<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">OS</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Ocean Science</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">OS</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ocean Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1812-0792</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/os-16-907-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Scale-dependent analysis of in situ observations in the mesoscale to submesoscale range around New Caledonia</article-title><alt-title>Scale-dependent analysis around New Caledonia</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Scale-dependent analysis around New Caledonia}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{G.~S\'{e}razin et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sérazin</surname><given-names>Guillaume</given-names></name>
          <email>g.serazin@unsw.edu.au</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7069-5886</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Marin</surname><given-names>Frédéric</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Gourdeau</surname><given-names>Lionel</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Cravatte</surname><given-names>Sophie</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2439-8952</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Morrow</surname><given-names>Rosemary</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Dabat</surname><given-names>Mei-Ling</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Climate Change Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NWS 2052, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>LEGOS/IRD, Toulouse, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>CNRS/LEGOS, Toulouse, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Guillaume Sérazin (g.serazin@unsw.edu.au)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>30</day><month>July</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>907</fpage><lpage>925</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>7</day><month>December</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>19</day><month>December</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3</day><month>June</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day><month>June</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 Guillaume Sérazin et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/907/2020/os-16-907-2020.html">This article is available from https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/907/2020/os-16-907-2020.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/907/2020/os-16-907-2020.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/907/2020/os-16-907-2020.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e139">Small-scale ocean dynamics around New Caledonia (22<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) in the southwest Pacific Ocean occur in regions with substantial mesoscale eddies, complex bathymetry, complex intertwined currents, islands and strong internal tides. Using second-order structure functions applied to observational acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) and thermosalinograph (TSG) datasets, these small-scale dynamics are characterised in the range of scales of 3–100 km in order to determine the turbulent regime at work. A Helmholtz decomposition is used to analyse the contribution of rotational and divergent motions. A surface-intensified regime is shown to be at work south and east of New Caledonia, involving substantial rotational motions such as submesoscale structures generated by mixed layer instabilities and frontogenesis. This regime is, however, absent north of New Caledonia, where mesoscale eddies are weaker and surface available potential energy is smaller at small scales. North of New Caledonia and below 200 m, in the regions south and east of New Caledonia, the dynamical regime at work could be explained by stratified turbulence as divergent and rotational motions have similar contribution, but weakly nonlinear interaction between inertia–gravity waves is also possible as structure functions get close to the empirical spectrum model for inertia–gravity waves. Seasonal variations of the available potential energy reservoir, associated with a change in the vertical profile rather than in horizontal density variance, suggest that submesoscale motions would also seasonally vary around New Caledonia. Overall, a loss of geostrophic balance is likely to occur at scales smaller than 10 km, where the contribution of divergent motions become significant.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e162">Oceanic submesoscale (SM) motions lie between horizontal mesoscale (ME) motions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(10–100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which are strongly constrained by the Earth's rotation and the ocean's aspect ratio, and three-dimensional turbulent processes occurring at scales smaller than a few hundred metres. The ubiquitous nature of these SM features in the global ocean, such as fronts, filaments and SM coherent vortices, has been demonstrated by high-resolution ocean models, satellite observations and dedicated observational programmes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g. LatMix,</named-content></xref>. Although those SM turbulent features represent less kinetic energy (KE) that ME eddies, they may have substantial impacts on heat transport and air–sea heat fluxes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.2"/>, on upper ocean restratification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.3"/> and on biogeochemistry processes such as primary production <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.4"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e195">Inertia–gravity waves (IGWs) are also a key component of the ocean system, sharing similar spatial scales with ME <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(10–100 km) and SM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(0.1–10 km) motions but at faster timescales. IGWs feedback onto climatic timescales by contributing significantly to shape the diapycnal mixing distribution in the ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.5"/>. IGWs include internal tides that are generated by barotropic tides interacting with steep topographic features, then radiate away from their generation site and end their life cycle by breaking and mixing the surrounding water masses. While IGWs have a weak imprint on surface tracer dynamics, both surface velocities and sea surface height (SSH) reflect IGW dynamics as well as balanced motions<fn id="Ch1.Footn1"><p id="d1e215">The term “balanced motions” refers to motions that are in approximate geostrophic or hydrostatic balance.</p></fn>, including ME and SM motions.</p>
      <p id="d1e219">Because of this spatial scale overlap between balanced and IGW motions, understanding the small-scale content of high-resolution observations is not trivial. In particular, the next generation of altimeters will use wide-swath radar interferometry in the Ka band, which will allow the forthcoming Surface Water Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite to sample sea level spatial scales potentially down to 15 km <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.6"/>. Thus, the SWOT satellite will be able to provide more observational information in terms of balanced motions at the short ME range and long SM ranges. Yet, understanding observed features from high-resolution measurements requires us to be able to characterise, and potentially separate, IGWs and balanced motions. SWOT's orbit will also provide richer information on the imprint of internal tides on the SSH and would contribute to improve today's maps of stationary and nonstationary internal tides estimated from altimetry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.7"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. In preparation for these future spatial observations, global maps of the transition scale between balanced and IGW were achieved by applying an elaborated frequency–wavenumber filter to high-resolution model outputs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.8"/>. Tide-resolving submesoscale-permitting ocean models are, however, in their early stages of simulating both balanced and IGW at the same time and need be to confronted with observations.</p>
      <p id="d1e233">In addition to observations from satellite and modelling studies, there exist substantial databases of high-resolution in situ observations, which may be useful sources of information on small-scale oceanic features. One possible way to extract and characterise the small-scale content of in situ observations is to use a scale-dependent analysis. In particular, several studies have used spectral analysis through the usual Fourier transform to characterise the small-scale distribution of KE, based on horizontal velocities from shipboard acoustic Doppler current profilers (SADCPs) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.9"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> and tracer variance from temperature, salinity and chlorophyll measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.10"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.  This type of characterisation has gained popularity, particularly as the SWOT SSH requirements are defined in terms of spectra. Yet, spectral analysis is limited to data with uniform sampling and often requires a priori an interpolation step when applied to in situ observations. In parallel to these spectral analysis, the computation of structure functions (SFs) is a classic method to study the scale dependence of a physical quantity and has been used in early studies of turbulence to confront theories and experimental setups. SFs have been used to characterise the atmospheric KE spectrum in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.11"/>  based on opportunity measurements made by commercial aircraft, while providing insights into the direction of KE cascades <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.12"/>.  Until recently, the use of SFs has been less popular in ocean sciences.</p>
      <p id="d1e253">SFs of temperature and salinity have been computed from Argo floats and provided encouraging physically results <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.13"/>, especially as the non-uniform sampling of Argo data renders the use of the Fourier transform impossible. Applying SF analysis to horizontal velocities measured by drifters  in the Gulf of Mexico, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.14"/> achieved a characterisation of KE and energy transfers over scales ranging from 10 m to 1000 km; such a spatial range can hardly be covered using Fourier techniques. They also used the Helmholtz decomposition to separate rotational and divergent motions, first designed for Fourier analysis by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.15"/> and extended to SFs by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.16"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e268">Using this Helmholtz decomposition, several studies have separated the contribution of waves and vortices (i.e. balanced motions) in the spectral domain applied on SADCP measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.17"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. To do so, the spectrum of potential energy relative to the IGWs needs to be properly resolved by density observations in the vertical or assumed using the standard Garrett–Munk spectrum <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.18"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. In regions of strong ME KE, the transition from balanced to unbalanced motions has been well documented using in situ velocity observations,  with transitions occurring at 15 km  in the Kuroshio extension <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.19"/>, 20 km in the Gulf Stream <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.20"/> and 40 km in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.21"/>. Performing a similar analysis in different regions of the northwest Pacific, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.22"/> have highlighted the sensitivity of the transition scale to the KE levels, with a longer transition scale in regions of weak mesoscale activity. For instance, the latter study estimated the transition scale to exceed 200 km in the North Equatorial Current. The transition between balanced and unbalanced flows is regularly associated with a flattening of the spectral slopes, from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in eddy-active regions. However, this flattening does not occur everywhere in the ocean as the KE spectra computed from ADCP observations in the North Equatorial Current region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.23"/> and in the southern California Current <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.24"/> decrease monotonously, approximately following a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> law. The KE spectrum of balanced motions may also be depth dependent leading to a transition scale that varies with depth; how the KE spectrum varies with depth is regionally dependent <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.25"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page909?><p id="d1e346">These aforementioned observational studies have focused on regions where internal wave activity is generally weak compared to ME and SM motions. In this study, we focus on the southwest Pacific and more specifically around New Caledonia, whose geography and regional circulation are described in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. This area is a peculiar region of the global ocean where both ME activity and internal tides are substantial. In particular, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a shows substantial levels of ME KE, estimated from satellite altimetry maps, south and east of New Caledonia. In these regions, long-lived ME eddies are ubiquitous and travel westward <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.26"/>. Baroclinic instabilities can extract energy from the vertical shear between the eastward-flowing surface Subtropical Countercurrent (STCC) and the underlying westward-flowing South Equatorial Current (SEC) to feed the ME KE <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.27"/>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b shows the stationary part of the M2 internal tide, also estimated from altimetry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.28"/>, that reveals tidal hotspots north and south of New Caledonia. The presence of a complex and steep bathymetry in this region, associated with large barotropic tides, yields substantial internal tides. Around New Caledonia, the modelling study performed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.29"/> suggests that the transition scale between balanced and unbalanced motions is everywhere larger than 150 km on average over the year. This scale may, however, decrease below 50 km in some places during late winter and early spring, as balanced motions undergo substantial seasonal variations south and east of New Caledonia, whereas IGWs undergo substantial seasonal variations north of New Caledonia.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e370">Geography and circulation around New Caledonia reproduced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.30"/>, with the names of islands (black names), thermocline currents (blue curves and names) and surface currents (red curves and names). Indicated are the SEC (South Equatorial Current), NVJ (North Vanuatu Jet), NCJ and SCJ (North and South Caledonian jets), STCC (Subtropical Countercurrent) and EAC (East Australian Current).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/907/2020/os-16-907-2020-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e384">Regions of study (red boxes) around New Caledonia: eddy kinetic energy estimated using Duacs <bold>(a)</bold>, M2 coherent internal tide estimated from satellite altimetry <bold>(b)</bold>, SADCP <bold>(c</bold>) and TSG <bold>(d)</bold> sections performed in the southwest Pacific.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/907/2020/os-16-907-2020-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e406">Based only on in situ observations, this paper aims at a better understanding of the dynamics involved in this region over the small-scale wavelength range from 3 to 100 km, including both balanced and IGW motions that are not well captured in current gridded altimetry products. To do so, we use a scale-dependent analysis based on both SFs, applied to existing in situ datasets including SADCP and thermosalinograph (TSG) measurements. In order to anticipate the future altimetric swath observations and to design joint experiments where in situ observing systems are deployed under SWOT ground tracks, we address here three main issues. (1) How are KE and tracer variance distributed in the range of a wavelength scale of 3–100 km around New Caledonia?  (2) Are there spatial and seasonal variations of those distributions? (3) What kind of dynamical information can we infer from those distributions?</p>
      <p id="d1e409">Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> describes the data we used from different observing systems: upper ocean velocities from shipboard ADCPs, surface temperature and salinity from TSGs, and sea level from altimetric data. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> presents the computation of structure functions applied on SADCP and TSG data. Results obtained from SFs computed on horizontal velocities from SADCP are shown in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>. The seasonality of SFs computed on surface tracers from TSG is shown in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/> draws the conclusions and discusses the small-scale characteristics obtained in the 3–100 km range using our scale-dependent approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Horizontal velocities from shipboard acoustic Doppler current profilers</title>
