<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">OS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Ocean Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">OS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ocean Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1812-0792</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/os-13-465-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Small river plumes off the northeastern coast of the Black Sea under
average climatic and flooding discharge conditions</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Small river plumes off the northeastern coast of the Black Sea}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A. Osadchiev and E.~Korshenko}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Osadchiev</surname><given-names>Alexander</given-names></name>
          <email>osadchiev@ocean.ru</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6659-0934</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Korshenko</surname><given-names>Evgeniya</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2310-9730</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Zubov State Oceanographic Institute, Moscow, Russia</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Alexander Osadchiev (osadchiev@ocean.ru)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>15</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>465</fpage><lpage>482</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>2</day><month>January</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>6</day><month>February</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17</day><month>May</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day><month>May</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://os.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://os.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>This study focuses on the impact of discharges of small
rivers on the delivery and fate of fluvial water and suspended matter at the
northeastern part of the Black Sea under different local precipitation
conditions. Several dozens of mountainous rivers flow into the sea at the
study region, and most of them, except for several of the largest, have
little annual runoff and affect adjacent coastal waters to a limited extent
under average climatic conditions. However, the discharges of these small
rivers are characterized by a quick response to precipitation events and can
significantly increase during and shortly after heavy rains, which are
frequent in the considered area. The delivery and fate of fluvial water and
terrigenous sediments at the study region, under average climatic and
rain-induced flooding conditions, were explored and compared using in situ
data, satellite imagery, and numerical modeling. It was shown that the
point-source spread of continental discharge dominated by several large
rivers under average climatic conditions can change to the line-source
discharge from numerous small rivers situated along the coast in response to
heavy rains. The intense line-source runoff of water and suspended sediments
forms a geostrophic alongshore current of turbid and freshened water, which
induces the intense transport of suspended and dissolved constituents
discharged with river waters in a northwestern direction. This process
significantly influences water quality and causes active sediment load at
large segments of the narrow shelf at the northeastern part of the Black
Sea compared to average climatic discharge conditions.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Continental discharge is one of the main sources of terrigenous sediments,
nutrients, and anthropogenic pollution in the sea and can significantly
affect seabed morphology, water quality, primary productivity, and fishery
in coastal areas (e.g., Emmet, 2006; Milliman et al., 2007; Zhou et al.,
2008; Rabalais, 2010). Generally, the majority of fluvial runoff and the
related discharge of its suspended and dissolved constituents on a regional
scale are provided by the largest local rivers, and small rivers (i.e.,
rivers with small drainage basins and small annual discharges) usually play
an insignificant role. Moreover, most of the world's small rivers are not
covered by regular hydrological and discharge measurements, which results in
a lack of information about their runoff volume and variability (Vorosmarty
et al., 2001; Hrachowitz et al., 2013). Hence, studies that focus on the
delivery and fate of river-borne dissolved and suspended matter in coastal
zones generally consider only one or several of the largest rivers of a
study area, and the influence of small local rivers is neglected.</p>
      <p>However, under certain terrain and climatic conditions, the cumulative
discharge from small rivers can greatly increase in response to heavy rains
and become comparable to or even exceed the runoff of large rivers (Mertes
and Warrick, 2001; Wheatcroft et al., 2010; Kniskern et al., 2011; Saldias et
al., 2016). This rain-induced flooding discharge of small rivers can
significantly influence the land–ocean fluxes of fluvial water, sediments,
nutrients, and pollutants as well as modify the structure and intensity of
coastal transport pathways for certain world regions, at least on a short-term
scale, as addressed in a number of relevant studies (e.g., Milliman and
Syvitski, 1992; Meybeck et al., 2003; Brodie et al., 2010; Hilton et al.,
2011; Bao et al., 2015; Warrick and Farnsworth, 2017).</p>
      <p>This article focuses on the impact of discharges of small rivers on the
delivery and fate of fluvial water and suspended sediments on the
northeastern coast of the Black Sea under different discharge conditions.
We considered two trial periods in summer and autumn (25 May to 4 July 2011
and 6–19 September 2011), characterized by seasonal freshet and drought
discharge conditions. Several flash-flooding events were registered during
both periods, which influenced large segments (50–200 km long) of the
coast.</p>
      <p>Based on in situ data, satellite imagery, and numerical modeling, we
reconstructed the daily volumes of fluvial water and terrigenous sediments
discharged during the trial periods from the 20 largest rivers of the study
region. To do this we used a recently developed method described in Osadchiev (2015).
Then, using a nested combination of the Eulerian model INMOM (Institute of
Numerical Mathematics Ocean Model) and the Lagrangian model STRiPE
(Surface-Trapped River Plume Evolution), we simulated the spread of buoyant
plumes generated by these rivers during the trial periods in two modes
characterized by different river discharge conditions. The first mode was
run using reconstructed discharge data (“real” mode), whereas the second
mode was run using smoothed discharge data; therefore, flash floods were
substituted by periods of average seasonal discharge (“averaged” mode).
Also, we simulated the transport and settling of river-borne terrigenous
sediments discharged during the first trial periods for both discharge
modes. Based on the obtained results of numerical modeling, we reconstructed
the transport patterns of river-borne suspended sediments for normal and
flash-flooding discharge conditions and showed the significant difference between them.</p>
      <p>This article is organized as follows. Section 2 provides detailed
information about the study region. Satellite and in situ data collected in
the study region and used for model application and validation are described
in Sect. 3. Description of the buoyant river plumes formed at the study
area and reconstruction of the daily hydrographs of the 20 largest rivers of
the study area are given in Sect. 4. Section 5 focuses on the general
description of the numerical model used to reproduce the delivery and fate
of fluvial water and river-borne terrigenous sediments. The results of
numerical simulations of river discharge spread and transport of suspended
sediments under average seasonal and flooding discharge conditions, as well
as the related discussion, are given in Sect. 6. A brief summary and the
conclusions are presented in Sect. 7.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Study area</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Topography and precipitation conditions</title>
      <p>The study region includes a 300 km section of the Russian coast of the Black
Sea (RCBS) between the city of Novorossiysk and the city of Sochi (Fig. 1).
The drainage basin of RCBS is a narrow area limited by the Greater Caucasus
Range at the east and the sea coast at the west. The height of the Greater
Caucasus Range increases from 400 m in the north to 3200 m in the south,
whereas the distance between the range and the sea coast increases from 10
to 40 km.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Location of the study region, disposition of the 20 largest rivers (thick black lines),
gauge stations (gray circles at the Mzymta and Sochi rivers), and bathymetry
of the coastal area.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/465/2017/os-13-465-2017-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>According to the Koppen climate classification, the study area lies in a
humid subtropical zone (Cfa) with hot and humid summers and cold winters.
The complex topography of RCBS greatly influences the local atmospheric
circulation and the local precipitation regime. In particular, orographic
lift induces frequent and intense rains at the southern side of the Greater
Caucasus Range. The mean annual precipitation volume steadily increases
(following the increase in height of the range) from 700 mm at the northern
part of RCBS to 1700 mm at the southern part. The local precipitation is
characterized by significant seasonal variability with a maximum in winter
and a minimum in summer. However, intense precipitation events can occur in
all months of the year; in particular, the maximal amount of daily rainfall
at the study region (298 mm) was registered in June.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>River discharge</title>
      <p>The steep gorges located between the numerous spurs of the Greater Caucasus
Range form the drainage basins of more than 50 rivers and watercourses,
which flow into the sea at the study region. The areas of these basins are
relatively small, and only eight of the considered rivers have annual
discharges greater than 10 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The total annual continental
runoff from RCBS to the sea is estimated as 7 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Jaoshvili, 2002).</p>
      <p>Discharge of the Mzymta River, which is the largest river of the study area,
is characterized by a drought period in autumn and winter and a freshet in
spring and early summer, associated with snow melting. The other rivers of
RCBS are mainly rain-fed, and their annual runoff volume is formed mainly
during short-term floods (15–25 annually) with sharp rises and falls of
discharge caused by the following conditions. The steep slopes of the
drainage basins (up to 40–60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) of these rivers and their
small sizes (below 900 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and high drainage densities (0.85–1.05)
cause the quick delivery of rain water into the river channels. As a result,
discharge of these rivers to the sea can significantly increase over
several hours in response to an active precipitation event (Balabanov et
al., 2011; Alexeevsky et al., 2016). For example, the heavy rain on 31 July
to 1 August 1991 caused an increase in discharge of the Tuapse River from
0.8 to 2300 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in less than 5 h, whereas subsequent recession
of its runoff lasted 3 days. Flooding periods are mainly registered during
winter (November–March), which provides 65–80 % of total annual
discharge of the small rivers of RCBS.</p>
      <p>According to Jaoshvili (2002), approximately 106 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of sediments are
discharged from the RCBS rivers to the northeastern part of the Black Sea.
Coarse sediments, which constitute approximately one-third of the total
sediment volume, are deposited at shallow areas near the shore, whereas fine
sediments are mainly transported offshore and settle on the deep ocean
floor. The annual average suspended sediment concentrations in the rivers of
the study area are 50–150 g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; however, the daily and seasonal
values are characterized by significant variability. In particular, the
average seasonal suspended sediment concentration in the Mzymta River varies
between 48 g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in February and 226 g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in May, whereas the
daily sediment concentrations vary between 0 and 11 000 g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. On
average, the concentration of suspended sediments in the Mzymta River
exceeds 1000 g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during 6 days in a year (Balabanov et al., 2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Coastal circulation and bathymetry</title>
      <p>The bathymetry of the study region is characterized by the narrow shelf, and
the distance from the shore to the 100 m isobath varies between 2 and 15 km.
Further offshore, the steep continental slope descends to a depth of 1000 m at a distance of 20–30 km from the shore (Fig. 1). Multiple underwater
canyons are located at the continental shelf and continental slope of the
study region. The narrowest shelf is located near the Pshada, Shakhe,
Mzymta, and Psou river estuaries, and these areas are characterized by
intense shelf erosion.</p>
      <p>General water transport of the Black Sea is governed by a current system
cyclonically circulating along the continental slope, which is generally
referred to as the Black Sea Rim Current (e.g., Oguz et al., 1992, 1993;
Kortotaev et al., 2003). The velocity of the Rim Current at the
northeastern part of the Black Sea is 0.2–0.5 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Coastal
circulation in the study region is also influenced by nearshore anticyclonic
eddies, which are regularly formed between the main flow of the Rim Current
and the coast owing to baroclinic instability caused by wind forcing and
coastal topography. The diameters of most of these eddies do not exceed 60 km; however, the spatial scales of the largest eddies can be up to 160 km.
Nearshore anticyclonic eddies formed in the study region move in a
northwestern direction along the continental slope with an average velocity
of 0.02–0.04 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas their average rotating velocity is
0.05–0.4 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ginzburg et al., 2002; Zatsepin et al., 2003;
Kubryakov and Stanichny, 2015a, b).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Data</title>
      <p>The in situ measurements used in this study were performed during two field
surveys organized by Shirshov Oceanology Institute on 28–30 May 2011 and
15–19 May 2012 at the southern part of RCBS (Fig. 1). Fieldwork took place
in the coastal areas influenced by the Dagomys, Sochi, Matsesta, Khosta,
Kudepsta, Mzymta, and Psou rivers. Field surveys included continuous
measurements of salinity and concentrations of total suspended matter (TSM),
colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM), and chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chl-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the
surface layer at areas adjacent to the river estuaries. The measurements
were performed along the ship track using a ship-mounted pump-through system
equipped with a CTD (conductivity, temperature, and depth)  instrument (<italic>SeaBird SBE911</italic>) and the ultraviolet fluorescent lidar (UFL-9) and
were organized as cross-shore transects; the distances between neighboring
transects near the river estuaries were 100–150 m. Additionally, vertical
profiles of salinity were measured within the river plumes using a CTD
instrument (<italic>SeaBird SBE19plus</italic>). The explicit description of the lidar instrument and the
algorithms used for retrieving TSM, CDOM, and Chl-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are given in Palmer et al. (2013). Detailed information about the field surveys and the
measurements described above can be found in Zavialov et al. (2014).</p>
      <p>Satellite data used in this study included EnviSat MERIS L1 satellite
imagery provided by the European Space Agency and L4 sea surface temperature
(SST) products derived and distributed in the framework of the Copernicus
Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS) project. EnviSat MERIS L1
satellite products with 300 m spatial resolution were used for retrieving
maps of sea surface distributions of TSM, CDOM, and Chl-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> using the MERIS
Case-2 Regional water processing module (Doerffer and Schiller, 2008). The
resulting TSM and Chl-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions were validated against the results of
analysis of the water samples collected at the surface layer and optical
remote sensing performed by lidar at the southern part of the study region.
