<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">OS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Ocean Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">OS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ocean Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1812-0792</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/os-13-577-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Differences between 1999 and 2010 across the Falkland Plateau: fronts and
water masses</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Differences between 1999 and 2010 across the Falkland Plateau}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M.~D.~P\'{e}rez-Hern\'{a}ndez et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff5">
          <name><surname>Pérez-Hernández</surname><given-names>M. Dolores</given-names></name>
          <email>mdolores.perez@whoi.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7293-9584</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hernández-Guerra</surname><given-names>Alonso</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4883-8123</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Comas-Rodríguez</surname><given-names>Isis</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Benítez-Barrios</surname><given-names>Verónica M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Fraile-Nuez</surname><given-names>Eugenio</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Pelegrí</surname><given-names>Josep L.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Naveira Garabato</surname><given-names>Alberto C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Instituto de Oceanografía y Cambio Global (IOCAG), Universidad de
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC),<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Las Palmas, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Centro Oceanográfico de Canarias, Instituto Español de
Oceanografía, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institut de Ciències del Mar, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones
Científicas, Barcelona, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton,
UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Physical Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic
Institution, Woods Hole, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">M. Dolores Pérez-Hernández (mdolores.perez@whoi.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>7</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>577</fpage><lpage>587</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>17</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>13</day><month>December</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>7</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://os.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://os.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Decadal
differences in the Falkland Plateau are studied from the two full-depth
hydrographic data collected during the ALBATROSS (April 1999) and
MOC-Austral (February 2010) cruises. Differences in the upper 100 dbar are
due to changes in the seasonal thermocline, as the ALBATROSS cruise took
place in the austral fall and the MOC-Austral cruise in summer. The
intermediate water masses seem to be very sensitive to the wind conditions
existing in their formation area, showing cooling and freshening for the
decade as a consequence of a higher Antarctic Intermediate Water (AAIW)
contribution and of a decrease in the Subantarctic Mode Water (SAMW) stratum.
The deeper layers do not exhibit any significant change in the water mass
properties. The Subantarctic Front (SAF) in 1999 is observed at
52.2–54.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W with a relative mass transport of 32.6 Sv. In
contrast, the SAF gets wider in 2010, stretching from 51.1 to
57.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W (the Falkland Islands), and weakening to 17.9 Sv. Changes
in the SAF can be linked with the westerly winds and mainly affect the
northward flow of Subantarctic Surface Water (SASW), SAMW and AAIW/Antarctic
Surface Water (AASW). The Polar Front (PF) carries 24.9 Sv in 1999
(49.8–44.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), while in 2010 (49.9–49.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) it narrows
and strengthens to 37.3 Sv.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Hydrographic stations across the Falkland Plateau
carried out during the ALBATROSS (1999, red station numbers) and MOC-Austral
(2010, black station numbers) cruises. <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diagram for
both cruises. Red solid lines represent the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (26.90,
27.20, 27.60 and 28.00 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) defining the different water masses in
the region.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/577/2017/os-13-577-2017-f01.pdf"/>

    </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) flows eastwards around the
Antarctic continent, transporting roughly between 100 and 173 Sv
(1 Sv <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
hereafter Sv will be the unit used) (Orsi et al., 1995; Cunningham et al.,
2003; Donohue et al., 2016). Along its path, it connects the Atlantic,
Pacific and Indian basins, exchanging heat and freshwater among other
properties. Although convergence of net flux estimates has been achieved on
basin scales (Ganachaud and Wunsch, 2003), the ACC flow into the Atlantic
Ocean is critical to establish the magnitude and pathways of the Southern
Ocean contribution to the deep global ocean ventilation.</p>
      <p>Peterson and Whitworth III (1989) suggested that the Subantarctic Front (SAF)
and the Polar Front (PF), where the major velocity bands of the ACC occur,
turn northwestward across the Falkland Plateau to the west of the Maurice
Ewing Bank, along the Patagonian continental slope. This was supported by
Peterson (1992), who estimated the large contribution of the ACC to the
Falkland Current (60–70 Sv), revealing the importance of the overflow of
southern waters to the South Atlantic boundary circulation. Peterson and
Whitworth III (1989) located the SAF near 53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, as corroborated by
Arhan et al. (2002), at a location where the ocean depth is 2000 m. Several
studies have later examined the path of the PF around the Maurice Ewing Bank
(Trathan et al., 2000) and its branching around 49–50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W
(Arhan et al., 2002), with a possible meandering of the front according to
Naveira Garabato et al. (2002).</p>
      <p>The first hydrographic cruise along the Falkland Plateau was carried out in
1999. The ALBATROSS (Antarctic Large-scale Box Analysis and the Role of the
Scotia Sea) cruise explored the ACC through the Drake Passage and the Scotia
Sea (Fig. 1). The data of this cruise have been used to estimate relative
transport, water masses, fluxes and mixing across the plateau (Naveira
Garabato et al., 2003) and to provide a detailed explanation of the deep
waters in the Scotia Sea (Naveira Garabato et al., 2002). Later on, this
section was compared with hydrographic cruises carried out north and south of
the Falkland Plateau to achieve a better knowledge of this area (Arhan et
al., 2002; Smith et al., 2010). However, it is not until 2010 that this
section is repeated.</p>
      <p>In this study, the water masses, relative geostrophic velocities and
transports across an almost zonal hydrographic section carried out in 2010
along the Falkland Plateau are evaluated. These data, together with the
ALBATROSS cruise, are the only high-resolution hydrographic data available in
the region. Thus, results from the 2010 cruise are compared with those
obtained from the 1999 cruise in the same area (Naveira Garabato et al.,
2003), with the objective of assessing possible relative transport and water
mass differences between the two surveys. For changes in the relative
transport, the position of the fronts and the season in which each cruise
took place will be considered. Changes in water masses are decomposed into changes in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isobaric surfaces and results from the Bindoff and