      <p id="d1e437">Horizontal velocity can be reliably measured by SADCPs mounted on the hull of vessels during transits or research cruises. We use the historical transects around New Caledonia gathered into one dataset by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.31"/> in order to describe the regional circulation. This database consists of a collection of 109 cruises that have acquired measurements of longitudinal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and transverse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> velocities from 1990 to 2014 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.32"><named-content content-type="pre">see Table 1 of </named-content><named-content content-type="post"> for a full description</named-content></xref>. The SADCP data come from different institutes: IRD (73), JASADCP database from the University of Hawaii (11), CSIRO (23), JAMSTEC data centre (2). Most of the data are provided by 150 kHz SADCP instruments and cover an average range of 25 to 300 m depth, with an average vertical resolution of 8 m and an average temporal resolution of 5 min. Some SADCP instruments also provide measurements closer to the surface and down to 500 m depth. The available SADCP sections are shown in  Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c. More details about data quality control and data filtering applied at this stage are given in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.33"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e478">The SADCP database has been edited to retain only data meeting certain requirements for computing structure functions. We have only considered high-frequency SADCP: ship tracks with minimal temporal sampling slower than 15 min were discarded from the analysis. The ship cruising speed must be faster than 4 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (around 8 knots); this condition aims at avoiding the subsampling of internal waves whose average phase velocity is around 1 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ocean. The segments were defined so that the ship travels almost in a straight line, with a 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> variation of the ship heading allowed. This condition is not necessary as we will use the assumption of isotropy in the following analyses, but it turned out to be efficient to avoid very long and winding trajectories. A<?pagebreak page910?> maximum time break of 15 min between measurement is allowed within the same segment; longer time breaks result in the data split into different segments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Sea surface temperature and salinity from thermosalinograph data</title>
      <p id="d1e522">High-resolution near-surface temperature and salinity have been collected by the French Sea Surface Salinity Observation Service (SSS-SNO) from voluntary observing ships (mainly merchant ships) using TSG instruments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.34"/>. Tracers are measured near surface because seawater is pumped between 5 and 10 m depth on the side of the hull, depending on the ship configuration. Measurements are made every 15 s and are averaged every 5 min by taking the median. The average spatial resolution associated with this 5 min temporal resolution is around 2.5 km for a 20-knot cruise speed. The TSG data can be downloaded from the LEGOS Sea Surface Salinity database<fn id="Ch1.Footn2"><p id="d1e528"><uri>http://www.legos.obs-mip.fr/observations/sss/</uri> (last access: 20 July 2020)</p></fn>. Only delayed-time data flagged as “good” and “probably good” have been extracted and used in this study. Delayed-time data undergo a more severe quality control than real-time data using the TSG-QC software<fn id="Ch1.Footn3"><p id="d1e534"><uri>http://www.ird.fr/us191/spip.php?article63</uri> (last access: 20 July 2020)</p></fn>. Flags are automatically attributed and are checked using visual inspection. Corrections of TSG time series are applied if needed by comparison with daily water samples and Argo data. More details about measurements, processing and quality control of TSG data may be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.35"/>.</p>
      <?pagebreak page911?><p id="d1e543">The SSS-SNO network is global but has a better coverage in the tropical Pacific and in the North Atlantic. Thus, this dataset is particularly suited to study high-resolution surface tracers in the southwest Pacific. Available sections around New Caledonia are presented in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>d. Although the temperature and salinity are measured at 5–10 m depth, we will assume in the rest of the study that they are representative of the tracer behaviour at the top of the mixed layer and we will use the terms sea surface temperature (SST) and sea surface salinity (SSS). We apply the same tests and the same segmentation criteria to the TSG dataset as we do to the ADCP dataset.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Surface to interior oceanic properties from Argo climatology</title>
      <p id="d1e556">The climatologies of temperature and salinity over the first 500 m of the water column are taken from the Roemmich–Gilson Argo climatology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.36"/>  computed over the period 2004–2016<fn id="Ch1.Footn4"><p id="d1e562"><uri>http://sio-argo.ucsd.edu/RG_Climatology.html</uri> (last access: 20 July 2020)</p></fn>. This Argo climatology is used to better characterise and understand the seasonal variations of the surface and interior oceanic properties jointly with the results obtained from the TSG and SADCP datasets. Exponential profiles of the vertical stratification <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are fitted to determine an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-folding scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and a surface extrapolated buoyancy frequency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These quantities will be used in the following to determine the empirical model for IGWs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Regions of interest</title>
      <p id="d1e616">Based on large-scale considerations provided by the EKE and M2 climatology maps (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a, b), as well as former studies around New Caledonia, we have selected four regions, delimited by red lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, having different characteristics in terms of mesoscale activity and internal wave activity.</p>
      <p id="d1e623">Region VAUB  corresponds to the 100 km wide Vauban Channel between the New Caledonia main island and the Loyalty Islands <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.37"/>. In this channel, a mean southeastward current, extending to at least 500 m depth, flows against the mean trade winds, overlying a deeper northwestward current. From Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>, this small region has relatively small EKE and weak M2 internal tides. Yet, the interpolated altimetric product might underestimate EKE in this region because of the proximity of coastlines; this will also impact the mapping technique used to produce the M2 climatology. In situ observations have revealed that the Vauban current is strongly modulated at intraseasonal timescales by large ME eddies propagating westward <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.38"/>. Velocity observations measured by SADCP in this region have shown substantial semi-diurnal currents, likely related to baroclinic tides <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.39"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e637">Region ECAL is the large box situated east of New Caledonia, centred on the southern branch of the SEC. This region exhibits high ME EKE and substantial M2 internal tides. The internal tides in the SCAL region are likely to radiate from surrounding seamounts and islands. Region SCAL is situated south of New Caledonia and comprises high ME EKE as well as strong M2 internal tides, the latter arising partly from the generation site at the southern tip of New Caledonia. As mentioned in the introduction, those regions may involve substantial baroclinic instabilities that partly explains the large levels of EKE <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.40"/>. Long-lived westward-travelling ME eddies also pass through those regions and contribute to EKE <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.41"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e646">Region NCAL is situated north of New Caledonia and west of the Vanuatu islands. This region is less energetic than the southern ones in terms of ME activity but has substantial M2 tidal amplitude and is close to several generation sites induced by island topography. There is observational evidence that weak ME eddies may be generated in the lee of the Vanuatu islands <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.42"/>. The NCAL region excludes the high-variability band at 16<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S that is suggested to arise from barotropic instability between the North Vanuatu Jet and the surrounding countercurrents <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.43"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e665">In these regions around New Caledonia, the first mode of the M2 internal wave is dominant and accounts for over 30 %–50 % of the total M2 tidal energy conversion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.44"/>. The dissipation of M2 internal wave energy is also amongst the strongest in the world's oceans, with a substantial contribution coming from wave–wave interactions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.45"/>.  The amplitude of coherent M2 mode 1 in terms of sea level variations ranges between 1 and 4 cm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.46"><named-content content-type="pre">see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>;</named-content></xref>; the amplitude of mode 2 is much weaker and estimated to be between 1 and 3 mm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.47"/>. In terms of wavelength, M2 mode 1 scales between 120 and 150 km, mode 2 scales between 60 and 70 km, and mode 3 scales between 40 and 50 km <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.48"/></p>
      <p id="d1e686">These regions are well sampled by shipboard ADCPs and TSGs,  as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>c–d. All of these four regions will be crossed during the SWOT fast-sampling phase (black lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a–b). They are identified as possible case studies to better understand the small-scale SSH signal, jointly with in situ datasets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.49"/>. The averaged hydrographic profiles (temperature, salinity, density and stratification) measured by ARGO floats are given for each region in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e700">Mean seasonal profiles  of temperature (blue), salinity (red), potential density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> referenced to the surface pressure (green) and buoyancy frequency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (orange), separated into a cool season (June to November, solid curves) and a warm season (December to May, dashed curves).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/907/2020/os-16-907-2020-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Structure functions</title>
      <p id="d1e747">Whilst most studies have used spectral techniques <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.50"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> to characterise the scale-dependent distribution of  horizontal velocities, measured by SADCP along ship tracks, we prefer using structure functions (SFs) as applied to atmospheric velocities measured during aircraft flights <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.51"/>. The use of SFs is mainly motivated by the fact that SFs are more suited to study uneven observations in space.<?pagebreak page912?> Less preprocessing is needed compared to Fourier methods, which often requires interpolation of velocity measurements on equidistant samples, detrending and windowing. However, SFs may only be applied on physical quantities whose scale-dependent variance decreases gently, that is for characterising spectra less steep than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.52"/>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the horizontal wavenumber.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>General definition</title>
      <p id="d1e789">We define the increment of a given quantity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (a scalar or a vector field) between a position vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and a position vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a separation vector, as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M27" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            Under the assumptions of homogeneity (i.e. the statistics do not depend on the position <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and stationarity (i.e. the statistic do not depend on time), the second-order SF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> associated with the variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>  is computed as
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M31" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over all position vectors <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. We will also use the assumption of isotropy; that is, the statistics do not depend on the orientation of the separation vectors but only on the distance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) will be directly applied to compute one-dimensional temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, salinity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and buoyancy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SFs by isotropically averaging over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1065">Under the previous assumptions, an analytical relationship can be derived between the second-order SF of the variable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and its power spectrum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx2" id="paren.53"/>:
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M42" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the zeroth-order Bessel function of the first kind. If one assumes that the power spectrum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, then  Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) may used to derive that the associated SF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  increases proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.54"/>. In the case of strong nonlocal dynamics, the power spectrum is steeper than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and SF saturates at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, making<?pagebreak page913?> it impossible for SFs to distinguish between different regimes involving nonlocal dynamics.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Total, transverse and longitudinal velocity SFs</title>
      <p id="d1e1288">In order to analyse the scale-dependent distribution of horizontal KE, the computation of the total second-order velocity SF (VSF) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will be deduced from the longitudinal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and transverse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> second-order VSF, isotropically averaged over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, so that
              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M55" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
            These longitudinal and transverse VSFs are computed using a similar definition as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.55"/>:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M56" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>‖</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              This definition is particularly useful because it does not depend on the coordinate system used and therefore does not require to rotate velocity components prior to the calculation of each increment <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The longitudinal and transverse VSFs will be computed on zonal and meridional velocities from the SADCP dataset presented in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>3.1.3</label><title>Helmholtz decomposition</title>
      <p id="d1e1573">The Helmholtz decomposition has fundamental applications in fluid dynamics as it provides a mathematical way to decompose the velocity field as the sum of two components, one purely rotational and one purely divergent. This Helmholtz decomposition has recently been extended to be used in the spectral domain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.56"/> and with VSFs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.57"/>. Balanced motions – in geostrophic or hydrostatic approximate balance – are mainly associated with rotational motions. IGWs or stratified turbulence have, however, a strong divergent component and may also have a non-negligible rotational component.</p>