Daily gap-free SST maps of the Black Sea with 0.0625<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> spatial
resolution were obtained from the processing and statistical interpolation
of nighttime measurements collected by infrared satellite sensors mounted
on different satellite platforms. Details of SST data processing are
described in Nardelli et al. (2009, 2013).</p>
      <p>Meteorological data for the Black Sea area were calculated by the Weather
Research and Forecasting (WRF) model (version 3.6) using the Lambert
conformal conic projection with a horizontal spatial resolution of 10 km.
The vertical coordinate was represented by 35 levels, and the time step was
set equal to 90 s. Initial and boundary conditions for WRF were obtained
from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction Final Analysis
product. Finally, in this work we used daily gauge data of river discharge
measured at the Sochi and Mzymta rivers (Fig. 1) and provided by the Federal
Service for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring of Russia.</p>
      <p>The in situ, satellite, and WRF model data described above were used for,
first, evaluation of the river discharge for ungauged rivers of the study
region (Sect. 4.2), and, second, application and validation of the
numerical model, which reproduced the delivery and fate of fluvial water and
river-borne terrigenous sediments at the northwestern part of the Black Sea
during the simulation periods (Sect. 6). In particular, the ability of the
numerical model to reproduce sub-mesoscale variability of the river plumes
of RCBS, which is crucial for this study, was proved based on the salinity
and TSM in situ data collected during 28–30 May 2011 on the field cruise
(Sect. 6.1).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>River plumes at RCBS</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Structure and variability of river plumes</title>
      <p>Multiple rivers of RCBS form buoyant plumes adjacent to the river estuaries.
Under average climatic discharge conditions, the most extensive river plume
is generated by the Mzymta River, the largest river of the study area, whose
mean monthly discharge varies between 20 and 120 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Generally, the Mzymta plume occupies less than 10 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of the coastal
zone and its depth does not exceed 5 m; however, during spring and summer
freshet periods, it can increase up to 50 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The horizontal and
vertical spatial scales of the other river plumes of RCBS are even smaller
except for short-term periods of flooding discharge induced by heavy rains.
An example of surface salinity distributions and vertical salinity profiles
near a river estuary for small (Sochi, 16 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 17 May  2012)
and large (Mzymta, 81 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 18 May 2012) river plumes is shown
in Fig. 2.</p>
      <p>The rivers of the study region are characterized by elevated concentrations
of suspended sediments compared to sea water. As a result, salinity
correlates well with turbidity at the surface layer and the river plumes can
be effectively detected by optical satellite imagery, as addressed in
Zavialov et al. (2014) and Osadchiev (2015) (Fig. 3). Thus, ocean color
remote sensing is an efficient tool for monitoring river plumes at the study
region.</p>
      <p>Both in situ and satellite measurements revealed high spatial and temporal
variability of the river plumes of RCBS. Their area, form, and shape can
significantly change in less than 1 day in response to variations of
river discharge and local wind forcing (Korotkina et al., 2011, 2014;
Zavailov et al., 2014). Under average discharge conditions, the river plumes
are distinctly separated because their spatial scales do not exceed the
distances between the river estuaries. However, during rain-induced floods,
the areas of the river plumes significantly increase, and the plumes can
collide and coalesce with neighboring plumes. The most intense precipitation
events cause the formation of a continuous coastal strip of turbid water,
which can be observed by satellite imagery (Fig. 3b). After the end of a
flooding period, this strip dissipates and river plume areas decrease to
their average seasonal sizes (Fig. 3c).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Surface salinity distributions (top panel) and vertical salinity
profiles (bottom panel) at the Sochi plume on 17 May 2012 (left) and at the
Mzymta plume on 18 May 2012 (right).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/465/2017/os-13-465-2017-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Satellite-derived surface TSM distribution at RCBS <bold>(a)</bold> before,
<bold>(b)</bold>
during, and <bold>(c)</bold> after a flash-flooding event.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/465/2017/os-13-465-2017-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Reconstruction of river discharge</title>
      <p>In this work, we explored discharges of the 20 largest rivers of the study
region. The list of them, sorted from north to south, is as follows: Pshada,
Vulan, Dzhubga, Shapsukho, Nechepsukho, Tu, Nebug, Agoi, Tuapse, Shepsi,
Ashe, Psezuapse, Shakhe, Dagomys, Sochi, Matsesta, Khosta, Kudepsta, Mzymta,
and Psou. These rivers are estimated to provide approximately 95 % of the
annual runoff of fluvial water and sediments from RCBS (Jaoshvili, 2002).</p>
      <p>The Mzymta and Sochi rivers are the only rivers of the study region with
available daily gauge measurements during the trial periods (25 May to 4
July 2011 and 6–19 September 2011). Discharge volumes of the other 18 rivers
were evaluated using the method described in Osadchiev (2015). The general
idea of this method is to use satellite-derived properties of a river plume
for reconstruction of the conditions of its formation, in particular river
discharge volume. First, the spatial extent and the shape of the river plume
are identified by satellite imagery. Second, a hydrodynamic model, which
simulates the formation of river plumes, is run with a variety of forcing
conditions to identify the discharge rate that provides the best match
between modeled and observed plumes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Daily discharge rates of the rivers of RCBS during 25 May to 4
July 2011 (left) and 6–19 September 2011 (right), measured at the gauge
stations (for the Mzymta and Sochi rivers) and reconstructed using satellite
imagery and numerical modeling (for the Shakhe, Psou, and small rivers).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/465/2017/os-13-465-2017-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Logarithmic dependences of TSM concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on
river discharge rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the large (left) and small
(right) rivers of RCBS.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/465/2017/os-13-465-2017-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The numerical model, based on the method described above, was tuned for the
Mzymta and Sochi rivers and validated against gauge data. This model
analyzed TSM, CDOM, and Chl-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution maps derived from EnviSat MERIS
satellite imagery to identify river plumes at the study area. Then, it
applied the STRiPE model for simulating the formation of river plumes.
Details of the method, the numerical model, and its validation are given in
Osadchiev (2015). After passing the validation procedure, the model was
applied to quantify the discharge of ungauged rivers of RCBS during the
trial periods. The discharge values for the considered rivers were obtained
for 11–13 out of 41 days of the first trial period and for 6–8 out of 14
days of the second trial period. The number of days with reconstructed
discharge is not the same for the considered rivers, because it depends on
the feasibility of identification of river plumes, i.e., availability of
cloud-free satellite imagery at the respective coastal areas.</p>
      <p>However, discharge values during the days of the trial periods, which were
not covered by appropriate satellite images, remained unknown. They were
prescribed based on reconstructed discharge data and WRF precipitation data
in the following manner. The satellite-derived discharge values revealed
relatively uniform river runoff during the trial periods, except for several
short-term flooding events with significantly elevated discharge. The flash
floods at the rivers showed good correlation with the rain events at the
respective river basins reconstructed by the WRF model. These rain events
were observed during 25–27 May, 30 May, 21–23 June, and 27–30 June in the
first trial period and during 9–12 September in the second trial period.
Based on this, we presumed that periods of peak discharge during the
flooding events correspond to periods of active precipitation registered at
the respective river basin. Thus, the satellite-derived discharge values
were linearly extrapolated until the day of the formation of a flooding event,
followed by a sharp increase in discharge to the peak value and a linear
decrease to the average discharge conditions after the end of a flooding
event.</p>
      <p>The resulting hydrographs of the Shakhe, Sochi, Mzymta, and Psou rivers
(whose annual runoff is greater than 15 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, hereinafter
referred to as the large rivers of RCBS, are presented in Fig. 4 together
with the variation of the total discharge of the other 16 rivers,
hereinafter referred to as the small rivers of RCBS. The measured and
reconstructed discharges of fluvial water from the 20 largest rivers of RCBS
show that continental runoff is dominated by several of the largest rivers  of the
study region during periods of average seasonal discharge. The Shakhe,
Sochi, Mzymta, and Psou rivers provided 65–85 % of daily continental
runoff during the trial periods. Flooding events significantly change this
proportion, especially during autumn drought, when the average seasonal
discharge rates of all the rivers of the study area are relatively low. In
particular, the share of the large rivers of RCBS in total runoff during the
flash floods decreased to 45 % during the first trial period and to 20 %
during the second trial period.</p>
      <p>After evaluation of the daily river discharge values, we reconstructed the
daily concentrations of suspended sediments at the near-field parts of the
considered river plumes, which were used as input data for the numerical
modeling addressed in Sect. 6. First, the TSM concentrations were
retrieved from the satellite and in situ data for the respective days of the
trial periods. They showed strong logarithmic dependence on the
reconstructed river discharge values separately within the large rivers and
the small rivers of RCBS (Fig. 5). The Pearson correlation coefficient
between ln(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ln(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was equal to 0.82 for the large rivers and 0.8 for the
small rivers, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the TSM concentration (g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the river
discharge (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). A t-test showed that both correlations were
significant at the 0.01 level. Based on this, we used the obtained equations
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for large rivers and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for small rivers, which
are consistent with previous studies (Jaoshvili, 1986; Balabanov et al.,
2011), for reconstructing the daily variability of TSM concentrations of the
rivers of RCBS during the trial periods.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Model</title>
      <p>In this work, we applied numerical modeling to study the delivery and fate
of fluvial water and terrigenous sediments at RCBS under average seasonal
and flooding river discharge conditions. Accurate simulation of the
sub-mesoscale river plume dynamics are essential for the correct reconstruction
of the transport, mixing, and settling of fluvial water and suspended
sediments in the coastal area. On the other hand, correct simulation of the
mesoscale coastal circulation is also important, because it, first,
influences river plume dynamics and, second, governs the transport and
settling of river-borne suspended sediments after they sink beneath the
plumes into the ambient ocean. For this reason, we used a nested combination
of Eulerian and Lagrangian numerical models, which accurately reproduce both
the mesoscale sea circulation and the sub-mesoscale dynamics of multiple
river plumes of the study area.</p>
      <p>River-borne terrigenous sediments are tracked as passive tracers of river
outflow. Initially, tracers are transported by buoyant plume waters whose
dynamics are simulated by the STRiPE model. After the sediment particle
settles beneath the plume, its movement is governed by ambient coastal
circulation, reproduced by the INMOM model. The similar configuration of
coupled Eulerian (Princeton Ocean Model) and Lagrangian (STRiPE) models was
recently used for simulation of the delivery and fate of fluvial water and
terrigenous sediments discharged by the Peinan River at the southeastern
coast of the island of Taiwan under freshet and typhoon discharge conditions
(Osadchiev et al., 2016) and for studying the dynamical features of the
Zhuoshui and Wu river plumes located on the western coast of Taiwan
(Korotenko et al., 2014).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <title>INMOM model</title>
      <p>An outer Eulerian model is INMOM, a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-coordinate ocean circulation
model based on the primitive equations of ocean hydrothermodynamics with the
Boussinesq and hydrostatic approximations. The global version of INMOM was
used as the oceanic component of the IPCC climate model INMCM in the
framework of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (Volodin et
al., 2010) as well as for modeling the Arctic Ocean (Johnson et al., 2012)
in the framework of the Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison Project, and the South
Ocean (Downes et al., 2015; Farneti et al., 2015) and North Atlantic
Ocean (Danabasoglu et al., 2016) in the framework of the Coordinated
Ocean-ice Reference Experiments.</p>
      <p>In this study, we used a regional version of INMOM developed for the Black
Sea. It uses polar coordinates for the horizontal dimensions and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-coordinates for the vertical dimension. The INMOM model domain covers the
whole Black Sea basin to avoid open boundaries (Fig. 6). It is divided into
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">642</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">715</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal grid points (radius and azimuth), and the pole
is located at RCBS (40.205<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 43.84<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N). The INMOM
horizontal spatial resolution increases from 200 m at the northeastern part
of the Black Sea to 4.5 km at its southwestern part. Thus, INMOM, on the
one hand, reproduces mesoscale circulation of the whole Black Sea with
moderate spatial resolution and, on the other hand, provides high spatial
resolution at the study region, which is an important advantage of INMOM compared to other Eulerian ocean models in the context of this work. Several
studies used this regional version of INMOM for studying aspects of the
general circulation of the Black Sea (Zalesny et al., 2012, 2013) and the
coastal circulation at RCBS (Diansky et al., 2013; Zalesny et al., 2016a,
b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>INMOM model domain at the Black Sea (every 15th grid point is
shown) (left) and at RCBS (every 4th grid point is shown) with indication of
the location of the considered river estuaries (right).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/465/2017/os-13-465-2017-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>A Laplacian operator along isopycnic surfaces is used for parameterization
of the lateral diffusion of salinity and temperature, whereas a bi-Laplacian
operator along the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-surface is used for the lateral viscosity on
momentum (Volodin et al., 2010). The vertical coordinate is represented by
20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-levels with irregular vertical spacing to provide higher
resolution near the surface. The vertical viscosity and diffusion
coefficients were parameterized as a function of the Richardson number
according to the Pacanowsky and Philander scheme (Pacanowsky and Philander,
1981). The minimum water depth in the model domain was set equal to 3.5 m.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Surface and lateral boundary conditions for the INMOM model runs were set in
the following manner. No heat and salt flux as well as no flow across the
bottom and lateral solid boundaries were prescribed. No-slip and quadratic
bottom friction conditions with drag coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were applied to the lateral and bottom boundaries,
respectively. The surface turbulent fluxes are calculated using bulk
formulas. The INMOM model was forced with climatological runoff of the 14
largest rivers flowing into the Black Sea and water transport through the
Kerch and Bosporus straits, which were set according to the data provided in
Jaoshvili (2002). Atmospheric forcing was adopted from the WRF data set.
