<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">OS</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Ocean Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">OS</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Ocean Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1812-0792</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/os-12-861-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Observed El Niño conditions in the eastern<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> tropical Pacific in October
2015</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Observed El Ni\~{n}o conditions in the eastern tropical Pacific in October
2015}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{L.~Stramma et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Stramma</surname><given-names>Lothar</given-names></name>
          <email>lstramma@geomar.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1391-4808</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Fischer</surname><given-names>Tim</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7025-1129</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Grundle</surname><given-names>Damian S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Krahmann</surname><given-names>Gerd</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bange</surname><given-names>Hermann W.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4053-1394</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Marandino</surname><given-names>Christa A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker
Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Bermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences (BIOS), 17 Biological
Station, St George's GE 01, Bermuda</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Lothar Stramma (lstramma@geomar.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>4</day><month>July</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>861</fpage><lpage>873</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>11</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>24</day><month>March</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day><month>June</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://os.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://os.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>A strong El Niño developed in early 2015. Measurements from a research
cruise on the R/V <italic>Sonne</italic> in October 2015 near the Equator east of the
Galapagos Islands and off the shelf of Peru are used to investigate changes
related to El Niño in the upper ocean in comparison with earlier cruises
in this region. At the Equator at 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, a clear temperature
increase leading to lower densities in the upper 350 m had developed in
October 2015, despite a concurrent salinity increase from 40 to 350 m. Lower
nutrient concentrations were also present in the upper 200 m, and higher
oxygen concentrations were observed between 40 and 130 m. In the equatorial
current field, the Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC) east of the Galapagos
Islands almost disappeared in October 2015, with a transport of only 0.02 Sv
in the equatorial channel between 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, and a weak
current band of 0.78 Sv located between 1 and 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. Such
near-disappearances of the EUC in the eastern Pacific seem to occur only
during strong El Niño events. Off the Peruvian shelf at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, characteristics of upwelling were different as warm,
saline, and oxygen-rich water was upwelled. At <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, the upwelling of cold, low-salinity, and oxygen-poor
water was still active at the easternmost stations of these three sections,
while further west on these sections a transition to El Niño conditions
appeared. Although from early 2015 the El Niño was strong, the October
measurements in the eastern tropical Pacific only showed developing El
Niño water mass distributions. In particular, the oxygen distribution
indicated the ongoing transition from “typical” to El Niño conditions
progressing southward along the Peruvian shelf.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) cycle of alternating warm El
Niño and cold La Niña events is the dominant year-to-year climate
signal on earth. ENSO originates in the tropical Pacific through interaction
between the ocean and the atmosphere, but its environmental and socioeconomic
impacts are felt worldwide (McPhaden et al., 2006). In the eastern tropical
South Pacific, El Niño events strongly influence the commercial fishery
and weather and impact on the economics and living conditions.</p>
      <p>The strongest El Niño events since 1950 were observed in the years
1982/83 and 1997/98, the latter also referred to as “the climate event of
the twentieth century” (Changnon, 2000). Climate models suggest a doubling
in the occurrences of extreme El Niño events in the future in response to
greenhouse warming (Cai et al., 2015). In early 2015, an El Niño with
strength similar to the 1997/98 El Niño developed. Sea surface
temperature anomalies were strongest along the Equator and the tropical North
Pacific, while the development of a temperature anomaly in the eastern
tropical Pacific off Peru was, according to NOAA's “ENSO diagnostic
discussion archive”, strong in April and May, and then weakened and
intensified again from August to October 2015.</p>
      <p>El Niño dynamics modulate near-surface temperature, salinity, and
density, as well as the mixed layer depth, oxycline depth, and the vertical
extent of the low oxygen layer (e.g., Fuenzalida et al., 2009). In the
eastern Pacific, ENSO variability is most pronounced along the Equator and
the coasts of Ecuador and Peru (Wang and Fiedler, 2006), but also off Chile
(e.g., Ulloa et al., 2001). Weaker trade winds during El Niño conditions
result in a weaker equatorial circulation with a generally observed weakening
or disappearance of the Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC) (Kessler and McPhaden,
1995; Johnson et al., 2002). During the height of an El Niño event, the
EUC episodically disappears in the western and central Pacific and partially
reverses (Firing et al., 1983; McPhaden et al., 1990; Johnson et al., 2000;
Izumo, 2005), while in the eastern Pacific, episodic disappearance of the EUC
seems rare (Halpern, 1987; McPhaden and Hayes, 1990; Seidel and Giese, 1999;
Johnson et al., 2000; Izumo, 2005). El Niño events lead to a pronounced
eastward extension of the western Pacific warm pool and to a development of
atmospheric convection, and hence a rainfall increase, in the usually cold
and dry eastern Pacific (Cai et al., 2015).</p>
      <p>Past El Niño events have been observed to have different local
occurrences and parameter distributions in recent years. There has been
evidence of an increased occurrence of El Niño events in the central
Pacific called Central Pacific (CP) El Niño or “El Niño Modoki”
(e.g., Ashok and Yamagata, 2009; Dewitte et al., 2012), different from the
cold tongue, or Eastern Pacific (EP), El Niño events that develop in the
eastern Pacific. For a typical CP El Niño, the largest sea surface
temperature (SST) increase occurs at the Equator between 130<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and
160<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, while cooling appears off the shelf of Peru. For the EP El
Niño the SST increases at the Equator east of 180<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W to South
America and southward along the South American coast to Chile (e.g., Dewitte
et al., 2012).</p>
      <p>In the eastern tropical South Pacific (ETSP), a subsurface low oxygen zone
exists with a pronounced minimum in oxygen at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 to 500 m depth and
is referred to as an oxygen minimum zone (OMZ) or oxygen deficient zone
(ODZ). This ODZ is suboxic (oxygen concentrations below
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5–10.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; e.g., Karstensen et al., 2008;
Stramma et al., 2008). In suboxic regions nitrate and nitrite become involved
in respiration processes such as denitrification or anammox (e.g., Kalvelage
et al., 2013). In the eastern equatorial Pacific the oxygen content has been
shown to increase during El Niño events in the upper 300 to 350 m in the
equatorial channel (e.g., Fuenzalida et al., 2009; Czeschel et al., 2012), as
well as off the Peruvian coast (e.g., Helly and Levin, 2004). Coastal winds
during El Niño events are usually upwelling favorable, and thus could not
produce the observed warming (Kessler, 2006). Coastal warming during El
Niño is caused by downwelling Kelvin waves generated by mid-Pacific
westerly wind anomalies that deepen the eastern thermocline, nutricline, and
oxycline and allow warming to occur, independent of the local winds (Kessler,
2006). Consequently, during El Niño events the upwelled water off Peru is
warmer, more oxygen replete and less nutrient rich. El Niño, in general,
results in a depressed thermocline and thus reduced rates of macronutrient
supply and primary production (Pennington et al., 2006) off Peru, which also
contributes to an oxygen increase on the shelf (Gutiérrez et al., 2008).
