<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \bartext{Research article}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">OS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Ocean Science</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">OS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ocean Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1812-0792</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/os-19-535-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>Joint observation–model mixed-layer heat and salt budgets in the eastern
tropical Atlantic</article-title><alt-title>Joint observation-model mixed-layer heat and salt budgets</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Joint observation-model mixed-layer heat and salt budgets}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{R.~Dorgeless~Ngakala et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Ngakala</surname><given-names>Roy Dorgeless</given-names></name>
          <email>roy.ngakala@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Alory</surname><given-names>Gaël</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9670-2194</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Da-Allada</surname><given-names>Casimir Yélognissè</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kom</surname><given-names>Olivia Estelle</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Jouanno</surname><given-names>Julien</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7750-060X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Rath</surname><given-names>Willi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1951-8494</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Baloïtcha</surname><given-names>Ezinvi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Oceanography and Applications, International Chair in
Mathematical Physics and Applications, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>University of Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou,
Benin</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Oceanography and Environment, Institut National de
Recherche en Sciences <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Exactes et Naturelles, Pointe-Noire, Congo</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Laboratoire d'Etudes en Géophysique et Océanographie
Spatiales, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Laboratoire de Géosciences, de l'Environnement et Applications,
Université Nationale des Sciences Technologies, Ingénierie et
Mathématiques, Abomey, Benin</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Laboratoire d'Hydrologie Marine et Côtière, Institut de
Recherches Halieutiques et Océanologiques du Bénin,  <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Cotonou, Benin</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>GEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel, Kiel, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Roy Dorgeless Ngakala (roy.ngakala@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>5</day><month>May</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>535</fpage><lpage>558</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>11</day><month>November</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>16</day><month>November</month><year>2022</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>31</day><month>March</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>31</day><month>March</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 Roy Dorgeless Ngakala et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023.html">This article is available from https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e177">In this study, we use a joint observation–model approach
to investigate the mixed-layer heat and salt annual mean as well as seasonal
budgets in the eastern tropical Atlantic. The regional PREFCLIM (PREFACE Climatology)
observational climatology provides the budget terms with a relatively low
spatial and temporal resolution compared to the online NEMO (Nucleus for European Modeling
of the Ocean; Madec, G., 2014) model, and this
is later resampled as in PREFCLIM climatology. In addition, advection
terms are recomputed offline from the model as PREFCLIM gridded advection
computation. In the Senegal, Angola, and Benguela regions, the seasonal cycle of
mixed-layer temperature is mainly governed by surface heat fluxes; however,
it is essentially driven by vertical heat diffusion in the equatorial region.
The seasonal cycle of mixed-layer salinity is largely controlled by
freshwater flux in the Senegal and Benguela regions; however, it follows the
variability of zonal and meridional salt advection in the equatorial and Angola
regions, respectively. Our results show that the time-averaged spatial
distribution of NEMO offline heat and salt advection terms compares much better
to PREFCLIM horizontal advection terms than the online heat and salt advection
terms. However, the seasonal cycle of horizontal advection in selected
regions shows that NEMO offline terms do not always compare well with
PREFCLIM, sometimes less than online terms. Despite this difference, these
results suggest the important role of small-scale variability in mixed-layer
heat and salt budgets.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e189">The interaction between ocean and atmosphere plays a crucial role in the
climate system. This interaction involves heat and freshwater fluxes, which
affect temperature and salinity variations in the upper-oceanic mixed layer.
Therefore, sea surface temperature and salinity (SST, SSS) are two key
climate variables, and understanding the balance of processes determining
their variability is a key requirement to accurately simulating the climate
system.</p>
      <p id="d1e192">In the eastern tropical Atlantic, seasonal climate variability is mostly
associated with the West African monsoon (WAM) and strongly linked with SST
and SSS variations. SST is characterized here by a strong seasonal cycle,
which influences the regional climate, particularly the large-scale
atmospheric circulation and rainfall over the ocean and African continent
(Carton
and Zhou, 1997; Foltz et al., 2013; Kushnir<?pagebreak page536?> et al., 2006). In the Gulf of
Guinea, the seasonal formation of the Atlantic cold tongue (ACT), associated
with equatorial upwelling, is the main feature associated with SST seasonal
variations (Chang
et al., 2006; Peter et al., 2006; Caniaux et al., 2011). This seasonal
cooling creates an intense meridional SST front that enhances southern trade
winds and shifts the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) northward, which
triggers the WAM
(Philander
and Pacanowski, 1981; Picaut, 1983; Waliser and Gautier, 1993; Caniaux et
al., 2011). In the Angola–Benguela frontal zone off southwestern Africa,
SST variability also has an impact on coastal precipitation
(Reason and Rouault, 2006). Conversely, the atmospheric
conditions in the eastern tropical Atlantic impact SST, as trade winds are
the main driver of eastern boundary upwelling systems found along the coasts
of Angola–Namibia and Senegal–Mauritania.</p>
      <p id="d1e195">Like SST, SSS is an essential climate variable. Its variations are closely
linked to the global hydrological cycle, as freshwater exchanges between the
ocean and atmosphere control its mean large-scale distribution
(Durack and
Wijffels, 2010; Bingham et al., 2012): regions of high SSS are dominated by
evaporation, while regions of low SSS are dominated by precipitation. In the
eastern tropical Atlantic, the intense precipitation under the ITCZ has a
strong impact on seasonal variability of SSS. For example, off Senegal and
Guinea, SSS decreases in boreal fall following the period when the ITCZ reaches
its most northern position, which leads to a maximum in precipitation and
runoff from Senegal and Gambia rivers
(Camara et al., 2015). The eastern tropical
Atlantic is indeed characterized by low SSS plumes due to strong river
discharges, including the Congo River (the second-largest outflow in the
world after the Amazon River) and the Niger River in the Gulf of Guinea. SSS
variations are also associated with upwelling. In the equatorial Atlantic,
SSS increases during the development of the Atlantic cold tongue (ACT) in
boreal spring–summer
(Schlundt et al.,
2014; Da-Allada et al., 2014). Summer upwelling at the northern coast of the
Gulf of Guinea also increases coastal SSS (Alory et
al., 2021). Off Angola, relatively high SSS is observed during the upwelling
season in August, while low SSS appears in March and October–November
(Kopte et al.,
2017; Awo et al., 2022). In the Benguela upwelling system further south, the
maximum in SSS appears in April and the minimum in October
(Junker et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e198">SST and SSS have already been the focus of several studies in the eastern
tropical Atlantic. Studies only based on observations (in situ and/or
satellite), and others combining observational data and model data, show a
variety of physical processes contributing to the heat and salt budget with a
different balance from one region to another
(Foltz
et al., 2003; Foltz and McPhaden, 2008; Da-Allada et al., 2013, 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e202">In the northern tropical Atlantic far from the coast, the heat budget is
largely driven by surface heat fluxes, essentially solar radiation varying
with the cloudy ITCZ position (Carton and Zhou, 1997).
Off northwestern Africa in the Senegal region, the seasonal cycle of SST is
associated with coastal upwelling modulated by the seasonal variations of
alongshore winds. In the equatorial zone, the mixed-layer heat budget is
mainly controlled by surface heat fluxes, of which mainly the solar
radiation is important
(Carton
and Zhou, 1997; Foltz et al., 2003; Yu et al., 2006). The dominance of the
surface heat flux is highlighted by a recent study based on PIRATA buoy data
off the Equator, in particular at the 6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E
position. At this latitude, seasonal variations in SST governed by solar
flux and latent heat flux are shown to be associated with the meridional
migration of the ITCZ and the formation of low-level marine stratocumulus
(Scannell and McPhaden, 2018). However, other
oceanic processes can also play an important role in the seasonal heat
budget. These include zonal advection and vertical mixing, which are
important during the formation of the ACT
(Foltz
et al., 2003; Hummels et al., 2014; Schlundt et al., 2014). However, the
influence of vertical mixing in the heat budget remains low in the eastern
(from 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E to the coast of Africa) compared to the central
equatorial Atlantic
(Jouanno et
al., 2011; Hummels et al., 2013). This is explained by the strong
stratification in the eastern equatorial Atlantic due to the transport of
low-salinity and warm waters from the Gulf of Guinea, which contributes to
reducing the vertical mixing. The low salinity is associated with the intense
precipitation and important freshwater intakes from the Niger and Congo
rivers in the Gulf of Guinea. Off Angola, annual variability of SST is
driven by meridional wind stress, causing coastal upwelling, and thermocline
depth variations forced by remote equatorial effects
(Carton and Zhou, 1997).</p>
      <p id="d1e232">In the northeastern tropical Atlantic, including in the Senegal region, the
salt budget is controlled by freshwater fluxes. The net mixed-layer salinity
variations are, however, weak because of the compensation between the
atmospheric and oceanic terms (Camara et
al., 2015). In the eastern equatorial Atlantic and Gulf of Guinea,
horizontal advection and vertical mixing play a dominant role in determining
the seasonal cycle of salt budget, which cannot be explained by freshwater
fluxes only
(Tzortzi
et al., 2013; Da-Allada et al., 2013, 2014). This dominance of zonal
advection and vertical processes extends southward and in the Angola coastal
region (Camara et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e235">In addition, it can be noted that various approaches have been used to
estimate the heat and salt budgets in the tropical Atlantic, in
particular the advection terms. Foltz
et al. (2003) analyzed the mixed-layer heat balance at PIRATA mooring
locations, where they computed the heat advection from monthly gridded
climatologies of near-surface horizontal velocity, based on ship drifts and
Lagrangian drifters, and SST gradient fields based on a combination of ship,
buoy, and satellite data. Wade et al. (2011)
used a similar SST product but satellite-derived currents to estimate the heat advection every
10 d at positions of Argo profiles. Then monthly
averages in nine boxes covering the Gulf of Guinea were used to study the
seasonal cycle of mixed-layer heat as<?pagebreak page537?> observed by Argo.
Da-Allada et al. (2013) developed
an original mixed-layer model of the tropical Atlantic at monthly,
1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution, with salinity driven by observation-based
climatological freshwater budget terms, and several in situ and satellite
surface currents products were tested for advection to identify processes
driving SSS seasonal variations. With the same objective,
Da-Allada et al. (2014) and
Camara et al. (2015) used slightly
different tropical Atlantic configurations of the NEMO (Nucleus for European Modeling
of the Ocean; Madec, G., 2014) OGCM (ocean general
circulation model), with mixed-layer salinity budget terms computed
online, on the model spatial grid (0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and at each time step
(20 min). We know from analyzing online diagnostics that the nonlinear
advective terms cannot be neglected. Observational data, however, often have
lower temporal and/or spatial resolution than would be necessary to fully
capture the nonlinear terms. Moreover, it is much more difficult to estimate
subsurface vertical terms than surface terms with observations; this leads
to a non-negligible residual term, which interpretation is problematic.
Online computation in an OGCM is practically the only way to close a
mixed-layer heat and salt budget.</p>
      <p id="d1e256">Nonlinear terms are associated with turbulence. In eddy-resolving models,
they represent mesoscale activity related to eddies and tropical instability
waves (TIWs). The characteristic size of eddies is given by the Rossby
radius, which increases equatorward and has a minimum value of 30–40 km in
the 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N subtropical band
(Chelton et al., 1998). TIWs have been shown to
play an important role in the heat budget in the central equatorial Atlantic
(Foltz
et al., 2003; Grodsky et al., 2005; Jochum et al., 2005; Peter et al., 2006;
Lee et al., 2014; Heukamp et al., 2022; Tuchen et al., 2022). In the
tropical Atlantic, eddies have been detected mostly in coastal upwelling
systems, where they are likely to affect mixed-layer heat and salt budgets too
(Djakouré et al.,
2014; Aguedjou et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e277">In this paper, we exploit for the first time a recently produced tropical
Atlantic mixed-layer heat and salt budget observation-based climatology.
Moreover, we use a joint observation–model approach that has rarely been
used: we compare the mixed-layer heat and salt budget terms estimated from
observations to those simulated by a high-resolution OGCM simulation in the
eastern tropical Atlantic. A sensitivity test to the spatiotemporal
resolution at which advection terms are computed in the model is conducted.
This comparison should allow providing a high-level model validation,
isolating the contribution of mesoscale advection in the mixed-layer
budgets, and quantifying the uncertainty in the different budget terms. We
particularly focus for the mixed-layer budgets on the upwelling regions
where oceanic processes are expected to be dominant. The observational
product, the model, and the methodology used are presented in Sect. 2.
