, Roquet,
Kitade, Tamura, Hirano, Herraiz-Borreguero, Field, Hindell, Aoki, and
Wakatsuchi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ohshima, K. I., Fukamachi, Y., Williams, G. D., Nihashi, S., Roquet, F.,
Kitade, Y., Tamura, T., Hirano, D., Herraiz-Borreguero, L., Field, I.,
Hindell, M., Aoki, S., and Wakatsuchi, M.: Antarctic Bottom Water production
by intense sea-ice formation in the Cape Darnley polynya, Nature Geoscience,
6, 235–240, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1738" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1738</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Ohshima et al.(2016)Ohshima, Nihashi, and Iwamoto</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ohshima, K. I., Nihashi, S., and Iwamoto, K.: Global view of sea-ice production in polynyas and its linkage to dense/bottom water formation, Geoscience Letters, 3, 1–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-016-0045-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-016-0045-4</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Östlund and Hut(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Östlund, H. G. and Hut, G.: Arctic Ocean water mass balance from isotope
data, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 89, 6373–6381,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC089iC04p06373" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JC089iC04p06373</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Pickup et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pickup D. D., Hammermeister, E., Loucaides, S., Lee, G. A., Bakker, D. C. E., Heywood, K. J., Hall, R. A., Yager, P. L., and Queste, B. Y.: pH measurements using a Lab-on-Chip sensor on a Seaglider in the Amundsen Sea, Antarctica, January – February 2022, version 2, NERC EDS British Oceanographic Data Centre NOC [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5285/33d1f143-47b5-a7d1-e063-7086abc03081" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5285/33d1f143-47b5-a7d1-e063-7086abc03081</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Queste et al.(2012)Queste, Heywood, Kaiser, Lee, Matthews, Schmidtko,
Walker-Brown, and Woodward</label><mixed-citation>
      
Queste, B. Y., Heywood, K. J., Kaiser, J., Lee, G. A., Matthews, A., Schmidtko,
S., Walker-Brown, C., and Woodward, S. W.: Deployments in extreme conditions:
Pushing the boundaries of Seaglider capabilities, ISBN 9781457720567,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/AUV.2012.6380740" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/AUV.2012.6380740</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Randall-Goodwin et al.(2015)Randall-Goodwin, Meredith, Jenkins,
Yager, Sherrell, Abrahamsen, Gurero, Yuan, Mortlock, Gavahan, Alderkamp,
Ducklow, Robertson, and Stammerjohn</label><mixed-citation>
      
Randall-Goodwin, E., Meredith, M. P., Jenkins, A., Yager, P. L., Sherrell,
R. M., Abrahamsen, E. P., Gurero, R., Yuan, X., Mortlock, R. A., Gavahan, K.,
Alderkamp, A. C., Ducklow, H., Robertson, R., and Stammerjohn, S. E.:
Freshwater distributions and water mass structure in the Amundsen Sea
Polynya region, Antarctica, Elementa, 3,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000065" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000065</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Rysgaard et al.(2007)Rysgaard, Glud, Sejr, Bendtsen, and
Christensen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rysgaard, S., Glud, R. N., Sejr, M. K., Bendtsen, J., and Christensen, P. B.:
Inorganic carbon transport during sea ice growth and decay: A carbon pump in
polar seas, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 112,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003572" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003572</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Rysgaard et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rysgaard, S., Bendtsen, J., Delille, B., Dieckmann, G. S., Glud, R. N.,  Kennedy, H., Mortensen, J., Papadimitriou, S., Thomas, D. N., and Tison,  J.-L.: Sea ice contribution to the air–sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange in the Arctic and  Southern Oceans, Tellus B, 63, 823–830,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00571.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00571.x</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Savidge et al.(2023)Savidge, Snow, Siegfried, Zheng, Bôas,
Bortolotto, Boehme, and Alley</label><mixed-citation>
      
Savidge, E., Snow, T., Siegfried, M. R., Zheng, Y., Bôas, A. B. V.,   Bortolotto, G. A., Boehme, L., and Alley, K. E.: Wintertime polynya structure  and variability from thermal remote sensing and seal-borne observations at  Pine Island Glacier, West Antarctica, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and  Remote Sensing, 61, 1–13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3271453" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3271453</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Spreen et al.(2008)Spreen, Kaleschke, and Heygster</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spreen, G., Kaleschke, L., and Heygster, G.: Sea ice remote sensing using AMSR-E 89 GHz channels, J. Geophys. Res., 113, C02S03, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003384" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003384</a>, 2008 (data available at: <a href="https://data.seaice.uni-bremen.de" target="_blank"/>, last access: 5 March 2025).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Stammerjohn(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stammerjohn, S.: Vertical ocean profiles collected by a
Conductivity-Temperature-Depth (CTD) package in the Amundsen Sea, U.S. Antarctic Program (USAP) Data Center [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.15784/601785" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.15784/601785</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Steiger et al.(2021)Steiger, Darelius, Wåhlin, and
Assmann</label><mixed-citation>
      