      <p id="d1e1582">Under the assumption of homogeneity and isotropy, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.58"/> showed that this separation between rotational and divergent motions is straightforward using VSFs. The rotational VSF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the divergent VSF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are simply derived from two integrals of the longitudinal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and transverse <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> VSFs:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M62" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>7</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>8</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo><mml:mo>⟂</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo><mml:mo>∥</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e1844"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Thus, we will use a total of three quantities deduced from the measured horizontal velocities to interpret the scale-dependent distribution of KE:  total, rotational and divergent VSFs. The spectral slopes associated with the total VSF will also be computed as well as the mean ratio of the divergent and rotational VSFs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Classic power laws and relevant turbulence theories</title>
      <p id="d1e1891">In addition to the Helmholtz decomposition, power laws estimated on SFs and spectra can be used to infer the dynamics at work. However, there are two limitations in predicting the turbulence regime using only the slopes of the KE spectra. On one hand, a typical value of a spectral slopes may correspond to different dynamical regimes. On the other hand, several dynamical regimes can combine or overlap at a certain range of scales, in our case, balanced motions and IGWs. In this section, we briefly review the different theories available to describe turbulent regimes occurring in the ocean by focusing on the corresponding spectra/SF scaling laws for KE and tracer variance as well as the ratio of divergent and rotational VSFs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Kinetic energy</title>
      <p id="d1e1915">The first scaling law for KE was introduced  by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.59"/> for three-dimensional isotropic homogeneous turbulence. Using a dimensional analysis, he predicted an inertial range where KE decreases proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) corresponding to a forward cascade of KE, eventually leading to dissipation at small scales. A similar analysis was later performed for two-dimensional horizontal turbulence <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.60"/> yielding two inertial ranges: a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) range corresponding to an inverse cascade of KE and a steeper <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) range corresponding to a forward cascade of enstrophy. When simple stratification is added to the quasi-geostrophic equations, baroclinic instability becomes the main source of  KE around scales close to the internal deformation radius, yet turbulence behaves as in two-dimensional flows with similar inertial ranges <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.61"/>. For quasi-geostrophic dynamics, the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is expected to be small because rotational motions dominate.</p>
      <p id="d1e2035">Quasi-geostrophic turbulence, however, should hold only for balanced motions that are characterised by a strong rotational component and a Rossby number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Ro</mml:mi><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At smaller scales, geostrophic balance weakens and the contribution of ageostrophic components, having both rotational and divergent components, becomes substantial. In particular, frontogenesis processes are accelerated by ageostrophic motions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.62"/> and are predicted to yield <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) spectra <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.63"/>. At similar scales, i.e. 1–10 km, symmetric and baroclinic instabilities occurring in the mixed layer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.64"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> substantially<?pagebreak page914?> energise submesoscale motions near the surface and also yield KE spectra close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.65"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2104">Overlapping with the previous regimes, IGWs span frequencies from inertial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to buoyancy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and are associated with a wide range of horizontal scales, tied to the previous frequencies by the IGW dispersion relation. Since the seminal work of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.66"/>, the IGW continuum spectrum has been shown to be a robust feature in the global ocean and can be estimated by the Garrett–Munk (GM) empirical model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.67"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g. </named-content></xref>.  This model shows that IGW spectrum scales as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the shortwave limit but flattens out at scales larger than 10 km <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.68"><named-content content-type="pre">see also</named-content></xref>. Since our scales of interest is in the range of 1–100 km,  we cannot infer IGWs directly from spectral slopes and we use  instead the GM model spectrum converted into structure functions using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>). One may also distinguish waves with frequencies <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that yield a ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  and near-inertial waves with frequencies close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">≳</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.69"/> .</p>
      <p id="d1e2210">Stratified turbulence is also a turbulence regime possibly at work at small scales, that yields KE spectra close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), associated with a forward cascade of KE involving contributions from ageostrophic components <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.70"/> and characterised by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.71"/>. Stratified turbulence has been suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.72"/>  to explain why the observed atmospheric SFs scale as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at small scales.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Tracers and potential energy</title>
      <p id="d1e2299">Following Kolmogorov-like arguments, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.73"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.74"/> predicted that the spectrum of tracer variance decreases with the similar rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as KE does in the direct cascade range for quasi-geostrophic turbulence. More generally, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="text.75"/> reviews how KE and tracer variance spectra are linked for KE spectral slopes less steep than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  For steeper KE spectra, the stirring is nonlocal and dominated by a single eddy-turnover timescale and yields a tracer variance spectrum rolling off as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), characteristic of a Batchelor spectrum <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.76"/>.  On the contrary surface frontogenesis, stirring active and passive tracers locally, yields a spectral distribution tracer variance following a logarithmic slope of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.77"/>, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for tracer SFs. Other surface-intensified processes involving substantial ageostrophic flows such as mixed layer dynamics may also explain this <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) power laws <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.78"/>. Finally, the internal wave continuum induces similar spectral/SF slopes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.79"/>, for scales smaller than 10 km, but slopes flatten out at larger scale. The imprint of internal waves on surface tracers is, however, expected to be weak.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e2471">We present here the results of the SFs applied on velocity and surface tracer data around New Caledonia. First, the VSFs are used to discuss the dynamical regime at work in the upper 500 m of the ocean. As not enough ADCP data are available to capture the annual cycle with the VSFs, the tracer SFs are then used to discuss of the seasonality of upper ocean dynamics.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Velocity structure functions</title>
      <p id="d1e2481">Second-order SFs are computed on longitudinal and transverse velocity components for the four regions of study on each ADCP ship track. The VSFs are averaged over different depth ranges: a surface layer at 0–100 m, a transition layer ranging from 100 to 200 m and an ocean interior layer ranging from 200 to 500 m. Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> show the SFs over these three layers for the four regions of study for the range of spatial scales of 3–100 km. The Helmholtz decomposition is eventually performed on every layer to separate the contribution of the rotational and divergent components. These operations are performed on each ADCP segments, then the median is computed. Confidence intervals at 5 % and 95 % are estimated using a bootstrap method by performing 10 000 realisations of randomly chosen ADCP segments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2490">Mean velocity structure functions computed on each segment in the VAUB <bold>(a, c, e)</bold> and ECAL <bold>(b, d, f)</bold> regions plotted in the range of 3–100 km. Longitudinal  and transverse structure functions (not shown) are used to compute the total SFs (green curve) as well as the associated rotational (red) and divergent (purple) SFs. The total structure functions are also shown for each segment (shaded grey curves) inside the region of study. Classic power laws (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are plotted for reference with oceanic turbulence theories as well as the GM spectrum structure function (GM81). Colour shading corresponds to confidence intervals at 5 % and 95 %, estimated from a bootstrap method.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/907/2020/os-16-907-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2541">Same as Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> but for the NCAL <bold>(a, c, e)</bold> and SCAL <bold>(b, d, f)</bold> regions.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/907/2020/os-16-907-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2559">In the VAUB region, the surface layer  shows that the total VSF (green curve) has a slope close to 1 (1.01) consistent with surface-intensified dynamics (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a). The total VSF slope tends to decrease with depth to get closer to the power law <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ocean interior (slopes of 0.76 and 0.56, respectively, for the 100–200 and 200–500 m ranges shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c–f). In the surface layer, the rotational VSF (red curve) contributes significantly to most of the total VSF over the 3–100 km range and clearly dominates the divergent SF (purple curve). Deeper in the water column (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c–f), the rotational VSF still dominates in the 10–100 km range but its contribution to the total VSF drops in the 3–10 km range as the divergent SF contribution increases. The contribution of rotational and divergent motions become equivalent under 10 km in the 100–200 m layer and around 10 km in the 200–500 m layer, albeit with large uncertainties for the latter layer due to the quality of the data. In the 200–500 m layer, the shape of the total VSF more closely follows the shape of GM SF (black curve in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>e), while the average ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 0.6 (compared to 0.3 for the other layers).</p>
      <?pagebreak page915?><p id="d1e2601">Thus, VSF analysis shows that the VAUB region is consistent with a surface-intensified regime, dominated by rotational dynamics over the ME to SM range, with a VSF slope consistent with frontogenesis and mixed layer dynamics. These surface dynamics contrast with the ocean interior as divergent dynamics become more substantial with depth and the slope of the total VSF tend to flatten towards <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Although the VSFs get close to the shape of the GM SF,  the divergent VSF never exceeds the rotational VSF in the interior as the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is smaller than unity. Stratified turbulence is then more likely to be at work than weak interactions between IGWs to yield such VSF shape. The interior layer (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>e) is, however, uncertain because less valid data are available at those depths, as shown by the large confidence intervals in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>e.</p>
      <p id="d1e2636">The VSF functions computed on SADCP data in the ECAL region (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b, d, f) exhibit similar results than the VAUB region. The slope of the total VSF decreases with depth from 0.87 at surface (0–100 m) to 0.65 in the interior (200–500 m). The rotational motions (red curve) also dominate at surface but their relative contribution to the total VSF decreases with depth as divergent motions (purple curve) become more substantial. In the transition layer (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c), divergent and rotational VSFs have a similar amplitude in the range of 3–10 km, whereas rotational motions still dominate the range of 10–100 km, yielding an average ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.49. VSFs computed in the interior layer (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>e) are less precise, with large confidence intervals, but they suggest that divergent motions have a substantial impact over the whole range of spatial scales (3–100 km) as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gets slightly<?pagebreak page916?> larger than unity (1.55). In this interior layer, the total VSF also resembles the GM structure function, suggesting, jointly with the previous value <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, that weak interactions between IGWs are possibly at work to generate the observed VSFs. As <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is close to unity, nonlinear interactions due to stratified turbulence could also be at work.</p>
      <p id="d1e2702">The NCAL region (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>a, c, e) differs from the ECAL and VAUB regions as the slope of the total VSF is already close to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> law at the surface (0.71) and consequently decreases with depth to a lesser extent (to a value of 0.49). At the surface, rotational and divergent VSFs have a similar magnitude over the range of 3–100 km with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> being equal to 1.07. Rotational and divergent motions have also a similar contribution in the intermediate layer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), albeit with weaker variance that also impacts on the slope of the total VSFs (green curve). Averaged results in the ocean interior (200–500 m) are not qualitatively different but SFs (grey curves) are noisier due to data of lesser quality at these depths. Unlike the ECAL and VAUB regions, surface dynamics in the NCAL region seem to be weak or potentially masked by more substantial unbalanced dynamics. The values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> close to unity suggest that stratified turbulence might be at work but weak interactions between IGWs with frequencies close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> might also be responsible for the observed VSFs. The resemblance between the shape of the GM VSF and the total VSF, especially in the interior layers, also<?pagebreak page917?> argues that observed VSFs could be consistent with IGW interactions.</p>