Section 3 contains the results of observation–model comparison regarding
mean heat and salt budgets, as well as their seasonal variability in selected
regions. In Sect. 4, a discussion and conclusion are presented.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>2.1.1</label><title>Observations</title>
      <p id="d1e302">We use the PREFCLIM (PREFACE Climatology) observed seasonal climatology of
mixed-layer heat and salt budgets covering the eastern tropical Atlantic
(Rath et al., 2016). It has been produced in the
framework of the European PREFACE (Enhancing prediction of tropical Atlantic
climate and its impacts) project, which aimed at improving climate models in
the tropical Atlantic. This monthly climatology is derived from all
hydrographic data publicly available covering the region, including Argo
float data (Argo, 2000) and glider measurements conducted by GEOMAR
between 2002 and 2015 (for more details, see <uri>https://gliderweb.geomar.de</uri>, last access: 27 April 2023),
also completed by data from hydrographic stations in Senegal, Angola, and
Namibia waters collected during cruises of the EAF-Nansen. In addition, this
climatology uses data from other projects of PREFACE partners like PIRATA
(Prediction and Research Moored Array in the Tropical Atlantic,
Bourlès et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e308">These data have been gridded using an interpolation scheme including
isobath-following and front-sharpening components
(Schmidtko et al.,
2013). Mixed-layer properties like temperature, salinity, and depth are
provided with a spatial resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
while mixed-layer budget terms and horizontal velocities used to compute
advection terms are given with a lower spatial resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mixed-layer depth (MLD) is computed following the
Holte and Talley (2009) method. For individual ocean profiles, this hybrid
method models the general shape of each profile, searches for physical
features in the profile, and calculates the MLD by using threshold and
gradient methods to form a suite of possible MLD values. Then it analyzes
the patterns associated with this formed suite in order to select a final
MLD estimate. Surface heat fluxes are derived from the TropFlux data set
(Kumar et al., 2012), the freshwater
flux associated with evaporation is computed from latent heat flux of
TropFlux, and precipitation is derived from GPCP (Global Precipitation
Climatology Project) version 2.2
(Huffman et al., 2009). Heat and salt
horizontal advection terms (split into zonal and meridional components) have
been calculated using the near-surface gridded velocity field based on the
measurements of surface drifters (Lumpkin et al.,
2013) and Argo floats from the YOMAHA data set
(Lebedev et al., 2007), which is combined with a
gridded temperature and salinity gradient field. These will be called the
gridded advection terms. This climatology was supplemented with an additional
product of heat and salt<?pagebreak page538?> advection using estimated velocities from each of the
drifter and float data points used for the gridded velocity fields combined
with the full high-resolution hydrographic climatology. These alternative
terms of heat and salt advection will be called Lagrangian advection terms here
and denoted by Obs-drift to highlight the difference from the previous
terms. The full description of this climatology is presented in a PREFACE
project deliverable (Dengler and Rath, 2015).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>2.1.2</label><title>Model</title>
      <p id="d1e359">We use a regional configuration of the NEMO (Nucleus for European Modeling
of the Ocean; Madec, G., 2014) oceanic model version 3.6. This regional
simulation covers the tropical Atlantic (35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>–35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
100<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W–15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). It uses a horizontal Arakawa grid of
type C, with a 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal resolution. The vertical grid, in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> coordinates, has 75 levels, including 12 levels within the upper 20 and
24 m in the upper 100 m of the ocean. The model is forced by daily outputs of
the global MERCATOR reanalysis GLORYS2V3 at lateral boundaries. Atmospheric
fluxes of heat, fresh water, and momentum used for surface forcing are from
the DRAKKAR Forcing Set version 5.2 (DFS5.2) product (Dussin et
al., 2016). The surface fluxes are prescribed following a bulk formula
(Large and Yeager, 2009). River
runoff is introduced as surface fresh water at river mouths and is based on
a monthly climatology (Dai and Trenberth, 2002). Heat and
salt budget terms are computed online, at each model time step (20 min), and
vertically integrated in the mixed layer. The mixed-layer depth is computed
following a density criterion: a 0.03 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> difference relative to the
density at 10 m (de Boyer Montégut
et al., 2004). The description of this model is more detailed in
Hernandez et al. (2016). In this
paper, we use climatological monthly averages of mixed-layer properties
averaged for the 1980–2015 period to compare with similar terms available
from observations. This climatological approach is used in many studies on the
mixed-layer budget
(Da-Allada et al., 2014;
Camara et al., 2015). This NEMO regional configuration has already been used
to study the Gulf of Guinea salinity distribution and variability at
seasonal and interannual timescales
(Da-Allada
et al., 2017; Awo et al., 2018).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d1e445">In this paper, the driving processes of the seasonal variability of mixed-layer
temperature and salinity in selected regions are quantified through heat and
salt budgets from the NEMO model. This approach has been already used in several
studies based on observations and models
(Da-Allada
et al., 2013; Hasson et al., 2013). In the following, as mixed-layer
temperature and salinity are very close to SST and SSS, respectively, we
indifferently use the vocabulary. The heat budget evolution and salt budget
evolution within the mixed layer are respectively given by
Eqs. (1) and (2), already used in previous studies
(Peter
et al., 2006; Jouanno et al., 2011; Da-Allada et al., 2014; Schlundt et al.,
2014):

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M18" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SST</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:munder></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:munder></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8.5}{8.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SST</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SSS</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SSS</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:munder></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:munder></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8.6}{8.6}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SSS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:munder><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:munder class="underbrace"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SSS</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is salinity, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mixed-layer depth; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>U</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are the zonal, meridional, and vertical components of the
velocity vector; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>l</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(.) is lateral diffusion. In Eq. (1),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the non-solar and solar components of
surface heat flux, respectively, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the fraction of
shortwave radiation reaching depths below the base of the mixed layer (and
hence not available for heating up the mixed layer itself).</p>
      <p id="d1e1054">The left-hand side of Eq. (1) represents the mixed-layer temperature
tendency term, and the right-hand side represents all terms contributing to
the heat budget. Namely, term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the surface heat flux decomposed (from
left to right) into non-solar flux (longwave, latent heat, sensible heat) and
solar flux (shortwave). Term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is horizontal temperature advection,
decomposed into zonal and meridional components, term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is lateral
temperature diffusion, and term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents vertical oceanic processes.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> contains (from left to right) vertical temperature advection, vertical
temperature diffusion at the base of the mixed layer, and entrainment that
represents mixed-layer temperature variations due to changes in the
mixed-layer depth.</p>
      <?pagebreak page539?><p id="d1e1092">The left-hand side of Eq. (2) represents the mixed-layer salinity
tendency term, and the right-hand side represents all terms contributing to the
salt budget. Namely, term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ocean–atmosphere freshwater flux, which
includes evaporation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and precipitation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is horizontal
salinity advection, decomposed into zonal and meridional components, term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is lateral salinity diffusion, and term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents vertical oceanic
processes. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> contains (from left to right) vertical salinity advection,
vertical salinity diffusion at the base of the mixed layer, and entrainment due
to changes in the mixed-layer depth. The last term, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, represents the
local river runoff (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contribution.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1175">Annual mean of mixed-layer depth from observations <bold>(a)</bold> and the model <bold>(b)</bold>. The rectangles in <bold>(a)</bold> correspond to the four regions of study.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1193">The budget computation slightly differs between the observation-based
climatology and the model data. All terms are computed online in the NEMO
model, explicitly from Eqs. (1) and (2), except for the entrainment term
that is estimated (using the online advection term) as a residual. In the
PREFCLIM observed climatology, equations for the heat and salt budgets are
simplified, as done in other studies
(Stevenson
and Niiler, 1983; Foltz et al., 2003, 2004; Delcroix and Henin, 1991;
Schlundt et al., 2014). Only the tendency, surface heat or freshwater flux
(term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and advection terms (term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are computed explicitly, following
Eqs. (1) and (2). The residual is composed of unresolved vertical
processes like diapycnal heat and salt fluxes, runoff contribution in the
case of the salt budget, and accumulated errors from the explicitly resolved
terms that can be due to sub-mesoscale activity (Dengler and Rath, 2015).
For comparison between observations and the model, terms <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (1) as well as terms <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (2) are grouped in a model
pseudo-residual term equivalent to the observation residual. The daily NEMO
model online budget terms, available on a 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid, are
resampled at the lower spatial resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and time resolution (monthly) of observed budget terms for comparison. The
online computation in the model means that the advection term includes
high-frequency mesoscale activity. To remove this part and to mimic the
resolution of the gridded observations used for the PREFCLIM advection
terms, horizontal heat and salt advection terms are also recomputed offline,
following Eqs. (1) and (2), with monthly model outputs of currents as well as
temperature and salinity resampled at 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  resolution. This
approach has been used in another salinity budget in the tropical Pacific
(Hasson et al., 2013). In
addition, a new pseudo-residual is inferred from Eqs. (1) and (2) where
advection is calculated offline and called the offline pseudo-residual. In order
to evaluate the consistency between the PREFCLIM and  NEMO mixed-layer
budget climatology, we use common statistics of root mean square deviation
(RMSD), standard deviation, and spatial and temporal correlations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and we
summarize them using Taylor diagrams (Taylor, 2001).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Mixed-layer properties</title>
      <p id="d1e1317">A preliminary validation of the NEMO regional simulation is done by
comparing modeled and observed annual means of mixed-layer depth,
mixed-layer temperature, and  mixed-layer salinity, as well as the standard deviation
of the latter two. The model (Fig. 1b) reproduces the large-scale properties
of observed MLD (Fig. 1a) in the eastern tropical Atlantic. In both
observations and the model, the shallowest mixed layer is found along the
Equator and the coasts of Africa, while the deepest mixed layer is found
towards the northern and southern subtropical gyres. The main differences
between the modeled and observed MLD are found along the northern coast of
the Gulf of Guinea and along 24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S where the model MLD is
shallower and along 12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S where the model MLD is deeper (see
Fig. A1 in the Appendix). Also, the MLD spatial variations are smoother in the observed
product than in the model, despite a similar 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial
resolution. This is likely due to the fact that the observations
underestimate spatial variability because they are not available at the
necessary resolution.</p>
      <p id="d1e1347">The model (Fig. 2b) reproduces the observed mean SST (Fig. 2a) in the
eastern tropical Atlantic well. The highest SST is found along the zonal band between
0 and 12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, while the lowest SST is found in the Benguela
and Canary Current regions south of 12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and north of
18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, respectively, which are characterized by eastern boundary
upwelling systems (EBUSs, Chavez
and Messié, 2009). The coastal cooling in the Benguela region is weaker
in the model. The cooling associated with the smaller coastal upwelling
region north of the Gulf of Guinea
(Djakouré et
al., 2014, 2017) appears in the model only. The model and observations show
similar large-scale patterns of SST seasonal variability (Fig. 2c–d) with an
open-ocean minimum between 12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, at the coast
around 24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, and maximum variability in the
open ocean south of 24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, at the coast around 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and
12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. However, the model shows a smaller coastal seasonal
variability of SST at 12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S compared to the PREFCLIM climatology and
a larger variability in the open ocean south of 24<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, and it
captures the variability associated with the coastal upwelling north of the
Gulf of Guinea that does not appear in PREFCLIM. These differences are
probably associated with the strengths and weaknesses in the two data
sources. On the one hand, there is variable observational coverage, from the
very densely sampled EAF-Nansen data along the shore to generally lower
observational coverage in the regions away from the shores. On the other
hand, the wind forcing used for the model may not allow fully capturing the
nearshore variability (Junker et al.,
2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e1460">The model (Fig. 3b) also represents the main observed features of SSS (Fig. 3a) in the eastern tropical Atlantic. The highest SSS is found towards the
center of both the northern and southern subtropical gyres. In contrast,
the lowest SSS is found slightly north of the Equator and in the Gulf of
Guinea due to the strong precipitation associated with the ITCZ and river
runoff. SSS is also relatively low in the Benguela upwelling region. SSS is
lower in the model than in observations in the eastern part of the Gulf of
Guinea, but higher along 12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (see Fig. A1). Except for the
Benguela region, the model (Fig. 3d) shows a strong SSS variability
associated with low-SSS regions. However, the PREFCLIM climatology (Fig. 3b)
shows a much weaker variability than the model in the Gulf of Guinea and
around the Niger River in particular. This may be due to a poor temporal
resolution of<?pagebreak page540?> SSS observations available here. Off the Niger River mouth,
the model is in better agreement with other observation-based SSS products,
showing a strong (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> psu) variability here
(Da-Allada et al., 2014).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1485">Annual <bold>(a, b)</bold> and standard deviation <bold>(c, d)</bold> of
mixed-layer temperature from observations <bold>(a, c)</bold> and the model <bold>(b, d)</bold>. The rectangles in the bottom panels correspond to the four regions of
study.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1506">In the following part, the heat and salt budgets will be investigated in detail
for four boxes, covering oceanic regions of similar size, selected for their
particularly low mean SST and SSS and/or strong SST and SSS variability, as well as
generally being associated with upwelling. These are, from north to south, the
Senegal box (6–20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 20–15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), the equatorial box (2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), the Angola box (15–5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 7.5–15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), and the Benguela box
(30–17.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 10–17.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)
(Figs. 1–3). Note that these boxes result from a trade-off as we choose to
keep the same boxes for heat and salt budgets for consistency. The
equatorial and Angola boxes include areas of high and low variability in
SSS. The eastern half of the equatorial box is more influenced by the Niger
and Congo River plumes than its western half
(Jouanno et al.,
2011; Da-Allada et al., 2017). The northern half of the Angola box is more
influenced by the Congo River plume than its southern half, as mentioned by
Awo et al. (2022).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1602">Annual mean <bold>(a, b)</bold> and standard deviation <bold>(c, d)</bold> of
mixed-layer salinity from observations <bold>(a, c)</bold> and the model <bold>(b, d)</bold>. The rectangles in the bottom panels correspond to the four boxes of
study.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Mixed-layer heat budget</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Time-averaged spatial variations</title>
      <p id="d1e1638">We compared the mean mixed-layer heat budget from the model and observations.