McDougall (1994) model.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data and methods</title>
      <p>The MOC-Austral cruise was carried out in February 2010 onboard the BIO
<italic>Hespérides</italic>. As shown in Fig. 1a, 27 full-depth
conductivity, temperature and depth (CTD) stations were
occupied across the Falkland Plateau, tracking along the casts previously
conducted in between 41 and 57<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W at the nominal latitude of
51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S during the ALBATROSS cruise in April 1999 (Naveira Garabato
et al., 2003). With a spatial separation of 30 to 50 km, temperature and
salinity profiles were obtained using a SeaBird 911<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CTD with dual
conductivity and temperature sensors. The CTD was sent to SeaBird for
calibration before the cruise. The temperature sensor has an accuracy of
0.001 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The conductivity sensors were calibrated on board with
bottle sample salinities. To that end, water samples were analyzed on a
Guildline AUTOSAL 8400B salinometer with accuracy better than 0.002 for
single samples (salinity is expressed in the Practical Salinity Scale,
UNESCO, 1981).</p>
      <p>Relative geostrophic velocities and mass transports are estimated for both
the ALBATROS and MOC-Austral cruises using the sea bottom as the level of no
motion. The water column is divided into 18 neutral density layers following
the work of Naveira Garabato et al. (2003) (see Table 1). Weddell Sea Deep
Water (WSDW) is not found along the plateau; thus, its density layers are not
considered here.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>SAF, PF and net geostrophic mass transport (Sv) per cruise and
water mass. The last row shows the net transport, while the last column
indicates the transport difference between cruises.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">ALBATROSS (1999) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7" align="center" colsep="1">MOC-Austral (2010) </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col10" align="center">Difference (2010–1999) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SAF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Net</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">SAF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">PF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Net</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">SAF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">PF</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Net</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SASW  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 26.90</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SAMW  27.00 &lt; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 27.20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AAIW/AASW 27.30 &lt; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 27.60</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">15.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">16.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UCDW   27.70 &lt; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> &lt; 28.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">8.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LCDW  28.05 &lt; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.0</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Net</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">32.6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">24.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">38.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">17.9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">37.3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">29.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">12.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>A volumetric potential temperature–salinity diagram for
the <bold>(a)</bold> ALBATROSS and <bold>(b)</bold> MOC-Austral cruises. Red solid
lines represent the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (26.90, 27.20, 27.60 and
28.00 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) defining the different water masses in the region. Dot
size and color indicate the logarithm of counts.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/577/2017/os-13-577-2017-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Bindoff and McDougall (1994) describe a model to evaluate the temperature
and salinity variations in the water column. This model relates the
temperature and salinity in both pressure and density changes through the
following equation:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M40" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="." close="|"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="|" open="."><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="." close="|"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        which shows that for a given property (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, temperature or
salinity), the variations along isobaric levels <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="|" open="."><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be described as
the sum of changes along isoneutral surfaces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="." close="|"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and changes due to vertical displacements of the density
surfaces, referred to as heaving <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="|" open="."><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ψ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This allows the
comparison between the isobaric changes and the sum of the two decomposed
components, which represent the variations of the water masses (warming and
freshening) and the heaving. To apply this methodology, temperature and
salinity are interpolated onto a grid with a pressure interval of 20 dbar
(from 10 to 3500 dbar) and the following neutral density (kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values: from 26 to 27.6 each 0.02, from 27.7 to 28 each 0.01 and from
28.005 to 28.5 each 0.005. This vector is selected to properly represent the
different structures found in the water column.</p>
      <p>In addition, sea surface height (SSH) was downloaded from AVISO
(<uri>http://www.aviso.oceanobs.com/</uri>, Dibarboure et al., 2015). Data between 10 and 20 February 2010
are used for the analysis of the MOC-Austral cruise results. Data of February
and April from 1993 to 2016 are used to estimate the average seasonal
geostrophic transport in each month.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Water masses</title>
      <p>Water masses in the study region are labeled following Naveira Garabato et al. (2003).
The isoneutrals 26.90, 27.20, 27.60 and 28.00 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (red solid
lines in Fig. 1b) divide the water column into Subantarctic Surface Water
(SASW), Subantarctic Mode Water (SAMW), Antarctic Intermediate Water (AAIW)
mixed with Antarctic Surface Water (AASW), Upper Circumpolar Deep Water
(UCDW) and Lower Circumpolar Deep Water (LCDW), respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Geostrophic velocity (cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, positive northward) relative to
the bottom for <bold>(a)</bold> the ALBATROSS cruise and <bold>(b)</bold> the
MOC-Austral cruise. Black dashed lines mark 0 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> velocities. Thick
black lines stand for the representative isoneutrals (26.90, 27.20, 27.60 and
28.00 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) defining the water masses in the region. Station
numbering and the front (SAF and PF) location are displayed on the top
axis.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/577/2017/os-13-577-2017-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure 2 shows that, in both cruises, the Circumpolar Deep Water (CDW) is the
most homogenous water mass. The UCDW in the ALBATROSS cruise presents a wider
temperature range and it is less homogeneous than in the MOC-Austral cruise.