In the case of strong El Niño events when the oxygen concentration above
the shelf bottom increases from about zero to
&gt; 40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the sediments respond with
tremendous changes in ecological state (Gutiérrez et al., 2008). At a
time-series station at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 77<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W off Lima
from 1996 to 2010 for temperature, salinity, density, oxygen, and nutrients,
the influence of El Niño – especially the strong 1997/98 El Niño –
is clearly visible, with higher temperature, salinity, and oxygen, and lower
density, nitrite, silicate, and phosphate (Graco et al., 2016).</p>
      <p>Here we use measurements from an R/V <italic>Sonne</italic> research cruise in
October 2015 (Fig. 1) from a section across the Equator east of the Galapagos
Islands and from four sections off the Peruvian shelf, to investigate changes
in the upper ocean related to the strong 2015 El Niño in comparison with
earlier cruises in this region. The aim is to unravel the progress of the
transition to El Niño conditions in the eastern Pacific several months
after the start of the El Niño.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Cruise track (blue line) and CTD (conductivity–temperature–depth)
stations (black circles) of cruise R/V <italic>Sonne</italic> from Guayaquil
5 October to Antofagasta 22 October 2015, as well as equatorial stations
March 1993, February 2009, and November 2012 (yellow “x”), CTD sections off
Peru December 2012 (red “x”), and ADCP sections across the Equator (yellow
line). Topography (color) with depth/height contours in 1000 m intervals
enhanced by the 200 m depth contour.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/12/861/2016/os-12-861-2016-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data sets and methods</title>
      <p>In October 2015 an R/V <italic>Sonne</italic> transit cruise (So243; 5 to
22 October 2015) from Guayaquil, Ecuador, to Antofagasta, Chile, was carried
out (Fig. 1) (short cruise report available at
<uri>https://www.ldf.uni-hamburg.de/sonne/wochenberichte/wochenberichte-sonne/so242-243/so243-scr.pdf</uri>),
which allowed us to investigate possible El Niño signals at the Equator
near 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and off the shelf of Peru at sections perpendicular
to the shelf at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S.</p>
      <p>A Seabird CTD system with a GO (General Oceanics) rosette with
24 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 L water bottles was used for water profiling and discrete
water sampling. The CTD system was used with double sensors for temperature,
conductivity (salinity), and oxygen. The dual CTD temperature sensors
calibrated by the manufacturer are compared during the cruise so that the
deviation is less than 0.002 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and the accuracy of the temperature
measurements is estimated to be 0.002 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C or better. The CTD salinity
calibration with salinometer salinity samples resulted in a rms uncertainty
of 0.0011. The CTD oxygen sensors were calibrated with oxygen measurements
obtained from discrete samples from the rosette applying the classical
Winkler titration method, using a non-electronic titration stand (Winkler,
1888; Hansen, 1999). The rms uncertainty of the CTD oxygen sensor calibration
of cruise So243 was determined to be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Oxygen concentrations of less than 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are not
resolved by Winkler titration and values below 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
were used as 0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the sensor calibration, as the
H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>S smell of the water of related rosette bottles indicated
0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Nutrients were measured on-board with a QuAAtro auto-analyzer (Seal
Analytical). Nitrite (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, nitrate (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, phosphate
(PO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and silicid acid (Si(OH)<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, referred to as silicate
hereinafter) were measured with an analytical precision of 5.5, 1.3, 0.4, and
0.5 % respectively. The N : P ratio used here was computed as
N : P <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : PO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Two vessel-mounted acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCP) were used to
record ocean velocities in October 2015: an RDI OceanSurveyor 75 kHz ADCP
with 8 m bin spacing provided the velocity distribution to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 650 m
depth, while a 38 kHz ADCP with 32 m bin spacing provided velocity profiles
down to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1300 m depth. During the entire cruise the navigation data
was of high quality. Due to the interest in the upper ocean, the
higher-resolution 75 kHz ADCP is used here.</p>
      <p>Earlier crossings of the Equator (Table 1 and Fig. 1) were accomplished in
March/April 1993 on R/V <italic>Knorr</italic> (Tsuchiya and Talley, 1998), in
February 2009 on R/V <italic>Meteor</italic> (Czeschel et al., 2011), and in
November 2012 on R/V <italic>Meteor</italic> (Stramma et al., 2013) at
85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W. Sections across the Peruvian shelf between 9 and
16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S were made during R/V <italic>Meteor</italic> cruise M91 in December
2012 (Czeschel et al., 2015; Bange, 2013). Measurement accuracies during
these cruises were similar to October 2015 and the details are described in
the related literature. In contrast to October 2015, the CTD stations in
1993, 2009, and 2012 were not carried out at 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S,
85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, but at 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S at
85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, and these two stations were combined for a mean profile
at 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. The sections across the Equator and off the Peruvian
shelf were not at identical geographical coordinates, but we expect that the
offset will be small compared to the differences measured.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Time and geographical location of CTD data used in this study and
the NINO <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ONI indices for the months of observation or for 2 months
for measurements carried out at the end or beginning of a month listed in the
tables (<uri>http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/sstoi.indices</uri> and
<uri>http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensostuff/ensoyears.shtml</uri>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Time</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Location</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NINO <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ONI</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">29–31 Mar 1993</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.65 Mar, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.97 Apr</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 March, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7 Apr</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12–13 Feb 2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1–3 Nov 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.11 Oct, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.38 Nov</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.4 Oct, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 Nov</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7–8 Oct 2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6–23 Dec 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.68</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10–19 Oct 2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Different indices exist to describe the El Niño status and will be used
here to determine the El Niño status at the time of the measurements. The
NINO <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> index is the temperature difference compared to the 1982–2005
climatological cycle in the eastern tropical Pacific (0–10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S,
80–90<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), and is close to the region of the measurements used
here. The Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) has become a standard for identifying
El Niño and La Niña events. It is a running 3-month mean SST anomaly
for the Niño 3.4 region (i.e., 5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S,
120–170<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) related to the 1981–2010 base period. Events are
defined as five consecutive overlapping 3-month periods at or above the
0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C anomaly for warm El Niño events, and at or below the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C anomaly for cold La Niña events.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{The El Ni\~{n}o in 2015}?><title>The El Niño in 2015</title>
      <p>The SST anomaly for 27 September 2015 to 24 October 2015 was strong along the
Equator to the South American continent and southward off the Peruvian coast
(Fig. 2). The NINO <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> index was high at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.52 in October 2015 (Table 1);
hence, the 2015 El Niño is a clear EP El Niño. The SST distribution
in fall 2015 shows a strong and prominent SST increase along central America
and in the eastern North Pacific at 20–25<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N that differs from the
typical EP El Niño distribution. This feature, also known as “The
Blob”, is an unrelated positive temperature anomaly that developed in 2013
in the Gulf of Alaska and progressed along the North American continent to
the 20–25<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N region in mid-2015 (Kintisch, 2015).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Average sea surface temperature anomalies in  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C for the
period 27 September to 24 October 2015. Image with permission from NOAA
extracted from the
<uri>http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/lanina/enso_evolution-status-fcsts-web.pdf</uri>
file version from 26 October 2015, redrawn with very minor modifications to
improve the figure quality.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/12/861/2016/os-12-861-2016-f02.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The only El Niño events since 1950 with an October maximum ONI of more
than 1.7, or an overall maximum of 2.0 or larger, are the 1972/73, 1982/83,
and 1997/98 El Niños. In early 2015 the ONI was even larger than the ONI
of these three large El Niño events, while in October 2015 it was at a
similar strength as the three earlier strong El Niños (Fig. 3).
Accordingly, the 2015 El Niño has to be listed as one of the four
strongest El Niños since 1950.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>ONI for the strong El Niño years 1972 (dash-dotted), 1982
(dotted), 1997 (dashed), and the years used here: 1993 (green), 2009 (blue),
2012 (red), and 2015 (black line). The months of measurements used here are
marked by colored dots.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/12/861/2016/os-12-861-2016-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>The equatorial region east of the Galapagos Islands</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>The hydrographic variability</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Background information</title>
      <p>The hydrographic distribution in the eastern equatorial Pacific is influenced
by a seasonal cycle as well as El Niño-related cycles. At 110<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W
in the eastern Pacific west of the Galapagos Islands, relationships between
zonal velocity, temperature, and salinity in the EUC are all evident in the
seasonal cycle. The EUC peaks in strength around April/May, when it also
surfaces (Johnson et al., 2002). The thermocline is extremely sharp and
shallow. The meridional equatorial spreading of the thermocline associated
with the EUC zonal velocity strength is noticeably stronger during April than
in October, when in April equatorial SST is lowest and the South Equatorial
Current (SEC) is strongest (Johnson et al., 2002). The laterally isolated
salinity maximum within the thermocline just south of the Equator is
strongest when the EUC velocity is at its greatest (Johnson et al., 2002),
and this is also visible in the sea surface salinity (Supplement Fig. S1)
from the MIMOC climatology (Schmidtko et al., 2013). Between austral fall and
winter the minimal oxygen concentration of the ODZ core in the eastern South
Pacific at the Equator changes from 8 to 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Paulmier and Ruiz-Pino, 2009).</p>
      <p>Weaker trade winds during El Niño conditions result in a weaker
equatorial circulation, while stronger trade winds during La Niña
conditions lead to a stronger equatorial circulation (Johnson et al., 2002).
During La Niña, the current system at 110<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W is spun upwards
when compared to El Niño. The cold tongue located in the eastern tropical
Pacific is quite weak during El Niño. Surface salinities are generally
fresher during El Niño than during La Niña, a feature that is at
least partially a product of increased local precipitation associated with
the eastward migration of warm sea surface temperatures and convection, and
partly a result of the reduced trade winds (Johnson et al., 2002). For the
1996–1998 El Niño–La Niña cycle, a fresh mixed layer in the eastern
equatorial Pacific and higher salinity within the pycnocline (defined by the
20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C isotherm) during the El Niño was observed. The higher
salinity was caused by the larger equatorward spreading of the subsurface
salinity maximum of the South Pacific Tropical Water (SPTW) due to anomalous
eastward flow south of the Equator with the relaxation of the South
Equatorial Current and the weaker EUC at the Equator (Johnson et al., 2000).
Hence, during El Niño events higher salinity should be expected near the
pycnocline.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Observations for the 2015 El Ni\~{n}o}?><title>Observations for the 2015 El Niño</title>
      <p>SST anomalies for the period 27 September to 24 October 2015 showed an SST
anomaly of 2.0–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W at and south of the
Equator, and of 1.5–2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C just north of the Equator (Fig. 2). In
the upper 100 m of the water column, oxygen, temperature, salinity, and
density profiles at the Equator on the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W meridian
(Fig. 4) reveal differences between March 1993, February 2009, November 2012,
and the El Niño of October 2015. It is important to note that 1993 was
not defined as an official El Niño year as only four, instead of five,
consecutive overlapping 3-month periods were at or above the 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
anomaly. However, in March and April 1993 the NINO <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> index reached
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.65 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.97 (Table 1) and had El Niño-like SST anomalies. To this
end, we will refer to March 1993 as `El Niño-like” hereinafter.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Upper 100 m profiles at the Equator at 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W for
30 March 1993 (green), 12 February 2009 (blue), 2 November 2012 (red), and at
the Equator at 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W for 7 October 2015 (black)
for <bold>(a)</bold> oxygen in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> potential
temperature in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <bold>(c)</bold> salinity, and <bold>(d)</bold> potential
density in kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/12/861/2016/os-12-861-2016-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>In February 2009 the ONI was for the fourth and last month <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 or less;
therefore, conditions were similar to a weak La Niña event and we will
refer to it as “La Niña-like” hereinafter. In February 2009, in the
upper 100 m at the Equator at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, the oxygen and
temperature were lowest and the density highest compared to the other three
periods (Fig. 4), representing an expected La Niña parameter
distribution. The hydrographic profiles in the neutral ONI period in November
2012 mainly lay between the El Niño profiles for March 1993 and
October 2015, and the La Niña-like profiles in February 2009. The
November 2012 profiles were somewhat closer to the February 2009 profiles.
The El Niño profiles in October 2015 and the El Niño-like profiles in
March 1993 showed slightly higher oxygen concentrations and temperature, and
lower density in the upper 100 m in comparison to November 2012 and
February 2009 (Fig. 4). In October 2015 the salinity compared to the 3 other
years was lowest in a deep thermocline in the upper 40 m, as expected for
the surface layer during an El Niño event because of the increased
precipitation and reduced equatorial upwelling. In contrast, a weak salinity
maximum was located below 40 m, as expected near the pycnocline as saline
warm water progresses from the western Pacific eastward during El Niño.