      <p id="d1e2777">In the SCAL region (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>b, d, f), the surface and intermediate layers show a total VSF with slopes close to 0.8, between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> power laws. Rotational motions (red curve) dominate over the whole range of scales (3–100 km), involving a substantial role of SM and ME processes, albeit the VSF slope is not fully consistent with frontogenesis and mixed layer dynamics. In the ocean interior (200–500 m; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>f), the slope of the total VSF slightly decreases to 0.76 as divergent motions becomes substantial in the 10–100 km range and equivalent to rotational motions in the 3–10 km range, yielding an average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.8 (compared to 0.4 for the other layers). In this layer, the regime at work is not clear because rotational motions have a slightly larger contribution to the total VSF than divergent motions. The equivalent contribution of rotational and divergent motions at smaller scales suggests, however, that  stratified turbulence could be at work. In this region, the contribution of divergent motions to the total VSF might keep increasing with depth, as seen in the other regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e2817">Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> show that the total VSFs tend to flatten with depth in each of the four regions, albeit this decrease is less clear for the NCAL and SCAL regions. To illustrate this tendency, we compute averaged slopes for each total VSFs over 30 m bins of depth. Slopes less than 0.2 were discarded from the analysis because they are likely to be due to instrumental noise (i.e. a slope close to 0 characterises an uncorrelated signal). Results are plotted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a and clearly show a dependence with depth for the four regions. This depth dependence also supports our decomposition into a surface layer (0–100 m) where the VSF slope is relatively constant between 0.75 and 1, a transition layer where the VSF slope rapidly drops (100–200 m) and the interior layer where the VSF slope slightly decreases to reach values between 0.5 and 0.6. Note that the uncertainty on the VSF slopes at depth are stronger because less valid data are available. As previously noticed, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a also shows that the transition with depth is less marked for the NCAL region.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2831">Evolution of the total structure function slope with depth for the range of 3–100 km <bold>(a)</bold>. Classic power laws (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are plotted for reference with oceanic turbulence theories. Scale-dependent Rossby number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Ro</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> estimated from the total structure function averaged over depth <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/907/2020/os-16-907-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2888">In order to assess the scales at which the quasi-geostrophic balance is likely to hold, we infer the scale-dependent Rossby number from the total VSF as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M120" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Ro</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">U</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The scale-dependent Rossby number is computed in each region and averaged over all depth. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b shows that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Ro</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> logically increases as the scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Ro</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being close to unity at the kilometric scale for all regions of study. At scales larger than 10 km, the Rossby number is large enough (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to consider that rotation effects dominate the dynamics and suggests that total VSFs with large rotational components are associated with quasi-geostrophic eddies at those scales. Below 10 km, a loss of geostrophic balance is likely to happen, and substantial ageostrophic motions would imprint on velocity divergence. This assessment is confirmed by a substantial contribution of the divergent VSFs (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>) at scales smaller than 10 km for all the layers and regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e2964">In summary, the analysis of VSFs computed on SADCP measurements suggests that there is a surface-intensified regime at work in the VAUB and ECAL regions, and to a lesser extent in the SCAL region. Close to the surface (0–100 m), such a regime is in accordance with mixed layer dynamics and frontogenesis in the VAUB and ECAL regions, involving quasi-geostrophic vortices at scales <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km with a predominant rotational component, whereas smaller scales are likely to undergo a loss of balance as the contribution of divergent motions increases. In the interior layer (200–500 m), divergent motions have generally equivalent amplitude as rotational motions, suggesting that stratified turbulence could be at work in the ocean interior. The hypothesis of a regime involving weak interactions between IGWs is also plausible as the shape of the total VSFs resembles that of the GM VSFs in some regions. Finally, the NCAL region does not show a surface-intensified regime, except for a slight transition of the slope of the total VSFs. The NCAL region seems to be rather impacted by IGWs in all the layers studied, in a similar way to the interior layer of the other regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e2977">The presence of substantial rotational motions in the ECAL and SCAL regions is consistent with substantial ME EKE estimated from altimetry and associated with baroclinic instabilities and westward-travelling ME eddies in those regions (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>). There is a discrepancy between the EKE map in the VAUB region and the importance of rotational motions in this region, perhaps due to an underestimate of sea level variance by mapping altimetric data close to the coast.<?pagebreak page918?> The relative importance of divergent motions compared to rotational motions in region NCAL is also consistent with weak ME EKE and substantial coherent internal tides in this region.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Tracer structure functions</title>
      <p id="d1e2990">To provide complementary insights into surface small-scale dynamics and analyse their seasonal variations, second-order SFs are now computed on each segment of surface tracers measured by shipboard TSGs in the NCAL, ECAL and SCAL  regions. The TSG coverage over the VAUB region does not allow an accurate computation of surface tracer SFs, which are therefore not shown. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> shows the SFs computed on surface temperature (SST; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a–c), salinity (SSS, red curves) and density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, green curves) from 3 up to 1000 km for each regions. The SFs of SST, SSS, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been, respectively, adimensionalised by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (thermal expansion coefficient), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (haline contraction coefficient) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1025</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> being the reference density of seawater. The coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were computed between consecutive TSG observations and averaged over each segment. This normalisation allows the comparison of the different tracer SFs on the same plot. The SFs of each segment are averaged over two different seasons of the year: one cool season (solid curves) from June to November and one warm season (dashed curves) from December to May. As for VSFs, confidence intervals at 5 % and 95 % are estimated using a similar bootstrap method.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3098">Second-order structure functions computed for sea surface salinity (SSS, red curves), sea surface temperature (SST, blue curves), sea surface density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, green curves) in three regions surroundings New Caledonia: NCAL <bold>(a)</bold>, ECAL <bold>(b)</bold> and SCAL <bold>(c)</bold>. Seasonality is shown between cool (June to November, solid curves) and warm (December to May, dashed curves) seasons. Values of the structure function slopes, estimated between 3 and 100 km, are given in the caption. Colour shading corresponds to confidence intervals at 5 % and 95 %, estimated from a bootstrap method.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/907/2020/os-16-907-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3126">First, the dynamical regimes can be discussed in light of the tracer SF slopes, estimated over the range of 3–100 km and given in the legend of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>. The slopes of the temperature SFs are close to 1.2 for the two seasons in all the regions, except during the warm season in the NCAL region where it reaches 1.33. The temperature SFs are slightly steeper than those of salinity SFs, whose slopes are comprised between 0.93 and 1.07, close to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> law. The slopes of density SFs mostly reflect the slopes of temperature SFs and range from 1.09 to 1.21. Surface tracer SFs are therefore consistent with stirring induced by frontogenesis processes and submesoscale motions in the ECAL and NCAL regions, albeit the SST and density SFs are slightly steeper than theoretical prediction (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slope). Those tracer SF slopes are also consistent with those of the VSFs presented earlier principally in the ECAL region. The discrepancies between tracer and velocity SFs in the NCAL and the SCAL regions could be explained by the substantial IGWs occurring in these regions that possibly have a significant imprint on horizontal velocities near the surface but not on surface tracers. No substantial seasonal variation is noticed on the slope of the tracer VSFs, meaning that the rate of stirring by mesoscale and submesoscale structures is not seasonally dependent. Note that tracer SFs in the SCAL region are more uncertain, as shown by the large confidence intervals in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c due to fewer TSG segments available.</p>
      <?pagebreak page919?><p id="d1e3156">The quality and the quantity of the TSG measurements allow the computation of tracer SFs up to scales as large as 1000 km, providing additional information in the range of 100–1000 km that was missing in the VSF analysis. For scales larger than 100 km, the tracer SF slopes seem to follow the same power law for the NCAL and SCAL regions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a, c), whereas the slopes tend to flatten in the ECAL regions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>b) towards a zero slope. A <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slope may indicate that the SF is uncorrelated at larger scales, perhaps because the assumption that turbulent statistics can be sampled with a moving vessel fails at those scales. However, a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slope is also compatible with nonlocal stirring of passive tracers by large-scale dominant eddies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.80"/>. The latter hypothesis is consistent with a similar flattening of tracer spectra (from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) shown by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.81"/> in the subtropical North Atlantic using TSG data. Note that the ECAL region is particularly impacted by westward-propagating mesoscale structures, which are likely to follow quasi-geostrophic behaviour and explain large-scale stirring with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e3245">Although there is no significant seasonal variation of the tracer SF slopes, a striking feature of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> is the seasonal variations of the amplitude of salinity and temperature SFs that are significative in the NCAL and ECAL regions, albeit with an opposite behaviour. Temperature SFs have larger amplitude during the cool season as opposed to the warm season, whereas salinity SFs have weaker amplitude during the cool season compared to the warm season. The seasonal variations of the density SFs are much weaker and cannot be properly disentangled because of the associated uncertainties; the median, however, suggests a similar seasonality as the temperature SFs. Because neither the temperature SFs nor the salinity SFs exceed the amplitude of the density SFs, no compensation between salinity and temperature is at work in those regions. On the contrary, there are constructive effects between salinity and temperature, whose intensity depends on the season; stronger constructive effects between temperature and salinity occur during the warm season. The tracer SFs in the SCAL region are noisier, with large confidence intervals that hamper the detection of a significant seasonality. The median tracer SFs, however, suggest similar seasonality to that noticed in the NCAL and ECAL regions.</p>
      <p id="d1e3250">To explore further the relative importance of temperature and salinity over spatial scales, the scale-dependent absolute density ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may be inferred directly from the temperature and salinity SFs:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M145" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msqrt><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          This ratio is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a for the three regions of study averaged during the cool and warm seasons. For all those cases, the density ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is larger than unity over all scales, meaning that temperature effects dominate over salinity effects, except for the NCAL region during the cool season where both effects are equivalent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The density ratio also tends to decrease with smaller scales, meaning that salinity effects on density become more important at small scales. At scales larger than 200 km, discrepancies between regions start to appear but less data are available at those scales; hence, there are more uncertainties. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a also exhibits a seasonality of the density ratio with larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values during the cool season and smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values during the warm season. Thus, the relative contribution of temperature and salinity to density varies with seasons.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e3398">Absolute density ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold> and structure function of available potential energy <bold>(a)</bold> as a function of the separation vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the regions NCAL (blue), ECAL (orange) and SCAL (green). Seasonality is shown between cool  (June to November, solid curves) and warm (December to May, dashed curves) seasons. In panel <bold>(a)</bold>, the black horizontal line corresponds to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; above this line, temperature dominates density variation. In panel <bold>(b)</bold>, the dashed–dotted black line correspond to the power law <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/16/907/2020/os-16-907-2020-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3470">Can we link the seasonal variations of tracer SFs and those of the vertical hydrographic profiles? In the NCAL and ECAL regions, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows that the upper 100 m of the ocean also undergo seasonal variations. During the cool season, salinity close to the upper 50 m tends to increase in relation to the seasonality of  the South Pacific Convergence Zone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.82"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, leading to a reduction of the salinity stratification in the upper 100 m. This surface saltening during the cool season is associated with weaker salinity variance at small scales, as shown by the smaller amplitude of salinity SFs (red curves in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). In the SCAL region, the weak seasonal variation in the salinity profile is associated with weak seasonality in salinity SFs during this season. The opposite effect happens for upper ocean temperature. While temperature and its associated stratification are reduced in the upper 100 m during the cool season, in relation to the seasonal variations of the solar input and the mixed layer, small-scale temperature variance increases as shown by the larger amplitude of temperature SFs during this season (blue curves in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). Although the upper ocean density tends to decrease during the warm season as stratification increases (bottom row in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>), the density SFs do not seem to be influenced by this seasonal variation, contrary to temperature and salinity.  Thus, no clear dynamical link between seasonal variations of the hydrographic profiles and tracer SFs seems to emerge from this analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e3487">Although the seasonality of EKE cannot be inferred from the VSFs because of the lack of data, the seasonality of the EKE counterpart that is the available potential energy (APE) can be inferred from the density SFs and the vertical profile of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The corresponding SF for the APE near the surface is estimated as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M155" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">APE</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gravitational acceleration. As TSG measures temperature and salinity between 5 and 10 m depth, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is taken averaged in this depth range from the Argo climatological mean profiles for each region. The APE  represents the reservoir of energy that can be converted into EKE by oceanic instabilities. The APE SFs are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b for the three regions and for the two seasons. First of all, there are substantial seasonal variations with more APE during the cool season (solid curves)  than during the warm season (dashed curves). The finding of seasonal variation of<?pagebreak page920?> the APE in the ECAL and SCAL regions is consistent with the seasonal modulation of the EKE in the South Pacific STCC shown by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.83"/> using altimetric data: EKE increases during the cool season (June–November) to peak in November/December, whereas EKE decreases during the warm season (December–May) to its minimum in June. The same authors also show that the cool season is more favourable to baroclinic instability, which is a necessary condition to release energy from a larger APE reservoir during the cool season. Since we have seen earlier that the seasonality of the surface density SFs is weak, most of this APE seasonality is due to seasonal changes in the stratification (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>). The APE is also smaller in the NCAL region compared to the ECAL and SCAL regions, consistent with larger EKE in the latter regions as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b. The seasonal and spatial variations noticed on large mesoscale EKE captured by altimeters may also be valid for smaller scales as the APE follow similar seasonal and spatial variations in the range of 3–100 km.</p>