Figure 2 also shows that the strata of AAIW <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AASW and SAMW are quite
different between cruises. The AAIW <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AASW stratum of the MOC-Austral
cruise presents a minimum that consists of temperatures below 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
and salinities around 34. This minimum indicates that the contribution of
AAIW is higher in 2010 than in 1999. In contrast, in the same stratum, the
ALBATROSS cruise shows a thicker layer of AASW. The SASW in 1999 reaches
higher salinities and temperatures than in the MOC-Austral cruise (this can
be better observed in Fig. 1b, grey dots). It is also worth mentioning the
existing difference between the SAWM strata of both cruises, as the one of
the ALBATROSS cruise has a wider range of salinities than the one of
MOC-Austral (Fig. 2). The upper layers are less comparable as the cruises
took place in different seasons, which implies different
precipitation/evaporation and winds that will directly affect the SASW
stratum.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Fronts</title>
      <p>In Fig. 3, the prominent slope of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surfaces together with the
intensified relative velocities point out the presence of the SAF and PF near
their historically reported locations (Orsi et al., 1995). In 1999, a
northward-flowing jet accompanies the SAF, extending the front's influence
from the surface down to approximately 1500 m between 52.2 and
54.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W (Fig. 3a, stations 160 to 165). In contrast, the SAF is
displaced to the west in 2010, extending from the Falkland shore
(57.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) to 51.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W (stations 5 to 17), and the horizontal
density gradient and associated relative geostrophic velocities are weaker
(Fig. 3b). Regarding the PF, its quasi-barotropic presence and effect on the
water column are most noticeable in 2010 (Fig. 3b, stations 20 and 21), when
it intensifies, displaying the strongest flow to the north around
49.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W. Figure 3a shows how this front is weaker in 1999, when it
extends approximately between 44.4 and 49.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and no intense
jets are triggered by its presence (stations 146 to 156).</p>
      <p>It can be observed how these fronts are revealed by
the sloping isoneutrals, suffering significant
changes between the two oceanographic cruises. Therefore, it is important to
determine which variations in potential temperature and salinity are due to
water mass changes and which are caused by the displacement of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surfaces.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{The $\theta$/S isobaric changes}?><title>The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>/S isobaric changes</title>
      <p>Figure 4 reveals that in the decade, the waters shallower than 50 dbar
(roughly the SASW stratum) exhibit a significant increase in temperature and
salinity, being 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and 0.12, respectively (Fig. 4a–d). This surface increase is probably caused by the fact that the area
was sampled in very different seasons: while the MOC-Austral cruise took
place in the austral summer, the ALBATROSS cruise was carried out during the
austral fall.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Vertical sections of
differences in <bold>(a)</bold> potential temperature and <bold>(c)</bold> salinity
in isobaric levels, for the 1999 and 2010 cruise. The lines superimposed over the vertical sections (grey
lines for the 1999 section and black lines for the 2010 section) stand for
the isoneutrals defining the different water masses in the region (26.90,
27.20, 27.60 and 28.00 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). MOC-Austral station numbering and the
front (SAF (grey 1999, black 2010) and PF)
locations are displayed on the top axis. Side panels show the zonally
averaged differences in temperature <bold>(b)</bold> and salinity <bold>(d)</bold>,
respectively (solid black lines), together with their 95 % confidence
interval based on a Student's <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-test (dashed grey lines).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/577/2017/os-13-577-2017-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In the waters immediately beneath (from 50 to 500 dbar), the intermediate
strata of SAMW and AAIW <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AASW present a decrease in temperature of 0.8
and 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, respectively (Fig. 4a and b). In contrast, while
salinity for the AAIW <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AASW stratum also decreases by 0.01, the salinity
of the SAMW increases by 0.02 (Fig. 4c and d). In these intermediate strata,
at roughly the location of the fronts (between stations 5–17 and 20–21), a
remarkable decrease in temperature can be seen (Fig. 4a). In between
stations 9–12, where the SAF stands, the UCDW exhibits a remarkable increase
in salinity. This increase gets compensated in the average with the decrease
observed throughout the stratum. The same is observed in the area of the PF,
where an increase in salinity is registered at the UCDW and AAIW/AASW strata
(Fig. 4c).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Isobaric changes from 1999 to 2010 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, black line)
decomposed into changes along neutral surfaces (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
blue line) and changes due to the vertical displacement of isoneutrals
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, red line) for <bold>(a)</bold> potential temperature
and <bold>(b)</bold> salinity. The grey line shows the sum of both components.