In October 2015 the higher temperature, higher salinity, and lower density
reached down to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 350 m, while the oxygen profile below 130 m merges
with the profiles from the other measurement periods (Fig. 5).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Same as Fig. 4 but for 100 to 400 m depth.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/12/861/2016/os-12-861-2016-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The strong thermocline/pycnocline of the eastern tropical Pacific is also a
strong nutricline. A consistent general pattern is that nitrate and phosphate
increase with depth to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 m with a slight maximum at intermediate
depths, while silicate continues to increase with depth (Fiedler and Talley,
2006). The vertical distribution of nutrients at the Equator at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W shows lower nitrate, phosphate, and silicate
concentrations in the upper 200 m in October 2015 as well as in the El
Niño-like year 1993 in comparison to the 2009 and 2012 concentrations
(Fig. 6). A primary nitrite maximum (PNM) usually occurs in the lower
euphotic zone, which results from nitrite excretion by phytoplankton and/or a
decoupling of ammonia and nitrite oxidation (i.e., higher rates of ammonia
vs. nitrite oxidation; Fiedler and Talley, 2006; Lomas and Lipschultz, 2006).
At the Equator in the eastern Pacific nitrite is close to undetectable below
100 m depth (Fig. 6). In 1993 and 2015, however, the PNM was located
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 m deeper and maximum nitrite concentrations were considerably
higher. This reflects the deeper pycnocline in El Niño years. The
enhanced nitrite concentrations seem to be caused by the northward transport
of high nitrite concentration found in the PNM of the SPTW (e.g., Tsuchiya
and Talley, 1998, and as observed during cruise M90) in combination with a
reduced photo inhibition of ammonia oxidation at deeper water depths (see,
e.g., Ward, 2008; Grundle et al., 2013). Furthermore, the deep thermocline
and pycnocline in October 2015 indicate that equatorial upwelling was
reduced. According to the upper ocean hydrographic and nutrient distribution
in October 2015, a clear El Niño situation had adjusted at the Equator at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Upper 300 m profiles at the Equator at 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W for
30 March 1993 (green), 12 February 2009 (blue), 2 November 2012 (red), and at
the Equator at 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W for 7 October 2015 (black) for
<bold>(a)</bold> nitrate in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> nitrite in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (scale change at 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<bold>(c)</bold> phosphate in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(d)</bold> silicate
in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/12/861/2016/os-12-861-2016-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>At 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W in the 50–300 m layer,
salinity and temperature were higher and the density lower in October 2015
than at the other three times; however, the oxygen was not significantly
higher during this time (Fig. S2). At 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W in the 50 to 250 m layer, the salinity,
temperature, and oxygen were lower and the density higher in the La
Niña-like month of February 2009 than in the other 3 years. The
temperature at 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S in the El Niño of October 2015 was
higher in the 50 to 250 m depth range than in the other 3 years and salinity
showed slightly higher values at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 to 100 and 150 to 250 m depth.
The oxygen concentration was slightly higher only in the upper <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 m
for both El Niño events in March 1993 and in October 2015 compared to
2009 and 2012 (Fig. S3). However, earlier selected measurements at
4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W showed a clear oxygen increase to a depth of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 350 m depth for the El Niño years 1982/83 in comparison to
non-El Niño measurements (Czeschel et al., 2012); hence, we conclude that
El Niño influence on the water mass distribution was still weak at
2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S in October 2015 and only developing in the upper ocean.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Circulation observations</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Background information</title>
      <p>The EUC, which carries oxygen-rich water towards the ODZs of the eastern
Pacific, has a seasonal cycle, with a transport peak in the eastern Pacific
at 95<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W in April/May of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 Sv and a minimum in
October/November of a little less than 15 Sv (Johnson et al., 2002; their
Fig. 17). The Galapagos Islands form a barrier to the EUC, which causes it to
bifurcate into a shallow/southern core centered at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 m depth (EUCs)
and a deeper/northern core centered at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 150 m depth (EUCd)
(Karnauskas et al., 2010). We are not aware of any El Niño-related EUC
variability observations east of the Galapagos Islands. Results from an ocean
model for 110<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W show an increase in the surface eastward EUC
current during austral fall, while during other seasons the EUC is at deeper
depth (Cravatte et al., 2007). ROMS (Regional Ocean Model System) model
results (Montes et al., 2011) for El Niño periods east of the Galapagos
Islands show the EUC flowing at a shallower depth associated with lighter
water. The model runs display a weakening and southward shift of the EUC
branches east of the Galapagos Islands with weaker transports, which are
variable, depending on the boundary conditions provided by different ocean
general circulation models (OGCMs). The modeled ROMS EUC transports at
86<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W between 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S at 200 m depth for
February/March and October/November depending on the OGCMs are <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10–12
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7–8 Sv for OCCAM, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6–8 and 4–5 Sv for SODA, and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.5 and 7–8 SV for ORCA (Echevin et al., 2011).</p>
      <p>During the 1997/98 El Niño shipboard current measurements showed that the
EUC virtually disappeared across much of the Pacific basin, associated with
the weakening or even the reversal of the equatorial pressure gradient within
the pycnocline (Johnson et al., 2000). For the 1982–1983 El Niño there
seems to be a strong time delay for the EUC weakening. In September 1982 at
159<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, the EUC reversed (Firing et al., 1983); however, at
95<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, the EUC was strong in November 1982 before being replaced by
a westward jet in May 1983 (Hayes et al., 1986).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Observations for the 2015 El Ni\~{n}o}?><title>Observations for the 2015 El Niño</title>
      <p>The direct velocity observations in October 2015 on the diagonal section from
the Ecuadorian shelf to 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, show only a weak
signature of the zonal EUC in the upper 100 m located mainly at, and south,
of the Equator (Fig. 7a). The weak transport of the EUC is 0.01 Sv between
1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, and 0.29 Sv between 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and
1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. The westward flow in the upper 200 m is mainly connected to a
northward flow direction (Fig. 7b) north of 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. This northwesterly
flow indicates the flow of oxygen-poor water from the ODZ off the South
American continent to the west near the Equator.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>ADCP zonal (positive eastward) <bold>(a)</bold> and meridional (positive
northward) <bold>(b)</bold> velocity sections (in m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the diagonal
section from the Ecuadorian shelf at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S to
1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W on 5 and 6 October 2015 (see Fig. 1). The
contour interval is 0.1 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=170.716535pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/12/861/2016/os-12-861-2016-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>The direct velocity observations on the meridional section at
85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W between 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and the
diagonal continuation to 5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 84<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W again show the
weak signature of the EUC in the upper 100 m located mainly at and south of
the Equator north of 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S in October 2015 (Fig. 8d). The EUC
transport in the upper 300 m is 0.02 Sv between 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and
1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 0.78 Sv between 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S
(Table 2). The stronger eastward flow component in the upper 200 m between
3<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S might be a combination of the EUC and the
Southern Subsurface Countercurrent (SSCC; also called the Tsuchiya Jet), as
described for El Niño periods east of the Galapagos Islands in model
results (Montes et al., 2011). The eastward flow near 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S below
200 m is the South Intermediate Countercurrent (SICC).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Zonal ADCP velocity sections (in m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; positive eastward;
contour interval 0.1 m s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the meridional path from 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N
to 5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S at 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W <bold>(a)</bold> in March 1993,
<bold>(b)</bold> in February 2009, <bold>(c)</bold> in November 2012, and
<bold>(d)</bold> from 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N to 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S at 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W
and diagonal to 5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 84<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W in October 2015 (see
Fig. 1).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/12/861/2016/os-12-861-2016-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Summed zonal positive (eastward) and negative (westward) ADCP
transports in Sv (10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the equatorial channel at
85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W in March 1993, February 2009, and November 2012 and at
85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W in October 2015 as well as the related El Niño
status. The velocity data were slightly smoothed and extrapolated to the
surface.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Time</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0–300 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0–300 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">El Niño status</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">29–31 Mar 1993</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Early El Niño-like</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12–13 Feb 2009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Late La Niña-like</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1–3 Nov 2012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.94</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.36</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Neutral</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7–8 Oct 2015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.86</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">El Niño</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>The strongest EUC in our four measurement periods occurred at the end of
March 1993, with 12.77 Sv between 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N in the
upper 300 m (Table 2; Fig. 8a). This measurement at the end of March was
close to the time of eastern Pacific EUC peak transport in April/May. In
addition, it was at the beginning of an El Niño-like phase, where warmer,
oxygen-rich water is transported from the western to the eastern tropical
Pacific and could enhance the eastward flow component.</p>
      <p>In February 2009 the EUC transport between 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N
was weak (3.55 Sv), although it occurred only 2 months before the time of
the seasonal EUC peak transport. As previously described, February 2009 was
at the end of a short La Niña-like period with an ONI of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.7, and the
low EUC transport might be related to a generally weak eastward transport of
warm western equatorial Pacific water during La Niña. On a cruise
approximately 1.5 months later in March to April 2009 between the Galapagos
Islands and Ecuador, a region of possible strong cross-hemispheric exchange
was observed immediately to the east of the Galapagos Islands, where a
shallow (200 m) 300 km wide northeastward surface flow transported 7 to
11 Sv (Collins et al., 2013). This northeastward flow might have weakened
the EUC transport at and south of the Equator. The two diagonal sections in
March/April 2009 crossed the 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W section at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>50 and 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and, similarly to the
February 2009 measurements, showed a 50 m depth eastward and westward flow
at 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>50 and 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, respectively, and a westward flow at
both of these latitudes at 200 m depth. In contrast to the velocity
distribution in March 1993, November 2012, and October 2015 (Fig. 8), the
eastward flow component in the upper 200 m south of 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S
almost disappeared in February 2009.</p>
      <p>The EUC transport in November 2012 at 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W between
1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N was 10.78 Sv in the upper 300 m (Table 2).