Steiger, N., Darelius, E., Wåhlin, A. K., and Assmann, K. M.: Intermittent
reduction in ocean heat transport into the Getz Ice Shelf cavity during
strong wind events, Geophysical Research Letters, 48, e2021GL093599,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093599" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093599</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Tamura et al.(2008)Tamura, Ohshima, and Nihashi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tamura, T., Ohshima, K. I., and Nihashi, S.: Mapping of sea ice production for
Antarctic coastal polynyas, Geophysical Research Letters, 35, 7606,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032903" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032903</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Wadhams et al.(2002)Wadhams, Holfort, Hansen, and
Wilkinson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wadhams, P., Holfort, J., Hansen, E., and Wilkinson, J. P.: A deep convective   chimney in the winter Greenland Sea, Geophysical Research Letters, 29, 76-1–76-4,  2002.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Wåhlin et al.(2010)Wåhlin, Yuan, Björk, and
Nohr</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wåhlin, A. K., Yuan, X., Björk, G., and Nohr, C.: Inflow of warm
Circumpolar Deep Water in the central Amundsen shelf, Journal of
Physical Oceanography, 40, 1427–1434, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JPO4431.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JPO4431.1</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Williams et al.(2008)Williams, Bindoff, Marsland, and
Rintoul</label><mixed-citation>
      
Williams, G. D., Bindoff, N. L., Marsland, S. J., and Rintoul, S. R.: Formation
and export of dense shelf water from the Adélie Depression, East Antarctica,
Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004346" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004346</a>,
2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Yager et al.(2012)Yager, Sherrell, Stammerjohn, Alderkamp, Schofield,
Abrahamsen, Arrigo, Bertilsson, Garay, Guerrero, Lowry, Moksnes, Ndungo,
Post, Randall-Goodwin, Riemann, Severmann, Thatje, van Dijken, and
Wilson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yager, P., Sherrell, R., Stammerjohn, S., Alderkamp, A.-C., Schofield, O.,
Abrahamsen, P., Arrigo, K., Bertilsson, S., Garay, L., Guerrero, R., Lowry,
K., Moksnes, P.-O., Ndungo, K., Post, A., Randall-Goodwin, E., Riemann, L.,
Severmann, S., Thatje, S., van Dijken, G., and Wilson, S.: ASPIRE: The
Amundsen Sea Polynya International Research Expedition,
Oceanography, 25, 40–53, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2012.73" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2012.73</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Yager et al.(2016)Yager, Sherrell, Stammerjohn, Ducklow, Schofield,
Ingall, Wilson, Lowry, Williams, Riemann, Bertilsson, Alderkamp, Dinasquet,
Logares, Richert, Sipler, Melara, Mu, Newstead, Post, Swalethorp, and van
Dijken</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yager, P., Sherrell, R., Stammerjohn, S., Ducklow, H., Schofield, O., Ingall,
E., Wilson, S., Lowry, K., Williams, C., Riemann, L., Bertilsson, S.,
Alderkamp, A.-C., Dinasquet, J., Logares, R., Richert, I., Sipler, R.,
Melara, A., Mu, L., Newstead, R., Post, A., Swalethorp, R., and van Dijken,
G.: A carbon budget for the Amundsen Sea Polynya, Antarctica:
Estimating net community production and export in a highly productive polar
ecosystem, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 4,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000140" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000140</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Yang et al.(2022)Yang, Kim, Dutrieux, Wåhlin, Jenkins, Ha, Kim, Cho,
Park, Lee, and Cho</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, H. W., Kim, T. W., Dutrieux, P., Wåhlin, A. K., Jenkins, A., Ha, H. K.,
Kim, C. S., Cho, K. H., Park, T., Lee, S. H., and Cho, Y. K.: Seasonal
variability of ocean circulation near the Dotson Ice Shelf,
Antarctica, Nature Communications, 13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28751-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28751-5</a>,
2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Yin et al.(2021)Yin, Papadimitriou, Rérolle, Arundell, Cardwell,
Walk, Palmer, Fowell, Schaap, Mowlem, and Loucaides</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yin, T., Papadimitriou, S., Rérolle, V. M. C., Arundell, M., Cardwell, C. L.,
Walk, J., Palmer, M. R., Fowell, S. E., Schaap, A., Mowlem, M. C., and
Loucaides, S.: A novel Lab-on-Chip Spectrophotometric pH sensor for
autonomous in situ seawater measurements to 6000 m depth on stationary and
moving observing platforms, Environmental Science &amp; Technology, 55,
14968–14978, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03517" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03517</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Zheng et al.(2025)Zheng, Webber, Heywood, Stevens, Stammerjohn, and
Hall</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zheng, Y., Webber, B. G. M., Heywood, K. J., Stevens, D. P., Stammerjohn,
S. E., and Hall, R. A.: Upper-ocean processes and sea ice Production in the
southeastern Amundsen Sea polynya in austral autumn, Journal of Physical
Oceanography, 55, 43–58, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-24-0006.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-24-0006.1</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