The lower panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows the average profile of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each
cruise together with the densities that divide the water column into the
different water masses (26.90, 27.20, 27.60 and 28.00 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, red
lines) and the link in between points of equal pressure (dashed blue lines).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/577/2017/os-13-577-2017-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The UCDW and LCDW do not show any significant changes in temperature. The
UCDW increases by 0.01 in salinity, while the LDCW does not show any
significant difference in salinity (Fig. 4c and d).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Results of applying the Bindoff and McDougal (1994) analysis</title>
      <p>The temperature and
salinity isobaric changes, their decomposition and the sum of the two
components are plotted in Fig. 5a and b, respectively. Except for certain
depth ranges, the sum of the components (grey line) compares reasonably well
with the isobaric change (black line, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating
that the decomposition has been successfully performed. The few discrepancies
observed will be analyzed at the end of the section.</p>
      <p>The surface and intermediate temperature and salinity variations are affected
by both mechanisms: changes along neutral surfaces (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, blue lines) and changes due to vertical displacement of the
isoneutrals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, red lines) (Fig. 5a and b). In
the SASW stratum (pressure &lt; 100 dbar) an increase of 0.7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
C in temperature and 0.1 in salinity per decade is observed (Fig. 5a and b,
respectively). This increase can also be discerned in Fig. 5c. These
increases come together with a temperature-driven vertical displacement of
the isoneutrals (Fig. 5a, red line). As the cruises took place in different
seasons, the most plausible explanation for this shoaling is the different
depths of the seasonal thermocline, being shallower in summer (2010) than in
fall (1999).</p>
      <p>In contrast to the upper layer, the SAMW and AAIW/AASW strata present a
decadal decrease in temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and salinity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.07)
between 100 and 500 dbar (Fig. 5a and b). These changes can also be
observed in the average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-diagram for the AAIW/AASW (Fig. 5c). The
SAMW and AAIW/ASW strata occupy the same depth range, but the AAIW/ASW water
mass spans over a higher area (Fig. 3). Hence, the decomposition shown in
Fig. 5a and b mainly shows the behavior of the AAIW/AASW stratum and,
therefore, it does not match with the increase in salinity observed in
Fig. 5c for SAMW. In Fig. 5c the lines linking points of equal pressure for
the SAMW and AAIW/AASW strata are not parallel to the isopycnals, indicating,
as well, displacement of the isoneutrals' surfaces. This displacement is a
deepening of the isoneutrals, mainly driven by the salinity. At the level of
the UCDW no changes are observed (Fig. 5a–c). In contrast, the LCDW stratum shows a deepening of the
isoneutrals driven by both temperature and salinity, although no changes
along neutral surfaces are observed (Fig. 5a–c).</p>
      <p>As seen in Fig. 5, the sum of the components compares reasonably well to the
isobaric changes. However, a careful inspection reveals some discrepancies,
which take place between 52 and 57<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and around 49.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W.
These are the approximate locations of the SAF and PF. These gradients cause the
vertical displacement of more than 200 dbar for some isoneutrals,
invalidating at these specific locations the linear expansion used to derive
the proposed decomposition model, as was also found in the Gulf Stream by
Arbic and Owens (2001). Thus, in Fig. 6 a sensitivity analysis is carried out
by using the model of Bindoff and McDougall (1994) without the stations
involved in the fronts, taking into account only the stations 18 (157) and 28
to 31 (145 to 142) for the 2010 (1999) survey. For the surface SASW water
mass, the same behavior is found with or without fronts: an increase in
temperature and salinity, though slightly higher in the decomposition done
without the fronts (0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and 0.15 vs. 0.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and 0.1),
and a temperature-driven shoaling of the isopycnals. Likewise, in the range
100–500 dbar, where the SAMW and AAIW/AASW strata appear, the decomposition
shows the same pattern: a slightly smaller decrease in temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and salinity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.04) again accompanied by a
salinity-driven deepening of the isopycnals.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Comparison between the isobaric changes from 1999 to 2010 carried
out with the whole dataset of each year (<bold>a</bold>, <bold>b</bold>, same as
Fig. 5) and without the stations where the fronts are located <bold>(c, d)</bold>. Isobaric changes from 1999 to 2010 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, black line) decomposed
into changes along neutral surfaces (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, blue line)
and changes due to the vertical displacement of isoneutrals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, red line) for temperature <bold>(a, c)</bold> and salinity <bold>(b, d)</bold>. The grey line shows the sum of both components.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/577/2017/os-13-577-2017-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In contrast, from 500 dbar to the bottom two differences appear between both
decompositions. The first one occurs between 500 and 2000 dbar: in both
decompositions a slight increase in temperature and salinity is observed, but
in the one carried out without the fronts it appears with a salinity-driven
shoaling of the isopycnals. This depth range is mainly occupied by the UCDW
stratum. The second significant change between both decompositions appears at
the bottom of the profile, in the domain of the LCDW. As the stations east of
MOC-Austral station 28 (ALBATROSS station 148) are shallower than 2400 dbar,
this decomposition mainly shows the changes at station 18. This station is located
between both fronts, and shows a temperature-driven deepening of the
isopycnals. The result in this stratum can be neglected, as one station
cannot be considered statistically significant to provide representative
results.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Relative geostrophic mass transport changes</title>
      <p>Some significant differences are observed in the relative mass transport
estimates for 1999 and 2010 across the hydrographic line along the Falkland
Plateau (Table 1). The accumulated transports show the important role played
by the SAF and PF in the relative mass transport across the section during
both realizations (Fig. 7). During the MOC-Austral cruise the SAF-associated
jet is displaced westward and weakens by 14.7 Sv as compared with the
ALBATROSS observations (Fig. 4 and Table 1). This affects the relative mass
transport of all strata but LCDW. In contrast, the location of the PF remains
unchanged between both cruises, but it strengthens up to 37.3 Sv during the
MOC-Austral cruise (vs. the 24.9 Sv registered in the ALBATROSS survey),
affecting the relative mass transports of all water strata. In 2010,
immediately east of the PF, at 47.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, a countercurrent appears
carrying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.8 Sv to the south. Figure 8 shows the average SSH for the 2010
MOC-Austral cruise with the aim of understanding the source of this
counter-flow. In this figure, the PF flows to the north around station 20 and
partially diverts southward at station 23. This meandering of the PF has
already been reported in previous studies (Naveira Garabato et al., 2002).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>West-to-east accumulated relative geostrophic mass transport,
computed across the ALBATROSS and MOC-Austral hydrographic sections. Station
numbering and the front (SAF and PF) locations are displayed on the top
axis. Note the different vertical scales. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/577/2017/os-13-577-2017-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>AVISO SSH for the MOC-Austral cruise. Isolines have a separation of
5 cm.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/577/2017/os-13-577-2017-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The relative net mass transport during the MOC-Austral cruise is 9.2 Sv
weaker than in the ALBATROSS cruise as an outcome of a more intense SAF in
1999. SASW, AAIW/AASW and UCDW present lower values in 2010 than in 1999, the
surface and intermediate strata being the ones with the highest decadal
transport differences (Fig. 7 and Table 1). This is presumably due to a
weaker SAF in 2010 (17.9 Sv) than in 1999 (32.6 Sv) (Table 1). The SAF does
not have a contribution from the LDCW stratum due to the shallow bathymetry.