The surface heat flux and horizontal heat advection maps are presented in
Fig. 4. Surface heat flux from observations is positive everywhere in the
eastern tropical Atlantic, with a maximum along the Equator that gets the
strongest solar flux, and along the west coasts of Africa (Fig. 4a). Along
West African coasts, the heat flux is strong as solar flux can concentrate
in a thin mixed layer (Fig. 1), notably due to the strong salinity
stratification induced by the Niger and Congo rivers in the Gulf of Guinea. In
addition, the temperature difference between the ocean cooled by coastal
upwelling (Benguela, Senegal, see Fig. 2) and the atmosphere leads to a
reduced latent heat flux. The model reproduces the observed patterns with
higher resolution (Fig. 4c) and, when resampled similarly (Fig. 4b), shows
good spatial agreement with the PREFCLIM climatology (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The
seasonal variations of the NEMO and PREFCLIM heat fluxes are also very well
correlated except along the Equator (Fig. 4d). However, the NEMO model flux
is biased low compared to PREFCLIM. It shows a net flux towards the
atmosphere along zonal bands around 6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S.
These differences can be explained by the different data sources used for
surface heat flux in the PREFCLIM climatology (TropFlux) and as forcing for
the NEMO model (DFS5.2), but also due to the feedback of simulated oceanic
conditions on the heat fluxes through bulk formulae in the model.</p>
      <p id="d1e1671">As expected, there are important differences between the maps of offline
heat advection, calculated based on the coarsened model currents and
hydrography (Fig. 4f), and the online heat advection taking into account the
full spatiotemporal variability (Fig. 4g, resampled to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
after calculating advection). In the online version, advection acts to cool
the mixed layer in a thinner western equatorial band and to mainly warm the
mixed layer in a larger part of the Gulf of Guinea. The offline advection is
in much better agreement with the PREFCLIM climatology than the online
advection (spatial correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In
PREFCLIM (Fig. 4e), the distributions of horizontal heat advection and
surface heat flux are approximately opposite each other, with advection
acting to cool the mixed layer along most of the 3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N band and along the coast. This sign is expected off the EBUSs of Senegal
and Benguela as<?pagebreak page541?> temperature decreases towards the coast (eastward) and the
zonal circulation is dominated by the westward North Equatorial Current and South
Equatorial Current (NEC and SEC). The seasonal variations of the PREFCLIM and
NEMO offline advection terms show correlations quite different from one
place to another that are moderate on average but rather large slightly south of
the Equator (Fig. 4h). We also compared the annual mean spatial distribution
from the two versions of model advection to the Lagrangian advection and
found that the offline advection is also much better correlated than the
online advection (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with the Lagrangian
advection terms (see Fig. A2 for more details), which suggests that
Lagrangian float density is not sufficient or homogenous enough to capture
nonlinear advection terms.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1754">Mean heat flux from PREFCLIM <bold>(a)</bold>, NEMO resampled at
PREFCLIM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution <bold>(b)</bold> or at original 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
resolution <bold>(c)</bold>, and seasonal correlation between PREFCLIM and NEMO heat flux <bold>(d)</bold>. Mean horizontal heat advection from PREFCLIM <bold>(e)</bold>, NEMO offline <bold>(f)</bold> or
online computation resampled to 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution <bold>(g)</bold>, and seasonal
correlation between PREFCLIM and NEMO offline advection <bold>(h)</bold>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in <bold>(b)</bold>, <bold>(f)</bold>, and <bold>(g)</bold> indicates the spatial correlation between PREFCLIM and NEMO, which
is 95 % significant when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The temporal correlation of
seasonal cycles in <bold>(d)</bold> and <bold>(h)</bold> is 95 % significant when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Regional seasonal budget</title>
      <p id="d1e1874">In this part, we analyze the individual contributions of different physical
processes to the heat budget during a seasonal cycle in selected regions. We
present the seasonal variability of mixed-layer temperature and of the heat
tendency term (Fig. 5) and try to identify the dominant processes. Taylor
diagrams are used to evaluate the consistency of the global terms of the
budget between PREFCLIM climatology and the NEMO model (Fig. 6). In the
following, the observed gridded advection, rather than the observed
Lagrangian advection, is used because it is generally better correlated with
the model advection (see Figs. A3 and A4 for more details).</p>
      <?pagebreak page542?><p id="d1e1877">In the Senegal region, observed and modeled seasonal mixed-layer temperature
variations (Fig. 5a) are largely consistent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). They both show an annual cycle with an SST maximum around 27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in September and a minimum of around 22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in the
middle of the October–May upwelling season (Ndoye
et al., 2014). The minimum is, however, found 1 month later in the model
(March) than in the observations (February). The related tendency terms from
observations and the model (Fig. 5a) agree to a lesser extent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month), which is mainly present in May–June
when the modeled warming is larger than the observed warming. The PREFCLIM
and the modeled regional heat budgets (Fig. 5b) agree on the seasonal
variations of heat flux (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per
month). Differences between observations and the model are larger for horizontal
advection, and again offline advection from NEMO compares slightly better
than online advection with PREFCLIM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
per month vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month, see Fig. A3 for more details). The (pseudo-)residual terms, however, compare better
for online advection than for offline advection (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.87 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month, respectively). Overall, in the Senegal region, the seasonal
cycle of mixed-layer temperature is mainly controlled by surface heat fluxes
that are strong and drive the warming from March to September. For the rest
of the year, they are small or negative and, with the help of horizontal
advection and vertical diffusion, induce cooling (Fig. 5c).</p>
      <?pagebreak page543?><p id="d1e2097">In the equatorial region, Fig. 5d presents the seasonal evolution of
mixed-layer temperature in the model and observations. There is a strong
consistency (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) between the
two terms, with an SST minimum in the same month of August, while the model
reaches the SST maximum in April,  1 month after the observations.
Temperature tendency terms are also consistent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month), although the maximum cooling in May is strongest in
the model. We note also a relatively good consistency in the seasonal cycle
of the heat flux (Fig. 5e, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per
month). There is much less agreement between NEMO and PREFCLIM for the
horizontal advection term, whether it is computed online (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month) or offline (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.69</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month) in the model. The observed residual term
compares much better with the model online pseudo-residual term (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month) than with the offline
pseudo-residual (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month).
Overall, in this equatorial box, according to the model the seasonal cycle
of mixed-layer temperature is essentially driven by vertical heat diffusion
(Fig. 5f) as its variations are rather similar to those of the temperature
tendency term, except for a shift that can be explained by the heat flux,
which remains positive and relatively constant all year long.</p>
      <p id="d1e2301">In the Angola region, the model reproduces the seasonal evolution of
observed mixed-layer temperature well (Fig. 5g, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). The maximum SST observed in March is lagged by 1 month in
the model, but the minimum SST is found in August in both NEMO and the
PREFCLIM climatology. Differences are relatively larger for the heat
tendency term (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month) that is smaller
in the model than observed in November–December (Fig. 5g). We note
strong agreement between modeled and observed heat flux (Fig. 5h, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month). On the contrary, horizontal heat
advection terms are poorly correlated when computed online in the model (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month), but we observe an
improvement when computed offline (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month). This suggests an important role of nonlinear terms in the heat
budget. The resulting observed residual term and model (online and offline)
pseudo-residual term are also quite different (respectively <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month). In the Angola box, the seasonal cycle of the
mixed-layer heat budget is mostly controlled by heat fluxes, especially
solar fluxes, with a contribution from zonal advection and vertical
diffusion (Fig. 5i).</p>
      <p id="d1e2504">In the Benguela region (Fig. 5j), the model reproduces the observed
seasonal cycle of the mixed-layer temperature well, which is maximum in
February–May and minimum from July to October, but with a positive bias
close to 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). The heat
tendency term of the model agrees with observations (Fig. 5j, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month). Heat flux variations are very well
correlated (Fig. 5k, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month).
Horizontal heat advection variations are moderately correlated for offline
computation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month) and even for
online computation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month), and
the observed residual and modeled pseudo-residual are also consistent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.68 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month for online and offline<?pagebreak page544?> version, respectively). In the
Benguela region, the heat budget seasonal cycle is largely controlled by
heat flux warming, balanced by the cumulative cooling effect of zonal heat
advection and vertical diffusion (Fig. 5l).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2717">Seasonal mixed-layer heat budget terms from observations
(dashed line) and the model (full line and full dotted line for pseudo-residual
associated with offline advection) in selected regions: SST (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C)
and tendency terms (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C per month).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2746">Taylor diagram of global terms of the heat budget in selected
regions. Heat flux, horizontal advection (gridded advection for observations
and online advection for model), and (pseudo-)residuals are represented by
squares, circles, and triangles, respectively. Empty circles and triangles are
offline advection and associated (pseudo-)residuals. Senegal, Benguela,
equatorial, and Angola regions are designed by blue, red, yellow, and magenta, respectively. Correlations are 95 % significant when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Mixed-layer salt budget</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>Time-averaged spatial variations</title>
      <p id="d1e2783">We now compare the mean salt budget from the model and from observations through
freshwater flux and horizontal salt advection (Fig. 7). The PREFCLIM
freshwater flux acts to decrease the mixed-layer salinity along the
0–12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N equatorial band, dominated by strong precipitation due to
the ITCZ (Fig. 7a). Elsewhere in the eastern tropical Atlantic, freshwater
flux is dominated by evaporation, which acts to increase mixed-layer
salinity, a feature of the northern and southern subtropical gyres. Evaporation is
maximum off Angola, where southern trade winds can enhance it. The model
freshwater flux forcing reproduces these patterns and, when resampled to
the PREFCLIM resolution (Fig. 7b), shows  good spatial agreement with the
PREFCLIM climatology (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). However, the NEMO freshwater flux shows a
negative bias along the 6–12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N band and in the
Gulf of Guinea and a high positive bias in the rest of the eastern tropical
Atlantic basin. These differences are likely due to the different data
sources used for surface freshwater flux in the PREFCLIM climatology
(TropFlux for evaporation and GPCP for precipitation) and as forcing for the
NEMO model (DFS5.2). However, the seasonal variations of freshwater flux are
generally well correlated between NEMO and PREFCLIM except for a few regions
(Fig. 7d). As expected, there are important differences between the maps of
offline salt advection (Fig. 7f) and online salt advection (Fig. 7g,
resampled at 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). In the online version, advection strongly
acts to decrease mixed-layer salinity almost everywhere in the eastern
tropical Atlantic. However, we note that in the offline version (Fig. 7f)
and in observations (Fig. 7e), advection acts to increase salinity for some
regions: in the 4–10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N equatorial band, west of
12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W between 30 and 18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, off Angola, and in
the northern Gulf of Guinea. The spatial distribution of offline advection
is in much better agreement with the PREFCLIM climatology than online
advection (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Schematically, in the eastern tropical
Atlantic, salinity increases poleward from the Equator due to strong
evaporation in the subtropical gyres, which drives the meridional gradient
(Fig. 3a–b). In addition, salinity decreases toward the east because of
freshwater intakes from rivers in the Gulf of Guinea, resulting in a
westward increase in SSS. In the Gulf of Guinea, the observed salinity
increase by advection can be explained by this SSS gradient transported by
the eastward southern Guinea Current (GC), following Eq. (2). The
freshening by advection in a large part of the eastern tropical Atlantic
basin is expected as the circulation is, on the contrary, dominated by the
westward NEC and SEC. In addition, the presence of alongshore currents like the
southward Angola Current and northward Benguela Current in these coastal
regions can drive either a salting or a freshening due to horizontal salt
advection, as shown with NEMO. Moreover, there can be competition between
zonal and meridional salt advection
(Da-Allada et al., 2013). The
correlation between seasonal cycles of advection in NEMO and PREFCLIM is
very dependent on the location, but it is generally stronger in the Gulf of
Guinea and toward the subtropical gyres (Fig. 7h). We also compared the
annual mean spatial distribution from the two versions of model advection to
the Lagrangian advection and found that the offline advection is also much
better correlated than the online advection (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
with the Lagrangian advection. This suggest the importance of nonlinear
terms. More statistics on comparison of zonal and meridional advection terms can
be found in Fig. A3.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2903">Mean freshwater flux from PREFCLIM <bold>(a)</bold>, NEMO resampled
at PREFCLIM 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution <bold>(b)</bold> or at original 0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
resolution <bold>(c)</bold>, and seasonal correlation between PREFCLIM and NEMO
freshwater flux <bold>(d)</bold>. Mean horizontal salt advection from PREFCLIM <bold>(e)</bold>, NEMO
offline  <bold>(f)</bold> or online computation resampled at 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution <bold>(g)</bold>, and seasonal correlation between PREFCLIM and NEMO offline advection <bold>(h)</bold>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in <bold>(b)</bold>, <bold>(f)</bold>, and <bold>(g)</bold> indicates the spatial correlation between
PREFCLIM and NEMO, which is 95 % significant when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
temporal correlation of seasonal cycles in <bold>(d)</bold> and <bold>(h)</bold> is 95 % significant
when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title>Regional seasonal budget</title>
      <p id="d1e3020">As previously done for the heat budget (see Figs. A5 and A6 for more
details), we evaluate the individual contributions of different physical
processes to the salt budget during a seasonal cycle (Fig. 8) and try to
identify the dominant processes. Taylor diagrams are used to evaluate the
consistency of budget terms between PREFCLIM climatology and the NEMO model
(Fig. 9).</p>
      <p id="d1e3023">In the Senegal region, observed and modeled mixed-layer salinity seasonal
cycles (Fig. 8a) are very different (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.33 psu). SSS
variations are around 0.1 psu during the seasonal cycle in observations, but
reach 0.7 psu in the model, with a maximum in May and a minimum in October
(the latter also seen in observations). The SSS increase from October to May
coincides with the upwelling season (Ndoye et
al., 2014). The seasonal variations of the tendency salinity terms (Fig. 8a)
are also quite different (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12 psu per month). The
observed term remains weaker than the modeled term; they vary in opposite
phase from December to March, then in phase from this month on, but the
modeled freshening is larger than observed in May–November. However, the
seasonal variations of freshwater flux (Fig. 8b) show good agreement between
observations and the model (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.39 psu per month). Modeled
horizontal salt advection and observed horizontal salt advection are less correlated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.34 psu per month for online vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.87 psu per month
for offline), and there are very large differences (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.65 psu per month for online vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.09 psu per month
for offline) between the observed residual term and the model
pseudo-residual term. In this region, the balance is controlled in large
part by freshwater flux because of the compensation between different
oceanic processes. From<?pagebreak page545?> June to October the observed freshening can be
explained by precipitation, which reaches its maximum between July and
August because of the ITCZ position over Sahel, and associated runoff,
particularly from the Senegal and Gambia rivers. From October to November,
the freshening is associated with the combined effect of zonal advection
(Fig. 8c), precipitation, and river runoff, in this order. For the rest of
the year, evaporation plays a dominant role and increases mixed-layer
salinity.</p>
      <p id="d1e3165">In the equatorial region, the modeled and observed seasonal cycles of the
mixed-layer salinity are largely in phase (Fig. 8d, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.79 psu), but the modeled salinity has a seasonal cycle 3 times stronger and
is lower by almost 1.5 psu between April and May. This could be due to the
fact that the observations miss some strong and very shallow near-surface
stratification, which is averaged into the surface grid box of the model.