Tidal currents at the Black Sea are low and do not significantly influence
general sea circulation (Gregg and Ozsoy, 1999); therefore, tidal forcing
was not considered in numerical modeling. The INMOM model was initialized
using the monthly-averaged climatic temperature and salinity fields with
25–50 km spatial resolution (Ivanov and Belokopytov, 2013) as initial
background conditions and provided ambient velocity fields for the STRiPE
and sediment transport models. Owing to inaccuracy of available
precipitation and river discharge, corrections of the simulated SST and sea
surface salinity (SSS) fields were applied using daily satellite SST
products provided in the framework of the CMEMS project (Nardelli et al.,
2009, 2013) and monthly-averaged climatic fields of the SSS of the Black Sea
described above. The model time step was set equal to 90 s.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>STRiPE model</title>
      <p>INMOM provides boundary conditions for the inner STRiPE model, which was
developed for high-resolution simulation of the sub-mesoscale dynamics of
buoyant river plumes. STRiPE is a Lagrangian model that reproduces a river
plume as a set of imaginary “particles”, i.e., homogeneous elementary
water columns of reduced salinity extending from the surface down to the
boundary between the plume and the underlying sea water. These particles are
discharged into the sea from river estuaries, and their initial velocity and
height are governed by the river discharge rate and river estuary depth,
respectively. The subsequent motion of individual particles and their mixing
with the underlying sea water are tracked by the model. The overall set of
particles represents the river plume, and hence the temporal evolution of
the plume structure is obtained. The main advantage of STRiPE lies in its
ability to provide realistic results at relatively low computational cost compared to Eulerian models. STRiPE was applied for studying plumes formed
by small- and medium-size rivers of RCBS by Osadchiev and Zavialov (2013) and
Osadchiev (2015).</p>
      <p>The STRiPE model domain covers the area from 38.0 to 40.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and
from 43.1 to 44.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. The STRiPE model was forced by WRF wind
forcing, coastal circulation provided by the INMOM model, and river
discharge prescribed according to the data described in Sect. 4.2. The
initial inflow velocities of the rivers <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were calculated using the
Manning formula <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the river discharge and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the width of the river mouth.
The river and ambient sea water densities were given as 1000 and 1017 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The model time step was set equal to 90 s.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <title>Sediment transport model</title>
      <p>The transport and settling of fine suspended sediments discharged from the
river mouth was simulated using a Lagrangian particle-tracking model. Both
the horizontal and vertical movements of a sediment particle were calculated
using a combination of a deterministic component defined by motion of
ambient water and sinking of a particle under gravity force and a stochastic
random-walk scheme that reproduces the influence of small-scale turbulent
mixing. Particles are initially released from the river mouth, and their
horizontal transport is determined by the internal dynamics of a river plume
simulated by the STRiPE model. After the sediment particle settles beneath
the plume, its movement is governed by ambient coastal circulation,
reproduced by the INMOM model. The detailed description of the sediment
transport model is given in Osadchiev et al. (2016). TSM concentrations of
river water were prescribed according to the data described in Sect. 4.2,
whereas the sediment grain distribution was set based on the granulometric
analysis of suspended sediments of water samples collected at the considered
rivers during field surveys.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <title>Model validation</title>
      <p>The INMOM model simulated general circulation of the Black Sea during the
period from January to September 2011. In this work, we considered the upper
ocean dynamics for a regional model of the Black Sea with daily SST and
monthly SSS data assimilation. As a result, the model reached a
statistically steady state after a relatively short spin-up period of 5
months (January–May 2011). The main large-scale and mesoscale circulation
features described in Sect. 2.3 were adequately reproduced by numerical
modeling, including the Black Sea Rim Current, the three quasi-stationary
cyclonic gyres at the central divergence zone, and the four quasi-stationary
anticyclonic gyres at the eastern part of the Black Sea near Sebastopol,
Kerch, Batumi, and Gelendzhik (Oguz et al., 1992, 1993, 1995; Stanev, 1995;
Staneva et al., 2001). These features are visible in Fig. 7, which shows the
modeled Black Sea current field at a depth of 10 m projected on a uniform
grid with 10 km spatial resolution and averaged for June 2011. The model
also reproduced seasonal variations of sea surface circulation, in
particular winter–spring intensification of the Rim Current, meandering of
the main flow of the Rim Current caused by baroclinic instability, and
formation of multiple nearshore anticyclonic eddies during summer at the
eastern part of the Black Sea (Oguz et al., 1992, 1993; Titov, 2002;
Zatsepin et al., 2003; Enriquez et al., 2005). The simulated main flow of
the Rim Current shifts offshore (approximately 45 km) in June and its speed
decreases to 20 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 7), which is in good agreement with the in
situ measurements described by Titov (2002).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>General surface circulation scheme of the Black Sea (top panel; 1 – mean
position of the cyclonic Rim Current; 2 – quasi-stationary cyclonic gyres;
3 – Sebastopol; 4 – Kerch; 5 – Gelendzhik; 6 – Batumi quasi-stationary
anticyclonic gyres) and the INMOM modeled Black Sea circulation
at a depth of 10 m, averaged for June 2011 (bottom panel).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/465/2017/os-13-465-2017-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Measured (top panel) and modeled (bottom panel) surface salinity
distributions near the Mzymta River estuary on 28–30 May 2011.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/465/2017/os-13-465-2017-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The nested model was applied to simulate the dynamics of the river plumes of
RCBS during the trial periods, 25 May to 4 July 2011 and 6–19 September
2011. Most of the days within these periods were characterized by typical
spring–summer freshet and autumn drought conditions. The model at every
time step outputs surface distributions of salinity and suspended sediments;
thus, real mode simulations were validated against in situ salinity
(Fig. 8) and TSM (Fig. 9) measurements as well as satellite-derived TSM
distribution maps (Figs. 10 and 11).</p>
      <p>The low computational cost of the Lagrangian model STRiPE enabled us to
reproduce the dynamics of individual river plumes with high spatial
resolution. In particular, the model adequately reproduced sub-mesoscale
variability of the Mzymta plume observed during the field survey on 28–30
May 2011, which is illustrated by Figs. 8 and 9. The spring freshet
discharge of the Mzymta River was equal to 90–100 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the
end of May 2011. On 28 and 30 May 2011, the Mzymta plume was stretched in a
southern direction from the river mouth in response to moderate northerly
and northwesterly wind. However, a significantly different wind forcing
and, therefore, plume position and shape were observed on 29 May 2011. The
Mzymta plume was arrested near the estuary by a slight onshore wind, which
caused an increase in its area and a salinity anomaly near the estuary. The
average positions of the simulated plume corresponding to 12:00–18:00 LT on
28–30 May 2011 illustrate this significant displacement and show good
agreement with the salinity maps of the region obtained from the continuous
CTD measurements in the surface layer (Fig. 8).</p>
      <p>The simulated sediment distribution within the Mzymta plume was also
validated against the in situ data. For this purpose, we used continuous
measurements of TSM concentration in the surface layer carried out by the
ultraviolet fluorescent lidar during the field survey and compared them with
the simulated concentrations of suspended sediments. Both field data and
numerical modeling showed that surface waters with elevated turbidity
corresponded to the position of the plume during the whole simulation period
(Fig. 9). Sediment concentration in the study region increased on 29 May in
response to slight wind forcing, which was reproduced by numerical modeling.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Measured (top panel) and modeled (bottom panel) surface TSM
distributions near the Mzymta River estuary on 28–30 May 2011.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/465/2017/os-13-465-2017-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p>Numerical simulations were organized in the following manner. The validated
model was applied to simulate the dynamics of the river plumes formed by the
20 largest rivers of RCBS and the related delivery and fate of fine
terrigenous sediments during two trial periods, 25 May to 4 July 2011 and
6–19 September 2011. The main reason for selection of these trial periods
was their good coverage by optical remote sensing. A cloudless coastal area
of RCBS was visible by EnviSat MERIS satellite imagery for 17 out of 41 days
of the first period and for 9 out of 14 days of the second period.</p>
      <p>The first model run (25 May to 4 July 2011, real mode) represented
typical spring–summer freshet discharges of the large rivers of RCBS and
relatively low discharges of small rivers. The second model run (6–19
September 2011, real mode) simulated typical autumn drought discharge
conditions for all rivers of the study region. Four intense rain events
(25–27 May, 30 May, 21–23 June, and 27–30 June) during the first trial
period and one (9–12 September) during the second trial period caused a
considerable increase in discharge of small rivers and a subsequent decrease
to average seasonal values, as discussed in Sect. 1. The third and fourth
model runs (averaged modes) reconstructed the spread of river plumes
during the trial periods under seasonal discharge conditions without flash
floods. For this purpose, the real river discharge values were averaged
over a period of 10 days. As a result, the total discharge volumes of
fluvial water did not change, but their daily hydrographs were significantly
modified during the flooding periods, i.e., the discharge peaks were
significantly smoothed.</p>
      <p>We also simulated the transport and settling of river-borne suspended
sediments discharged during the first trial period under real and
averaged conditions and reconstructed distributions of fine sediments
deposited on the seabed in the study area. Thus, numerical simulations in
the averaged mode reproduced the delivery and fate of fluvial water and
suspended matter under average climatic discharge conditions, i.e., in the
absence of flash floods, whereas real model runs combined both average
climatic and flooding discharge conditions. Therefore, comparing the model
outputs in real and “average” modes, we can distinguish the effect of
short-term but intense flash-flooding events on the transport, mixing, and
settling of fluvial water and terrigenous sediments at the study area. In
particular, based on the analysis and comparison of the obtained results of
the real and averaged model runs, we reconstructed the transport
patterns of river-borne suspended sediments for normal and flash-flooding
discharge conditions during freshet and drought seasons.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Modeled real mode (top panel) and satellite-derived (bottom
panel) surface TSM distributions at RCBS on 26 June, 1 July, and 4 July
2011.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/465/2017/os-13-465-2017-f10.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1">
  <title>Flash floods under real discharge conditions</title>
      <p>The typical example of a significant increase in the areas of buoyant plumes,
formed by the rivers of RCBS along a large segment of the coast in response
to an active precipitation event, and their subsequent decrease was observed
on 26 June to 4 July 2011 (Figs. 10 and 11). On 26 June 2011, the Mzymta
River was the only significant source of fluvial water and terrigenous
sediments at the coastal area of RCBS, hereinafter referred to as the
point-source discharge pattern. The Mzymta plume was stretched along the
shore in a northern direction, and its area was approximately 30 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Plumes formed by the Psou, Sochi, and other smaller rivers of RCBS on 26
June 2011 were considerably smaller than the Mzymta plume. Their spatial
scales did not exceed 1–2 km, and their impact on coastal water quality was
negligible. The suspended sediment discharge rate from the Mzymta River was
4.8 kg s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the total sediment discharge from the other modeled
rivers of RCBS was slightly more than half (2.5 kg s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. River-borne
terrigenous sediments were transported northward by the Mzymta plume, the
coarse fraction was deposited mainly along the shore near the Mzymta
estuary, and the fine fraction was transported offshore by ambient coastal
circulation.</p>
      <p>Heavy rains, which lasted during 27–30 June 2011, affected most of the
rivers of RCBS and caused a rapid and substantial rise of continental
discharge of fluvial water and suspended sediments, especially from the
small rivers of the study region (Fig. 4). On 29 June, individual river
plumes coalesced into a continuous coastal strip of freshened (14–17 PSU)
and turbid (2.5–7.5 g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> water between the Dzhubga and Psou rivers
(Fig. 10). This strip was formed by multiple sources located along the
shore, hereinafter referred to as the line-source discharge pattern. Its
alongshore length exceeded 150 km, whereas its cross-shore width was
approximately 5 km, which is equal to the local internal Rossby radius.