Thus, the only northward contribution to this stratum is done by the PF,
which is stronger in 2010 than in 1999 from the SAMW stratum to the bottom.
The total mass transports of the PF are 37.3 Sv in 2010 vs. 24.9 Sv in
1999.</p>
      <p>Figure 9 exhibits the vertical structure of the calculated mass transport in
the different layers, which define each water mass. The geostrophic mass
transports in the ALBATROSS (1999) and MOC-Austral (2010) hydrographic
cruises behave likewise across the water column. The mass transports from the
surface to the UCDW stratum are affected by a noticeable northward net mass
transport decrease of 10.6 Sv from 1999 to 2010. In contrast, the LCDW
exhibits an increase of 1.4 Sv in the northward flow in 1999 and 2010.</p>
      <p>To put all the estimated mass transports into context, the monthly 1993–2016
averaged geostrophic velocities from AVISO are interpolated to the station
pairs of both cruises and integrated by using the stations' distance and the
average depth of the SASW stratum (50 m). This is shown in Fig. 10, where
the 1993–2016 average of all Februaries (Aprils) is contrasted with the
estimated relative transport of the MOC-Austral (ALBATROSS) upper stratum. It
is seen that there is no significant climatological difference between the
estimations of both months. Hence, the positions and transports (expressed as
mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> standard deviation) of the SAF and PF in the AVISO-derived
transports are 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 Sv at the longitudinal range
52.97–56.96<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.7 Sv at
47.49–51.34<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, respectively. The SAF AVISO estimated transport is
approximately the average between the SASW transports of ALBATROSS (3.2 Sv)
and MOC-Austral (1.9 Sv). The PF observed in the AVISO data covers a wider
range of longitudes than the ones of the hydrographic surveys. Its transport
is slightly smaller than for the ALBATROSS cruise (2.0 Sv) and
non-significantly different from MOC-Austral (1.6 Sv) at the SASW stratum
(Table 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Relative geostrophic mass transport per layer across the ALBATROSS
and MOC-Austral sections.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/577/2017/os-13-577-2017-f09.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>West-to-east accumulated relative geostrophic mass transport from
AVISO averaged from 1993 to 2016, together with their standard deviations:
April (grey solid line) and February (black solid line). For this
calculation, the depth of 50 m has been considered to compute the mass
transport that corresponds to the SASW stratum. Dashed lines are the
west-to-east accumulated relative geostrophic mass transports shown in Fig. 7
for the SASW for ALBATROSS (grey) and MOC-Austral (black) carried out in
April and February, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/577/2017/os-13-577-2017-f10.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Maps of NCEP-NCAR <bold>(a)</bold> winter (July–September) mean wind
stress in Pa (arrows; color indicates magnitude) for the time period
1998–2010. <bold>(b)</bold> Winter wind stress anomaly (Pa) for the year 1998.
<bold>(c)</bold> Same as <bold>(b)</bold> but for 2009. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/577/2017/os-13-577-2017-f11.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussion and conclusions</title>
      <p>The decadal differences in the Falkland Plateau are studied from full-depth
hydrographic data collected during the ALBATROSS (April 1999) and
MOC-Austral (February 2010) cruises. Water mass changes are explored in
terms of changes along neutral surfaces and changes due to vertical
displacements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surfaces, applying the model proposed by
Bindoff and McDougall (1994). Variability in the SAF and PF location and mass
transport is inferred from relative geostrophic velocities estimated by using
the sea bottom as the level of no motion.</p>
      <p>The SASW stratum presents a wider range of salinities and temperatures in
1999 than in 2010, as shown in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diagram. In spite of this, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isobaric changes show an increase in surface temperatures and
salinities matching the Bindoff and McDougall (1994) model's result for
changes along neutral surfaces. The model also exhibits shoaling of the
isopycnals. The most plausible source of these differences is the fact that
the hydrographic cruises took place in different seasons (ALBATROSS in
austral fall and MOC-Austral in austral summer). Hence, the seasonal
thermocline has probably changed its depth due to the different seasonal
heating and precipitation. The scarce in situ observations in the area do not
allow any further conclusions.</p>
      <p>SAMW expands over a larger depth range and presents a wider range of
salinities in 1999 than in 2010 (Figs. 2 and 4). In contrast, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
diagram and isobaric changes for the AAIW/AASW stratum show a decrease in
temperature and salinity in 2010 when the AAIW/AASW occupies a higher depth
range (Figs. 2 and 4). As both Bindoff and McDougall (1994) model estimations
(with and without frontal zones) agree in that the changes in the
intermediate strata are due to the displacement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> surfaces,
some changes are likely to have occurred between 1999 and 2010 in the
Falkland Plateau. The Bindoff and McDougall (1994) model reveals a deepening
of the isoneutrals at these levels, where the AAIW/AASW stratum occupies a
higher depth range than SAMW. An explanation for changes in those strata can
be found in Naveira Garabato et al. (2009). Figure 11a shows the mean wind
stress of the winters in the period 1998–2010. This figure is analogous to
Fig. 11a of Naveira Garabato et al. (2009). In the climatological mean a
continuous wind stress magnitude spreads west from South America (Fig. 11a).