The minimum SSS observed in February is lagged by 2 months in the model,
but the maximum SSS is found in October in both NEMO and the PREFCLIM
climatology. The related tendency terms (Fig. 8d) are weakly correlated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.27 psu per month). The model term has a stronger
amplitude throughout the cycle with some peaks in January, May, and November.
Figure 8e shows that freshwater fluxes are strongly correlated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.90 psu per month). The horizontal advection terms are quite different
when online computation is used (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.03 psu per month)
but compare better with the offline advection (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.56 psu
per month), although the modeled advection in both cases shows stronger
variations than observed. The model pseudo-residual also compares better
with the observed residual for the offline version than for the online
version (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.81</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.51 psu per month vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.76 psu per month, respectively). In the equatorial region, the seasonal
variability of mixed-layer salinity is mostly due to vertical salt diffusion
and zonal salt advection (Fig. 8f). From September to March, zonal salt
advection increases mixed-layer salinity. Vertical salt diffusion plays a
major role in increasing mixed-layer salinity the rest of the year, in particular
in May when it reaches its maximum. The contributions<?pagebreak page546?> of freshwater flux as well as
vertical and meridional salt advection are weak and can compensate for each
other during the seasonal cycle. Note that, although the seasonal salt
budget described above is representative of the whole equatorial box, SSS
variability within the box increases toward the east (Fig. 3) as the
magnitude of individual processes increases with the salinity stratification
due to coastal river plumes (not shown).</p>
      <p id="d1e3303">In the Angola region, Fig. 8g presents the seasonal evolution of mixed-layer
salinity in the model and observations. The model reproduces (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.28 psu) the seasonal evolution of observed SSS relatively well from the
beginning of the year to August. In June, both the observed SSS and modeled SSS
are around their maximum, but SSS in the model decreases  progressively
until it reaches its minimum in November, when the observed SSS only begins
to decrease until its minimum in February, the month in which the model reaches
its second minimum. The related tendency terms present  disagreement above
all at the end of the cycle (Fig. 8g, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.27 psu per month).
SSS in NEMO reaches its maximum in May and its minimum in February, while
observed SSS reaches its maximum in April and its minimum in December when
the model shows a secondary maximum. Surface freshwater fluxes are both
positive all year long in NEMO and PREFCLIM, indicating that evaporation is
stronger than precipitation, with similar variations (Fig. 8h <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.66 psu per month). In addition to these freshwater fluxes, there
is strong runoff associated with the freshwater discharge from the Congo
River that flows in this box, which is a major driver of SSS here
(Houndegnonto et al., 2021), included
in NEMO only. Horizontal advection in the model and observations is quite
different (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.13 psu per month for online version vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.51 psu per month for offline version), and the modeled
pseudo-residual compares better with the observed residual for the online
version (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.78 psu per month) than for the offline
version (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.43 psu per month). According to the model,
in this region, the salt budget seasonal cycle is mostly driven by oceanic
processes, namely meridional advection, vertical diffusion, and advection, in
this order (Fig. 8i). Note that, although the seasonal salt budget described
above is representative of the whole Angola box, SSS variability within the
box increases toward the north (Fig. 3) as the magnitude of individual
processes increases with the salinity stratification due to coastal river
plumes (not shown).</p>
      <p id="d1e3442">In the Benguela region, the model follows the observed seasonal cycle
of mixed-layer salinity well (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06 psu), though with a
negative mean bias (around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> psu) throughout the cycle (Fig. 8j). The
modeled SSS reaches its maximum in May, 1 month later than observed, and
its minimum in December, also 1 month later than observed. The salt
tendency term of the model also reproduces the observed term relatively well
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.68</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 psu per month), especially<?pagebreak page547?> from January to July
(Fig. 8j). The model shows a maximum SSS increase in February, 1 month
earlier than observed, and maximum SSS decreases in August and December, 2
months later than the observed peaks. NEMO and PREFCLIM freshwater fluxes
are consistent (Fig. 8k, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.88 psu per month).
Horizontal advection terms are less consistent between observations and the
model (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.83 psu per month for online version vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.04 psu per month for offline version), as well as the pseudo-residual
terms (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.92 psu per month for online version vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, RMSD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.10 psu per month for offline version). In the Benguela
region, the salt budget seems to be mostly controlled by freshwater flux and
zonal salt advection. The observed freshening from March to December can be
partly explained by the minimum of evaporation in June, followed by the
increasingly negative effect of zonal advection.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e3594">Seasonal mixed-layer salt budget terms from observations
(dashed line) and the model (full line and full dotted line for pseudo-residual
associated with offline advection) in selected regions: SSS in practical salinity units and
tendency terms in practical salinity units per month.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3605">Taylor diagram of global terms of the salt budget in selected
regions. Freshwater flux, horizontal advection (gridded advection for
observations and online advection for model), and (pseudo-)residuals are
represented by squares, circles, and triangles, respectively. Empty circles and
triangles are offline advection and associated (pseudo-)residuals. Senegal,
Benguela, equatorial, and Angola regions are designed by blue, red, yellow,
and magenta, respectively. Correlations are 95 % significant when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3638">In this paper, we examined the dominant physical processes controlling the
seasonal variability of mixed-layer heat and salt budgets in selected
coastal regions of the eastern tropical Atlantic, namely the Senegal,
equatorial, Angola, and Benguela regions. First, we used both a
regional configuration of the NEMO model and the PREFCLIM observation-based
climatology to analyze the spatial variations of the annual mean mixed-layer
heat and salt budgets in the eastern tropical Atlantic (see Figs. 4 and 7, respectively). The model outputs were resampled to the PREFCLIM
time–space resolution to compare maps of the mean processes contributing to
mixed-layer heat and salt budgets, according to both sources. Second, we
analyzed the seasonal variation of the mixed-layer temperature and salinity,
their related tendencies, and potential driving processes: heat and freshwater
flux, horizontal heat and salt advection, and other processes estimated from
observations as a residual but explicitly resolved in the model for the
selected regions. As the PREFCLIM climatology does not capture the mesoscale
physical processes, we relied on the high-resolution model outputs to
evaluate their contribution to the mixed-layer heat and salt budget.</p>
      <?pagebreak page548?><p id="d1e3641">For the preliminary validation, the results have shown that the model
consistently reproduces the mean features of observed mixed-layer depth,
temperature, and salinity in the eastern tropical Atlantic (see Figs. 1, 2, and 3, respectively). The existing differences between modeled outputs
and the PREFCLIM climatology can be explained by the different heat and salt
flux products that are used for forcing the model or for estimating the
PREFCLIM budget terms. There are also differences in the method to define
the MLD. The PREFCLIM climatology uses the algorithm of
Holte and Talley (2009), whereas the model
uses the density criterion (0.03 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the density at 10 m
depth) recommended by de Boyer
Montégut et al. (2004). For example, the observed strong positive bias
of mixed-layer salinity in the model relative to observations around
12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S is associated with a positive bias in MLD. Except for these
differences, the model and the PREFCLIM climatology capture the shallow
nearshore mixed-layer depth along the Equator and the western coast of
Africa where our selected regions are localized.</p>
      <p id="d1e3665">For the secondary validation, we have used both the model and the PREFCLIM
climatology to analyze the annual mean of heat and freshwater flux as well as
horizontal heat and salt advection. The model heat and freshwater fluxes largely
agree with the PRECLIM climatology (Figs. 4a–b and 7a–b, respectively),
except for differences in a few regions that can again be due to different
flux products or MLD biases. There are important differences between the
model heat and salt advection terms computed either offline (Figs. 4f and 7f,
respectively), at PREFCLIM spatiotemporal resolution (2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
monthly), or online (Figs. 4g and 7g, respectively) at high
spatiotemporal resolution (0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 20 min) with subsequent
monthly resampling at 2.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. These differences are explained by
the high-frequency variability related to mesoscale and sub-mesoscale
dynamics, which is included in the second case but not in the first case. In
particular, including mesoscale dynamics leads to warming around the Equator
and off the African coast in the southern Atlantic. West of 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W
and slightly north of the Equator, this is consistent with warming of the
equatorial cold tongue by horizontal advection linked to TIWs
(Jochum et al., 2004;
Grodsky et al., 2005; Peter et al., 2006). This also suggests a similar role
of eddies in the Angola and Benguela upwelling systems, where<?pagebreak page549?> a large number
of eddies have been detected (Aguedjou et
al., 2019). Regarding salinity, mesoscale advection tends to freshen the
Gulf of Guinea, probably by westward export through eddies of fresh waters
from the Niger and Congo plumes
(Houndegnonto et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e3704">At seasonal timescales, the monthly mixed-layer heat and salt tendency terms in
the selected regions are very weak in both the PREFCLIM climatology and
the model compared to individual terms contributing to the heat and salt
budgets that tend to compensate for each other, as also found in previous
studies
(Da-Allada
et al., 2013, 2014; Camara et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e3708">Surface heat fluxes, especially the solar flux, dominate the seasonal
mixed-layer heat budget in the Senegal, Angola, and  Benguela regions
(Fig. 5b, h, and k, respectively). In the Senegal region, this result, and
the secondary contribution of oceanic processes such as vertical diffusion
and zonal advection, which add to latent heat flux to drive the observed
winter cooling, confirms previous studies
(Carton
and Zhou, 1997; Yu et al., 2006).</p>
      <?pagebreak page550?><p id="d1e3711">In the equatorial region, the heat flux remains positive and nearly constant
throughout the seasonal cycle. This shows the dominance of the shortwave
flux that warms the mixed layer from September to April, although this
warming weakens between November and December. Although our selected box
slightly differs from previous regional studies, this result is in agreement
with earlier studies (Peter
et al., 2006; Wade et al., 2011). The variability of mixed-layer
temperature, in particular the observed spring–summer cooling during the
formation of the ACT, is mainly controlled by vertical heat diffusion (Fig. 5e), confirming other studies
(Yu
et al., 2006; Jouanno et al., 2011). Recently,
Scannell and McPhaden (2018) also confirmed the
role of turbulent vertical mixing from a PIRATA buoy located at the
southeastern edge of the ACT. While it does not compensate for the cooling
effect of vertical diffusion, zonal heat advection is positive all year long
in the equatorial region, the only one among analyzed regions where it is
so. This is the consequence of a negative zonal temperature gradient as the
mixed-layer temperature decreases toward the coast, advected by westward
currents associated with the SEC. When associated with meridional heat
advection, this leads to a positive horizontal heat advection throughout all
year except in the month of May. We note a nearly similar variability of
horizontal advection in Wade et al. (2011),
although this term is negative in their study except for June–July, when we
both observe a positive maximum. This difference can be linked to either
products used or the criterion used to define the MLD (temperature vs.
density criterion) and maybe to the slightly different boxes of study.