The months before these measurements had no large ONI values and should
represent the non-El Niño EUC transport in this region for November. The
transport of 10.78 Sv in November at 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W is less than the
November minimum at 95<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 Sv (Johnson et al., 2002;
their Fig. 17), and seems to be a reasonable estimate east of the Galapagos
Islands, as the EUC transport decreases in the eastern Pacific. The core of
the EUC below 200 m is quite deep and agrees with the seasonal cycle where
the EUC should be located at deeper depth in austral spring.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>The upwelling region off Peru</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <title>Background information</title>
      <p>Off Peru a highly productive year-round upwelling system is located between 4
and 16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (Chavez and Messié, 2009). Since the 1950s, an SST
decline corresponding to an increase in upwelling has been observed off Peru
(Gutiérrez et al., 2011). The SST off Peru measured at six locations
between 5 and 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S over a period of 6 years shows a seasonal cycle
of 2 to 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C amplitude with the largest SST near March and the
minimum near October (Montes et al., 2011; their Fig. 4). This seasonal cycle
is also visible in the MIMOC climatology for 9 and 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S
(Fig. S1). The time-series station at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S,
77<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W shows a seasonal cycle of about 20 m displacement for
the 15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C isotherm, the oxycline depth, and the upper boundary of
the ODZ (Graco et al., 2016). Seasonal eddy fluxes are described along the
coast of Peru, with the largest signal at approximately 15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S with a
peak during the austral winter (Vergara et al., 2016). The typical nutrient
distribution along a cross-shelf section at 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (as seen in
December 2012) shows elevated phosphate concentrations in the surface waters
near the coast, whereas nitrate is depleted in the water column and the
near-surface waters close to the coast (Kock et al., 2016; their Fig. 3).</p>
      <p>Conditions that develop along the coast of Ecuador, Peru, and northern Chile
during El Niño events include a strengthening of the poleward flow along
the coast of Peru, persistent deepening of the thermocline, reducing or even
reversing the prevailing upwelling-induced land–sea temperature gradient,
and a southward shift in the position of the ITCZ (Inter-Tropical Convergence
Zone), which brings heavy precipitation to normally arid regions (Strub et
al., 1998). A reduction in coastal cloud cover due to warmer water next to
the coast may enhance insolation and reduce atmospheric pressure over land,
maintaining the pressure difference and winds over the coast. As a result,
upwelling-favorable winds are not greatly reduced when El Niño conditions
are observed in the ocean (Enfield 1981; Huyer et al., 1987; Strub et al.,
1998; Halpern et al., 2002). In general, upwelling-favorable winds and
upwelling continue during El Niño events, and water continues to be drawn
from 50 to 100 m depth to the surface layer, but the thermocline and
nutricline are displaced downward and thickened, so that upwelling during El
Niño brings only warm and nutrient-poor water to the surface (Enfield
1981; Huyer et al., 1987; Strub et al., 1998; Halpern et al., 2002). The
intensity of the upwelling appears to be determined by an interplay between
along-shore, poleward advection and wind intensity, but also by the
cross-shore geostrophic flow and distribution of the water masses on a scale
of 1000 km or more (Colas et al., 2008). In relation to the downward
displacement of the thermocline and nutricline, the oxycline is also
displaced downward. For the 1997/98 El Niño event, Helly and Levin (2004)
described a possible depression of the upper layer of the ODZ (defined by
oxygen concentrations &lt; 0.5 mL L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22.3<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by 100 m, reducing the ODZ area off
Peru and northern Chile (6–20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) by 61 % (from 77 000 to
30 000 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Observations for the 2015 El Ni\~{n}o}?><title>Observations for the 2015 El Niño</title>
      <p>The SST anomalies for the period 27 September to 24 October 2015 (Fig. 2)
showed a strong SST anomaly of 1.5–2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C between 8 and
14<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and a weaker anomaly of 0.5–1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C between 14 and
20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. Differing hydrographic distributions were measured off Peru
at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S in December 2012 with a neutral ONI status and in
October 2015 with the strong El Niño. In the entire upper 300 m at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, temperature, salinity (Figs. S4 and S5), and oxygen
(Fig. 9) were higher in October 2015 than in December 2012. In contrast to
the typical seasonal cycle that is characterized by lower SST in October than
in December, the SST at 9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S was higher in October 2015 than in
December 2012 as a result of the El Niño-related SST increase. Higher
upper water column temperatures in October 2015 also correlated with lower
densities in the upper 300 m (as can be seen from the selected isopycnals in
Fig. 9) despite the concurrent influence on density from the salinity
increase. Accordingly the density changes are temperature dominated. In
December 2012 there was strong upwelling at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S with the
&lt; 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> layer located below
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 m depth, while in October 2015 this low oxygen layer was only
found below 240 m depth. The October 2015 nutrient profiles obtained from
shelf stations at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S with water depths of little more than
100 m (not shown) highlight the fact that nitrate, phosphate, and silicate
concentrations were lower, and nitrite concentrations were higher in
comparison to profiles from the same location in December 2012, as would be
expected for El Niño periods. Although the isopycnals and parameter
distribution show that upwelling at 9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S was occurring in October
2015, it is clear that warmer, saline, and oxygen-replete water was being
upwelled, and that the contribution of oxygen-depleted and nutrient-rich
water was strongly reduced.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Oxygen section (color; in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; same color
scale in both frames) at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S off the Peruvian shelf for
December 2012 <bold>(a)</bold> and October 2015 <bold>(b)</bold>. Three selected
isopycnals are included as white dashed lines. Please note that the section
in October 2015 reaches further west than in December 2012.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/12/861/2016/os-12-861-2016-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>At <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S the measured oxygen distributions for December 2012
and October 2015 are quite similar in the upwelling region at the easternmost
station pair with oxygen concentrations of less than
5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 10). The oxygen concentration between the
isopycnals <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 25.6 and 25.8 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was even lower in
October 2015 than in December 2012 in the upwelling region east of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 77<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W (Fig. 10). However, below the oxycline below
50 m depth, temperature, salinity, and oxygen concentrations (Fig. 11f) were
higher in October 2015 than in December 2012 and indicate the transition to
El Niño conditions. The seasonal signal in the time-series station at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 77<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W shows a shallower 15 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
isotherm and oxycline depth of about 20 m in October than in December (Graco
et al., 2016); hence, the deeper oxycline in October 2015 compared to
December 2012 is not a seasonal signal but an El Niño influence. The
nutrient distribution at the shelf at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (Fig. 11) also
shows El Niño influence with lower phosphate and silicate in October 2015
than in December 2012. This is in agreement with the observed increase in
temperature and salinity, and the lower phosphate and silicate at the
time-series station at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S during the strong 1997/1998 El
Niño (Graco et al., 2016). Under El Niño conditions upwelling is
reduced and this prevents nutrients such as phosphate and silicate from
becoming enriched in the mixed layer. Nitrate and nitrite are different,
however, because their distributions are driven more by oxygen availability,
which regulates nitrification and denitrification. Indeed, nitrate was lower
and nitrite was higher in December 2012 than in October 2015, with nitrite
reaching 5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 75 m in December 2012 (Fig. 11),
consistent with the observations of Kock et al. (2016). At the depths of the
high nitrite concentrations in December 2012, very low oxygen concentrations
of less than 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were measured. Under low oxygen
conditions, incomplete nitrification, incomplete denitrification, or a
combination of both, can result in accumulations of nitrite (e.g., Codispoti
and Christensen, 1985; Gruber, 2008; Brockmann and Morgenroth, 2010), as was
likely the case during 2012. The higher oxygen concentrations in the ODZ at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S during October 2015 would have prevented the build-up
of nitrite, as under these conditions denitrification shuts off and
nitrification goes to completion, producing more nitrate.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Oxygen section (color; in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; same color
scale in both frames) at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S off the Peruvian shelf for
December 2012 <bold>(a)</bold> and October 2015 <bold>(b)</bold>. Three selected
isopycnals are included as white dashed lines.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/12/861/2016/os-12-861-2016-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p>Nutrient profiles at shelf stations with water depth of slightly
more than 100 m in December 2012 at 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 77<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>31<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W
(green) and in October 2015 at 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>21<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 77<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>25<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W
(black) for <bold>(a)</bold> nitrate in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<bold>(b) </bold>nitrite in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, (scale change at
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> phosphate in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(d)</bold> silicate in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol L<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<bold>(e)</bold> N : P ratio, and <bold>(f)</bold> CTD oxygen in
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>mol kg<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://os.copernicus.org/articles/12/861/2016/os-12-861-2016-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Another notable difference between December 2012 and October 2015 at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S is the lower N : P ratios in the upper 150 m during
2012 vs. 2015 (Fig. S6e). Again, higher oxygen concentrations in the upper
150 m during the 2015 El Niño probably reduced the impact of fixed N
loss processes on the N : P signatures of near-surface waters. These
results imply that El Niño conditions could, at least, partially
alleviate phytoplankton N limitation due to the reduction in the magnitude of
denitrification. While it is beyond the scope of the focus of this study, it
would be interesting to examine whether this increase in N : P ratios
during the 2015 El Niño impacted the phytoplankton communities within
this region. The expectation that they may have impacted the phytoplankton
communities is certainly reasonable (Rousseaux and Gregg, 2012), as Hauss et
al. (2012) observed an increase in diatom biomass when the
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : PO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of water collected from the Peruvian
upwelling region were increased.</p>
      <p>The results from <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S shelf water indicate that upwelling
of oxygen-poor water was still continuing in October 2015 at 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S
in the near-surface layer, despite the enhanced SST anomaly related to El
Niño. Below the oxycline, however, El Niño conditions were
developing. The observations west of 77<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>48<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W in the upper 75 m
show that oxygen as well as temperature (not shown) were lower in
October 2015, maybe related to a stronger poleward flow of the Peru–Chile
Undercurrent (PCUC), which has been shown to be a characteristic of El
Niño events (Strub et al., 1998). The PCUC advects seawater property
anomalies from equatorial to extratropical regions and shoals during El
Niño despite the velocity and transport intensification (Montes et al.