Figure 11b and c exhibits the previous winter anomalies to the ALBATROSS and
MOC-Austral cruises, respectively. These anomalies look very different
between themselves. Figure 11b shows a large eastward (positive) wind stress
anomaly in the South Pacific. Naveira Garabato et al. (2009) suggest that
this structure causes a shift in the SAMW formation area. This matches with
the changes observed in Figs. 2 and 4, where the SAMW stratum area is
reduced. It also agrees with the isobaric changes reported, a decrease in
temperature of 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and an increase in salinity of 0.02 from 1999
to 2010.</p>
      <p>Naveira Garabato et al. (2009) also reported that the 1998 wind stress
anomaly pattern shown in Fig. 11b generates a shutdown of the AAIW formation.
Due to this, a minimum of temperatures (&lt; 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and
salinities (ca. 34) can be observed only for the MOC-Austral cruise in
Figs. 1b and 2b. The shutdown of the AAIW formation in 1998 is responsible
for the observed changes from 1999 to 2010 at this stratum. Across the
decade, the AAIW/AASW stratum increases the spanning area at intermediate
layers and suffers a decrease of 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in temperature and of 0.07
in salinity, which is accompanied by a deepening of the isoneutrals.
Wind-driven changes in the ACC isobaric surfaces were also observed in
Böning et al. (2008), where a deepening of the isopycnals of 27.2 and
27.4 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is described. The reported decrease of 0.07 in salinity
agrees with the decadal trend of the ACC at 300–500 dbar observed in
Böning et al. (2008), shown in their Fig. 4. In contrast, they find an
increase in temperature at the same layer, probably due to the contribution
of other intermediate waters to the ACC.</p>
      <p>The SAF and PF undergo some displacements and variations in intensity between
1999 and 2010. The SAF in 1999 is observed at 52.2–54.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W with a
relative mass transport of 32.6 Sv and, while it is wider in 2010, reaching
the Falkland Islands, it weakens to roughly half of the transport (17.9 Sv).
The SAF is the main path for the northward flow of SASW, SAMW and AAIW/AASW
into the Atlantic Basin. The PF also contributes to this northward flow,
being important for the UCDW and LCDW. The PF in 1999 is located in the
longitudinal range 49.8–44.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W carrying 24.9 Sv, while in 2010 it
narrows, centering on 49.9–49<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and strengthening to 37.3 Sv. The
PF in 2010 carries the highest relative northward transport of the study
area, but nearly 8 Sv of it recirculate back southward, as seen in the SSH
image. This meandering of the PF was also observed in Naveira Garabato et
al. (2002). The average of the AVISO climatological seasonal transport is
non-significantly different between February and April. Thus, the observed
changes in transport are due to interannual variability.</p>
      <p>The abrupt decrease in the SAF to almost half of its transport between both
decades has it source in the different wind patterns observed in Fig. 11 and
described in Naveira Garabato et al. (2009). The changes in these westerly
winds that circle Antarctica are driven by the Southern Annular Mode (SAM).
Combes and Matano (2014)
analyze the 1990 to 2012 trend of the SAM
and its relation to the Falkland Current (which is nourished from the SAF). In their study they report a
decrease in the Drake Passage transports and in the Falkland Current after
1999–2000 as a consequence of a weakening of the westerly winds.</p>
      <p>To conclude, a seasonal change in the thermocline is observed in the surface
layer. Changes in the westerly winds driven by the increasing trend of the
SAM (Combes and Matano, 2014; Naveira
Garabato et al., 2009) have an important effect on the water masses and
transports observable in the Falkland Plateau. The intermediate water masses
of the study area seem to be very sensitive to the wind conditions existing
in their formation area. Hence, in 2010 an increase (decrease) in the
AAIW/AASW (SAMW) stratum is observed together with a cooling, freshening and
deepening of the isopycnals at this level. The CDW layers do not exhibit any
significant change in the water mass properties, being the most homogenous
water mass. However, the LCDW exhibited a temperature- and salinity-driven
deepening of the isopycnals from 1999 to 2010. The net transport is 9.2 Sv
weaker in 2010 than in 1999 and is mainly explained by a decrease in the
transport of the SAF. Fronts change their width and strength between cruises,
the SAF/PF being wider/thinner in 2010 and weaker/stronger than in 1999.