      <p id="d1e3581">In summary, the SFs applied on surface tracers are in accordance with submesoscale dynamics (e.g. mixed layer dynamics, frontogenesis) as slopes are close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the range of 3–100 km. In the ECAL region, the slopes of tracer SFs are also consistent with those of VSFs for the surface layer. Differences are noticed for scales larger than 100 km that are either due to a lack of quality data (NCAL and SCAL) or to a different dynamical regime (ECAL). Temperature and salinity SFs exhibit seasonal variations in phase opposition and are associated with seasonal modulation of constructive effects yielding to a weak seasonality in the density SFs. No clear dynamical link is established between the seasonal variations of temperature and salinity SFs and those of hydrographic profiles. Contrary to the density SFs, the APE SFs show seasonal variation mainly due to the seasonality of the stratification that could yield seasonal variation in surface EKE and VSFs. Spatial and seasonal variations of APE in the range of 3–100 km are consistent with larger-scale variation of EKE observed by altimetry.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusion and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e3604">In this study, we characterised the distribution of kinetic energy (KE) and tracer variance among the range of scales 3–100 km around New Caledonia using structure functions (SFs). We gathered data from different observing systems around New Caledonia, including SADCP, TSG and Argo, which made this study purely based on in situ observations. The analyses of SFs computed on these data showed that the dynamical regime at work in the 3–100 km range depends on depths, regions, seasons and scales. For each dependence type, we dedicate a section in which our findings are summarised and discussed. We eventually give some perspectives arising from this study.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Depth dependence</title>
      <?pagebreak page921?><p id="d1e3614">First, we found that different dynamical regimes are likely to be at work between the surface and the ocean interior in the regions south (SCAL) and east (ECAL) of New Caledonia as well as in the Vauban (VAUB) channel. Our results in those regions suggest the existence of a surface-intensified regime consistent with submesoscale dynamics involving frontogenesis and mixed layer instabilities. This hypothesis is supported by total velocity and tracer SFs having slopes close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) near the surface, with motions involving a dominant rotational component. However, the importance of rotational motions weakens with depth at the same time as the total VSF slopes flatten out to get closer to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) law. Because the average ratio of divergent and rotational components <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is close to unity at these depths, we concluded that stratified turbulence could be a regime at work in the interior layer (200–500 m). However, the shape of the total VSF at these depths is also close to the GM SF, which suggests together with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that the turbulent regime could consist in weak nonlinear interactions between IGWs.</p>
      <p id="d1e3705">As noticed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.84"/> in some regions of the North Pacific, we found that the turbulent regime is depth dependent with rotational motions decreasing in the ocean interior. What controls the depth dependence of the turbulent regime we found is unclear, but there are reasons to think that the depth of the mean currents might have an impact. Our study has not addressed the processes at work in the generation of submesoscale structures that could explain this surface-intensified regime, including mixed layer instabilities, strain-induced frontogenesis and the turbulent thermal wind balance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx57" id="paren.85"/>. Those instabilities extract their energy from the mesoscale gradients of buoyancy, which are substantial south and east of New Caledonia. In addition to observational datasets, a modelling approach to simulate submesoscale dynamics and IGWs around New Caledonia would be valuable to characterise in detail the submesoscale processes at work and investigate this depth dependence.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Regional dependence</title>
      <p id="d1e3722">Secondly, our analysis exhibited regional discrepancies between the SCAL and ECAL regions, which include the surface-intensified STCC current flowing eastward associated with substantial levels of EKE, and the NCAL region, which has weaker EKE but substantial internal tides. In particular, we did not find a clear surface-intensified regime in the NCAL region. Instead, we found that IGWs might already dominate near the surface with similar contributions of rotational and divergent motions across the submesoscale-to-mesoscale range as well as a slope close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We also found that the NCAL region has lower APE in this range of scales, consistent with a weaker EKE and weaker submesoscale motions associated with a large rotational component. In the interior layer (200–500 m), we also found that rotational motions still predominate at scales larger than 10 km in the VAUB region contrary to the others. At scales larger than 100 km, the tracer SFs in the ECAL region flatten out and depart from the other regions, suggesting a regime closer to interior quasi-geostrophic turbulence, whose stirring is nonlocally generated by large-scale eddies.</p>
      <p id="d1e3759">The location of hotspots of ME EKE and coherent internal tides shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> seems to be linked with the dynamical regimes occurring in the range of 3–100 km and supports the decomposition of the SF analyses into different regions. This regional link partly exists because coherent internal tides are associated with substantial non-coherent smaller IGWs and ME EKE provides APE for submesoscale structures. In some regions around New Caledonia, we also expect that some submesoscale structures can be generated in the lee of islands due to horizontal shear instabilities of the mean currents  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.86"/>:  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.87"/> found a substantial amount of eddies in the wake of the Vanuatu islands and north of New Caledonia where the lagoon ends using an eddy-tracking algorithm on altimetric sea level maps.</p>
      <p id="d1e3770">Because of those regional peculiarities, the turbulent regimes around New Caledonia characterised by SFs within the range of 3–100 km are substantially different from those occurring at midlatitude eddy-active regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.88"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. We did not find spectra transitioning from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> near the surface, characterising a transition between balanced and unbalanced flows. Instead,  we found slopes close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in three regions (ECAL, SCAL, VAUB), as in regions of weaker EKE such the North Equatorial Current region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.89"/> and the southern California Current system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.90"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3827">With the region north of New Caledonia (NCAL), we also provide the first observational evidence that the KE spectrum may already be close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for VSFs) in the range of 3–100 km, with a substantial contribution of divergent motions. In the Gulf of Mexico, VSFs were shown to have an inertial range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but at scales smaller than 1 km, and a slope close to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the range of 1–100 km <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.91"/>.  Thus, the NCAL region is likely to exhibit a turbulent regime involving IGWs at larger scales that would normally occur at smaller scales in other regions. This finding is consistent with the transition scale between balanced motions and waves found to be larger than 150–200 km by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.92"/> in the NCAL region.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>Seasonal dependence</title>
      <p id="d1e3910">Thirdly, we highlighted seasonal variations of the surface oceanic fine scales around New Caledonia. In the submesoscale-to-mesoscale range, temperature variance tends to increase during the cool season (June to November) compared to the warm season (December to May), whereas salinity variance decreases. However, only a weak seasonality is observed on the density variance, suggesting that constructive effects between temperature and salinity also seasonally vary, with the relative importance of temperature diminishing during the warm season. We did not find any links with the seasonal variations of the upper temperature and salinity profiles. Even if the density variance undergoes only weak seasonal variations, we found substantial variations of the APE at the surface with a larger reservoir during the cool season, mainly due to a less stratified water column during this season. Unfortunately, our dataset does not allow a separation of VSFs into different seasons, and we are unable to determine if the seasonality found on APE implies a seasonality on EKE and VSFs.</p>
      <?pagebreak page922?><p id="d1e3913">However, the seasonality of IGWs and SM motions has been shown to be out of phase near the surface, with SM motions being the most energetic in late winter/early spring, while IGWs are amplified during summer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.93"/>. Our estimate of the surface APE is maximum during the cool season, consistent with SM motions energised in late winter by mixed layer instabilities.  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.94"/> demonstrate that the amplification/dampening of IGWs at the surface compared to the interior is captured by a linear IGW model. Based on this model, they estimate global maps of the horizontal KE ratio between the surface and the interior: the ratio of mode 1 shows weak seasonality around New Caledonia, but higher modes (2, 3 and 4) have a higher ratio (i.e. amplification) during February. We would then expect that surface VSFs would exhibit seasonal variations due to a change in SM KE fed by a larger reservoir of APE during the cool season, as well as an amplification of IGW at the surface during the warm season.  In the interior, however, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.95"/> showed that balanced motions are not likely to undergo substantial seasonal cycles around New Caledonia, whereas unbalanced motions will be more important in the winter/spring period. We would then expect that interior VSFs around New Caledonia would exhibit seasonal variations in amplitude but would still exhibit similar slopes and divergent contributions, characteristics of dynamics driven by IGWs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <label>5.4</label><title>Scale dependence</title>
      <p id="d1e3934">Finally, we showed different scale dependence in the submesoscale-to-mesoscale range. Using the scale-dependent Rossby number, we found that 10 km is a cutoff scale under which the loss of balance is likely to occur. The Helmholtz decomposition performed on VSFs globally show that ageostrophic motions are non negligible at scales smaller than 10 km as motions start to have an important divergent component. The scale-dependent density ratio also showed that the dominant effect of temperature on density slightly tends to diminish at smaller scales.</p>
      <p id="d1e3937">The SF analysis performed here only characterised a continuum of scales without capturing the particular scales at which the coherent internal tides vibrate. Those have well-defined propagation and wavenumber, so that they can be captured by along-track altimetry over a long record. Around New Caledonia, the first baroclinic mode associated with the M2 internal tide is the most energetic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.96"/> and has a wavelength between 120 and 150 km <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.97"/>. Our SFs should not be impacted by the dominant wave  (i.e. M2 mode 1) around New Caledonia. Because SFs are averaged isotropically over bins of distance in our study, the signature of coherent internal tides is also likely to be weak. However, the exact impacts of coherent internal tides on structure functions have not been studied in the literature and should be quantified by performing sensitivity analyses with idealised models including turbulence and waves. Such sensitivity studies are beyond the scope of the current work and are left for future work.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS5">
  <label>5.5</label><title>Perspectives</title>
      <p id="d1e3954">Overall, our results suggest that the structure function analysis is a powerful tool that provides physically consistent results. Amongst the benefits of the SF analysis, the capacity to be directly computed on uneven samples is clearly an advantage compared to Fourier techniques. In order to provide more insights into the turbulent regimes at work, we tried to investigate the direction of the KE cascade using third-order structure functions as done in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.98"/>, but our dataset revealed to be too insufficient to compute accurate higher order statistics. We believe that more ADCP observations would solve this problem and provide better statistics in order to infer the direction of the energy cascades from SFs. A larger SADCP database would also allow disentangling seasonal and local variations in order to provide information on the seasonality of SFs and turbulent regimes.</p>
      <p id="d1e3960">The confidence levels of the divergent components can be substantial in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>, especially for the lower bound. Those confidence levels may be the result of the combination of data of heterogeneous quality coming from different devices and ships. The confidence intervals could be reduced by increasing the number of observations in the database. Another possibility is that one or more assumptions – isotropy, homogeneity, stationarity – used to compute the divergent and rotational components may fail. Checking the validity of those assumptions is not possible from unidimensional ADCP transects only and we will need to use outputs from a high-resolution ocean model including tides and submesoscale features as done by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.99"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3970">Because of the substantial imprint of IGWs around New Caledonia, small-scale sea level features, that will be captured by the next generation of altimeters, will require additional work to disentangle wave signatures and geostrophic velocities. With the forthcoming SWOT satellite, an unprecedented opportunity exists to combine small-scale sea level measurements from space and in situ observing systems to better understand the small-scale ocean dynamics in regions of substantial KE and IGW activity, such as the New Caledonia region. We also believe in the support of high-resolution modelling to select a judicious deployment of in situ observations around New Caledonia and to provide valuable information about the link between sea level dynamics and the water column at fine scales. High-resolution modelling around New Caledonia is to be performed in the near future and will also help to assess the working hypothesis for the use of structure functions.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3979">The code used to compute structure functions and analyse the results is made available on GitHub: <uri>https://github.com/serazing/serazin2019_scale-dependent</uri> (last access: 20 July 2020, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="altparen.100"/>).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3991">GS, SC, LG and FM were funded by Institut of Recherche and Développement (IRD). RM was funded by the University of PS (UPS), and MLD was funded by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) through the French TOSCA project. GS benefited from a IRD research grant for working on the SWOT project as well as financial support from the TOSCA/ROSES project. All authors contributed to a significant part to the presented scientific work.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3997">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e4003">The Ssalto/Duacs altimeter products were produced and distributed by the Copernicus Marine and Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS) (<uri>https://marine.copernicus.eu/</uri>, last access: 20 July 2020).
The authors acknowledge the Collect Localisation Satellite for the M2 internal tide maps estimated from altimetry by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.101"/>.
The authors are grateful to all who contributed to the acquisition, processing and distribution of SADCP data: the PIs of the cruises, the engineers and the crew. They wish to thank in particular the R/V <italic>Alis</italic> crew and Eric Firing, Julia Hummon Patrick Caldwell for maintaining the Joint Archive for Shipboard ADCP (JASADCP; <uri>https://uhslc.soest.hawaii.edu/sadcp/</uri>, last access: 20 July 2020). The ADCP dataset produced after quality control at the Laboraboire d'Études en Géophysique et Océanographie Spatiale is available on request.
Sea surface salinity data derived from voluntary observing ships were collected, validated, archived and made freely available by the French Sea Surface Salinity Observation Service (<uri>http://www.legos.obs-mip.fr/observations/sss/</uri>, last access: 20 July 2020).