2011; Chaigneau et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>At <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S at the easternmost station near the shelf, the
oxygen distribution is quite similar for December 2012 and October 2015
(Fig. S6), indicating non-El Niño oxygen-poor upwelling near the shelf.
West of 77<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, the isopycnals are deeper in October 2015, related to
a deeper thermocline with warmer water in the upper 100 m (not shown) and
higher oxygen in October 2015 compared to December 2012. Similar to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S the nutrient distribution shows higher nitrate and
lower phosphate and silicate in October 2015 compared to December 2012 at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. As outlined above, the higher nitrate concentrations
in October 2015 likely result from less denitrification and more complete
nitrication, as a result of the increased oxygen concentrations, and this
again provides evidence of a developing El Niño situation.</p>
      <p>At <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S the oxygen concentrations at the shelf were lower
in October 2015 than in December 2012 (Fig. S7), indicating similarity to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S non-El Niño upwelling close to the shelf. The
higher oxygen near the shelf in December 2012 was probably related to an
unusual distribution related to an eddy located near the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S section (e.g., Stramma et al., 2013; Czeschel et al.,
2015). The SST at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S was lower in October
2015 than in December 2012; hence, the slight increase in SST by El Niño
did not compensate for the typical seasonal SST signal. Different to the
sections at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S the density distribution below the thermocline did not
shift to higher densities in October 2015, which shows that the El Niño
influence at 16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S was the weakest of the four shelf sections. The
observed transitional feature of normal conditions near-shore and El Niño
conditions offshore is probably a consequence of the cross-shore pattern in
vertical velocity during upwelling. The near-shore vertical velocity is
expected to be substantially larger than the offshore vertical velocity
(Fennel, 1999). A downwelling Kelvin wave could then neutralize the weak
offshore upwelling and bring down the thermocline, while near-shore the
strong upwelling would hardly weaken and for some time still bring up
remnants of cold oxygen-poor water, until supplies feed from the offshore
warmer and oxygen-replete waters. The wind field would not need to change in
order to produce this transition pattern in hydrography.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In this study, hydrographic measurements from a cruise to the eastern
tropical Pacific in October 2015 were used to investigate the signal of the
strong 2015 El Niño in the water mass distribution and in the EUC in
comparison to measurements from the years 1993, 2009, and 2012. An increase
in temperature from the surface to 350 m depth, and salinity in the 40 to
350 m depth layer, appeared at the Equator east of the Galapagos Islands at
85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W in October 2015. The warmer temperature led to lower
densities despite the concurrent influence of the salinity increase on
density. In October 2015, nitrate, phosphate, and silicate concentrations
were all lower in the upper 200 m when compared with previous non-El
Niño periods; however, higher oxygen concentrations, which are
characteristic of El Niño events, were only located between 40 and 130 m
at the Equator. Except for an oxygen increase in the upper <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 m at
2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, no obvious large vertical oxygen increase appeared at
1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S at 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W. This weak oxygen
increase at and near the Equator might be related to the weak EUC, which
would otherwise be expected to bring oxygen-richer water eastwards.</p>
      <p>Due to the influence of seasonal and El Niño signals, the velocity and
transport observations of the EUC east of the Galapagos Islands were quite
variable in the direct velocity measurements in different years. In addition,
intraseasonal signals with the passage of upwelling and downwelling waves at
intraseasonal timescales (Cravatte et al., 2003; Echevin et al., 2014) might
modify the measurements. As previously observed in the central and western
Pacific, and as predicted from model simulations, the EUC at the Equator
almost disappeared, with a transport of only 0.02 Sv between 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S
and 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N in October 2015 related to the El Niño conditions.
Although weak, the EUC had shifted southward, with a transport of 0.78 Sv
between 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S in October 2015. These observations
are in agreement with the predicted weakening and southward shift of the EUC
in model results for El Niño periods (Montes et al., 2011). According to
earlier observations, the disappearance of the EUC in the eastern Pacific
seems to be related mainly to strong El Niño events. For the very strong
1982/83 El Niño, a disappearance of the EUC was described for the eastern
Pacific (Halpern, 1997), whereas for the strong 1997/98 El Niño the EUC
disappeared over all longitudes (Izumo, 2005). In contrast, during the
moderate El Niños of 1986/87 and 1991/92 a disappearance was described in
the western and central Pacific, but only a weakening in the eastern Pacific
(McPhaden et al., 1990; McPhaden and Hayes, 1990; Izumo, 2005; Kessler and
McPhaden, 1995; Seidel and Giese, 1999).</p>
      <p>Four hydrographic sections near the Peruvian shelf between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9 and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S had different El Niño related signals in
October 2015. At <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S there was a large SST increase, and we
observed upwelling of lighter water that was both warmer and more oxygenated,
all of which are characteristic upwelling features of El Niño events.
Between 12 and 16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S the SST increase in October 2015 was weaker
than at 9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, and at the easternmost stations near the Peruvian
shelf at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S cold and
oxygen-poor water was upwelled as during regular upwelling conditions,
probably some leftover water from the pre-El Niño period. West of the
easternmost stations, El Niño type changes were also observed below the
thermocline and oxycline, a feature that weakened southward and that may be
related to the shoaling and intensification of the PCUC and the influence of
a downwelling Kelvin wave.</p>
      <p>The 2015 El Niño started strongly early in the year, and by October 2015
had an ONI similar to earlier major El Niño events. The water
characteristics at 85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W at the Equator and EUC variability and
upwelling at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S also indicated that a strong EP El
Niño had developed. However, at 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S at
85<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and at the sections near the shelf between 12 and
16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, the El Niño influence was still weak. To this end, the
weak EUC clearly indicated a strong EP El Niño at the Equator, while off
the South American continent the distribution of hydrographic parameters,
oxygen, and nutrients indicated a transition period from regular to El
Niño conditions progressing southward along the Peruvian shelf. Despite
the strong 2015 El Niño, the shift to El Niño distribution in the
eastern Pacific was surprisingly slow. As the ONI increased to the end of
2015, we expect that the El Niño conditions were strengthening in the
eastern Pacific after the cruise in October 2015. Measurements carried out by
CNRS, IRD, and IMARPE with a glider from IFREMER at about 8<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S off
Peru between 7 November and 17 December 2015 showed an increase in
temperature and oxygen and a decrease in density at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 100 m when
compared to October 2015, thus confirming the expected strengthening of the
El Niño conditions
(<ext-link xlink:href="https://www.ird.fr/toutel-actualite/actualites/communiques-et-dossiers-de-presse/cp-2015/lancement-de-cienperu-projetcienperu-projet-d-etude-des-impacts-d-el-nino-2015-2016-sur-l-ecosysteme-marindu-perou">https://www.ird.fr/toutel-actualite/actualites/</ext-link>).</p>
      <p>In summary, the temperature, salinity, and oxygen measurements all indicate
that during October 2015 the El Niño was strongest along our northern
transects and weakest along our southern transects. This was also apparent in
the nutrient properties between the northern and southern portions of our
study region. As outlined above, at 12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S the N : P ratio was
higher and nitrite concentrations were lower during October 2015 when
compared to the non-El Niño period of December 2012, both of which point
to a reduction in the magnitude of denitrification. When comparing the
differences between coastal nutricline N : P ratios and nitrite
concentrations along the coast, we found that the differences between
October 2015 and December 2012 decreased between 12 and 14<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, and
again between 14 and 16<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (data not shown). This again highlights
the potential for El Niño events to impact N loss processes and upper
water column biogeochemistry.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The data from the R/V <italic>Knorr</italic> cruise in March/April 1993 are available
for ADCP at
<uri>ftp://ftp.soest.hawaii.edu/caldwell/adcp/DATABASE/00015.html</uri>, for CTD
data as <uri>https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.294039</uri>, and for
nutrients as <uri>https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.837024</uri>. The
assembled measurements of the <italic>Meteor</italic> cruises in February 2009,
November 2012, and December 2012 and the <italic>Sonne</italic> cruise in
October 2015 used in this paper are available at
<uri>https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.861392</uri>.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/os-12-861-2016-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/os-12-861-2016-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>Lothar Stramma and  Tim Fischer conceived the study,
wrote the manuscript, and carried out the ADCP and hydrographic measurements
on the R/V <italic>Sonne</italic> cruise in 2015 as well as on some of the R/V
<italic>Meteor</italic> cruises. Damian S. Grundle was co-chief scientist of the R/V
<italic>Sonne</italic> cruise in October 2015, organized the nutrient sampling, and
interpreted the nutrient data. Gerd Krahmann calibrated the R/V
<italic>Meteor</italic> and R/V <italic>Sonne</italic> CTD data and interpreted the
hydrographic data. Hermann W. Bange was chief scientist on R/V
<italic>Meteor</italic> in December 2012, he was responsible for the nutrient
measurements on this cruise and interpreted the nutrient data.