Changes in the water masses, position and transport contribution of the SAF
and PF to the north directly affect the Brazil–Malvinas Confluence Zone,
which moves to the south when the SAF weakens (Combes and Matano,
2014). This strong frontal zone is
critical for the Southern Hemisphere meridional overturning, is where the
deep western boundary separates from the Argentinian basin, and is a
high-energy area that contributes to the active water mass transformation
(Mason et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>The data are already being published at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17882/50171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17882/50171</ext-link>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study has been performed thanks to MOC2 (CTM2008-06438-C02-02/MAR) and
Sevacan (CTM2013-48695), financed by the Spanish Government. The ALBATROSS
cruise was funded by a Natural Environment Research Council
grant (GR3/11654). This work was completed while
M. Dolores Pérez-Hernández was a PhD student in the IOCAG Doctoral
Programme in Oceanography and Global Change. The authors would like to thank
David Sosa, Rayco Alvarado and all the scientific team and crew onboard the
BIO <italic>Hespérides</italic> for their hard work at sea during the MOC-Austral
cruise. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: Mario
Hoppema<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Arbic, B. K. and Owens, W. B.: Climatic warming of Atlantic
intermediate waters, J. Climate, 14, 4091–4108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014&lt;4091:CWOAIW&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014&lt;4091:CWOAIW&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Arhan, M., Naveira Garabato, A. C., Heywood, K. J., and Stevens, D. P.: The
Antarctic Circumpolar Current between the Falkland Islands and South
Georgia, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32, 1914–1931, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;1914:TACCBT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;1914:TACCBT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bindoff, N. L. and McDougall, T. J.: Diagnosing climate change and ocean
ventilation using hydrographic data, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 24, 1137–1152,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1994)024&lt;1137:DCCAOV&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1994)024&lt;1137:DCCAOV&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Böning, C. W., Dispert, A., Visbeck, M., Rintoul, S. R., and Schwarzopf,
U.: The response of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current to recent climate
change, Nat. Geosci., 1, 864–869, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo362" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo362</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Combes, V. and Matano, R. P.: Trends in the Brazil/Malvinas Confluence
region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 8971–8977, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062523" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL062523</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Cunningham, S. A., Alderson, S. G., King, B. A., and Brandon, M. A.: Transport
variability of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current in Drake Passage, J.
Geosphys. Res.-Oceans., 108, 8084, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001147" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JC001147</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Dibarboure, G.,  Lauret, O., and Mertz, F.: SSALTO/DUACS User Handbook: (M)SLA
and (M)ADT near-real time and delayed time products, AVISO Rep. CLS-DOS- NT
06-034, Issue 4.4, SALP-MU-P-EA-21065-CLS, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Donohue, K. A.,  Tracey, K. L.,  Watts, D. R.,  Chidichimo, M. P., and
Chereskin, T. K.: Mean Antarctic Circumpolar Current transport measured in
Drake Passage, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 11760–11767,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070319" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL070319</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Ganachaud, A. and Wunsch, C.: Large-scale ocean heat and freshwater
transports during the World Ocean Circulation Experiment, J. Climate, 16,
696–705, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016&lt;0696:LSOHAF&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016&lt;0696:LSOHAF&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Mason, E., Pascual, A., Gaube, P., Ruiz, S., Pelegrí, J. L., and
Delepoulle, A.: Subregional characterization of mesoscale eddies across the
Brazil-Malvinas Confluence, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 3329–3357,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012611" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JC012611</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Naveira Garabato, A. C., Heywood, K. J., and Stevens, D. P.: Modification and
pathways of Southern Ocean Deep Waters in the Scotia Sea, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
49, 681–705, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(01)00071-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0967-0637(01)00071-1</ext-link>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Naveira Garabato, A. C., Stevens, D. P., and Heywood, K. J.: Water mass
conversion, dluxes, and mixing in the Scotia Sea diagnosed by an inverse
model, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 33, 2565–2587, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033&lt;2565:WMCFAM&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033&lt;2565:WMCFAM&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Naveira Garabato, A. C., Jullion, L., Stevens, D. P., Heywood, K. J., and King,
B. A.: Variability of Subantartic Mode Water and Antarctic Intermediate Water
in the Drake  Passage during the late-twentieth and early-twenty-first
centuries, J. Climate, 22, 3661–3688, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2621.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JCLI2621.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Orsi, A. H., Whitworth III, T., and Nowlin Jr., W. D.: On the meridional
extent and fronts of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
42, 641–673, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(95)00021-W" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0967-0637(95)00021-W</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Peterson, R. G.: The boundary currents in the western Argentine Basin,
Deep-Sea Res., 39, 623–644, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(92)90092-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0198-0149(92)90092-8</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Peterson, R. G. and Whitworth III, T.: The subantarctic and polar fronts in
relation to deep water masses through the southwestern Atlantic, J. Geophys.
Res., 94, 10817–10838, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC094iC08p10817" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JC094iC08p10817</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Smith, I. J., Stevens, D. P., Heywood, K. J., and Meredith, M. P.: The flow
of the  Antarctic Circumploar Current over the North Scotia Ridge, Deep-Sea
Res. Pt. I, 56, 14–28, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2009.10.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2009.10.010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Trathan, P. N., Brandon, M. A., Murphy, E. J., and Thorpe, S. E.: Transport and
structure within the Antarctic Circumpolar Current to the north of South
Georgia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 1727–1730, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL011131" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999GL011131</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
UNESCO: The practical salinity Scale 1978 and the international equation of
state of seawater 1980, Techn. Pap. mar. sci, 36, 25 pp.,
1981.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Differences between 1999 and 2010 across the Falkland Plateau: fronts and water masses</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Decadal
differences in the Falkland Plateau are studied from the two full-depth
hydrographic data collected during the ALBATROSS (April 1999) and
MOC-Austral (February 2010) cruises. Differences in the upper 100 dbar are
due to changes in the seasonal thermocline, as the ALBATROSS cruise took
place in the austral fall and the MOC-Austral cruise in summer. The
intermediate water masses seem to be very sensitive to the wind conditions
existing in their formation area, showing cooling and freshening for the
decade as a consequence of a higher Antarctic Intermediate Water (AAIW)
contribution and of a decrease in the Subantarctic Mode Water (SAMW) stratum.