Argo data were collected and made freely available by the International Argo Program and the national programmes that contribute to it  (<uri>https://argo.ucsd.edu/</uri>, last access: 20 July 2020, <uri>http://www.jcommops.org/board?t=argo</uri>, last access: 20 July 2020).  The Argo Program is part of the Global Ocean Observing System.</p><p id="d1e4027">The authors wish to acknowledge Dhruv Balwada for fruitful discussions on the use of structure functions with ocean observations and Les Houches School of Physics for hosting summer schools allowing such interactions between scientists.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4032">This paper was edited by Erik van Sebille and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Alory et al.(2015)</label><?label alory_french_2015?><mixed-citation>Alory, G., Delcroix, T., Téchiné, P., Diverrès, D., Varillon, D., Cravatte, S., Gouriou, Y., Grelet, J., Jacquin, S., Kestenare, E., Maes, C., Morrow, R., Perrier, J., Reverdin, G., and Roubaud, F.: The French contribution to the voluntary observing ships network of sea surface salinity, Deep-Sea Res. Pt I, 105, 1–18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2015.08.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2015.08.005</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Babiano et al.(1985)</label><?label babiano_structure_1985?><mixed-citation>Babiano, A., Basdevant, C., and Sadourny, R.: Structure Functions and  Dispersion Laws in Two-Dimensional Turbulence, J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 941–949,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042&lt;0941:SFADLI&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042&lt;0941:SFADLI&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Balwada et al.(2016)</label><?label balwada_scale_2016?><mixed-citation>Balwada, D., Lacasce, J., and Speer, K. G.: Scale Dependent Distribution of Kinetic Energy from Surface Drifters in the Gulf of Mexico: Scale Dep. Dist. of KE from Surface Drifters in the GOM, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 10856–10863, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069405" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL069405</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Batchelor(1959)</label><?label batchelor_small-scale_1959?><mixed-citation>Batchelor, G. K.: Small-scale variation of convected quantities like  temperature in turbulent fluid Part 1. General discussion and the case of small conductivity, J. Fluid Mech., 5, 113–133,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211205900009X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S002211205900009X</ext-link>, 1959.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bennett(1984)</label><?label bennett_relative_1984?><mixed-citation>Bennett, A. F.: Relative Dispersion: Local and Nonlocal Dynamics, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 1881–1886, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041&lt;1881:RDLAND&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041&lt;1881:RDLAND&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Boccaletti et al.(2007)</label><?label boccaletti_mixed_2007?><mixed-citation>Boccaletti, G., Ferrari, R., and Fox-Kemper, B.: Mixed Layer Instabilities and Restratification, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 37, 2228–2250,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO3101.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO3101.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Boyd(1992)</label><?label boyd_energy_1992?><mixed-citation>Boyd, J. P.: The Energy Spectrum of Fronts: Time Evolution of Shocks in Burgers Equation, J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 128–139, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049&lt;0128:TESOFT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049&lt;0128:TESOFT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{B\"{u}hler et~al.(2014)}}?><label>Bühler et al.(2014)</label><?label buhler_wavevortex_2014?><mixed-citation>Bühler, O., Callies, J., and Ferrari, R.: Wave–vortex decomposition of  one-dimensional ship-track data, J. Fluid Mech., 756, 1007–1026,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.488" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jfm.2014.488</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Callies and Ferrari(2013)</label><?label callies_interpreting_2013?><mixed-citation>Callies, J. and Ferrari, R.: Interpreting Energy and Tracer Spectra of  Upper-Ocean Turbulence in the Submesoscale Range (1–200 km), J. Phys. Oceanogr., 43, 2456–2474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-13-063.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-13-063.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Callies et al.(2015)</label><?label callies_seasonality_2015?><mixed-citation>Callies, J., Ferrari, R., Klymak, J. M., and Gula, J.: Seasonality in  submesoscale turbulence, Nat. Commun., 6, 6862, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7862" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms7862</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Cao et al.(2019)</label><?label cao_scale_2019?><mixed-citation>Cao, H., Jing, Z., Fox‐Kemper, B., Yan, T., and Qi, Y.: Scale Transition  From Geostrophic Motions to Internal Waves in the Northern  South China Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 124,  9364–9383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015575" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JC015575</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Charney(1971)</label><?label charney_geostrophic_1971?><mixed-citation>Charney, J. G.: Geostrophic Turbulence, J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 1087–1095, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028&lt;1087:GT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028&lt;1087:GT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Chereskin et al.(2019)</label><?label chereskin_characterizing_2019?><mixed-citation>Chereskin, T. K., Rocha, C. B., Gille, S. T., Menemenlis, D., and Passaro, M.: Characterizing the Transition From Balanced to Unbalanced Motions in the Southern California Current, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 124, 2088–2109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014583" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JC014583</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Cho and Lindborg(2001)</label><?label cho_horizontal_2001?><mixed-citation>Cho, J. Y. N. and Lindborg, E.: Horizontal velocity structure functions in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: 1. Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 10223–10232, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900814" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900814</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Cole and Rudnick(2012)</label><?label cole_spatial_2012?><mixed-citation>Cole, S. T. and Rudnick, D. L.: The spatial distribution and annual cycle of  upper ocean thermohaline structure, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C02027, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JC007033</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Cole et al.(2010)Cole, Rudnick, and Colosi</label><?label cole_seasonal_2010?><mixed-citation>Cole, S. T., Rudnick, D. L., and Colosi, J. A.: Seasonal evolution of  upper-ocean horizontal structure and the remnant mixed layer, J. Geophys. Res., 115, C04012, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005654" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JC005654</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page924?><ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Corrsin(1951)</label><?label corrsin_spectrum_1951?><mixed-citation>Corrsin, S.: On the Spectrum of Isotropic Temperature Fluctuations in an Isotropic Turbulence, J. Appl. Phys., 22, 469–473,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699986" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.1699986</ext-link>, 1951.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Cravatte et al.(2015)</label><?label cravatte_regional_2015?><mixed-citation>Cravatte, S., Kestenare, E., Eldin, G., Ganachaud, A., Lefèvre, J., Marin, F., Menkes, C., and Aucan, J.: Regional circulation around New Caledonia from two decades of observations, J. Marine Syst., 148, 249–271,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2015.03.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2015.03.004</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>de Lavergne et al.(2019)</label><?label de_lavergne_toward_2019?><mixed-citation>de Lavergne, C., Falahat, S., Madec, G., Roquet, F., Nycander, J., and Vic, C.: Toward global maps of internal tide energy sinks, Ocean Model., 137,  52–75, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.03.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.03.010</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Delcroix(1998)</label><?label delcroix_observed_1998?><mixed-citation>Delcroix, T.: Observed surface oceanic and atmospheric variability in the  tropical Pacific at seasonal and ENSO timescales: A tentative overview,  J. Geophys. Res., 103, 18611–18633, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC00814" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JC00814</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>d’Ovidio et al.(2019)</label><?label dovidio_frontiers_2019?><mixed-citation>d'Ovidio, F., Pascual, A., Wang, J., Doglioli, A. M., Jing, Z., Moreau, S.,
Grégori, G., Swart, S., Speich, S., Cyr, F., Legresy, B., Chao, Y., Fu, L.,
and Morrow, R.: Frontiers in Fine-Scale in situ Studies: Opportunities During the SWOT Fast Sampling Phase, Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00168" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2019.00168</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Fu and Ubelmann(2013)</label><?label fu_transition_2013?><mixed-citation>Fu, L.-L. and Ubelmann, C.: On the Transition from Profile Altimeter to  Swath Altimeter for Observing Global Ocean Surface Topography,  J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 31, 560–568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00109.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00109.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Garrett and Munk(1972)</label><?label garrett_space-time_1972?><mixed-citation>Garrett, C. and Munk, W.: Space-Time scales of internal waves, Geophysical  Fluid Dynamics, 3, 225–264, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/03091927208236082" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/03091927208236082</ext-link>, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{H\'{e}nin et~al.(1984)}}?><label>Hénin et al.(1984)</label><?label henin_circulation_1984?><mixed-citation>
Hénin, C., Guillerm, J.-M., and Chabert, L.: Circulation superficielle autour de la Nouvelle-Calédonie, Océanographie Tropicale, 19, 113–126, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Hodges and Rudnick(2006)</label><?label hodges_horizontal_2006?><mixed-citation>Hodges, B. A. and Rudnick, D. L.: Horizontal variability in chlorophyll  fluorescence and potential temperature, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 53, 1460–1482,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2006.06.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2006.06.006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Hoskins and Bretherton(1972)</label><?label hoskins_atmospheric_1972?><mixed-citation>Hoskins, B. J. and Bretherton, F. P.: Atmospheric Frontogenesis Models:  Mathematical Formulation and Solution, J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 11–37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029&lt;0011:AFMMFA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029&lt;0011:AFMMFA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,  1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Keppler et al.(2018)</label><?label keppler_observed_2018?><mixed-citation>Keppler, L., Cravatte, S., Chaigneau, A., Pegliasco, C., Gourdeau, L., and  Singh, A.: Observed Characteristics and Vertical Structure of  Mesoscale Eddies in the Southwest Tropical Pacific, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 2731–2756, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013712" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JC013712</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Klein et al.(1998)</label><?label klein_three-dimensional_1998?><mixed-citation>Klein, P., Treguier, A.-M., and Hua, B. L.: Three-dimensional stirring of  thermohaline fronts, J. Mar. Res., 56, 589–612,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1357/002224098765213595" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1357/002224098765213595</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Kolmogorov(1941)</label><?label kolmogorov_dissipation_1941?><mixed-citation>
Kolmogorov, A. N.: Dissipation of Energy in Locally Isotropic Turbulence, Akademiia Nauk SSSR Doklady, 32, 16–18, 1941.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Kolodziejczyk et al.(2015)</label><?label kolodziejczyk_observation_2015?><mixed-citation>Kolodziejczyk, N., Reverdin, G., Boutin, J., and Hernandez, O.: Observation of the surface horizontal thermohaline variability at mesoscale to submesoscale in the north-eastern subtropical Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120, 2588–2600, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010455" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JC010455</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Kraichnan(1967)</label><?label kraichnan_inertial_1967?><mixed-citation>Kraichnan, R. H.: Inertial Ranges in Two Dimensional Turbulence, Phys. Fluids, 10, 1417–1423, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1762301" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.1762301</ext-link>, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Lahaye et al.(2019)</label><?label lahaye_sea_2019?><mixed-citation>Lahaye, N., Gula, J., and Roullet, G.: Sea Surface Signature of Internal Tides, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 3880–3890, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081848" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL081848</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{L\'{e}vy et~al.(2012)}}?><label>Lévy et al.(2012)</label><?label levy_bringing_2012?><mixed-citation>Lévy, M., Ferrari, R., Franks, S. P. J., Martin, A. P., and Rivière, P.:  Bringing physics to life at the submesoscale, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L14602, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052756" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL052756</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Li and Lindborg(2018)</label><?label li_weakly_2018?><mixed-citation>Li, Q. and Lindborg, E.: Weakly or Strongly Nonlinear Mesoscale Dynamics Close to the Tropopause?, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 1215–1229, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0063.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-17-0063.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Lindborg(2006)</label><?label lindborg_energy_2006?><mixed-citation>Lindborg, E.: The energy cascade in a strongly stratified fluid, J. Fluid Mech., 550, 207–242, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112005008128" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0022112005008128</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Lindborg(2015)</label><?label lindborg_helmholtz_2015?><mixed-citation>Lindborg, E.: A Helmholtz decomposition of structure functions and spectra  calculated from aircraft data, J. Fluid Mech., 762, R4, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.685" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jfm.2014.685</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Lindborg and Brethouwer(2007)</label><?label lindborg_stratified_2007?><mixed-citation>Lindborg, E. and Brethouwer, G.: Stratified turbulence forced in rotational and divergent modes, J. Fluid Mech., 586, 83–108,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112007007082" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S0022112007007082</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Lindborg and Cho(2001)</label><?label lindborg_horizontal_2001?><mixed-citation>Lindborg, E. and Cho, J. Y. N.: Horizontal velocity structure functions in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: 2. Theoretical considerations,  J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 10233–10241, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900815" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900815</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>MacKinnon et al.(2017)</label><?label mackinnon_climate_2017?><mixed-citation>MacKinnon, J. A., Zhao, Z., Whalen, C. B., Waterhouse, A. F., Trossman, D. S., Sun, O. M., St. Laurent, L. C., Simmons, H. L., Polzin, K., Pinkel, R., Pickering, A., Norton, N. J., Nash, J. D., Musgrave, R., Merchant, L. M.,  Melet, A. V., Mater, B., Legg, S., Large, W. G., Kunze, E., Klymak, J. M.,  Jochum, M., Jayne, S. R., Hallberg, R. W., Griffies, S. M., Diggs, S.,Danabasoglu, G., Chassignet, E. P., Buijsman, M. C., Bryan, F. O., Briegleb,  B. P., Barna, A., Arbic, B. K., Ansong, J. K., and Alford, M. H.: Climate Process Team on Internal Wave–Driven Ocean Mixing, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 2429–2454, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0030.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0030.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Mahadevan(2016)</label><?label mahadevan_impact_2016?><mixed-citation>Mahadevan, A.: The Impact of Submesoscale Physics on Primary Productivity of Plankton, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 8, 161–184,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010814-015912" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-marine-010814-015912</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Marchesiello et al.(2010)</label><?label marchesiello_coastal_2010?><mixed-citation>Marchesiello, P., Lefèvre, J., Vega, A., Couvelard, X., and Menkes, C.:  Coastal upwelling, circulation and heat balance around New Caledonia's  barrier reef, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 61, 432–448,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.06.043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.06.043</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>McCaffrey et al.(2015)</label><?label mccaffrey_estimates_2015?><mixed-citation>McCaffrey, K., Fox-Kemper, B., and Forget, G.: Estimates of Ocean Macroturbulence: Structure Function and Spectral Slope from Argo  Profiling Floats, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 45, 1773–1793,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-14-0023.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-14-0023.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>McWilliams(2016)</label><?label mcwilliams_submesoscale_2016?><mixed-citation>McWilliams, J. C.: Submesoscale currents in the ocean, P. Roy. Soc. A-Math. Phy., 472, 20160117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspa.2016.0117</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Munk(1981)</label><?label munk_internal_1981?><mixed-citation>