Jouanno et al. (2017) also found, like us, a
permanent warming effect of horizontal advection in an equatorial box
shifted west compared to ours using the same model configuration. In our
box, according to the model this warming is largely due to mesoscale
advection, probably by eddies as TIW activity sharply decreases east of
15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W
(Foltz et
al., 2003; Peter et al., 2006; Tuchen et al., 2022). There is overall
agreement on the dominant role of vertical mixing to cool the mixed layer
during ACT formation. This vertical mixing due to vertical diffusion is
explained by the strong vertical shear between the Equatorial Undercurrent
(EUC) and the SEC in our selected region, as discussed in previous studies
(Wade
et al., 2011; Jouanno et al., 2011; Hummels et al., 2013; Schlundt et al.,
2014). The vertical mixing can also be enhanced by the effects of TIWs on
vertical shear (Heukamp et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d1e3723">In the Angola region, the dominant role of heat flux in the mixed-layer heat
budget was also found in previous studies
(Carton
and Zhou, 1997; Yu et al., 2006). In this region, the incoming shortwave
flux warms the mixed layer from August until March against the action of
latent heat flux. The competition between the shortwave flux and the latent
heat flux is also mentioned in Scannell and
McPhaden (2018), although at the 6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E position, the
horizontal advection remains weak in their study. The cooling observed
between April and July is due to the decrease in solar radiation, probably
due to cloud cover, with the added effect of zonal heat advection. We observe
the warmest temperature in March, and the minimum is reached in August, which
corresponds to the upwelling season
(Ostrowski et al.,
2009; Kopte et al., 2017). Although the contribution of zonal heat advection
remains weak compared to the solar flux, the variations of zonal heat
advection are in phase with the variation of heat tendency throughout the
year.</p>
      <p id="d1e3744">In the Benguela region, the heat tendency variations are roughly in phase
with the heat flux variations. The heat budget is mostly driven by the
shortwave flux, as found previously in the neighboring southern Angola
upwelling system. The cooling that occurs from March to August can be
associated with cloud cover, which reduces the incoming solar flux, and also
a small contribution of oceanic processes. The observed coldest temperatures
correspond to the July–October upwelling season
(Hagen
et al., 2001; Muller et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e3747">There are much larger differences between PREFCLIM and NEMO in the seasonal
variations of the mixed-layer salinity (Fig. 8a, d, g, j) compared to
temperature. These seasonal variations generally have a larger amplitude and
lower minima in the model, as also seen in Fig. 3. This can be due to
several factors. First, although the PREFCLIM product benefited from newly
available hydrographic data in the Senegal, Angola, and Namibia coastal
waters, the data density is still low in the equatorial Gulf of Guinea
(Dengler and Rath, 2015), the freshest waters associated with heavy rain as well as the large Congo and Niger River plumes; hence, the
largest difference in seasonal salinity variations is in the equatorial box
(Fig. 8d). Poor data density can also be associated with a seasonal bias
that may prevent capturing the full seasonal cycle. Second, hydrographic
profiles, notably those from Argo floats, do not sample the salinity minimum
found in the upper few meters of the ocean in regions highly stratified by
rain and river plumes, which induces SSS estimations higher than those
observed from satellites
(Boutin
et al., 2016; Houndegnonto et al., 2021). This leads to overestimation of
mixed-layer salinity too. Third, while the NEMO model configuration has high
vertical resolution in the upper few meters and homogeneous spatial
coverage, the way it reproduces mixed-layer salinity highly depends on its
freshwater forcing, including river runoff, and its own dynamics that are of
course not perfect. Despite these differences between observations and the
model, the comparison is instructive.</p>
      <p id="d1e3750">The Senegal region is the only one among the four analyzed regions where the
salt budget is clearly controlled by the surface freshwater fluxes, with an
added runoff effect (Fig. 8b). From March to October the observed freshening
can be explained by the combined effect of precipitation and Senegal and
Gambia rivers inputs. From October to November, zonal salt advection adds
its contribution to existing freshwater inputs to freshen the mixed layer.
Vertical salt diffusion, with an additional contribution of meridional and
vertical salt advection, tends to increase mixed-layer salinity and partly
compensates for the previous freshening effect. Although our selected regions
are slightly different, these results are  consistent with those
of Camara et al. (2015). However, in our
study, evaporation plays a dominant role in increasing salinity for the rest
of the year, even if there is also a weak contribution of oceanic processes.
This disagrees with the study of Camara
et al. (2015), wherein the contribution of evaporation to the mixed-layer salt
budget is very weak compared to our results. This contradiction can be
explained by different model configurations as described in
Da-Allada et al. (2017).
Camara et al. (2015) use for model
forcing an older version of the DRAKKAR Forcing Set (DFS4) compared to the
one (DFS5.2) used in the present study, and their model has fewer vertical
levels than ours (46 vs. 75). They also use a smaller density criterion (0.01 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Camara et al., 2015, vs.
0.03 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in this study to estimate mixed layer depth) and an
additional restoring term for salinity in their model.</p>
      <p id="d1e3778">In the equatorial region, the seasonal variability of mixed-layer salinity
is mainly due to oceanic processes as shown in other studies
(Da-Allada et al., 2013,
2014). In our study, we found vertical salt diffusion and zonal salt
advection as dominant oceanic processes (Fig. 8f). From October to December
and March to July, zonal advection is the most important freshening
contribution, stronger that precipitation. It is explained by the westward
South Equatorial Current (SEC), which transports low-salinity waters
from the Gulf of Guinea associated with the Niger and Congo River plumes
(Houndegnonto et al., 2021). The
major role played by vertical salt diffusion in increasing the salinity in the
mixed layer, demonstrated in previous studies
(Da-Allada et al., 2014,
2017), is confirmed by our results for boreal spring–summer in particular.
This strong vertical salt diffusion is the consequence of the vertical shear
between the westward SEC and the eastward EUC (which transports high-salinity waters) but can be reduced by the strong salinity<?pagebreak page551?> stratification
caused by the Niger and Congo River plumes (Jouanno
et al., 2011). Note that vertical diffusion,  however, is strongly compensated for
by zonal advection, above all in May. These results agree with the other
studies covering the region despite slight differences in the limits of
selected boxes
(Berger
et al., 2014; Da-Allada et al., 2014, 2017; Camara et al., 2015). Although the contribution of surface freshwater fluxes and runoff
remains weak in our study, its seasonal variations follow those described by
Da-Allada et al. (2017), with some
time lag. During the period when the ITCZ is close to the Equator between
November and April, the freshwater flux is dominated by precipitation and
decreases the mixed-layer salinity, whereas the rest of the year, the freshwater
flux is dominated by evaporation and increases salinity.</p>
      <p id="d1e3781">As in the equatorial region, horizontal and vertical oceanic processes drive
the mixed-layer salinity in the Angola region too (Fig. 8g–i), in agreement
with previous studies
(Camara et al.,
2015; Awo et al., 2022). Meridional salt advection explains most of the
variability in salt budget, particularly its semi-annual cycle, as it
freshens the mixed layer in February–April and September–October, when the
southward Angola Current brings low-salinity water from the Congo River
plume (Gordon and Bosley,
1991; Awo et al., 2022). However, for the rest of the seasonal cycle, a
combined action of meridional salt advection, vertical salt advection, and
vertical salt diffusion increases the salinity of the mixed layer. Although
vertical advection is stronger than vertical diffusion, they remain in phase
throughout the cycle and act against the runoff and zonal salt advection.
Seasonal variations in both vertical salt diffusion and advection are driven
by changes in the vertical salinity gradient related to the semi-annual
intrusion of low-salinity surface waters
(Camara et al.,
2015; Awo et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d1e3784">In the Benguela region, individual contributions of physical processes are
relatively weak in comparison to the other regions. The mixed-layer salinity
variability is partly controlled by freshwater fluxes, particularly
evaporation (Fig. 8j–k). Zonal advection remains negative throughout the
year, and from March to December, it acts to decrease salinity, against the
action of evaporation that is reinforced by vertical salt diffusion between
September and December. The increase in salinity corresponds to the
upwelling season in the southern part of Benguela upwelling system in summer
(Muller et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e3787">Although increasing resolution in oceanic models intends to produce more
realistic simulations by explicitly resolving mesoscale variability, and
models are the only way to estimate all terms of the heat and salt budget in the
mixed layer, it is difficult to directly validate such model budgets with in
situ data. One problem is that globally available in situ data can only
explicitly resolve near-surface horizontal processes, particularly
advection, not vertical processes that have to be estimated as a residual. A
second problem is that in situ observation density does not allow estimating
horizontal advection at the high resolution available from models.
Therefore, to be properly compared with those available from observations,
model horizontal advection terms must be computed offline at the
spatiotemporal resolution of observations. Our results indeed show that the
time-averaged spatial distribution of NEMO offline heat and salt advection terms
compares much better to PREFCLIM horizontal advection terms than the online
heat and salt advection terms. However, when examining the seasonal cycle of
horizontal advection in selected boxes, NEMO offline terms do not always
compare well with PREFCLIM, sometimes less than online terms. This suggests
that temporal coverage of in situ observations is more critical than spatial
coverage, particularly for salinity, and especially in coastal areas of
Africa where Argo profiles are relatively scarce and in the equatorial region where
Lagrangian drifters do not stay long due to Ekman divergence. Another
possibility would be to estimate advection from satellite products of SST,
SSS, and currents, the latter estimated from altimetry and satellite wind for
their geostrophic and Ekman components, respectively
(Bonjean and Lagerloef, 2002), which
are available at a resolution of a few tens of kilometers and a few days.
The new Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission
(Morrow et al., 2019) should soon
further improve the resolution of geostrophic currents. The Soil Moisture
Ocean Salinity High Resolution (SMOS-HR) mission project
(Rodriguez-Fernandez et al., 2022) would also help to capture
SSS gradients. The often large differences between offline and online
advection terms in the model suggest an important role of small-scale
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> month) variability, which includes
mesoscale activity recently documented in the eastern tropical Atlantic
(Aguedjou et al., 2019), including at the
Equator where differences are particularly large. Although the model
mixed-layer budget validation has some limitations in the present study,
our results are generally in agreement with earlier studies of mixed-layer
heat and salt budgets in the tropical Atlantic
(Foltz
et al., 2003; Jouanno et al., 2011; Wade et al., 2011; Da-Allada et al.,
2013; Camara et al., 2015). Except for local studies wherein coordinated field
measurements and mooring deployment can be combined to close a short-term
mixed-layer budget with in situ observations
(Farrar
et al., 2015; Farrar and Plueddemann, 2019; Vijith et al., 2020), in most
regions, one can only use models to close mixed-layer budgets and trust
them to quantify the processes hidden in the residual unresolved by global
observations.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<?pagebreak page552?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title/>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d1e3827">Difference between observations and the model in
mixed-layer depth <bold>(a)</bold>, mixed-layer temperature <bold>(b)</bold>, and mixed-layer salinity <bold>(c)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F11"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A2</label><caption><p id="d1e3849">Spatial correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and RMSD of horizontal, zonal, and
meridional heat <bold>(a, b)</bold> and salt <bold>(c, d)</bold> advection between observations (Obs
and Obs-drift) and the model (online and offline).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023-f11.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F12"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A3</label><caption><p id="d1e3877">Taylor diagrams comparing seasonal variations of
horizontal, zonal, and meridional heat advection (HADV, UADV, VADV) from
observations (gridded advection named Obs <bold>a</bold>; Lagrangian advection named
Obs-drift <bold>b</bold>) and the model (online advection for ON and offline advection for
OFF) in the Senegal, equatorial, Angola, and Benguela boxes (blue, red, yellow,
and magenta, respectively).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023-f12.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F13"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A4</label><caption><p id="d1e3896">Seasonal cycle of horizontal (cyan), zonal (blue), and
meridional (purple) heat advection from observations (dashed line for
gridded advection and dotted line for Lagrangian advection) and the model (full
line for online and full dotted line for offline) in selected boxes. All
others terms are in degrees Celsius per month.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023-f13.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F14"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A5</label><caption><p id="d1e3910">Taylor diagram of horizontal salt advection and these
components between observations (gridded advection for Obs <bold>a</bold> and
Lagrangian advection for Obs-drift <bold>b</bold>) and the model (online for ON and offline
for OFF). Senegal, equatorial, Angola, and Benguela boxes are designated by
blue, red, green, and magenta, respectively.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023-f14.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F15"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A6</label><caption><p id="d1e3929">Seasonal cycle of horizontal (cyan), zonal (blue), and
meridional (purple) salt advection from observations (dashed line for
gridded advection and dotted line for Lagrangian advection) and the model (full
line for online and full dotted line for offline) in selected boxes. All
others terms are in practical salinity units (psu) per month.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/19/535/2023/os-19-535-2023-f15.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3946">The PREFCLIM climatology used here is available from <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.868927" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.868927</ext-link> (Rath et al., 2016). Model simulations are
available from the authors on demand.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3955">RDN performed the data analysis and wrote the paper with a strong
contribution from GA. OEK did some preliminary analysis under the supervision of
GA, CYDA, and JJ. WR and JJ produced the PREFCLIM climatology and the NEMO
model simulation, respectively. All co-authors contributed to the scientific
improvement of the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3961">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e3967">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3973">This work is part of the PhD thesis of Roy Dorgeless Ngakala, funded by the DAAD (Deutscher
Akademischer Austauschdientst/German Academic Exchange Service) in the
framework of the “In-Country/In-Region Scholarship Programme” for Sub-Saharan
Africa. The PREFCLIM climatology was produced in the framework of the European
Union FP7 PREFACE project. This study was supported by the TRIATLAS project,
which has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research
and innovation program under grant agreement 817578. This study is also
supported by the TOSCA SMOS and SWOT-GG projects funded by CNES.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3978">This research has been supported by the H2020 TRIATLAS project (grant no. 817578).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3984">This paper was edited by Karen J. Heywood and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Aguedjou, H. M. A., Dadou, I., Chaigneau, A., Morel, Y., and Alory, G.:
Eddies in the Tropical Atlantic Ocean and Their Seasonal Variability,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 12156–12164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083925" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL083925</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alory, G., Da-Allada, C. Y., Djakouré, S., Dadou, I., Jouanno, J., and
Loemba, D. P.: Coastal Upwelling Limitation by Onshore Geostrophic Flow in