However, near the estuaries of the large rivers of RCBS, the width of the
strip increased to 10–15 km, and its depth was up to 5 m. The discharge of
suspended sediments increased by 1 order of magnitude and was equal to
25–50 kg s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Mzymta River; 10–25 kg s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the Psou;
Shakhe, and Sochi rivers; and 1–5 kg s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the small rivers of RCBS.
As a result, large volumes of coarse sediments were deposited near multiple
river estuaries along the shore. The intense line-source discharge also
caused the formation of a strong alongshore geostrophic current (up to 40 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within the freshened strip, which is typical for far-field regions
of river plumes (e.g., Garvine, 1987; O'Donnell, 1990; Fong and Geyer, 2002;
Horner-Devine et al., 2006). This surface current caused intense transport
of fine terrigenous sediments in the direction of Kelvin wave propagation,
i.e., in a northwestern direction.</p>
      <p>After the end of the peak discharge period, the line-source discharge
pattern switched to the point-source pattern, and the freshened strip
steadily diminished over several days and eventually dissipated on 3 July.
Distributions of salinity and TSM at the study area on 4 July were similar
to those observed before the flooding event (Fig. 10). The only large river
plume (approximately 20 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was formed by the Mzymta River, and the
areas of the other river plumes decreased to their average seasonal scales.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Modeled real mode (top panel) and satellite-derived (bottom
panel) surface TSM distributions at the southern part of the study region on
26 June, 1 July, and 4 July 2011.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/465/2017/os-13-465-2017-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The influence of three other flash-flooding events (25–27 May, 30 May, and
21–23 June 2011) on coastal waters during the first trial period was also
reconstructed by numerical modeling. The heavy rain event, which took place
at the southern part of the study region during 21–23 June 2011, caused the
formation of a line-source discharge pattern between the Shakhe and Mzymta
rivers. Discharge of fluvial water and suspended sediments from the
individual rivers increased by 1 (from 1–10 to 20–100 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and 2 (from 0.01–0.1 to 2.5–25 kg s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> orders of magnitude,
respectively. The freshened and turbid strip between the Shakhe and Mzymta
rivers (60 km long) was observed during 21–24 June and dissipated on 25
June. Alongshore geostrophic current was also wide (up to 15 km), but less
intense (up to 25 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, compared to that observed at the end of
June and the beginning of July 2011.</p>
      <p>Two less intense and shorter (compared to those
described above) flash-flooding events were observed on 25–27 May and 30 May 2011 at the southern
part of RCBS between the Shakhe and Psou rivers. They caused a moderate
increase in the river discharges (up to 25 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, except for the
Shakhe (50 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on 25–27 May) and Psou (85 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> on
30–31 May) rivers. As a result, the areas of the river plumes were not large
enough to collide, so these moderate flooding events did not cause the
formation of the freshened alongshore strip.</p>
      <p>The influence of a rain-induced flooding event on coastal waters was also
studied during a drought period in September 2011. The discharge rates of
fluvial water and suspended sediments from the Mzymta, Psou, Shakhe, and
Sochi rivers were equal to 6–15 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.05–0.4 kg s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
whereas the total discharge rates from the small rivers were 10–15 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and less than 0.1 kg s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The spatial scales and
salinity anomalies of the river plumes did not exceed 1 km and 2 PSU. The
rain-induced flooding event, which occurred during 10–13 September 2011,
caused an increase in discharge of the small rivers by 1 order of
magnitude, whereas the discharge of the large rivers rose twofold or less.
As a result, the discharge of terrigenous sediments from the small rivers
increased by 2 orders of magnitude (1–8 kg s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and exceeded
sediment discharge from the large rivers (0.5–1 kg s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, the
total volume of continental discharge during 10–13 September 2011 was less
than that during 27–30 June 2011. A strip of freshened and turbid water
was formed between the Pshada and Psou rivers, but it was not continuous and
had several gaps 5–10 km long. The maximal width (5 km) and depth (3 m) of
the strip were also significantly less than those observed at the end of
June 2011. Nevertheless, the geostrophic current (10–20 cm s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within
this strip caused the northeastward transport of fine terrigenous sediments
over 4 days until the end of the flash flood on 14 September 2011, when the
freshened strip dissipated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS2">
  <title>Averaged mode numerical experiments</title>
      <p>The averaged mode experiments simulated the delivery and fate of fluvial
water and suspended sediments of RCBS during the trial periods in the
absence of flooding events. Averaging the discharge hydrographs over a
period of 10 days significantly influenced the small rivers by reducing the
peak discharge values. As a result, the variability of the total discharge
of the small rivers during the first trial period changed from 21–224 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the real mode to 40–108 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the
averaged mode. Averaging the discharge rates of the large rivers of RCBS
modified them less considerably, e.g., the variability of the Mzymta
discharge changed from 47–139 to 54–91 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Under the averaged discharge conditions, the Mzymta and Psou rivers were
the only significant sources of fluvial water and terrigenous sediments
during the whole first trial period. Spatial scales of the Mzymta and Psou
plumes exceeded 10 km, whereas the other rivers did not form plumes greater
than 1–2 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> even during the period of their maximal discharge on 1
July 2011 (Fig. 12). The total sediment discharge rate of the Mzymta and
Psou rivers was 8–28 kg s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the total discharge rate of all
the other rivers did not exceed 3.5 kg s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, the point-source
discharge pattern was observed during the whole first trial period. Coarse
fractions of suspended sediments were deposited mainly near the Mzymta and
Psou estuaries, whereas fine fractions were transported offshore to the deep
ocean by ambient coastal circulation.</p>
      <p>During the second trial period, spatial scales of all the river plumes of
RCBS under the averaged discharge conditions were less than 1 km. As a
result, the point-source discharge pattern was observed during the whole
trial period. Owing to the absence of flooding events characterized by
intense sediment runoff, the daily sediment discharge from RCBS under the
averaged discharge conditions was much smaller than that under the
real discharge conditions and did not exceed 3 kg s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, the
rate of sediment load to the seabed was negligible under these conditions
throughout the whole study area.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Modeled surface TSM distribution at RCBS (left) and its southern
part (right) under the averaged mode on 1 July 2011.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/465/2017/os-13-465-2017-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Simulated distribution of terrigenous sediments discharged from
the rivers of the study area during 25 May to 4 July 2011 and deposited on
the seabed at RCBS (top panel) and its southern part (bottom panel) under
the real (left) and averaged (right) modes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/13/465/2017/os-13-465-2017-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS3">
  <title>Sediment transport and deposition</title>
      <p>Besides salinity and TSM distributions at the study area, the nested model
simulated the transport and settling of river-borne terrigenous sediments
discharged from the rivers of RCBS during the first trial period under
real and averaged discharge conditions. The obtained distributions
of terrigenous sediments deposited on the seabed at the study area are
presented in Fig. 13.</p>
      <p>The total discharge volumes from the individual rivers during the first
trial period were the same for both simulation modes; however, the daily
discharge rates were significantly different, especially during flash-flooding periods. Owing to nonlinearity of the dependence of sediment
discharge rate on water discharge rate, the total sediment flux from the
modeled rivers during 41 days of the first trial period under the real
mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg) was greater by a quarter than under the
averaged mode (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> kg).</p>
      <p>The resulting deposit patterns obtained for the two modes were also
significantly different. Under the averaged discharge conditions, most
of the river-borne sediments were discharged from the Mzymta, Psou, Sochi,
Shakhe, and Tuapse rivers and were deposited near their estuaries. The
region of the most active sediment load (0.2–0.5 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> provided by
the Mzymta and Psou rivers was located at the southern part of the study
region, and its alongshore extent and area were approximately 20 and 60 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The area of the region adjacent to the Mzymta estuary, where
sediment load exceeded 0.4 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, was approximately 5 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>As in the averaged mode run, the Mzymta and Psou rivers were major
sources of suspended sediments at the study region under the real
discharge conditions. However, the flash-flooding events, reproduced in the
real mode, resulted in significant sediment runoff from the other rivers
of RCBS. Moreover, the formation of strong alongshore geostrophic currents
of turbid and freshened water on 21 to 24 June and 29 June to 2 July 2011
resulted in an intense transport of sediments along the shore in a
northwestern direction. In particular, large volumes of sediments
discharged from the large southern rivers (Psou, Mzymta, Sochi, and Shakhe)
were transported several tens of kilometers from their sources and settled
on the seabed at the large segments of the shelf area. As a result, sediment
load exceeded 0.1 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> along almost the whole shore between the Psou
and Dzhubga rivers. The total alongshore length of the coast influenced by
active sedimentation was approximately 150 km, which is significantly
greater than the corresponding length (35 km) observed under the
averaged discharge conditions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p>This study focused on the influence of the river plumes of RCBS on the
delivery and fate of fluvial water and terrigenous sediments under average
climatic and flooding discharge conditions. We used a nested combination of
the INMOM and the STRiPE. The Eulerian model INMOM reproduced general ocean
circulation at the northeastern part of the Black Sea and provided boundary
conditions for the Lagrangian model STRiPE, which was used for simulating
the dynamics of river plumes. The model was validated against in situ
measurements and satellite imagery. To study the influence of flash floods
on the delivery and fate of fluvial water and terrigenous sediments during
freshet and drought seasons, we considered two trial periods: 25 May to 4
July 2011 and 6–19 September 2011. Based on in situ data, satellite imagery,
and numerical modeling, we reconstructed the daily values of fluvial water
and terrigenous sediments discharged during the trial periods from the 20
largest rivers of the study region. Then, for both trial periods, we
simulated the spread of buoyant plumes in two modes: first, using
reconstructed discharge data (real mode) and, second, excluding flash-flooding periods by averaging the discharge data over a period of 10 days
(averaged mode).</p>
      <p>Numerical experiments showed that short-term rain-induced flooding events
significantly influence sediment transport and deposition patterns at RCBS.