Christa A. Marandino was chief scientist on the R/V <italic>Sonne</italic> cruise in
October 2015 and interpreted the nutrient data. All authors discussed and
modified the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) provided support as part of
Sonderforschungsbereich 754: Climate-Biogeochemistry Interactions in the
Tropical Ocean and for the R/V <italic>Meteor</italic> cruises. The Bundesministerium
für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) supported this study as part of the
SOPRAN project (03F0611A, 03F0662A) and through funding of the R/V
<italic>Sonne</italic> cruise in October 2015 (03G0243A). We thank the captains and
crews of the R/V <italic>Meteor</italic> and R/V <italic>Sonne</italic> cruises for their
help, R. Czeschel for helpful comments on the graphic software, T. Steinhoff
for co-organizing the R/V <italic>Sonne</italic> cruise, and M. Lohmann and H. Campen
for the oxygen and nutrient measurements. <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: M. Hoppema</p></ack><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ashok, K. and Yamagata, T.: The El Niño with a difference, Nature, 461,
481–484, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bange, H. W.: Surface Ocean – Lower Atmosphere Study (SOLAS) in the upwelling
region off Peru – Meteor Cruise No M91, Meteor Berichte, Bremerhaven, 69 pp.,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Brockmann, D. and Morgenroth, E.: Evaluating operating conditions for out-competing nitrite oxidizers and maintaining partial nitrification in biofilm
systems using biofilm modeling and Monte Carlo filtering, Water Res., 44,
1995–2009, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Cai, W., Borlace, S., Lengaigne, M., van Rensch, P., Collins, M., Vecchi, G.,
Timmermann, A., Santoso, A., McPhaden, M. J., Wu, L., England, M. H., Wang,
G., Guilyardi, E., and Jin, F.-F.: Increasing frequency of extreme El
Niño events due to greenhouse warming, Nature Climate Change, 4,
111–116,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chaigneau, A., Dominguez, N., Eldin, G., Vasquez, L., Flores, R., Grados, C.,
and Echevin, V.: Near-coastal circulation in the Northern Humboldt Current
system from shipboard ADCP data, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 5251–5266,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Changnon, S. A.: El Niño 1997–1998: the climate event of the century,
Oxford University Press, New York, ISBN 019-513552-0, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chavez, F. P. and Messié, M.: A comparison of eastern boundary upwelling
ecosystems, Prog. Oceanogr., 83, 80–96,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Colas, F., Capet, X., McWilliams, J. C., and Shchepetkin, A.: 1987–1998 El
Niño off Peru: A numerical study, Prog. Oceanogr., 79, 138–155,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Collins, C., Mascarenhas, A., and Martinez, R.: Structure of ocean
circulation between Galapagos Islands and Ecuador, Adv. Geosci., 33, 3–12,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Codispoti, L. A. and Christensen, J. P.: Nitrification, denitrification, and
nitrous oxide cycling in the eastern tropical South Pacific Ocean, Mar. Chem.
16, 277–300, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Cravatte, S., Picaut, J., and Eldin, G.: Second and first baroclinic Kelvin
modes in the equatorial Pacific at intraseasonal timescales, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 3266, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001511" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JC001511</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Cravatte, S., Madec, G., Izumo, T., Menkes, C., and Bozec, A.: Progress in
the 3-D circulation of the eastern equatorial Pacific in a climate model,
Ocean Model., 17, 28–48, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2006.11.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ocemod.2006.11.003</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Czeschel, R., Stramma, L., Schwarzkopf, F. U., Giese, B. J., Funk, A., and
Karstensen, J.: Middepth circulation of the eastern tropical South Pacific
and its link to the oxygen minimum zone, J. Geophys. Res., 116, C01015,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006565" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JC006565</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Czeschel, R., Stramma, L., and Johnson, G. C.: Oxygen decreases and
variability in the eastern equatorial Pacific, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C11019,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JC008043</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Czeschel, R., Stramma, L., Weller, R. A., and Fischer, T.: Circulation,
eddies, oxygen, and nutrient changes in the eastern tropical South Pacific
Ocean, Ocean Sci., 11, 455–470, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/os-11-455-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-11-455-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Dewitte, B., Vazquez-Cuervo, J., Goubanova, K., Illig, S., Takahashi, K.,
Cambon, G., Purca, S., Correa, D., Gutierrez, D., Sifeddine, A., and Ortlieb,
L.: Change in El Niño flavours over 1958–2008: Implications for the
long-term trend of the upwelling off Peru, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 77–80,
143–156, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Echevin, V., Colas, F., Chaigneau, A., and Penven, P.: Sensitivity of the
Northern Humboldt Current System nearshore modelled circulation to initial
boundary conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 116, C07002, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006684" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JC006684</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Echevin, V., Albert, A., Lévy, M., Graco, M., Aumont, O., Piétri, A.,
and Garric, G.: Intraseasonal variability of nearshore productivity in the
Northern Humboldt current system: The role of coastal trapped waves, Cont.
Shelf Res., 73, 14–30, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Enfield, D. B.: Thermally driven wind variability in the planetary boundary
layer above Lima, Peru, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 2005–2016, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Fennel, W.: Theory of the Benguela upwelling system, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 29,
177–190, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Fiedler, P. C. and Talley, L. D.: Hydrography of the eastern tropical
Pacific: A review, Prog. Oceanogr., 69, 143–180,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Firing, E., Lukas, R., Sadler, J., and Wyrtki, K.: Equatorial Undercurrent
disappears during 1982–1983 El Niño, Science, 222, 1121–1123, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Fuenzalida, P., Schneider, W., Garces-Vargas, J., Bravo, L., and Lange, C.:
Vertical and horizontal extension of the oxygen minimum zone in the eastern
South Pacific Ocean, Deep-Sea Res., Pt. II, 56, 992–1003,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Graco, M., Purca, S., Dewitte, B., Morón, O., Ledesma, J., Flores, G.,
Castro, C., and Gutiérrez, D.: The OMZ and nutrients features as a
signature of interannual and low frequency variability off the peruvian
upwelling system, Biogeosciences Discuss., <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-2015-567" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-2015-567</ext-link>, in
review, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Gruber, N.: The marine nitrogen cycle: overview and challenges, in: Nitrogen
in the Marine Environment, edited by: Capone, D. G., Bronk, D. A.,
Mulholland, M. R., and Carpenter, E. J., Academic Press, Burlington, MA,
1–50, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Grundle, D. S., Juniper, S. K., and Giesbrecht, K. E.: Euphotic zone
nitrification in the NE subarctic Pacific: Implications for measurements of
new production, Mar. Chem., 155, 113–123, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Gutiérrez, D., Enríquez, E., Purca, S., Quipúzcoa, L., Marquina,
R., Flores, G., and Graco, M.: Oxygenation episodes on the continental shelf
of central Peru: Remote forcing and benthic ecosystem response, Prog.
Oceanogr., 79, 177–189, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Gutiérrez, D., Bouloubassi, I., Sifeddine, A., Purca, S., Goubanova, K.,
Graco, M., Field, D., Méjanelle, L., Velazco, F., Lorre, A., Salvatteci,
R., Quispe, D., Vargas, G., Dewitte, B., and Ortlieb, L.: Coastal cooling and
increased productivity in the main upwelling zone off Peru since the
mid-twentieth century, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L07603,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046324" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL046324</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Halpern, D.: Observations of annual and El Nino flow variations at
0<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 110<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W and 0<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, 95<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W during 1980–85,
J. Geophys. Res., 92, 8197–8212, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Halpern, D.: Offshore Ekman transport and Ekman pumping off Peru during the
1997–1998 El Niño, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1075,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014097" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GL014097</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, H. P.: Determination of oxygen, in: Methods of Seawater analysis,
edited by: Grasshoff, K. K. and Ehrhardt, M., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany,
75–89, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Hauss, H., Franz, J., and Sommer, U.: Changes in N : P stoichiometry
influence taxonomic composition and nutritional quality of phytoplankton in
the Peruvian upwelling, J. Sea Res., 73, 74–85,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hayes, S. P., Mangum, L. J., Barber, R. T., Huyer, A., and Smith, R. L.:
Hydrographic variability west of the Galapagos Islands during the 1982–83 El
Niño, Prog. Oceanogr., 17, 137–162, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Helly, J. J. and Levin, L. A.: Global distribution of naturally occurring
marine hypoxia on continental margins, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 51, 1159–1168,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Huyer, A., Smith, R. L., and Paluszkiewicz, T.: Coastal upwelling off Peru
during normal and El Niño times, 1981–1984, J. Geophys. Res., 92,
14297–14307, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Izumo, T.: The equatorial undercurrent, meridional overturning circulation,
and their roles in mass and heat exchanges during El Nino events in the
tropical Pacific ocean, Ocean Dynam., 55, 110–123,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, G. C., McPhaden, M. J., Rowe, G. D., and McTaggert, K. E.: Upper
equatorial Pacific Ocean current and salinity variability during the
1996–1998 El Niño-La Niña cycle, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 1037–1053,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, G. C., Sloyan, B. M., Kessler, W. S., and McTaggert, K. E.: Direct
measurements of upper ocean currents and water mass properties across the
tropical Pacific during the 1990s, Prog. Oceanogr., 52, 31–61, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Kalvelage, T., Lavik, G., Lam, P., Contreras, S., Arteaga, L., Löscher,
C. R., Oschlies, A., Paulmier, A., Stramma, L., and Kuypers, M. M. M.:
Nitrogen cycling driven by organic matter export in the South Pacific oxygen
minimum zone, Nat. Geosci., 6, 228–234, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1739" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/NGEO1739</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Karnauskas, K. B., Murtugudde, R., and Busalacchi, J.: Observing the
Galapagos-EUC interaction: Insights and challenges, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 40,
2768–2777, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Karstensen, J., Stramma, L., and Visbeck, M.: Oxygen minimum zones in the
eastern tropical Atlantic and Pacific oceans, Prog. Oceanogr., 77, 331–350,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Kessler, W. S.: The circulation of the eastern tropical Pacific: A review,
Prog. Oceanogr., 69, 181–217, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Kessler, W. S. and McPhaden, M. J.: The 1991–1993 El Niño in the central
Pacific, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 42, 295–333, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Kintisch, E.: “The Blob” invades Pacific, flummoxing climate experts,
Science, 348, 17–18, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Kock, A., Arévalo-Martínez, D. L., Löscher, C., and Bange, H.