the Gulf of Guinea Around the Niger River Plume, Front. Mar. Sci., 7,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.607216" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2020.607216</ext-link>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Awo, F. M., Alory, G., Da-Allada, C. Y., Delcroix, T., Jouanno, J.,
Kestenare, E., and Baloïtcha, E.: Sea Surface Salinity Signature of the
Tropical Atlantic Interannual Climatic Modes, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123,
7420–7437, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC013837" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JC013837</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Awo, F. M., Rouault, M., Ostrowski, M., Tomety, F. S., Da-Allada, C. Y., and
Jouanno, J.: Seasonal Cycle of Sea Surface Salinity in the Angola Upwelling
System, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 127, 1–13,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018518" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JC018518</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Berger, H., Treguier, A. M., Perenne, N., and Talandier, C.: Dynamical
contribution to sea surface salinity variations in the eastern Gulf of
Guinea based on numerical modelling, Clim. Dynam., 43, 3105–3122,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2195-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-014-2195-4</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bingham, F. M., Foltz, G. R., and McPhaden, M. J.: Characteristics of the seasonal cycle of surface layer salinity in the global ocean, Ocean Sci., 8, 915–929, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-915-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-8-915-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bonjean, F. and Lagerloef, G. S. E.: Diagnostic model and analysis of the
surface currents in the Tropical Pacific Ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32,
2938–2954, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;2938:DMAAOT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;2938:DMAAOT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bourlès, B., Araujo, M., McPhaden, M. J., Brandt, P., Foltz, G. R.,
Lumpkin, R., Giordani, H., Hernandez, F., Lefèvre, N., Nobre, P.,
Campos, E., Saravanan, R., Trotte-Duhà, J., Dengler, M., Hahn, J.,
Hummels, R., Lübbecke, J. F., Rouault, M., Cotrim, L., Sutton, A.,
Jochum, M., and Perez, R. C.: PIRATA: A Sustained Observing System for
Tropical Atlantic Climate Research and Forecasting, Earth Sp. Sci., 6,
577–616, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EA000428" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018EA000428</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boutin, J., Chao, Y., Asher, W. E., Delcroix, T., Drucker, R., Drushka, K.,
Kolodziejczyk, N., Lee, T., Reul, N., Reverdin, G., Schanze, J., Soloviev,
A., Yu, L., Anderson, J., Brucker, L., Dinnat, E., Santos-Garcia, A., Jones,
W. L., Maes, C., Meissner, T., Tang, W., Vinogradova, N., and Ward, B.:
Satellite and in situ salinity understanding near-surface stratification and
subfootprint variability, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 1391–1407,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00032.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00032.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Camara, I., Kolodziejczyk, N., Mignot, J., Lazar, A., and Gaye, A. T.: On
the seasonal variations of salinity of the tropical Atlantic mixed layer, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120, 4441–4462,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC010865" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JC010865</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Caniaux, G., Giordani, H., Redelsperger, J. L., Guichard, F., Key, E., and
Wade, M.: Coupling between the Atlantic cold tongue and the West African
monsoon in boreal spring and summer, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 116, 1–17,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006570" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JC006570</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carton, J. A. and Zhou, Z.: Annual cycle of sea surface temperature in the
tropical Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 102, 27813–27824,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC02197" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JC02197</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chang, P., Yamagata, T., Schopf, P., Behera, S. K., Carton, J., Kessler, W.
S., Meyers, G., Qu, T., Schott, F., Shetye, S., and Xie, S. P.: Climate
fluctuations of tropical coupled systems – The role of ocean dynamics, J.
Climate, 19, 5122–5174, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3903.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI3903.1</ext-link>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chavez, F. P. and Messié, M.: A comparison of Eastern Boundary Upwelling
Ecosystems, Prog. Oceanogr., 83, 80–96,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.032" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.032</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chelton, D. B., Deszoeke, R. A., Schlax, M. G., El Naggar, K., and Siwertz,
N.: Geographical variability of the first baroclinic Rossby radius of
deformation, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 433–460,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0433:GVOTFB&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0433:GVOTFB&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Da-Allada, C. Y., Alory, G., Du Penhoat, Y., Kestenare, E., Durand, F., and
Hounkonnou, N. M.: Seasonal mixed-layer salinity balance in the tropical
Atlantic Ocean: Mean state and seasonal cycle, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118,
332–345, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008357" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JC008357</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Da-Allada, C. Y., du Penhoat, Y., Jouanno, J., Alory, G., and Hounkonnou, N.
M.: Modeled mixed-layer salinity balance in the Gulf of Guinea: seasonal and
interannual variability, Ocean Dynam., 64, 1783–1802,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-014-0775-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10236-014-0775-9</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Da-Allada, C. Y., Jouanno, J., Gaillard, F., Kolodziejczyk, N., Maes, C.,
Reul, N., and Bourlès, B.: Importance of the Equatorial Undercurrent on
the sea surface salinity in the eastern equatorial Atlantic in boreal
spring, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 521–538,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012342" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JC012342</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dai, A. and Trenberth, K. E.: Estimates of Freshwater Discharge from
Continents: Latitudinal and Seasonal Variations, J. Hydrometeorol., 3,
660–687, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003&lt;0660:EOFDFC&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003&lt;0660:EOFDFC&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>de Boyer Montégut, C., Madec, G., Fischer, A. S., Lazar, A., and
Iudicone, D.: Mixed layer depth over the global ocean: An examination of
profile data and a profile-based climatology, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 109,
1–20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002378" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JC002378</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Delcroix, T. and Henin, C.: Seasonal and interannual variations of sea
surface salinity in the tropical Pacific Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 96,
22135–22150, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JC02124" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91JC02124</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dengler, M. and Rath, W.: Seasonal heat and fresh water mixed-layer balance
climatology, 1–15, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Djakouré, S., Penven, P., Bourlès, B., Veitch, J., and Koné, V.:
Coastally trapped eddies in the north of the Gulf of Guinea, J. Geophys.
Res.-Oceans, 119, 6805–6819,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010243" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JC010243</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Djakouré, S., Penven, P., Bourlès, B., Koné, V., and Veitch, J.:
Respective roles of the Guinea current and local winds on the coastal
upwelling in the northern Gulf of Guinea, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 47,
1367–1387, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-16-0126.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-16-0126.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Durack, P. J. and Wijffels, S. E.: Fifty-Year trends in global ocean
salinities and their relationship to broad-scale warming, J. Climate, 23,
4342–4362, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3377.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2010JCLI3377.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dussin, R., Barnier, B., Brodeau, L., and Molines, J. M.: The making of the
DRAKKAR Forcing Set DFS5, Drakkar, MyOcean Report, Grenoble, 2016 pp., <uri>http://www.drakkar-ocean.eu/publications/reports/report_DFS5v3_April2016.pdf</uri> (last access: 27 April 2023), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Farrar, J. T. and Plueddemann, A. J.: On the Factors Driving Upper-Ocean
Salinity Variability at the Western Edge of the Eastern Pacific Fresh Pool.,
Oceanography (Wash. D. C)., 32, 30–39,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2019.209" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5670/oceanog.2019.209</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Farrar, J. T., Rainville, L., Plueddemann, A. J., Kessler, W. S., Lee, C.,
Hodges, B. A., Schmitt, R. W., Edson, J. B., Riser, S. C., and Eriksen, C.
C.: Salinity and temperature balances at the SPURS central mooring during
fall and winter, Oceanography, 28, 56–65, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Foltz, G. R. and McPhaden, M. J.: Seasonal mixed layer salinity balance of
the tropical North Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 113, 1–14,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004178" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JC004178</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Foltz, G. R., Grodsky, S. A., Carton, J. A., and McPhaden, M. J.: Seasonal mixed layer heat budget of the tropical Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 108, 148–227, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001584" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JC001584</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Foltz, G. R., Grodsky, S. A., Carton, J. A., and McPhaden, M. J.: Seasonal
salt budget of the northwestern tropical Atlantic Ocean along 38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 109, 1–13,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jc002111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jc002111</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Foltz, G. R., Schmid, C., and Lumpkin, R.: Seasonal cycle of the mixed layer
heat budget in the northeastern tropical atlantic ocean, J. Climate, 26,
8169–8188, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00037.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00037.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gordon, A. L. and Bosley, K. T.: Cyclonic gyre in the tropical South
Atlantic, Deep Sea Res., 38, 323–343,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0198-0149(12)80015-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0198-0149(12)80015-x</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Grodsky, S. A., Carton, J. A., Provost, C., Servain, J., Lorenzzetti, J. A.,
and Mcphaden, M. J.: Tropical instability waves at 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N , 23<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W in the Atlantic: A case study using Pilot Research Moored
Array in the Tropical Atlantic (PIRATA) mooring data, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 110, 1–12,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC002941" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JC002941</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hagen, E., Feistel, R., Agenbag, J. J., and Ohde, T.: Seasonal and
interannual changes in intense Benguela upwelling (1982–1999), Oceanol.
Acta, 24, 557–568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0399-1784(01)01173-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0399-1784(01)01173-2</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hasson, A. E. A., Delcroix, T., and Dussin, R.: An assessment of the mixed
layer salinity budget in the tropical Pacific Ocean. Observations and
modelling (1990–2009), Ocean Dynam., 63, 179–194,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-013-0596-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10236-013-0596-2</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hernandez, O., Jouanno, J., and Durand, F.: Do the Amazon and Orinoco
freshwater plumes really matter for hurricane-induced ocean surface
cooling?, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121, 2119–2141,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JC011021</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heukamp, F. O., Brandt, P., Dengler, M., Tuchen, F. P., McPhaden, M. J., and
Moum, J. N.: Tropical Instability Waves and Wind-Forced Cross-Equatorial
Flow in the Central Atlantic Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL099325, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099325" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022GL099325</ext-link>,
2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Holte, J. and Talley, L.: A new algorithm for finding mixed layer depths
with applications to argo data and subantarctic mode water formation, J.
Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 26, 1920–1939,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHO543.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JTECHO543.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Houndegnonto, O. J., Kolodziejczyk, N., Maes, C., Bourlès, B.,
Da-Allada, C. Y., and Reul, N.: Seasonal Variability of Freshwater Plumes in
the Eastern Gulf of Guinea as Inferred From Satellite Measurements, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 126, 1–57, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC017041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JC017041</ext-link>,
2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page557?><ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huffman, G. J., Adler, R. F., Bolvin, D. T., and Gu, G.: Improving the
global precipitation record: GPCP Version 2.1, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36,
1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040000" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL040000</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hummels, R., Dengler, M., and Bourlès, B.: Seasonal and regional
variability of upper ocean diapycnal heat flux in the Atlantic cold tongue,
Prog. Oceanogr., 111, 52–74, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2012.11.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2012.11.001</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hummels, R., Dengler, M., Brandt, P., and Schlundt, M.: Diapycnal heat flux
and mixed layer heat budget within the Atlantic Cold Tongue, Clim. Dynam., 43,
3179–3199, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2339-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-014-2339-6</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jochum, M., Malanotte-Rizzoli, P., and Busalacchi, A.: Tropical instability
waves in the Atlantic Ocean, Ocean Model., 7, 145–163,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-5003(03)00042-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1463-5003(03)00042-8</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jochum, M., Murtugudde, R., Ferrari, R., and Malanotte-Rizzoli, P.: The
Impact of Horizontal Resolution on the Tropical Heat Budget in an Atlantic
Ocean Model, J. Climate, 18, 841–851, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3288.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-3288.1</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jouanno, J., Marin, F., Du Penhoat, Y., Sheinbaum, J., and Molines, J. M.:
Seasonal heat balance in the upper 100 m of the equatorial Atlantic Ocean,
J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 116, 1–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006912" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JC006912</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jouanno, J., Hernandez, O., and Sanchez-Gomez, E.: Equatorial Atlantic interannual variability and its relation to dynamic and thermodynamic processes, Earth Syst. Dynam., 8, 1061–1069, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-1061-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esd-8-1061-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Junker, T., Schmidt, M., and Mohrholz, V.: The relation of wind stress curl
and meridional transport in the Benguela upwelling system, J. Mar. Syst.,
143, 1–6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.10.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.10.006</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Junker, T., Mohrholz, V., Siegfried, L., and van der Plas, A.: Seasonal to
interannual variability of water mass characteristics and currents on the
Namibian shelf, J. Mar. Syst., 165, 36–46,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.09.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.09.003</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kopte, R., Brandt, P., Dengler, M., Tchipalanga, P. C. M., Macuéria, M.,
and Ostrowski, M.: The Angola Current: Flow and hydrographic characteristics
as observed at 11<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 1177–1189,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012374" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JC012374</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kumar, B. P., Vialard, J., Lengaigne, M., Murty, V. S. N., and McPhaden, M.