Under average climatic discharge conditions, the total runoff of fluvial
water and terrigenous sediments is dominated by several of the largest rivers of
the study area. Water and sediment yield from the small rivers is low;
therefore, their plumes have small spatial scales and high dissipation
rates, and their impact on coastal water quality is negligible. As a result,
continental discharge significantly influences water quality and induces
intense sediment load only near the estuaries of large rivers.</p>
      <p>Active precipitation events can cause a rapid and substantial increase in
water and sediment discharge from the small rivers of RCBS and can induce
the formation of flash-flooding conditions at long segments of the seashore
during both freshet and drought seasons. Under these conditions, the areas
of the river plumes increase significantly, and individual plumes can
collide and coalesce with neighboring ones. As a result, the related change
of the discharge pattern from point-source to line-source can cause the
formation of one or several alongshore strips of freshened and turbid water
up to 200 km and markedly transform the transport pathways of river-borne
suspended and dissolved matter at the study region. These strips influence
the dynamics of river plumes by decreasing the mixing intensity between the
plumes and ambient water, thus increasing the spatial scales of the river
plumes. Also, alongshore geostrophic currents of turbid and freshened water,
which are formed within these strips, induce the intense transport of
sediments in a northwestern direction and their settling along the shore.
This process significantly influences coastal water quality and causes
active sediment load at large segments of the narrow shelf of RCBS compared to average climatic discharge conditions.</p>
      <p>As shown above, flash-flooding events influence the discharge from small
rivers to a larger extent compared to large rivers. Therefore, the annual
distribution of precipitation, in particular frequency, intensity, and time
spacing of extreme precipitation events, significantly affects the
land–ocean fluxes of freshwater, dissolved matter, and suspended matter.</p>
      <p>In particular, a steady increase in air temperature of 1.2–1.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and in annual precipitation volume of 32–164 mm was
registered at meteorological stations of RCBS in 1971–2010, which caused
climate-driven changes in the discharge regimes of rivers of the study
region. The annual frequency and duration of heavy rain events and,
therefore, the annual number of extreme river floods have also shown increasing tendency in the last 50 years (Alexeevsky et al., 2016). Moreover, maximal
annual discharge volumes increased by 1.5–4.5 times for all the rivers of
RCBS during this period. As a result, owing to these climate-driven changes,
the extreme flooding events addressed in this study tend to increase their
role in local land–ocean fluxes and in the coastal transport of freshwater,
terrigenous sediments, nutrients, and pollutants.</p>
      <p>RCBS is a densely populated area (approximately 1.1 million people) and the
most important recreational area of Russia, which is visited by more than 10
million people annually. Of the residential and visitor population, 95 %
is located at the narrow coastal area less than 10 km from the seashore;
therefore, correct evaluation of the influence of small rivers on coastal
water quality is extremely important for this region.</p>
      <p>The influence of small rivers can be also significant for many world regions
that have similar configurations of rivers flowing into the sea, i.e., close
spacing of river mouths, steep and small river basins, and frequent flash-flooding events. In particular, this configuration is typical of mountainous
coastal areas with humid climates, e.g., Chile (Saldias et al., 2012, 2016),
the southwestern coast of USA (Mertes and Warrick, 2001; Nezlin et al.,
2008), the southwestern coast of New Zealand, and the southeastern coast of
Papua New Guinea. Thus, the results obtained in this study, related to
differences in transport patterns of terrigenous sediments under
point-source and line-source discharge conditions, could be applied for many
coastal areas such as those described above.</p>
      <p>Finally, global catchment-based models, which are widely used for the
estimation of freshwater, suspended sediment, and nutrient loads, e.g., NEWS
2 (Mayorga et al., 2010) and IMAGE–GNM (Beusen et al., 2015), have
insufficient spatial resolution to reconstruct discharges from small rivers.
However, neglecting their role can result in underestimation of volumes of
related land–ocean fluxes for many coastal areas, at least on the synoptic
timescale. Therefore, this study can be useful for improvement of
quantitative assessments of global catchment-based models.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>The satellite data were downloaded from the European Space
Agency repository of the Envisat satellite data
<uri>http://merisfrs-merci-ds.eo.esa.int/merci</uri> (available after registration) and
the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service repository
<uri>ftp://cmems.isac.cnr.it</uri> (available after registration). The river discharge
data were downloaded from the Federal Service for Hydrometeorology and
Environmental Monitoring of Russia repository <uri>http://gis.vodinfo.ru/</uri>
(available after registration). The in situ data and files necessary to
reproduce the simulations are available from the authors upon request.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are grateful to many colleagues from Shirshov Oceanology
Institute for valuable support during the fieldwork and wish to thank Peter Zavialov, Nikolay Diansky, Dmitry Soloviev, Vadim Pelevin, Boris Konovalov,
Alevtina Alyukaeva, and Vladimir Belokopytov, whose data were used in this
study. The authors wish to thank the European Space Agency and the
Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service for the provided satellite
data and the Federal Service for Hydrometeorology and Environmental
Monitoring of Russia for the provided river-discharge data. This research
was funded by the Russian Ministry of Science and Education (research
project 14.W03.31.0006).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Piers Chapman<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Alexeevsky, N., Magritsky, D. V., Koltermann, K. P., Krylenko, I., and
Toropov, P.: Causes and systematics of inundations of the Krasnodar territory
on the Russian Black Sea coast, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16,
1289–1308, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1289-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-16-1289-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Balabanov, I. P., Nikiforov, S. P., and Pashkovskiy, I. S.: Imeretinskaya
lowland. Natural and geological conditions, development problems, Nedra,
Moscow, Russia, 2011 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bao, H., Huang, T. Y. L. J. C., Feng, X., Dai, M., and Kao, S. J.:
Importance of Oceanian small mountainous rivers (SMRs) in global
land-to-ocean output of lignin and modern biospheric carbon, Sci. Rep., 5,
16217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16217" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep16217</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Beusen, A. H. W., Van Beek, L. P. H., Bouwman, A. F., Mogollón, J. M., and
Middelburg, J. J.: Coupling global models for hydrology and nutrient loading
to simulate nitrogen and phosphorus retention in surface water – description
of IMAGE-GNM and analysis of performance, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 4045–4067,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-4045-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-4045-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Brodie, J., Schroeder, T., Rohde, K., Faithful, J., Masters, B., Dekker, A.,
Brando, V., and Maughan, M.: Dispersal of suspended sediments and nutrients
in the Great Barrier Reef lagoon during river-discharge events: conclusions
from satellite remote sensing and concurrent flood-plume sampling, Mar.
Freshwater Res., 61, 651–664, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/MF08030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/MF08030</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Danabaoglu, G., Yeager, S. G., Kim, W. M., Behrens, E., Bentsen, M., Bi, D.,
Biastoch, A., Bleck, R., Böning, C., Bozec, A., Canuto, V. M., Cassou,
C., Chassignet, E., Coward, A. C., Danilov, S., Diansky, N., Drange, H.,
Farneti, R., Fernandez, E., Fogli, P. G., Forget, G., Fujii, Y., Griffies,
S. M., Gusev, A., Heimbach, P., Howard, A., Ilicak, M., Jung, T, Karspeck,
A. R., Kelley, M., Large, W. G., Leboissetier, A., Lu, J., Madec, G.,
Marsland, S. J., Masina, S., Navarra, A., Nurser, A. G. J., Pirani, A.,
Romanou, A., Mélia, D. S., Samuels, B. L., Scheinert, M., Sidorenko, D.,
Sun, S., Treguier, A.-M., Tsujino, H., Uotila, P., Valcke, S., Voldoire, A.,
Wang, Q., and Yashayaev, I. :North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated
Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part II: Inter-annual to
decadal variability, Ocean Modell., 97, 65–90,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.11.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.11.007</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Diansky, N. A., Fomin, V. V., Zhokhova, N. V., and Korshenko, A. N.:
Simulations of currents and pollution transport in the coastal waters of Big
Sochi, Izv. Atmos. Oceanic Phys., 49, 611–621,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1134/s0001433813060042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/s0001433813060042</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Doerffer, R. and Schiller, H.: MERIS regional, coastal and lake case 2 water
project – atmospheric correction ATBD, Version 1.0, 18 May 2008, GKSS
Research Center, Geesthacht, Germany, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Downes, S. M., Farneti, R., Uotila, P., Griffies, S. M., Marsland, S. J.,
Bailey, D., Behrens, E., Bentsen, M., Bi, D., Biastoch, A., Böning, C.,
Bozec, A., Canuto, V. M., Chassignet, E., Danabasoglu, G., Danilov, S.,
Diansky, N., Drange, H., Fogli, P. G., Gusev, A., Howard, A., Ilicak, M.,
Jung, T., Kelley, M., Large, W. G., Leboissetier, A., Long, M., Lu, J.,
Masina, S., Mishra, A., Navarra, A, Nurser, A. G. J., Patara, L., Samuels, B.
L., Sidorenko, D., Spence, P., Tsujino, H., Wang, Q., and Yeager, S. G.: An
assessment of Southern Ocean water masses and sea ice during 1988–2007 in a
suite of interannual CORE-II simulations, Ocean Modell., 94, 67–94,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.07.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.07.022</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Emmett, R. L., Krutzikowsky, G. K., and Bentley, P.: Abundance and
distribution of pelagic piscivorous fishes in the Columbia River plume during
spring/early summer 1998–2003: relationship to oceanographic conditions,
forage fishes, and juvenile salmonids, Prog. Oceanogr., 68, 1–26,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2005.08.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2005.08.001</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Enriquez, C. E., Shapiro, G. I., Souza, A. J., and Zatsepin, A. G.:
Hydrodynamic modelling of mesoscale eddies in the Black Sea, Ocean Dyn., 55,
476–489, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-005-0031-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10236-005-0031-4</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Farneti, R., Downes, S. M., Griffies, S. M., Marsland, S. J., Behrens, E.,
Bentsen, M., Bi, D., Biastoch, A., Böning, C., Bozec, A., Canuto, V. M.,
Chassignet, E., Danabasoglu, G., Danilov, S., Diansky, N., Drange, H.,
Fogli, P. G., Gusev, A., Hallberg, R. W., Howard, A., Ilicak, M., Jung, T.,
Kelley, M., Large, W. G., Leboissetier, A., Long, M., Lu, J., Masina, S.,
Mishra, A., Navarra, A, Nurser, A. G. J., Patara, L., Samuels, B. L.,
Sidorenko, D., Tsujino, H., Uotila, P., Wang, Q., and Yeager, S. G.: An
assessment of Antarctic Circumpolar Current and Southern Ocean meridional
overturning circulation during 1958-2007 in a suite of interannual CORE-II
simulations, Ocean Modell., 93, 84–120, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.07.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.07.009</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Fong, D. A. and Geyer, W. R.: The alongshore transport of freshwater in a
surface-trapped river plume, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32, 957–972.
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;0957:TATOFI&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;0957:TATOFI&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Garvine, R. W.: Estuary plumes and fronts in shelf waters: A layer model, J.