The deeper layers do not exhibit any significant change in the water mass
properties. The Subantarctic Front (SAF) in 1999 is observed at
52.2–54.8° W with a relative mass transport of 32.6 Sv. In
contrast, the SAF gets wider in 2010, stretching from 51.1 to
57.2° W (the Falkland Islands), and weakening to 17.9 Sv. Changes
in the SAF can be linked with the westerly winds and mainly affect the
northward flow of Subantarctic Surface Water (SASW), SAMW and AAIW/Antarctic
Surface Water (AASW). The Polar Front (PF) carries 24.9 Sv in 1999
(49.8–44.4° W), while in 2010 (49.9–49.2° W) it narrows
and strengthens to 37.3 Sv.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Arbic, B. K. and Owens, W. B.: Climatic warming of Atlantic
intermediate waters, J. Climate, 14, 4091–4108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014&lt;4091:CWOAIW&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014&lt;4091:CWOAIW&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Arhan, M., Naveira Garabato, A. C., Heywood, K. J., and Stevens, D. P.: The
Antarctic Circumpolar Current between the Falkland Islands and South
Georgia, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32, 1914–1931, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;1914:TACCBT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;1914:TACCBT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bindoff, N. L. and McDougall, T. J.: Diagnosing climate change and ocean
ventilation using hydrographic data, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 24, 1137–1152,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1994)024&lt;1137:DCCAOV&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1994)024&lt;1137:DCCAOV&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Böning, C. W., Dispert, A., Visbeck, M., Rintoul, S. R., and Schwarzopf,
U.: The response of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current to recent climate
change, Nat. Geosci., 1, 864–869, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo362" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo362</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Combes, V. and Matano, R. P.: Trends in the Brazil/Malvinas Confluence
region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 8971–8977, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062523" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062523</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cunningham, S. A., Alderson, S. G., King, B. A., and Brandon, M. A.: Transport
variability of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current in Drake Passage, J.
Geosphys. Res.-Oceans., 108, 8084, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001147" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JC001147</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Dibarboure, G.,  Lauret, O., and Mertz, F.: SSALTO/DUACS User Handbook: (M)SLA
and (M)ADT near-real time and delayed time products, AVISO Rep. CLS-DOS- NT
06-034, Issue 4.4, SALP-MU-P-EA-21065-CLS, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Donohue, K. A.,  Tracey, K. L.,  Watts, D. R.,  Chidichimo, M. P., and
Chereskin, T. K.: Mean Antarctic Circumpolar Current transport measured in
Drake Passage, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 11760–11767,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070319" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070319</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Ganachaud, A. and Wunsch, C.: Large-scale ocean heat and freshwater
transports during the World Ocean Circulation Experiment, J. Climate, 16,
696–705, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016&lt;0696:LSOHAF&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016&lt;0696:LSOHAF&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Mason, E., Pascual, A., Gaube, P., Ruiz, S., Pelegrí, J. L., and
Delepoulle, A.: Subregional characterization of mesoscale eddies across the
Brazil-Malvinas Confluence, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 3329–3357,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012611" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012611</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Naveira Garabato, A. C., Heywood, K. J., and Stevens, D. P.: Modification and
pathways of Southern Ocean Deep Waters in the Scotia Sea, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
49, 681–705, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(01)00071-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(01)00071-1</a>, 2002.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Naveira Garabato, A. C., Stevens, D. P., and Heywood, K. J.: Water mass
conversion, dluxes, and mixing in the Scotia Sea diagnosed by an inverse
model, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 33, 2565–2587, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033&lt;2565:WMCFAM&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033&lt;2565:WMCFAM&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Naveira Garabato, A. C., Jullion, L., Stevens, D. P., Heywood, K. J., and King,
B. A.: Variability of Subantartic Mode Water and Antarctic Intermediate Water
in the Drake  Passage during the late-twentieth and early-twenty-first
centuries, J. Climate, 22, 3661–3688, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2621.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2621.1</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Orsi, A. H., Whitworth III, T., and Nowlin Jr., W. D.: On the meridional
extent and fronts of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I,
42, 641–673, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(95)00021-W" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(95)00021-W</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Peterson, R. G.: The boundary currents in the western Argentine Basin,
Deep-Sea Res., 39, 623–644, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(92)90092-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(92)90092-8</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Peterson, R. G. and Whitworth III, T.: The subantarctic and polar fronts in
relation to deep water masses through the southwestern Atlantic, J. Geophys.
Res., 94, 10817–10838, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC094iC08p10817" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JC094iC08p10817</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, I. J., Stevens, D. P., Heywood, K. J., and Meredith, M. P.: The flow
of the  Antarctic Circumploar Current over the North Scotia Ridge, Deep-Sea
Res. Pt. I, 56, 14–28, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2009.10.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2009.10.010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Trathan, P. N., Brandon, M. A., Murphy, E. J., and Thorpe, S. E.: Transport and
structure within the Antarctic Circumpolar Current to the north of South
Georgia, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 1727–1730, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL011131" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL011131</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
UNESCO: The practical salinity Scale 1978 and the international equation of
state of seawater 1980, Techn. Pap. mar. sci, 36, 25 pp.,
1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