Munk, W.: Internal waves and small-scale processes, in: Evolution of Physical Oceanography, edited by: Warren, B. A. and Wunsch, C., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 264–290, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Obukhov(1949)</label><?label obukhov_structure_1949?><mixed-citation>
Obukhov, A. M.: Structure of the temperature field in turbulent flow, Izv.  AN SSSR, Ser. Geograf. Geofiz., 13, 58–69, 1949.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Qiu and Chen(2004)</label><?label qiu_seasonal_2004?><mixed-citation>Qiu, B. and Chen, S.: Seasonal Modulations in the Eddy Field of the South Pacific Ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 34, 1515–1527,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2004)034&lt;1515:SMITEF&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(2004)034&lt;1515:SMITEF&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page925?><ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Qiu et al.(2009)</label><?label qiu_source_2009?><mixed-citation>Qiu, B., Chen, S., and Kessler, W. S.: Source of the 70-Day Mesoscale  Eddy Variability in the Coral Sea and the North Fiji Basin,  J. Phys. Oceanogr., 39, 404–420, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JPO3988.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2008JPO3988.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Qiu et al.(2017)</label><?label qiu_submesoscale_2017?><mixed-citation>Qiu, B., Nakano, T., Chen, S., and Klein, P.: Submesoscale transition from  geostrophic flows to internal waves in the northwestern Pacific upper  ocean, Nat. Commun., 8, 14055, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14055" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms14055</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Qiu et al.(2018)</label><?label qiu_seasonality_2018?><mixed-citation>Qiu, B., Chen, S., Klein, P., Wang, J., Torres, H., Fu, L.-L., and Menemenlis, D.: Seasonality in Transition Scale from Balanced to Unbalanced Motions in the World Ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 48, 591–605, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0169.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-17-0169.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Ray and Zaron(2015)</label><?label ray_M2_2015?><mixed-citation>Ray, R. D. and Zaron, E. D.: M2 Internal Tides and Their Observed  Wavenumber Spectra from Satellite Altimetry, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 46, 3–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-15-0065.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-15-0065.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Rocha et al.(2015)</label><?label rocha_mesoscale_2015?><mixed-citation>Rocha, C. B., Chereskin, T. K., Gille, S. T., and Menemenlis, D.: Mesoscale to Submesoscale Wavenumber Spectra in Drake Passage, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 46, 601–620, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-15-0087.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-15-0087.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Rocha et al.(2016)</label><?label rocha_seasonality_2016?><mixed-citation>Rocha, C. B., Gille, S. T., Chereskin, T. K., and Menemenlis, D.: Seasonality  of submesoscale dynamics in the Kuroshio Extension, Geophys. Res.  Lett., 43, 11304–11311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL071349</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Roemmich and Gilson(2009)</label><?label roemmich_20042008_2009?><mixed-citation>Roemmich, D. and Gilson, J.: The 2004–2008 mean and annual cycle of  temperature, salinity, and steric height in the global ocean from the Argo Program, Prog. Oceanogr., 82, 81–100, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.03.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2009.03.004</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Salmon(1998)</label><?label salmon_lectures_1998?><mixed-citation>
Salmon, R.: Lectures on Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, OUP USA, Oxford University Press, New York, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{S\'{e}razin(2020)}?><label>Sérazin(2020)</label><?label Serazin2020?><mixed-citation>Sérazin, G.: Scale-dependent analysis of in situ observations in the mesoscale to submesoscale range around New Caledonia, GitHub, available at: <uri>https://github.com/serazing/serazin2019_scale-dependent</uri> (last access: 20 July 2020).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Shcherbina et al.(2014)</label><?label shcherbina_latmix_2014?><mixed-citation>Shcherbina, A. Y., Sundermeyer, M. A., Kunze, E., D'Asaro, E., Badin, G.,  Birch, D., Brunner-Suzuki, A.-M. E. G., Callies, J., Kuebel Cervantes, B. T.,  Claret, M., Concannon, B., Early, J., Ferrari, R., Goodman, L., Harcourt,  R. R., Klymak, J. M., Lee, C. M., Lelong, M.-P., Levine, M. D., Lien, R.-C.,  Mahadevan, A., McWilliams, J. C., Molemaker, M. J., Mukherjee, S., Nash,  J. D., Özgökmen, T., Pierce, S. D., Ramachandran, S., Samelson, R. M., Sanford, T. B., Shearman, R. K., Skyllingstad, E. D., Smith, K. S., Tandon, A., Taylor, J. R., Terray, E. A., Thomas, L. N., and Ledwell, J. R.: The LatMix Summer Campaign: Submesoscale Stirring in the Upper Ocean, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 1257–1279, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00015.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00015.1</ext-link>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Srinivasan et al.(2017)</label><?label srinivasan_topographic_2017?><mixed-citation>Srinivasan, K., McWilliams, J. C., Renault, L., Hristova, H. G., Molemaker, J., and Kessler, W. S.: Topographic and Mixed Layer Submesoscale Currents in the Near-Surface Southwestern Tropical Pacific, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 47, 1221–1242, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-16-0216.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-16-0216.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Srinivasan et al.(2019)</label><?label srinivasan_submesoscale_2019?><mixed-citation>Srinivasan, K., McWilliams, J. C., Molemaker, M. J., and Barkan, R.:  Submesoscale Vortical Wakes in the Lee of Topography, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 49, 1949–1971, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-18-0042.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-18-0042.1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Su et al.(2018)</label><?label su_ocean_2018?><mixed-citation>Su, Z., Wang, J., Klein, P., Thompson, A. F., and Menemenlis, D.: Ocean  submesoscales as a key component of the global heat budget, Nat.
Commun., 9, 775, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02983-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-018-02983-w</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Vallis(2006)</label><?label vallis_atmospheric_2006?><mixed-citation>
Vallis, G. K.: Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Vic et al.(2019)</label><?label vic_deep-ocean_2019?><mixed-citation>Vic, C., Naveira Garabato, A. C., Green, J. A. M., Waterhouse, A. F., Zhao, Z., Melet, A., de Lavergne, C., Buijsman, M. C., and Stephenson, G. R.:  Deep-ocean mixing driven by small-scale internal tides, Nat. Commun., 10, 2099, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10149-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-019-10149-5</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Webb(1964)</label><?label webb_ratio_1964?><mixed-citation>Webb, E. K.: Ratio of spectrum and structure-function constants in the inertial subrange, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 90, 344–346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709038520" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.49709038520</ext-link>, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Zaron(2017)</label><?label zaron_mapping_2017?><mixed-citation>Zaron, E. D.: Mapping the nonstationary internal tide with satellite altimetry, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 539–554,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012487" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JC012487</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Zhao(2017)</label><?label zhao_global_2017?><mixed-citation>Zhao, Z.: The Global Mode-1 S2 Internal Tide, J. Geophys.  Res.-Oceans, 122, 8794–8812, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JC013112</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Zhao(2018)</label><?label zhao_global_2018?><mixed-citation>Zhao, Z.: The Global Mode-2 M2 Internal Tide, J. Geophys.   Res.-Oceans, 123, 7725–7746, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014475" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JC014475</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Scale-dependent analysis of in situ observations in the mesoscale to submesoscale range around New Caledonia</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Small-scale ocean dynamics around New Caledonia (22°&thinsp;S) in the southwest Pacific Ocean occur in regions with substantial mesoscale eddies, complex bathymetry, complex intertwined currents, islands and strong internal tides. Using second-order structure functions applied to observational acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) and thermosalinograph (TSG) datasets, these small-scale dynamics are characterised in the range of scales of 3–100&thinsp;km in order to determine the turbulent regime at work. A Helmholtz decomposition is used to analyse the contribution of rotational and divergent motions. A surface-intensified regime is shown to be at work south and east of New Caledonia, involving substantial rotational motions such as submesoscale structures generated by mixed layer instabilities and frontogenesis. This regime is, however, absent north of New Caledonia, where mesoscale eddies are weaker and surface available potential energy is smaller at small scales. North of New Caledonia and below 200&thinsp;m, in the regions south and east of New Caledonia, the dynamical regime at work could be explained by stratified turbulence as divergent and rotational motions have similar contribution, but weakly nonlinear interaction between inertia–gravity waves is also possible as structure functions get close to the empirical spectrum model for inertia–gravity waves. Seasonal variations of the available potential energy reservoir, associated with a change in the vertical profile rather than in horizontal density variance, suggest that submesoscale motions would also seasonally vary around New Caledonia. Overall, a loss of geostrophic balance is likely to occur at scales smaller than 10&thinsp;km, where the contribution of divergent motions become significant.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Alory et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Alory, G., Delcroix, T., Téchiné, P., Diverrès, D., Varillon, D., Cravatte, S., Gouriou, Y., Grelet, J., Jacquin, S., Kestenare, E., Maes, C., Morrow, R., Perrier, J., Reverdin, G., and Roubaud, F.: The French contribution to the voluntary observing ships network of sea surface salinity, Deep-Sea Res. Pt I, 105, 1–18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2015.08.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2015.08.005</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Babiano et al.(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Babiano, A., Basdevant, C., and Sadourny, R.: Structure Functions and  Dispersion Laws in Two-Dimensional Turbulence, J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 941–949,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042&lt;0941:SFADLI&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1985)042&lt;0941:SFADLI&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Balwada et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Balwada, D., Lacasce, J., and Speer, K. G.: Scale Dependent Distribution of Kinetic Energy from Surface Drifters in the Gulf of Mexico: Scale Dep. Dist. of KE from Surface Drifters in the GOM, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 10856–10863, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069405" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069405</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Batchelor(1959)</label><mixed-citation>
Batchelor, G. K.: Small-scale variation of convected quantities like  temperature in turbulent fluid Part 1. General discussion and the case of small conductivity, J. Fluid Mech., 5, 113–133,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211205900009X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211205900009X</a>, 1959.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bennett(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Bennett, A. F.: Relative Dispersion: Local and Nonlocal Dynamics, J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 1881–1886, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041&lt;1881:RDLAND&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1984)041&lt;1881:RDLAND&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Boccaletti et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Boccaletti, G., Ferrari, R., and Fox-Kemper, B.: Mixed Layer Instabilities and Restratification, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 37, 2228–2250,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO3101.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO3101.1</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Boyd(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
Boyd, J. P.: The Energy Spectrum of Fronts: Time Evolution of Shocks in Burgers Equation, J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 128–139, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049&lt;0128:TESOFT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049&lt;0128:TESOFT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Bühler et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Bühler, O., Callies, J., and Ferrari, R.: Wave–vortex decomposition of  one-dimensional ship-track data, J. Fluid Mech., 756, 1007–1026,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.488" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.488</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Callies and Ferrari(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Callies, J. and Ferrari, R.: Interpreting Energy and Tracer Spectra of  Upper-Ocean Turbulence in the Submesoscale Range (1–200&thinsp;km), J. Phys. Oceanogr., 43, 2456–2474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-13-063.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-13-063.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Callies et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Callies, J., Ferrari, R., Klymak, J. M., and Gula, J.: Seasonality in  submesoscale turbulence, Nat. Commun., 6, 6862, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7862" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7862</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Cao et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, H., Jing, Z., Fox‐Kemper, B., Yan, T., and Qi, Y.: Scale Transition  From Geostrophic Motions to Internal Waves in the Northern  South China Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 124,  9364–9383, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015575" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015575</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Charney(1971)</label><mixed-citation>
Charney, J. G.: Geostrophic Turbulence, J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 1087–1095, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028&lt;1087:GT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028&lt;1087:GT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1971.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Chereskin et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Chereskin, T. K., Rocha, C. B., Gille, S. T., Menemenlis, D., and Passaro, M.: Characterizing the Transition From Balanced to Unbalanced Motions in the Southern California Current, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 124, 2088–2109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014583" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014583</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Cho and Lindborg(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Cho, J. Y. N. and Lindborg, E.: Horizontal velocity structure functions in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: 1. Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 10223–10232, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900814" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900814</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Cole and Rudnick(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, S. T. and Rudnick, D. L.: The spatial distribution and annual cycle of  upper ocean thermohaline structure, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C02027, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007033</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Cole et al.(2010)Cole, Rudnick, and Colosi</label><mixed-citation>
Cole, S. T., Rudnick, D. L., and Colosi, J. A.: Seasonal evolution of  upper-ocean horizontal structure and the remnant mixed layer, J. Geophys. Res., 115, C04012, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005654" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JC005654</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Corrsin(1951)</label><mixed-citation>
Corrsin, S.: On the Spectrum of Isotropic Temperature Fluctuations in an Isotropic Turbulence, J. Appl. Phys., 22, 469–473,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699986" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699986</a>, 1951.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Cravatte et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Cravatte, S., Kestenare, E., Eldin, G., Ganachaud, A., Lefèvre, J., Marin, F., Menkes, C., and Aucan, J.: Regional circulation around New Caledonia from two decades of observations, J. Marine Syst., 148, 249–271,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2015.03.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2015.03.004</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>de Lavergne et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