Phys. Oceanogr., 17, 1877–1896, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1987)017&lt;1877:epafis&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1987)017&lt;1877:epafis&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Ginzburg, A. I., Kostianoy, A. G., Krivosheya, V. G., Nezlin, N. P.,
Soloviev, D. M., Stanichny, S. V., and Yakubenko, V. G.: Mesoscale eddies
and related processes in the northeastern Black Sea, J. Mar. Syst., 32,
71–90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0422-9894(00)80016-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0422-9894(00)80016-1</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Gregg, M. C. and Ozsoy, E.: Mixing on the Black Sea shelf north of the
Bosphorus, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 1869–1872, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900431" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999GL900431</ext-link>,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Hilton, R. G., Galy, A., Hovius, N., Horng, M.-J., and Chen, H.: Efficient
transport of fossil organic carbon to the ocean by steep mountain rivers: An
orogenic carbon sequestration mechanism, Geology, 39, 71–74,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/g31352.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/g31352.1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Horner-Devine, A. R., Fong, D. A., Monismith, S. G., and Maxworthy, T.:
Laboratory experiments simulating a coastal river discharge, J. Fluid Mech.,
555, 203–232, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112006008937" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/s0022112006008937</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Hrachowitz, M., Savenije, H. H. G., Blöschl, G., McDonnelld, J. J.,
Sivapalan, M., Pomeroyg, J. W., Arheimer, B., Blume, T., Clark, M. P.,
Ehret, U., Fenicia, F., Freer, J. E., Gelfan, A., Gupta, D. A., Hughes,
R. W., Hut, A., Montanari, S., Pande, D., Tetzlaff, P. A., Troch, S.,
Uhlenbrook, H. V., Wagener, T., Winsemius, H. C., Woods, R. A., Zehe, E.,
and Cudennec C.: A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB) – a
review, Hydrol. Sci. J., 58, 1198–1255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.803183" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02626667.2013.803183</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Ivanov, V. A. and Belokopytov, V. N.: Oceanography of the Black Sea,
ECOSY-Gidrofizika, Sevastopol, 17–19, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Jaoshvili, S.: River sediment and beach formation on the Black Sea coast of
Georgia, Sabchota Sakartvelo, Tbilisi, USSR, 1986 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Jaoshvili, S.: The rivers of the Black Sea, European Environmental Agency,
eds. I. Chomeriki, G. Gigineishvili, and A. Kordzadze, Technical Report No.
71, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Johnson, M., Proshutinsky, A., Aksenov, Y., Nguyen, A. T., Lindsay, R.,
Haas, C., Zhang, J., Diansky, N., Kwok, R., Maslowski, W., Häkkinen, S.,
Ashik, I., and Cuevas, B.: Evaluation of Arctic sea ice thickness simulated
by Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison Project models, J. Geophys. Res., 117,
C00D13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007257" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JC007257</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Kniskern, T. A., Warrick, J. A., Farnsworth, K. L., Wheatcroft, R. A., and
Goni, M. A.: Coherence of river and ocean conditions along the US West Coast
during storms, Cont. Shelf Res., 31, 789–805,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2011.01.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csr.2011.01.012</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Korotaev, G., Oguz, T., Nikiforov, A., and Koblinsky, C.: Seasonal,
interannual, and mesoscale variability of the Black Sea upper layer
circulation derived from altimeter data, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 3122,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jc001508" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jc001508</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Korotenko, K. A., Osadchiev, A. A., Zavialov, P. O., Kao, R.-C., and Ding,
C.-F.: Effects of bottom topography on dynamics of river discharges in tidal
regions: case study of twin plumes in Taiwan Strait, Ocean Sci., 10,
863–879, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-863-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-10-863-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Korotkina, O. A., Zavialov P. O., and Osadchiev A. A.: Submesoscale
variability of the current and wind fields in the coastal region of Sochi,
Oceanology, 51, 745–754, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1134/s0001437011050109" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/s0001437011050109</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Korotkina, O. A., Zavialov P. O., and Osadchiev A. A.: Synoptic variability
of currents in the coastal waters of Sochi, Oceanology, 54, 545–556,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1134/s0001437014040079" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/s0001437014040079</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Kubryakov, A. A. and Stanichny, S. V.: Mesoscale eddies in the Black Sea from
satellite altimetry data, Oceanology, 55, 56–67,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1134/s0001437015010105" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/s0001437015010105</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Kubryakov, A. A. and Stanichny, S. V.: Seasonal and interannual variability
of the Black Sea eddies and its dependence on characteristics of the
large-scale circulation, Deep Sea Res. Part I, 97, 80–91,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2014.12.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.dsr.2014.12.002</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Mayorga, E., Seitzinger, S. P., Harrison, J. A., Dumont, E., Beusen, A. H.,
Bouwman, A. F., Fekete, B. M., Kroeze, C., and Van Drecht, G.: Global
nutrient export from WaterSheds 2 (NEWS 2): model development and
implementation, Environ. Modell. Software, 25, 837–853,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.01.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.01.007</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Mertes, L. A. K. and Warrick, J. A.: Measuring flood output from 110 coastal
watersheds in California with field measurements and SeaWiFS, Geology, 29,
659–662,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029&lt;0659:mfofcw&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029&lt;0659:mfofcw&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Meybeck, M., Laroche, L., Dürr, H. H., and Syvitski, J. P. M.: Global
variability of daily total suspended solids and their fluxes in rivers,
Global Planet. Change, 39, 65–93, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8181(03)00018-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0921-8181(03)00018-3</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Milliman, J. D. and Syvitski, J. P. M.: Geomorphic-tectonic control of
sediment discharge to the ocean: the importance of small mountainous rivers,
J. Geol., 100, 525–544, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1086/629606" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1086/629606</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Milliman, J. D., Lin, S. W., Kao, S. J., Liu, J. P., Liu, C. S., Chiu, J.
K., and Lin, Y. C.: Short-term changes in seafloor character due to
flood-derived hyperpycnal discharge: typhoon Mindulle, Taiwan, July 2004,
Geology, 35, 779–782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1130/g23760a.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1130/g23760a.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Nardelli, B. B., Colella, S., Santoleri, R., Guarracino, M., and Kholod, A.:
A re-analysis of Black Sea Surface Temperature, J. Mar. Sys.., 79, 50–64,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.07.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.07.001</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Nardelli, B. B., Tronconi, C., Pisano, A., and Santoleri, R.: High and
Ultra-High resolution processing of satellite Sea Surface Temperature data
over Southern European Seas in the framework of MyOcean project, Rem. Sens.
Env., 129, 1–16,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.10.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2012.10.012</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Nezlin, N. P., DiGiacomo, P. M., Diehl, D. W., Jones, B. H., Johnson, S. C.,
Mengel, M. J., Reifel, K. M., Warrick, J. A., and Wang, M.: Stormwater plume
detection by MODIS imagery in the southern California coastal ocean,
Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci., 80, 141–152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.07.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2008.07.012</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>O'Donnell J.: The formation and fate of a river plume: A numerical model, J.
Phys. Oceanogr., 20, 551–569,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1990)020&lt;0551:tfafoa&gt; 2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1990)020&lt;0551:tfafoa&gt; 2.0.co;2</ext-link>,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Oguz, T., La Violette, P. E., and Unluata, U.: The upper layer circulation of
the Black Sea: its variability as inferred from hydrographic and satellite
observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 97, 12569–12584,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92jc00812" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92jc00812</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Oguz, T., Latun, V. S., Latif, M. A., Vladimirov, V. V., Sur, H. I., Markov,
A. A., Ozsoy, E., Kotovshchikov B. B., Eremeev, V. V., and Unluata, U.:
Circulation in the surface and intermediate layers of the Black Sea, Deep Sea
Res. Part I, 40, 1597–1612, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(93)90018-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0967-0637(93)90018-X</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Oguz, T., Malanotte-Rizzoli, P., and Aubrey, D.: Wind and thermohaline
circulation of the Black Sea driven by yearly mean climatological forcing, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 100, 6845–6863, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JC00022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JC00022</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Osadchiev A. A.: A method for quantifying freshwater discharge rates from
satellite observations and Lagrangian numerical modeling of river plumes,
Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 085009, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/085009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/085009</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Osadchiev, A. A., Korotenko, K. A., Zavialov, P. O., Chiang, W.-S., and Liu,
C.-C.: Transport and bottom accumulation of fine river sediments under
typhoon conditions and associated submarine landslides: case study of the
Peinan River, Taiwan, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 41–54,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-41-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-16-41-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Osadchiev, A. A. and Zavialov, P. O.: Lagrangian model for surface-advected
river plume, Cont. Shelf Res., 58, 96–106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2013.03.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csr.2013.03.010</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Pacanowsky, R. C. and Philander, G.: Parameterization of vertical mixing in
numerical models of the tropical ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 11, 1442–1451,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1981)011&lt;1443:povmin&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0485(1981)011&lt;1443:povmin&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Palmer, S. C., Pelevin, V. V., Goncharenko, I., Kovacs, A. W., Zlinszky, A.,
Presing, M., Horvath, H., Nicolas-Perea, V., Balzter, H., and Toth, V. R.:
Ultraviolet Fluorescence LiDAR (UFL) as a measurement tool for water quality
parameters in turbid lake conditions, Remote Sensing, 5, 4405–4422,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5094405" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs5094405</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Rabalais, N. N.: Eutrophication of estuarine and coastal ecosystems,
Environmental Microbiology, 2nd edition, edited by: Mitchell, R. and Gu,
J.-D., Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 115–134, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Saldias, G. S., Sobarzo, M., Largier, J., Moffat, C., and Letelier, R.:
Seasonal variability of turbid river plumes off central Chile based on
high-resolution MODIS imagery, Remote Sens. Env., 123, 220–233,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.03.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2012.03.010</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Saldias, G. S., Largier, J. L., Mendes, R., Pérez-Santos, I., Vargas, C.
A., and Sobarzo, M.: Satellite-measured interannual variability of turbid
river plumes off central-southern Chile: Spatial patterns and the influence
of climate variability, Prog. Oceanogr., 146, 212–222,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2016.07.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2016.07.007</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Stanev, E. V., Roussenov, V. M., Rachev, N. H., and Staneva, J. V.: Sea
response to atmospheric variability. Model study for the Black Sea, J. Mar.
Syst., 6, 241–267, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-7963(94)00026-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0924-7963(94)00026-8</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Staneva, J. V., Dietrich, D. E., Stanev, E. V., and Bowman, M. J.: Rim
current and coastal eddy mechanisms in an eddy-resolving Black Sea general
circulation model, J. Mar. Syst., 31, 137–157,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-7963(01)00050-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0924-7963(01)00050-1</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Titov, V. B.: Characteristics of the Main Black Sea Current and near-shore
anticyclonic eddies in the Russian sector of the Black Sea, Oceanology, 42,
637–645, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Volodin, E. M., Diansky, N. A., and Gusev, A. V.: Simulating present-day
climate with the INMCM4.0 coupled model of the atmospheric and oceanic
general circulations, Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys., 46, 414–431,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1134/s000143381004002x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/s000143381004002x</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Vorosmarty, C., Askew, A., Grabs, W., Barry, R. G., Birkett, C., Doll, P.,
Goodison, B., Hall, A., Jenne, R., Kitaev, L., Landwehr, J., Keeler, M.,
Leavesley, G., Schaake, J., Strzepek, K., Sundarvel, S. S., Takeuchi, K.,
and Webster, F.: Global water data: a newly endangered species, Eos, Trans.
Amer. Geophys. Union., 82, 54–58, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/01eo00031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/01eo00031</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Warrick, J. A. and Farnsworth, K. L.: Coastal river plumes: collisions and
coalescence, Prog. Oceanogr., 151, 245–260,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2016.11.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.pocean.2016.11.008</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Wheatcroft, R. A., Goni, M. A., Hatten, J. A., Pasternack, G. B., and
Warrick, J. A.: The role of effective discharge in the ocean delivery of
particulate organic carbon by small, mountainous river systems, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 55, 161–171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0161" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0161</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Zalesny, V. B., Diansky, N. A., Fomin, V. V., Moshonkin, S. N., and
Demyshev, S. G.: Numerical model of the circulation of the Black Sea and the
Sea of Azov, Rus. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling, 27, 95–112,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1515/rnam-2012-0006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1515/rnam-2012-0006</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Zalesny, V. B., Gusev, A. V., and Moshonkin, S. N.: Numerical model of the
hydrodynamics of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov with variational
initialization of temperature and salinity, Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys., 49,
642–658, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433813060133" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/S0001433813060133</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Zalesny, V. B., Gusev, A. V., Lukyanova, A. N., and Fomin, V. V.: Numerical
modelling of sea currents and tidal waves, Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math.