W.: Extreme N<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O accumulation in the coastal oxygen minimum zone off
Peru, Biogeosciences, 13, 827–840, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-827-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-827-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Lomas, M. W. and Lipschultz, F.: Forming the primary nitrite maximum:
Nitrifiers or phytoplankton?, Limnol. Oceanogr., 51, 2453–2467, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
McPhaden, M. J. and Hayes; S. P.: Variability in the eastern equatorial
Pacific during 1986–1988, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 13195–13208, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
McPhaden, M. J., Hayes, S. P., Mangum, L. J., and Toole, J. M.: Variability
in the western equatorial Pacific during the 1986–87 El Nino-Southern
Oscillation event, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 20, 190–208, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
McPhaden, M. J., Zebiak, S. E., and Glantz, M. H.: ENSO as an Integrating
Concept in Earth Science, Science, 314, 1740–1745,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Montes, I., Schneider, W., Colas, F., Blanke, B., and Echevin, V.: Subsurface
connections in the eastern tropical Pacific during La Niña 1999–2001 and
El Niño 2002–2003, J. Geophys. Res., 116, C12022,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007624" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JC007624</ext-link>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Paulmier, A. and Ruiz-Pino, D.: Oxygen minimum zones (OMZs) in the modern
ocean, Prog. Oceanogr., 80, 113–128, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Pennington, J. T., Mahoney, K. L. Kuwahara, V. S., Kolber, D. D., Calienes,
R., and Chavez, F. P.: Primary production in the eastern tropical Pacific: A
review, Prog. Oceanogr., 69, 285–317, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Rousseaux, C. S. and Gregg, W. W.: Climate variability and phytoplankton
composition in the Pacific Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C10006,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008083" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JC008083</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Schmidtko, S., Johnson, G. C., and Lyman, J. M.: MIMOC: A global monthly
isopycnal upper-ocean climatology with mixed layers, J. Geophys. Res., 118,
1658–1672, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrc.20122</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Seidel, H. F. and Giese, B. S.: Equatorial currents in the Pacific Ocean
1992–1997, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 7849–7863, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Stramma, L., Johnson, G. C., Sprintall, J., and Mohrholz, V.: Expanding
oxygen-minimum zones in the tropical oceans, Science, 320, 655–658, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Stramma, L., Bange, H. W., Czeschel, R., Lorenzo, A., and Frank, M.: On the
role of mesoscale eddies for the biological productivity and biogeochemistry
in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean off Peru, Biogeosciences, 10,
7293–7306, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7293-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-10-7293-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Strub, P. T., Mesías, J. M., Montecino, V., Rutllant, J., and Salinas,
S.: Coastal ocean circulation off western South America coastal segment
(6,e), The Sea, edited by: Robinson A. R. and Brink, K. H., 11 273–313, ISBN
0-471-11545-2, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Tsuchiya, M. and Talley, L. D.: A Pacific hydrographic section at
88<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W: Water property distribution, J. Geophys. Res., 103,
12899–12918, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Ulloa, O., Escribano, R., Hormazabal, S., Quiñones, R. A., González,
R. R., and Ramos, M.: Evolution and biological effects of the 1997–98 El
Niño in the upwelling ecosystem off northern Chile, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
28, 1591–1594, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Vergara, O., Dewitte, B., Montes, I., Garçon, V., Ramos, M., Paulmier,
A., and Pizarro, O.: Seasonal Variability of the Oxygen Minimum Zone off Peru
in a high-resolution regional coupled model, Biogeosciences Discuss.,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-2015-631" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-2015-631</ext-link>, in review, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, C. and Fiedler, P. C.: ENSO variability in the eastern tropical
Pacific: A review, Prog. Oceanogr., 69, 239–266,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Ward, B. B.: Nitrification in marine systems, in: Nitrogen in the Marine
Environment, edited by: Capone, D. G., Bronk, D. A., Mulholland, M. R., and
Carpenter, E. J., 2nd Edn., Elsevier, Amsterdam,  199–261,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Winkler, L. W.: Bestimmung des im Wasser gelösten Sauerstoffs, Ber.
Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 21, 2843–2855, 1888.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Observed El Niño conditions in the eastern tropical Pacific in October
2015</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">A strong El Niño developed in early 2015. Measurements from a research
cruise on the R/V <i>Sonne</i> in October 2015 near the Equator east of the
Galapagos Islands and off the shelf of Peru are used to investigate changes
related to El Niño in the upper ocean in comparison with earlier cruises
in this region. At the Equator at 85°30′ W, a clear temperature
increase leading to lower densities in the upper 350 m had developed in
October 2015, despite a concurrent salinity increase from 40 to 350 m. Lower
nutrient concentrations were also present in the upper 200 m, and higher
oxygen concentrations were observed between 40 and 130 m. In the equatorial
current field, the Equatorial Undercurrent (EUC) east of the Galapagos
Islands almost disappeared in October 2015, with a transport of only 0.02 Sv
in the equatorial channel between 1° S and 1° N, and a weak
current band of 0.78 Sv located between 1 and 2°30′ S. Such
near-disappearances of the EUC in the eastern Pacific seem to occur only
during strong El Niño events. Off the Peruvian shelf at
 ∼  9° S, characteristics of upwelling were different as warm,
saline, and oxygen-rich water was upwelled. At  ∼  12,  ∼  14, and
 ∼  16° S, the upwelling of cold, low-salinity, and oxygen-poor
water was still active at the easternmost stations of these three sections,
while further west on these sections a transition to El Niño conditions
appeared. Although from early 2015 the El Niño was strong, the October
measurements in the eastern tropical Pacific only showed developing El
Niño water mass distributions. In particular, the oxygen distribution
indicated the ongoing transition from “typical” to El Niño conditions
progressing southward along the Peruvian shelf.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ashok, K. and Yamagata, T.: The El Niño with a difference, Nature, 461,
481–484, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bange, H. W.: Surface Ocean – Lower Atmosphere Study (SOLAS) in the upwelling
region off Peru – Meteor Cruise No M91, Meteor Berichte, Bremerhaven, 69 pp.,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Brockmann, D. and Morgenroth, E.: Evaluating operating conditions for out-competing nitrite oxidizers and maintaining partial nitrification in biofilm
systems using biofilm modeling and Monte Carlo filtering, Water Res., 44,
1995–2009, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Cai, W., Borlace, S., Lengaigne, M., van Rensch, P., Collins, M., Vecchi, G.,
Timmermann, A., Santoso, A., McPhaden, M. J., Wu, L., England, M. H., Wang,
G., Guilyardi, E., and Jin, F.-F.: Increasing frequency of extreme El
Niño events due to greenhouse warming, Nature Climate Change, 4,
111–116,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Chaigneau, A., Dominguez, N., Eldin, G., Vasquez, L., Flores, R., Grados, C.,
and Echevin, V.: Near-coastal circulation in the Northern Humboldt Current
system from shipboard ADCP data, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 5251–5266,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Changnon, S. A.: El Niño 1997–1998: the climate event of the century,
Oxford University Press, New York, ISBN 019-513552-0, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Chavez, F. P. and Messié, M.: A comparison of eastern boundary upwelling
ecosystems, Prog. Oceanogr., 83, 80–96,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Colas, F., Capet, X., McWilliams, J. C., and Shchepetkin, A.: 1987–1998 El
Niño off Peru: A numerical study, Prog. Oceanogr., 79, 138–155,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Collins, C., Mascarenhas, A., and Martinez, R.: Structure of ocean
circulation between Galapagos Islands and Ecuador, Adv. Geosci., 33, 3–12,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Codispoti, L. A. and Christensen, J. P.: Nitrification, denitrification, and
nitrous oxide cycling in the eastern tropical South Pacific Ocean, Mar. Chem.
16, 277–300, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Cravatte, S., Picaut, J., and Eldin, G.: Second and first baroclinic Kelvin
modes in the equatorial Pacific at intraseasonal timescales, J. Geophys.
Res., 108, 3266, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001511" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2002JC001511</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Cravatte, S., Madec, G., Izumo, T., Menkes, C., and Bozec, A.: Progress in
the 3-D circulation of the eastern equatorial Pacific in a climate model,
Ocean Model., 17, 28–48, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2006.11.003" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ocemod.2006.11.003</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Czeschel, R., Stramma, L., Schwarzkopf, F. U., Giese, B. J., Funk, A., and
Karstensen, J.: Middepth circulation of the eastern tropical South Pacific
and its link to the oxygen minimum zone, J. Geophys. Res., 116, C01015,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006565" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010JC006565</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Czeschel, R., Stramma, L., and Johnson, G. C.: Oxygen decreases and
variability in the eastern equatorial Pacific, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C11019,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008043" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2012JC008043</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Czeschel, R., Stramma, L., Weller, R. A., and Fischer, T.: Circulation,
eddies, oxygen, and nutrient changes in the eastern tropical South Pacific
Ocean, Ocean Sci., 11, 455–470, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/os-11-455-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/os-11-455-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Dewitte, B., Vazquez-Cuervo, J., Goubanova, K., Illig, S., Takahashi, K.,
Cambon, G., Purca, S., Correa, D., Gutierrez, D., Sifeddine, A., and Ortlieb,
L.: Change in El Niño flavours over 1958–2008: Implications for the
long-term trend of the upwelling off Peru, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 77–80,
143–156, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Echevin, V., Colas, F., Chaigneau, A., and Penven, P.: Sensitivity of the
Northern Humboldt Current System nearshore modelled circulation to initial
boundary conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 116, C07002, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006684" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010JC006684</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Echevin, V., Albert, A., Lévy, M., Graco, M., Aumont, O., Piétri, A.,
and Garric, G.: Intraseasonal variability of nearshore productivity in the
Northern Humboldt current system: The role of coastal trapped waves, Cont.