J.: TropFlux: air-sea fluxes for the global tropical oceans – description
and evaluation, Clim. Dynam., 38, 1521–1543,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1115-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-011-1115-0</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kushnir, Y., Robinson, W. A., Chang, P., and Robertson, A. W.: The physical
basis for predicting Atlantic sector seasonal-to-interannual climate
variability, J. Climate, 19, 5949–5970, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3943.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI3943.1</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Large, W. G. and Yeager, S. G.: The global climatology of an interannually
varying air – Sea flux data set, Clim. Dynam., 33, 341–364,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0441-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00382-008-0441-3</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lebedev, K. V, Yoshinari, H., Maximenko, N. A., and Hacker, P. W.: Velocity
data derived from trajectories of Argo floats, IPRC Tech. Note, 2, 20 pp., 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, T., Lagerloef, G., Kao, H., McPhaden, M. J., Willis, J., and Gierach,
M. M.: The influence of salinity on tropical Atlantic instability waves, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119, 8375–8394, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JC010100</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lumpkin, R., Grodsky, S. A., Centurioni, L., Rio, M. H., Carton, J. A., and
Lee, D.: Removing spurious low-frequency variability in drifter velocities,
J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 30, 353–360,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00139.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00139.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Morrow, R., Fu, L. L., Ardhuin, F., Benkiran, M., Chapron, B., Cosme, E.,
D'Ovidio, F., Farrar, J. T., Gille, S. T., Lapeyre, G., Le Traon, P. Y.,
Pascual, A., Ponte, A., Qiu, B., Rascle, N., Ubelmann, C., Wang, J., and
Zaron, E.: Global observations of fine-scale ocean surface topography with
the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) Mission, Front. Mar. Sci., 6,
1–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00232" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2019.00232</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Muller, A. A., Reason, C. J. C., Schmidt, M., Mohrholz, V., and Eggert, A.:
Computing transport budgets along the shelf and across the shelf edge in the
northern Benguela during summer (DJF) and winter (JJA), J. Mar. Syst., 140,
82–91, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.02.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.02.007</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ndoye, S., Capet, X., Estrade, P., Sow, B., Dagorne, D., Lazar, A., Gaye,
A., and Brehmer, P.: SST patterns and dynamics of the southern
Senegal-Gambia upwelling center, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119, 8315–8335,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010242" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JC010242</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ostrowski, M., Da Silva, J. C. B., and Bazik-Sangolay, B.: The response of
sound scatterers to El Ninõ- and La Niña-like oceanographic regimes
in the southeastern Atlantic, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 66, 1063–1072,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsp102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/icesjms/fsp102</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peter, A. C., Le Hénaff, M., du Penhoat, Y., Menkes, C. E., Marin, F.,
Vialard, J., Caniaux, G., and Lazar, A.: A model study of the seasonal mixed
layer heat budget in the equatorial Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 111,
1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003157" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JC003157</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Philander, S. G. H. and Pacanowski, R. C.: The oceanic response to
cross-equatorial winds (with application to coastal upwelling in low
latitudes), Tellus, 33, 201–210,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v33i2.10708" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusa.v33i2.10708</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Picaut, J.: Propagation of the Seasonal Upwelling in the Eastern Equatorial
Atlantic, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1983)013&lt;0018:potsui&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1983)013&lt;0018:potsui&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rath, W., Dengler, M., Lüdke, J., Schmidtko, S., Schlundt, M., Brandt,
P., Bumke, K., Ostrowski, M., van der Plas, A., Junker, T., Mohrholz, V.,
Sarre, A., Tchipalanga, P. C. M., and Coelho, P.: PREFCLIM: A
high-resolution mixed-layer climatology of the eastern tropical Atlantic, PANGAEA [data set],
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.868927" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/PANGAEA.868927</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reason, C. J. C. and Rouault, M.: Sea surface temperature variability in the
tropical southeast Atlantic Ocean and West African rainfall, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 33, 1–5, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027145" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL027145</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rodriguez-Fernandez, N. J., Anterrieu, E., Boutin, J., Supply, A., Reverdin,
G., Alory, G., Remy, E., Picard, G., Pellarin, T., and Richaume, P.: The
SMOS-HR Mission: Science Case and Project Status, in: IGARSS 2022–2022, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 7182–7185, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Scannell, H. A. and McPhaden, M. J.: Seasonal Mixed Layer Temperature
Balance in the Southeastern Tropical Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123,
5557–5570, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014099" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JC014099</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schlundt, M., Brandt, P., Dengler, M., Hummels, R., Fischer, T., Bumke, K.,
Krahmann, G., and Karstensen, J.: Mixed layer heat and salinity budgets
during the onset of the 2011 Atlantic cold tongue, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans,
119, 7882–7910, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JC010021</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page558?><ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schmidtko, S., Johnson, G. C., and Lyman, J. M.: MIMOC: A global monthly
isopycnal upper-ocean climatology with mixed layers, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118, 1658–1672, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrc.20122</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stevenson, J. W. and Niiler, P. P.: Upper Ocean Heat Budget During the
Hawaii-to-Tahiti Shuttle Experiment, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 13, 1894–1907,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1983)013&lt;1894:UOHBDT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1983)013&lt;1894:UOHBDT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Taylor, K. E.: Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single
diagram, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 7183–7192,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900719</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tuchen, F. P., Perez, R. C., Foltz, G. R., Brandt, P., and Lumpkin, R.:
Multidecadal Intensification of Atlantic Tropical Instability Waves,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gl101073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022gl101073</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tzortzi, E., Josey, S. A., Srokosz, M., and Gommenginger, C.: Tropical
atlantic salinity variability: New insights from SMOS, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
40, 2143–2147, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50225" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50225</ext-link>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vijith, V., Vinayachandran, P. N., Webber, B. G. M., Matthews, A. J.,
George, J. V., Kannaujia, V. K., Lotliker, A. A., and Amol, P.: Closing the
sea surface mixed layer temperature budget from in situ observations alone:
Operation Advection during BoBBLE, Sci. Rep., 10, 1–12,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63320-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-020-63320-0</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wade, M., Caniaux, G., and Du Penhoat, Y.: Variability of the mixed layer
heat budget in the eastern equatorial Atlantic during 2005–2007 as inferred
using Argo floats, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 116, 1–17,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006683" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JC006683</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Waliser, D. E. and Gautier, C.: A satellite-derived climatology of the ITCZ,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006&lt;2162:ASDCOT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006&lt;2162:ASDCOT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yu, L., Jin, X., and Weller, R. A.: Role of net surface heat flux in
seasonal variations of sea surface temperature in the tropical Atlantic
Ocean, J. Climate, 19, 6153–6169, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3970.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI3970.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Joint observation–model mixed-layer heat and salt budgets in the eastern tropical Atlantic</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Aguedjou, H. M. A., Dadou, I., Chaigneau, A., Morel, Y., and Alory, G.:
Eddies in the Tropical Atlantic Ocean and Their Seasonal Variability,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 12156–12164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083925" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083925</a>,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Alory, G., Da-Allada, C. Y., Djakouré, S., Dadou, I., Jouanno, J., and
Loemba, D. P.: Coastal Upwelling Limitation by Onshore Geostrophic Flow in
the Gulf of Guinea Around the Niger River Plume, Front. Mar. Sci., 7,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.607216" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.607216</a>, 2021.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Awo, F. M., Alory, G., Da-Allada, C. Y., Delcroix, T., Jouanno, J.,
Kestenare, E., and Baloïtcha, E.: Sea Surface Salinity Signature of the
Tropical Atlantic Interannual Climatic Modes, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123,
7420–7437, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC013837" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC013837</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Awo, F. M., Rouault, M., Ostrowski, M., Tomety, F. S., Da-Allada, C. Y., and
Jouanno, J.: Seasonal Cycle of Sea Surface Salinity in the Angola Upwelling
System, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 127, 1–13,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018518" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JC018518</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Berger, H., Treguier, A. M., Perenne, N., and Talandier, C.: Dynamical
contribution to sea surface salinity variations in the eastern Gulf of
Guinea based on numerical modelling, Clim. Dynam., 43, 3105–3122,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2195-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2195-4</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bingham, F. M., Foltz, G. R., and McPhaden, M. J.: Characteristics of the seasonal cycle of surface layer salinity in the global ocean, Ocean Sci., 8, 915–929, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-915-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-8-915-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bonjean, F. and Lagerloef, G. S. E.: Diagnostic model and analysis of the
surface currents in the Tropical Pacific Ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32,
2938–2954, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;2938:DMAAOT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;2938:DMAAOT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bourlès, B., Araujo, M., McPhaden, M. J., Brandt, P., Foltz, G. R.,
Lumpkin, R., Giordani, H., Hernandez, F., Lefèvre, N., Nobre, P.,
Campos, E., Saravanan, R., Trotte-Duhà, J., Dengler, M., Hahn, J.,
Hummels, R., Lübbecke, J. F., Rouault, M., Cotrim, L., Sutton, A.,
Jochum, M., and Perez, R. C.: PIRATA: A Sustained Observing System for
Tropical Atlantic Climate Research and Forecasting, Earth Sp. Sci., 6,
577–616, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EA000428" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EA000428</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boutin, J., Chao, Y., Asher, W. E., Delcroix, T., Drucker, R., Drushka, K.,
Kolodziejczyk, N., Lee, T., Reul, N., Reverdin, G., Schanze, J., Soloviev,
A., Yu, L., Anderson, J., Brucker, L., Dinnat, E., Santos-Garcia, A., Jones,
W. L., Maes, C., Meissner, T., Tang, W., Vinogradova, N., and Ward, B.:
Satellite and in situ salinity understanding near-surface stratification and
subfootprint variability, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 1391–1407,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00032.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00032.1</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Camara, I., Kolodziejczyk, N., Mignot, J., Lazar, A., and Gaye, A. T.: On
the seasonal variations of salinity of the tropical Atlantic mixed layer, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120, 4441–4462,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC010865" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC010865</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Caniaux, G., Giordani, H., Redelsperger, J. L., Guichard, F., Key, E., and
Wade, M.: Coupling between the Atlantic cold tongue and the West African
monsoon in boreal spring and summer, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 116, 1–17,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006570" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006570</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Carton, J. A. and Zhou, Z.: Annual cycle of sea surface temperature in the
tropical Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 102, 27813–27824,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC02197" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC02197</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chang, P., Yamagata, T., Schopf, P., Behera, S. K., Carton, J., Kessler, W.
S., Meyers, G., Qu, T., Schott, F., Shetye, S., and Xie, S. P.: Climate
fluctuations of tropical coupled systems – The role of ocean dynamics, J.
Climate, 19, 5122–5174, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3903.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3903.1</a>, 2006.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chavez, F. P. and Messié, M.: A comparison of Eastern Boundary Upwelling
Ecosystems, Prog. Oceanogr., 83, 80–96,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.032" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.032</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chelton, D. B., Deszoeke, R. A., Schlax, M. G., El Naggar, K., and Siwertz,
N.: Geographical variability of the first baroclinic Rossby radius of
deformation, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 433–460,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0433:GVOTFB&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028&lt;0433:GVOTFB&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Da-Allada, C. Y., Alory, G., Du Penhoat, Y., Kestenare, E., Durand, F., and
Hounkonnou, N. M.: Seasonal mixed-layer salinity balance in the tropical
Atlantic Ocean: Mean state and seasonal cycle, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118,
332–345, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008357" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008357</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Da-Allada, C. Y., du Penhoat, Y., Jouanno, J., Alory, G., and Hounkonnou, N.
M.: Modeled mixed-layer salinity balance in the Gulf of Guinea: seasonal and
interannual variability, Ocean Dynam., 64, 1783–1802,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-014-0775-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-014-0775-9</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Da-Allada, C. Y., Jouanno, J., Gaillard, F., Kolodziejczyk, N., Maes, C.,
Reul, N., and Bourlès, B.: Importance of the Equatorial Undercurrent on
the sea surface salinity in the eastern equatorial Atlantic in boreal
spring, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 521–538,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012342" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012342</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dai, A. and Trenberth, K. E.: Estimates of Freshwater Discharge from
Continents: Latitudinal and Seasonal Variations, J. Hydrometeorol., 3,
660–687, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003&lt;0660:EOFDFC&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003&lt;0660:EOFDFC&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
de Boyer Montégut, C., Madec, G., Fischer, A. S., Lazar, A., and
Iudicone, D.: Mixed layer depth over the global ocean: An examination of
profile data and a profile-based climatology, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 109,
1–20, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002378" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002378</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Delcroix, T. and Henin, C.: Seasonal and interannual variations of sea
surface salinity in the tropical Pacific Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 96,
22135–22150, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JC02124" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/91JC02124</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dengler, M. and Rath, W.: Seasonal heat and fresh water mixed-layer balance
climatology, 1–15, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Djakouré, S., Penven, P., Bourlès, B., Veitch, J., and Koné, V.:
Coastally trapped eddies in the north of the Gulf of Guinea, J. Geophys.