Modelling, 31, 115–125, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1515/rnam-2016-0012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1515/rnam-2016-0012</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Zalesny, V. B., Gusev, A. V., and Agoshkov, V. I.: Modeling Black Sea
circulation with high resolution in the coastal zone, Izv., Atmos. Ocean.
Phys., 52, 277–293, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433816030142" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/S0001433816030142</ext-link>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Zatsepin, A. G., Ginzburg, A. I., Kostianoy, A. G., Kremenetskiy, V. V.,
Krivosheya, V. G., Poulain, P.- M., and Stanichny, S. V.: Observation of
Black Sea mesoscale eddies and associated horizontal mixing, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 1–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jc001390" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002jc001390</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Zavialov, P. O., Makkaveev, P. N., Konovalov, B. V., Osadchiev, A. A.,
Khlebopashev, P. V., Pelevin, V. V., Grabovskiy, A. B., Izhitskiy, A. S.,
Goncharenko, I. V., Soloviev, D. M., and Polukhin, A. A.: Hydrophysical and
hydrochemical characteristics of the sea areas adjacent to the estuaries of
small rivers if the Russian coast of the Black Sea, Oceanology, 54,
265–280, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1134/s0001437014030151" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/s0001437014030151</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, M.-J., Shen, Z.-L., and Yu, R.-C.: Responses of a coastal
phytoplankton community to increased nutrient input from the Changjiang
(Yangtze) River, Cont. Shelf Res., 28, 1483–1489,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2007.02.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csr.2007.02.009</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Small river plumes off the northeastern coast of the Black Sea under average climatic and flooding discharge conditions</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">This study focuses on the impact of discharges of small
rivers on the delivery and fate of fluvial water and suspended matter at the
northeastern part of the Black Sea under different local precipitation
conditions. Several dozens of mountainous rivers flow into the sea at the
study region, and most of them, except for several of the largest, have
little annual runoff and affect adjacent coastal waters to a limited extent
under average climatic conditions. However, the discharges of these small
rivers are characterized by a quick response to precipitation events and can
significantly increase during and shortly after heavy rains, which are
frequent in the considered area. The delivery and fate of fluvial water and
terrigenous sediments at the study region, under average climatic and
rain-induced flooding conditions, were explored and compared using in situ
data, satellite imagery, and numerical modeling. It was shown that the
point-source spread of continental discharge dominated by several large
rivers under average climatic conditions can change to the line-source
discharge from numerous small rivers situated along the coast in response to
heavy rains. The intense line-source runoff of water and suspended sediments
forms a geostrophic alongshore current of turbid and freshened water, which
induces the intense transport of suspended and dissolved constituents
discharged with river waters in a northwestern direction. This process
significantly influences water quality and causes active sediment load at
large segments of the narrow shelf at the northeastern part of the Black
Sea compared to average climatic discharge conditions.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Alexeevsky, N., Magritsky, D. V., Koltermann, K. P., Krylenko, I., and
Toropov, P.: Causes and systematics of inundations of the Krasnodar territory
on the Russian Black Sea coast, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16,
1289–1308, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1289-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/nhess-16-1289-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Balabanov, I. P., Nikiforov, S. P., and Pashkovskiy, I. S.: Imeretinskaya
lowland. Natural and geological conditions, development problems, Nedra,
Moscow, Russia, 2011 (in Russian).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bao, H., Huang, T. Y. L. J. C., Feng, X., Dai, M., and Kao, S. J.:
Importance of Oceanian small mountainous rivers (SMRs) in global
land-to-ocean output of lignin and modern biospheric carbon, Sci. Rep., 5,
16217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16217" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/srep16217</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Beusen, A. H. W., Van Beek, L. P. H., Bouwman, A. F., Mogollón, J. M., and
Middelburg, J. J.: Coupling global models for hydrology and nutrient loading
to simulate nitrogen and phosphorus retention in surface water – description
of IMAGE-GNM and analysis of performance, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 4045–4067,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-4045-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/gmd-8-4045-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Brodie, J., Schroeder, T., Rohde, K., Faithful, J., Masters, B., Dekker, A.,
Brando, V., and Maughan, M.: Dispersal of suspended sediments and nutrients
in the Great Barrier Reef lagoon during river-discharge events: conclusions
from satellite remote sensing and concurrent flood-plume sampling, Mar.
Freshwater Res., 61, 651–664, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/MF08030" target="_blank">doi:10.1071/MF08030</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Danabaoglu, G., Yeager, S. G., Kim, W. M., Behrens, E., Bentsen, M., Bi, D.,
Biastoch, A., Bleck, R., Böning, C., Bozec, A., Canuto, V. M., Cassou,
C., Chassignet, E., Coward, A. C., Danilov, S., Diansky, N., Drange, H.,
Farneti, R., Fernandez, E., Fogli, P. G., Forget, G., Fujii, Y., Griffies,
S. M., Gusev, A., Heimbach, P., Howard, A., Ilicak, M., Jung, T, Karspeck,
A. R., Kelley, M., Large, W. G., Leboissetier, A., Lu, J., Madec, G.,
Marsland, S. J., Masina, S., Navarra, A., Nurser, A. G. J., Pirani, A.,
Romanou, A., Mélia, D. S., Samuels, B. L., Scheinert, M., Sidorenko, D.,
Sun, S., Treguier, A.-M., Tsujino, H., Uotila, P., Valcke, S., Voldoire, A.,
Wang, Q., and Yashayaev, I. :North Atlantic simulations in Coordinated
Ocean-ice Reference Experiments phase II (CORE-II). Part II: Inter-annual to
decadal variability, Ocean Modell., 97, 65–90,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.11.007" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.11.007</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Diansky, N. A., Fomin, V. V., Zhokhova, N. V., and Korshenko, A. N.:
Simulations of currents and pollution transport in the coastal waters of Big
Sochi, Izv. Atmos. Oceanic Phys., 49, 611–621,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/s0001433813060042" target="_blank">doi:10.1134/s0001433813060042</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Doerffer, R. and Schiller, H.: MERIS regional, coastal and lake case 2 water
project – atmospheric correction ATBD, Version 1.0, 18 May 2008, GKSS
Research Center, Geesthacht, Germany, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Downes, S. M., Farneti, R., Uotila, P., Griffies, S. M., Marsland, S. J.,
Bailey, D., Behrens, E., Bentsen, M., Bi, D., Biastoch, A., Böning, C.,
Bozec, A., Canuto, V. M., Chassignet, E., Danabasoglu, G., Danilov, S.,
Diansky, N., Drange, H., Fogli, P. G., Gusev, A., Howard, A., Ilicak, M.,
Jung, T., Kelley, M., Large, W. G., Leboissetier, A., Long, M., Lu, J.,
Masina, S., Mishra, A., Navarra, A, Nurser, A. G. J., Patara, L., Samuels, B.
L., Sidorenko, D., Spence, P., Tsujino, H., Wang, Q., and Yeager, S. G.: An
assessment of Southern Ocean water masses and sea ice during 1988–2007 in a
suite of interannual CORE-II simulations, Ocean Modell., 94, 67–94,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.07.022" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.07.022</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Emmett, R. L., Krutzikowsky, G. K., and Bentley, P.: Abundance and
distribution of pelagic piscivorous fishes in the Columbia River plume during
spring/early summer 1998–2003: relationship to oceanographic conditions,
forage fishes, and juvenile salmonids, Prog. Oceanogr., 68, 1–26,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2005.08.001" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2005.08.001</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Enriquez, C. E., Shapiro, G. I., Souza, A. J., and Zatsepin, A. G.:
Hydrodynamic modelling of mesoscale eddies in the Black Sea, Ocean Dyn., 55,
476–489, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-005-0031-4" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s10236-005-0031-4</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Farneti, R., Downes, S. M., Griffies, S. M., Marsland, S. J., Behrens, E.,
Bentsen, M., Bi, D., Biastoch, A., Böning, C., Bozec, A., Canuto, V. M.,
Chassignet, E., Danabasoglu, G., Danilov, S., Diansky, N., Drange, H.,
Fogli, P. G., Gusev, A., Hallberg, R. W., Howard, A., Ilicak, M., Jung, T.,
Kelley, M., Large, W. G., Leboissetier, A., Long, M., Lu, J., Masina, S.,
Mishra, A., Navarra, A, Nurser, A. G. J., Patara, L., Samuels, B. L.,
Sidorenko, D., Tsujino, H., Uotila, P., Wang, Q., and Yeager, S. G.: An
assessment of Antarctic Circumpolar Current and Southern Ocean meridional
overturning circulation during 1958-2007 in a suite of interannual CORE-II
simulations, Ocean Modell., 93, 84–120, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.07.009" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.07.009</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Fong, D. A. and Geyer, W. R.: The alongshore transport of freshwater in a
surface-trapped river plume, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 32, 957–972.
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;0957:TATOFI&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0485(2002)032&lt;0957:TATOFI&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Garvine, R. W.: Estuary plumes and fronts in shelf waters: A layer model, J.
Phys. Oceanogr., 17, 1877–1896, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1987)017&lt;1877:epafis&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1987)017&lt;1877:epafis&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Ginzburg, A. I., Kostianoy, A. G., Krivosheya, V. G., Nezlin, N. P.,
Soloviev, D. M., Stanichny, S. V., and Yakubenko, V. G.: Mesoscale eddies
and related processes in the northeastern Black Sea, J. Mar. Syst., 32,
71–90, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0422-9894(00)80016-1" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/s0422-9894(00)80016-1</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Gregg, M. C. and Ozsoy, E.: Mixing on the Black Sea shelf north of the
Bosphorus, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 1869–1872, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900431" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/1999GL900431</a>,
1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Hilton, R. G., Galy, A., Hovius, N., Horng, M.-J., and Chen, H.: Efficient
transport of fossil organic carbon to the ocean by steep mountain rivers: An
orogenic carbon sequestration mechanism, Geology, 39, 71–74,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/g31352.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1130/g31352.1</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Horner-Devine, A. R., Fong, D. A., Monismith, S. G., and Maxworthy, T.:
Laboratory experiments simulating a coastal river discharge, J. Fluid Mech.,
555, 203–232, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112006008937" target="_blank">doi:10.1017/s0022112006008937</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Hrachowitz, M., Savenije, H. H. G., Blöschl, G., McDonnelld, J. J.,
Sivapalan, M., Pomeroyg, J. W., Arheimer, B., Blume, T., Clark, M. P.,
Ehret, U., Fenicia, F., Freer, J. E., Gelfan, A., Gupta, D. A., Hughes,
R. W., Hut, A., Montanari, S., Pande, D., Tetzlaff, P. A., Troch, S.,
Uhlenbrook, H. V., Wagener, T., Winsemius, H. C., Woods, R. A., Zehe, E.,
and Cudennec C.: A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB) – a
review, Hydrol. Sci. J., 58, 1198–1255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.803183" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.803183</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Ivanov, V. A. and Belokopytov, V. N.: Oceanography of the Black Sea,
ECOSY-Gidrofizika, Sevastopol, 17–19, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Jaoshvili, S.: River sediment and beach formation on the Black Sea coast of
Georgia, Sabchota Sakartvelo, Tbilisi, USSR, 1986 (in Russian).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Jaoshvili, S.: The rivers of the Black Sea, European Environmental Agency,
eds. I. Chomeriki, G. Gigineishvili, and A. Kordzadze, Technical Report No.
71, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, M., Proshutinsky, A., Aksenov, Y., Nguyen, A. T., Lindsay, R.,
Haas, C., Zhang, J., Diansky, N., Kwok, R., Maslowski, W., Häkkinen, S.,
Ashik, I., and Cuevas, B.: Evaluation of Arctic sea ice thickness simulated
by Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison Project models, J. Geophys. Res., 117,
C00D13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007257" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011JC007257</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Kniskern, T. A., Warrick, J. A., Farnsworth, K. L., Wheatcroft, R. A., and
Goni, M. A.: Coherence of river and ocean conditions along the US West Coast
during storms, Cont. Shelf Res., 31, 789–805,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2011.01.012" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.csr.2011.01.012</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Korotaev, G., Oguz, T., Nikiforov, A., and Koblinsky, C.: Seasonal,
interannual, and mesoscale variability of the Black Sea upper layer
circulation derived from altimeter data, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 3122,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jc001508" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002jc001508</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Korotenko, K. A., Osadchiev, A. A., Zavialov, P. O., Kao, R.-C., and Ding,
C.-F.: Effects of bottom topography on dynamics of river discharges in tidal
regions: case study of twin plumes in Taiwan Strait, Ocean Sci., 10,
863–879, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-10-863-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/os-10-863-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Korotkina, O. A., Zavialov P. O., and Osadchiev A. A.: Submesoscale
variability of the current and wind fields in the coastal region of Sochi,
Oceanology, 51, 745–754, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/s0001437011050109" target="_blank">doi:10.1134/s0001437011050109</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Korotkina, O. A., Zavialov P. O., and Osadchiev A. A.: Synoptic variability
of currents in the coastal waters of Sochi, Oceanology, 54, 545–556,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/s0001437014040079" target="_blank">doi:10.1134/s0001437014040079</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Kubryakov, A. A. and Stanichny, S. V.: Mesoscale eddies in the Black Sea from
satellite altimetry data, Oceanology, 55, 56–67,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/s0001437015010105" target="_blank">doi:10.1134/s0001437015010105</a>, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kubryakov, A. A. and Stanichny, S. V.: Seasonal and interannual variability
of the Black Sea eddies and its dependence on characteristics of the
large-scale circulation, Deep Sea Res. Part I, 97, 80–91,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2014.12.002" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.dsr.2014.12.002</a>, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Mayorga, E., Seitzinger, S. P., Harrison, J. A., Dumont, E., Beusen, A. H.,
Bouwman, A. F., Fekete, B. M., Kroeze, C., and Van Drecht, G.: Global
nutrient export from WaterSheds 2 (NEWS 2): model development and
implementation, Environ. Modell. Software, 25, 837–853,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.01.007" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.01.007</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Mertes, L. A. K. and Warrick, J. A.: Measuring flood output from 110 coastal
watersheds in California with field measurements and SeaWiFS, Geology, 29,
659–662,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029&lt;0659:mfofcw&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029&lt;0659:mfofcw&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Meybeck, M., Laroche, L., Dürr, H. H., and Syvitski, J. P. M.: Global
variability of daily total suspended solids and their fluxes in rivers,
Global Planet. Change, 39, 65–93, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8181(03)00018-3" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/s0921-8181(03)00018-3</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Milliman, J. D. and Syvitski, J. P. M.: Geomorphic-tectonic control of
sediment discharge to the ocean: the importance of small mountainous rivers,
J. Geol., 100, 525–544, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1086/629606" target="_blank">doi:10.1086/629606</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Milliman, J. D., Lin, S. W., Kao, S. J., Liu, J. P., Liu, C. S., Chiu, J.
K., and Lin, Y. C.: Short-term changes in seafloor character due to
flood-derived hyperpycnal discharge: typhoon Mindulle, Taiwan, July 2004,
Geology, 35, 779–782, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1130/g23760a.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1130/g23760a.1</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Nardelli, B. B., Colella, S., Santoleri, R., Guarracino, M., and Kholod, A.:
A re-analysis of Black Sea Surface Temperature, J. Mar. Sys.., 79, 50–64,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.07.001" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.07.001</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Nardelli, B. B., Tronconi, C., Pisano, A., and Santoleri, R.: High and
Ultra-High resolution processing of satellite Sea Surface Temperature data
over Southern European Seas in the framework of MyOcean project, Rem. Sens.
Env., 129, 1–16,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.10.012" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.10.012</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Nezlin, N. P., DiGiacomo, P. M., Diehl, D. W., Jones, B. H., Johnson, S. C.,
Mengel, M. J., Reifel, K. M., Warrick, J. A., and Wang, M.: Stormwater plume
detection by MODIS imagery in the southern California coastal ocean,
Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci., 80, 141–152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2008.07.012" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2008.07.012</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
O'Donnell J.: The formation and fate of a river plume: A numerical model, J.
Phys. Oceanogr., 20, 551–569,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1990)020&lt;0551:tfafoa&gt; 2.0.co;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1990)020&lt;0551:tfafoa&gt; 2.0.co;2</a>,
1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Oguz, T., La Violette, P. E., and Unluata, U.: The upper layer circulation of
the Black Sea: its variability as inferred from hydrographic and satellite
observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 97, 12569–12584,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92jc00812" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/92jc00812</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Oguz, T., Latun, V. S., Latif, M. A., Vladimirov, V. V., Sur, H. I., Markov,
A. A., Ozsoy, E., Kotovshchikov B. B., Eremeev, V. V., and Unluata, U.:
Circulation in the surface and intermediate layers of the Black Sea, Deep Sea
Res. Part I, 40, 1597–1612, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(93)90018-X" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0967-0637(93)90018-X</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Oguz, T., Malanotte-Rizzoli, P., and Aubrey, D.: Wind and thermohaline
circulation of the Black Sea driven by yearly mean climatological forcing, J.
Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 100, 6845–6863, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JC00022" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/95JC00022</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Osadchiev A. A.: A method for quantifying freshwater discharge rates from
satellite observations and Lagrangian numerical modeling of river plumes,
Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 085009, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/085009" target="_blank">doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/085009</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Osadchiev, A. A., Korotenko, K. A., Zavialov, P. O., Chiang, W.-S., and Liu,
C.-C.: Transport and bottom accumulation of fine river sediments under
typhoon conditions and associated submarine landslides: case study of the
Peinan River, Taiwan, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, 41–54,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-41-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/nhess-16-41-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Osadchiev, A. A. and Zavialov, P. O.: Lagrangian model for surface-advected
river plume, Cont. Shelf Res., 58, 96–106, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2013.03.010" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.csr.2013.03.010</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Pacanowsky, R. C. and Philander, G.: Parameterization of vertical mixing in
numerical models of the tropical ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 11, 1442–1451,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1981)011&lt;1443:povmin&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/1520-0485(1981)011&lt;1443:povmin&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Palmer, S. C., Pelevin, V. V., Goncharenko, I., Kovacs, A. W., Zlinszky, A.,
Presing, M., Horvath, H., Nicolas-Perea, V., Balzter, H., and Toth, V. R.:
Ultraviolet Fluorescence LiDAR (UFL) as a measurement tool for water quality
parameters in turbid lake conditions, Remote Sensing, 5, 4405–4422,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5094405" target="_blank">doi:10.3390/rs5094405</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Rabalais, N. N.: Eutrophication of estuarine and coastal ecosystems,
Environmental Microbiology, 2nd edition, edited by: Mitchell, R. and Gu,
J.-D., Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 115–134, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Saldias, G. S., Sobarzo, M., Largier, J., Moffat, C., and Letelier, R.:
Seasonal variability of turbid river plumes off central Chile based on
high-resolution MODIS imagery, Remote Sens. Env., 123, 220–233,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.03.010" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.03.010</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Saldias, G. S., Largier, J. L., Mendes, R., Pérez-Santos, I., Vargas, C.
A., and Sobarzo, M.: Satellite-measured interannual variability of turbid
river plumes off central-southern Chile: Spatial patterns and the influence
of climate variability, Prog. Oceanogr., 146, 212–222,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2016.07.007" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2016.07.007</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Stanev, E. V., Roussenov, V. M., Rachev, N. H., and Staneva, J. V.: Sea
response to atmospheric variability. Model study for the Black Sea, J. Mar.
Syst., 6, 241–267, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-7963(94)00026-8" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/0924-7963(94)00026-8</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Staneva, J. V., Dietrich, D. E., Stanev, E. V., and Bowman, M. J.: Rim
current and coastal eddy mechanisms in an eddy-resolving Black Sea general
circulation model, J. Mar. Syst., 31, 137–157,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-7963(01)00050-1" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/s0924-7963(01)00050-1</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Titov, V. B.: Characteristics of the Main Black Sea Current and near-shore
anticyclonic eddies in the Russian sector of the Black Sea, Oceanology, 42,
637–645, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Volodin, E. M., Diansky, N. A., and Gusev, A. V.: Simulating present-day
climate with the INMCM4.0 coupled model of the atmospheric and oceanic
general circulations, Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys., 46, 414–431,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/s000143381004002x" target="_blank">doi:10.1134/s000143381004002x</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Vorosmarty, C., Askew, A., Grabs, W., Barry, R. G., Birkett, C., Doll, P.,
Goodison, B., Hall, A., Jenne, R., Kitaev, L., Landwehr, J., Keeler, M.,
Leavesley, G., Schaake, J., Strzepek, K., Sundarvel, S. S., Takeuchi, K.,
and Webster, F.: Global water data: a newly endangered species, Eos, Trans.
Amer. Geophys. Union., 82, 54–58, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/01eo00031" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/01eo00031</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Warrick, J. A. and Farnsworth, K. L.: Coastal river plumes: collisions and
coalescence, Prog. Oceanogr., 151, 245–260,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2016.11.008" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2016.11.008</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Wheatcroft, R. A., Goni, M. A., Hatten, J. A., Pasternack, G. B., and
Warrick, J. A.: The role of effective discharge in the ocean delivery of
particulate organic carbon by small, mountainous river systems, Limnol.
Oceanogr., 55, 161–171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0161" target="_blank">doi:10.4319/lo.2010.55.1.0161</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Zalesny, V. B., Diansky, N. A., Fomin, V. V., Moshonkin, S. N., and
Demyshev, S. G.: Numerical model of the circulation of the Black Sea and the
Sea of Azov, Rus. J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling, 27, 95–112,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/rnam-2012-0006" target="_blank">doi:10.1515/rnam-2012-0006</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Zalesny, V. B., Gusev, A. V., and Moshonkin, S. N.: Numerical model of the
hydrodynamics of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov with variational
initialization of temperature and salinity, Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys., 49,
642–658, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433813060133" target="_blank">doi:10.1134/S0001433813060133</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Zalesny, V. B., Gusev, A. V., Lukyanova, A. N., and Fomin, V. V.: Numerical
modelling of sea currents and tidal waves, Russ. J. Numer. Anal. Math.
Modelling, 31, 115–125, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/rnam-2016-0012" target="_blank">doi:10.1515/rnam-2016-0012</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Zalesny, V. B., Gusev, A. V., and Agoshkov, V. I.: Modeling Black Sea
circulation with high resolution in the coastal zone, Izv., Atmos. Ocean.
Phys., 52, 277–293, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433816030142" target="_blank">doi:10.1134/S0001433816030142</a>, 2016b.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Zatsepin, A. G., Ginzburg, A. I., Kostianoy, A. G., Kremenetskiy, V. V.,
Krivosheya, V. G., Poulain, P.- M., and Stanichny, S. V.: Observation of
Black Sea mesoscale eddies and associated horizontal mixing, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 1–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jc001390" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002jc001390</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Zavialov, P. O., Makkaveev, P. N., Konovalov, B. V., Osadchiev, A. A.,
Khlebopashev, P. V., Pelevin, V. V., Grabovskiy, A. B., Izhitskiy, A. S.,
Goncharenko, I. V., Soloviev, D. M., and Polukhin, A. A.: Hydrophysical and
hydrochemical characteristics of the sea areas adjacent to the estuaries of
small rivers if the Russian coast of the Black Sea, Oceanology, 54,
265–280, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/s0001437014030151" target="_blank">doi:10.1134/s0001437014030151</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, M.-J., Shen, Z.-L., and Yu, R.-C.: Responses of a coastal
phytoplankton community to increased nutrient input from the Changjiang
(Yangtze) River, Cont. Shelf Res., 28, 1483–1489,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2007.02.009" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.csr.2007.02.009</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