Shelf Res., 73, 14–30, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Enfield, D. B.: Thermally driven wind variability in the planetary boundary
layer above Lima, Peru, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 2005–2016, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Fennel, W.: Theory of the Benguela upwelling system, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 29,
177–190, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Fiedler, P. C. and Talley, L. D.: Hydrography of the eastern tropical
Pacific: A review, Prog. Oceanogr., 69, 143–180,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Firing, E., Lukas, R., Sadler, J., and Wyrtki, K.: Equatorial Undercurrent
disappears during 1982–1983 El Niño, Science, 222, 1121–1123, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Fuenzalida, P., Schneider, W., Garces-Vargas, J., Bravo, L., and Lange, C.:
Vertical and horizontal extension of the oxygen minimum zone in the eastern
South Pacific Ocean, Deep-Sea Res., Pt. II, 56, 992–1003,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Graco, M., Purca, S., Dewitte, B., Morón, O., Ledesma, J., Flores, G.,
Castro, C., and Gutiérrez, D.: The OMZ and nutrients features as a
signature of interannual and low frequency variability off the peruvian
upwelling system, Biogeosciences Discuss., <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-2015-567" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-2015-567</a>, in
review, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Gruber, N.: The marine nitrogen cycle: overview and challenges, in: Nitrogen
in the Marine Environment, edited by: Capone, D. G., Bronk, D. A.,
Mulholland, M. R., and Carpenter, E. J., Academic Press, Burlington, MA,
1–50, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Grundle, D. S., Juniper, S. K., and Giesbrecht, K. E.: Euphotic zone
nitrification in the NE subarctic Pacific: Implications for measurements of
new production, Mar. Chem., 155, 113–123, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Gutiérrez, D., Enríquez, E., Purca, S., Quipúzcoa, L., Marquina,
R., Flores, G., and Graco, M.: Oxygenation episodes on the continental shelf
of central Peru: Remote forcing and benthic ecosystem response, Prog.
Oceanogr., 79, 177–189, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Gutiérrez, D., Bouloubassi, I., Sifeddine, A., Purca, S., Goubanova, K.,
Graco, M., Field, D., Méjanelle, L., Velazco, F., Lorre, A., Salvatteci,
R., Quispe, D., Vargas, G., Dewitte, B., and Ortlieb, L.: Coastal cooling and
increased productivity in the main upwelling zone off Peru since the
mid-twentieth century, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L07603,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046324" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2010GL046324</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Halpern, D.: Observations of annual and El Nino flow variations at
0°, 110° W and 0°, 95° W during 1980–85,
J. Geophys. Res., 92, 8197–8212, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Halpern, D.: Offshore Ekman transport and Ekman pumping off Peru during the
1997–1998 El Niño, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1075,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014097" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001GL014097</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, H. P.: Determination of oxygen, in: Methods of Seawater analysis,
edited by: Grasshoff, K. K. and Ehrhardt, M., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany,
75–89, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Hauss, H., Franz, J., and Sommer, U.: Changes in N : P stoichiometry
influence taxonomic composition and nutritional quality of phytoplankton in
the Peruvian upwelling, J. Sea Res., 73, 74–85,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hayes, S. P., Mangum, L. J., Barber, R. T., Huyer, A., and Smith, R. L.:
Hydrographic variability west of the Galapagos Islands during the 1982–83 El
Niño, Prog. Oceanogr., 17, 137–162, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Helly, J. J. and Levin, L. A.: Global distribution of naturally occurring
marine hypoxia on continental margins, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I, 51, 1159–1168,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Huyer, A., Smith, R. L., and Paluszkiewicz, T.: Coastal upwelling off Peru
during normal and El Niño times, 1981–1984, J. Geophys. Res., 92,
14297–14307, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Izumo, T.: The equatorial undercurrent, meridional overturning circulation,
and their roles in mass and heat exchanges during El Nino events in the
tropical Pacific ocean, Ocean Dynam., 55, 110–123,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, G. C., McPhaden, M. J., Rowe, G. D., and McTaggert, K. E.: Upper
equatorial Pacific Ocean current and salinity variability during the
1996–1998 El Niño-La Niña cycle, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 1037–1053,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Johnson, G. C., Sloyan, B. M., Kessler, W. S., and McTaggert, K. E.: Direct
measurements of upper ocean currents and water mass properties across the
tropical Pacific during the 1990s, Prog. Oceanogr., 52, 31–61, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kalvelage, T., Lavik, G., Lam, P., Contreras, S., Arteaga, L., Löscher,
C. R., Oschlies, A., Paulmier, A., Stramma, L., and Kuypers, M. M. M.:
Nitrogen cycling driven by organic matter export in the South Pacific oxygen
minimum zone, Nat. Geosci., 6, 228–234, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1739" target="_blank">doi:10.1038/NGEO1739</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Karnauskas, K. B., Murtugudde, R., and Busalacchi, J.: Observing the
Galapagos-EUC interaction: Insights and challenges, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 40,
2768–2777, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Karstensen, J., Stramma, L., and Visbeck, M.: Oxygen minimum zones in the
eastern tropical Atlantic and Pacific oceans, Prog. Oceanogr., 77, 331–350,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Kessler, W. S.: The circulation of the eastern tropical Pacific: A review,
Prog. Oceanogr., 69, 181–217, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Kessler, W. S. and McPhaden, M. J.: The 1991–1993 El Niño in the central
Pacific, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. II, 42, 295–333, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Kintisch, E.: “The Blob” invades Pacific, flummoxing climate experts,
Science, 348, 17–18, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Kock, A., Arévalo-Martínez, D. L., Löscher, C., and Bange, H.
W.: Extreme N<sub>2</sub>O accumulation in the coastal oxygen minimum zone off
Peru, Biogeosciences, 13, 827–840, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-827-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-13-827-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Lomas, M. W. and Lipschultz, F.: Forming the primary nitrite maximum:
Nitrifiers or phytoplankton?, Limnol. Oceanogr., 51, 2453–2467, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
McPhaden, M. J. and Hayes; S. P.: Variability in the eastern equatorial
Pacific during 1986–1988, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 13195–13208, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
McPhaden, M. J., Hayes, S. P., Mangum, L. J., and Toole, J. M.: Variability
in the western equatorial Pacific during the 1986–87 El Nino-Southern
Oscillation event, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 20, 190–208, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
McPhaden, M. J., Zebiak, S. E., and Glantz, M. H.: ENSO as an Integrating
Concept in Earth Science, Science, 314, 1740–1745,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Montes, I., Schneider, W., Colas, F., Blanke, B., and Echevin, V.: Subsurface
connections in the eastern tropical Pacific during La Niña 1999–2001 and
El Niño 2002–2003, J. Geophys. Res., 116, C12022,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007624" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2011JC007624</a>, 2011.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Paulmier, A. and Ruiz-Pino, D.: Oxygen minimum zones (OMZs) in the modern
ocean, Prog. Oceanogr., 80, 113–128, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Pennington, J. T., Mahoney, K. L. Kuwahara, V. S., Kolber, D. D., Calienes,
R., and Chavez, F. P.: Primary production in the eastern tropical Pacific: A
review, Prog. Oceanogr., 69, 285–317, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Rousseaux, C. S. and Gregg, W. W.: Climate variability and phytoplankton
composition in the Pacific Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 117, C10006,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008083" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2012JC008083</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidtko, S., Johnson, G. C., and Lyman, J. M.: MIMOC: A global monthly
isopycnal upper-ocean climatology with mixed layers, J. Geophys. Res., 118,
1658–1672, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20122" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jgrc.20122</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Seidel, H. F. and Giese, B. S.: Equatorial currents in the Pacific Ocean
1992–1997, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 7849–7863, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Stramma, L., Johnson, G. C., Sprintall, J., and Mohrholz, V.: Expanding
oxygen-minimum zones in the tropical oceans, Science, 320, 655–658, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Stramma, L., Bange, H. W., Czeschel, R., Lorenzo, A., and Frank, M.: On the
role of mesoscale eddies for the biological productivity and biogeochemistry
in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean off Peru, Biogeosciences, 10,
7293–7306, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-7293-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-10-7293-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Strub, P. T., Mesías, J. M., Montecino, V., Rutllant, J., and Salinas,
S.: Coastal ocean circulation off western South America coastal segment
(6,e), The Sea, edited by: Robinson A. R. and Brink, K. H., 11 273–313, ISBN
0-471-11545-2, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Tsuchiya, M. and Talley, L. D.: A Pacific hydrographic section at
88° W: Water property distribution, J. Geophys. Res., 103,
12899–12918, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Ulloa, O., Escribano, R., Hormazabal, S., Quiñones, R. A., González,
R. R., and Ramos, M.: Evolution and biological effects of the 1997–98 El
Niño in the upwelling ecosystem off northern Chile, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
28, 1591–1594, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Vergara, O., Dewitte, B., Montes, I., Garçon, V., Ramos, M., Paulmier,
A., and Pizarro, O.: Seasonal Variability of the Oxygen Minimum Zone off Peru
in a high-resolution regional coupled model, Biogeosciences Discuss.,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-2015-631" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/bg-2015-631</a>, in review, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, C. and Fiedler, P. C.: ENSO variability in the eastern tropical
Pacific: A review, Prog. Oceanogr., 69, 239–266,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Ward, B. B.: Nitrification in marine systems, in: Nitrogen in the Marine
Environment, edited by: Capone, D. G., Bronk, D. A., Mulholland, M. R., and
Carpenter, E. J., 2nd Edn., Elsevier, Amsterdam,  199–261,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Winkler, L. W.: Bestimmung des im Wasser gelösten Sauerstoffs, Ber.
Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 21, 2843–2855, 1888.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