Res.-Oceans, 119, 6805–6819,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010243" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010243</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Djakouré, S., Penven, P., Bourlès, B., Koné, V., and Veitch, J.:
Respective roles of the Guinea current and local winds on the coastal
upwelling in the northern Gulf of Guinea, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 47,
1367–1387, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-16-0126.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-16-0126.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Durack, P. J. and Wijffels, S. E.: Fifty-Year trends in global ocean
salinities and their relationship to broad-scale warming, J. Climate, 23,
4342–4362, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3377.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3377.1</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dussin, R., Barnier, B., Brodeau, L., and Molines, J. M.: The making of the
DRAKKAR Forcing Set DFS5, Drakkar, MyOcean Report, Grenoble, 2016 pp., <a href="http://www.drakkar-ocean.eu/publications/reports/report_DFS5v3_April2016.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 27 April 2023), 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Farrar, J. T. and Plueddemann, A. J.: On the Factors Driving Upper-Ocean
Salinity Variability at the Western Edge of the Eastern Pacific Fresh Pool.,
Oceanography (Wash. D. C)., 32, 30–39,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2019.209" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2019.209</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Farrar, J. T., Rainville, L., Plueddemann, A. J., Kessler, W. S., Lee, C.,
Hodges, B. A., Schmitt, R. W., Edson, J. B., Riser, S. C., and Eriksen, C.
C.: Salinity and temperature balances at the SPURS central mooring during
fall and winter, Oceanography, 28, 56–65, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Foltz, G. R. and McPhaden, M. J.: Seasonal mixed layer salinity balance of
the tropical North Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 113, 1–14,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004178" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004178</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Foltz, G. R., Grodsky, S. A., Carton, J. A., and McPhaden, M. J.: Seasonal mixed layer heat budget of the tropical Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 108, 148–227, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001584" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001584</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Foltz, G. R., Grodsky, S. A., Carton, J. A., and McPhaden, M. J.: Seasonal
salt budget of the northwestern tropical Atlantic Ocean along 38°&thinsp;W, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 109, 1–13,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jc002111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jc002111</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Foltz, G. R., Schmid, C., and Lumpkin, R.: Seasonal cycle of the mixed layer
heat budget in the northeastern tropical atlantic ocean, J. Climate, 26,
8169–8188, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00037.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00037.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gordon, A. L. and Bosley, K. T.: Cyclonic gyre in the tropical South
Atlantic, Deep Sea Res., 38, 323–343,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0198-0149(12)80015-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0198-0149(12)80015-x</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Grodsky, S. A., Carton, J. A., Provost, C., Servain, J., Lorenzzetti, J. A.,
and Mcphaden, M. J.: Tropical instability waves at 0°&thinsp;N , 23°&thinsp;W in the Atlantic: A case study using Pilot Research Moored
Array in the Tropical Atlantic (PIRATA) mooring data, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 110, 1–12,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC002941" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC002941</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hagen, E., Feistel, R., Agenbag, J. J., and Ohde, T.: Seasonal and
interannual changes in intense Benguela upwelling (1982–1999), Oceanol.
Acta, 24, 557–568, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0399-1784(01)01173-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0399-1784(01)01173-2</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hasson, A. E. A., Delcroix, T., and Dussin, R.: An assessment of the mixed
layer salinity budget in the tropical Pacific Ocean. Observations and
modelling (1990–2009), Ocean Dynam., 63, 179–194,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-013-0596-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-013-0596-2</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hernandez, O., Jouanno, J., and Durand, F.: Do the Amazon and Orinoco
freshwater plumes really matter for hurricane-induced ocean surface
cooling?, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121, 2119–2141,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011021</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heukamp, F. O., Brandt, P., Dengler, M., Tuchen, F. P., McPhaden, M. J., and
Moum, J. N.: Tropical Instability Waves and Wind-Forced Cross-Equatorial
Flow in the Central Atlantic Ocean, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL099325, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099325" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL099325</a>,
2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Holte, J. and Talley, L.: A new algorithm for finding mixed layer depths
with applications to argo data and subantarctic mode water formation, J.
Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 26, 1920–1939,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHO543.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHO543.1</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Houndegnonto, O. J., Kolodziejczyk, N., Maes, C., Bourlès, B.,
Da-Allada, C. Y., and Reul, N.: Seasonal Variability of Freshwater Plumes in
the Eastern Gulf of Guinea as Inferred From Satellite Measurements, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 126, 1–57, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC017041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC017041</a>,
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huffman, G. J., Adler, R. F., Bolvin, D. T., and Gu, G.: Improving the
global precipitation record: GPCP Version 2.1, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36,
1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040000" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL040000</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hummels, R., Dengler, M., and Bourlès, B.: Seasonal and regional
variability of upper ocean diapycnal heat flux in the Atlantic cold tongue,
Prog. Oceanogr., 111, 52–74, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2012.11.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2012.11.001</a>,
2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hummels, R., Dengler, M., Brandt, P., and Schlundt, M.: Diapycnal heat flux
and mixed layer heat budget within the Atlantic Cold Tongue, Clim. Dynam., 43,
3179–3199, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2339-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2339-6</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jochum, M., Malanotte-Rizzoli, P., and Busalacchi, A.: Tropical instability
waves in the Atlantic Ocean, Ocean Model., 7, 145–163,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-5003(03)00042-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1463-5003(03)00042-8</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jochum, M., Murtugudde, R., Ferrari, R., and Malanotte-Rizzoli, P.: The
Impact of Horizontal Resolution on the Tropical Heat Budget in an Atlantic
Ocean Model, J. Climate, 18, 841–851, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3288.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-3288.1</a>,
2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jouanno, J., Marin, F., Du Penhoat, Y., Sheinbaum, J., and Molines, J. M.:
Seasonal heat balance in the upper 100&thinsp;m of the equatorial Atlantic Ocean,
J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 116, 1–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006912" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006912</a>,
2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jouanno, J., Hernandez, O., and Sanchez-Gomez, E.: Equatorial Atlantic interannual variability and its relation to dynamic and thermodynamic processes, Earth Syst. Dynam., 8, 1061–1069, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-1061-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-1061-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Junker, T., Schmidt, M., and Mohrholz, V.: The relation of wind stress curl
and meridional transport in the Benguela upwelling system, J. Mar. Syst.,
143, 1–6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.10.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.10.006</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Junker, T., Mohrholz, V., Siegfried, L., and van der Plas, A.: Seasonal to
interannual variability of water mass characteristics and currents on the
Namibian shelf, J. Mar. Syst., 165, 36–46,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.09.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.09.003</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kopte, R., Brandt, P., Dengler, M., Tchipalanga, P. C. M., Macuéria, M.,
and Ostrowski, M.: The Angola Current: Flow and hydrographic characteristics
as observed at 11°&thinsp;S, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 1177–1189,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012374" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012374</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kumar, B. P., Vialard, J., Lengaigne, M., Murty, V. S. N., and McPhaden, M.
J.: TropFlux: air-sea fluxes for the global tropical oceans – description
and evaluation, Clim. Dynam., 38, 1521–1543,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1115-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-011-1115-0</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kushnir, Y., Robinson, W. A., Chang, P., and Robertson, A. W.: The physical
basis for predicting Atlantic sector seasonal-to-interannual climate
variability, J. Climate, 19, 5949–5970, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3943.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3943.1</a>,
2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Large, W. G. and Yeager, S. G.: The global climatology of an interannually
varying air – Sea flux data set, Clim. Dynam., 33, 341–364,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0441-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0441-3</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lebedev, K. V, Yoshinari, H., Maximenko, N. A., and Hacker, P. W.: Velocity
data derived from trajectories of Argo floats, IPRC Tech. Note, 2, 20 pp., 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lee, T., Lagerloef, G., Kao, H., McPhaden, M. J., Willis, J., and Gierach,
M. M.: The influence of salinity on tropical Atlantic instability waves, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119, 8375–8394, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010100</a>,
2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lumpkin, R., Grodsky, S. A., Centurioni, L., Rio, M. H., Carton, J. A., and
Lee, D.: Removing spurious low-frequency variability in drifter velocities,
J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 30, 353–360,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00139.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-12-00139.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Morrow, R., Fu, L. L., Ardhuin, F., Benkiran, M., Chapron, B., Cosme, E.,
D'Ovidio, F., Farrar, J. T., Gille, S. T., Lapeyre, G., Le Traon, P. Y.,
Pascual, A., Ponte, A., Qiu, B., Rascle, N., Ubelmann, C., Wang, J., and
Zaron, E.: Global observations of fine-scale ocean surface topography with
the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) Mission, Front. Mar. Sci., 6,
1–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00232" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00232</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Muller, A. A., Reason, C. J. C., Schmidt, M., Mohrholz, V., and Eggert, A.:
Computing transport budgets along the shelf and across the shelf edge in the
northern Benguela during summer (DJF) and winter (JJA), J. Mar. Syst., 140,
82–91, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.02.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.02.007</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ndoye, S., Capet, X., Estrade, P., Sow, B., Dagorne, D., Lazar, A., Gaye,
A., and Brehmer, P.: SST patterns and dynamics of the southern
Senegal-Gambia upwelling center, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119, 8315–8335,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010242" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010242</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ostrowski, M., Da Silva, J. C. B., and Bazik-Sangolay, B.: The response of
sound scatterers to El Ninõ- and La Niña-like oceanographic regimes
in the southeastern Atlantic, ICES J. Mar. Sci., 66, 1063–1072,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsp102" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsp102</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peter, A. C., Le Hénaff, M., du Penhoat, Y., Menkes, C. E., Marin, F.,
Vialard, J., Caniaux, G., and Lazar, A.: A model study of the seasonal mixed
layer heat budget in the equatorial Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 111,
1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003157" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003157</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Philander, S. G. H. and Pacanowski, R. C.: The oceanic response to
cross-equatorial winds (with application to coastal upwelling in low
latitudes), Tellus, 33, 201–210,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v33i2.10708" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v33i2.10708</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Picaut, J.: Propagation of the Seasonal Upwelling in the Eastern Equatorial
Atlantic, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1983)013&lt;0018:potsui&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1983)013&lt;0018:potsui&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rath, W., Dengler, M., Lüdke, J., Schmidtko, S., Schlundt, M., Brandt,
P., Bumke, K., Ostrowski, M., van der Plas, A., Junker, T., Mohrholz, V.,
Sarre, A., Tchipalanga, P. C. M., and Coelho, P.: PREFCLIM: A
high-resolution mixed-layer climatology of the eastern tropical Atlantic, PANGAEA [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.868927" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.868927</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Reason, C. J. C. and Rouault, M.: Sea surface temperature variability in the
tropical southeast Atlantic Ocean and West African rainfall, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 33, 1–5, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027145" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027145</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rodriguez-Fernandez, N. J., Anterrieu, E., Boutin, J., Supply, A., Reverdin,
G., Alory, G., Remy, E., Picard, G., Pellarin, T., and Richaume, P.: The
SMOS-HR Mission: Science Case and Project Status, in: IGARSS 2022–2022, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 7182–7185, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Scannell, H. A. and McPhaden, M. J.: Seasonal Mixed Layer Temperature
Balance in the Southeastern Tropical Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123,
5557–5570, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014099" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014099</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schlundt, M., Brandt, P., Dengler, M., Hummels, R., Fischer, T., Bumke, K.,
Krahmann, G., and Karstensen, J.: Mixed layer heat and salinity budgets
during the onset of the 2011 Atlantic cold tongue, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans,
119, 7882–7910, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010021</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schmidtko, S., Johnson, G. C., and Lyman, J. M.: MIMOC: A global monthly
isopycnal upper-ocean climatology with mixed layers, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118, 1658–1672, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20122</a>,
2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stevenson, J. W. and Niiler, P. P.: Upper Ocean Heat Budget During the
Hawaii-to-Tahiti Shuttle Experiment, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 13, 1894–1907,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1983)013&lt;1894:UOHBDT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1983)013&lt;1894:UOHBDT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Taylor, K. E.: Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single
diagram, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 7183–7192,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tuchen, F. P., Perez, R. C., Foltz, G. R., Brandt, P., and Lumpkin, R.:
Multidecadal Intensification of Atlantic Tropical Instability Waves,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, 1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gl101073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022gl101073</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tzortzi, E., Josey, S. A., Srokosz, M., and Gommenginger, C.: Tropical
atlantic salinity variability: New insights from SMOS, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
40, 2143–2147, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50225" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50225</a>, 2013.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vijith, V., Vinayachandran, P. N., Webber, B. G. M., Matthews, A. J.,
George, J. V., Kannaujia, V. K., Lotliker, A. A., and Amol, P.: Closing the
sea surface mixed layer temperature budget from in situ observations alone:
Operation Advection during BoBBLE, Sci. Rep., 10, 1–12,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63320-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63320-0</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wade, M., Caniaux, G., and Du Penhoat, Y.: Variability of the mixed layer
heat budget in the eastern equatorial Atlantic during 2005–2007 as inferred
using Argo floats, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 116, 1–17,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006683" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006683</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Waliser, D. E. and Gautier, C.: A satellite-derived climatology of the ITCZ,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006&lt;2162:ASDCOT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1993)006&lt;2162:ASDCOT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, L., Jin, X., and Weller, R. A.: Role of net surface heat flux in
seasonal variations of sea surface temperature in the tropical Atlantic
Ocean, J. Climate, 19, 6153–6169, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3970.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3970.1</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