de Lavergne, C., Falahat, S., Madec, G., Roquet, F., Nycander, J., and Vic, C.: Toward global maps of internal tide energy sinks, Ocean Model., 137,  52–75, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.03.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2019.03.010</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Delcroix(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Delcroix, T.: Observed surface oceanic and atmospheric variability in the  tropical Pacific at seasonal and ENSO timescales: A tentative overview,  J. Geophys. Res., 103, 18611–18633, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC00814" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98JC00814</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>d’Ovidio et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
d'Ovidio, F., Pascual, A., Wang, J., Doglioli, A. M., Jing, Z., Moreau, S.,
Grégori, G., Swart, S., Speich, S., Cyr, F., Legresy, B., Chao, Y., Fu, L.,
and Morrow, R.: Frontiers in Fine-Scale in situ Studies: Opportunities During the SWOT Fast Sampling Phase, Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00168" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00168</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Fu and Ubelmann(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Fu, L.-L. and Ubelmann, C.: On the Transition from Profile Altimeter to  Swath Altimeter for Observing Global Ocean Surface Topography,  J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 31, 560–568, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00109.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00109.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Garrett and Munk(1972)</label><mixed-citation>
Garrett, C. and Munk, W.: Space-Time scales of internal waves, Geophysical  Fluid Dynamics, 3, 225–264, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/03091927208236082" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/03091927208236082</a>, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Hénin et al.(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Hénin, C., Guillerm, J.-M., and Chabert, L.: Circulation superficielle autour de la Nouvelle-Calédonie, Océanographie Tropicale, 19, 113–126, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Hodges and Rudnick(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Hodges, B. A. and Rudnick, D. L.: Horizontal variability in chlorophyll  fluorescence and potential temperature, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 53, 1460–1482,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2006.06.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2006.06.006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Hoskins and Bretherton(1972)</label><mixed-citation>
Hoskins, B. J. and Bretherton, F. P.: Atmospheric Frontogenesis Models:  Mathematical Formulation and Solution, J. Atmos. Sci., 29, 11–37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029&lt;0011:AFMMFA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1972)029&lt;0011:AFMMFA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,  1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Keppler et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Keppler, L., Cravatte, S., Chaigneau, A., Pegliasco, C., Gourdeau, L., and  Singh, A.: Observed Characteristics and Vertical Structure of  Mesoscale Eddies in the Southwest Tropical Pacific, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 123, 2731–2756, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013712" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013712</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Klein et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Klein, P., Treguier, A.-M., and Hua, B. L.: Three-dimensional stirring of  thermohaline fronts, J. Mar. Res., 56, 589–612,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1357/002224098765213595" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1357/002224098765213595</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Kolmogorov(1941)</label><mixed-citation>
Kolmogorov, A. N.: Dissipation of Energy in Locally Isotropic Turbulence, Akademiia Nauk SSSR Doklady, 32, 16–18, 1941.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Kolodziejczyk et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Kolodziejczyk, N., Reverdin, G., Boutin, J., and Hernandez, O.: Observation of the surface horizontal thermohaline variability at mesoscale to submesoscale in the north-eastern subtropical Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 120, 2588–2600, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010455" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010455</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Kraichnan(1967)</label><mixed-citation>
Kraichnan, R. H.: Inertial Ranges in Two Dimensional Turbulence, Phys. Fluids, 10, 1417–1423, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1762301" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1762301</a>, 1967.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Lahaye et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Lahaye, N., Gula, J., and Roullet, G.: Sea Surface Signature of Internal Tides, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 3880–3890, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081848" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081848</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Lévy et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Lévy, M., Ferrari, R., Franks, S. P. J., Martin, A. P., and Rivière, P.:  Bringing physics to life at the submesoscale, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L14602, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052756" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL052756</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Li and Lindborg(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Q. and Lindborg, E.: Weakly or Strongly Nonlinear Mesoscale Dynamics Close to the Tropopause?, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 1215–1229, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0063.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-17-0063.1</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Lindborg(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Lindborg, E.: The energy cascade in a strongly stratified fluid, J. Fluid Mech., 550, 207–242, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112005008128" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112005008128</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Lindborg(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Lindborg, E.: A Helmholtz decomposition of structure functions and spectra  calculated from aircraft data, J. Fluid Mech., 762, R4, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.685" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.685</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Lindborg and Brethouwer(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Lindborg, E. and Brethouwer, G.: Stratified turbulence forced in rotational and divergent modes, J. Fluid Mech., 586, 83–108,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112007007082" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112007007082</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Lindborg and Cho(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Lindborg, E. and Cho, J. Y. N.: Horizontal velocity structure functions in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere: 2. Theoretical considerations,  J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 10233–10241, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900815" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900815</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>MacKinnon et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
MacKinnon, J. A., Zhao, Z., Whalen, C. B., Waterhouse, A. F., Trossman, D. S., Sun, O. M., St. Laurent, L. C., Simmons, H. L., Polzin, K., Pinkel, R., Pickering, A., Norton, N. J., Nash, J. D., Musgrave, R., Merchant, L. M.,  Melet, A. V., Mater, B., Legg, S., Large, W. G., Kunze, E., Klymak, J. M.,  Jochum, M., Jayne, S. R., Hallberg, R. W., Griffies, S. M., Diggs, S.,Danabasoglu, G., Chassignet, E. P., Buijsman, M. C., Bryan, F. O., Briegleb,  B. P., Barna, A., Arbic, B. K., Ansong, J. K., and Alford, M. H.: Climate Process Team on Internal Wave–Driven Ocean Mixing, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 2429–2454, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0030.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0030.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Mahadevan(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Mahadevan, A.: The Impact of Submesoscale Physics on Primary Productivity of Plankton, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 8, 161–184,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010814-015912" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010814-015912</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Marchesiello et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Marchesiello, P., Lefèvre, J., Vega, A., Couvelard, X., and Menkes, C.:  Coastal upwelling, circulation and heat balance around New Caledonia's  barrier reef, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 61, 432–448,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.06.043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.06.043</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>McCaffrey et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
McCaffrey, K., Fox-Kemper, B., and Forget, G.: Estimates of Ocean Macroturbulence: Structure Function and Spectral Slope from Argo  Profiling Floats, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 45, 1773–1793,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-14-0023.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-14-0023.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>McWilliams(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
McWilliams, J. C.: Submesoscale currents in the ocean, P. Roy. Soc. A-Math. Phy., 472, 20160117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0117</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Munk(1981)</label><mixed-citation>
Munk, W.: Internal waves and small-scale processes, in: Evolution of Physical Oceanography, edited by: Warren, B. A. and Wunsch, C., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 264–290, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Obukhov(1949)</label><mixed-citation>
Obukhov, A. M.: Structure of the temperature field in turbulent flow, Izv.  AN SSSR, Ser. Geograf. Geofiz., 13, 58–69, 1949.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Qiu and Chen(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Qiu, B. and Chen, S.: Seasonal Modulations in the Eddy Field of the South Pacific Ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 34, 1515–1527,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2004)034&lt;1515:SMITEF&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2004)034&lt;1515:SMITEF&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Qiu et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Qiu, B., Chen, S., and Kessler, W. S.: Source of the 70-Day Mesoscale  Eddy Variability in the Coral Sea and the North Fiji Basin,  J. Phys. Oceanogr., 39, 404–420, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JPO3988.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JPO3988.1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Qiu et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Qiu, B., Nakano, T., Chen, S., and Klein, P.: Submesoscale transition from  geostrophic flows to internal waves in the northwestern Pacific upper  ocean, Nat. Commun., 8, 14055, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14055" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14055</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Qiu et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Qiu, B., Chen, S., Klein, P., Wang, J., Torres, H., Fu, L.-L., and Menemenlis, D.: Seasonality in Transition Scale from Balanced to Unbalanced Motions in the World Ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 48, 591–605, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0169.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0169.1</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Ray and Zaron(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Ray, R. D. and Zaron, E. D.: M2 Internal Tides and Their Observed  Wavenumber Spectra from Satellite Altimetry, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 46, 3–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-15-0065.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-15-0065.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Rocha et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Rocha, C. B., Chereskin, T. K., Gille, S. T., and Menemenlis, D.: Mesoscale to Submesoscale Wavenumber Spectra in Drake Passage, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 46, 601–620, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-15-0087.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-15-0087.1</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Rocha et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Rocha, C. B., Gille, S. T., Chereskin, T. K., and Menemenlis, D.: Seasonality  of submesoscale dynamics in the Kuroshio Extension, Geophys. Res.  Lett., 43, 11304–11311, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071349" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071349</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Roemmich and Gilson(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Roemmich, D. and Gilson, J.: The 2004–2008 mean and annual cycle of  temperature, salinity, and steric height in the global ocean from the Argo Program, Prog. Oceanogr., 82, 81–100, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.03.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.03.004</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Salmon(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Salmon, R.: Lectures on Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, OUP USA, Oxford University Press, New York, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Sérazin(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Sérazin, G.: Scale-dependent analysis of in situ observations in the mesoscale to submesoscale range around New Caledonia, GitHub, available at: <a href="https://github.com/serazing/serazin2019_scale-dependent" target="_blank"/> (last access: 20 July 2020).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Shcherbina et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Shcherbina, A. Y., Sundermeyer, M. A., Kunze, E., D'Asaro, E., Badin, G.,  Birch, D., Brunner-Suzuki, A.-M. E. G., Callies, J., Kuebel Cervantes, B. T.,  Claret, M., Concannon, B., Early, J., Ferrari, R., Goodman, L., Harcourt,  R. R., Klymak, J. M., Lee, C. M., Lelong, M.-P., Levine, M. D., Lien, R.-C.,  Mahadevan, A., McWilliams, J. C., Molemaker, M. J., Mukherjee, S., Nash,  J. D., Özgökmen, T., Pierce, S. D., Ramachandran, S., Samelson, R. M., Sanford, T. B., Shearman, R. K., Skyllingstad, E. D., Smith, K. S., Tandon, A., Taylor, J. R., Terray, E. A., Thomas, L. N., and Ledwell, J. R.: The LatMix Summer Campaign: Submesoscale Stirring in the Upper Ocean, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 1257–1279, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00015.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00015.1</a>, 2014.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Srinivasan et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Srinivasan, K., McWilliams, J. C., Renault, L., Hristova, H. G., Molemaker, J., and Kessler, W. S.: Topographic and Mixed Layer Submesoscale Currents in the Near-Surface Southwestern Tropical Pacific, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 47, 1221–1242, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-16-0216.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-16-0216.1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Srinivasan et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Srinivasan, K., McWilliams, J. C., Molemaker, M. J., and Barkan, R.:  Submesoscale Vortical Wakes in the Lee of Topography, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 49, 1949–1971, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-18-0042.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-18-0042.1</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Su et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Su, Z., Wang, J., Klein, P., Thompson, A. F., and Menemenlis, D.: Ocean  submesoscales as a key component of the global heat budget, Nat.
Commun., 9, 775, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02983-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02983-w</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Vallis(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Vallis, G. K.: Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Vic et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Vic, C., Naveira Garabato, A. C., Green, J. A. M., Waterhouse, A. F., Zhao, Z., Melet, A., de Lavergne, C., Buijsman, M. C., and Stephenson, G. R.:  Deep-ocean mixing driven by small-scale internal tides, Nat. Commun., 10, 2099, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10149-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10149-5</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Webb(1964)</label><mixed-citation>
Webb, E. K.: Ratio of spectrum and structure-function constants in the inertial subrange, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 90, 344–346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709038520" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709038520</a>, 1964.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Zaron(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Zaron, E. D.: Mapping the nonstationary internal tide with satellite altimetry, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 539–554,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012487" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012487</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Zhao(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Z.: The Global Mode-1 S2 Internal Tide, J. Geophys.  Res.-Oceans, 122, 8794–8812, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013112</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Zhao(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, Z.: The Global Mode-2 M2 Internal Tide, J. Geophys.   Res.-Oceans, 123, 7725–7746, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014475" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014475</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
